The Packers Need Carrington Valentine to Step Up In Jaire Alexander's Absence

The Green Bay Packers got bad news earlier this week when they found out that their top cornerback, Jaire Alexander, will miss more time due to an injured PCL. There presently is no timetable for Alexander’s return to the lineup. So, the Packers will turn to second-year man Carrington Valentine to help fill the void left by Alexander’s absence.

Valentine surprised a lot of people last season when he played such a large role as rookie. The seventh round pick out of Kentucky started 12 games in his first NFL season after injuries struck both Alexander and former first-round pick Eric Stokes.

Valentine played well. He broke up nine passes and recovered a fumble that he returned for 50 yards. He also did well in pass coverage. According to Pro-Football-Reference.com, opposing quarterbacks completed just 57.6 percent of their passes when throwing to receivers covered by Valentine. Their quarterback rating was 84.8. That number is even more impressive when you consider Valentine did not intercept a pass.

Valentine still had things he needed to work on. He played his best when he could press receivers at the line of scrimmage. At times, however, Valentine got too physical and was flagged for defensive pass interference. Still, he had a promising rookie season and was looking forward to competing for a starting spot in 2024.

Unfortunately, things didn’t work out as planned for Valentine this season. He pulled a hamstring in training camp which prevented him from getting a fair chance at a starting job opposite Alexander. Stokes won the job as a result.

While Valentine was healthy for the season opener, he suffered an ankle injury in the Packers Week 2 win over the Colts which cost him the next two games. He returned to the lineup but played a smaller role until he got healthier.

When Stokes struggled, defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley didn’t turn to Valentine. Instead, he moved Javon Bullard to the slot and slot corner Keisean Nixon was moved to the perimeter opposite Alexander. Rookie Evan Williams joined free agent signee Xavier McKinney as the starting safeties. Valentine found himself getting limited snaps on defense at first, but he did see more action when Alexander left games early due to injury.

Now the coaching staff has to decide how to best replace Alexander. Stokes has been struggling all season. Nixon has also been inconsistent, making some big plays but also getting beaten badly on too many other occasions.

Last week against Chicago, when Alexander left the game after appearing in just 10 plays, Valentine stepped up and played a major role. He played 64 snaps, or 89 percent of the team’s defensive plays.  

Head coach Matt LaFleur was pleased with Valentine’s performance. “I think he did a nice job,” LaFleur told reporters. “I thought there were a couple of instances where he was able to crack plays and make some tackles. And so, we’re excited about him. I think he’s got a huge upside.”

With Alexander out of the lineup, Valentine should see more snaps and may even get his first start of the season Sunday when the Packers host the 49ers.

But, Hafley has said Valentine will have to earn his playing time. “I think he’s done a nice job,” Hafley said when asked about Valentine. “But I do think there’s still competition in that room with him and Kei [Keisean Nixon] and Stokes. That’s what we want. They’re all going to play. You’ll see packages where in certain groupings all three of them will play.”

This is a big opportunity for Valentine. Stokes has struggled and doesn’t appear to be in the team’s plans beyond this season. Nixon has never proven himself to be a reliable cover corner. Valentine has the most upside of the available candidates and a chance to show the coaching staff that last season was no fluke.

The Packers will certainly miss Alexander. But if Valentine can step up and play well, the team can still defend the pass effectively until Alexander is able to return. Doing that will be vital if the team hopes to contend in the NFC this season.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (55)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
NFLfan's picture

November 23, 2024 at 10:44 am

The Packers need to stop relying on Jaire and his possible return. There are 6 games left and my guess is Alexander will play in 1 or 2. The conservative medical staff clearly gave him the green light and we are only now hearing he has had a PCL injury? There was complete transparency re: Love's MCL injury. Not so much about Jaire. He should be traded post-season. Valentine shows promise but he is not a true cornerback, however he is all GB has at the moment-SMH. The weakness in cornerback room is nothing new-it was known in pre-season.

I am not happy that GB does not have a decent Pass Rush nor CB room and too much pressure is then placed on Jordan Love and the new additions (McKinney, Wilson, Williams and Bullard) as a result. Green Bay needs to take a serious look at their Pass Rush and CB room. This is not on Hafley-it's personnel-related.

Please remove Walker & LVN @ least-sheesh.

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

November 23, 2024 at 12:45 pm

With Joe Barry gone, it is getting harder to ignore the elephant in the room when it comes to the continued disappointment on defense.

