Cory's Corner: Embrace The Boring
Don't expect shock and awe just because the draft is in Green Bay.

The NFL Draft is about a month away, but this time the annual three-day NFL party is in Green Bay.
Does that mean that Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst is under more pressure to produce?
I don’t think Gutekunst should feel like he has to hit a home run just because he will be within a nine-iron of cheese curds the moment he steps on the draft stage.
This is a pivotal draft. The Packers have their quarterback, they have a No. 1 running back, a budding tight end in Tucker Kraft and a lot of options at wide receiver. This team is two to three players away from getting to the NFC title game. Granted, that won’t be easy because the Eagles, Lions and Rams should be the top three teams on paper in the NFC.
There’s no reason to reach for a prospect at No. 23 just to grab a headline and “Win the draft.” If University of Texas left tackle Kelvin Banks Jr. is still available at 23, then it would be obvious. This is Rasheed Wallace’s last year under contract and the Packers can always use reinforcements to protect their $55 million investment.
But if there isn’t anybody on the offensive or defensive line, Gutekunst needs to do the smart thing and just trade back for more picks. I get it, that will be about as exciting as clapping with one hand but it’s the right move.
There are a lot of people that get frustrated when they hear the word Gutekunst. They think that he has done a terrible assembling the roster. But frankly, he’s done a very good job. And the reason why I like it is because he isn't afraid to take chances. He brought in Preston Smith, Za’Darius Smith, Adrian Amos and Josh Jacobs. Those players have had big roles and it’s also a direct contrast to how former general manager Ted Thompson built rosters.
The NFC North hasn’t been this competitive in a long time and the Packers have remained consistent throughout. I agree that it is concerning that the Packers went 4-3 against 2023 playoff teams. And that counts a flimsy Dolphins team that looked like it wanted no part of that chilly Thanksgiving night game.
The Packers are closer than a lot of people think. The reason why the Eagles claimed the Super Bowl this past February was because they owned the line of scrimmage. You can talk about getting a No. 1 wideout until next week but the Packers just have to get better at the line of scrimmage.
So if you’re going to the draft, don’t be disappointed by boring. Embrace it. Just as the Packers didn’t get attracted to the shiny object in free agency, they likely will not do something just for a splash. Leave that for the Giants, which is why they are perpetually drafting high in the draft.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn
__________________________




Comments (64)
TKWorldWide
March 29, 2025 at 07:02 am
I don’t think Gute has done a terrible assembling the roster. I think he has done a solid assembling the roster.
I don’t think the trenches boring.
I don’t think Philly made trendy.
I think football has always been about the.
murf7777
March 29, 2025 at 09:03 am
TK, right on! #buildthetrenches
Turophile
March 29, 2025 at 07:14 am
Shock and Awe is EXACTLY what I expect from this draft.
I don't believe I think like you think people think (heh). I'd love a defensive tackle in round one as much or more than I'd like an Edge, CB or WR.
I believe there is terrific value through round two, so the Shock and Awe (for me) comes with a trade down, ideally for an extra 2nd and 3rd round pick. That is going to be very difficult to achieve in this particular draft as it is a trade-down type of draft, so finding a team that wants to trade up is going to be very difficult (maybe impossible). I'm hoping for a deal with the Giants or Jaguars, but we will see if Gute can generate any interest there.
Failing a trade down, I'm hoping either that Gute keeps Alexander on the roster for this year and does not address CB in the first three rounds, going DT, Edge, WR............or that he believes the Packers are ok with Gary, Van Ness, Cox and Enagbare, under a new Defensive Line coach (going DT, CB, WR in some order, with the first three picks).
@ TKWorldwide Your comment reminds me of a London band, formed back in 1979, who called themselves The The.
TKWorldWide
March 29, 2025 at 07:29 am
Good thoughts, Turo! (I’m poking the bear bc of the missing word in the article.)
I am almost at the point where I say “just get us some good players that can contribute” rather than locking in hoping for positions of need.
For example, when TT took Jordy Nelson my reaction was “A receiver? WTF?” How wrong I was. (Of course, with the passage of time, I can’t remember what GB’s needs were then.)
However, if GB can add good players AT positions of need, that’s the ultimate.
For example, adding an off-ball LB early is not a popular notion, BUT what if he’s the next Fred Warner/Ray Lewis/Mike Singletary/Jack Lambert? Maybe then the choice becomes more palatable. But GB would still need to add to their pass rush, db, and receiver rooms. I get it!
