The Packers Should Extend Zach Tom's Contract As Soon As Possible
Zach Tom has done more than enough to prove the Packers should give him the bag.
Under NFLPA rules, prospects from the 2022 draft class are eligible for contract extensions this offseason. Green Bay’s 2022 draft class delivered starters at four different positions and played a crucial role in keeping the team competitive after Brian Gutekunst traded Aaron Rodgers to the New York Jets. However, Zach Tom is arguably the only player from that class who is a lock for an extension, though Rasheed Walker’s chances are pretty good as well.
As a rookie, Tom appeared in nine games and showcased his versatility across the offensive line. He played 295 snaps at left tackle, 96 at left guard, 64 at right tackle, and 14 at right guard. Despite shifting between multiple positions, he allowed only 12 pressures on 296 pass-blocking snaps, which was tied for the 14th-lowest among 164 offensive linemen who played at least 290 pass-blocking snaps.
Tom followed his rookie season with an even stronger performance in 2023. He played 1,064 snaps at right tackle and was one of 19 offensive tackles to log at least 650 pass-blocking snaps that year. Tom ranked second in fewest sacks and quarterback hits allowed and was fifth in lowest pressures allowed. Furthermore, he allowed just nine pressures in 125 pass-blocking snaps against elite pass rushers like former Defensive Player of the Year T.J. Watt, Aidan Hutchinson, and Cameron Jordan. Over 952 career pass-blocking snaps, Tom surrendered only three sacks and six quarterback hits, which is a crazy ratio, to say the least.
Jordan Love aside, there’s a strong argument that Zach Tom is the most important player on Green Bay’s offense. A clear example of his impact came during the Packers’ playoff loss to the San Francisco 49ers in the 2023-24 divisional round.
In Green Bay’s first six possessions, Love completed 15 of 22 passes for 168 yards, two touchdowns, and a 120.3 passer rating. Then, Tom went down with an injury. Over the final four drives without him, Love completed just 50% of his passes and threw two interceptions, finishing with a 16.7 passer rating. The 49ers generated significant pressure from the left side, and Tom’s absence was a major blow to Matt LaFleur’s offense.
In 2024, Zach Tom once again played right tackle full-time and delivered his best season yet. According to Pro Football Focus, he posted career-high grades in both pass blocking and run blocking. In fact, he became only the second Green Bay offensive tackle since 2006 to record pass-blocking and run-blocking grades above 80.0 in the same season—the first being David Bakhtiari in 2020.
Tom has established himself as a star right tackle, and his talent isn’t going unnoticed by his peers. When asked by ESPN’s Kevin Clark about the best offensive lineman he’s faced in the NFL, Houston Texans edge rusher and former Defensive Rookie of the Year Will Anderson chose Tom.
"Number 50, (Zach) Tom from Green Bay. He is legit," Anderson said. "He is like a quick setter, he punches really quick, and he has a really good step off the ball, like, kick off the ball. He's good, he's more on the leaner side, quick feet, explosive hands, can get back really well. I would say he's up there."
If you’ve read Mark Oldacres’ excellent piece on Green Bay’s draft philosophy, you know that Brian Gutekunst values versatile offensive linemen. Zach Tom embodies that philosophy, having played all five positions on the offensive line. When you combine that versatility with his elite play at right tackle, it only makes sense for the Packers to get a deal done sooner rather than later.
According to Spotrac,Tom is slated to make $3,214,000 next season before becoming an unrestricted free agent at the end of the 2025 season. Green Bay could let him play out the final year of his rookie deal and negotiate an extension just before the start of free agency in 2026. However, there’s no evidence suggesting a regression is imminent for him. If anything, his play continues to trend upward, which means his price will only increase.
With the salary cap growing each year, the market inflation for player contracts continues to rise, driving every NFL agent to get the best possible deal for their clients. By negotiating an early extension, the Packers can anticipate these trends and lock up their star tackle for the foreseeable future, securing his services before his price increases even further. An early contract extension would also allow Green Bay to move on and potentially secure another extension, such as Rasheed Walker’s, in the near future.
I believe there's no question that a deal will get done—it’s just a matter of when. You just don’t see NFL franchises let many of those big boys up front hit the open market. Tom is a star tackle who also provides valuable flexibility in case the Packers ever need to move him around. Letting him hit free agency would be one of the worst decisions of Brian Gutekunst's tenure, and it's highly unlikely to happen.
