Training Camp Matters for These 5 Packers

These five players have plenty at stake entering training camp and the preseason.

Sean Clifford

Clifford’s performances last training camp and preseason made the Packers look smarter for drafting him in the fifth round than many initially gave them credit for, as the former Penn State signal-caller looked at home and fit in seamlessly to his backup role.

As a rookie, he had no serious competition for the QB2 position, but that is not the case this year. Green Bay selected Michael Pratt in the seventh round of the 2024 NFL Draft, and while he may have been drafted in a later round, Pratt has more raw talent and ability than Clifford.

Pratt seems a strong favorite to make the roster, so it is up to Clifford to show he is still worthy of a spot on the team and force GM Brian Gutekunst’s hand to keep three quarterbacks instead of two. A strong preseason will be key to that.

Eric Stokes

Entering a contract year after an horrific couple of injury-riddled seasons, Stokes needs to show the Packers, and the wider NFL, he is still the same player they drafted in the first round three years ago.

To do that, he will first need to win back his job as the starting cornerback opposite Jaire Alexander.

That will not be easy, as he attempts to overcome Carrington Valentine, who impressed as a rookie and earned rave reviews during OTAs and minicamp from head coach Matt LaFleur.

For his part, Stokes also received plenty of praise from the coaching staff about the mental and physical shape he is in during the offseason programme, so it is shaping up to be a must-watch battle between Stokes and Valentine this summer.

Anders Carlson

Carlson’s up and down rookie year prompted the Packers to bring in competition this offseason as they look to motivate the kicker to up his game in year two.

There were purple patches for Carlson throughout the season, but he left plenty to be desired in terms of consistency and reliability in big moments. His miss versus the 49ers in the NFC Divisional Round is still fresh in Packers fans’ minds.

It seems clear Green Bay is invested in Carlson and wants him to win the job over Greg Joseph, but kickers only have so long of a leash.

If he does not show tangible improvement this summer, Gutekunst’s patience may run out, and Carlson’s relationship with special teams coordinator Rich Bisaccia may not be enough to save him.

Royce Newman

A name which sends shudders down the spines of many Packers fans, Newman has earned a reputation for being the weak link on the offensive line during his time in Green Bay.

It is mostly deserved, as he far too often looks shaky when thrust into relief duty along the offensive line. Frankly, Newman has never managed to build the functional strength required to hold up consistently and not get bullied.

It is hard to call him a bust – Newman was only a fourth-round pick after all – but whether playing at tackle or guard, he has simply been a below average offensive linemen for his entire run with the Packers.

Newman enters this summer down to the last year of his contract, and due to the escalators applied to players who hit certain playing time markers, has a cap hit of $3.24million, which the Packers would surely like to shed if possible.

The problem is that Green Bay is light in terms of interior offensive line depth, and Newman is a known commodity as a backup guard. That means he still has a legitimate chance to earn a roster spot, although he will have to fight off some incoming rookies.

Anthony Johnson Jr

Speaking of incoming rookies, there are plenty of them at safety this year after Gutekunst spent three 2024 draft picks on the position.

Johnson Jr is the only returning player whom the Packers drafted previously, and therefore has an opportunity to compete for legitimate playing time opposite marquee free agent signing Xavier McKinney.

The NFL moves quickly though, and it might be now or never for Johnson Jr, given the pedigree of the competition he faces.

Javon Bullard, drafted in the second round this year, is of course the frontrunner to usurp Johnson Jr sooner or later and partner McKinney for the foreseeable future.

Evan Williams (fourth round) and Kitan Oladapo (fifth round) have also had more serious draft capital used on them, with Johnson Jr a seventh round selection back in 2023.

If Johnson Jr cannot grasp the opportunity in front of him this training camp and overcome at least a couple of the rookies, he could quickly fade into insignificance.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (22)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
T7Steve's picture

July 12, 2024 at 06:29 am

I'm really hoping training camp maters to all 90 players. Want someone pushing and competing for every job. I really hope Newman starts for the Bears this season and shouldn't count on this list.

