Packers Snap Counts V. Chicago: Week 18, 2023
Packers dominate in the tre
The Packers placed WR Samori Toure and DB Rudy Ford on the injured reserve list and activated TE Luke Musgrave and RB Emanuel Wilson to the 53-man roster. The Packers also released DB David Long.
The Packers elevated WR Grant Dubose for today's game, but listed Dubose as an inactive player when it turned out that Jayden Reed and Dontayvion Wicks would be able to play. The healthy scratches were OT Caleb Jones, OLB Brenton Cox, and Dubose. WR Christian Watson, ILB Isaiah McDuffie, and RB AJ Dillon were inactiven due to injury. QB Sean Clifford and RB Wilson did not play.
Player | Snaps | % | STs |
Myers | 60 | 100 | 4/22% |
Walker | 60 | 100 | 4/22% |
Jenkins | 60 | 100 | |
Tom | 48 | 80 | 4/22% |
Runyan | 31 | 52 | 4/22% |
Rhyan | 29 | 48 | |
Nijman | 12 | 20% | 4/22% |
Newman | 4/22% |
The offensive line won in the trenches against the Bears; indeed, they dominated. Superior play by the offensive line has been a big factor in the surge to get into the playoffs. The Packers gained 5.21-yards per carry, excluding QB quarterback scramble and 2 kneel downs. The line only allowed three tackles for loss. Pass protection was superb. The Packers allowed just 1 quarterback hit, which was a sack by DeMarcus Walker against Rasheed Walker.
That said, the recent performance by the line doesn't mean that the Packers should not be in the market for offensive linemen during the off-season and during the draft.
Player | Snaps | % | STs |
Kraft | 54 | 90 | 8/44% |
Sims | 12 | 20 | 4/22% |
Musgrave | 9 | 15 | |
Deguara | 7 | 12 |
Tucker Kraft caught all 3 of his targets for 31 yards. He caught a pass on a scramble drill to move the chains late in the game to keep the clock moving. Yes, he should have gotten out of bounds earlier in the game. His blocking continues to improve. Kraft cannot yet play inline and be relied upon to block an edge defender with his hand in the dirt on a consistent basis, but he is making progress. Luke Musgrave appeared to play only in obvious passing situations. It was good to see the Packers ease him back in. Musgrave ca9ught his only target for 11 yards. It was an important catch as it helped get Green Bay out of the shadow of their own goal line late in the game. Sims and Deguara had no statistics.
Player | Snaps | % | STs |
Jones | 49 | 82 | |
Taylor | 11 | 18 | 8/44% |
Aaron Jones gained 111 yards on 22 carries for a 5.0-yard average. He added 30 yards on 5 receptions. He competently handled some blitz pickups. The Packers can threaten the edges and run between the tackles. Jones turns so-so blocks into nice gains and good blocking into chunk plays. Patrick Taylor did not have a touch, while Emanuel Wilson did not play. I have little doubt that a healthy Dillon gets some snaps and some touches, but I think they would have been Taylor’s snaps.
The Packers should try to bring Jones back for his age-29 season in 2024 even if it is mostly a max void year restructure. They can easily add some incentives that would not count against the initial salary cap next March. Much depends on Jones’ attitude and his market; I couldn’t blame Jones if he wanted one last 3-year deal for bigger money with a good-sized dollop of guaranteed money. Either way, the Packers should be looking to draft his heir apparent on day 2 or early on day 3 next April.
Player | Snaps | % | STs |
Love | 60 | 100 | |
Clifford | DNP |
Jordan Love was outstanding. Love completed 27 of 32 passes (84.375%) for 316 yards (9.875-yards per attempt), with 2 touchdowns (it could have been 3 or 4 TDs) and no interceptions. His passer rating was 128.6.
Love had at least 4 big-time throws, two of which were not caught. I saw Love change plays and/or the lines’ protection: I do know whether the initial call wo9uld have worked but the changes had positive outcomes. The ball came out on time. Love threw nice passes even if he had to change his arm angle and he completed passes off-schedule as well.
Jordan Love earned millions in 2024 escalators, to be sure. He also earned tens of millions in guaranteed money.
