Which Young Packers Have Highest Upside at Each Position?

The Packers still have plenty of players striving to hit their potential in their formative NFL seasons.

The Packers have built a strong core roster in recent years, mostly through good drafting and successful development.

While some of the players from the post-Aaron-Rodgers Packers have now become fully fledged veterans, looking to receive their second contracts in the league, there are still plenty of young players trying to fulfill their potential.

Among players who have played two years or fewer in the NFL, here are the players I believe to have the highest upside at each position:

Quarterback - Taylor Elgersma

Elgersma was not drafted, and was not even signed by Green Bay in their initial wave of UDFA additions, instead coming in for a tryout during minicamp, before eventually joining the team.

The Canadian quarterback chose the Pacers over other options such as the Bills or going to the CFL, citing the culture in Green Bay as a key reason for putting his development in their hands.

Sean Clifford is the only other QB on the roster who has not played at least three seasons, and while he could be a serviceable backup, he turns 27 this summer and essentially is what he is.

Coaches know an NFL arm when they see one, and Elgersma’s natural arm strength makes him an attractive developmental quarterback, who could eventually become a long-term backup.

Running back - MarShawn Lloyd

Lloyd’s rookie year was disrupted by injury, as the former USC back took only six carries in his lone appearance in 2024.

He is an explosive back, with the potential to bring a dangerous change of pace from Josh Jacobs’ more thumping style.

Compared to the other young backs on the roster, such as Emanuel Wilson, Chris Brooks, Amar Johnson and Jalen White, Lloyd has higher end traits and ultimately the highest upside.

Wide receiver - Matthew Golden

With Christian Watson and Romeo Doubs not eligible as they enter their fourth NFL seasons, Golden gets the nod.

There is a legitimate argument for either Jayden Reed, Dontayvion Wicks or Savion Williams, three receivers with different intriguing skill sets, to be the choice here, and any of those three could end up being the best of this group.

However, by being the first receiver the Packers have selected in round one since 2002, Golden is by default the best receiver prospect the team has had since then.

He already has a well-rounded game, giving him a high floor, but the 4.29 speed shows his explosive upside to become an elite NFL receiver.

Tight end - Tucker Kraft

A year ago at this time, Luke Musgrave would probably have been the pick, and there is no doubt his rare speed at the tight end position still gives him real potential to break out, but through two seasons, it has not come together for the former second-round pick.

He has been unable to stay healthy, and Kraft, who is also a top tier athlete, has simply been the better, more complete player. Musgrave was always a projection coming out of college, and at this moment it seems unlikely he hits his ultimate upside.

Offensive line - Jordan Morgan

Another player whose rookie year was impacted by injury, Morgan looked potentially on course to win the right guard job over Sean Rhyan in his first season.

Anthony Belton is another candidate, but he is older than Morgan despite being drafted a year later, and does not have the same level of elite athleticism which should allow Morgan to become a long-term left tackle, giving the former first-round pick the higher value and upside.

Defensive line - Warren Brinson

There are not many options to choose from on the defensive line, a position most observers thought the Packers would address earlier in the NFL draft than the sixth round.

The defensive linemen flew off the board earlier than projected throughout the draft, and Green Bay ended up waiting to take Brinson, who is probably the highest upside player of their group of young players, over Karl Brooks, Colby Wooden and Nazir Stackhouse.

Brinson was not a full time player at Georgia due to the stacked defensive line group he consistently played in, but he flashed real potential as both a run defender and a pass rusher.

If he had transferred to another school and been ‘the guy’, he could have put up better numbers and probably been a higher draft pick. He may have to wait for opportunities in Green Bay, but it would not be surprising if Brinson is a better pro than college player.

EDGE - Lukas Van Ness

Van Ness’ first two seasons have not been what Packers fans hoped for when the team selected him with the 13th overall pick, but he has not been the disaster many people seem to think either.

He was arguably Green Bay’s most improved player in the back half of the season, is still young and has every athletic trait you could want in a pass rusher.

This year is massively important for him, but he has the highest upside of a group of young rushers who are likely to be career rotational or ‘number three’ EDGEs, such as Barryn Sorrell, Brenton Cox Jr., Collin Oliver and Arron Mosby.

Linebacker - Edgerrin Cooper

Cooper burst onto the scene as a rookie, getting better every week after dealing with injuries early on, and was possibly the team’s best overall defender in 2024.

He has put on weight this offseason in an attempt to hold up against the rigors of an NFL season, which should benefit him moving forward. Cooper displayed his electrifying potential as a rookie, and the sky's the limit for him.

Cornerback - Carrington Valentine

Valentine had a rough game in the Wild Card loss to the Eagles, but was coming along nicely in the back half of the season.

He has had some real highs in his two NFL seasons so far, has prototypical size and athleticism to be a starting outside corner, and is still only 23 years old. He certainly has more upside than the other young corners on the team; Kalen King, Kamal Hadden and Micah Robinson.

