What Does Aaron Jones' Pay Cut Mean for AJ Dillon?
Will both Jones and Dillon be on Green Bay's roster in 2024?
By markoldacres

Earlier this week, Green Bay’s star running back, Aaron Jones agreed to a pay cut. This, along with a contract restructure initiated by the Packers, ensured Jones will stay in the fold this season, and likely in 2024 too.
While the contract adjustments have lowered Jones’ cap hit to around $8m in 2023, that figure will boom to $17m next year. If the Packers cut Jones loose in 2024, they would incur more than $12m in dead cap.
So, Jones appears to be here to stay, but what does all this mean for his running mate, AJ Dillon?
Dillon is set to become a free agent after the 2023 season and would likely garner significant interest from other teams who may see the former 2nd round pick as a lead back.
In the last two seasons, Dillon has rushed for a total of 1,573 yards at an average of 4.2 yards per carry and has also found the end zone 12 times.
He has been productive when given the opportunity and provides a vital, differing skill set from Jones. Dillon has also embraced everything it means to be a Green Bay Packer and ingrained himself in the community, becoming a fan favourite in the process.
However, it is fair to question whether the Packers should hand out a lucrative contract to keep him beyond this year.
As long Jones is in Green Bay, he’s going to be the headline act in the backfield, and rightfully so.
There is a widely subscribed school of thought that it is not prudent from a roster building standpoint to pay running backs big money.
It therefore goes without saying that paying two backs would not be considered best practice.
This year’s draft class is absolutely loaded at the position, so the Packers will have ample opportunity to find their next generation of running backs.
Tyler Goodson is also on the roster and flashed his electric potential during pre-season games last year, before spending the 2022 season on Green Bay’s practice squad.
While handing Dillon a second contract may not be the logical move, Packers GM Brian Gutekunst spent a premium draft pick on him and would likely be reluctant to let him walk out the door.
It would not be at all surprising to see Jones and Dillon leading Green Bay’s rushing attack in 2024, and if Gutekunst decides to give Dillon the bag, few Packer fans will complain.
But with a year remaining on his rookie deal, the Packers have a difficult decision to make.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres
__________________________




Comments (81)
croatpackfan
February 19, 2023 at 06:38 am
Well, I suppose if Aaron Jones will retire after 2024, it would be wise to keep AJ Dillon on the roster. As "veteran" RB who can help speed development of the drafted rookies or young UDFA. I'm sure that AJ Dillon contract can be worked out in the manner that cap hit would not be high while A Joned is still on roster.
On the other hand, I agree that it is not fiseable to have 2 RBs with relatively high salaries.
Since'61
February 19, 2023 at 06:48 am
Let's see how 2023 plays out before we start working on the 2024 roster. A lot can happen between now and the end of the 2023 season. Thanks. Since '61
NickPerry
February 19, 2023 at 07:24 am
The voice of reason...Thanks Since '61.
Since'61
February 19, 2023 at 07:46 am
Nick I try to take it one game at a time never mind one season at a time. The Packers aren't close to being ready for 2023 never mind 2024. Stay well. Thanks, Since '61
Coldworld
February 19, 2023 at 07:55 am
There’s not much to write about till the levee breaks …
MainePackFan
February 19, 2023 at 08:58 am
As always :)
tincada
February 19, 2023 at 01:58 pm
So you're waiting for a mid NFC N finish and then what? AR strings the 3 stooges out again for another $40 Mil next year?
Bitternotsour
February 19, 2023 at 02:00 pm
What it immediately means is the backfield is unchanged for 2023, and that the cap hit is a little more friendly.
dobber
February 19, 2023 at 06:53 am
With the relatively short-term nature of Jones' deal, it would be easy to structure a deal for Dillon--if he earns it--that would keep the big hits from happening at the same time.
Coldworld
February 19, 2023 at 08:06 am
We need to use Dillon as the back he was drafted to be. Out of the shotgun regularly he is miscast. He’s another example of a type LaFleur wanted but then isn’t employed in the way anticipated. Not as overlooked or quite as miscast as Deguara, but a similar and significant issue. Most roads lead back to LaFleur.
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 08:24 am
Why have a power back without a power running game?
