Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Everybody's Talking At Me
The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.
By JerseyAl

The CheeseheadTV draft guide is out. That means my mind can wander to polluted thoughts again, although it will likely take a few days to recapture full "pollutedness." Anyway, here a few things on my mind about what we heard from Brian Gutekunst and Matt LaFleur at the NFL Winter Meetings.
Jenkins moving to center makes a ton of sense and tells you Aaron Banks was a player the Packers had targeted before free agency. Gutey mentioned that he had discussed the move to center with Jenkins beforehand as well. That would indicate to me they were hell bent on signing Aaron Banks (why?) which might have worked in Banks' favor in terms of the generous contract he received.
According to Gutey, the Packers now have two potential All-Pro centers on the offensive line. He had previously said this about Zach Tom and now has repeated it with regards to Elgton Jenkins. Gutey thinks about centers a lot. (In reality, he's just obsessed with VERSATILITY).
I had a good chuckle watching Matt LaFleur's response to the question posed to him about why he thinks the tush push should be banned. After the requisite BS about concern for player safety, it was pointed out that the Packers have used the play. LaFleur squirmed a little in his chair, acknowledging with a slight sheepish smile that they had indeed used it themselves. I think he should have pointed out that they came up with a way to not put the safety of their quarterback in harms way (which to me is the only player safety aspect of this), but instead he babbled on about doing what's within the rules, blah, blah, blah. Personally, I'd just like to go back to when it was not legal to assist any ball carrier by pushing or throwing him forward.
According to LaFleur, the Packers did a deep dive on their WR drops issue and hinted that it wasn't a skill or effort issue, but rather more a "focus" issue. But isn't that really part of effort? If you're giving max effort, aren't you highly focused?
What Matt LaFleur liked about new defensive line coach Demarcus Covington was that "he knows ball" and he's a "technician." Does that mean we should be hopeful that he can teach our defensive ends some effective pass rush techniques?
When asked about the Packers pass rush, Gutey said he believes they have everything they need to improve the pass rush with the players currently on the roster. For awhile now, my gut has told me this is how he feels and I even went public with this polluted thought a week ago.
Call me crazy, but I'm thinking the #Packers feel they have enough in-house talent at EDGE Rusher that just needs to be unlocked and do not draft one. I'm not saying that I think this is the case, just that they do.
— Jersey Al (@jerseyalgbp.bsky.social) March 25, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Gutey says the Packers are still "working through" the Jaire Alexander situation (he likely rehearses this in front of the mirror every morning). Also says there "could be" a possibility he plays for the Packers this year. I think there also "could be" a possibility the Packers sign Aaron Rodgers.
Gutey said Jordan Morgan will "get a shot" at left tackle. LaFleur confirmed in his media chat that there will be a competition for the left tackle job between Walker and Morgan. Personally, I think it's more they are praying for Morgan to win the left tackle job. They are just not going to be able to pay Walker a starting left tackle salary when he becomes a free agent after this season.
NEED YOUR HELP - We have reduced the page redirects on the site but it's not fully resolved. If anyone gets redirected when scrolling through the site, please help us by sending the following information to [email protected]
Your device: Desktop, laptop or mobile
Operating System: Windows, macOS, Linux , IOS, Android
Were you logged in to the site? Y/N
Which Browser were you using? Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari, other
If possible - include a screenshot of the page you were redirected to.
This information will help us get to the root cause of the issue. Thank you!
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
__________________________




Comments (60)
TKWorldWide
April 02, 2025 at 08:25 am
Whooo!
Will Johnson, CB, Michigan, rated 3rd overall on the big board, and GB gets him at #23?
Sign
Me
Up,
Baby!
Coldworld
April 02, 2025 at 08:30 am
I’m not as convinced of the direction the Jaire issue will take as you are. Nor do I read as much in to the comments about Morgan getting a shot at LT this year. He’d better darn well have a shot because he’s at worst tackle 3 and no one is replacing Tom absent injury. As to resigning Walker (and Tom), I don’t see that as being as difficult as you do either.
Where I do agree with you is that am increasingly concerned that they do think their DL pool is good enough. In that I think they are misguided. Rebrovich would have to have been a horrendous coach and retention decision for that to be credible.
