Packers Select WR Matthew Golden in 2025 NFL Draft - Round 1
By GregMeinholz

Matthew Golden, Texas, WR
MEASURABLES/PRO DAY:
5'11" 191 lbs
40 time: 4.29
Did not participate in the NFL Draft combine
VIDEO:
NFL SCOUTING REPORT:
Matthew Golden Draft and Combine Prospect Profile | NFL.com
CAREER NOTES:
58 Receptions for 987 yards and 9 TDs in the 2024 season. 38 for 404 and 6 TDs in 2023. 38 for 584 and 7 TDs in 2022.
FIT WITH THE PACKERS:
From the CHTV Draft Guide:
Golden is one of those players who has a seamless fit with the Packers in terms of skill set. His ability to win as a route-running separator will create windows for Jordan Love. Golden is also a reliable playmaker who Love can trust to make plays at the catch point, whether tracking it effortlessly or making a quick adjustment. He’s a little smaller than the Packers typically like at receiver, but it’s easy to see why Green Bay could make an exception for him in the first round.
COMMENTARY:
Matthew Golden marks the first time since 2002 that the Packers have selected a wide receiver in the first round, and Matthew Golden could be well worth the wait. He is a big play machine that can line up at all three wide receiver positions. He has the agility to create highlight reel catches, isn't afraid to fight for the ball in traffic, and has the potential to become WR1 on this Packers team.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________




Comments (83)
LLCHESTY
April 24, 2025 at 09:53 pm
Terrible. I'd bet more on Royals or Harris to end up as a WR 1 than Golden. Gutey fell in love in a 4 game span. Not good.
PhantomII
April 24, 2025 at 09:57 pm
He's better than any WR currently on the team....and hasn't dropped the balll....yet.
stockholder
April 24, 2025 at 10:23 pm
No, your terrible.
Golden was at the top of every scouts board.
@23 he was a steal.
dobber
April 24, 2025 at 10:34 pm
When stock gives Gute a thumbs up, it says a lot! ;)
jannesbjornson
April 24, 2025 at 11:27 pm
Most had him gone by #16.
LLCHESTY
April 24, 2025 at 11:32 pm
Like always you're a liar. In two years you'll be telling us Gutey made a mistake taking him.
Idaho Cheese
April 25, 2025 at 05:45 pm
Who was on the board that you would've chosen? I am not a huge fan of drafting a receiver in the first round (I hear Vic in my ear saying "receivers are a dime-a-dozen); however, given what was left on the board, I would have a hard time making a case for anyone left as a true first-round graded talent. Simmons OT from OSU? CB Hariston? Pearce Jr. (yeah, I would've loved him except I guess he is nuts), a SAF or an OG? Where we were on the board, it was either try to trade down (this may have been happening) or take Golden. With hesitation, I like taking Golden...I like it even more now that I have seen more tape of him. Even if he is not a true X, Watson will be when he comes back, and in the meantime, we have a receiver with speed that Ds will have to respect. Sorry for the length of the reply, and now making it even longer:)
harleycops
April 24, 2025 at 11:08 pm
LLChesty , we wait 22 years to finally pick a top rated WR in the 1st round and you make a bonehead reaction like that? So in order to please you, may the Pack not draft another WR in the 1st round until 2047!!
LLCHESTY
April 24, 2025 at 11:31 pm
Tre Harris had 10 YPRR vs man in '24, Royals has a 3.8 YPRR vs man in '24. Golden had .92 YPRR vs man in '24 and was worse in '23. More of the same.
murf7777
April 25, 2025 at 06:36 am
Maybe teams found playing man against him didn’t work very well….using one stat doesn’t tell the whole story. Watching his film you don’t see teams playing man very often.
Leatherhead
April 25, 2025 at 11:00 am
Yes, if data always told the complete story,which it doesn't.
Leatherhead
April 25, 2025 at 10:59 am
When the guy who is almost always wrong says it's a bad move, I'm encouraged.
This is a guy who has never watched a single game involving Golden, Royals, or Harris, and has based his decision solely, 100%, on data sheets and the opinions of others.
I didn't see us taking Golden. He's not as big as I would like him to be. Last year, in 16 games, he caught 58 balls for almost 1000 yards and 9 TDs. If he could do half of that....30 balls for 500 yards.....it would replace quite a bit of Watson's production.
I'm glad that when it was all said and done, the Packers chose to try to improve the offense, because that's where I think the most improvement is needed.
