Block!

I think that what you'll see on offense is going to be just what we've seen the last several years: Motion, Misdirection, the Illusion of Complexity. Ball goes to the RB half the time. We'll run some jet sweeps and even have the TE carry the ball. We'll throw to Kraft. We'll throw some WR screens. And we'll demand that the opponent respects our ability to throw downfield.

As always, of course, we'll have to get people blocked.

what can you do when you have a QB throwing erratic throws, panicking when rushers get too closer?
slow legs, low IQ, fearful....
but Matt you said ok that 2020 April night when you gutey and Murphy decided to kick in the ass your HoF QB to trade up for this asshole.

so now survive this mediocrity.

I usually don't listen to the videos but I did this one, and I think it's a great summary of the off-season and what's swirling around the offense.

What I found most interesting--and this was later in the reel, maybe 24:00--was Andy Herman talking about "zig" vs. "zag" with some teams using multi-TE sets as passing formations (see: Rams), and where the Packers are with it. This is something I've been intrigued by, and Andy basically says that if you don't have true Y TEs, this doesn't work, because you need guys who are a threat to block and a threat to catch passes...otherwise, if you've got Musgraves and Whyles who are not good run blockers, you're really not threatening run by going TE heavy. Several of us have been calling for another playable Y, and we get Luke Lachey who Andy essentially disregards, but the Packers paying Reed and Watson essentially signal running the other way from this league shift. No real discussion here on how the use of Kraft might shift if he signs a big contract.

Savion Williams and Watson both have size and can be outside blockers who bully DBs, but Golden and Reed are not. The Packers like to rotate WRs and WR groups, so I think we can project an expanded role for Williams...maybe we see more run-down personnel groupings with Watson-Williams?