Player | Snaps | % | STs |
Melton | 45 | 75 | |
Wicks | 43 | 72 | |
Reed | 36 | 60 | 3/17% |
Heath | 23 | 38 | |
Doubs | 11 | 18 |
That looks like a good wide receiver room. Reed might be the best wide receiver (unless it is Wicks) on this team, and arguably would have been on the 2022 squad as well. The only issue with Reed is finding a way to keep him on the field when the Packers go to 12 or 21 personnel. If he is a slot only, that would be a shame even though he would still be very valuable. The pecking order might be Reed, Watson, Wicks, Melton, Doubs (for now), Heath, Toure, and the unknown Dubose. Or not.
Reed caught all 4 of his targets for 112 yards. Wicks caught 6 of 7 for 61 yards, including both touchdown passes. Melton caught 5 of his 7 targets for 62 yards. He might have had a TD but he could not come down with a gorgeous pass from Love. I will be watching Melton to see if he can haul in contested catches. Heath caught three passes for 9 yards. Doubs had no receptions and left the game early. He did not return. Doubs seems to double-clutch a lot of his receptions.
Player | Snaps | % | STs |
Clark | 40 | 83 | |
Wyatt | 27 | 56 | 5/28% |
Slaton | 26 | 54 | 9/50% |
Brooks | 18 | 38 | 6/33% |
Wooden | 9 | 19 | 4/22% |
The offensive line had an excellent day, but the defensive line played ridiculously well. Brooks, Clark and Wooden had 4 tackles for loss. The Packers had a whopping 10 altogether. Brooks, Clark, and Wyatt had 3 of the Packers' 5 sacks. They held the Bears to 3.0-yards per carry. They did it by playing a season high 2.50 true defensive linemen per play. Who knew?
Player | Snaps | % | STs |
Walker | 48 | 100 | 2/11% |
Campbell | 38 | 79 | 5/28% |
Smith | 36 | 75 | |
Gary | 35 | 73 | |
Enagbare | 13 | 27 | 10/56% |
Van Ness | 12 | 25 | 6/33% |
Wilson | 6/27% | ||
Welch | 9/50% |
Walker had 9 tackles and a sack. Campbell had 8 tackles. Each had a TFL. Enagbare had 2 TFL and Gary had 1. Gary drew a holding call and was called for being offside. Smith, Enagbare, and sometimes Gary held the edge well.
Player | Snaps | % | STs |
Owens | 48 | 100 | 9/50% |
Alexander | 48 | 100 | 1/6% |
Savage | 47 | 98 | |
Valentine | 44 | 92 | 5/28% |
Nixon | 31 | 65 | 8/44% |
Ballentine | 4 | 8 | 9/50% |
A Johnson | 4 | 8 | 4/22% |
Rochell | 9/50% | ||
Anderson | 9/50% | ||
Sapp | 4/22% |
I was happy to Alexander be so physical. Owens and Nixon laid some wood, as well. The only receiver to do much was DJ Moore, and 31 of his 64 yards came on a crosser with Quay Walker in coverage. The Bears could not dial up enough of those types of mismatches.
SPECIAL TEAMS
Carlson missed a 41-yard field goal. The snap wasn't perfect, but it didn't seem that bad. The kickoff return unit allowed a few somewhat long returns, though nothing dire.
Stats courtesy of NFLgsis.
Photo courtesy of Wm. Glasheen, USA Today
TE: 1.37
WR: 2.63
RB: 1.00
DL: 2.50
ILB: 1.79
OLB: 2.00
DB: 4.71
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Comments (65)
Cubbygold
January 08, 2024 at 06:06 am
I don't know what's going on. Giving up 30 to Carolina only to watch that team get shut out in back to back games to close the season. Then I turn around and this team is playing aggressive clutch football in must win games. Watching this defense makes me feel like I'm in the Seinfeld episode where George loses his glasses.
"you're eating onions, you're spotting dimes, I don't know what the hell is going on"
All I know is it would be very fun if the defense came out and played aggressive again in Dallas.