NFLfan
April 24, 2025 at 09:54 pm
He will be the new stretch-the-field guy but they say he is not ready to shoulder the team yet? Hopefully he and Jordan can start bonding starting tomorrow-lol.
4thand10
April 25, 2025 at 12:16 am
His last year he was almost 1000 yards (982). I’d say that’s production. Doesn’t even remotely appear to have drop issues. 4.29 speed. Shoulder a team or not… Between this dude, Reed and Doubs , I’d say the NFC north better invest in CBs.
PhantomII
April 24, 2025 at 09:55 pm
Yes, GB addresses BY FAR the biggest need by the team. Boys, we got more speed at WR....GPG
LLCHESTY
April 24, 2025 at 11:33 pm
BS
Idaho Cheese
April 25, 2025 at 05:52 pm
So you would have taken Ole Miss WR Harris? Golden is a better player, a better talent at least (player in the NFL is TBD). Again, the board dictates what Gute can do...I might have taken a flyer on Pearce Jr or Will Johnson, but other than trading down (partner?), Golden was the BPA. Just a side piece: Golden consensus ranking was 18th and Harris was 63. But as my late somebody used to say, 10,000 flies can;t be wrong about a POS either:)
murf7777
April 24, 2025 at 10:04 pm
I’m Shocked, but excited to see the offense expand vertically……Go Pack Go….
TKWorldWide
April 24, 2025 at 10:09 pm
When Derrick Harmon went off the board, I started hoping for Golden. But nothing would have surprised me. Tomorrow should be a good day too!
GPG
dobber
April 24, 2025 at 10:11 pm
I know the posting CHTV crowd tends to skew older, but we must be way past everyone's bedtimes. I expected more of a blowup here regardless of who the pick turned out to be.
Tundraboy
April 24, 2025 at 10:54 pm
Hey who are you calling old, we're geezers!
dobber
April 24, 2025 at 10:58 pm
Chronologically well-endowed!
Tundraboy
April 25, 2025 at 07:56 am
very true!
4thand10
April 25, 2025 at 09:25 am
@TK……I wonder if there will be a bunch of day 2 big ugly’s on OL +DL? That would just kinda be icing on the cake. I don’t see a huge need at edge like most do Cox Jr, Mosby…if Van Ness makes a jump, Gary is Gary …just. seems like more than serviceable edge players. The one thing I notice with Gute and LaFluer is that the depth chart has always been deeper than in years past. I have also been ok with Brooks and Woodens production. They have a bunch of street DL but I feel they have a chance to grab quality in Rd 2.
TKWorldWide
April 25, 2025 at 04:05 pm
Totally agree!
dobber
April 24, 2025 at 10:10 pm
As Phantom says, they bought the speed. Here's hoping he can get off the LOS and threaten opposing defenses deep. Seeing some comparisons to Xavier Worthy, who the Chiefs took last year and got good mileage out of as a rookie, but Worthy is way smaller than Golden.
Gute is seeing what we all were thinking was a key hole in the offense. Golden was a consensus first round guy and someone many didn't think would make it to 23. I think there was more bang they could've bought at 23 and found a field-stretcher later on, but Golden has what many people wanted out of the first round: a clear path to making an impact in 2025.
It was debatable whether they'd get that out of a first round DB or OL, and that was what was lining up as their next-better option.
beerandbrats
April 24, 2025 at 10:35 pm
Wrong answer.
Bitternotsour
April 25, 2025 at 04:21 pm
If MLF can't scheme Golden's releases off the line then he deserves to be ridiculed and then fired.
Racingdad
April 24, 2025 at 10:11 pm
It’s a golden day in Green Bay
LambeauPlain
April 24, 2025 at 10:14 pm
Boom Bust talent. He has potential to be a WR1 this year or next. Kind of a flash of late, but he did show up big in huge games.
His 40 and 10 yd splits are crazy good. And his feet are probably the quickest for a WR in GB since Adams. Hope his average production until last year showed he's finally on the climb to the ceiling.
dobber
April 24, 2025 at 10:27 pm
You zero in on something meaningful LP: one thing that Gute always seemed to look for at WR in the past was volume production in college. Golden doesn't have that kind of gaudy production.
4thand10
April 25, 2025 at 09:27 am
I’m not sure I see it that way 980+ yards against big schools in 2024 isn’t “ last couple game production “ . That’s great college production no matter how you slice it.