Since'75
March 29, 2025 at 08:06 am
TK does get it. Good post.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 08:35 am
As I read more and more, I find that we as fans have very weird views on player procurement...and it almost always is focused on immediate gratification rather than 2-3 year roster and cap management plans.
"I am almost at the point where I say “just get us some good players that can contribute” rather than locking in hoping for positions of need."
I think they've done a pretty good job of that over the last couple drafts--17 of 22 projected starters are Packers draftees. That's at the top of the league. and the majority of those guys are on rookie deals, yet.
Since'75
March 29, 2025 at 12:46 pm
Good draft and develop teams, like the Packers in past years, don't draft for need, because they don't feel they need to.
Drafting for need, goes against the D and D formula.
They usually have good depth and a solid roster.
They go after what they feel, might become a future impact player, or solid starter.
That is why...the Packers in the past would pick the BPA, because they had solid rosters and they developed, back then.
What i've seen, is some lip service, about taking the BPA available in recent years.
But ironically (coincidence?) it also happened to be positions of need.
So, it is what it is.
************
I don't give a flying ... about BPA, or D and D right now.
For all you Rodgers haters, the stench is gone.
We can't blame him......anymore.
We can't cry because he makes too much money, or he didn't get his covid shot, or he lied to me <sniffle>
Right now...What i'm looking for, citing the fact we have the 2nd highest paid QB, a rb who can move the needle, a handful of mid level pass catchers, and an improving defense under Hafley, with a scoring defense under 20 PPG.
We have all that, with a 6th place ranked defense, and a good dependable place kicker.
Lets win something!!
Maybe!!....In Gutes 8th season, it's time to.....win something, something?
That's my only goal with this team right now.
The table is set
IT'S TIME.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 01:16 pm
"What i'm looking for, citing the fact we have the 2nd highest paid QB"
In AAV, yes. But it's the fact that his cap hit year-to-year for the next 3 seasons keeps him firmly in the middle (12th-15th) of QB salaries that the Packers had some space to sign a few guys the last couple off-seasons. Love will never sniff that huge cap hit that bloats his AAV in 2028.
Since'75
March 29, 2025 at 07:50 pm
Well (sigh) he got a 220 million dollar deal for four years, how that spreads out for the salary cap, is of no consequence to me.
He's 26 years old and he hasn't won anything in this league yet.
Big picture, he's done pretty well sans the bonehead picks, so far, he's getting paid on potential.
But....He banked 79 million dollars just in 2024 alone. He got 160 mill/guaranteed.
Not bad for someone who hasn't won anything in the NFL...yet.
Maybe his time will come, as Packer fans we hope so.
But i'd like to see him (team) win something.
***********
In related........these salaries are just getting crazy. receivers are at or approaching 30 million/year.
The way this is going, in about 10 +/- years, QB's are going to be kissing 100 million/year.
******
Favre, in his 16 seasons with the Packers, made 98 million.
Love with 2 starting seasons under his belt, has banked 98.8 million.
WOW
murf7777
March 29, 2025 at 09:20 am
TK, I have to wonder when Jordy was drafted and you stated WTF……how long did that feeling last? Keeping in mind, it wasn’t till the end of year 3 before he really produced and many were calling him a bust. That was common practice for TT to go with BPA.
Regarding Gutey taking the BPA or need. . I think Gutey more often than not goes with need over BPA. I wouldn’t say that about TT who seemed to take BPA over need. When Gutey perceives a need he double or triple dips in the draft and free agency.
TKWorldWide
March 29, 2025 at 10:42 am
Yeah, it definitely took a good while before that feeling passed.
Another time it was HaHa Clinton-Dix. They NEEDED a safety and I had read about him being highly rated. Plus, Bama. Anyway, early on he seemed to be the goods but eventually…so that was really the exact opposite of the Jordy thing.
Man, my hindsight is awesome!
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 01:19 pm
HHCD was like that first humid 85 degree day after a long stretch in the mid-90s. Compared to what you were living with, it feels awfully good...but that doesn't mean it's actually good.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 08:29 am
"I don't believe I think like you think people think (heh). "
Inigo Montoya: I don't think that means what you think it means.
TKWorldWide
March 29, 2025 at 10:38 am
High
Lair!!
murf7777
March 29, 2025 at 09:10 am
Turo…..not calling you out, but I don’t remember a draft where fans on this site or in general haven’t wanted the Packers to trade down and get more picks. It’s like a kid in the candy store….the more the merrier:)
For me, I trust the process because that’s all I can do. I have no power over what Gutey will do. I think especially when drafting in the later half of the 1st round, unless there is a player you are in LOVE with, trading down makes sense.