Josh Jackson, Savage, Stokes Quay, Wyatt, LVN are all high draft picks who have not played up to their draft status.

Oh, and Rashan Gary and Jaire Alexander are Gute's two best defensive picks and they might currently be the most overpaid players at Edge and CB in the NFL.

Gute has done much better acquiring veterans like Z and Preston Smith, Amos, Campbell (for 1 season at least), Rasul, and McKinney to play defense.

But his drafting on defense ... yuck.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 23, 2024 at 10:56 am

For those who down-voted my comments, why don't you come forward and openly address my comments?
Please talk about the regressed Pass Rush and how you would improve it. Talk about the CB room and honestly
discuss how we found ourselves in this predicament? Openly talk about why LVN and Walker are still on the field?
A team should be putting the best players on the field not first round picks who are not getting it.
I have nothing against Gutekunst as a person but I see his fingerprints and we should be allowed to openly discuss
what we see. Improvements cannot be made if we allow the same mistakes to be made with 1st round Defensive Draft Capital. We should not have feel we are censored. I know this is risky and my comments could be removed but
nothing I say is anything less than what I see.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:12 am

You're talking about censorship because a handful of people have down-voted your comment?

That's not censorship, that's other people using their freedom to express they don't agree with your comment.

This particular fan forum is almost entirely allowed to express thoughts freely without intervention. It is rare that moderation is required or applied here- typically only when the conversation drifts off the topic of sports and into the political realm or blatant hate- and even then, it is usually the last resort.

While it is true that too many down votes can hide your comment from users that have selected the "see fan friendly comments only" option, that is -their- personal choice to do so, and is not the default.

I understand your annoyance with those who simply down vote and move on without any dialogue or discourse, but this had zero to do with censorship. You haven't said anything remotely "risky" that would put them up for consideration of removal.. No one is stopping you from expressing yourself.. that's just melodramatic.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:44 am

@Oppy-
I get the feeling that this platform is sensitive to offending the Packer's Brass. Green Bay is a very small town and the contributors have to be aware of that phenomenon. Press access is important. I do appreciate that Lass and Herman recently took some risks.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:48 am

You actually believe that Packers' Brass gives a rat's ass about what obsessed people say on a fan site? Seriously? Please tell me you're joking.

0 points
0
0
TOMMY'63's picture

November 24, 2024 at 09:16 am

Its possible Gute,Murphy and the flower read packers blogs to get an idea of what the public thinks.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

November 24, 2024 at 12:06 pm

...In which case, a "censored" blog in which the moderators would be selectively removing posts that were critical of the Packers would serve no useful purpose.

Don't feed into the fantasy.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

November 23, 2024 at 01:09 pm

And only the government can be limited in its ability to censor comments. Private entities do it all the time. I got booted off a fan site for criticizing the writers. I can still criticize them all I want, just not on their platform.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

November 23, 2024 at 01:40 pm

Thanks for bringing up the fan friendly option. I wondered why so many of Stockholder's comments disappeared whenever I log in. Now I can enjoy more of his incoherent ramblings!

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:32 am

I rarely down vote anyone, and I didn't downvote this, but I'll try to shed some light.

We're 14th in Pressure %. That's average-ish, just like the 49ers, Steelers, Bills, and Ravens. We're 9th in pressure percentage, and the top 5 are Dallas, Detroit, Minnesota, Rams and Chiefs. Draw your own conclusion about the validity of those measures.

Walker and LVN are on the field because they're some of our better defenders. There's nobody on the practice squad, or on the street, or hiding out in a janitor's closet who's better. If you want to believe the backups are better, go for it, but the professionals who've worked with these guys for months don't agree with you. Walker leads the team in tackles. Do you know how many players in the NFL are the leading tackler on a Top 10 defense? 10. That's it.

Let's talk about the CB room honestly: We dress 5 CBs. When the season started, that would include Often Injured Alexander, Often Injured Stokes, Nixon, Valentine, and Ballentine. If everybody is healthy, that's a pretty decent group. But that happens about as often as my brother-in-law picking up the check at dinner, so we play who we've got. I thought we'd draft a corner instead of a RG in the first round, but we didn't.

You can look at the various measures, like completion %, opposing passer rating, interceptions, and we're pretty average-ish despite all the injuries.

You like to slam the defense. We're 10th in scoring defense, despite everything. Despite none of our players being any good, and our HC not being any good, and our DC's never being any good. If you take away Love's two pick sixes, we're giving up under 20 ppg. We held the Lions to 17.