Idaho Cheese
April 25, 2025 at 05:57 pm
I agree. Watching the tape it looked as if Sark (coach of Texas sp?) didn't know what he had in him.ce: once realized he became a big part of the O. Not many a commenting that Golden is pretty damn good returner too!
splitpea1
April 24, 2025 at 10:18 pm
I think this was a pretty sensible and need-based choice. Now Golden does have a bit of an injury history, but then again, so do many players. We've just added some serious electricity to the WR room, and given the uncertain long-term status of Watson, it is most welcome. I hope Golden becomes the downfield star that we need, and I hope Love develops chemistry with him quickly.
Note to MLF: Please strictly limit his usage on end-arounds and other running plays. He's less than 200 lbs., so we want to keep him intact.
dobber
April 24, 2025 at 10:25 pm
I'm a little concerned with his size, too. We'll see whether Love's up-and-down accuracy hangs him out to dry.
This leaves the Packers decidedly average or undersized at WR. Maybe this signals more 12 personnel (think Patriots with Hernandez/Gronk, or even last year the Chiefs with Kelce/Gray)? Whatever the case, I expect a bigger WR to come later in the draft.
splitpea1
April 24, 2025 at 10:41 pm
We still have Wicks and also Heath (provided he makes the team). J. Higgins would have been a good size choice, but unless we double up in the second round, that's the end of that.
Coldworld
April 25, 2025 at 08:00 am
Golden is a very good player, but the odds of him becoming an NFL X are historically tiny. He’s a slot and maybe a Z if we can shift away some of the blocking. So are we moving on from Reed or still trying to pretend he’s more than a slot, something he wasn’t last year?
I’m going to step out of the crowd and say I think this pick
Is potentially determinative of Gute’s future with the Packers. If he thinks Golden will consistently carry the team as an X then he has put all his money on green on the roulette wheel.
If, however, this is a move more focussed on the Z role, then we still need a vertical size speed threat and LaFleur is going to have to change how he uses the Z to get more depth and require far less dirty work.
If Golden needs to play from the slot a lot, then it’s a pick that takes our otherwise best WR off the field or, failing that, out of position. Neither Reed nor Golden are good against press historically. Can we even thrive on the field with two such players out there?
To judge this pick properly we need to see what Gute does today and tomorrow. If, In hindsight, this pick looks like we simply preferred him to Egbuka, Royals, Harris, Bech as a Y projecting, then if LaFleur can adapt perhaps we are OK.
However, we could apparently have traded down and got any one of them and had a WR with less speed, more bulk and more ability to block as well as an extra pick. If Gute acts as if he thinks he’s just replaced Watson then, just as Reed did not, he hasn’t. Gute’s words are not reassuring, but actions speak louder.
LambeauPlain
April 25, 2025 at 10:13 am
Was there a trade down partner offering fair value?
It seems no one wanted Golden as much as Gutey. After Graham went at 5 then Nolan, Grant and Harmon were taken, I expected a trade down or maybe Williams/OSU. The top DEs also went quickly...but that didn't bother me as much as the DTs melting off the board.
Most Draft sites had Golden ranked from #10 to #20 so I don't view him as a reach. He has speed and quickness that is to the very far right of the bell curve. He seems to catch the ball well. So why didn't he product more until last year? This is what concerns me about him.
Hoping he's just a late bloomer.
Packers0808
April 24, 2025 at 10:45 pm
My guess the gadget plays go to the guy we got from KC!
nagawicka
April 24, 2025 at 10:28 pm
GREEN & GOLDEN
beerandbrats
April 24, 2025 at 10:31 pm
The Superbowl clock is ticking,,,
beerandbrats
April 24, 2025 at 10:50 pm
The lack of a response seems to indicate a lack of confidence. I believe a lombardi trophy would restore confidence.
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou
April 24, 2025 at 10:35 pm
Golden is the one WR I was hoping Gutey would pass on. His measurables are not the red zone WR I was hoping for. Having said this, welcome Golden! I hope you become a Jordan Love, and Packer fan favorite.
My hope is Musgrave is used differently this year, and stays healthy as he provides a skill set the Packers really do not have. A lot of Musgrave and Kraft in 2025!
My favorite WR's were T-Mac, and Savion Williams. Whoever selects Savion will be getting one of the best game changers in the draft IMO!
SDPack
April 24, 2025 at 10:35 pm
This is boom or bust stuff. Is this Tyreek Hill or Henry Ruggs III? We’ll see. The speed is there but basically one year of average production. It would also portend that they are not planning on Watson recovering to contribute.
murf7777
April 25, 2025 at 06:39 am
I highly doubt they take a WR first round draft pick based on whether Watson is coming back this year or not. Gutey and the Packers historically draft using a long term view.