Safety - Javon Bullard

Of the three safeties Green Bay drafted in 2024, Evan Williams stole the headlines with some impressive early displays.

He played better football than Bullard overall, but the former Georgia defensive back does not get enough credit for the important role he played in the Packers defense. Being asked to move around as much as he did is not something usually trusted to a rookie, and Bullard survived.

Williams should be a solid starting free safety for a long time, but Bullard’s ability to play multiple spots in the secondary gives him the higher upside if he can settle in and develop after an unprecedented rookie year in terms of usage.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (25)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Oppy's picture

May 26, 2025 at 06:17 am

I think Kitan Oladapo will have a more productive career than Javon Bullard when all is said and done, though it may not happen with the Packers. I see long-haul upside and potential realized there. However, Evan Williams looks like the best young play-maker out of the group.

Same goes for Kalen King over Valentine.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 26, 2025 at 09:35 am

I most definitely agree with you about Williams. Another year playing next to X will keep him on the upside. He's so very intelligent and football smart. Plays like he knows the game, studies it, and loves it. For a rookie to play so solid was impressive and expect an even better season. Love Bullard's versatility but Williams is the better S.

I do agree with Mark about Valentine. He played well in the 2nd half of his sophomore season (did get schooled vs the Eagles in last game). Maybe King will step up this year like Valentine did last...we can hope.

And hope Alexander the Great who became Alexander the Occasional will resurface as Alexander the Reasonable. Will he agree to play for similar pay as long as he PLAYS on an incentivized rework? He knows he doesn't have to. And if he doesn't he may be gone and go shop his wares as a part time player who is motivated most by signing top guaranteed NFL money deals.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 26, 2025 at 11:22 am

King lacks speed. It’s really hard to be a good corner without that. Micah Hyde did manage it, though his best years were at safety. However, he also had elite recognition skills and good hands. King will have to match them to make much of an impact.

Valentine’s problem is not coverage. He actually rated over 70 last year according to pff, second only to Jaire and the only one close to him. His problem is his lack of physicality and technique as a tackler. As a pure cover corner he is starter grade, or was last year. Thats the hard part that usually weeds out the athletes from the football players.

The tackling is down to desire, not ability. If he has grasped that nettle this off season and worked on his technique, then I think he could become a default starter. That’s up to him, he is a far better athlete that has shown the ability to stick with receivers.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

May 26, 2025 at 12:17 pm

I said the same thing about outside CBs last week and then looked at a couple top 10 lists and the slowest outside player was Jaylen Johnson at a 4.5 40. That's in the 67th percentile among CBs and that includes slot corners. I'm sure you can find good outside corners that are slower than that but do you want to give them a 2nd contract when an injury or two could really give them trouble?

PFF just did a top 25 players under 25 and I wasn't surprised there were no Packers on it but they also did the 10 honorable mentions and no sign of Cooper or Kraft. Besides those two the Packers probably need to have two other young players take a step and be in the running for that list next year if the want to be one of the top 2-4 teams left in the playoffs.

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-ranking-top-25-players-under-25-2025-nfl-se...

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

May 26, 2025 at 07:24 am

I may be putting too much stock in the last half of last season, but Cox has shown more than Van Ness to date as an edge rusher. Cox appears faster off the edge and certainly has a couple of more moves than Van Ness's singular bull rush. I think Cox has a bigger 2025 season than Van Ness.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

May 26, 2025 at 08:35 am

LVN has better upside. Cox I suspect is at his ceiling now.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

May 26, 2025 at 09:43 am

Cox was actually the much higher rated athlete coming out of high school (five stars versus Van Ness's three stars). Cox's college career was derailed by immaturity, not lack of ability. I wouldn't evaluate Cox based solely on his UDFA draft status as he has more physical ability than many drafted higher, but he didn't play all that much in college due to off the field issues. I doubt he has reached his physical ceiling yet and he will improve with more experience as long as his head/ego don't betray him.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 26, 2025 at 10:05 am

I agree...Cox, Jr has the greater upside. I don't believe he is even close to his ceiling. He really only played during 2 seasons of college football and still is only 25 years old.

He was going to be the next Georgia superstar DL as one of the top rated HS DE in America and a Georgian to boot.

Then he messed his mess kit twice and displayed incredible immaturity towards teammates and coaches. Bad attitude resulted in poor behavior and dismissal. To get booted off both Georgia and Florida football teams is quite the badge of stupidity.

The Packers FA "flyer" has paid off so far. Like LVN, I don't believe he learned much from the two years being coached by Ribrovich. Has Hafley has reached him about the fork in his career road...a NFL successful NFL career or a puff of smoke that was his last chance? Hope so.

Last season it was easy to notice Cox Jr when on the field...LVN too often was invisible getting too easily controlled with his signature and only move...the bull rush.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

May 26, 2025 at 12:00 pm

Cox hasn't had a hint of trouble in two years in Green Bay, so I am hoping getting booted from two SEC programs and going undrafted by the NFL was a sufficient wake up call to motivate him. If Cox truly has realized that it wasn't them, but it was him who was the problem then the Packers may have found a gift on the same order as Sam Shields.

