Packers Daily Links 8.11.10

Veteran wide receiver Donald Driver's contract extension highlights today's look at the world of Green Bay football...

The Packers don't practice today, although they will have meetings, film review, etc. The return to Ray Nitschke Field at 8:45 a.m. on Thursday in the first of a two-a-day...

Donald Driver received a two-year contract extension with the Packers. "With the new deal, he’ll also make $7 million this year: $1.0 million in a roster bonus he’s already been paid, plus a new $5 million roster bonus he received when he signed the deal, plus a $1 million base salary," reports Pete Dougherty of the Green Bay Press-Gazette. "He also had an offseason workout bonus of $207,000, but it was unclear how much of that he earned." That $5 million roster bonus this season should help the Packers work against future salary caps, if there are future salary caps.

Matt Flynn is highly regarded by other teams around the league says Bob McGinn of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. "A personnel man for another NFL club brought up Flynn's name in conversation about a year before that," writes McGinn. "His message was almost exactly the same: If he ever became a general manager he'd be trading for Flynn." The backup quarterback has not been impressive this training camp, at least in my eyes. I do wonder why he doesn't get a chance to play with the first-string offense more often. Even Mike McCarthy said his performance is affected by his supporting cast.

Defensive coordinator Dom Capers gave a common sense reason why Clay Matthews is being tried at left outside linebacker. “I think you’ve got to try to create targeting problems for them, OK, in terms of where he’s going to be and that type of thing," Capers told Jason Wilde of ESPNWisconsin. "If you’ve got Clay and Cullen lined up (on the right) together, all right, there’s no question where that protection’s going to go. And so I think there are advantages to have different schemes where we’ll move them around. Clay and Cullen are two of our top rushers, so you’ve got to try to keep them rushing as much as you can from various spots.”

Meanwhile, Brad Jones continues to work on the right side of the defense at outside linebacker. "On Tuesday, Jones found himself squarely in the mix on the right side, taking a number of snaps with the Green Bay Packers' No.?1 defense and looking as comfortable as he has on the left side, where he started seven games as a rookie last year," writes Tom Silverstein of the Journal Sentinel. The more versatile, the better, as far as I'm concerned.

Sticking with the outside linebacker theme, not everyone is sold with Brandon Chillar at that position. Michael Rodney of Packer Update is among them. "Chillar is a really nice guy to have on a football team, but he’s not a starting outside linebacker in a 3-4," writes Rodney. "Or at least he’s not going to be a very good one. At 237 pounds, he’s very small for the position." I tend to think that when the regular season rolls around, Chillar is going to be used primarily on passing downs.

Justin Harrell has generally been praised for being healthy, but for Bob McGinn, that's hardly enough. "Once again, DE Justin Harrell flunked the test," writes McGinn. "By now, his routine has become commonplace. Take a rep, slow jog or walk behind the line, remove helmet, take a knee. In the early stages of practice, position coach Mike Trgovac had to stop a drill in which Harrell's effort seemed to be the issue." Harrell has done a good job of making himself available nearly every practice. But McGinn is right. If he's healthy, now he has to make an impact.

An improvement by rookie defensive end C.J. Wilson was noted by Pete Dougherty of the Press-Gazette. "Any gradual improvement he’d made in camp became a noticeable jump Tuesday night, when Wilson came up big in one-on-ones," writes Dougherty. Wilson has been rather invisible through the first two weeks of camp, so any jump should come as good news.

Jason Spitz appears out of the running for a starting job, at least so far through camp." Spitz was the odd man out in the left guard competition when first-round draft pick Bryan Bulaga, who had worked exclusively at left tackle, was inserted into the battle with incumbent starter Daryn Colledge on Monday," writes Wilde. You have to wonder how much Spitz's back has affected his ability to compete at a high level.