SDPack
April 25, 2025 at 08:47 am
You’re right. Generally, the preference is to roster 5 WRs, but I suppose we might roster 6 given that Hardman is primarily special teams. So we would start the season with Golden, Doubs, Wicks, Reed, Hardman, and possibly Heath or Melton. When or if Watson came back, that 6th one or Hardman would then be waived.
NitschkeFan
April 24, 2025 at 10:36 pm
For those who wonder what the "experts" felt about Golden,
PFF draft guide had him ranked as the 24th best prospect.
The Athletic had him ranked as the 15th best prospect.
"Consensus" Big Board ranked him 19th best prospect.
So the Packers using pic #23 seems like good value. Nothing controversial about "reaching". Basically right where the consensus felt he belonged.
Of course some fans think they know better than Gute and every other analyst so they will never be pleased.
SDPack
April 24, 2025 at 10:41 pm
NF I love Gutey but his 1st rounders have been meh. Good drafts overall but what the heck?!
Thegravedigger
April 24, 2025 at 10:46 pm
It's simple.. if this guy opens up the middle of the field for all of the other talented guys on this offense, then love and the gang can be unstoppable
Coldworld
April 24, 2025 at 11:12 pm
He was a WR I’d not have touched. Not that he isn’t talented, but LaFleur hasn’t succeeded in stretching the field with smaller speed receivers and I really struggle to see Golden succeeding at either X or Y in the LaFleur offense as we have seen it. LaFleur is going to have to adjust it considerably if Golden is to have a chance.
Well, we could have picked Stewart had we had the chance, but we might just have drafted the new Hardman. Did Gute panic? Probably the way the draft fell no one wanted to trade picks and the targets had gone? Unless Health was a factor I’d rather we had taken Simmons, Williams or Campbell. I wish we had and saved WR for later.
A couple of players his size have succeeded. Obviously Hill being one. I suppose there’s a chance this isn’t the pick that begins the end of Gute’s time here. Just really long odds historically.
stockholder
April 24, 2025 at 11:36 pm
You said the same thing when we took Watson.
It's the "long speed" that we needed.
This guy will improve. Thats everyones point.
No one doubts his tools.
No other WR had his speed.
I'd take Higgins next.
Saving a WR for Later?
CW - WE Need Weapons.
Campbell is the only guy
that would have worked out for the defense.
And the Eagles Win again.
LLCHESTY
April 24, 2025 at 11:43 pm
You're a clown. They needed a man coverage beater and he's a chump vs man. Harris had 10X the YPRR vs man, Royals was about 4..5X the YPRR vs man.
Mathew Golden ,92 YPRR vs man. Not exactly what they needed.
Thegravedigger
April 25, 2025 at 10:31 am
Teams will play less man if they are scared of the guy taking the top off the defense, dopey. It will open up play action, it will open up everything.
Coldworld
April 25, 2025 at 08:13 am
I did not say the same thing about Watson. I said Watson was raw and over drafted as a result. That he was a project not ready to play. I said he was not great at over the shoulder and needed to be fed crossing balls. None of these things apply to Golden. Golden isn’t even over drafted, he’s just not a good fit as a Z in a LaFleur O or as an X historically. He’s also got a big overlap with our best current receiver.
Did Gute panic when all his guys were picked or are we now a 2 slot team. Yes we need weapons but I fear we chose the wrong one and at the cost of more picks too. Perhaps we trade Reed, perhaps we hope he can replace Doubs, or perhaps we win the lottery and he is indeed Tyreek Hill not one of the myriad Hardman types that have failed as perimeter guys in the pros.
LLCHESTY
April 24, 2025 at 11:39 pm
They needed someone that improves their man beating skill and he's the reverse. I don't know how you feel good about him as a 1st round pick with no 1000 yard seasons and .92 YPRR vs man.
murf7777
April 25, 2025 at 06:43 am
Gutey in an interview stated there were opportunities to trade, but they felt so high on Golden’s ability and character, fit in the locker rooom that he was too good to pass on. I do have my concerns he can handle the boundary but that seemed to be where he played most of last year. I don’t see him as a man who is going to come out of the gate high, I suspect it is going to take awhile to develop into the GB offense, just like it did at Texas last year.
Doug_In_Sandpoint
April 24, 2025 at 11:16 pm
First play of the year, deep to Golden down the right sideline. He makes the catch.