PackyCheese500
February 19, 2023 at 08:53 am
Ask MLF
murf7777
February 19, 2023 at 08:51 am
Dobber, as much as I really like Jones, there was no need to keep him, especially if the plans are to trade Love. All you have to do is look at the last 10-12 SB winners and how much they paid their top RB. The highest is 2M for that season. The lowest was the Packers with Stark at 325K. RB’s are a dime a dozen. I think you would agree, Dillon is just another back in the league, nothing special. Now, if they keep Rodgers, I can understand keeping this special weapon, but even then it was questionable. I wasn’t in favor of them paying Jones his second contract. Other than McCaffrey (more of a pass catcher)I wouldn’t pay for almost any RB’s second contract.
If I was a top 300 athletic player in HS I’d do anything possible to change position if I was at RB. They are and will continue to be for the foreseeable future, the lowest paid position (when taking into consideration amount paid over career), with the lowest length of career in the NFL. Of course, that is taking out the kickers into consideration.
EnemyTerritory
February 19, 2023 at 01:29 pm
Restructuring Jones was the smart thing to do. He is the heart of the GB offense whether running the LaFlower plan or the Diva plan. He is both RB1 and WR2. True RBs are devalued but he is a mismatch on the field. Especially for an offensively challenged team wit no real TE threats and an underwhelming WR room under contract.
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 02:50 pm
They have to change up some of his route schemes in the passing game. He is getting CB or safety coverage on the wheel routes and it is a bit predictable. Hopefully, the TE deficiency will be remedied via the draft?
murf7777
February 19, 2023 at 02:55 pm
A lot of RB’s are mismatches. How do you dispute the fact that the last 12 SB winning RB’s were paid no higher than 2M per year? Jone’s contract $’s could be spent on the OL & TE that in itself will create better RB’s. I like Jones, but managing a Team with a hard cap is difficult. If the last 12 SB winning teams didn’t spend it on a RB then I think that is an important trend that a wise GM would take note of.
None of that is a hit against Jones, it’s a hit against the value of the position and how much you should spend on it.
LambeauPlain
February 19, 2023 at 07:23 am
Quite the feat AJ is now in the company of Jim Taylor and Ahman Green as top RBs in Packer history.
If Love gets the ball next season (and I hope he does), AJ can greatly help lower the pressure on his new QB with his diverse skillset. With Love, Jones will probably be even more productive next season if both stay on the field. Win win for both men.
murf7777
February 19, 2023 at 08:57 am
If the Packers trade Rodgers, I’d trade Jones and other valuable vets, get as many draft picks, go younger and develop for the future. I’d do what Miami and Houston are doing. The reason is very, very few QB’s do well in year one so why keep the aging vets when you can get draft capital and lower the salary cap and build for the future.
Time for a rebuild, if Packers trade Rodgers you can forget about the playoffs in 2023 and probably 2024.
stockholder
February 19, 2023 at 07:24 am
It means he'll probably leave like Jamal Williams.
Jamal Williams- now a Detroit Lion.
had 500 carries, never fumbled. Abt 2000 yds (4 yrs)
AJ Dillion- 419 carries, abt. 1800 yds (3 yrs) 0 fumbles lost.
He never was a 100 yd rusher from what I saw.
Which is a major achievement in Rushing stats.
The other downer is; Williams & Jones were drafted later.
Hindsight tells you a lot.
Dillion isn't what we imagined he would be.
The packers are still struggling on; 3rd and one to go.
And as both RBs age.
It might be best;
to draft a new RB who will be a game breaker.
I say draft Robinson @15 if you can.
Coldworld
February 19, 2023 at 07:57 am
Would you have kept Jones or Williams? That was effectively the choice.
stockholder
February 19, 2023 at 08:16 am
Jones. - But I wouldn't have drafted Dillion.
I understood it. But I saw better choices.
mrtundra
February 19, 2023 at 08:29 am
From what I've read, the Packers have been watching Dillon, since he was in high school. They wanted him, badly. There's no way they will let him go. I think it was a well spent pick. We, as a team, need to RTFB a lot more often than we did, this past season. If Love is our QB, we may just do that--and from under Center, too! Dillon can wear down defenses, late in the game, as he pounds the ball to move the chains, or get into the end zone. I wouldn't blame Gute if he drafted another RB, for this team, even with a capable back up, in Patrick Taylor, on the sideline. RTFB and GO PACK, GO!!!
Coach Cleve Steamer
February 19, 2023 at 01:48 pm
Dillon is not a pounder. He is a plower. His first step is slow and strong but he goes down like anyone if hands are on him in the backfield or at the line of scrimmage. He is very good once there’s a push by the line, that’s when he grinds the yards. He’s steady, catches the ball well, but he’s never going to be spectacular.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
February 19, 2023 at 01:54 pm
His first step is slow because he mostly gets the ball out of shotgun where he often has to slow down at the mesh point. What sense does it make to call plays that involve making a 250 pound guy slow down before getting the ball? His burst looks just fine when he gets the ball under center.
