The Packers 2025 Draft Class Has Not Contributed Much So Far This Season

Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst declared over the offseason that the team needed to show more urgency to not just be good but to win the Super Bowl. He backed that up when he traded two first-round picks and defensive tackle Kenny Clark to acquire Micah Parsons. However, Gutekunst and the Packers have not gotten much immediate impact from their 2025 Draft class. In fact, few of the players selected in this draft have played significant roles through the first nine games of the season.

First round pick Matthew Golden has contributed the most thus far. He’s played eight of the first nine games and started four. The former Texas star has caught 23 passes for 262 yards thus far. However, despite the injuries the team suffered at wide receiver, Golden hasn’t established himself as an integral part of the offense. The Packers were without Jayden Reed and Christian Watson for large parts of the season. Yet, Golden did not step up and seize a large role in the offense. The Packers need more from Golden in the second half of the season.

Fellow wide receiver Savion Williams has contributed mostly on special teams. He is the team’s primary kick returner and has done an adequate job at that, averaging 25.5 yards per return. But Williams hasn’t earned the trust of the coaching staff yet on offense. Matt LaFleur has not allowed Williams to run the full gamut of pass patterns often and limits him to jet sweeps, end arounds, and other gadget plays. He has only nine catches for 45 yards and a touchdown while running eight times for 28 yards.

Second round pick Anthony Belton was selected to add size and physicality to the offensive line. The 6’6”, 336-pound NC State alum has missed three games due to injuries. He was pressed into the starting lineup for one game. Belton is considered a work in progress. He has size and strength but is very raw. He has struggled at times when inserted into the lineup, especially in pass protection.

It is interesting that Darian Kinnard was used as the extra offensive lineman last week against the Eagles, not Belton. Belton has played 24 percent of the team’s offensive snaps in the six games he’s played, but all but five of those offensive snaps came in two games.

Barryn Sorrell appeared in eight of the first nine games this season, but the addition of Parsons limited his role as an edge rusher. He’s only played 16 percent of the team’s defensive snaps with the rest of his game action coming on special teams.

Fifth round pick Collin Oliver and seventh round pick John Williams have spent the entire season on the PUP list due to injuries. The other seventh round pick, Micah Robinson, is no longer with the Packers. He made the initial roster but was waived and placed on the practice squad to make room for Parsons. The Titans claimed him off the practice squad and he is now on their active roster.

Sixth round pick Warren Brinson has been active for just three games. He has played 31 percent of snaps on defense in those games but has been inactive for most of the team’s games in the first half of the season.

It is true rookies have a learning curve. Most rookies to not make an immediate impact in the NFL. I am not disparaging any of the rookies on this team. But Gutekunst has a philosophy of drafting players who have outstanding athletic ability but who are also considered “projects” who need time to improve their technique before they are ready to assume larger roles in the NFL. Sometimes that works out eventually and sometimes it doesn’t.

However, if Gutekunst feels the team is in “win now” mode, which is most certainly is after the Parsons trade, then drafting at least a few players who he expects to contribute right away would be more consistent with that approach to team building. The Packers will need at least some of their rookies to play bigger roles in the second half of the season if they are to be true contenders.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (17)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
splitpea1's picture

November 13, 2025 at 11:12 am

Round 1: Nothing wrong with this pick, but for some inexplicable reason, the coaching staff and Love have not gotten him the ball enough. Too bad, he's a difference maker in waiting.

Round 2: Belton is a project who will be good someday. Meanwhile Tate Rutledge, selected three spots later is real good right now and would really help our IOL; the guy reminds me of one of the old Redskins hogs.

Round 3: A non-essential MLF type that has produced a little but not much. What would have been better in hindsight was to trade up one pick and nab DT Jamaree Caldwell--this dude is impressive (!) and really would have helped our run defense (once again) now.

Round 4: You won"t see much of Sorrell barring an injury to a starter.

Round 5: Who? Seriously, no timetable for Oliver's return. I doubt you'd see much of him anyway.

The only two that can realistically make an impact at this point are Golden and Belton; with the offense struggling so badly, what do you have to lose by giving them more opportunities?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 13, 2025 at 01:02 pm

Belton might have helped at RG, but they exclusively ran him at T. He is, as you say, a high upside, low current flaw project as a T at this level. Some see him as a G anyway.

LaFleur has not given Golden a chance to settle despite Reed being missing. That was an opportunity to let him grab a defined role but it’s not materialized and he’s appeared all over the place, often seeming confused as to his route, unsurprisingly perhaps. He’s fast but he’s neither tall nor big, but LaFleur seems not to care.

Williams was a pick I’d give back if I could. Not a criticism of him, but he’s all potential and no actual at this point. He’s not really even a true WR. He’s got upside physically no doubt, but in a year or two really. I have no idea why Gute picked him in a year of urgency. Oliver is likely to not play this year now even if healthy. In truth he became a lot less important when they signed Parsons.

The players we passed on at DT might have made a difference. A G or a C for the OL and a corner too, but much of this draft was picking for the future. Of the 2 that might not have been, Golden has been very badly incorporated by LaFleur in practice and Butkus essentially made sure Belton is a project for next year through his handling of him.

So I’m not really surprised most have added little.