Can you address that? How are the Packers able to achieve what they've done, defensively, with 'chicken feathers'? IMO, you can't. The only explanation is that the coaches and players are better than you understand.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

November 23, 2024 at 01:16 pm

Who cares how many tackles a middle LB has? If they're not leading the team something is wrong. Walker is tied for 114th in TFLs with 4. Wilson has played 289 less snaps and has 7 TFLs. Walker has a nice pass breakup last week but this is by far his worst year in coverage and he spends half the game looking lost and/or soft. If playing time was based on merit Wilson would be starting. I'm sure the other players realize it too and worry about it becoming an issue.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 04:10 pm

How do you consistently miss the point? It's not that he's a LB, it's that he leads the #10 defense in tackles.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

November 23, 2024 at 09:40 pm

How do you miss the point that a MLB SHOULD lead the team in tackles? They also should occasionally make some impact plays. Wilson does, Walker doesn't. That #10 ranking you love to bandy about so much is more in spite of Walker than because of him. To me when 10 points separate the #10 and #17 teams it's not great shakes. There's a bigger difference in points per game between #1 and #10 than #10 and #28.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 10:40 pm

How do you miss the point that the team puts it's best tackler in the position where he can make the most tacklers? Why is Walker in that position? Because the coaches think he's that guy. And is he getting it done? Yes!

35 fewer points...21 if the Love pick sixes are deducted....would have us in 5th place in scoring defense. 35 more points would have us at 23. So, that's what I think about your shakes.

And no, the #10 ranking is not in spite of their leading tackler. That's simply incorrect.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 24, 2024 at 08:03 am

You talking about Wilson ,or Cooper?

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:37 am

Since you ask:

Your comment did not address the topic. Instead, you pulled out your list of gripes with various players not named Valentine and the front office.

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

November 23, 2024 at 12:55 pm

Who cares if you get downvoted. I don’t. I probably have the record for downvotes, well, maybe second to stockholder. Nobody really knows diddley on this site, including myself. If we did we’d be working in the FO of an NFL team making some real bucks and not wasting time in here. If people don’t like what I say, they can lump it. Take it down the road and dump it.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

November 23, 2024 at 01:23 pm

Life is way too damn short to worry about what people you have never met think of you. If I don't get at least two down votes per comment I'm disappointed.

0 points
0
0
Gman1976's picture

November 23, 2024 at 02:02 pm

So true. So funny.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

November 24, 2024 at 03:34 am

Sorry, can't downvote this comment. Makes too much sense.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:05 am

I can help NFL Fan.
First- it's about being positive, per starters.
So let's go right to Valentine.
The only reason I feel he's in there,
is because Alexander is sand bagging.
JAs main complaint is the pass Rush!
He'll get burned like anyone without it.
Valentine is more physical.
So I believe this secondary is just fine
as long as the new safeties play.

As far as Walker goes.
The problem still is the trench and pass Rush.
You don't bench your leading tackler.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:27 am

@SH-Alexander is sand-bagging and it is about the weak Pass Rush. That is the truth.

Who is the 'secondary'-Nixon and Valentine?

Walker tackles 'after the fact' and does not have the comprehension skills necessary to be in a leadership position on D.
He is athletically gifted and could be used in a less strategic position.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:42 am

As far as Walker goes, he is the leading tackler. But most of the tackles take place after the first down has been achieved. He is also a liability in coverage, and always seems a step or two slow getting to the play. What he has is raw physical ability. What he lacks are instincts, a feel for the game, analyzing and blowing up plays at or near the LOS. That he is the defensive play caller is not a great plan. Too much responsibility for someone who should be concentrating on adjusting to the pro game, rather than passing along Hafley's defensive schemes to the rest of the team.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

November 23, 2024 at 01:30 pm

What's strange with Walker is he was above average in coverage as a rookie, average to slightly below average last year and terrible this year. At the very least he should be replaced by Wilson on passing downs. Period, end of story. Either he's not the brightest bulb in the bunch or has terrible study habits.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 23, 2024 at 02:16 pm

Scrub Talk.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 24, 2024 at 09:36 am

The kid from Kansas, Cobee Bryant, is an outstanding Cover Corner. His running mate is pretty good, too.
I would draft three CBs, Rounds One through Four, to replenish the perimeter. Remember Walsh WON a superbowl with three rookie DBs in the starting lineup. The trench is not a problem when the guy is 1:1 with the runner at the one yard line and whiffs on the plug, giving up the TD.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 24, 2024 at 01:18 pm

3 cbs? - That depends on the strength of the draft.
The trench still is the problem.
You wanted Sweat last year.
You still like Wyatt. -I Would never have taken him.
And now that Morgan is out.
He might never live up to his #1 status.

