How Is the Packers’ Cornerback Depth Looking?

Packers cornerback room still needs to add a peice.

We are roughly four weeks into the new league year and free agency. The 2025 NFL Draft, set to take place in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is exactly three weeks away. This is the perfect time to examine certain positions on the roster and determine whether the team needs to make any additional moves. The Packers’ roster is fairly balanced in terms of depth across most positions—except one: cornerback.

Currently, the Packers have eight cornerbacks under contract, plus another player who primarily plays as a slot corner but is technically listed as a safety. The cornerbacks on the roster include Nate Hobbs, Keisean Nixon, Carrington Valentine, and Jaire Alexander (though his future with the team is uncertain). The remaining players—Isaiah Dunn, Kamal Hadden, Kalen King, and Kaleb Hayes—round out the depth chart. These players, most of whom spent time on the practice squad, will compete for two or three roster spots this offseason. Additionally, Javon Bullard, who played primarily in the slot last season, gives the Packers flexibility in nickel packages. It’s likely he will continue to fill that role when the team has five defensive backs on the field.

Any discussion about the Packers’ cornerback room must include the caveat that Jaire Alexander is still on the roster, but unlikely to be part of Green Bay’s long-term plans. He has been the subject of trade speculation since the end of last season, and it’s widely believed he will be released if the Packers cannot find a trade partner. At the recent owners’ meetings, GM Brian Gutekunst suggested there is still a chance Alexander remains in Green Bay, but this seems like a strategic move to maintain leverage in trade negotiations. For all intents and purposes, Alexander will likely be playing elsewhere in 2025.

The Packers’ starting cornerback trio will likely be some combination of Nate Hobbs, Keisean Nixon, and Carrington Valentine, with Javon Bullard playing in the slot in nickel packages. The exact alignment—who plays outside versus in the slot—will be determined during training camp, but all four will see significant playing time.

Hobbs, who just signed a four-year, $48 million contract, has the versatility to play both inside and outside. Nixon has publicly stated his desire to be CB1, and with his kick returner duties now in the hands of Mecole Hardman, he will have every opportunity to prove himself. Both Hobbs and Nixon offer the versatility that defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley values, allowing them to move around based on matchups.

Valentine, on the other hand, is a pure outside corner who showed significant improvement as last season progressed. He beat out Eric Stokes for playing time early in the year and became a full-time starter before midseason. His 74.4 coverage grade via Pro Football Focus ranked 26th out of 222 cornerbacks in 2024. Valentine plays a tough, physical style that aligns with Hafley’s philosophy, making him a strong candidate for significant snaps—especially when the Packers deploy dime packages or if Nixon or Hobbs takes on a full-time slot role.

Beyond the expected starters, the Packers’ depth at cornerback is largely unproven.

Kalen King and Kamal Hadden, both 2024 seventh-round picks, played a combined zero snaps last season. Hadden was activated a few times but only logged seven special teams snaps. Isaiah Dunn has played in 17 career NFL games with the Jets and Seahawks but the last of which came in 2023. Kaleb Hayes has yet to appear in an NFL game and is now 26 years old. Neither should be counted on for meaningful defensive snaps and are likely camp competition.

With the departures of Eric Stokes, Corey Ballentine, and Robert Rochell, Green Bay is looking to replace roughly 665 defensive snaps from last season. While it’s possible that King or Hadden steps up after a year in the system, it would not be surprising if the Packers used one of their first three draft picks on a cornerback.

The Packers have already hosted Shavon Revel, a consensus first-round cornerback prospect, for a pre-draft visit. While he could be an option, the team’s significant financial investment in Hobbs and Nixon suggests they want those players on the field as much as possible.

Green Bay loves Keisean Nixon, and with their current personnel, they may look to add a cornerback in Round 3 rather than spending a premium pick at the position. Additionally, expect them to sign several undrafted free agents to compete for depth spots.