Houndog
January 08, 2024 at 07:07 am
Cubby,
I'm with you, I don't know what's going on. Maybe the Alexander suspension woke something or someone up. Maybe MLF saying he would be getting more involved in the defense actually happened. Maybe Barry's no longer calling the defensive plays, it kinda' looked like that when they kept showing the coaches box in the Minny game.
Whatever it is, I'm all for it, but I can't help but cringe at the thought of it saving Barry's job, the handwriting is on the wall and it's clear, he's not NFL material.
As for MLF, I almost stutter, I don't know.
He was more animated yesterday than usual, and that was good to see. It does appear that "His" offensive system is working and we certainly like what we saw yesterday. Yeah , there was a few glitches, drops, and a fumble, but as TGR said, Love looked great. None of the 'I don't throw to rookies' attitude there, Jones was a stud, and no punts!
The offense deserves better than Joe Barry, and I hope MFL sees that looking forward.
murf7777
January 08, 2024 at 08:47 am
Maybe, the bears just suck:)
Bitternotsour
January 08, 2024 at 12:28 pm
well. that can't be discounted.
Coldworld
January 08, 2024 at 05:08 pm
They did yesterday, In pretty much all facets but STs.
WestCoastPackerBacker
January 08, 2024 at 10:53 am
I am so over the "I don't throw to rookies" theme. It's just not even true. Watson was 2nd in the league in rookie TDs last year and Doubs was tied for third. Watson was 5th in yards and Doubs would have been higher but he missed a bunch of time. MVS had just under 600 yards as a rookie. Rodgers threw to rookies all the time; he just demanded they know their responsibility on the field, and that turned out to be a good thing. When Love was having the worse part of his season with low completion and lots of picks, it was clear the WRs were not on the same page with him.
Rodgers spread the ball around just fine when he had a stable of playmakers like Love has now. They just refused to spend any high picks on decent WRS, leaving Rodgers with guys like Equanimeous St. Brown, MVS, Lazard, Jeff Janis, around Davante Adams. If Rodgers had this current crew, it would have been like the days of Jordy, James Jones, Cobb and Davante.
Cubbygold
January 08, 2024 at 11:28 am
Maybe.
Are the young receivers this year good because they were destined to be good? Or are they good because Love took the time to get them all on the same page and they had enough playing time together to get on the same page by week 18?
How does Rodgers demanding the team sign a slow Cobb help to allow Rodgers to build a connection with younger receivers?
How big of an influence did Love have on the WR development by having Doubs, Watson, Reed and Wicks out to his house over the summer for practice? What stopped 12 from doing that?
12 was a great QB. He could have done more to help the situation than he chose to do.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:07 pm
Exactly!
Notice how our 3 speed guys (Melton Watson and Reed) have emerged in the WR room? If JL practices with them in the off-season and they're in top form on day 1 of OTAs, they can start working on contested catches immediately. That will also help the DBs.
Another grouping that could practice together would be Wicks and DuBose, they both clocked a 4.57 40. (Davonte Adams was 4.56)
Doubs and Toure are 4.47 and 4.43, respectively.
Heath is slower than both rookie TEs.
All of these could play catch as groups with the other 2 QBs too, but JL needs reps with all of them to adjust to their speed and individual route running.
Thegreatreynoldo
January 09, 2024 at 01:27 am
Perhaps. Just remember you are hanging your opinion on an assertion that cannot be proved or disproven.
jannesbjornson
January 08, 2024 at 02:07 pm
That's about it. The other narratives are from parrots.
Guam
January 08, 2024 at 07:47 am
When Barry implements an aggressive game plan, the defense plays well. So clearly the Packers have the personnel to play a more aggressive blitz/press man game plan. Why does he consistently revert to the Charmin soft bend and then break defense he seems to love so much?
My sense is that Barry schemes from fear, not confidence. He is so concerned about getting beaten over the top that he is willing to allow teams to march up and down the field at will just so he doesn't give up a big play. That has to be demoralizing for his players. I would much rather give up the occasional big play and play aggressive defense (and get some three and outs) than play chicken defense.
