Cory's Corner: Sign Aaron Rodgers Now
But if you’re the Packers, what the heck are you waiting for? The longer you wait, the more the price is going to go up.

The moment the Falcons inked Matt Ryan to a record-breaking contract making him the first $30 million per year player, I chuckled.
When does it end? I honestly thought that was going to be Aaron Rodgers’ number, but now the NFL’s QB1 will be getting somewhere close to $33 million per year.
I said and have continued to say that Rodgers deserves a blank check. He is the heart, soul, brains and skeletal system of this team. Rodgers knows that he’s the reason the Packers have Super Bowl or bust expectations.
But if you’re the Packers, what the heck are you waiting for? The longer you wait, the more the price is going to go up. What surprises me is that there is actually a faction of people that want the Packers to place two franchise tags on Rodgers in 2020 and 2021 — which would cost over $61 million.
First of all, you just don’t treat someone of Rodgers’ ilk like that. He’s not only just respected around the league, but he’s the best at his position and it will likely create contract shockwaves down the line for the Packers.
Secondly, the Packers aren’t really saving anything. Granted, Rodgers was nicked up last year, but as a whole, Rodgers has been pretty healthy. And he has said several times that he wants to play into his 40s. “The nutrition and fitness (knowledge) has made leaps and bounds,” Rodgers said at last year’s training camp. “We will see how long Tom (Brady) can make it. We’ll let him set the bar, then I’ll try to go match him.”
I don’t think Rodgers is bluffing. He understands that it’s in his best interest to take as few hits as possible and the offense helps him out with quick passes , which eliminates the pass rush.
It’s amazing how small the memories are in the NFL. Of the top 5 quarterbacks according to average money for 2018, No. 2 (Kirk Cousins), No. 3 (Jimmy Garoppolo) and No. 4 (Matthew Stafford) are all unproven.
Teams have become desperate to unearth anyone that resembles a competent quarterback. Have a good one and you have a chance at a title but if you have an average one or worse, then your team will be lucky to see the playoffs.
That’s why it’s time for the Packers to make this deal happen. If that means frontloading the deal with a signing bonus ala Tom Brady to lessen the impact on the cap number, so be it.
But Rodgers has to realize that as soon as he drives his deal off the lot, other top quarterbacks will be aiming to plant their flag atop the salary mountain.
Joe Flacco’s $120.6 million deal made him the highest-paid player in NFL history in 2013. Joe Flacco. Garoppolo was the leader in the clubhouse this spring with the $137.5 million he signed with San Francisco, but now Ryan is No. 1 with a cool $150 million.
The clock is ticking Packers. The longer the wait, the more the price.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn
__________________________




Comments (73)
EddieLeeIvory
May 05, 2018 at 07:00 am
I like your blank check term.
This guy IS our team.
WITH him, as you'll recall after he beat Dallas last year with the late TD pass to Adams, which came right after the defense completely failed to hold the lead he had just given them, the team was THE SUPER BOWL FAVORITE.
WithOUT him, we were down there with the bad news Bears & Browns.
He deserves about 33% of the team payroll at least.
Break the bank Packers & give this man the $ respect he's earned.
GBPDAN1
May 05, 2018 at 06:05 pm
Aaron's going to get paid a lot and soon. They were waiting on Matt Ryan. Yes, AR is worth the money as lesser talented QBs are breaking the back.
And yes, it's going to effect our cap considerably, especially compared to teams like the Eagles, Rams and even the Cowboys to a lesser degree, that have quality QBs on Rookie deals.
This is why we have to start hitting in the draft, much better than TT had lately. We need some young difference makers on rookie deals that can start soon(like CM3 did), then some quality players on rookie deals, some higher paid quality vet starters and the rest young (cheap) roster filler players that hopefully develop.
Here's to our last 2-3 drafts stepping up!
Carlos Martin
May 05, 2018 at 07:04 am
You know teams can't just sign players whenever they want as the player as a day too, right?
Rodgers and his agent likely have been waiting for the other QBs to set the market.
Bearmeat
May 05, 2018 at 07:41 am
Exactly. If I'm Arod, I want to wait as long as I can. Maybe even through the year to see what direction the Packers are headed in under Gute.
NickPerry
May 05, 2018 at 07:10 am
My sister and I discussed while I was stuck in traffic on the 101 Freeway in Los Angeles yesterday how much money does Rodgers actually need. Before you take my head off I understand WHY Rodgers wants a Brinks Truck and then some FULL of cash for his services. He's proven time and again he IS one of the GOAT at the QB position and if there is a player worth over $30 million a year it would be Rodgers.
