Is Just Lucas Havrisik Enough Competition For Brandon McManus?

If I'm Brian Gutekunst, I'm bringing in more players to push Brandon McManus. 

Right around the midpoint of the 2025 season, it looked like the Green Bay Packers might have a legitimate kicking competition on their hands. Brandon McManus was missing time with a quad injury to his kicking leg, so the Packers brought in former Los Angeles Rams kicker Lucas Havrisik to handle duties for a bit, and he did well. One might even say he did very well — so well that fans were calling for McManus to be released once he returned and promptly started to miss kicks again. The Packers would eventually stick with McManus, bring Havrisik back on the practice squad, and then sign him to a futures contract to come and compete this offseason. After McManus ended the season so poorly with his playoff misses, is Havrisik enough competition for him, or should the Packers bring in even more kickers to push the incumbents?

It’s no secret that McManus struggled in 2025. After coming in midseason in 2024 and saving their kicking game — including the game-winner in his first game as a Packer — the Packers were quick to reward him with a three-year, $15.3 million contract. His follow-up was downright disappointing. Appearing in 14 games (missing three with the quad injury), he finished 24 of 30 on field goals and 32 of 33 on extra points. The biggest issue is that when the Packers needed him most, he came up flat. The seven points he cost them in the wild card round against the Bears would be the difference between winning and losing that game. When the Packers asked him to kick a game-tying field goal on a Monday night against the defending champion Philadelphia Eagles, his kick wasn’t even in the same area code as the goalpost. Yes, it was a 64-yarder, but in today’s NFL those types of kicks are becoming more prevalent. Once lauded for his big leg, he has only been asked to attempt eight kicks of 50 yards or more in the last two seasons. Thirteen kickers in 2025 attempted that many in a single season.

We could talk about the weird injury situation that played out with McManus. Was he more hurt than he wanted to admit, or was he not as hurt as the Packers were making him seem? It appeared there was a miscommunication between player and team. It made for a viral moment in October when, during a press conference, head coach Matt LaFleur commented, “I don’t talk to kickers.” He preceded that comment by saying that McManus looked good during a practice session after missing time and that he didn’t ask him how he felt. It’s interesting that a head coach wouldn’t ask his kicker how he was feeling, but if Jordan Love suffered a hangnail, we know LaFleur would be all over it. Maybe the injury was much worse than we were led to believe and lingered all season, directly causing McManus to underperform.

During McManus’ three-game absence, the Packers brought in former substitute teacher turned NFL kicker Lucas Havrisik. In those three games, he connected on all four of his field goal attempts while missing two extra points. He will most likely always be known as the kicker with the longest field goal in franchise history, thanks to his 61-yarder against the Arizona Cardinals in just his second game with the team. It was that kick that led to Packers fans calling for him to overtake McManus as the team’s primary kicker. That big-leg ability he flashed was appealing as a potential weapon for a late-season shootout. What added to the controversy was the fact that the team kept Havrisik on the roster for several weeks once McManus resumed his spot as the starting kicker. On the surface, it was probably just the Packers protecting themselves from losing him on waivers if they cut him so soon after his 61-yarder and impressive spot duty. There are usually a handful of teams looking for kickers midseason, and if one proves he can come in and make big kicks, then he is probably worth a team’s time to claim him.

So now that both are on the offseason roster, should the 2026 Packers kicking job just come down to a battle between them, or should the Packers add some more bodies? I’m sure the new special teams coordinator, whoever they end up hiring will have a say but I’m always a proponent of adding legitimate competition. It is kicker, so there are only so many roster spots you can dedicate to it — even on the 90-man offseason roster — but they should be able to add one more for camp; we have seen them do it before. I’m not talking about an undrafted free agent or an international-type player (for the free roster spot), either. I’m talking about a legitimate option to win the job and be the team’s kicker in 2026.

No, they aren’t going to sign Justin Tucker, but a veteran kicker looking for a job would be a nice addition. I’m not going to pretend to be a kicker expert, but a quick Google search would reveal that there are a handful of kickers with vast amounts of experience finding themselves on the market. Taking a chance on one — similar to what the Packers did when they signed Greg Joseph two summers ago to push Anders Carlson — might be the right move. I wasn’t in the camp that thought Joseph had a chance to win that job, but he was the one who survived the cutdown to the 53-man roster. Find a veteran who is willing to come in and compete for the job. Whoever has the best performance, regardless of contract status, should be the Packers’ kicker in 2026. After Jason Myers’ performance in the Super Bowl, a good kicker can make all the difference in the world. If the Packers are going to make a run and hopefully find themselves where the Seahawks did this year, they need a kicker they can trust in those situations.