Given Dak and CeeDee Lamb, my fear is that Barry will revert to defending out of fear rather than confidence next week. That soft zone is a death knell.
dobber
January 08, 2024 at 08:59 am
"When Barry implements an aggressive game plan, the defense plays well. "
The energy level of the D is so much better in an aggressive game plan, too. You can read it in their body language and in how they play.
Still, this defense has been horrible at forcing TOs. You'd think that more aggressive plan would start to pile up TOs, but not for this team. If you can't force and take advantage of TOs, it's hard to win in the playoffs.
"Given Dak and CeeDee Lamb, my fear is that Barry will revert to defending out of fear rather than confidence next week. "
Not only Lamb, but Ferguson also will feast on a soft zone if the Packers go that route next week. When it comes to predictions, I'm no Carmac the Magnificent, but if I had to bet I think Barry will go with the soft zones against Dallas...actually, I thought he would do this against Fields, but I was wrong. So what do I know?
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:14 pm
This is why JB has to go, no matter what. Gutey has drafted aggressive players. How many games have they lost because our D has played too aggressively? It's really easy to keep track of each loss this season: the streak of 4, one on each side of the bye, and the recent two against the Giants and Bucs.
JB fears the big play, and gives up big plays anyway. Losing the game each time. Playing aggressively hasn't cost GB one game, he's just too stupid to be able to figure that out. Let him win in Dallas and it's still pitchforks and torches time!
tobinrote
January 08, 2024 at 06:12 am
did Barry finally listen to all the screaming fans and get some extra beef up front and play some man to man? remember though this is the Bears, but how refreshing to see us actually win in the trenches, even when clock management and challenging decisions seem to make MLF as untrustworthy an in game coach as was McCarthy
Bitternotsour
January 08, 2024 at 12:31 pm
no. the fans had nothing to do with it.
execution was the issue, and they've been executing the last two weeks. blitzes got home. timing got better.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:16 pm
Defensive scheme and playcalling is part of it.
Coldworld
January 08, 2024 at 05:18 pm
I believe the Onion may even have noticed how inescapable that truth is.
PackEyedOptimist
January 08, 2024 at 06:23 am
This is going to be an interesting matchup; I've said from the beginning that my best comparison for Jordan Love, was/is Dak Prescott. And what RB in the league is the most like Aaron Jones? Tony Pollard. Both teams have good OL and pass rush.
Dallas is at home and is a more experienced team, but the Packers are very much a younger version of them.
murf7777
January 08, 2024 at 08:49 am
I certainly hope Jordan becomes better in the playoffs than Dak. Dak hasn’t shown to be able to handle the pressure of the playoffs.
dobber
January 08, 2024 at 09:01 am
Dallas is a notorious playoff choker, yes.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:18 pm
I think JL10 is not going to be choking in any big moments. I don't expect him to be better than AR12 in every respect, but this one I do!
Coldworld
January 08, 2024 at 06:30 am
When the pressure gets home and we are aggressive enough to even play some man and blitz it works. Play to your strengths and you stand a better chance of a good outcome. As you say TGR, who knew?
Fields was contained and he produced a Fields like day. If he can’t run he doesn’t process fast if his planned options are disrupted. After the first couple of drives when he looked reasonable, it fell apart, he took too many sacks and doesn’t throw away. This time we had the spy that was so oddly missing in games where QBs hurt us with their feet.
Jones is just good: a difference maker. To be honest, I did not think the OL was particularly exceptional, just that the Bears have very little rush threat and Jones can just find cracks inside while stretching vertically because he can get the edge. Jones is going to be an interesting conundrum this off season certainly. He can if he’s healthy, but can he stay healthy often enough? If not, we clearly need a plan B or a vastly better IOL.
Love had a better completion percentage than Favre or Rodgers ever had in a game against the Bears. While I’m not sure I agree on the throw that got Doubs hurt—to me that was probably at best a might perhaps have caught it but unwise throw—Love was improbably good other than the fumble. Now I don’t want to detract from praise, but I think that also says a lot about the Bears D on Sunday. That game was a blowout in all but score. Sorry Brister, I think it was your D that proved fake.