Last season the Packers were 4-1 with Rodgers, 3-6 without him needing OT to win two of those games against the Browns 0-16 and the Bucs 5-11. I left off the week 5 game where Rodgers was injured and the Carolina game where Rodgers was about 65% and shouldn't have been on the field in the first place. At least IMO. There's no telling what might have happened in week 5 had Rodgers not been injured or in Carolina in December. My point is Rodgers PROVED without much doubt without him their screwed, with him they'll contend.
What I'd love to see Rodgers do is sign a contract that's TEAM friendly and $32 million IS NOT team friendly. If Rodgers REALLY wants to win more SB's the best way to accomplish that is signing a contract around $22 to even $25 million a year. This would give Gutekunst room to sign FA and put a TEAM around Rodgers, not a one man show. I think Gutekunst has already showed he's willing to bring in impact FA players in his first season and would have signed another had Rodgers contract been in the back of his mind the whole time.
Trust and believe Aaron, if you make $22 million a season for the next 5 or 6 years assuming you stay healthy, you'll have more than enough money for SEVERAL lifetimes. Again I get WHY you want the $30 plus million a season. But signing the richest contract in NFL history is going to make it so much harder to to bring one, two, or even three more Lombardi Trophies HOME.
Bearmeat
May 05, 2018 at 07:29 am
I seriously doubt ARod does this. Let's not forget that Brady's wife makes more than any football player ever will. That plays into the Brady salary. Also, Rodgers is a different QB than Tawmy. Tawmy NEVER had ARod's arm, nor his improvisatory skills. A full 1/3 of ARod's magnificent game is extending plays and stressing the defense. Even back in the late 00's at Brady's peak, he didn't have the athletic ability or arm strength to make those types of throws off platform. So ARod will get hurt more than Brady does. I think he knows it too.
Plus, I think there's some ego in there for Aaron. I don't blame him. I probably would be the same. He is the best football player on the planet at the biggest position in sports and wants his salary to reflect it.
If GB is going to win another title, it's going to have to do so either without ARod, or with him eating up 35% of the cap. Ugh.
dobber
May 05, 2018 at 08:10 am
35%!!! Yikes!
(I think you meant $35M?)
Bearmeat
May 05, 2018 at 08:14 am
Yeah. 35m. Sorry. Lack of caffeine. lol.
That said, I do think that a percentage of the cap would be something that ARod's camp might go after too. But it won't be 35%.
Packerpasty
May 05, 2018 at 09:11 am
So why would Rodgers trust much of anything this organization has done toward winning a Super Bowl...I just read an article where writers were talking about how Cleveland hasn't surrounded King James with enough good players and they said organizations with super stars like James and they specifically mentioned Rodgers, they get lazy and want the superstar to "win it all" for them...that is more than apparent with the Packers...Get all you can get Arod, you more than deserve it as we saw last year..McCarthy the great QB guru obviously has been coasting on Rodgers coattails..as seen by the tremendous job he has done with the GumChewer......Packers are awash in cash, another sledding hill in the works over at Disney land north....
Oppy
May 05, 2018 at 01:47 pm
I firmly believe Rodgers stance on his contract is less tied to personal Ego and more about the fact that with his role as the best player at the most valuable position in professional football, whatever contract he signs will directly impact the potential earnings of every single football player in the NFL.
He is literally setting the market for all professional football players.
I think if it was just Aaron in a vacuum, he'd probably take a team-friendly but still reasonable contract.
But Aaron is a union man. He'll be doing this contract for the players association. He's basically playing the people's champion for NFL players with this contract. I believe to him, this is bigger than him, bigger than the Packers.
marpag1
May 05, 2018 at 01:56 pm
Personally, I'd be amazed if that thought has even entered his mind.
Oppy
May 05, 2018 at 02:35 pm
I don't know, Marpag. Over the years in snippets and interviews, he's given me the impression he is kind of a social conflict type guy. He has spoken about teachers, firefirefighters, and policemen's rights to collectively bargain in the state of WI before, has always talked about NFLPA issues with some level of reverence, and clearly sees QBs and other NFL players as a brotherhood as opposed to seeing them as guys who play for other teams first and foremost. I believe he sees just how much money the NFL generates, and I believe he sees how many players ruin their bodies during short careers for the owners. For every Aaron Rodgers, there's dozens of Jonathan Franklins. Larger caps mean more money to be spread around for everyone.
marpag1
May 05, 2018 at 02:58 pm
I can't really argue with your take on things, Oppy. You could be right. But personally, I'm very skeptical.