CJBauckham
April 25, 2025 at 08:03 am
The authority to distribute is not vested in me, but cookie to Doug for this comment
Thegravedigger
April 25, 2025 at 10:32 am
Took a minute for me to get this completely. Was it Watson and mvs that dropped opening day deep balls as rookies?
LambeauPlain
April 25, 2025 at 02:28 pm
Watson is still having nightmares after his first pass in the NFL, dropped by Rodgers right into his hands, and then dropped. That was against the Ugly Purple too. Ugh!
Now I am going to have bad dreams...
Starrbrite
April 24, 2025 at 11:39 pm
I wanted Mike Green, but Golden has me fired up. We have some good options ahead. Maybe the DLineman Hafley coached at Boston slides to us (can’t recall his name?)
In any case, I believe we’re in good standing.
Go Packers!!!
LambeauPlain
April 24, 2025 at 11:42 pm
The DL prospects melted away quickly before #23. It was the class of the Draft as promoted.
Still, Golden was a consensus top 20 pick by most...and his selection was not a reach...but still with some risk due to mediocre college production until last his last four games last year.
Boom vs bust was on display during those big, last 4 games of work and it was BOOM. At the very least he brings speed into the WR room and incredible quickness. At the best he will open up the playbook for LaFleur's creativity. He will fight for the ball even while he hones his route running. And returns kicks with electricity. That's a plus.
The last Golden Boy did rather well...
Good DL talent remains for Day 2.
LLCHESTY
April 24, 2025 at 11:49 pm
"Boom vs bust was on display during those big, last 4 games of work and it was BOOM."
Can you explain why he didn't do much before that? Never hit a 1000 yard season. Sucked vs man. Explain to me why I should get excited about a limited WR when they could have gotten two 3rd round picks and 34?
stockholder
April 25, 2025 at 12:04 am
Because the draft was in GB.
And someone must stretch the defense.
NJMagic
April 25, 2025 at 12:14 am
You are so off-base. Circumstances matter. He was in a new offense and when he finally got his chance, he shined.
It shows on film - his route running is Olave-like and smooth, incredibly smooth setting up DB especially playing off his speed, he understands leverage, and he plays big and contests catches
Since you are so obsessed with advanced metrics - when he finally got his chance to be "the guy" against TOP competition, his YPPR was an INSANE 3.37. 3.37!!! How's that for peak production?
This is the exact type of player one hopes for at this point of the round - if he was 2 inches taller he'd have been a top-10 pick and never made it. but his traits are outstanding and he matched it with top-notch play against top competition.
EricTorkelson
April 25, 2025 at 06:05 am
Thanks Majik ,,, for putting YPPR to rest
murf7777
April 25, 2025 at 08:28 am
Good comeback and research magic!!
NJMagic
April 25, 2025 at 12:05 am
For those worried about production, think we have to keep in mind he transferred and was underutilized early in favor of Bond. Once Sark realized his potential, his target share increased and he shone.
For Pack, one big selling point is that he was their go-to WR in must-have situations; anyone watching last year saw our WR wilt in the biggest moments. Golden played against top-notch college competition and shined in those moments.
Watching film, he also has some things that cant easily be taught - including adjustments to off-target throws (here's looking at you J Love).
If our window is open, cant see anyone else at 23 that would potentially contribute out of the gate.
and for those who say we have J Reed - plenty of good offenses thrive with a possession WR and two speedy smaller WRs...
excited to see what he does on the field
GPG
murf7777
April 25, 2025 at 06:52 am
Good thoughts….I’d add regarding his slow start at Texas was also due to him learning the offense. He went into the coaches office explaining his struggle learning the system and the coach simplified it for him. He stated that made all the difference needed to succeed in their offense.
TXCHEESE
April 25, 2025 at 08:32 am
First statement in your comment is spot on. I work with a few Texas-ex's and huge fans. They were telling me, Golden was totally under utilized the first 8 games of the season. When Sark figures out what he had, the offense took off.
I only watched him in the SEC title game and their playoff game against ASU, but he was really impressive in those two games, against two very good pass defenses.
Here's hoping Watson can return to full strength or close to by the stretch run. That could make the offense lethal.
jannesbjornson
April 25, 2025 at 08:45 am
Get another quick guy to work the zones and get the ball on the move. The post-up game is a 50/50 proposition.
Denver with the Three Amigos. Get open faster,move the chains. I would still grab Restrepo for his precise route running.
NFLfan
April 25, 2025 at 09:47 am
'Off-target throws'-lol.