Matt Bowen of the National Football Post has what to look for when it comes to breaking down rookie safeties like Morgan Burnett. "Cover 1, Cover 2, Cover 3 and some Cover 4 are the norm for the preseason," writes Bowen. "Use a little disguise before the snap, but get to your landmark and play football. We want to see if the rookies can handle the basic calls, know their run fits and when they are in coverage keep everything in front of them. The worst thing you can do as a rookie safety is to play too shallow and get beat over the top. Know the defense and know what the coach expects."

Speaking of Burnett, the rookie gets some expert coaching every single day at camp. "While the individual positional drills don’t get the oohs and ahhs from the crowd, they are some of the most valuable time during practice," writes Wilde. "And there may not have been a more valuable – or vital – session than the one that was going on Tuesday night, when Packers rookie safety Morgan Burnett was getting pointers from safeties coach Darren Perry and coaching intern Carnell Lake – two guys who know a thing or two about the position."

First-year wide receiver Charles Dillon has turned a few heads, at least according to Mike Spofford of the Packers official website. "Last Monday, on the third day of camp, he caught back-to-back passes fromMatt Flynn in the 2-minute drill, the second one an impressive diving grab over the middle for a 20-yard gain," writes Spofford on Packers.com. "The next day, he got behind the defense on a missed assignment and hauled in a long pass from Aaron Rodgers. Then last Saturday in the scrimmage, Flynn found him again in the 2-minute drill for a 30-yard gain down the sideline."

The roster move of putting Josh Bell on injured reserve and adding linebacker Maurice Simpkins is analyzed by Monty McMahon of Total Packers. "It will be interesting to see how the move affects the Packers long term," writes McMahon. "Coach Mike McCarthy openly regretted putting Pat Lee on injured reserve during training camp last season after the Packers lost Harris and Will Blackmon during the season. A player who ends up on injured reserve isn’t eligible to play until the following season." If Bell is cut, however, I think he can be signed by another team after six weeks.

Amongst the talk about the decline in attendance at Family Night, Mike Vandermause of the Press-Gazette got an admission of guilt from Packers president Mark Murphy. “We should have just given them the Hall of Fame,” Murphy told Vandermause. The Packers were victims of bad P.R. last year when after the Family Night rainout, the offered ticket holders free Hall of Fame entrance with the purchase of a Lambeau Field tour.

Tight end Tom Crabtree is featured in an article by Tom Silverstein. "In 2010, [Spencer] Havner's footsteps are being retraced by another tight end, free agent Tom Crabtree, who has come out of nowhere to make a serious run for a roster spot," writes Silverstein. "Just as Havner became too valuable on special teams to let go last year, Crabtree is making his name as a tough guy on the kickoff return and punt coverage units." Believe it, folks. Crabtree's chances of making the team are real.

Another injury to the outside linebackers continues to leave them thin at the position. "[Cyril] Obiozor strained his left calf and will be reevaluated with the other injured players by Dr. Pat McKenzie on Wednesday," writes Greg Bedard of the Journal Sentinel.

0 points
 

Comments (19)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
CSS's picture

August 11, 2010 at 09:35 am

Rodney (Packer Update) is really myopic in his perspective on Brandon Chiller. Actually, I feel as though many bloggers get this one wrong. IF the Packers rand 80% or more of their plays out of base, Chiller (at 237 lbs.) would be a liability against the run and a terrible fit at OLB.

That being said, I've read anecdotal references from coaches, analysts and players that indicate teams (including the Pakcers) run out of base 50% or LESS of the time. Almost half of every defensive play (if not more) is a sub-package.

Why do you run sub-packages? To create confusion and mismatches against the offense. Chiller is the type of athlete that can create mismatches given the right package.

So, would I trust him in base 3-4 against possible running downs....no. Does he offer matchup problems the remainder of the plays, yes. Again, it's about matchups and sub-packages. Analysis is overly simplified there.

0 points
0
0
bogmon's picture

August 11, 2010 at 09:42 am

Dillon doesn't impress me against the one's and he seems sloppy in special teams play...

I don't expect this guy to get a roster spot.

(also, I hate the mohawk)

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

August 11, 2010 at 09:57 am

He's what you'd expect from a guy who played in AF2. Wildly inconsistent with great flashes. He's made some great catches and turned around and looked extremely sloppy. Just raw.