Clark may be on the downturn, Slaton has gone, Wyatt has flashed but briefly and is an issue against the run. Gary is a threat, but less than hoped for and the next most potent performer last year may well have been Cox.
Moreover, aside from Moseby, they are all bull rushers bigger/power straight line players with little bend or agility and no elite speed. That’s simply one dimensional and, aside from Gary, last year none were truly effective as rushers. Baffling. I hope the new coach can transform that group, but I fear it’s actually a group that’s got fundamental flaws in its construction that the move to 4:3 had magnified further.
The draft will tell, but either LaFleur needs to be grilled on why Rebrovich was retained last off season and, if so culpable, through the season as well.
Meanwhile, if Gute doesn’t take advantage of a very strong DL class to rejuvenate, upgrade and add diversity of threat then he’d better hope the new coach can work miracles, because I think that will be hard to explain or excuse and we are going to have little depth and significant unjustified cap tied up on players who are likely still the best we have despite everything.
HawkPacker
April 02, 2025 at 08:55 am
CW, I agree and disagree.
I know Van Ness has speed as I saw him at Iowa and also saw him run down a QB his first year. I do not understand why they have him bull rush all the time as he should have developed other moves into his 2nd year. Disappointing from a coaching perspective.
I do agree on getting a defensive Tackle in the first round or at least the 2nd round.
LambeauPlain
April 02, 2025 at 11:32 am
Coaching is the great equalizer.
Rebrovich was given the entire DL and while the talent was good enough to help to synergistically get Hafley's D to #6...it seems like all DL players stood still or regressed in the new pressure attack. Like Barry & his two...maybe 3 failed ST coaches, LaFleur is timid with personnel decisions.
Rebrovich was likely a fav of Matt's. It didn't take Jeff long to see he wasn't the man to coach up front 4 pressures.
fthisJack
April 02, 2025 at 09:05 am
I agree....need more pass rush and I personally am hoping for Derrick Harmon. We need more from the interior DL to push the pocket and flush the QB out of the pocket where Gary will be waiting to clean it up.
bjkdad44
April 02, 2025 at 02:49 pm
🤞🏻🙏🏻🤞🏻
Guam
April 02, 2025 at 09:17 am
Like you CW, I will be surprised if a new DL coach can work miracles with the Packer D-line. If he does, that will be a scathing indictment of Rebrovich and LaFleur for retaining him. I wish the best for Covington and expect improvement but I am not expecting miracles.
I have believed for some time that the Packer's biggest weakness is at DT with Slaton gone, Wooden unimpressive and Clark underperforming his contract. However I also wonder if shifting LVN to tackle and drafting a bendy, fast DE might not be a better solution than drafting a college DT. Part of that will depend on how the draft falls, but I think Gute has options as long the Packers are not married to LVN being a DE.
Boneman
April 03, 2025 at 08:34 am
The lack of pressure from four man rushes was partly by design as they charged the line with run defense first and then the bull rush designed for containment of the QB. Despite the lack of production from the four man rush the Packers still were close to top ten in percent of pressure per pass play. Halfley used exotic pressure packages to achieve this. Our overall defense was much better than it had been previously, and that is the goal. We loved the rush numbers that Clay Mathews put up but many times it was at the expense of containment as he played on some pretty bad defensive teams. I think year 2 in this scheme will show improvement, especially if we upgrade Slayton's position in the D.
packerbackerjim
April 02, 2025 at 08:49 am
I suspect lack of development regarding th DLs cannot all be attributed to lack of talent. They seem to have the requisite intelligence so it is either a scouting deficiency or poor coaching. Here’s hoping Covington succeeds where others have failed.
Coldworld
April 02, 2025 at 01:20 pm
One problem is that they are all largely similar. Power rushers with limited change of direction. If we penetrate we often just go past the play. O Lines can just prepare to be bull rushed consistently by whomever. Even if we move players, a bull rush is likely coming anyway. There is no elite speed in the lighter designated pass rusher vein, no elite agility, no great spin moves or other tricks. I think it’s coaching, but I also think we need to diversify threat types, particularly after switching to a 4:3 base.
HarryHodag
April 02, 2025 at 08:49 am
Before I continue I acknowledge that Jordan Love played through injuries last season and those injuries put him off his game.