When it comes to contracts, fans and players always talk about "hometown discounts" and about the desire to win championships and loyalty to the team or the city, etc., etc., but I'm pretty cynical about all of that.
In the end, I think the overwhelming majority of contract decisions come down to the simple question... "If I sign this, how much money will be deposited to my account?"
Big Moe
May 05, 2018 at 03:34 pm
Yes, I think you nailed it, hate all you want, but there is no way ARod signs for less than Matt Ryan!
LayingTheLawe
May 07, 2018 at 11:35 am
Can you name a big star that has done this? Of course Aaron Rodgers doesn't need the money. But all players seem to want that title of highest paid even if it only lasts for a week or two tail the next biggest contract arrives. Plus the agents and union have the players believing that they owe it to the rest of the players to get as much as they can to drag up the players part of the take overall. A hometown deal at this point means a mill or two at most and not the sort of discount you are hoping for.
Lare
May 05, 2018 at 07:12 am
The question isn't how much Rodgers is worth, it's how good of a team can the Packers maintain around him while they pay him what he's worth.
Packerpasty
May 05, 2018 at 09:13 am
well they haven't tried very hard in previous years have they...cash is not the problem..Packers knew this day was coming along time ago...charge more at the sledding hill..
Oppy
May 05, 2018 at 01:49 pm
There's this thing called a salary cap.
Look it up sometime when you have a few minutes.
TKWorldWide
May 06, 2018 at 09:54 am
Eggs
Act
Lee
!(!!!!!!)
(Those extra “!” are for you, Worztik!) (!!!!!)
Donster
May 05, 2018 at 07:58 am
I guess I have missed it. But I haven't seen in print or heard an interview where Rodgers demanded to be the highest paid QB in the NFL. I have heard members of the Packers organization say this, but not Rodgers.
He does need to be compensated. He is the face of the franchise, and when not injured, the entire NFL (unless your a Brady fan).
I do hope he knows that the less salary cap hit he is, the more the team has to bring in experienced players to help get him back to the SB. And that his ego isn't so large that he is just thinking about himself and thinks he is the only one who will get them the Lombardi trophy again. If TT were still GM, I think he would try to get every dime he could get, knowing that TT hasn't helped him the past few years.
I do agree with this article that the Packers need to get this done. Waiting will only cost more. Unfortunately that is how it works. I doubt that he will give the Pack a huge "Discount Double Check".
Cubbygold
May 05, 2018 at 12:05 pm
Yup, if hes optimistic he'll make the smart move and let ryan remain the highest paid qb. He may take 100% guaranteed which is fine
Chuck Farley
May 06, 2018 at 08:56 pm
Rogers waited till everyone else got paid to determine his worth. The way the pack do contracts compared to everyone else means top players up for renewal next year, Mathews, Perry, at al will be let go for cheaper late round picks. No money for them.
Tundraboy
May 05, 2018 at 08:30 am
Oh modern sports. Nothing like waking up to your baseball team Winning 13 out of 14 games but your football team's biggest concern is paying your quarterback and having money left over to field a professional team to go with him.
MITM
May 05, 2018 at 08:47 am
Lets go Yankees...and with what you said, the Vikings paid Cousins whatever they paid him and somehow are still paying more than a few guys at all different positions some very good money. I was hoping signing Cousins meant they would end up costing them somebody like Kendricks, but they just re-signed him a couple of weeks ago to a big contract.
So they are paying Cousins all that money, paid Griffen a ridiculous amount, Rhodes, Kendricks, Linval Joseph, Harrison Smith and those are just off the top of my head. They are going to pay Diggs eventually also. So i hate to use the Vikings as an example, however all of the guys i mentioned are making top money at their positions. Those idiots are making it work.
This is why I cant really freakout about Rodgers eventual contract when we already have Davante, Linsley, Bakhtiari, Daniels? under new contracts and most of our best players otherwise luckily are on rookie deals at least for another couple of years.
Lare
May 05, 2018 at 11:05 am
Minnesota is paying good money to productive players. The Packers are paying $43 million this season to Matthews, Cobb, Perry & Bulaga.