Now it’s the Cowboys. Let’s enjoy what’s coming, be thankful that we have a QB who can help so many receivers turn into weapons as well as adjust in the fly already. There’s plenty of time for looking at what needs to happen to capitalize on this potential after, but now we are here, what’s the point if we don’t just enjoy the ride?
HawkPacker
January 08, 2024 at 07:14 am
Regarding Brisker, I read this morning in our local paper that he felt they could have played or receivers tighter. If so, moron, why didn't you.
He goes on to say he still doesn't respect the packers. He states "I don't really have no respect for them at all". That is perfect. I was always taught that you don't have to like your opponent but if you want to win, you at least have to respect them.
I hope all the Bears feel like that moron Brisker and we will continue to beat their ass! He talks that way and we have beaten them 10 times in a row? Priceless!
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:22 pm
There's a philosophical debate about if champions are made or born. Either way, if da Bares ever got 10% of the class and humility #33 has they might be dangerous!
Thegreatreynoldo
January 08, 2024 at 07:23 am
Some folks have reminded me that Heath had to play defense on Love's pass into the end zone. Yeah, that was turnover worthy. Nice job by Heath.
dobber
January 08, 2024 at 09:06 am
Even the best QB will throw a pick-able ball or two per game. Some get dropped, others get broken up...in this case, it didn't hurt the Packers.
Leatherhead
January 08, 2024 at 09:35 am
IMO, Heath quietly helps the team in unnoticed ways. He's a very solid blocker.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:24 pm
Heath is a FOOTBALL PLAYER! Here's hoping he has a great & long career ...
RCPackerFan
January 08, 2024 at 06:57 am
The one position I was curious to see who played the most snaps was RG. I wasn't paying attention down after down, but every time i looked Rhyan was playing RG. It felt like he played more snaps. Turns out he still only played about half the snaps.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:26 pm
That might mean most of the time our IOL played better was with Rhyan on the field? I don't know. If splitting the snaps works, keep doing it? Fresh legs?
jannesbjornson
January 08, 2024 at 02:24 pm
Rhyan took names. He got the job done.
GregC
January 08, 2024 at 06:59 am
All season we've been comparing Jordan Love's performance to Aaron Rodgers' first season, but in the second half, Love played as well as Rodgers did IN HIS PRIME. It's been astounding to watch. The one big sticking point early in the year was the poor deep balls, but even that has become a non-issue. It seems like he is just not throwing those long bombs anymore. His deeper throws have been on crossing routes or out routes instead of with the receiver running straight down the field. So maybe it's more a case of Love playing to his strengths.
What I really love is that when Love drops back to pass, the ball could go anywhere and to anybody. He has a quick release too. Maybe that's an underrated aspect of his game.
Kudos to the O-line and especially Zach Tom for making Montez Sweat mostly a non-factor in this game.
Also kudos to Tony Romo and Jim Nantz for calling a good game. Was that the first time we've had these guys this season? Romo is a good analyst who does not often indulge in hyperbole or try to upstage the game. My only gripe about the broadcast was that there were too many cut-ins from other games near the end.
murf7777
January 08, 2024 at 08:54 am
I also think Love isn’t throwing the ball deep is because he doesn’t have a real deep threat on the field yet. Once Watson went out so has the deep throws. Might Melton with 4.3 speed develop into one?
dobber
January 08, 2024 at 09:07 am
He's not throwing the ball 40 yards downfield very much, but he's not afraid to go in that 15-25 yard zone. He pushes the ball.
Leatherhead
January 08, 2024 at 09:33 am
He hasn't exactly been on target deep. I remember him yesterday missing a guy who was behind everyone.
Plenty of time to improve that next summer. Right now, I'm happy if he just gets them the ball so they can run with it.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:37 pm
I also don't know if JL has so much improved at easy layups as he has stopped trying those? Haven't seen him missing them lately :)
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:35 pm
Melton should definitely fill the MVS role when #9 is out. They're trying to have him replace Reed, but in the middle of the field we have #85, 88, 33, 28, 18, 83, 86, & 87 all capable. Only 80 & 9 available to fill the MVS role,
(assuming Reed plays slot receiver, which he should) which helps everything even when not targeted.