That said, Jordan Love has to prove this season that he is among the elite quarterbacks in the league, as he is paid. He will be the engine driving the bus. I still would give Willis a shot at starting. Competition sharpens the senses. I hope Love isn't another player who got paid then retired with his jersey on.
I won't be 'unconvinced' that the Packers have largely sat pat(filling two needs through free agency admittedly) but the losses to Detroit, Minnesota and the Bears still sit in my craw. They were outplayed in each case. The Eagles were that good, but the Packers clearly were beaten by the division rivals. Regaining the division means the Packers will be on the platform to compete for something more. We'll wait until after the draft but I'm not convinced they have improved that much.
One more person who needs to step up is Matt LaFleur. He's dangerously close to the Mike McCarthy 'good enough never is' position.
It's a holding pattern for the next 4-5 months.
HawkPacker
April 02, 2025 at 08:57 am
At a minimum, Willis should play the wildcat. Too many advantages not to do that.
bjkdad44
April 02, 2025 at 04:50 pm
Agree 100%… can’t think of any reason not to use him!
Guam
April 02, 2025 at 09:07 am
There is a serious misconception about Love's cost. Everyone loves to quote the $55MM AAV but that is not reality. Love will cost the Packers $29.7MM in 2025, $36.2MM in 2026 and $42.5MM in 2027. The ballon goes up in 2028 when he is due over $74MM. His price for the next three years is very reasonable and he will never see the $74MM. His contract will be renegotiated before then and that ridiculous number which inflates his entire contract will go away.
Love is not one of the highest paid QBs in the league or even close to it over the next three years.
HarryHodag
April 02, 2025 at 04:19 pm
To imply that the Packers got a bargain on his contract also implies that the contract is unreal. It's real, as of today, and is worth $55 mil a year, among the elite contracts. I could say we'll have humans on Mars in five years, but as of today, that is unreal.
Love's contract is real and he needs this next season to prove he can play as well as the highest paid contracts.
Guam
April 02, 2025 at 05:45 pm
So you think there is no difference between a contract at $55MM a year and a contract for much less annually with a ballon payment at the end that likely will never be paid. Suit yourself......
Thegreatreynoldo
April 03, 2025 at 04:21 am
I would not call that a balloon payment at the end, and he is reasonably likely to see it - indeed, he probably gets more in an extension done that year (2028). No one can describe this contract by just looking at OTC. Their own numbers do not add up. Spotrac, Pro Football Talk, and OTC do not agree on the details.
The contract is for $46M or $47M per year, or about $55M per year in new money. His last season calls for $45M in cash, which does not strike me as a balloon payment.
You are correct in that it is highly likely that something will happen in 2028. He is due $45M cash in 2028 but has a whopping $74M cap number while also having $63M in dead money. Sure, GB can cut Love and get cap savings of $11M or so while absorbing that $63M dead, but Love does not figure to be a washed up, old franchise QB. That plan we've seen with old QB is to take a huge one-year cap hit in terms of dead money and then reload. See Russell Wilson (49M dead), Rodgers and Matt Ryan (40M each) and several more at $35M dead. By 2028 $63M might be steep but roughly the going rate for teams divesting themselves of a franchise QB.
But Love will only be 30. He won't be old. Odds are (and all fans hope) GB will want to extend Love another 5 years. Assuming he did not suffer some horrible injury, I would guess Love will be demanding an extension that pays him more than the $45M balloon payment.
Make no mistake though: there is a window, and it is 2025, 2026 and 2027. Sure, they can extend Love in time for the 2028 season but they will have to sprinkle $63M dead into whatever new money QBs are getting 3 years hence.
Guam
April 03, 2025 at 07:47 am
We can argue about the definition of a balloon payment, but we both agree that the 2028 number in Love's contract is there to initiate discussion on a new contract. And yes, it is entirely likely that Love gets a raise over the $45MM cash in 2028 and beyond although that will be a function of how well he performs over the next three years and how much the cap increases over that period.
However my primary point was the Packers are not paying Love $55MM AAV over the next three years (substantially less actually), thereby creating a path for Love to develop and ascend without paying him top QB dollars immediately as well as a window for the team if he ascends quickly.