4thand10
February 19, 2023 at 03:01 pm
I actually would preferably like to see another RB drafted. I like the idea of a triple threat at that position.
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 08:32 am
I liked Willie Gay for that spot or Logan Wilson. They needed the ILB. Get a veteran RB in free agency. I liked Dillon at BC, but he seems to have regressed.(scheme?). The 2020 set up was changed with Love's selection and giving up a four.
13TimeChamps
February 19, 2023 at 09:12 am
After a slow start to the season, he did seem to come on stronger later in the year IIRC.
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 11:21 am
A.Jones was on the bench more nursing his injuries and he received More carries. He may be a guy that needs to be fed the ball with the frequency to get his rhythm? He should work on his flexibility and get his footwork back on track. It will be his show-me year. He will need good Film to make more money.
Coldworld
February 19, 2023 at 02:10 pm
The respective figures (on the ground) really are not that different given type and opportunity. The disparity is most striking in the passing game
Jones;
171 carries, 799 rushing yards, 4.7 yards per carry, 52 receptions on 65 targets, 391 receiving yards, 10 total TDs
Dillon;
187 carries, 803 rushing yards, 4.3 yards per carry, 34 receptions on 37 targets, 313 receiving yards, 7 total TDs.
murf7777
February 19, 2023 at 09:13 am
I wasn’t in favor of spending that much SC $’s on Jones.(I was down voted quite a bit for taking that position). Doesn’t mean I didn’t like him. I would’ve kept Williams to a much lower amount. I wouldn’t sign any RB to a large 2nd contract, unless they are a dynamic pass catcher and runner like McCaffrey. It’s the easiest production to replace. Rookies, even 4-7 round draft picks, come in a do well in year one. Also, easy to find Vets at a low price. Past 12 SB winners didn’t pay much for their RB’s.
13TimeChamps
February 19, 2023 at 09:47 am
McCaffrey had 5 receiving touchdowns last year, Jones had 6. Over the past two years, Jones has 111 receptions and 11 receiving touchdowns. I don't know if that would be considered dynamic, but I'm guessing not many RB's have exceeded those numbers. I've always felt he hasn't gotten enough credit for his receiving skills out of the backfield.
murf7777
February 19, 2023 at 10:02 am
Hey 13, do you really think a healthy Jones is comparable to a healthy McCaffrey? Well catching TD’s are one stat. McCaffrey had 85 rec for 741 yards for 8.7 ypc. Jones 59 rec for 395 for 6.7 ypc. McCaffrey also had 8 rushing TD’s to Jones’s 2. So it was 7 compared to 13 total TD’s.
Jones also fumbled the ball 5 times and a couple at crucial times during the game compared to McCaffrey’s 1 time. Jones is still a very, very good back, but is replaceable for the money you have to pay to keep him.
13TimeChamps
February 19, 2023 at 10:24 am
McCaffrey is probably the best dual threat running back in the league when healthy. My point was only that Jones isn't a "dime a dozen" type running back. I feel he is also one of the better dual threat RB's in the league, as well as pass pro, so I'm not sure he's as replaceable as you might think.
The fumbles are certainly a concern. Hopefully he can get that figured out.
Coldworld
February 19, 2023 at 02:06 pm
I agree, but 10 games in two years raises real questions now.
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 11:30 am
The flanker/wingback looks to be HIS best role. I would bring in a guy(s) rd 3-5 to be a solid plugger. The upcoming draft is a RB and TE year for depth. Taylor should be given a chance. He may have lost some of his Memphis speed with his knee surgery?
13TimeChamps
February 19, 2023 at 09:05 am
Just once before I die I'd like to see you spell the man's name correctly. It's Dillon, not Dillion. He's been on the team 3 years now.
croatpackfan
February 19, 2023 at 11:40 am
13TC. You can not expect from staleholder, pardon stockholder, to spell players names correctly. He is in deep love with ACR, still spell his name like Arron.
Do not expect much from him.
stockholder
February 19, 2023 at 01:17 pm
Are you a English teacher?
Writer? editor?
I'll try to hit the right keys for you.
13TimeChamps
February 19, 2023 at 01:25 pm
Nope, none of the above. And I normally couldn't care less about spelling errors on sites like this.