Turophile
March 30, 2025 at 05:54 am
Your not not wrong about trading down. If there is one almost constant theme for me, its that I always find excellent value somewhere in round 2. Sometimes my favourites are likely to be gone before we pick (in Rd 2) and sometimes they will be there, but I always like the value.
Once you get past the top 5-15 players (depending on which draft year we are talking about) the next 30 or more players are not hugely different in ability.
Because Green Bay (like virtually all teams) always seems to have more starter-level needs than high draft spots to fill them, I'm virtually always a trade-down advocate for one or more extra day 2 picks.
LambeauPlain
March 29, 2025 at 07:41 am
If Gutey's first decision on Day 1 of the draft at Lambeau field is to trade down, he won't be very popular.
Yet if the first round unfolds with the top 2 to 4 players on the Packers' Board gone, but more than a few top prospects looking like they will clump in second, get another second round pick.
That 5th year option is valuable, but less so if their day 1 Board depletes and their day 2 board strengthens.
Additional picks for potential starting roles or quality depth will help "win now"...also help address the sideward glance at the 2026 off season.
Starters Watson & Doubs, Wyatt & Q. Walker, Tom & R. Walker & Rhyan are up. So are Enagbare & Cox, Jr & Heath & Willis. That's 11 starters and key depth players to be re-signed or replaced.
GBD79boog
March 29, 2025 at 08:05 am
I agree with pretty much everything you wrote and would be disappointed if they don't pick on opening night, but if it's the best route forward then I would support it. Although in this scenario, my hope would be going down but remaining in the first round while still getting an extra pick. wishful thinking.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 08:07 am
Cox and Heath are both RFAs after 2025, so the Packers are in the driver's seat with those two, and they won't likely cost much.
GBD79boog
March 29, 2025 at 07:51 am
You hit the nail on the head with the proverbial hammer. Despite the defense's vast improvement last year, the Packers need to get even better, and that means upfront. They need an impact pass rusher and/or interior guy who can wreak havoc. And if fans didn't see how important depth on the OL was after watching Glover and Telfort against Philly, then they weren't watching the game.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 08:04 am
It's hard to see a 1st round TE, S, RB or QB, but just about any other position in the first round is a possibility.
Guam
March 29, 2025 at 08:34 am
And this is why I don't see Gute trading out of round one. He has several directions he could reasonably go in round one and I think it unlikely that all of the players he would like to choose from will be gone. Whether it is DL, WR, OL or CB, I think the Packers will make a first round pick.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 08:41 am
I tend to agree--there's likely to be someone the Packers have a high grade on at that pick who also fits into roster management plans at that spot. I think the hard part is making that decision to pull the trigger or judging whether they can project more fruitful options later on.
I have no doubt that BG (and probably all GMs) has a whole lot of different possible pathways mapped out through the draft...like a choose your own adventure book, each path (and priorities) is reset by each pick.
Guam
March 29, 2025 at 10:09 am
As always, it depends on how the board falls......
TKWorldWide
March 29, 2025 at 03:24 pm
Unless it’s nailed up very securely
Coldworld
March 29, 2025 at 09:32 am
It depends on how their board looks after 22 picks. If they see several options of approximately the same value then a trade back for a pick is essentially a zero cost gain: a move down to the 33rd pick is worth about pick 82 in mid round 3 for 3 if that scenario holds.
If, on the other hand, they think doing so removes the chance to improve the team optimally by missing, then they send in their pick. Since we don’t know the board we can never guess the outcome. Both can be the win and the advisability of each can’t be known till we are almost on the clock.
stockholder
March 29, 2025 at 08:05 am
I don’t believe Gute believes in the process.
He has deceived - For his own personal gain.
And he Treats every setback as a step closer to success.
Gute knows the priorities, and won't stick to them.
He gradually reduced the strength of the draft.
So I find it Totally unbelievable. -
That you can talk about the Line of scrimmage.
Because he had his chances to do that since being named GM!
He created the revolving door at RT.
It took him years to get Clarke help.
And he's put it on the "coach" when the Defenses failed.
If not the QB.
The revolving door in the secondary is proof.
You don't need to trade down
when you use Free Agency as effective as he has.
It's what TT didn't do.
Wolf started the process. Gute has killed it.
He gradually reduced the strength of the
Draft Ammo. Giving up the conscious BPA.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 08:26 am
Sorry, man, but WTAF.
stockholder
March 29, 2025 at 09:14 am
Take off your rose colored glasses.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 09:16 am
They're green and gold. ;)
stockholder
March 29, 2025 at 09:32 am
Then you should be against
what Cory is feeding us.