You are correct that the Packers will have to find a way to deal with the remaining $29MM of unamortized bonus/option from 2028 and that will increase the cost of the new contract. I question why teams do deals like this because they will have "pay the piper" at some point, but it seems to be the way of the league as you pointed out. Teams do big QB deals and then have a one year "correction" at the end of the QB's playing years where the cap is destroyed. I guess that is how you create a window for a Super Bowl run, but there will also be a guaranteed down period after it.
bjkdad44
April 02, 2025 at 04:51 pm
Excellent comments!
Leatherhead
April 02, 2025 at 09:48 am
''Detroit, Minnesota and the Bears still sit in my craw. They were outplayed in each case'''
A 3 point loss to Detroit on the last play of the game. Two 2 point losses to Minnesota. And a loss to the Bears in a game that didn't matter at all and we rested several starters.
I'm not seeing that as getting 'outplayed'. I'm seeing this as being 3 FGs from a 14-3 record.
LambeauPlain
April 02, 2025 at 11:41 am
I believe those games highlighted the lack of urgency on the team BG referred to. Packers got beat in preparation, play calling, playing not to win, and discounting how rationalizing losing losses a valuable edge.
It is not unlike the attitude LaFleur has for preseason. Starters barely play and they start slooooow. And this season they ended slooooow.
HarryHodag
April 02, 2025 at 04:21 pm
A lawyer was in court one day and the defendant was saying 'if only that bad thing hadn't happened I wouldn't be here today'. The lawyer responded, "if ifs and buts were candy and nuts it would be Christmas everyday".
The Packers lost all those games I mentioned. IF this had happened or THAT was different...etc. They lost. Winning is the ultimate control.
Leatherhead
April 02, 2025 at 04:45 pm
And what was the net effect of those losses? Did they keep us out of the playoffs?
They lost, but it isn't like they weren't competitive, or had a chance to win.
T7Steve
April 02, 2025 at 08:51 am
All smoke and mirrors. Of course they're going to say they don't need D-line.
Next year's O-line (26 season) left to right. Morgan, Banks, Tom, Ryan, Walker. That's unless they reconfigure/extend Jenkins's contract this season.
GregC
April 02, 2025 at 09:03 am
It would be a waste of talent to put Zach Tom at center, no matter how well he can play the position. He is needed as an edge protector and will either be paid accordingly by the Packers or he will play somewhere else in 2026.
T7Steve
April 02, 2025 at 09:10 am
Yeah, I know. I just want to keep them all. Best case is a Jenkins rework.
GregC
April 02, 2025 at 08:57 am
I'm glad to hear they are going to give Jordan Morgan a shot at the left tackle job. Of course they said that last year and then immediately put him at guard, but they're not going to lie two years in a row, are they?
I don't expect Morgan to win the left tackle job this year. He just needs to be good enough to be the backup and then start next year if they don't re-sign Rasheed Walker.
Guam
April 02, 2025 at 09:26 am
I'd prefer Morgan to win the RG job this year and get playing time in the NFL. Then he can shift to LT in 2026 if they can't afford to resign Walker.
Leatherhead
April 02, 2025 at 09:57 am
He only stayed healthy for 5 games, so where he was supposed to line up is kind of a moot point.
I think he was drafted to replace Walker, who will leave after this year in FA.
I don't want to see him starting at RG. Rhyan was a Day 2 pick who's been with the team for 3 years, and if he's not good enough to start by now then this was a wasted pick.
Coldworld
April 02, 2025 at 10:31 am
I do not doubt that he was drafted in part to give us leverage and an option to move on from Walker, however, I think he was drafted to start somewhere, as Gute essentially had said at draft time and since. LT is just one possibility.
In the meantime, Walker is proving to be a better player than prudence would have predicted. If his run blocking improves, he’s going to be a near elite T, and no sane team lets those go for comp picks in a year’s time without a fight. He and Tom are young enough that we can spread the cap as we have with Love.
Morgan would have to show very well to match him in the pass game currently and remains is a big question mark at this level at T. My guess is that we try to extend Walker and that Morgan most likely starts at RG and is our next tackle up while Rhyan backs up at G and possibly C.
Rhyan is out of contract too after this year and Morgan beat him out last year. If Rhyan improves significantly to merit a second contract and win the starting role at RG, then perhaps things change, but that may just as likely affect Jenkins not Walker. The team has options, which is good. I think there are more viable than many seem to think.