I think the new DL coach will benefit both Cox and LVN and if Cox has truly matured, he could be a force.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 26, 2025 at 11:33 am

Cox tested surprisingly badly. That played as much of a factor in him going undrafted as his history did. It also governs how many pigeonhole him in terms of potential. Personally, what I’ve seen of him on field suggests that his testing isn’t all that indicative of his true athleticism. Therefore I’m not sure if he’s near to maximizing his potential or just starting to display it.

He was better than most of the other DEs not only in pressures per snap, but in the run game, which was also a surprise. It was an impressive few games last year. He’s a player I’m looking forward to seeing more of this summer. Was it a deceptive flash or the result of a guy with talent who has gained focus?

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

May 26, 2025 at 08:09 pm

I would agree...but GB Coaches generally are " WAY BEHIND" what everyone else can see on the field when it comes to playing time. Maybe Haffley is much better and looks at all positions he has total responsibility of and reviews film instead of just talking to his people.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

May 26, 2025 at 08:35 am

LVN was drafted for his upside and probably came out of college too soon. Might have staid with the NIL money that is there now. I have been critical of him as well but he has time to turn it around. IMO he is the X factor for the defense. If he comes around the D could be very good, if not they will struggle vs good passers.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 26, 2025 at 09:34 am

I spent some time and energy considering each of Mark's choices, and I was disappointed that I couldn't come up with a better option for any of them. :-D
Well done Mark!

0 points
0
0
HawkPacker's picture

May 26, 2025 at 10:00 am

I would have gone with Williams over Bullard. I was a bit disappointed with Bullard. The author states that he can play many positions on defense but what I saw was that he did not play any of the positions great! Being an earlier pick than Williams I believed he would wow us much like Cooper did at linebacker.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 26, 2025 at 10:18 am

When Bullard had to replace the injured Williams last season, there was a noticeable drop off at S. X and Williams could be one of the top S duos in the NFL this season.

S room is loaded with young talent.

0 points
0
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 26, 2025 at 02:27 pm

You’re right!
Thank god, I don’t have to completely agree with the article!
I think I didn’t see Evan Williams because I’m a HUGE fan of his, and my subconscious didn’t want me playing favorites.
I think another factor is that we/I tend to think of “potential “ in terms of “physical ceiling,” but in Williams case, it is more of a “mental ceiling.” I think he has some Harrison Smith vibes.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

May 26, 2025 at 02:52 pm

Wasn't Bullard playing hurt toward the end of the season? I'm thinking this may have had something to do with him struggling at safety when Williams got hurt. Also, there was an article on Packerswire the other day about Bullard's worst games happening when he had to switch positions, but he would bounce back the following week. They said he played better overall than most people think he did.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

May 26, 2025 at 09:39 am

These are the players who are the most effective--McKinney, Jacobs, Kraft, Williams, Cooper, Tom.

The Safety and RB room are good-the rest have many weaknesses, esp. CB and DL (there have been a few additions to both but not significant enough)

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 26, 2025 at 11:08 am

A comprehensive list of young players - with others that could be added. So this is a good position to be in - especially given the player attrition rates during the regular season. Even the D-line looks a lot better than the days of Dean Lowry, Kingsley KeKe, Jack Heflin and Tyler Lancaster - which was not that long ago. The Packers youth will be important to their SB run this year.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

May 26, 2025 at 12:21 pm

It seemed like the SPAM had slowed a little but it's as bad as ever today. They need to have a way to flag and block them or it's just going to get worse.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 26, 2025 at 01:55 pm

Bullard is our de facto nickel guy, and in 15 games he got in on 90 tackles, over half of them solo. He's a tackler. He's that "hybrid defender" we've wanted forvever...a guy who could cover like a safety and tackle like a linebacker.

And that makes Williams our de facto safety opposite of McKinney.

In the last year, we've added substantial talent to the defense: McKinney in FA, Cooper and Hopper and Williams and Bullard in the draft. That's six guys, five of whom were pretty good defenders for us. If any of the FAs or draft picks we've picked up make the team....which will almost certainly happen....then that's a pretty substantial overhaul .

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 26, 2025 at 03:08 pm

56 all day, (Green) Bay Bay!!!

0 points
0
0
NoNonsense's picture

May 27, 2025 at 11:53 am

Dontayvion Wicks has as much upside as anyone on offense. He may not be able to achieve what Devante Adams did in his 3rd yr with all the mouths to feed but he has that potential.

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

May 27, 2025 at 11:57 am

Wicks only has upside if he stops dropping balls.

0 points
0
0
NoNonsense's picture

May 27, 2025 at 04:16 pm

He just needs to cut way down on the drops, everyone has then from time to time, including some of the greatest of all time.

0 points
0
0