Thegreatreynoldo
May 05, 2018 at 12:00 pm
Things will get tight for MN in 2019. They have $34M in cap space (assuming the cap increases $12.8M to $190M, not a given) and have to resign Anthony Barr, Danielle Hunter, Stephon Diggs, and Sheldon Richardson. That is doable, but it will leave them hard up against the cap, most likely. Barr won't be cheap but he won't cost a massive amount: he's an off the ball LB with 1 sack in 2017 and 2 sacks in 2016 - he isn't in the great pass-rushing OLB category. Career sacks over 4 years = 10. But Diggs and Hunter will cost a bunch.
The ageless wonders, Brian Robison and Terrence Newman, will also be FAs who might retire, assuming they make the team in 2018.
MITM
May 05, 2018 at 05:49 pm
I think out of the 4 guys you mentioned the only lock to be resigned is Diggs. I would like to think that they made a choice between Kendricks and Barr and chose Kendricks. Could be wrong. But I dont think they will be able to keep those 4 guys, probably 2 out of the 4. Who knows though
MITM
May 05, 2018 at 05:54 pm
Im not prerending I know what type of cap hit it would be but I would imagine a couple of those guys are in their last years in Green Bay this upcoming season. Bulaga may get the Sitton treatment this summer its anybodys guess. We are certainly going edge rusher in Round 1 next year so if Clay doesnt have a renaissance under Pettine or refuses a paycut his time could be up. Perry I feel like could have the biggest cap hit if he was cut after this season. But i really have no idea
Chuck Farley
May 06, 2018 at 08:59 pm
You got that right. Same reason the black hawks died this year. Three top players getting most of the money all got old and slower at same time. Can't trade them, can't rebuild due to lack of money. All the eggs in one basket
Chuck Farley
May 06, 2018 at 09:02 pm
Ditto the wild two guys 33 % of the salary cap. Long term bad contracts can kill a franchise
Since'61
May 05, 2018 at 08:46 am
Whatever the final contract numbers are, I agree with Cory that the sooner the Packers get the deal done the better. I believe Rodgers will end up with either a large up front signing bonus or more likely a flexible contract which keeps Rodgers as the highest paid QB based on annual salary cap increases. So, in effect, he will receive a % of the cap amount each season.
If Rodgers played for a team with an owner he would just walk into the salary negotiations and say "Hi, partner".
As for the impact of signing FAs, which FA will the Packers find who makes an impact on the game that Rodgers does? That would require a Reggie White type of signing and teams won't let that type of player get to FA any longer. TT signed Julius Peppers and he played well but not like Reggie. We had Woodsen who played great for the Packers but still only one SB while he was here.
The current formula, right or wrong, is good to great QB play, supported by a talented, young, less expensive cast, ala the Eagles or the Pats. I agree with signing FAs for their experience and for depth but signing expensive FAs will get the team in cap hell before it is like!y to produce an SB.
Rodgers fills seats, improves TV ratings, win games, gets to the playoffs, sells jerseys etc. and provides a respectable face for the league. That means more $$$ for everyone involved. Sign him soon, so that the numbers are no longer a moving target, and move on. As I have said before, it's only money and it's not ours.
Thanks, Since '61
Packerpasty
May 05, 2018 at 09:15 am
well said...think about Gummer or Kizer as the face of a .500 or so organization....return of the "gory years"....not far away perhaps..
Ferrari Driver
May 05, 2018 at 10:40 am
Liked your take "61".
Your last comment "As I have said before, it's only money and it's not ours." No, but a lot of it was our money before we pay for the season tickets, jerseys, drinks, and food each year.
Like you, I've seen Green Bay quarterbacks play the game back in the Tobin Rote days all the way to our current guy behind center and I will admit as NP say, Rodgers is the GOAT and chances are that he will be paid as such.
Since'61
May 06, 2018 at 09:38 am
Ferrari you are correct that much of the money was ours before we spend it on tickets, concessions etc... But we also get what we pay for so if we're going to pay ever increasing prices we might as well get to watch the GOAT.
Since we both go back to the "Tobin Rote" days we both know that neither ticket prices or player salaries have ever decreased and are not likely to do so in near future.
Also, I believe that Rodgers is probably approaching this as a B2B negotiation rather than a player/team negotiation. In the end it's a matter of how much value Rodgers believes his services are worth and how much the Packers are willing to pay for them. Either way we are looking at the largest contract in NFL history. Thanks, Since '61
Oppy
May 05, 2018 at 01:54 pm
I wonder how the NFL cap structure would handle it if a player actually worked out a compensation that was, let's say, worth a slice of the team's profit sharing AFTER they retire.