-Dan Saia

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (26)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
stockholder's picture

February 26, 2026 at 11:25 am

Dump him. -
Pay clutch, not failure

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

February 26, 2026 at 05:22 pm

Which one, or both?

0 points
0
0
egbertsouse's picture

February 27, 2026 at 07:03 am

No, we reward mediocrity at 1265 Lombardi.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

February 26, 2026 at 11:53 am

If LaFleur does not speak with his kickers he should not be an NFL HC. That is absolutely ridiculous to me. Who else doesn't he speak with on the team?

Beyond that the Packers should either draft a kicker with one of their late round picks or at least sign an UDFA kicker. The more competition during TC the better and MLF should speak with them. Unbelievable! Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 26, 2026 at 01:02 pm

You don't fill up your camp spots with a bunch of kickers. You can scout the competitions on other teams as well.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

February 26, 2026 at 01:43 pm

I think they should use a higher pick and get the best kicker in the draft. There are at least a couple who consistently hit 60 yard field goals . That is what a championship team needs. How many more playoff games will we have to lose before we find a dominant kicker?

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 26, 2026 at 02:12 pm

How many Super Bowl winners have spent a high pick on a kicker?

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

February 26, 2026 at 04:06 pm

The Raiders drafted punter Ray Guy 23rd overall in 1973, and kicker Sebastian Janikowski 17th overall in 2000, Guy helped win three Super Bowls, Janikowski played in one. So, I guess the answer to your question is three.

Just find a damn kicker, okay?

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

February 27, 2026 at 07:33 am

With the new kick off rules the game has changed. Teams get one first down and they are potentially in field goal range. Kickers who can consistently kick field goals from over 50 are gold.
If you wait until day three the odds are the great ones will be gone. We have a great defense and offense. The Achilles heel at kicking has gone on long enough.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

February 26, 2026 at 02:59 pm

Don't waste picks on kickers!

0 points
0
0
Oxymoron 3339's picture

February 26, 2026 at 03:07 pm

Please don’t use any more Draft Picks on a kicker. I can’t believe I have to say this part - or a Punter or a Long Snapper.
How many GM’s have picked one of each of those? And failed at all 3.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 26, 2026 at 09:04 pm

The die was cast. The cult remains the same.. I really don't recall this guy defining a quest, or pathway to the SB. Holmgren took charge from his first press conference outlining what it takes to achieve the ultimate prize. The same confidence being true for Big Mike. Almost like they heard the voice of Bill Walsh chambering in their minds like a Guru. Like a winner.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

February 27, 2026 at 12:29 pm

Ridiculous is right ‘61—who does that—only MLF…very stupid.

0 points
0
0
BuckyBadger's picture

February 26, 2026 at 01:02 pm

Just because a player isn't in camp that doesn't mean that player isn't in competition for a roster spot. This is true for all positions but it is extra true for backup QB, kicker, punter and long snapper.

In camp even if you are the only kicker on the roster that doesn't mean the organization isn't scouting other kicking competitions around the league and comparing them with who is on the roster. The Packers could very well drop both of these kickers at the end of preseason and pick up someone else who might have missed the cut somewhere. Don't ever think just because they have these 2 guys that is all they are looking at for the position. Every GM, scout and coach has connections in this league they trust and they are in constant communication with.

We see this at back up QB a lot as well. Teams will dump all the backups they had in camp and pick up someone that was cut or they could trade for on the cheap. No one just competes with the guys on the roster to play, you are in competition with everyone that they have a chance to put on the roster as well.

McManus has been reliable most of his career and was 95% the year before. All kickers go through bad times and it is never a good time for it. Crosby had some real stinking years and they stuck with him with it paying off.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

February 26, 2026 at 01:06 pm

Good point, the Packers did exactly that with both kicker and backup QB in 2024 (Brayden Narveson and Malik Willis).

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

February 27, 2026 at 09:12 am

"McManus has been reliable most of his career and was 95% the year before."