Coldworld
January 08, 2024 at 05:24 pm
Without Watson we don’t have a tall deep threat with speed. Reed and Melton do damage braking open and running after the catch and that’s been our approach to unleashing them. Melton has actually played considerably more on the perimeter than people assume. Perhaps that’s a wrinkle for a later date.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:41 pm
I wouldn't compare JL to AR12 in his prime just yet. His pre-snap reads have improved greatly. He's at least as mobile. He slides very well. He's learned to throw the ball away to avoid the sack.
Pinpoint accuracy from a mile away might never compare, and that's ok. Who can? AR has league records for a reason. I'm just glad to see JL not trying to thread needles from a mile away as often. He did target some very narrow windows yesterday! No picks and a W, so we can say it worked.
T7Steve
January 08, 2024 at 07:20 am
Does anyone know why Nijman was coming in on the right end not the left? Was Tom hurt and/or on a snap count?
I really thought the non-score at the end of the half was going to come back to haunt us. Glad I was wrong. Don't know why they tried a play with seven seconds left and no time outs.
Did the Packers go the whole game without punting? At the end of the game, I thought back and couldn't remember.
Just keep owning the Bears.
Now on to face a real playoff team who really shows up at their home. Too bad for them we've showed up in their home too. The only thing the Packers have been truly consistent at this season is playing well against good and/or playoff caliber teams and letting bad teams hang around.
Thegreatreynoldo
January 08, 2024 at 07:24 am
No punts by GB.
Guam
January 08, 2024 at 07:35 am
Tom hurt his fingers and had to get them taped early in the game which was why Nijman played several downs at RT.
Esquetoi
January 08, 2024 at 10:27 am
...and it didn't hurt the flow of the offense. Keep up the "mixing in" of personnel on the O-line. It keeps them fresh!
GregC
January 08, 2024 at 07:37 am
The Packers were being aggressive at the end of the half, which is the way most teams play it these days. It's on the players to not get tackled in bounds. I think Love and Wicks both learned something from that play.
It was kind of galling because it reminded me of the end of the game against the Chiefs, when the Chiefs receiver got driven backwards out of bounds and the refs did NOT keep the clock running, as they should have.
murf7777
January 08, 2024 at 08:57 am
I would think Love tried to throw the ball to the players outside position, leading him to the out of bounds. Unfortunately, the ball ended up on the inside of the player. That said, when your that close to the FG try getting a few yards doesn’t make sense and hopefully he learns to just throw that away.
Esquetoi
January 08, 2024 at 10:31 am
Sorry, ball placement is not criticizable on this one. It (5 yard gain) would not matter on any field goal where they were at. It was coaching, and Mat'trick LaFleur's take on the post half-time interview didn't clear the air either. No QB throws a ball intending it to be on the outside shoulder (which does happen) and expects it to actually be there more than 50% of the time. But they will throw it with intent to complete it.
dobber
January 08, 2024 at 11:26 am
There was the one play on that last drive in the first half where Kraft caught the ball at the sideline and ducked back inside to get a couple more yards rather than stepping out and saving time/TOs. Situational awareness? It all adds up.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:46 pm
Hasn't he made that same mistake before?
Coldworld
January 08, 2024 at 05:13 pm
I think that was Taylor
fireball
January 08, 2024 at 07:20 am
I agree with Coldworld, enjoy the ride for what it is.
Yeh, yeh, I know, Love was pretty good. The whole team was generally pretty good against the Bears. But, remember, good as the Packer offense was, it still only scored 17 points. . . against the Bears. . . in Green Bay.
Other thing is, is the Packer defense, lately at least, as good as it is despite Joe Barry?
Packers against Dallas should be a really interesting game, a terrific first test in a playoff game. . . for the Packers that is.
RCPackerFan
January 08, 2024 at 08:29 am
"But, remember, good as the Packer offense was, it still only scored 17 points. . . against the Bears. . . in Green Bay."
One dropped TD, then followed up with a missed FG.
End of half debacle, should have came away with at least 3 more points.