Cubbygold
May 05, 2018 at 12:03 pm
Team friendly deal = greater likelihood of more supporting talent. The lack of superbowls doesn't make this untrue. Rodgers is smart enough to understand that taking a team friendly deal doesn't guarantee a superbowl, only makes the team more competitive. He's competitive, he's not mailing his career in for an extra 5 mil a year
CheesyTex
May 06, 2018 at 01:40 pm
J.S. Re "leverage". Right on. IMO Packers leverage goes something like this -- We have you locked in for four years (including franchise tag years), there is no certainty you will be 100% after the 2018 injury, and your style of play is higher risk for injury during middle 30s.
Will Packers' total leverage be enough to get a team-friendly deal? IMO even Trump couldn't pull that off unless #12 wants GB more than anything else.
gr7070
May 05, 2018 at 09:45 am
The most likely best thing for the Packers is to let this contract expire and then franchise tag him for three years. Then move on to the next QB.
Likely not the popular thing or Rodgers preferred scenario, but from the Packers' perspective that's their best-case scenario of all the reasonably likely options.
And there's certainly no reason to sign an extension this season. Just adds more risk to the Packers.
I have no clue why so many fans are clamoring for an extension.
Cubbygold
May 05, 2018 at 11:58 am
Yup. The team has plenty of leverage in this negotiation.
Cartwright
May 05, 2018 at 10:40 am
The Packers have the upper hand here and will make Rodgers wait as he is still under contract.. He didn't get "nicked up" as the article states. It was a collar bone break on his throwing shoulder that needed 13 pins. If breaking a collar bone on your throwing shoulder is getting nicked up, how tough does a football player need to be I suspect they won't talk turkey, nor back up the truck for Matt Ryan type money until they are certain he can throw the ball like he used to. They will wait until training camp when they will know for sure what they've got until serious negotiations take place. What choice does Rodgers have?
Denise Chanterelle
May 05, 2018 at 11:18 am
Just pay the man.
Cubbygold
May 05, 2018 at 11:56 am
The proof is in the data. No team will contend paying a single player 30m a year or more. Anyone saying 'pay the man' just doesn't understand how a complex game is played...stick to checkers
https://www.google.com/amp/s/ftw.usatoday.com/2018/02/nfl-quarterback-sa...
Oppy
May 05, 2018 at 02:24 pm
I don't think the author understands exactly what he's measuring, or maybe the audience doesn't.
This doesn't even attempt to make a correlation between QB effectiveness and team success, which would have to be the starting point for making a case that it isn't viable to pay over a certain percentage of cap space to a QB if you want to win. We need to analyze if above average or great QB play is worth paying a premium for.
Cubbygold
May 05, 2018 at 04:42 pm
Lots of different points made in the article, but the main point is that no team has won a Superbowl while paying any player more than 13.1% of their cap space. Many have tried, justifying that their guy is worth a big deal, but none have succeeded. Paying a QB more than $23M this year means your team is going to rewrite the history books, this year 6 teams are taking that strategy
Oppy
May 06, 2018 at 02:24 am
Yeah, I get it.
Correlation does not necessarily indicate causation. That's the issue I have with this 13.1% cap thing that's going around.
marpag1
May 05, 2018 at 02:46 pm
"The proof is in the data. No team will contend paying a single player 30m a year or more."
Um, just out of curiosity, how much data have you gleaned from teams that pay a single player 30M a year or more? Matt Ryan signed yesterday.
Stick to checkers?
Oppy
May 05, 2018 at 02:00 pm
With the new QB salaries out there, i believe when Rodgers does hang it up, the Packers should strip the whole thing down and rebuild as a defensive powerhouse.
It won't be popular, but frankly, they should probably start as soon as he signs a ridiculous contract. Gut the offense, let Rodgers make it work through his sheer dominance, and start investing in top-tier defense first and foremost.
I expect the entire league will move in this direction, since the QBs are now setting salaries too high to make team play sustainable. The market correction will be building defense to devalue the QB position until the market prices corrects and comes back down to earth.
Let's get ahead of the curve and invest it all in defense now, so when Rodgers retires, there will be less onus on the Packers to find "the next great QB".
WKUPackFan
May 05, 2018 at 02:27 pm
AR was just interviewed at Churchill Downs. He said he is picking Audible, since it is his favorite thing to do at the line of scrimmage. He also said MM gave him a tip on Vino Rosso.
worztik
May 05, 2018 at 02:36 pm
Who cares about horse abuse and rich people watching???