But I think it's a bit disrespectful to the players to continually spell their names wrong. Arron? Dillion?
For someone who claims to be such a huge fan, it doesn't seem like much of an effort on your part to spell their names right.
stockholder
February 19, 2023 at 01:47 pm
The spell checker isn't working.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
February 19, 2023 at 01:57 pm
an*
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 03:01 pm
LOL
LLCHESTY
February 19, 2023 at 03:58 pm
I feel like spelling is the least wrong with his comments. Get him to work on structure 1st!
NickPerry
February 19, 2023 at 07:48 am
I'm on the same side of the fence as Since '61. I'd wait and see what happens with Jones and 2023 before even thinking about an extension. I may be wrong but if Rodgers isn't gone this year (2023 season) and comes back, aren't cap ramifications even worse in 2024?
Whatever the case is I'd like to see Dillon beyond 2023. If Love is the QB then I see we see more of Dillon getting the handoff from Love under center. I think that makes a big difference when it comes to Dillon and his success as a ballcarrier. IMO he's just so much better with the QB under center.
GOD, I hope McGinn is right!
stockholder
February 19, 2023 at 08:21 am
McGinn is Fake News.
The Packers will keep their word.
Dillion will leave like Lazard.
And drafting a FB is my Choice instead.
Coldworld
February 19, 2023 at 08:44 am
Silverstein is reporting that Gute wanted to move on from Rodgers last season (though whether then or after isn’t clear). Again, not first hand but it does seem like there is some smoke here.
Tom Silverstein of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: “At one point late last year, Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst told an NFL colleague he was convinced it was time the organization move on from quarterback Aaron Rodgers and see what Jordan Love had in him.”
If accurate, and that has to be a question mark with any such hearsay, my respect for Gute increases dramatically and the role of Murphy is starkly clarified.
PackyCheese500
February 19, 2023 at 08:51 am
actually, the article said that MLF made the choice to stick with Rodgers. Maybe MM is less involved than we thought? I don’t know. We do know that MLF is not a very good HC even more, now
Coldworld
February 19, 2023 at 08:58 am
If Gute was ready (and the article makes it clear Silverstein doesn’t know if he meant after the season) then do you really think LaFleur made that decision, either under the Packers structure where Murphy arbitrates in the event that they disagree, or based upon what we have seen of LaFleur’s personality?
Guam
February 19, 2023 at 08:52 am
Certainly confirms what many here have suspected about the Rodgers signing.
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 11:36 am
Love was HIS pick. He has to defend it.
croatpackfan
February 19, 2023 at 11:58 am
Coldword, what do you think, why Mark "we are not idiots" Murphy announce MLF hire, return of ACR in 2021 and that huge contract last year. My guess is because Brian Gutekunst did not agree with all those decisions.
I also believe that 2022 season was presented to Mark "we are not idiots" Murphy with clear analyses about QB playing. MM was football player, so it is not possible to not see all the mistakes made by ACR. I'm not talking about bad throws, I'm talking about decisions he made at snaps he played. Just last game vs Detroit is full of bad decision from allagedly great QB. With this I'm not saying that ACR was not great QB before 2017/2018, he was. But after he got Mike McCarthy fired and retiring TT, he outcome his true personality. And that is the reason why he was not able to go over the postseason bump.
Brian Gutekunst show us, as you already noticed, that he is not all in on the idea to keep ACR by his drafting. His drafts were developmental, not for immediate result.
MHO.
LLCHESTY
February 19, 2023 at 04:02 pm
Mitchy over at Acme won't like hearing that. But he'll probably just sat it's untrue and move on.
mrtundra
February 19, 2023 at 08:30 am
On the money, NP.
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 08:39 am
This is a good draft for RBs. Get one or two of these guys. A.Jones is always a hit away from the sick bay. 3-4 guys match his profile in the draft and there are guys in the 5'-10/6'-0 and 220 lb range that are ground and pound guys. I would not be satisfied with the RB room as it stands. Bring in competition. Get Better.
OK Hunter Leupke from ND State as the Rhino. Stockholder may be right with him.
croatpackfan
February 19, 2023 at 12:43 pm
"GOD, I hope McGinn is right!"
Nick, please look at this, it is little bit long, but there is analyses abou last game vs Detroit, both on O and D.
https://www.youtube.com/live/BZaxDm2oN0E?feature=share
It is free and everyone can watch if you want to see whoplayed how in season finale vs Detroit.