Another TD not ruled TD. I get that it was ruled incomplete after watching the replay, but imo, he had control of the ball and in bounds. He rolls over the ball touches the ground but he had control of it before and after. Should have been a TD imo.
They should have had at least 31 points in this game.
murf7777
January 08, 2024 at 09:04 am
Yes, they totally dominated the Bears. What a great win…..I didn’t care that the Rams won, I wanted to go down to Dallas and take away another win like we have many times since 1995. Than to SF. I still remember pre 1995 when Dallas & SF did it to us for a few years.
Also, Dallas isn’t familiar with us like Detroit would be. Hopefullly, it ends up close and MM doesn’t use the clock appropriately like we all know he struggles with.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:48 pm
The battle of bad clock management bowl!
Tundraboy
January 08, 2024 at 06:22 pm
Yep, at least it's a level playing field for our Coaches this week, lol.
Esquetoi
January 08, 2024 at 10:39 am
Totally agree on your Melton take. Doub's is in the the category, "we ALL don't know the rule on possession on TD passes." Odd that the ground 'can't cause a fumble' on run tackles cannot be applied to catches after establishing two feet down on the END ZONE TURF. The same issue happened in the Carolina game.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:49 pm
Does anybody know what a catch is?!?
Regardless how many calls went against GB this season, 8-8 is pretty good for a building year.
Coldworld
January 08, 2024 at 05:16 pm
No. Not anymore. Not in maybe 15 years.
dobber
January 08, 2024 at 09:12 am
I never expected the Bears game to be high scoring, but based on the stat sheet you wonder how the Packers only scored 17 points. When possessions are as limited as they were yesterday, you've got to get points out of your opportunities--preferably 7s.
The defense made plays, but they surrendered long drives all day, too. Hall/Mullen and now Fields aren't good enough passers to turn long sustained drives into 7s on a regular basis (bend but don't break). Dallas is completely different. They're really good at home and playing well. They're going to score. I have little faith in Barry to slow them down...Packers will need to win a track meet, or hold the ball so long on offense that they keep the score down.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2024 at 01:50 pm
I'd be surprised if JB even slows them down.
vin0770
January 08, 2024 at 09:25 am
Last two games the D line has been incredible on third down with pressure winning one on one’s…and it a TOTAL different defense when that happens.
If the Dallas O line can’t keep them off Dak the defense actually looks good 👍🏼
jannesbjornson
January 08, 2024 at 02:48 pm
Karl Brooks knows how to play football. Drafted below his ranking, he will be a game changer, down the road.
Tundraboy
January 08, 2024 at 06:26 pm
He already is!
Leatherhead
January 08, 2024 at 09:30 am
Thanks for this.
Offensive line. Yes, it's amazing what practicing and playing together can do. I'm glad the team resisted the urge to panic and move guys around. As Bon Jovi reminded us, you've got to hold on to what you've got. And I totally agree that we should improve the offensive line talent....we're losing both Nijman and Runyan. Let's replace them with some better players.
If I read you correctly, we had 10 tackles for loss and Chicago only ran 48 plays?? That's impressive. I think we return 5 pretty good DL for next year, and at least three pretty good edge guys. Add in Walker and that's a pretty good front 6 we can throw at teams.
The WR room? Man, competition for the top 3 spots is going to be brutal next summer, and you're going to have to stay healthy to get one. Doubs had a good rookie season and improved this year. Reed looks like a guy you want on the field, but the same thing is true about Wicks and Melton and Heath. Watson is going to have earn a starting spot, IMO. With better blocking and protection, I think this could be the best passing offense in the league next year.
This was a wonderful season, and now we're in the playoffs, again. Dallas is a better team on both sides of the ball, and they're at home, but as we all know, that doesn't really guarantee anything.
Bitternotsour
January 08, 2024 at 12:40 pm
as they say, you can't go on a playoff run unless you're in the playoffs.
we have as they say in another sport, a hot goalie.
Starrbrite
January 08, 2024 at 06:26 pm
Lame: Justin Fields mocking Packer Nation because there’s not much to do in Green Bay but watch football—right Fields, like 13 Championships worth.
Go Packers!!!