The Long Term Outlook Of The Offensive Line

A look at the problem child of the offense: the linemen. 

Last week, I wrote extensively on the comparative “need” of the two problem areas of the Packers defense. Today, I’ll be diving in on the offensive side of things, with a quick trip into the troubled waters of the offensive line. 

We all know the story by now. In the offseason of 2025, longtime center Josh Myers was allowed to leave the team, and the Packers plugged the hole he left in a bit of an unorthodox fashion. 

Instead of making a 1 for 1 addition at the center position, in free agency or the draft, the team opted instead to move veteran guard Elgton Jenkins into the center role. Then, the addition was actually made at Jenkins’ old spot, left guard. Aaron Banks joined the team on a rather large contract, totaling four years and $77 million dollars. 

The idea was simple. Addition by subtraction, via letting the perinally disappointing Myers out the door, letting the always rock-solid Elgton Jenkins stabilize the spot, and bet big on a breakout from Aaron Banks. Meanwhile, Rasheed Walker could take a step forward in his contract year, before being replaced by Jordan Morgan. Zach Tom had just signed a major extension to stay in Green Bay and anchor the line for years to come. And at right guard, Sean Rhyan / Jordan Morgan could push each other in a starting competition, where the winner could contribute heavily towards the team’s success. There was a path forward for the Packers to once again put a solid OL in front of their franchise QB. 

Spoiler alert: that didn’t happen. 

In what was one of the most disappointing facets of the 2025 season, the offensive line crumbled under injuries, poor performances, and schematic failings. Going over each and every one of these would be an entire article itself, so I’ll skip that for now. The question is: where do we go from here?

The first place to start is taking a look at who will be on the roster long term. 

The Packers currently have eleven players under contract along the offensive line. At tackle: Dalton Cooper, Travis Glover, Anthony Belton, Zach Tom and Jordan Morgan. Their guards are: Karsen Barnheart, Brant Banks, John Williams and Aaron Banks. And lastly at center they have Jacob Monk and Elgton Jenkins. Of players they have under contract beyond this season, that number drops to eight. It includes Glover, Belton, Jenkins, Tom, Morgan, Williams, Aaron Banks, and Monk. However, Elgton Jenkins is almost certainly a cap casualty this offseason, as the Packers will save a cool $20 million in cap space by making the move. So, our list of future Packers drops to seven. 

It’s not as certain, but the team could also choose to move on from Aaron Banks this offseason as well, after only one year with the team. In doing so, the team would free up only $4 million in cap space for the 2026 offseason, but would ensure $17 million in relief for next year. That $17 million in space would have to be claimed this offseason, so the Packers have a big decision to make. 

The Packers could boost their numbers by resigning one or more of the four players who will be free agents this offseason: Rasheed Walker, Sean Rhyan, Donovan Jennings, and Darian Kinnard. Of this list, Sean Rhyan is the clearest possibility to receive an extension, after some good but not great work filling in as the starting center. I also think if he’s open to a team friendly deal, the team could want to keep Darian Kinnard around. He was the team’s preferred man for their 6 OL “jumbo” packages late in the season, and I see no reason why they would want to move away from those sections of the playbook. 

Clearly, the Packers will be in need of some new linemen, if only from a numbers perspective. Green Bay usually likes to carry eight or so linemen on gameday active rosters, so they will need to invest into the position in order to make that a reality, while also maintaining a healthy supply of backups and developmental projects. 

Assuming the Packers keep Aaron Banks, the 2026 starting lineup is already mostly set. From left to right, Green Bay’s line will almost certainly be Jordan Morgan, Aaron Banks, Sean Rhyan, Anthony Belton and Zach Tom. That’s not a horrible lineup. It’s probably a lineup that you could even talk yourself into. Jordan Morgan showed tons of promise at tackle, late into the season. It’s easy to see him as an upgrade over Rasheed Walker’s disaster of a season. Aaron Banks was solid when healthy. Rhyan was an upgrade over Jenkins at center last season. Anthony Belton did a fantastic job of learning a new position in the NFL, in real time. And Zach Tom should be his old self after a summer of recovery. 