A top trio of Hobbs, Nixon, and Valentine, supplemented by a top-100 draft pick, should be sufficient for the 2025 season. If the team stays relatively healthy, the rest of the depth chart may only be needed for special teams. With Jeff Hafley entering his second year as defensive coordinator, Green Bay’s defense should take another step forward—and securing depth at cornerback should be one of the final moves needed to solidify the unit.

 

-Dan Saia

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (20)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Packer_Fan's picture

April 03, 2025 at 02:55 pm

I think this is the year Gute drafts two CB. One in rounds one or two and then another in the latter rounds. When there is a big need, that is what Gute does. For example, three OL and two ILB last year. And then two WR and two TE the year before.

And look for a DT or edge to fill out the early rounds.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 04, 2025 at 10:13 am

Two minimum. Improve the Talent.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

April 03, 2025 at 03:00 pm

Kamal Hadden was a favorite late pick of mine during last year’s mock drafts, so I’m hoping he blossoms.
I expect the Packers will select at least one CB in this draft, but only if they are in the near-BPA range.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2025 at 03:21 pm

Hadden is interesting, but so are Kevin King and Kaleb Hayes.
Hadden was a 6th (by the Chiefs), King a 7th who dropped dramatically like Rasheed Walker had. Both have some skills but questions about long speed, at least as tested. Kaleb Hayes was extremely raw in 2023, but has elite physical talents and plenty of speed. It is quite possible that the Packers see more in one or two of those 3 than many here do.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 04, 2025 at 10:14 am

Scrub Talk.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 03, 2025 at 03:23 pm

I don't understand this notion that bottom-of-the-roster players who are released need to be replaced with draft picks from the first three rounds. These players can be replaced with lower round picks, undrafted free agents, and waiver wire acquisitions. I'm not necessarily against using a high pick on a CB, if the value is too good to pass up, but they have greater needs elsewhere. Nixon and Valentine did a good job last year, with Bullard in the slot, and now they've added Nate Hobbs. I don't get why the addition of Hobbs has done nothing to deter people from thinking the Packers need to spend a high pick on a CB. I view the Aaron Banks signing the same way. They added a starter on the O-line, and now they just need to add depth. Use those high picks for WR, DT, and DE.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

April 04, 2025 at 07:05 am

Don't you think it would be a good idea to draft someone that could be a good starter in the near future and great special teamer? Everyone says they just need depth, but for the depth to work they need to be starting caliber (on a young player's salary) by the time someone gets hurt (example Jenkins in the playoff game with top depth Morgan already hurt).

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

April 03, 2025 at 03:27 pm

A cornerback probably needs to be selected in either the second or third round. Let someone else draft and develop Revel. Yes, he has impressive physical attributes like great arm length, but he's also coming off an ACL and is not a great tackler, which is going to limit him to the boundaries. Also there's a pretty wide gulf between AAC competition and their NFL counterparts, so this makes an early selection here highly speculative in my mind.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 03, 2025 at 03:57 pm

We have Nixon and Valentine returning, both have played quite a few snaps over the last two years, both of them stay healthy . And we've added Hobbs.

Usually, you'd only dress 4 CBs, and maybe have a 5th on the 53 man roster. I'm pretty sure we already have three of our four.

The Fourth....this is a guy who will not play very many snaps from scrimmage unless people get hurt. You'd maybe think that Kaelen King, having been here a year on the practice squad, starts with a little lead over somebody who isn't on the team yet, but it's still an open position, as is the #5 spot that's inactive.

Over the last 15-20 years, I think our best DBs have been guys that we've picked up off of the scrap pile, or drafted on Day 3, or got in free agency. The ones we've taken in the first couple of rounds.....Alexander, Stokes, Randall, Rollins, King, etc......haven't really given us that kind of ROI you'd like to see.