I'm going with CB and center as Gute's picks. 1 & 2

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 24, 2024 at 02:09 pm

Yes, rebuild the room and move Jaire along with Stokes and Nixon. Use the Money on a free agent DT/DE.. Three sacks for Wyatt and he missed a few games. 3.5 sacks for the multi-million man. He took Van Ness. They cannot get through T Sweat. With a guy like him the stunt game for Wyatt and the DE become more sucecssful. Morgan should be where he belongs at OT. He is still better than Sua. Who knows the extent of his pre-season i shoulder injury? Then they put him inside.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:09 am

I agree that Valentine has done a good job. He isn’t perfect, but who is?

A more intensive pass rush would help all the defensive backs and especially whoever takes Alexander’s place.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:41 am

Valentine is a Day 3 pick who played about as well as you could reasonably hope for as a rookie. He hasn't gotten on the field as much this year because we play 3 safeties, Nixon, and Stokes. quite a bit of the time.

The pass rush would benefit from a secondary that could cover for another half- second. We're 9th in pressure percentage, and every game has plays where just a little better coverage would have been a sack. You could line up Reggie White, Deacon Jones, and Lawrence Taylor, but unless guys are covered, the QB will just throw it to an open guy before they can get to him.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 24, 2024 at 09:01 am

Many thumbs up if I could LH. I am not exonerating the Packer pass rush, but no DL regularly gets home in under 2.5 seconds. The secondary generally has to cover for about three seconds to give the pass rush a chance for a sack.

A defense has to work together to be successful. A secondary has to cover for three seconds and then the pass rush has to get home and pressure (or sack) the QB. If both parts don't happen, the offense will be successful. While the Packer pass rush could be better, the lack of sacks is not all their fault.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

November 24, 2024 at 11:11 am

I agree. However, the rush doesn’t have to have a sack to affect the quarterback. With shorter QBs it can block his vision . Hands in the air take away some routes, and hits even late ones can intimidate the quarterback. Intimidated quarterbacks have poor footwork and timing, making passes easier to defend.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 24, 2024 at 01:50 pm

In a sense, Guam, all sacks are coverage sacks. The better the coverage, the more opportunity for a sack.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:20 am

Most people were surprised the Packers didn't draft a CB earlier than the end of the seventh round, and this is exactly why. No timetable for Jaire's return? Valentine filled in reasonably well last season, so we're going to need an encore.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:42 am

You can never have too many guys who can cover and tackle. I would have rather had a CB than a RG in the first.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

November 23, 2024 at 12:17 pm

I would agree, but hopefully Morgan will be able to claim that tackle spot at some point in the future.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 12:51 pm

I hope so, otherwise he's Jason Spriggs.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

November 23, 2024 at 10:59 pm

Ward, I think you're being a little too hard on the Beaver.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:29 am

It's the Pass Rush. Perhaps Gary and Clark could grant a locker-room interview and explain to fans
what is going on with them.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:47 am

You should check your facts before you say stuff like that.

9th in pressure %. We have 25 sacks in 10 games, and four of the teams that are just ahead of us have played one more game, so we're clearly above average in that measure. Same story on tackles for loss.

I remember how much our pass rush improved when we acquired Woodson. It's amazing what a difference an extra half-second of coverage makes.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 24, 2024 at 08:18 am

They bagged Woodson in 2006. When Raji and Clay Matthews came onboard in 2009, the pass rush was augmented and Cullen Jenkins saw less dbl teams. Matthews and Raji supplied 20 sacks in 2010. Pass rush delivers the pressure.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 23, 2024 at 11:51 am

NFL scouting report on Walker: one of the negatives

'Walker can also get caught up in pursuit and take incorrect angles, or overshoot his intended tackle. He’ll need to be more consistent in recognizing the correct routes to the ball carrier'

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

November 23, 2024 at 12:03 pm

This article has nothing to do with Quay Walker.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 12:54 pm

OMG!! He has negatives!!! I thought first round picks were supposed to be perfect, or pretty close.

A scouting report from how many years ago? How many practices? How much coaching? And all he's doing is leading the team in tackles. Everybody responsible for this should be staked out over an anthill and then get stepped on by an elephant.!!!