4thand10
April 25, 2025 at 12:42 am
Looks like Gute went for BPA. Multiple 1 hand catches, doesn’t have the dropseys and 4.29 speed. Wow. I’m not concerned with size after watching him do nothing but stiff arm dudes. He weighs almost 200lbs. Seems like a ball of muscle that can run extra fast and also block. Tracks down underthrown and overthrown balls. A lot to like here.
Lphill
April 25, 2025 at 04:26 am
My question is was he worth taking over the edge guys and corners still on the board at the time of the pick ? .
Oppy
April 25, 2025 at 07:31 am
That is my only concern.
I figured the run on DL players meant the Packers were probably looking at CB with #23.
I'm just of the mindset that there are very, very few "special" WRs in any given draft, and there's more very good, impactful talent at WR to be found between rounds 2-4 in any given draft than probably any other position in the game.
Golden is a Packer now and I will enjoy watching how he turns out. I am just leery of first round investments in WRs vs. other positions.
Guam
April 25, 2025 at 08:07 am
I would have been okay with the Packers drafting Will Johnson despite the medical issues, but WR was a bigger need than CB and Golden filled the Packers need for a fast WR. Would have preferred a DT but the top DTs were all gone when the Packers drafted so WR was the next biggest need to fill and the Packers did.
Oppy
April 25, 2025 at 12:23 pm
I am probably in the minority but I do not view WR as a bigger need than CB for Green Bay in 2025.
Maybe I should clarify that a bit- I think GB definitely needs WRs, because Watson is injured and many WR contracts will be coming up at the end of 2025 and 2026. However, I don't think the Packers are in desperate need of an elite WR to be a competitor in 2025 and beyond... I DO think the Packers are going to need a top-tier CB to continue to compete.
I think the Packers have a good stable of WRs and I also think the drops issue- which is a very real problem- can hopefully be resolved with it being a focus throughout the off season leading into the regular season. I think the Packers have a talent deficiency in the CB room when Jaire isn't healthy and available to play, and that needs to be addressed for 2025 and beyond.
At the end of the day, I feel that there are more very good WRs than CB's in most drafts that are available in rounds 2-5.
All that being said, Golden is highly touted as one of the top 3/4 WRs in this draft, and he's a Packer now, so I will enjoy watching him develop and help this team win.
Guam
April 25, 2025 at 01:54 pm
I guess I am expecting Jaire to be with the Packers for the 2025 season and that gives them Alexander, Hobbs, Nixon and Valentine as CBs. Compare that group to Doubs, Reed, Wicks, Melton and Heath as WRs and I think the need was greater for WR. Having said that I would also have been perfectly happy if the Packers had taken Will Johnson at #23. Both rooms needed help.
For me the tipping point was 2026. Watson and Doubs are up for contract and none of the CBs are up for contract in 2026. Yes, Alexander is certainly questionable for 2026 but he is at least signed through 2026. Not so with two of the top three WRs. I am fine with drafting Golden.
LambeauPlain
April 25, 2025 at 02:34 pm
Not taking those DEs in the first didn't concern me. Seeing the those DTs go so fast made Golden the best decision in my view.
Today the DEs should be on the early dinner menu are the better group over the remaining DTs.
Llew
April 25, 2025 at 06:40 am
I wasn't in love with this at first...wanted a defensive tackle...but the best one's were gone (my man-crush was Grant). But remember the Packers have a deep WR room and Golden won't have to "star" immediately. They can pick their spots with him and put him in a position to succeed early on. And as we all know, you can't coach speed.
Doug_In_Sandpoint
April 25, 2025 at 08:09 am
Not so sure about that coaching speed thing. I often am coached to, “Hurry up and take out the garbage.”
DragonSilk
April 25, 2025 at 01:58 pm
Been waiting for a speed pick like this for a long time. 4:29! Are you shitting me? Now we've got Thunder (Jacobs) and Lightning (Golden) on offense. Now we need some mountains on the DLine. I want the next Gilbert on day 2.
Rudedawg67
April 25, 2025 at 02:28 pm
Watched some highlights of Golden. This guy catches the ball. Some of the downfield throws to him were underthrown but he was able to position himself well to make the catch. Love has a tendency to underthrow the deep ball and I hope he improves in that area, but I think Golden will make some of those throws look good. The speed is awesome, but he has the hands to go with it. His production was good considering he was a transfer learning a new system and the Longhorns offense spread the ball around. Welcome aboard 1st round receiver.