I'm going to prognosticate: Nohl Williams, CB in the 4th round. This will work out nicely with our 2nd round pick, Tyriek Williams, and our 3rd round pick, Savion Williams.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 03, 2025 at 04:42 pm

So many first round CB busts, going all the way back to the Ron Wolf era, and last year's starting outside CBs, who played quite well, were an undrafted player (acquired as an inexpensive free agent) and a 7th round pick. Compare that to all of the second and third round WRs they've drafted who have done well. (All of them?) Are CBs that much harder to judge than WRs?

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 03, 2025 at 04:59 pm

One of Wolf's worst moves was to overreact to Randy Moss lighting them up as a rookie.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 04, 2025 at 10:32 am

Wolf hit on Newsome with a One pick and Doug Evans in the 6th round and Won a Superbowl. His Failure was not paying attention to the Film and drafting Moss. He tried three picks in a row to find a guy(s) to cover the dude.. McKenzie was the best of the group and sherman tried the Low-Ball Game, forcing a trade. Wolf recovered the Vinson fiasco by Stealing, Ahman Green from Holmgren. They had to use another Two Pick to bag Al Harris which was a Blessing. Ahmad Carroll over Chris Gamble goes high on the Panic Room's Wall of Shame. I attended the Moss Show on MNF, 1998, in the Rain and then they had to rub it in by showing the replay on NFL network last evening...The Horror.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

April 03, 2025 at 04:05 pm

I still say that the Packers retain Alexander. If he can stay on the field he provides an excellent CB and minimizes if not eliminates the need to take a CB with an early round pick. Also based on the article by retaining Alexander the Packers will have the depth they need behind and more flexibility for their nickel and dime packages. I would keep Alexander and select a CB from the later rounds to add some depth/insurance at CB.

I don't see another team trading good value for Alexander and cutting him provides the Packers no return. I'd rather try to get another season out of him rather than release him for nothing in return. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
SDPack's picture

April 03, 2025 at 04:27 pm

I agree. The salaries on CBs are escalating quickly and the two non-guaranteed years left on Alexander's contract are becoming more and more a value. He is healthy going into this season and no draft pick or remaining free agent will match his impact. I would keep Alexander and our CB room will be stocked. Focus on draft where we really are going to need bodies in this year and next - DL, WR, OL.

0 points
0
0
joejetson's picture

April 03, 2025 at 10:04 pm

I agree, they should keep him. Why create a 'need' on your roster? His recent injury history has been a problem, but he should be back fully healthy. Will he get hurt again in 2025? Maybe, but any player can. It's a violent sport.

Unless someone offers a great trade value (which is unlikely) they need him in '25. When healthy, he's a top 10 CB.

It's a good risk to take.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 04, 2025 at 11:03 am

He made an incredible Pick of Hurts in the Endzone, game one, or the Game may have been a blowout...

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 04, 2025 at 01:20 pm

Sorry, Since61, I think the Packers have made the decision at the highest level. They came to the conclusion that he wasn't helping them and were unwilling to gamble another $17M that he would suddenly return to the player he was 5 years earlier.

So, IMO, this is a settled matter at 1265. Nixon and Valentine, who've been our de facto starters for two years, are under contract. They added Hobbs to replace Stokes. They've moved on

You are correct that it APPEARS there is no trade interest, and that cutting him provides no return.....other than it stops pouring $17M/year into a gopher hole.

You're a wealthier guy than I am if you're willing to risk $17M on him. One decent season in four years.....he's 28. I'd take the safe route and release him and not spend any more money on him.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

April 06, 2025 at 09:10 am

I think 61' has it correct.

I think Alexander stays.
Not that the Packers don't want to trade him.
But they aren't getting value back for him via trade, imo.

Alexander was Gutes first pick, and also his best pick.
Other than injury issues, he's still a shutdown corner.
Show me a guy who averages 80 in coverage grade for his career, and i'll show you a blue chip corner.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 03, 2025 at 04:55 pm

Not great Bob.

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

April 03, 2025 at 05:46 pm

I bet the Packers draft who they need when they draft and possible best player available. All the conjecture is truly hilarious.

0 points
0
0