Bitternotsour
April 02, 2025 at 11:25 am
my reading mostly. i think Morgan is odds on favorite at tackle this year, but I think it could just as easily be Walker particularly if he gets signed early. Allowing him to leave for a 3rd round comp is malpractice. He's a starting left tackle in the NFL. Jenkins is the expendable in all these scenarios. He's older, overpaid for a center/guard, and has struggled with injuries.
gsd3
April 03, 2025 at 05:42 am
Tom is going to reset the market for RT. Whether it's in GB or elsewhere. No way will he accept center money. Why would they pay him tackle dollars and move him to center?
RCPackerFan
April 02, 2025 at 09:25 am
"Jenkins moving to center makes a ton of sense and tells you Aaron Banks was a player the Packers had targeted before free agency. Gutey mentioned that he had discussed the move to center with Jenkins beforehand as well. That would indicate to me they were hell bent on signing Aaron Banks (why?) which might have worked in Banks' favor in terms of the generous contract he received."
I really like signing Banks. I believe Jenkins will be really good at C. To me this is an upgrade on the OL. Banks should be a good upgrade over Myers. Myers was probably the weakest link on the OL. Upgrading that should really help.
"I had a good chuckle watching Matt LaFleur's response to the question posed to him about why he thinks the tush push should be banned. After the requisite BS about concern for player safety, it was pointed out that the Packers have used the play."
I could have a bad memory but I don't remember the Packers running the "tush push". They ran Kraft on sneaks, but I don't remember having the RB's lining up 3 yards behind the ball and pushing the QB in the back at the snap. I could be wrong I just don't remember that part happening.
I just know something needs to change because they can't be having what happened with Washington anymore.
"When asked about the Packers pass rush, Gutey said he believes they have everything they need to improve the pass rush with the players currently on the roster. For awhile now, my gut has told me this is how he feels and I even went public with this polluted thought a week ago."
I do believe they have the pieces. The one type that I would love to see them add to the room though is someone with more speed around the corner. I really feel like they are lacking that. Someone that could be a change of pace off the edge. Someone that can bend the corner and apply instant pressure. If they could add a player like that to the room. i'd be happy. But I believe year 2 in the system will be the most beneficial.
"NEED YOUR HELP - We have reduced the page redirects on the site but it's not fully resolved. If anyone gets redirected when scrolling through the site, "
Well this is the 3rd time I have spent trying to type something because I have been redirected twice now. I didn't pay attention to what I got redirected to. I will email explaining what happened to me.
LeotisHarris
April 02, 2025 at 09:49 am
The draft guide is beautiful, Al, and the perfect thing to take the edge off this wet, blustery day in my corner of Wisconsin. Great story by Ken to leadoff.
Thanks for all the work you and the team put into the guide. Well done!
Leatherhead
April 02, 2025 at 09:53 am
Don't complain about wet and blustery.
I was laughing at people in my old hometown about the snowstorm they got, telling them that my lawn was green, my plants were blooming, and it was in the 80s. Then.....God sent the second biggest hailstorm I've ever seen in the afternoon. Car dented all over, roof will need to be replaced, and a bunch of my landscaping was destroyed. Mud EVERYWHERE.
LeotisHarris
April 02, 2025 at 10:21 am
While I am sorry for your woe, of all my online friends, you are the one I feel is most deserving of an Old Testament-like smiting. Repent, LH, before it's too late.
I share my home with 240 pounds of Great Pyrenees. Wet and blustery means wet double coats. While they are the bestest boy and goodest girl, when their coats are soaked I am faced with challenges I'd rather avoid. Give me -30 temps any day.
Bitternotsour
April 02, 2025 at 11:27 am
nothing like the ongoing smell of a wet dog settling in to a warm house.
LLCHESTY
April 02, 2025 at 07:05 pm
I've got a friend that trains sheep dogs and has a couple Pyrenees protecting his sheep. One time I was at his house to grill out and simmered some brats in beer I took the whole pot outside to put the brats on the grill and was going to let the liquid cool down before getting rid of it. When I came back out with some more meat a few minutes later the male Pyrenees had consumed the whole pot. He was a happy boy that night.
Interesting thing about those dogs, they have a real blood lust for coyotes and protecting the flock but as soon as a sheep dies it's dinner. I picture them sitting by the sheep waiting for the light to go out while licking their lips.