Since the injury debacle the 49ers had in the playoffs, the NFL made the rule change about an emergency or 3rd QB. How does that work? Is he on the roster but doesn't count? Is it part of the 53 or is there 54 on game day? I think the other QBs or at least one becomes inactive if he's activated. Any way you look at it an NFL team would be crazy not to roster 3 QBs if the rules are making provisions for them aren't they?

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 12, 2024 at 11:57 am

The new rule is that there is no limit to how many times a team can elevate a QB from the practice squad on game day. This will make it easier for teams to have three QBs dressed and ready to play. They can do it all season long if they choose to do so, without ever needing to put that third QB on the 53-man roster. However, a QB who is on the practice squad can still be signed to another team's active roster, so if the Packers want to protect Clifford and Pratt, they will both need to be on the 53-man roster.

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

July 12, 2024 at 12:28 pm

Great take on soon to be departed Royce/Alfred Newman.
I was hoping he'd be wearing purple in 2024, but black or orange would look equally nice on him.
GPG

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

July 12, 2024 at 07:18 am

Not sure I understand Stokes on this list. Yes he has things to prove but barring a truly awful TC he will make the team. The only real question is will he be a starting CB or the first CB off the bench. I would put Brenton Cox or S. Toure on this list as guys needing a strong camp just to make the team. Both are talented players but face crowded position rooms with lots of other very talented players.

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

July 12, 2024 at 08:03 am

I think Stokes sees a lot of playing time. I feel Kalen King will show up in camp and will end up being Stokes's relief. If King surprises the coaches, with solid play, he may supplant Stokes, for a bit. I think Valentine could also see the field, but it will be in relief of Jaire. If Valentine shows up in camp, there could be a real battle in the CB room. This and the fact that we did not even mention Ballentine, Nixon, Rochell, Green and Gilbert. Depth is a nice problem to have.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

July 12, 2024 at 09:17 am

The new DC. scheme, and coaching staff will be a wild card here. We hope these guys all respond and make a jump, but some invariably won't fit or play well. Some guys will get hurt. In the end, we're crossing our fingers that the depth we envision--and that management is clearly counting on based on how they approached the draft--will materialize.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

July 12, 2024 at 08:19 am

We dress 5 CBs. Right now, that would include Alexander, Valentine, and Nixon, for sure.

If Stokes doesn’t have a good camp, the Packers may decide that Rochelle, Ballantine, and King all deserve a spot on the 53 more than Stokes, who won’t be here next year. I think Stokes is talented, but I also think he has to show it during traIning camp .

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

July 12, 2024 at 08:47 am

Don't you think the new more aggressive defense will be right up Stokes' alley? If nothing else defenders love being the aggressor rather than passive and the attitudes that creates makes all the difference.

We'll get slashed occasionally, but isn't that better than cuts by a thousand knifes?

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

July 12, 2024 at 09:14 am

I think Stokes is a good player, but he has to be on the field. He has missed 23 out of the last 34 regular season games, and he doesn't help us if he's not. If he can stay healthy throughout training camp, he'll probably get a roster spot, but if he doesn't, I could easily see a scenario where he's traded away or released.

The death by a thousand cuts stuff.........To me,it's points. I don't care if they're scored in the 1st quarter or the 4th, I don't care if they come from runs or passes, I don't care if it's a 10 play drive or a 3 play drive. How many points?

Last year, we surrendered 350. We've added some new starters and we hope to have Alexander back. I think it's reasonable to expect an improvement on 350, and if that's what we get, we can all be happy.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

July 12, 2024 at 12:58 pm

They probably won't play 6 games with shitty QBs like they did in 2023, 8 if you count Fields. Context is important, if they had played Stafford instead of a guy that got cut the next day and the Rams scored their season average they would have lost, not made the playoffs and finished 17th in scoring. it could be a better defense and still allow more points. I'd be happy if they did but were playing like a top 5 defense when there's snow on the ground.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

July 12, 2024 at 11:29 am

I think the only way Stokes gets surpassed by Ballentine, Rochelle or King is due to injury. I also think Stokes will love the new, more aggressive defensive scheme. The only fly in the ointment is injury - Stokes has had too many already and another one could end his career as a Packer.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