0 points
0
0
jaxpackfan's picture

November 14, 2025 at 08:57 am

Great post split! In the 3rd they could also have moved up a little to grab Nohl Williams. He is a CB from Cal and is currently solidly on the Chiefs' depth chart.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

November 13, 2025 at 12:08 pm

Why isn't Golden more involved? Because the Packers are a "run first" team, who is the pass as a secondary, desperation move when the running game fails. And the running game is worse because the OL can't do it's job. Which also means that as soon as Love gets the snap, he usually has a lot of pressure put on him, and doesn't have time to find receivers for longer receptions.
It all starts with the guys in the trenches. Whoever dominates the LOS will have a big advantage. And right now, the Packers OL is losing it's battles.

0 points
0
0
FumundaStank's picture

November 13, 2025 at 01:43 pm

This is why Gute should be receiving as much criticism as MLF if not more for the teams current state. The draft picks and usage make no sense if you are going all in to win a SB right now, which the Parsons trade indicates that is what you're doing. The way Gute drafts tells me I want to have a team that wins more games than loses most of the time and if you get lucky might win a SB once every 10 or 15 years with the right coaching staff.

0 points
0
0
Vachio's picture

November 13, 2025 at 02:06 pm

If anything, the staff has too much confidence in Savion Williams. He's got the 3rd highest touch rate in the NFL (touches per snap), but there's not a ton to show for it. They keep feeding him the ball when he's on the field, but not much is happening when he gets it.

0 points
0
0
EnemyTerritory's picture

November 13, 2025 at 02:36 pm

This years draft class has been of little help. Just wondering what the picks would have looked like had Parsons been onboard before the draft…

0 points
0
0
FumundaStank's picture

November 13, 2025 at 02:46 pm

I'd bet not much different. They new they needed DL and DE help and look what they drafted.

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

November 13, 2025 at 03:17 pm

Golden has not shined, but he has still been more productive than the 2023 and 2024 1st round picks so far in 2025.

Savage, Stokes, LVN, Morgan, Golden (?).

The first round pick misses are starting to stack up on the GM.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 13, 2025 at 06:22 pm

Savage and Stokes were starters on defense as rookies, and played a bunch of snaps. Golden is the #2 WR on this team, behind Doubs, in terms of targets, receptions, and yards. Wicks and Watson are distant 3rd and 4th.

Morgan missed most of his rookie year with injuries.

VanNess played but certainly hasn't been dominant. He's in his 3rd year and we'll have to decided after the season if we want to 5th year him. His return can only help this defense, and the defense is going to have to play well all the time from here on out.

I'm not sure what a "miss" is, based on the rookie year. Is a starter a miss? An All Rookie? A rotation guy? A backup playing behind a good player?

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 13, 2025 at 03:58 pm

I think it's better if you don't count on very much from rookies. If they contribute, like Cooper did last year, that's great, but a majority of rookies don't really contribute much.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

November 13, 2025 at 04:33 pm

You're correct, even if we cast aside the soft bigotry of low expectations, these guys are works in progress. I don't know that we can fully judge how each has contributed to the team without seeing their day-to-day growth as players and as young men. I'm sure each has brought their own unique contribution to the team, contributions we may not appreciate until later in their careers.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

November 14, 2025 at 09:59 am

I’m not sure about that anymore LH. I think in recent years we could cite several rookies who made/are making significant impacts.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 14, 2025 at 11:41 am

As rookies? No. I don't think so. But I'm going to look this up quick.

xxxx

OK, I checked. It does appear to be it's common to have at least 3 or 4 rookies contribute. I'm trying to use a generous definition of contribute, too. Did you start, make tackles, take snaps, score TDs etc. as a rookie.

0 points
0
0
Ihappydirt's picture

November 13, 2025 at 10:28 pm

"Golden did not step up and seize a large role in the offense"

It's not like he can throw himself the ball. The kid has one of the highest rates of separation in the league, but Love isn't finding him. Often because MLF runs so often and so predictably that Love is facing balls-to-the-walls pass rush when he finally can throw.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 14, 2025 at 12:33 pm

He's getting targeted 3-5 times a game. He got 6 targets once, caught 5 for 58.

Doubs is getting the most targets, as he should, with over 6 targets per game.

After that, and considering Kraft is gone, Jacobs has 34, Golden has 29 targets and Wicks has 28. I 'd like to see Golden get another target or two, but who do we take it away from?? It's a zero sum deal...there's only X number of snaps/targets/opportunities in a game. Obviously, losing Kraft leaves more opportunties/snaps. Many of the snaps and some of the targets will go to Musgrave, his replacement. The few remaining should go to.....??? Doubs is our most reliable guy, Watson is the scarier receiver, Wicks has been equally productive with Golden....or should we just get it to Jacobs more?

0 points
0
0
Wilment's picture

November 16, 2025 at 08:55 am

Facts are stubborn things". True enough, this rookie class hasn't contributed. The job of the coaching staff is bring these guys up to speed. BG has done a decent job continuing the ftraft and develop way of the Pack,ers ,but now that the team has given up its first rounders of the next two seasons, the picks must be the best they can be and the staff needs to get them on the field to contribute. GO PACK GO!!

0 points
0
0