WKUPackFan
May 05, 2018 at 04:14 pm
113,510 at Oaks Day yesterday. 48,134 on hand for Thurby. 158,070 for Derby 2017.
People care.
worztik
May 05, 2018 at 06:34 pm
Only you ducks from KY!!! No one with a brain cares around here...
worztik
May 05, 2018 at 06:35 pm
Very small numbers in the big picture... just go away!!! This is a football blog not a horsey book !!!
WKUPackFan
May 05, 2018 at 05:02 pm
AR also always brings teammates with him for Derby weekend. Randall Cobb is almost always with him. Jimmy Graham and David Bakhtiari are here. One person said that half of the Packers offense is with AR.
Some people might consider that team camaraderie.
worztik
May 05, 2018 at 06:36 pm
I consider it rich people flaunting their wealth!!!
WKUPackFan
May 06, 2018 at 06:55 am
157,813 turned out for yesterday's Derby. The eighth largest crowd ever, on the wettest day in Derby history (2.83 inches of rain).
Again, people care.
Let us use a 10%/90% ratio for the rich/not so rich delineation. That gives us 142,031 not so rich people in attendance. If you want to say "the crowd skews more wealthy", then let us use 30%/70%. That yields 110,469 not so rich people.
That goofy class warfare stuff will not fly here.
Pauly
May 05, 2018 at 02:27 pm
Too bad Rodgers probably because of ,, the the contract,, can't structure a deal where he can get the best OL protection in the NFL.
Such as, he sets a base of 35 mil and only takes a guaranteed 20 mil for 6 yrs.
With the extra 15 mil being spent extra on the OL with the top FAs available. Adding 3 mil per position to protect himself as a player.
Lot better to retire healthy with 120 mil than more mils and with an all busted up body. He's already made more money than he can spend.
Oppy
May 07, 2018 at 12:50 pm
"He's already made more money than he can spend."
Man, I wish I could say that's true, but there's a number of retired pro athletes that have proven otherwise. ;)
Oppy
May 07, 2018 at 01:38 pm
Deleted double post.
DetroitSUCKS
May 05, 2018 at 02:33 pm
For all the booohoooo this org sucks , have you considered how many quality player we have lost to injury over the years ? They let some guys walk who they shouldn't of some db's where they thought the next kid was ready mistakes happen. I realize injuries in football are called an excuse but damn they have had some bad luck too.. want an org that truly sucks ball nectar check out Detroit .....top paid QB who hasn't won a thing ...yeah I get team game" They would take AR or Statsford in a nano second
worztik
May 05, 2018 at 02:34 pm
I have never understood how people can say, “he’s worth 10 wins a season!”?? Not logical or provable except by using last year’s awful QB play as verification and viability for that statement! Why don’t we just say that having no decent players in the DB or on D in general “cost” us 10 games last year? Makes about as much sense. Wait until this season is through or almost done to renegotiate his contract! There really is no hurry and as said previously, we aren’t 100% certain how his shoulder will hold up. It could snap again in game #1 and then where will we be? I’m anxious to see what Kizer can do with a “TEAM” around him, when he’s not running for his life! He’s no ARod but, he’s not a Hundley either!!!
Ryan Graham
May 05, 2018 at 03:38 pm
It's not as simple as it may seem. I agree obviously the man needs to he paid "what he wants" I'm using that term loosely because its being g thrown around so liberally as if hes worth 50M. Gute has some leverage as well in this negotiation.
I'll start by saying I believe Rodgers is the best in the game, before he broke his throwing arm collar bone. Before everyone goes bonkers I'm NOT saying hes going to decline because of that. For all any of us know he could come back better than ever...he has made a habit of that. But no one knows, not even himself. This is more severe than when he was in his late 20s and he broke his left collar bone. Hes older, slightly more fragile whether he likes it or not, that's life. he might be slowing the breakdown process, but father time is undefeated.
I can not emphasize enough that this is not MY thought. Im just playing devils advocate to bring to light the fact that nothing is imminent. The reality is that it's an ongoing negotiation, soon does not mean immediately following Ryan's contract. For all we know, Rodgers wants to play a few games into the regular season to potentially raise his pricetag. It's very possible we dont see a contract for quite a while, possibly October.