PatrickGB
February 19, 2023 at 08:24 am
As a second round pick, I find Dillon to be a bit disappointing. Don’t get me wrong, I love the guy as a person. I remain a fan. But, given his draft position, I thought he would be more like a Lacy. Perhaps it’s the lines fault or the play calling but I don’t think that he runs over people like I expected he would given his size. I see too many RB’s drafted later that are just as dynamic. I am all for keeping “The Mayor” but not for the big bucks. Too much hype over the size of his legs led me to believe that he would be a steamroller. And he can do that over DB’s but he seldom gets to that level because he gets stopped at the line. He doesn’t have speed or elusiveness so power is his only option and other teams know that.
mrtundra
February 19, 2023 at 08:34 am
IMO, Dillon was not used "effectively" with Rodgers as QB. Rodgers used the shotgun formation on running plays, where Dillon seems to be better with the QB under Center, on run plays. Love, if he is our QB, will most likely be under center when he hands off the ball to Jones or Dillon. Pound the rock! GO PACK, GO!!!
murf7777
February 19, 2023 at 09:06 am
Patrick, as a wannabe GM, no not really, it’s a thankless position to have. But, if I were, I’d never take a RB in the first 3 rounds. As you stated, far too many good RB’s in rounds 4-7.
HarryHodag
February 19, 2023 at 08:27 am
My deep suspicion is the Packers will look for a replacement back for Dillon via the draft this year.
As I've said before I like Aaron Jones as a player and a citizen. But "The Turk" of fiscal responsibility will hit the Packers if they keep kicking things down the road if it hasn't already.
Jones' injury past has me concerned as he gets older.
The team could have cut Jones and they would have been out about $9.5 mill but saved $10 mill. Now they will be hanging with him(and his dead cap) for at least one more year. I understand the merits of his many talents to the team but this is the one position where you can find a good running back on the cheap. Robinson from Texas has been compared to Barkley from the Giants by scouts. With Jones gone and Robinson in you would have a potential great back paired with Dillon, to the point you could keep Dillon next year. Of course the draft is a crap shoot and who knows what will happen. But there are other backs almost as good this year. My fear is Gute thinks this team can win the Super Bowl. Can it? I don't think so. Tearing it down guarantees another losing season, but long term it would be back with an infusion of talent.
I know this bucks the trend of the Jones re-signing but there are times you need to consider it all.
PackyCheese500
February 19, 2023 at 08:50 am
I think they’ll be extending Dillon and cutting Jones in 2024, personally. He will be 29.
MainePackFan
February 19, 2023 at 09:18 am
"The team could have cut Jones and they would have been out about $9.5 mill but saved $10 mill"
Harry, it's a moot point, but I'm curious to know where you saw this ?
Spotrac has it listed as a $19.6M dead cap hit if they had cut him.
murf7777
February 19, 2023 at 09:21 am
You had me till you wanted to draft Robinson. So, what has Barkley done for NYG regarding success in playoffs? No much. Production from RB’s can be had much lower in the draft. Use your high draft pick on a great OL and that will make any RB better.
PackyCheese500
February 19, 2023 at 08:49 am
Personally, I will say that I wanted the FO to cut Jones for cap reasons, and because we couldn’t afford to restructure more dollars into the future. However, I will be the first to o admit that what Jones did in taking a pay cut (along with a partial restructure) was a selfless and noble act. We need more team players like Jones who are willing to sacrifice for the team. Glad to have him back.
murf7777
February 19, 2023 at 09:25 am
Come on’ man…..Jones didn’t have a choice. The Packers were going to cut him if he didn’t. Do you really think he was going to get a better contract elsewhere? His Agent was savvy in getting the Packers to do what they did. I Love Jones as a person, he’s a darn good back, but you can get that production at a far lessor price tag. RB’s are a devalued position in today’s NFL. McCaffrey is an exception, but that’s because mainly he’s a pass catcher. Do you think Dallas regrets signing Zeke to the big second contract?
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 12:15 pm
This portion of the deal was contained in the language of his first extension. He would have needed an ALL PRO year to justify any more of a payout. Remember, most of the NFL front office people would be working as used car dealers if they didn't get the inside track to a football profession.
tincada
February 19, 2023 at 01:54 pm
We need more team players like Jones . You mean like AR. NOT. LMAO dreamer.