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

August 11, 2010 at 10:20 am

Thanks for the link to the rookie safety breakdown over at the NFP. That 1st poster over there sure knows how to stir the pot, I dig his style.

GBP 4 LIFE

0 points
0
0
fhornplayer83's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:02 am

Haha... Love the comment thread on the NFP article. I think it's hilarious how uptight some people get over posts.

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's picture

August 12, 2010 at 08:41 am

LMFAO! Fortunately I can't monitor blogs all day, but, I just went and peeped some of the comments left after the last time I was there. Too funny! "Uptight" is right. Oh well, guess I'm an embarrassment and not a 'true' Packer fan. Bummer. Those tools wish they had half the passion for the G&G I do, that's why they attempt to trivialize my game. It's sad when people's insecurities are brought out by complete and utter strangers (sad or funny?) lol

GBP 'TILL I DIZNIE

THIS HERE'S REAL

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

August 11, 2010 at 10:35 am

Nice article from Pro Football Weekly on Bulaga:

http://www.profootballweekly.com/2010/08/11/packers-rookie-bulaga-off-to...

Cheers!

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

August 11, 2010 at 10:37 am

This soundbite from McCarthy in the profootballweekly article caught me by surprise:

"Things happen faster (at guard)," McCarthy said. "There's more to do as far as from an assignment standpoint. Your recognition and anticipation is something that is definitely heightened. Tackle is a cleaner position, especially the way we're built and the way we're designed from an offensive structure standpoint. In our run-blocking assignments and our pass-protection blocking assignments, our stress really starts at the center and the guards and works its way out. ... Guard is more of a challenge for a younger player, in my opinion."

Interesting take.......

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:04 am

McCarthy was quoted last year saying that in his system the guards are also responsible for calling out protections, as well as the centers. This is one of the very under-reported reasons Barbre flopped as a guard.

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

August 11, 2010 at 10:57 am

So I was right saying that CM3 to LOLB had more to do with Jenkins being on the right side than anything else. Just saying...

0 points
0
0
Brian Carriveau's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:01 am

You called it, dude.

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:13 am

Um, no. It has to do with Matthews being able to stand up to double teams. Period. ;)

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:19 am

And before anyone gets their panties in a twist, that was a JOKE!

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

August 11, 2010 at 01:15 pm

Lol at anyone thinking I would get riled up over something like this. I'm not Jersey Al.

There. I said it. ;)

(I'm just kidding. Please don't beat me.)

0 points
0
0
ChristopherJ's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:15 am

It's true that some teams play base defense less than 50% of the time, but if Chillar starts the game at ROLB, then he'll be out there on first down. That's the down when many teams still like to run the ball, which would make him a potential liability. Lining Chillar up outside in certain sub packages makes sense, but I also don't want to see him there on first down.

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:17 am

The best down to throw the ball is first down. - Bill Walsh.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:22 am

We could also get into semantics about what constitutes a 'starter'. Last year, several players weren't announced on the starting line-up during pre-game, but played greater than 50% of the snaps. They're, in essance, starters/1st team.

The Packer Update article is taking a 'one-size fits all' type of arguement (along with many others on the internet) that assumes the defense of a team is in a constant base (3-4,4-3,Tampa 2, etc..)

It's a fallacy and not accurate

0 points
0
0
Tarynfor12's picture

August 11, 2010 at 11:48 am

Except for the obvious positions,everyone else is a senario starter.

0 points
0
0
Asshalo's picture

August 11, 2010 at 12:24 pm

I had concerns about Harrell's performance early on. Yea there's a chance he could be healthy, but the fact remains he hasn't played a lot of football the past four years (if you include his senior year). That's a long time to be sitting on the sidelines.

If you would have told me at the beginning of Camp GB would bring in a veteran free agent OLB I would have said you were lying. Though none of the injuries seem to be that serious, it's looking all the more likely now.

0 points
0
0