John Galt
May 05, 2018 at 03:52 pm
Sign him for a maximum of three years, preferably two and use the higher of next year's (2) draft picks to get a QB in the draft. He will be 35 in December and should not get a 5 year contract like Ryan
Samson
May 05, 2018 at 08:37 pm
No doubt that AR has been this team for the past several years. ---- But, let him play out season 2018 (on current contract) and see what happens.
I'm a Packer Fan but I'm not obsessed with any ONE player. --- Loved Bart until he became the HC. --- If I remember correctly, Nick Foles led the SB champions to a "V" just a few months ago.
It's still all about TEAM.
porupack
May 06, 2018 at 06:41 am
The solution to this dilemma comes back to the players association. If the Players Association is ok with very lopsided salary structure; some making $30 million per year, and others at 6 figure salary, then fine.
But if Players association would put a cap on any individual salary, then teams could field more veterans and not have to send talent to the unemployment line, in order to fill the team with cheap rookies to support the 1 star.
CheesyTex
May 06, 2018 at 01:56 pm
Very interesting. If it is truly an association for all players, your idea of caps makes sense. They did it to rookies to "protect" the veterans, so why not caps by position?
flackcatcher
May 06, 2018 at 06:45 pm
This is unknown territory for both the NFLPA and the owners. Rodgers contract would be the cherry on top for both. Interesting times up coming.
LASVEGAS-TOM
May 06, 2018 at 11:32 pm
You guy's really get me. Personally, I hope AR breaks the Bank. You're all worried about how much his contract will be. None of you ever mention the fact that "The Great" Roger Goodell made $44 million last year, not including his year end bonus. Twice as much as AR. He's asking for $49.5 Million this year. Doesn't that Piss any of you off!!. How about you OPPY? Can you agree with me on this one? Get as much as you can AR, at least you deserve it.
LVT
Oppy
May 07, 2018 at 12:59 pm
I'm flattered, LVT.
I think you are missing the point of most posters here.
First, how much Rodger Goodell makes doesn't affect the Packers ability to sign players or win games. So let's ignore that.
If there was no salary cap, I'm fairly confident most everyone here would be more than happy to see Rodgers take as much as he can. Hell, some of the posters would probably say he's "earned the right" to have his contract renegotiated every year to make sure he's the highest paid QB every season, and he should be the one to decide when he calls it quits.
But there IS a salary cap.. and most of the posters here are more concerned with the Packers' ability to field a competitive team with the ability to win a championship, than paying Aaron Rodgers the most money possible.
There's a balancing act that needs to happen here at some point. Can't have both. Needs to be compromise. LAS VEGAS TOM?
LASVEGAS-TOM
May 07, 2018 at 05:11 pm
OPPY, So then you don't see any problem with Roger Goodell making twice what most Qb's are making. I'm well aware of a Salary Cap. That wasn't my point. Maybe I should have said that. Roger Goodell making that kind of money is INSANE. It reminds me of my Boss, who didn't know what day of the week it was. All he did was hold a meeting once a week & tell us we weren't working hard enough. I'm sure you & a lot of fans on this post can relate to that one. And for that, all he got was twice my pay, 3 times my pension, & a year & a half salary ($150,000) to walk out the door at 62. I got Nothing. That's what I meant about Roger Goodell. He reminds me of all the Management I grew up with & have Nothing but Distain for. Oppy, I have a lot of Respect for you, but not when it comes to CB's. Can't wait to see Williams back on the field. He's too Small, too Slow, can't Catch a ball, & can't Tackle. I'm still counting the Grand I lost on the Seattle game. Now we went & drafted another 5'10" CB. I must be getting Senile in my old age. Everyone's worried about the Salary Cap, but let's make sure we have $15 Mill to throw at CM3 to watch from the sideline. Anyway, my point was only about The Great Goodell's Salary. I'm also glad you're Flattered. I'm actually trying to be Nice to you. At some point you'll have to agree with me.