But isn’t that what we also sold ourselves on last offseason? That the hypothetical moves that the Packers made would only come out in the best possible scenario? The other side is just as possible, and an outcome in between probably isn’t enough to get the Packers where they want to go. There’s also the problem that this lineup leaves the team’s depth in dire straits, across all positions. You’d probably be looking at Jacob Monk and Travis Glover being the team’s primary backups, which is not a situation that would give me much relief. Of course, that’s still relying on the as of now hypothetical situation of having resigned Sean Rhyan. If the Packers can’t get that done, they are looking at starting center Jacob Monk. 

The problem is that Green Bay has limited options for true investment into the position. Obviously, we have no first round selection in the draft for the next two years thanks to the acquisition of Micah Parsons. That trade is obviously worth the price, but there’s still a bit of reaping to accomplish after the sowing. 

Can you find an impact offensive linemen after the first round? Abso-freaking-lutely. The Packers are famous for doing it. In fact, only one of those projected offensive linemen is a first rounder, and it’s the one who hasn’t really found a way onto the field yet. The Packers will need to work their magic again, but even if they do, expecting any sort of first year ROI is a bit too much to ask. 

The Packers best bet to get a rookie onto the field (outside of injury, of course) is probably at center. There are a couple of options for the Packers in this year's draft, so we might see this possibility play out yet, especially when considering the Sean Rhyan situation. 

At guard, I think the team is content to let Anthony Belton settle in at right guard, but they could certainly use an heir apparent to Aaron Banks on the other side. Drafting another tackle convert to fit in there in the near future should absolutely be on the table. 

Tackle might be the most “set” position, with a long term contract locked in for Zach Tom and Jordan Morgan finally taking over at left tackle. They’d be wise to hedge their bets with another shot at a tackle prospect however. 

So, that leaves us with needs at tackle, guard and center. So far through this article, I have been mostly discounting the possibility of the team’s backups developing in a significant way. Maybe that’s not exactly fair on my part. After all, the Packers can develop those guys. They’ve been doing it for decades. And to be fair, we haven’t seen anything out of John Williams so far due to his unfortunate injury, and there’s a similar story with Travis Glover, who was reportedly looking impressive before his own season ending injury. Perhaps they, Jacob Monk or some combination therein can provide the much necessary depth that the Packers desperately need. Stranger things have happened. 

I also don’t think there’s many options to be found in free agency, and that’s also a pretty expensive avenue to pursue. Finding a starting offensive lineman in that way is getting more and more costly, and the front office may get cold feet over the Aaron Banks experience. 

Active investment into the OL is a path forward out of the murky land of offensive line uncertainty. Developing their current projects is another. One thing is clear though: Green Bay cannot and should not rely on the status quo going into 2026. Ideally I’d love to see at least two investments into the group during the draft: a high-end center prospect and a day three versatile tackle. 

Hopefully this is a meaningful step that the Packers can take towards fixing one of their biggest problem spots of the 2025 season.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns!

__________________________

 

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (43)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Leatherhead's picture

January 28, 2026 at 10:13 am

Math

Usually, 9 OL make the 53. Sometimes, 10. You have the five starters, and you have the backups. Sometimes, you keep a project like Caleb Jones on the roster so he doesn't get poached, so you're really only suiting up 8 OL

The three backups.....these are guys that are on the field playing for us in the playoffs, every single season. When Love threw the interception against SF that ended our season, we had a backup on the field in place of Tom. Against Philadelphia, we had a backup after Jenkins got hurt. This year, we had backups on field.

I'm not as concerned about our starting five....which I think is actually pretty decent (not horrible). My concern is about what happens when we have that second injury. Who is going to be lining up for us then ?

I'd like to see the Packers cut ties with Jenkins, use a Day 2 pick on a starting caliber lineman, and get a veteran OL in Free Agency. If that veteran is Rhyan, that's fine.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

January 28, 2026 at 10:25 am

So this article states that we need at minimum 4 new O Linemen and lets say we bring in 3 CBs. That leaves one draft pick left. Yes I know we can pick up our own FAs but remember the FAs we get will be at best the ones we sign from the second wave because we have no money for the first wave. That means we have to sign UDFAs and generally speaking you are lucky to get 2 of 15 to work out to be good players and usually that is in year 2 at best but usually year 3.