Green Bay has a knack for finding offensive line gems in the later rounds, and Tom is a prime example of how effective that philosophy has been. His success reinforces the Packers’ ability to develop mid-round talent into high-level starters, and securing his future in Green Bay should be a top priority.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Felipe is a Brazilian Packers writer covering the #GoPackGo for CheeseheadTV, Zone Coverage, and Packers Talk. Additionally, he contributes to Cheeseheads Brazil. Follow him on twitter at @Aceti_Felipe.
__________________________




Comments (25)
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 10:42 am
Yes. If we don't burn a bunch of money on FAs, we should be able to add another 4 years to his deal. He's a solid player, he doesn't miss much time with injury, and we should keep him on the team.
SicSemperTyrannis
February 17, 2025 at 11:15 am
$41 MM cap space, should be able to sign him + sign FAs? Already have ve somebody on staff specifically to work this cap voodoo, it's TIME!! "Sense of urgency"
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 11:39 am
As TGR has pointed out, $41M doesn't mean you have $41M to spend. You have to have money to sign your draft picks, too, and some reserve to give you some flexibility during the season.
The first step is figuring out which of our own FAs we'd sign. I've mentioned before that we could retain McDuffie, Wilson, and Slaton....three of the 21 defenders on the #6 defense...for about $11M.
If you're not going to resign Stokes, we could sign a pretty good starting CB for around $15M. We could probably sign one good veteran Olineman for about $7M year, and/or use that money to extend Tom.
Three of our own, 1 starting CB, and a backup Olineman. We should be able to accomodate that in FA.
T7Steve
February 17, 2025 at 11:55 am
Hopefully they can squeeze a deal in for Willis too. If they can extend him, he'd at least have excellent trade value down the road if we can't keep him. Is he eligible for extension yet on his rookie deal?
dobber
February 17, 2025 at 12:30 pm
Should be...but I think he's looking toward FA and getting a chance to play. I don't think the Packers want to try to buy that out.
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 12:38 pm
Willis is a hard problem, but a nice one to have. He's under contract for this year but he does have the feel of a long term security blanket at the most important position. But maybe he's not content to be a permanent backup, like Terry Hanratty. Still, he's made over $4M already and another $8M over 4 years and he'd be set for life before the age of 30.
LeotisHarris
February 17, 2025 at 01:13 pm
Tip of the hat for the Terry Hanratty reference. You could have gone with Frank Reich or Charlie Batch, but you reached deep into the well for old number 5. Well done.
dblbogey
February 17, 2025 at 06:05 pm
Zach is an excellent right tackle just entering his prime years. This is a no brainer, first priority.
GregC
February 17, 2025 at 12:03 pm
This is an easy decision. Sign him as long as he's not asking for more than he's worth. FYI: I just read a story that according to Rob Demovsky, the Packers will be parting ways with Jaire Alexander before the 2025 season. Not a surprise, but I thought there was a chance they might keep him.
T7Steve
February 17, 2025 at 12:21 pm
That still must be rumors. The Packers wouldn't let anything like that out, especially with the guy under contract. No shortage of teams even in the North that will go after him to see if he's worth a fresh start.
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 12:29 pm
Steve,he's an expensive fresh start. Whoever trades for him is on the hook for $34M over two seasons, and there's no guarantee he'll play a dozen games.
T7Steve
February 17, 2025 at 12:35 pm
34 even with what the Packers have to eat? Wow!
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 12:40 pm
The $34M is salary or two seasons at 16 and 18. The $20M we eat is his pro-rated signing bonus and a restructure of $8M
GregC
February 17, 2025 at 12:37 pm
Demovsky has access to insiders who give him info anonymously. It's not guaranteed to be correct, and I suppose management could change its mind, but usually reports like this turn out to be true.
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 12:27 pm
I've read that too. You can't help the club from the tub, and the team is just done being frustrated with his unavailabilty.
IF IT WERE UP TO ME: I'd try to trade Alexander for whatever I could get, or maybe make him part of a trade. Otherwise, I'd cut him and save some cap space and eat the rest of his contract. I'd look to FA and get a starting, available CB for about $15M. It would be our big FA signing of the year.
I'd let Stokes leave, and I'd draft a CB to compete with Nixon and Valentine at the other CB spot.
So....Nixon, Valentine, King, FA, draft pick. Not necessarily in that order.
dobber
February 17, 2025 at 12:33 pm
If I were to cut him, I'd be using a Jun 1 designation. It pushes some of his hit onto the 2026 cap, but opens up a lot more money this season. Whatever the case, I'd want to wait to see what happens at least WRT signing a FA CB, and maybe even the draft, too, before enlarging that hole.