LVT
LASVEGAS-TOM
May 08, 2018 at 02:59 pm
Jonathan Spader, I'm still trying to forget it. I'm Union & Proud Of It!! I did 40 yr's & 4 months in a Union Shop, & Hated every day of it. But, I made a Very Good Living. I started in 68, & made $10K in both 68 & 69, which was Pretty Good money for the time. I was Very Lucky in my life, & also Very Unlucky. I've been a Collector all of my life. Everything I touched seemed to turn to Gold. I started in 1957 at 10 collecting Records, which I still do today. I have a Huge record collection. As a Teen I started collecting coins. I have a Complete Morgan Dollar Collection, which I'm looking to sell. I've had Classic cars all my life, 3 1956 Chev RagTops, a 57 RagTop, a 56 Chev StepSide 383 Stroker. A 62 Chev StepSide, a 68 Mustang Ragtop that I bought for my son, & the last car I did was a 70's Corvette. I may have had a few more. I made Big Money on all of them. I miss them. Old Cars are like Old Girlfriends. You never really forget them. Every now & then you'd like to take one out for another Nice Ride!! Know what I mean? I collected Coke Machines, Gas Pumps, & Jukeboxes which I still have 3 Beautiful ones, & am always looking for another.
I should write a book. I started Gambling in 1973 on Horses. That nearly got me Divorced. Horses are Brutal. I hit a $5 Trifecta for $700 Saturday in the Derby. It took a long time to learn how to bet horses. I don't recommend it. I was losing $100 - $150 a week which was a lot of money back then. I had a Mortgage. At the same time I was betting with a Bookie out of New York on Football & losing every week, but I wasn't betting very big.
I lost my only son in a car accident in 1990. only child. In the mid 80's, for Fathers day, he bought me a book written by Wayne Root titled "Betting Sports To Win" He's the guy that taught me the Contrarian Theory of Betting, & the Trends that occur in the NFL year after year. That's when I started winning year after year. Unfortunately my son never got a chance to see the end result. I could look at a sheet, & see 7 games that I would win. That sort of came to an end last year. I guess I've lost my nerve. I had a good run the end of the year, but I could feel it coming to an end, so I've pretty much quit Betting Football. I Retired at 60.
My wife & I wound up with a Beautiful house here in Vegas, Beautiful Pool, Palm Trees & 2.8 miles from GVR. We go twice a week to play slots.
I got laughed at for saying I think I found an edge on slots. YOU CANNOT BEAT A SLOT MACHINE, but the start of the year, I was $5K up at GVR, so was my wife. Jan I made a Thousand, Feb broke about even, March made $2200, & April 15th, I was up $480. We went in one night, & all of my machines were gone, taken out of the Casino. I think I was on to something, but that's all done now. Realistically you never win in a Casino. You just borrow the money. I don't like Betting, unless I feel like I have an edge. Right now it looks like I'm pretty much done.
I hope GB had a Great Draft. I didn't follow it. I'll probably take a Futures Bet on them. It would be Great if AR could get another SB, or 2 or 3. One thing I'm looking forward to is watching Jordy Nelson with Oakland. They seem to have the Oakland game on just about every week.
LVT
Oppy
May 07, 2018 at 09:41 pm
LVT, I've given up bitching about how much other people make. Until I own my own business, it's wasted effort.
For what it's worth, I've always thought that if i was ever successful enough at building my own business, and became one of those owners where the business was more or less run by my employees, I'd see absolutely nothing wrong with those employees actually earning more than I take home.
as far as the NFL goes, the owners decide how much they want to pay an ass like Goodell, and they also decide how much they want to pay the players. I'm all for players making as much as they can, because they are the spokes that turn the wheel that create billions of dollars. That's also why I don't freak out when fast food workers say they want more money, too. If you work full time, you should grab every cent you can take from your employer, because most of 'em ain't gonna give it to you from the bottom of their heart.
croatpackfan
May 07, 2018 at 02:54 am
First of all, my opinion on the matter is that Aaron (and his agent) and Packers (Gutekunst & Ball) has to make that deal. I know that Aaron is clever enough to understand he has to be paid wealthy (to make the level for his value in comparison to the others), but he also wants team to be competitive, not for one season and than good bye...
So, all of you that wants all in this or next year and than 10 years of misery I do not understand. Why would Aaron stay in Green Bay if Packers would be in Cap Hell and had to release good players or would not be able to sign promising rookies for future...
I think many of you do not understand one very clear prove that buying older players for large amounts of money guarantees nothing, except injuries and problems... Not only in NFL. In every other sports. The very fresh example is in soccer where one team (PSG from Paris - soccer) paid €=360 mil ($ 435 mil) for 2 players plus their salaries just to see they where able just to repeat last season weak result... There is no guarantee...
vj_ostrowski
May 07, 2018 at 02:17 pm
"But if you’re the Packers, what the heck are you waiting for? The longer you wait, the more the price is going to go up."
I'm always so incredibly baffled by the fans and writers who print this stuff as if they think the Packers brass doesn't know this