July 12, 2024 at 12:35 pm

Assume you feel similarly about Watson. The parallels are unquestionable. Size, speed, inability to stay healthy, some big game hiccups. Does Watson risk being cut? Arguably the Packers have more invested in Stokes than Watson, and the receiver room is much deeper.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

July 12, 2024 at 05:24 pm

Especially as Stokes is a sunk cost at this point. They'd save a whole $91 thousand by cutting him vs an over $3 million dead cap hit.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 12, 2024 at 12:04 pm

This is just a list of players for whom training camp matters a lot. Not all of them are in danger of getting cut. Stokes is virtually a lock for the 53-man roster, and Anthony Johnson will probably make it too. But both of them will be fighting for a position in the pecking order, and they have serious competition.

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

July 12, 2024 at 07:59 am

Royce Newman reminds me a lot of Don Barclay, another guy that sent shivers up my spine, whenever I saw him on the OL.

0 points
0
0
Slim11's picture

July 13, 2024 at 06:23 pm

IIRC, Barclay was a decent run blocker at RT. Newman had a decent rookie season. Unfortunately, that was his best and has gotten steadily worse. His play at RT was almost worthless.

0 points
0
0
HawkPacker's picture

July 12, 2024 at 08:35 am

It is hard for me to see anyway the Packers keep Newman. They will want to free up the CAP space.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

July 12, 2024 at 08:59 am

"Sean Clifford....Anders Carlson....Royce Newman"

Could any of them turn a corner and make a jump? Sure...especially Carlson where kickers tend to grow with time. But the term "replacement-level player" is exactly what it sounds like, and all three of these guys go into camp with that look.

"Stokes..."

I tend to agree: barring an injury or a camp trade, he's going to be on the 53. I don't see him playing his way off the roster in the preseason. I think he's an example where early career performance and draft position will generate some benefit of the doubt, at least early in the season. If he's not starting, he'll be early off the bench--and CB is a position that has a high attrition rate. If he stays healthy, he's going to play a lot in 2024. I'm also not sold on him being gone in 2025...sure, they didn't pick up his 5th year option, but they'd be foolish to let him go if he balls out.

"Johnson"

There are a lot of safety/LB snaps on STs that are up for grabs after letting some stalwarts walk. The Packers like many teams like to use S and LBs on STs...although the new KO rules might re-shape how teams set their coverages and what kinds of players they use. There's definitely a path to the 53 for Johnson.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

July 12, 2024 at 12:46 pm

If I were Johnson I'd be working on kicking off... Drafting 3 safeties, all of them with great tape is a message from the front office that they needed new blood and additional talent. There was an interesting article on the kick-off rules in SI this week. Worth a look.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 12, 2024 at 06:17 pm

The more I read about the kickoff rules, the more I think that teams will simply kick the ball into the end zone for a touchback on the 30-yard-line. It's only a five-yard difference from the previous rules, and it eliminates the risk of a runback.

I would be surprised if non-kickers will be kicking off. Any kickoff that hits the ground before reaching the 20-yard-line will be spotted at the 40-yard-line. I don't think non-kickers will get good enough to avoid having that happen frequently. It would be better to use your real kicker and boom it into the end zone. Let your opponent start on the 30-yard-line. No big deal.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

July 12, 2024 at 09:15 pm

my understanding is that it must be through the end zone, not land in. if it lands in the end zone it goes to the 40. I think the ideal will be kicking line drives right thru. not worrying about hang time.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

July 12, 2024 at 09:38 pm

Here's what I found in an article on CBS Sports:

"If a kick hits in the end zone and stays inbounds, it can be either returned or downed. If downed then touchback to the 30-yard line. Any kick that goes out of the back of the end zone (in the air or bounces), results in a touchback to the 30-yard line."

So it will be the 30-yard-line either way. That's why I think most teams will just kick it into the end zone. Maybe there will be some mavericks who will attempt line drives into the landing zone between the 20-yard-line and the goal line. I don't think that will be a very exciting play to watch anyway, as the returning team will have a hard time getting a long return on a kick like that. The average kick return in the XFL last season was 21.3 yards, and there was only one TD in a total of 40 games played. The NFL kick return average was 23.0 yards.

0 points
0
0