So how can anyone say we will be better next year?

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

January 28, 2026 at 10:55 am

Losing LT Walker, C Rhyan, G-C Jenkins, and possibly swing T Kinnard this offseason, no $ to spend in free agency, gaping holes at DT & CB, and no 1st round pick for a team that rarely gets production out of its rookies anyway, yeah the OL will be much better next year.

Get ready for the Jacob Monk and Travis Glover are gonna take a jump stories to keep hope alive among the fan base.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 28, 2026 at 01:53 pm

Irrespective of anything that we do, or don't do, on defense, if we can score another 100 points next season we'll probably make it to the Championship game.

If we did nothing to improve on defense, but got Parsons and Wyatt back healthy, and resigned Enagbare and Walker, then we'd have an above average defense.

IMO, the first focus should be to put a real good, deep, offensive line together in front of Love and Jacobs. All the other stuff, on offense and defense, is less critical, IMO.

0 points
0
0
retirerodgets's picture

January 29, 2026 at 05:34 pm

Morgan at left t ackle is an upgrade over Walker and his holding and false,start penalties. His poor play in the second half helped cost us the Bears game . Rhyan was serviceable at center. Guard remains an issue with Banks. Maybe one of the young guys will step up. I would love to see them cut V anks but I dont think they hsve a replacement.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

January 28, 2026 at 10:26 am

Kalani, you pretty much said what I'm thinking. (You didn't mention Belton in your fourth paragraph, and I really wonder what Gute was thinking when they picked him--He SEEMS like a good RT candidate, but they kept playing him at LT in the preseason...)
The big X-Factor question is, "What do they really think about Monk, Glover, and Williams?"
We fans really know almost nothing about them.

Personally, I would cut Jenkins, Walker, and Banks.
I would re-sign Rhyan and Kinnard.
I would VERY seriously consider taking Connor Lew or Brian Parker (centers) as early as our first pick (52). That allows us to play Rhyan at center for 26, if the rookie needs time, (and then Rhyan moves to guard in '27).
It's also quite possible that they see Monk as their next center, backed up by J Williams...it's impossible for us to know.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

January 28, 2026 at 10:29 am

I anticipate GB offering Rhyan a certain amount that they won’t exceed. If he can do much better as a FA, adios!

0 points
0
0
mjbrogno's picture

January 28, 2026 at 10:33 am

Let’s keep this simple, stop the so call cross training OL. Morgan was drafted in the first round to play left tackle. Two years later he has not played one snap at the position. This up coming season we will see if he’s our left tackle of the future.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 28, 2026 at 01:56 pm

Morgan was drafted to be our starting LT someday, and some day is here. Morgan played guard because we needed somebody at guard and he was better than any other option.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

January 29, 2026 at 08:37 am

In addition, wasn’t he was injured in year 1? This year with Tom and Wallace they had the tackle position locked in so why not teach him a new position? Versatility is the name of the game in today’s NFL.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 29, 2026 at 10:14 am

Because then you have to start giving credit to people. It ruins the narratives of "Morgan should have never been drafted, he's a bust", and "Butkus is no good".

In his second season, Morgan was both durable and versatile. That sounds like an improvement from his rookie year.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

January 28, 2026 at 11:03 am

Whatever the FO does at the draft and FA, come preseason, and possibly before, this team will reign supreme on paper. Then reality starts to rear its often too truthful head, and the screams start, and the paper tigers burn themselves once again at the stove they likely didn't deserve to be near in the first place. This team needs much to be even, an on paper beast, because the stock it's being written on is not close to standard paper. Yes, the weak entries into the playoffs is a not a positive when it bites you every year, it's a warning that is ignored every year come August. We are not good in the trenches on either side, convince yourselves otherwise, but they simply aren't. It's the reason they lose every year, the games that matter.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

January 28, 2026 at 11:30 am

FYI, GB could get a killer deal on paper from Dunder-Mifflin.
Just sayin’.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

January 28, 2026 at 12:07 pm

LOL!!!