Seriously, there's a book, it's called The Bell Curve. I'd encourage people to read it if they haven't already

Edit: I was being sarcastic. I didn't realize there was an actual book called that which uses the bell curve to support an argument that I think is just plain wrong in some of the prime assumptions.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

November 23, 2024 at 01:34 pm

The Bell Curve was a piece of garbage but this isn’t the place to argue about Charles Murray and his ideas.

If “football ability “ whatever that is, has a normal distribution in the whole population, in the pros. you’re only seeing the far right end of the curve. The truly outstanding guys are rare and the vast majority are the benchwarmers and JAGs who will be forgotten in a few years.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 04:13 pm

I didn't understand why a book on statistical distributions would cause a reaction like that, so I Googled, and to my surprise, that's actually the title of a book that contains ideas that I don't agree with. I apologize for the confusion.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

November 23, 2024 at 03:07 pm

fangirl, here's what I see. I see a former 49ers fan who gave up on her team because the QB position was in flux for a number of seasons. Under the guise of appreciating a generational talent in Aaron Rodgers, you became a Rodgers fan and spent some time at TC in Green Bay. Since, you've been searching for an audience here at CHTV for whatever reason. In the past you've implored Packers fans to rise up in the face of their learned helplessness and overthrow the defective Board of Directors. You shared all the feels about what Matt LaFleur is and isn't as a man and a coach. You've ventured out as a self-appointed rebel in search of a cause.

Last season you were stuck on how our CBs needed to "block better." You had not yet integrated "CB room" into your lexicon, so your go-to was to call them out for "poor blocking." This season, you have taken on Jaire and Rashan as your personal projects to expose as lazy, money-grabbing frauds who must be banished. You've added Kenny Clark to that group now as well. Now I see, per your keen eye, that Jaire is "sand-bagging" with a torn PCL. What's that all about? Have you ever been in any situation where teammates depend upon each other and work toward a goal?

Your posts consistently regurgitate some form of faux outrage about wasted draft capital, no pass rush, uppity players with no character, Gute as a mouth-breathing miscreant, and how "we" need to do something about it. I'd venture you're not getting the replies you crave because you post the same content ad nauseum. Are you hoping for a day when you win the internet with 100% upvotes? Maybe you're craving that reply that says "yes, Gute brought us here to this hellhole of a 7-3 team with no pass rush and lazy, low-character players, and you are 100% correct fangirl, here's a donut and a Certificate of Appreciation." Get a grip, FFS!

As far as your use of "we," I'm going to close with a quote from my high school industrial arts teacher. Whenever someone in the class, a teenager who knew it all, spoke for anyone other than themselves by using "we", Mr. N would say "We? What you got a turd in your pocket?"

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

November 23, 2024 at 05:16 pm

Leotis, I think that may leave a bruise

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 23, 2024 at 06:24 pm

Bitter and Leo-
I tell what I feel is the truth-
The Pass Rush is stalled, the CB room is essentially non-existent, Jaire is making business decisions and the GM drafts poorly when it comes to Defensive first round picks.
Good luck to MacKinney and Co. who have to carry grown men.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 23, 2024 at 07:18 pm

Yeah, hard to believe we're going to be 8-3 and with our next game at home against a weak road team. If we get to 9-3, what's the reason? I mean, I need a theory that accounts for us being 9-3 with a stalled pass rush and non-existent CB room.

Magic? The overarching greatness of other players on the team? Divine Providence? Luck?

What you "feel is the truth" is just baseless bullshit without some actual facts to support your feelings.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

November 23, 2024 at 10:54 pm

Honestly. The best thing you could possibly do is open a fan duel account, or something at Caesar's and bet heavily. You are destined for riches, of this I am certain. Bet on football and follow those vibes. You will be rewarded.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

November 23, 2024 at 02:59 pm

I like Valentine, he plays with heart.

Now, I don't know much but am quite good-looking. Jaire and all his games being missed remind me a tad of Zadarius's back issues and games missed.

The gales of Nov and soon to be December will change a little of our teams identity. With the exception of a few players, the Packers tend to play better in milder or climate-controlled environments.

I would like to thank CheeseHead TV for nominating me as the best messenger of truth regarding professional football and our beloved Packers. I will accept the nomination but will need you all's patience as I do a rough draft of my speech should I become victorious.

Your welcome,
Pantz in a 3 point Stanze

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 23, 2024 at 06:25 pm

Annoying.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

November 24, 2024 at 09:54 am

Like a mosquito in the tent at 2:00 am.... :D

>^••^<

0 points
0
0