Guam
April 02, 2025 at 05:50 pm
I lived in Houston for a few years and Texas has the worst hailstorms I have ever seen. Sorry you got nailed by one. They can cause lots of damage.
JerseyAl
April 03, 2025 at 08:33 am
Thank you for the kind words!
Leatherhead
April 02, 2025 at 09:50 am
I heard Gute's comments about the Dline and the pass rush. I agree. I think the people we have under contract ....Gary, VanNess, Enagbare, Brooks/Cox....do a fine job, and there's no reason to draft a guy just so we can cut one of them.
We need a guy to replace Slaton on first down. That's what we need. Everything else on defense is a Want, not a Need.
bjkdad44
April 02, 2025 at 05:11 pm
I am bewildered… why 4 downvotes… please explain….
Oppy
April 03, 2025 at 04:25 am
Perhaps because Leatherhead has a history of defending every single Packers player as being a great starting-caliber talent with the underlying logic being that they are starters so therefore they are clearly great at their job and there's no reason to look at replacement because if they weren't good enough to start then they wouldn't be starters.
The downside of this logic is, of course, that once you have become a starter, it is impossible to be replaced, because if you're starting, that means you're a starter, and since you would not be starting if you weren't a starter, and given the fact that starters are good at their job, why would you ever need to replace the starter? He is, after all, a starting caliber starter; and everyone knows starters are starting because they're great- so why on earth you would go and replace a starter? I mean, if you grab another player to start, then you'll ultimately be faced with having to fire a player who is currently a starter in order to start that other player, and why on god's green earth would you ever want to fire a starter? It's unthinkable! The starter you intend to fire IS a starter, after all. And everyone knows, if you're a starting player, you're clearly performing at a starting level, otherwise.. why would you be a starter?
Well, now that I actually took the time to write it all out, it makes perfect sense.
LLCHESTY
April 02, 2025 at 07:16 pm
Ever heard of a smokescreen? They were average, buoyed up by sacks from a half a dozen players not on the front four and Hafley's sim pressures and 3rd down blitzing. At the very least they need a pass rush specialist to add some speed in passing situations but more improvement could probably come from a Slaton replacement.
stockholder
April 02, 2025 at 11:05 am
Working through a mess.?
Doubt it’s at CB.
Replacing A All-pro 2020 & 2022 Guard.
(Expecting him to move back to center.)
Where he must hike with accuracy.
Avoid getting stood up when firing off the ball.
And still help the guy at Rg, who should be replaced.
No respect for Walker- He’s not coming off a injury.
Signing a LG who must play LG.
And letting the RG problem fix itself.
Can’t wait for the headlines!
So a dL coach is going to teach.
You can’t teach a Bust!
And lets just get those WRs to focus-
Fixing stupid, only requires a new WR @#23
jannesbjornson
April 02, 2025 at 12:09 pm
It could be a career saver for Jenkins. He was not playing at an All-Pro level, post knee surgery. The fast step to help Myers was slowing down. The Jaire mess? His First Pick....
LLCHESTY
April 02, 2025 at 07:10 pm
Gentlemen, I think it might be time for an intervention. I think Stock has put the frogs down and moved on to Malabar Giant Squirrels!
"But officer you don't understand, the squirrel was this big!"
*Look it up, you'll understand.
Dragon5
April 02, 2025 at 11:22 am
Role of GM = Houdini = mislead, redirect
Shemar Stewart...Boom or bust....you tell me? Can say I've yet to see a player shed a block and thrust 90 degrees to the sideline more quickly than he; however, EDGE requires sacks and without production you're betting on potential. Potential without production hasn't fared too well for Mr. Gutenkunst, has it? There are plenty of 9+ RAS projects in later rounds. Despite being undersized, James Pearce Jr certainly looks productive on tape.
Lamar Jackson born 01-07-1997 7 life path 🐀 born on 7 day
Cam Ward born 05-25-2002 7 life path 🐎 born on 7 day
will Cam be great like LJAX? maybe...oft injured: -->LIKELY<--
Have seen a poster or two (finally) bring up Willis to PIT. PIT or not, Gute did well with a low-risk acquisition building value, but his job remains unfinished. He now either plays insurance broker for another year or turns this asset into draft capital. Would Malik Willis to PIT, swap 1sts, PIT 3rd, PIT 4th (2026) be unrealistic? #TANKFORARCH will soon be underway.