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

January 28, 2026 at 06:22 pm

😊

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

January 28, 2026 at 11:43 am

Yes the Packers need to invest some draft capital in their OL. I just wish I had more confidence in Butkus being able to coach and develop them. I would prefer a new OL coach before they draft anyone.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

January 28, 2026 at 11:46 am

The problems with the Packers OL is a situation of Gute's own making. He significantly overpaid Banks for no reason and the musical chairs with the OL players is absurd since some of them have yet to become solidified in their best position,e.g. Morgan at LT. I realize that some of the problem rests with the coaching staff particularly Butkus and Stenovich but MLF is culpable also. I would have moved Tom to Center in 2025 instead of Jenkins and left Jenkins at LG wit Morgan at LT and Walker moved to RT. I still believe that would have resulted in a much better OL for the 2025 season and beyond especially since the Packers own OL coaches saw Tom as a potential HOF Center. But that's water under the bridge now.

The Packers need to figure out who they have as their 5 best OL and get them through training camp and onto the field when the season begins. Musical chairs needs to stop with the OL unless and until injuries leave the team with no choice.

I agree with the author that the most likely starting 5 in 2026 with be Morgan, Banks, Rhyan, Belton and Tom. We'll see what the Packers come up with especially if Banks is a cap casualty and Rhyan leaves in FA. In any case figuring out the OL is the biggest issue the Packers face during this offseason. The offense goes as far as their OL takes them and essentially that is true for as far as the entire team will go. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

January 28, 2026 at 12:08 pm

It seems that Musical Chairs is the only tune/game they know, and don't want to learn another.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 28, 2026 at 03:00 pm

Right now, the starting 5 would be Morgan,Banks, MONK, Belton and Tom.

I agree 100% that the OL is the biggest issue, and I'd include the OL backups, because they're on the field when our season ends, year after year.

I don't think Banks was over paid; I think he was paid like the top interior linemen FA that he was. He was injured when the season started, and it set him back, but he played in all the games after he got healthy and he played pretty well. The price tag of $20M is kind of what veteran starting offensive linemen go for if they're good.

He's a $25M cap hit, but he's also $20M in dead money. His contract was structured so he was only a $9M hit last year. The question I have is who is the person that we're using to upgrade the position?

Tom, Banks, Morgan, Belton....all of them under contract for a couple of years.. Add to this group. We could draft a LT in the second round. Or a Center. We could release Jenkins and using the savings to sign a quality vet. Maybe Rhyan. That's what makes the most sense to me.

That's a lot of stability, if they all stay healthy.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

January 29, 2026 at 10:45 am

I see Tom as our best T. For that reason I’d move him to the blind side now Walker is likely gone. Perhaps they won’t, but he ended up on the right more out of need than preplanning. As he’s our best by some way, id move him now. He played LT not RT after he moved from C.

I think Belton has the makings of a very good G. It’s a disgrace that we kept insisting he was a T till mid season and that obviously held him back. The same is true of Morgan, except he’s a T if he’s anything. At times he looked promising after moving to T. If we keep Kinnard, he’s a G, as the Eagles had concluded and his relative lack of athleticism suggests.

Banks is an odd one. He was much better before he came. Then he was clearly hurt and then he was massively up or down. So I don’t know if he’s simply a terrible pick up (cost aside), had a season undermined by physical issues or a red flag for our coaching/OL scheme-a sort of reverse Myers and Nijman, who both proved better elsewhere. At this point I’m going to assume we keep him. If not it’s an early draft pick most likely.

So I project Tom, Banks, Monk/Rhyan/FA, Belton, Morgan is my guess. Monk was a surprising positive in the last game versus the Vikings, but that’s one game only (he wax injured early in the playoff game on STs I think). Rhyan would need to come at a reasonable cost.