Any old Gb fan would remember
what we gave up for John Jefferson.
At that time he fit the offense.
But the cost were too high.
The costs of Gute's moves are
what I'm referring to.
Cap hell or the process.
Even with his free Agents.
It will never be enough.
The fit they saw in John Jefferson
Shouldn't be the reason for leaving the
all-pro for someone else.
jannesbjornson
March 29, 2025 at 12:14 pm
He's a reactor, not a proactive guy. Then you get into recovery mode with the over-drafting/over-spending.
Study Veach.
LLCHESTY
March 29, 2025 at 09:41 pm
The cost were too high hunh?🤣🤣🤣
You so funny!
LLCHESTY
March 29, 2025 at 09:42 pm
"He has deceived - For his own personal gain."
??? Do you have examples of this?
Oppy
March 29, 2025 at 08:11 am
The last week or so, CHTV has been triggering my antivirus and knocking me out of the webpage. This has been happening every few minutes I'm logged in, seems to be tied to a pop-up advertiser attempting to re-direct my browser to another page, the domain of which my antivirus deems classified as a "Malvertising" site. Of course, it always seems to happen while I'm typing a post. (but not limited to just while entering a post.)
Anyone else having this issue lately? Win11 PC, Firefox browser.
Guam
March 29, 2025 at 08:28 am
Having exactly the same issue Oppy. More than a bit frustrating.
Oppy
March 29, 2025 at 08:59 am
I'm going to remember to screenshot the URL reported in the antivirus msg.. I'm curious if it will match whatever has been plaguing you as well, or if it is consistently the same URL.
NFLfan
March 29, 2025 at 09:07 am
Chrome?
Bitternotsour
March 29, 2025 at 09:37 am
edge for me
Bitternotsour
March 29, 2025 at 09:36 am
same here. the dreaded red screen, multiple times.
PackEyedOptimist
March 29, 2025 at 09:59 am
Yep.
I’ve had my comments disrupted so many times that I now copy the text just so I don’t have to retype it.
Oppy
March 29, 2025 at 10:25 am
If I have a lot to say (as you know, I often do.. apologies lol) I am starting to type it out in a notepad document first, then copy it, and then paste it into a post as quickly as I can and hit submit.
I've written probably a dozen replies or fresh comments in the last week that have been lost via this interruption that I've simply decided weren't worth retyping and I've just abandoned them.
Actually, this is could probably be considered a feature as opposed to a bug by many of the group here who dislike my takes, lol.
Oppy
March 29, 2025 at 10:33 am
"prevented connect to f0yhaqr9okdj.xyz because it is a dangerous webpage. Threat category: URL:Malvertising" is the alert I get from my antivirus after it cuts connection to CHTV's page.
Spock
March 29, 2025 at 11:44 am
Exactly the same problem, Oppy, except that I'M NOT EVEN TYPING when the page shifts to the malware site. I haven't clicked on anything. The only thing I'm doing is scrolling down the column and POW I'm suddenly directed to a malicious site w/ an antivirus warning!
Oppy
March 29, 2025 at 11:57 am
I never make it to the page, my AV shuts it down immediately.
LLCHESTY
March 29, 2025 at 09:45 pm
Switch CHTV to Brave. I've never had a problem once I did.
PackAttackJack
March 30, 2025 at 01:49 pm
Same here!!
NFLfan
March 29, 2025 at 09:04 am
Boring is fine if one chooses well but there are too many misses. Jordan Morgan is an unknown entity in an important role. Ty'Ronn Hopper has not shown-up @ all and was a questionable choice, IMO-- he was needed last season. Marshawn Lloyd is an unknown as well--hip, hamstring, appendectomy. The appy is less concerning but he was unplayable all season until the appy ruled him completely out.
murf7777
March 29, 2025 at 09:30 am
And yet they just keep winning…..guess what, most other teams are missing more…the draft is a crap shoot where only about 50% of 1st rounds get a second contract and that percentage gets worse as the rounds progress. Also, take into consideration that they normally pick in the later third of every round. The only fair way to access how good your GM drafts is by comparison to the whole league. I’d look at winning percentage and how many plays their draft picks play. Just making comments about a GM missing on a player(s), or stating he should’ve taken XYZ player is just showing he’s human and drafting isn’t an exact science. It’s more like rolling the dice on the craps table.
I’d say Gutey has done quite well by comparison.