PackyCheese500
February 19, 2023 at 04:25 pm
If you haven't noticed, I think the Packers should trade Rodgers, ideally to the Jets
LeotisHarris
February 19, 2023 at 09:08 am
There's much to be said for keeping your head and your feet in the same place. It's a challenge for me to be in the moment even when I accept we're all day-to-day. What does Aaron Jones pay cut that wasn't a pay cut mean for anyone?
NDP
February 19, 2023 at 09:11 am
As it concerns the fate of AJ Dillon, I want to celebrate that Aaron Jones and Dillon will be together for one more year. Organizations need to look ahead, but staying focused on the upcoming season is also beneficial. I'm unsure how many questions about this season or the next one can be answered until Aaron Rodgers leaves the darkness. I credit the organization for restructuring the contract of Aaron Jones while plans about how to move forward with Aaron Rodgers and other players remain significant concerns.
Swisch
February 19, 2023 at 10:47 am
It's astounding how much different is the future of the Packers if Love is the quarterback this upcoming season instead of Rodgers.
At least that's my impression, and it seems worthy of good discussion.
As an example, the question of quarterback would seem to make a huge difference as to how Dillon is used next season, and would seem to be a huge factor in the decision as to whether to keep Dillon thereafter.
I think most of us here at CHTV are wondering how Dillon would do with Love at QB, in an offense that presumably would be more determined by our head coach, Matt LaFleur, without the influence/interference of Rodgers.
***
If such considerations are on point, it's staggering how much power the front office has given to Rodgers to leave us twisting in the wind as to whether he wants to stay with the Packers or not.
It's embarrassing to the Packers as a franchise to cede its dignity to the arrogant and domineering and aloof Rodgers -- and extremely trying as a fan to watch it play out ever so slowly and painfully.
***
Another topic of discussion would be how this upcoming draft for the Packers would change depending on whether it's Rodgers and Love at QB.
I think Aaron Jones is a great keep for the Packers regardless of the QB; but the draft, as well as decisions on our veterans and those from other teams, may be quite a different story depending on the QB.
BirdDogUni
February 19, 2023 at 10:59 am
Anyone else feel these stories being leaked by McGinn and Silverstein are in bad form?
When AR12 comes out of the darkness to be briefed on these so-called stories, it will just piss him off. Poor taste and exactly the wrong thing to do. All the team had to do was tell Aaron they want to go younger. He set it up for them on a tee, like tee ball, and they still can't do the right thing.
I hope I'm wrong, but I feel like the Packers are going to screw this up no matter what they do.
BruceC1960
February 19, 2023 at 11:09 am
Seems like career suicide if these guys leaked insider info that weakens trade process.
stockholder
February 19, 2023 at 01:27 pm
There is a divide in the Force.
jannesbjornson
February 19, 2023 at 04:00 pm
Well, the Bartender @ The Stadium View Bar retired, so his inside guy may be feeding Wolf and he is playing the psy-ops game. He was in Air Force Intelligence, so he claims.
tincada
February 19, 2023 at 01:29 pm
AR doesn't give a damn. It's all about him.
beerandbrats
February 19, 2023 at 03:23 pm
Report: Packers are “disgusted with” Aaron Rodgers, they’re “done with him”
Good comments BDU because this could get ugly pretty fast! Write it up CHTV. Let's have that discussion!
coolhand
February 20, 2023 at 11:48 am
I was on facebook today and saw this story and also one that said ACR and the Packers are happy and will be together again in 2023. So much click bait stuff online these days.
jont
February 19, 2023 at 04:03 pm
"Anyone else feel these stories being leaked by McGinn and Silverstein are in bad form?'
I guess I do, though we're all very usd to this sort of thing. I do wonder about one thing: several here criticize Rodgers for playing the media, and I wonder if they think the FO is equally wrong to do the same thing.
Leatherhead
February 20, 2023 at 01:54 am
BDU.,…if I’m correct, he’s heard this before he went dark.
Perfection. The Packers use McGinn to send a message to every body that the Packers are disgusted and moving on. Rodgers can ponder that in the dark.
He has no cards left. He can retire, or he can play for the team we trade him to. It’s better for the Packers if he doesn’t retire, so they’ll try to work out a deal with a team he likes.
It’s over. He is done in Green Bay. I thought there’d be a lot of discussion on that here.
tincada
February 19, 2023 at 01:27 pm
They both get haircuts.
4thand10
February 19, 2023 at 02:57 pm
Fall of 2023 Dillion will be entering his 4th season. They don’t have do anything yet except provide camp competition. At least this coming FB season. and the following year they can exercise the 5th yr option.