Behind that we have Glover, whom they seem to have now figured out is a RT finally and actually seemed to go some way to justifying that in preseason, Jennings who was messed up trying to learn C in the summer and then injured before we could see him against the Vikings, and perhaps Kinnard as a G on a cheap deal.

On the PS we’ve got Dalton whom I liked and was a pre draft visit, but as a G not a T as we list him and Brant Banks, who got me was the unsung star of the summer at LT. I don’t have much knowledge of Barnhart.

How bad a group is that? I actually think it should be better than most seem to. The key here is not playing players away from natural positions and having at least one player behind the first 5 make a jump.

On paper there’s talent behind. In the past we were good at creating something with that. We have to now, be it Jennings G/Dalton G /Glover RT/Brant Banks LT/Barnhart G. Add Williams, our 7th rounder (in part I think due to his medical status) red shirt, a G, to that mix. Two would be better.

In the past we were good at developing such players. In recent years we have been totally unsuccessful. That has to change. We need to see progress from the pencilled in starters not named Tom too of course. We’ve also been very poor at that recently.

0 points
0
0
GreenandBold's picture

January 28, 2026 at 12:00 pm

I see the Packers sticking with Banks . I mean it is the Packers way under current regime . Keep players or fill in the ______ blank that don’t live up to their contracts .

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

January 28, 2026 at 12:57 pm

Agree Since 61. "The problems with the Packers OL is a situation of Gute's own making. He significantly overpaid Banks for no reason and the musical chairs with the OL players is absurd since some of them have yet to become solidified in their best position,e.g. Morgan at LT. I realize that some of the problem rests with the coaching staff particularly Butkus and Stenovich but MLF is culpable also."

The Banks acquisition, and for that matter the Hobbs-CB contract as well, were really huge mistakes that everyone was questioning last year. I remember reading many times that both were essentially 1 year contracts that GB could easily get out of. I am calling BS on that as saving only $4 million by releasing Banks, and even less by cutting Hobbs is not even worthwhile.

When we signed Banks to this boat anchor of a contract, with the idea we could easily get out of it if need be, my immediate thought was "Why don't we just sign Brandon Scherff-Jaguars OG who was coming off another solid season and was said to have been available for $5 to $7 million for a year? He hadn't missed any time in years. We would be looking now, maybe, but we would have $$$ available.

I have asked this question before with no answer yet. Is Sean Rhyan a better center than Josh Myers was? Did we effectively get an upgrade? I think he is and we should try to resign him if the money is what is being predicted, $6-$7 million per year. Rhyan is still young, and can play OC & both OG spots. That is worth something. He isn't getting worse either, maybe he has found his permanent spot. Solid Centers are hard to find. Last year only a few FAs were available and got big bucks. Don't even get me started on Creed Humphries. The Raiders have all new management & coaching and they won't be tied to former picks. Maybe they would trade Jackson Powers Johnson, last years best OC. He has been playing some OG instead for them. Maybe a 4th or 5th round pick pries him loose.?

Monk is a big question mark. If he isn't even a fair backup then we need to move on.

Maybe it's time to start drafting OL that actually play the position we are looking for.

That said, OL that I like in this draft where we will be picking them:
J C Davis-OT-Illinois
Febechi Nwaiwu-OG-Oklahoma
DJ Campbell-OG-Texas
Dave Iuli-OG-Oregon
Ar'maj Reed-Adams-OG-Texas A&M
Fernando Carmona Jr.-OG-Arkansas
Diego Pounds-OT-Ole Miss
Alex Harkey-OT-Oregon
Jake Slaughter-OC-Florida

0 points
0
0
Tlatum21's picture

January 28, 2026 at 01:17 pm

If Tucker Kraft and Micah Parsons come back strong and stay on the field, the 2026 Packers will in the thick of contention for the Super Bowl. Tucker Kraft gave the offense a passing dimension and run blocking it was not able to replace after he went down. Micah Parsons made opposing teams game plan blocking schemes that limited their pass receiving threats.