Aaron Rodgers is probably best suited to sit & wait for a closing opportunity being born in a 🐷 year, enemy sign of current 🐍 year. I have little doubt he's fully aware of his predicament. Mahomes, Mayfield, and Watson also 🐷 year born QBs, so cross KC & TB off as Lombardi recipients this year.
I see Grey Zabel picking up steam as our potential #1, especially if we trade down a few spots. Few things (other than RAS perhaps), get our GM excited more than OL versatility😃
CB Darien Porter....aged, raw, currently subpar tackler, BUT special teams ace...could he be....Sam Shields 2.0?
Enemy year 🐍 for 🐷s: Kenny Clark, Elgin Jenkins
Also increased injury risk: Devonte Wyatt
draft accordingly
Bitternotsour
April 02, 2025 at 11:31 am
by god you should open a consultancy
LambeauPlain
April 02, 2025 at 11:50 am
With Morgan slated to compete with Walker it likely tips off Gutey targeting an IOL before a T, unless the available tackle in the "round" OL is drafted is easily better.
Looking forward to the Draft Guide!
LLCHESTY
April 02, 2025 at 07:18 pm
More likely they'll draft a T and move them to G. It's an outdated drafting model but what they do.
Coldworld
April 03, 2025 at 08:43 am
Unless we are seeing a change in the Jacobs era with the signing of Banks? It’s possible our OL approach is adjusting to some extent at least.
Bitternotsour
April 03, 2025 at 09:07 am
embracing the shanahan. control on the lines, control on the clock. don't be surprised to see a 55/45 split run to pass and less possessions for the opposition.
Bitternotsour
April 02, 2025 at 11:52 am
Some may recall that AR's head was turned to mush quarterback sneaking. That the Packers wish to end the practice of the QB being used as a battering ram can't be dismissed as sour grapes. It's a legit health hazard for a league that claims to care about player health and whose former players suffer miserably from CTE.
also, sorry Tucker Kraft, your brain isn't as valuable as Jordan Love's.
rememberWhitehurst
April 02, 2025 at 01:59 pm
The Packers appear to have parted ways with their DL coach due to lack of development there, but did not do the same with the receivers coach when that group also regressed. I’d love if one of the beat reporters would ask why. I’m not arguing that Ryan Mahaffey should have been fired, but I am curious about the different approach between position groups. When Jason Vrable lost the receivers coach title, the group got worse. Correlation or causation? I don’t know.
NFLfan
April 02, 2025 at 02:15 pm
You can't ask intelligent questions such as that on this site.
JerseyAl
April 02, 2025 at 02:19 pm
why not?
bjkdad44
April 02, 2025 at 05:21 pm
Wish I knew too ‼️‼️
Alberta_Packer
April 02, 2025 at 07:25 pm
At this point in the off-season - I'm not very interested in "he said he said." Rather, I am mostly interested in the potential bounties from the Draft to the GBP. So the CHTV Draft Guide will certainly be a voluntary study for me. In the meantime - I'm also keeping watch on all the pre-draft visits - as approximately 25% of visits– from the last 3 years - whether that be as a draft pick or signing as an undrafted rookie - ended up on the Packers roster.
Matt
April 03, 2025 at 04:32 pm
The most important thing is that we shouldn't take all they say for granted. On the other hand we also shouldn't overthink it. Some things they say as they are the others are only a play, smokescreen. I think we all try to analyze it too much because we have too much free time (this part of it devoted for football) as there are no games. We should go for a walk more often, relax in the garden and wait for the draft to come and reveal something. Myself included.
We all know we need: DT, DE, LB, CB, WR, OL. Who knows right now what are the priorities? Maybe it is true that our internal talent on DE will blossom this year? Coaches and management know 100 times more than we know and they'd plan the draft to help Green Bay best. The fact is no matter how it rolls out, max 3 positions (as for now) could be addressed on what is considered premium 3 rounds of draft with known surnames. So most of us having any kind of personal strategy will be disappointed. In my opinion this year should be DT in 1st - because of 1. talent of the class 2. our contract situatioin 3. pass rush help. There are few great prospects and one of them could fall to #23 and in 2026 (if not now) we'd need someone in place for Wyatt or Clark. I wonder if I will be disappointed too :)