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 12:50 pm
I'm kind of going back and forth on that Jun1 thing, because I'm not sure if I want to carry it over to next year. And I'm not convinced we'd have to cut him because we might be able to make him part of trade.
I think we're going to get a starting at CB in FA, which doesn't even start for a couple of weeks yet. It's the biggest contract we have to deal with this offseason, and it's certainly got to be at the top of the GMs note pad.
DJ Reed = $15M. Assante Samuel =$12M And others.
SDPack
February 17, 2025 at 02:08 pm
Rumors are sometimes leaked to reduce a players value in the eyes of other teams too. The Pack would benefit if Alexander’s agent came to the conclusion that his guy could not make more elsewhere. The Pack could offer Alexander a reduced base salary with some guaranteed money and some bonus incentives to make as much or more than his current contract if he is able to play a certain number of games and snaps. I would also tie bonus money to work out incentives to help reduce proneness to injury. If we could retain a motivated and healthy Alexander, I would take that version of him over any free agent CB. Then you still draft one high and we would be loaded at the position.
dobber
February 17, 2025 at 12:38 pm
When you sign Tom has a lot to do with how they want to spread out his hit. If they wait into the season, they can utilize the extension to push some money further out and use leftover cap in 2025 to absorb some of the bonus money.
"Green Bay has a knack for finding offensive line gems in the later rounds, and Tom is a prime example of how effective that philosophy has been."
The best talent is at the top of the draft. When you keep thinking you can ply starters out of the later rounds and UDFAs, you might find guys like Tom (who was mostly being scouted as an IOL) and Walker...but you might also end up with developmental depth pieces like Travis Glover, Kadeem Telfort, and Jacob Monk who really aren't helping you on game day, and with hard decisions on the horizon may not be moving the needle concerning the future of the OL. Maybe Glover and Monk turn into viable depth pieces eventually, but they weren't in 2024 and it hurt the Packers against Philly.
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 12:51 pm
It's nice to find good players on Day 3, but if you go into a season needing Day 3 rookies to play well then you might be in for a tough season.
Alberta_Packer
February 17, 2025 at 04:51 pm
I have some sympathy for Glover - who was tossed-in cold against a hot Eagles D-line - having only played 13 offensive snaps during the entire regular season. One of the responsibilities of the Coaches is to prepare each and every player - for each and every game. It was obvious that Glover was not prepared to swim in the deep end. This is more on MLF than Glover.
dobber
February 17, 2025 at 06:15 pm
Don't get me wrong: I liked the Glover pick when they made it, and I think he still might turn into a useful piece on the OL with time...but he shouldn't have been OL7 at that point. You could point to the coaches, but I'd argue that's an indictment on the gamble they took on roster construction more than anything else.
SDPack
February 17, 2025 at 02:25 pm
Zach Tom seems to have everything you want to justify an early extension. PFF 4Th ranked. He’s been good since day 1. Not a trouble maker. Works hard. That is an easy one. I would wait and see on Rasheed Walker though. He is adequate. Grades out poorly but can be trusted in protection. He may be on the Jon Runyon path where some other team over pays him.
Since'61
February 17, 2025 at 03:37 pm
For me signing Tom should be a no brainer unless he is expecting a crazy amount of money. Sign him and move on. Thanks, Sinice '61
Leatherhead
February 17, 2025 at 06:45 pm
Some of y'all need to pump the brakes on Monk and Glover. I hope at least one of them becomes a decent backup, because they weren't even that last year.
I'm looking back at our Olinemen and what they did as rookies.
Did they play a lot? Not Morgan, not Rhyan, not Walker. Tom played in only 9 games as a rookie, started 5.. Myers and Jenkins were both 2nd round choices and both started early. Royce Newman played a lot as a rookie. Nijman didn't. Runyan didn't.
I mention often that we dress 9 OL and hope like hell we keep playing the same 5 while the other 4 play on special teams. Last year, we tried to go with 5, and a first round pick. It damn near worked, and the other three didn't see the field . This year, I'm hoping we'll go with 7 legit starters, at least.
Linemen get better that second year. An offseason of growth and strength training, combined with a familiarity with things, should make both of these guys better. I still think we need a premium pick on an offensive lineman AND we should sign a low cost veteran. Either resign Myers for $25M/3 years (that's his market value) or sign somebody better.