In many ways, overcoming injuries is the name of the game in the NFL today, but there are just some injuries no team can overcome. For the 2025 Packers, that was the story.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

January 28, 2026 at 05:53 pm

Yeah Tiatum21, Kraft was a monumental loss for us. I am not trying to toot my own horn, and I wish I wouldn't have been right, but before last years draft I said TE is a not so sneaky need because GB was betting Kraft would not get injured all year. I said at the time we were playing with fire because Musgrave had been so undependable and had really shown us nothing his first 2 years. I thought we should sign a reasonable veteran TE, New England had 2 FAs that were really good but were older. I wish I wouldn't have been such a prophet.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

January 28, 2026 at 01:21 pm

I think coaching staff that can develop our linemen is more urgent than acquiring more linemen.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 28, 2026 at 03:05 pm

Which linemen need to be developed? Monk?

I think that Tom, and Walker, and Rhyan and Morgan and Belton all developed into competent NFL starters. Who are these linemen that aren't being developed?

0 points
0
0
Packerlifer's picture

January 28, 2026 at 09:50 pm

The best chefs can't make chicken salad with chicken manure.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

January 29, 2026 at 08:53 am

Well Sic, we still need to have a full room of OL to be able to coach and have an actual next man up. Not only are we losing Jenkins, Walker, and maybe Rhyan, but we have really limited resources to replace them. The draft is really our only option to add anyone and it won't be until 4th round at the earliest. I know we have had success doing that but it's risky to rely solely on that tool.

We have to cut Jenkins and trade/cut Gary just to get solvent at this point.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

January 28, 2026 at 01:51 pm

"Drafting another tackle convert to fit in there in the near future should absolutely be on the table"

Or maybe just draft the best actual IOL and play him at IOL and stop trying to fit square pegs into round holes on the OL all the time. We need to get some mauling, brawling, mean ass, meat heads inside moving people back. In other words, we need to draft or find guys from that position who have shown vast amounts of production. This moving people around all over the line tells me one thing only, that they don't have "THE" guy who can do it. Taking a finesse tackle in the draft and trying to make him a mauler inside is not a method, it is mere madness.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

January 28, 2026 at 01:54 pm

What would TT do-
I'll just come out and say it.
He'd Dump Banks and Jenkins.
And wouldn't resign R. Walker now.
He'd draft a center and offer a contract to Rhyan.
Thats what cheap TT would do.

Tom must move.
Did he help last year? - No
But moving him.
Might keep him off the IR.
(And the versatility is there.)
I'd put him at LG /LT now.
Because he can protect Love better than anyone.

Belton stays on the Right side.
And Morgan is either the RT/LT

Regardless these guys all have versatility.
The ones cut don't. Draft the OL....

Spend the money on Defense.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

January 28, 2026 at 04:48 pm

"What would TT do?"
********
He wouldn't be in this situation.

Because he drafted 5 Pro Bowl lineman in the 4th and 5th rounds.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

January 29, 2026 at 04:54 am

True ! - - You are correct.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

January 29, 2026 at 06:23 am

I get lucky 2 or 3 times a year. 😲

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

January 28, 2026 at 02:43 pm

At present - with salary cap issues, thin depth and expected departing players - the O-line is less than status quo. Nor should any 2026 drafted players be relied upon for any significant contributions. Thus leaving free agency (with limited funds) and the hopeful progress of Tom, Belton, Banks and Morgan. Also whatever a new O-line coach can bring in terms of scheme and attitude. So more 'unknowns' than not - making any short and long-term O-line projections a large question mark. In other words - the 'problem child' ain't going nowhere for a while.

0 points
0
0
Rebelgb's picture

January 29, 2026 at 07:59 am

Offensive Lineman in the NFL today often start right away as rookies. Its one of the few positions rookies start all the time.