Yes, but the 2024 hot spell he had in GB was an outlier for his career, and very few kickers hit at that rate for a full season (McManus played 11 games that year). The reason(s) he was on the market for the Packers to pick up were 1) allegations of impropriety, and 2) sub-average kicking for the 2 seasons leading up to GB. With the length of what's considered a "make-able" FG extending well into the 50s and even 60 yard distances, McManus's success rate beyond 40 and 50 yards isn't all that impressive. Yes, a couple of those misses were blocks and might have been makes otherwise, but that data isn't scrubbed from the pile for any other kicker, either.

This is the era of the big-leg kicker...Havrisik has one, but is also been pretty scattershot. Competition? Yes. It won't cost much to move on from McManus (enough to pay a replacement AND have enough left over for a vet minimum contract if they move before his roster bonus kicks in), but if they let his roster bonus guarantee, it's enough to pay a replacement. Kicker is a position where there ARE NFL capable kickers out there, and just about every team keeps a second on their PS. There's not a lot of reason for the contract Gute gave to McManus except for recency bias and panic.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

February 27, 2026 at 10:42 am

I wouldn’t be surprised to see a third kicker by off/pre season (though I don’t see it as inevitable). However, it’s rare that a kicker thrives straight out of college. Yes, there are some exceptions, but most bounce around working on technique with personal coaches. We don’t need them on board now and anyone we do pick up may well have bounced about the league and even a spring league a bit.

However, by camp, I’d expect them to only want 2 if healthy. There only so much opportunity to test mettle meaningfully. Remember, other teams will have kickers auditioning too. It’s a position where which camp you are in doesn’t mean much as it’s independent of schemes and playbooks.

0 points
0
0
TXCHEESE's picture

February 26, 2026 at 01:53 pm

Unless one of those two candidates struggles in camp, I would think you stick with those 2. McManus just picked a bad time to have an off day at Chicago. Every player has off days, It's the nature of the beast. Everyone's human. I remember Crosby missed 5 combined kicks in one game at Detroit.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

February 26, 2026 at 02:36 pm

The only reason I see brining in another kicker is if you need one during camp to make sure that the others stay fresh. I do not remember them having three kickers in camp. We might want to bring in a punter. Not for competition but just to give Whelan a break and have one ready if Whelan gets injured.

One thing this article did not mention is who is better at kickoffs. They might have went with McManus because they trusted him more on the kickoffs.

0 points
0
0
Slim11's picture

February 27, 2026 at 09:35 pm

Havrisik was not as good at kickoffs. He definitely had problems there.

0 points
0
0
PhantomII's picture

February 26, 2026 at 10:15 pm

If Lucas is kicking like he was last season...there is no competition....I still don't know why McManus was brought back in so early after injury...but the Packers do surprise me often with the lack of common sense and urgency of surrounding love with a good NFL OL and a good NFL DL..really hard to expect much every season without the basics taken care of for years now.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

February 27, 2026 at 07:46 am

Hint: Kicker Trey Smack, Florida. Walters Football has him as the number one kicker. . He is projected to go in RDS 4-6 in the draft.

0 points
0
0
Slim11's picture

February 27, 2026 at 09:38 pm

I saw him in the East-West Shrine Bowl last month. He played well, hit at 50+ yard FG at the end of the first half and was credited with one ST tackle preventing a long kickoff return for a TD.

0 points
0
0
mjbrogno's picture

February 27, 2026 at 08:08 am

If the Packers finally realize the importance of SP teams play the problem will be solved regardless of who the kicker is going to be. We have a great punter in Whelan, now find a comparable kicker.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

February 27, 2026 at 10:20 am

Another article designed to provide heat, not light.

1)Look at what BMc did prior to the time in question. Remember those other misfits that preceded him?

2)McManus was injured. I suppose a few of you think that doesn't make any difference. It does.

3) The best kicker in Packers history, Mason Crosby, had a bad patch one season. Of course the 'fire everybody' crowd wanted blood. Mason returned and was even better than before.

4)Having one guy, a guy who has been around awhile, competing for the job is more than enough motivation. While kickers are a dime a dozen, GOOD kickers are rare.

0 points
0
0
THESZOTMAN1's picture

February 28, 2026 at 05:47 pm

Here's how I see it:
We know what we have in McManus: Older vet; he can be very good, but is inconsistent. Also injury prone.
We also know what we have in Havrisik: Young but green. BIG leg (61 yd record is proof); missed a couple also.
So... let 'em kick in mano-e-mano competition all summer. And may the best man win (games for us in the fall.).
No reason to bring a 3rd kicker, IMHO.
The Szotman

0 points
0
0