Guam
March 29, 2025 at 10:07 am
Cookie for murf!!!!
Coldworld
March 29, 2025 at 09:38 am
Your expectations are unrealistic if you expect all draft picks to contribute heavily in year one. Your assessments of players must be interesting if you write them off or in after one year. It’s simply not how things work.
Racingdad
March 29, 2025 at 09:14 am
I did a mock this morning that most likely never happens but here goes traded back twice at 31 DT k grant at 54 OT j Connelly at71 cb az Thomas. At 86 wr tia Felton pk 87 wr Donte thorton pk 124 edge Tyler Barron pk 198 te Jaylon conyers. Pk 237 center Jacob bayer pk 250 cb Corey thorton This draft would be a home run filling every need and building for the future What do you guys think. Of this ?
Since'75
March 29, 2025 at 11:11 am
Wowzer....
"most likely never happens = never happens.
Mock drafts are the epitome of the silly season. Silly
.02
But, to each their own entertainment, have at it.
I wait to see who the Packers picks are, then i check them out and do some research, mostly on draft scouting opinions to have somewhat of a baseline of those players.
More often than not, the scouts are pretty accurate once you read their viewpoints, and then compare a players performance after the player has been in the NFL a season or two.
Since'75
March 29, 2025 at 11:03 am
Ok First, about the draft being in Green Bay.
It's fantastic!!
I don't often give Murphy a lot of credit. I think he's mismanaged a lot of situations. But i'll skip the labor pains of describing those, as knowledgeable fans already know what i'm talking about.
But credit to Murphy for getting the draft, i think he has contacts at the NFL that made that possible.
So Kudos, that was a good get.
With that said, i think this years draft lacks 'sizzle', to me anyway.
There doesn't seem to be any 'can't miss' we can't stop talking about him, draft picks.
The drama i guess, is about, what slot does Sanders go in, and then, who may trade up or down early.
The latter, which is the same every year.
As far as the Packers draft class, i don't care if they trade up, down, or sideways.
Just find some talent, or maybe....an impact player.
Some may have read my recent comment about the Packers drafts of 2018-2021.
It's time we hit on some draft picks, that stick around for a 2nd contract.
LeotisHarris
March 29, 2025 at 11:30 am
"There are a lot of people that get frustrated when they hear the word Gutekunst. "
Gutekunst! Slowly I turned, step by step...
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 12:46 pm
Gutekunst!
<<lightning crashes>>
<<horses whinny>>
cdoemel
March 29, 2025 at 12:17 pm
What’s the thinking on, if they use the 23rd pick, don’t trade back for whatever reason, how far below the 23rd pick projection do you go? If you’re on the clock at 23 and the guy you want is projected at 30 and there’s no trading partners do you just take him?
GregC
March 29, 2025 at 02:26 pm
Is Jordan Morgan already such a lost cause at OT that they need to draft his replacement in the first round just one year later? I sure hope not, especially when they already have two established starters at tackle.
I like Cory's euphemism that the Packers have "a lot of options at wide receiver." Nevermind that none of the options are particularly good. Apparently we need multiple first round draft pick O-linemen riding the bench.
gsd3
March 29, 2025 at 03:27 pm
What if they cannot get a contract worked out with Tom? What if he wants to hit the open market? There isn't even a proven swing tackle on the roster. We don't have enough info on Morgan yet to even know if he could reliably fill one spot. Couple that with Rhyan hitting free agency as well, possible poop storm on the horizon.
dobber
March 29, 2025 at 03:29 pm
Fully anticipate that there will be two open spots on the OL after 2025. They drafted 3 OL last year...I expect they'll draft more than one this year...and I suspect they'll do it next year, too.
GregC
March 29, 2025 at 03:58 pm
I'm not disputing that they need to draft O-linemen. I just don't think they should spend another first round pick on one. There are other positions where they need an impact player.
gsd3
March 31, 2025 at 05:56 am
Hoping Wyatt Milum is one of them.
Bear
March 29, 2025 at 03:58 pm
20 years counted.
According to Pro Football Reference, most drafted players are busts. the only problem with their system is they don’t take into account the round they where picked. But anyway…
16.7% don’t even end playing for the drafting team (20 years average) 37% are considered ‘useless’, or busts. 5.3% are ‘poor’. Busts such as Jamarcus Russell are here.
So 69% are ‘poor’ or worst.
10.5% average
12.3% good 6.8% great 1% legendary
That gives 20.1% good. 2 out of 10.
Bitternotsour
March 29, 2025 at 04:05 pm
so you're saying there's a chance...