0 points
0
0
THESZOTMAN1's picture

January 28, 2026 at 04:19 pm

Great article, Kalani. You've hit the nail squarely on the head. Upgrade O-Line by addition and subtraction--- Or you get more of this year.
Here's my thumbnail sketch: Gotta cross our fingers and move Morgan to LT. That's why he was drafted #1.
Walker must go. Mediocre season. Let somebody else pay him. Jenkins, too. Same reasoning. I'd make a reasonable tender for Rhyan, but we can't break the bank. And speaking of Banks, what were we thinking with $77 mill deal? Because of that, we can't take the hit for cutting him this year. But if he doesn't play a LOT better, cut our losses. Kinnard's a keeper. Decent backup with experience. Can he start? Good question. Tom, of course, is solid. Moving him makes no sense to me. But can he stay healthy? Belton's a 2nd round pick. Time to start earning his money at RG. Even if all that holds together, we still got big trouble with depth. Monk is an enigma. Can't count on him. Same with Williams and Glover. So we have to draft another versatile Bahktiari in later rounds. I hope the football Gods smile on GB again.
GPG
The Szotman

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

January 28, 2026 at 04:59 pm

"......the 2026 starting lineup is already mostly set. From left to right, Green Bay’s line will almost certainly be Jordan Morgan, Aaron Banks, Sean Rhyan, Anthony Belton and Zach Tom." - K J
********
Is everyone comfortable with that?
Is that the new secret sauce to the SB recipe?
******
KJ..You described Elton Jenkins as 'rock solid' (Left guard)
PFF surely agrees with you.

So should we dump him for money savings, or try to rework something (kick the can?) and keep him around?

Not so sure Morgan Jordan is our LT of the future, although he'd have a better chance with Jenkins next to him, imo.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

January 28, 2026 at 06:16 pm

A potential reclamation project is former Browns #10 pick in the 2020 draft, Jedrick Wills-OT. He was selected over Tristen Wirfs that year. Wills was a 1st team All-American RT or Alabama. The Browns started him right away switching him to LT where he struggled. Wills allowed 1 sack in 930 pass attempts @ Alabama so he was a solid player for them. He started 52 games for the Browns mainly @ OT and OG so he has versatility.

GB has very little cap space so I thought this might be relevant because we will be scraping the lower 1/4 of the barrel this year to have a solid OL room. The Browns misused Wills, hard to believe because they have been such a great organization. Ha Ha. Wills should be fully recovered from knee surgery that sidelined him in 2025. Just a low cost/possible big return option on a prove deal.

0 points
0
0
bjb2012sime's picture

January 28, 2026 at 10:38 pm

There are lots of hypotheticals in evaluating GM's draft selections, but an undeniable verdict on Gutekunst was him selecting Myers immediately before Humphrey was chosen. He was wrong, catastrophically so. I hope he and his staff did a review of what led to that decision.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

January 29, 2026 at 08:42 am

You’re right, but guess what, every team every year and look back at the draft and say why didn’t we take _______, fill in the blank. Nobody bats 1000, in fact, 300 is pretty good.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

January 29, 2026 at 08:40 am

Gutey has done well in FA overall, but last year Dobbs and Banks were puzzling from the start. Both are oft injured, that alone makes you scratch your head. Gutey what were you thinking?

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

January 29, 2026 at 09:13 am

1000% Murf, Both of those signing were quick and grossly overpaid. I said in an earlier post that signing veteran FA OG Brandon Scherff instead last year to a $12 million 2 year contract seems like a no brainer since he is still solid and rarely misses games. Do that and then add $4 million to the $12 million we paid Hobbsand just buy one of the best CBs available would have changed our outlook. We knew we were going to lose Alexander, so why not upgrade the position with a true outside CB, Hobbs isn't even a true outside CB.

Posters bitch when anyone brings up hindsight, but rating services alone are somewhat in agreement on prospects usually. It would be very easy to name a bunch of examples of us over drafting lower rated players because we knew something that justified it, Creed Humphrey being the worst ever. Obviously there is a big flaw in talent evaluation, Some choices are just very easy and don't need to be overthink. Just pick the best one.

0 points
0
0
mdswhankhan420's picture

January 29, 2026 at 11:41 am

NFL 2026 Super Bowl LX Sunday
New affiliated ....iS Here
➡️ Copy and paste in your search bar ➡️ bb-ustv.com/nfl/

0 points
0
0