Cory's Corner: Will Geronimo Allison Win The Job?

Can Geronimo Allison lock down the No. 3 receiver job by keeping Trevor Davis, Michael Clark and the trio of rookies at bay?

On Wednesday, the Packers will make their annual trip to St. Norbert College and unload everything from fans to fridges.

It’s here once again.

Training camp is back.

All 32 NFL teams have reason for optimism as the NFL season quickly approaches.

But I do have one question that will be answered in the next month: Can Geronimo Allison lock down the No. 3 receiver job by keeping Trevor Davis, Michael Clark and the trio of rookies at bay?

The Allison question is even more enhanced with Randall Cobb being placed in a temporary walking boot with a right ankle injury. Even though Cobb is said to be ready for Week 1, he will likely be eased along slowly in camp and that’s where Allison can take advantage of the valuable reps.

In Allison’s two seasons, he has started four combined games. His best game came on six catches for 122 yards in Week 3 last year. He had all that production and still only played 67 percent of the offensive snaps.

The Packers would obviously like Allison to take the next step and progress as a wideout. Because if Allison doesn’t advance, Mike McCarthy, Joe Philbin, Aaron Rodgers and the Packers will be relying on a player that has zero career starts at receiver. There’s something to be said about knowing a system, having a trust and confidence with your quarterback and being able to make it count when it matters most. Allison had seven catches on 12 targets on third and fourth down last year for a combined 122 yards.

Those stats are pretty impressive for a guy that didn’t see a lot of action. It really shows that Rodgers already has a pretty solid rapport with Allison and it can only get stronger with another August together.

Let’s also not forget how much better Allison’s numbers will be with Jimmy Graham on the roster. With Graham occupying a defensive player on the inside at times and other times a defensive player on the outside, Allison will get a lot more room to roam.

Now it’s up to Allison. He’s only 24 but still has plenty to prove after being an undrafted free agent in 2016.

Do the Packers desperately need Allison to nail down the No. 3 receiver job in order to win the NFC North? No. But the Packers need Allison to nail down the No. 3 job if they want to make the most out of their offense and make a deep playoff run that could mean winning the highly competitive NFC.

The wide receiver position is very crowded this year and it starts and ends with Allison. The No. 3 job is his job to lose.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (122)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
PAPackerbacker's picture

July 24, 2018 at 06:35 am

Before Rodgers went down to injury last year he has shown confidence in Allison. I guess it all depends on how well and fast the rookie wide receivers learn the system and gain the trust of Rodgers. Graham will certainly be a factor in the offense this year. That's what training camp and preseason are for. It is an exciting time for both sides of the ball this year. Allison could very well be a break out player this year. He certainly has the talent and trust of Rodgers to have a big year. And the talented rookies will certainly be in the mix to make a name for themselves. All the coaching changes, FA signings, great draft picks, and returning veterans will make for a very competitive training camp and preseason. Let the fun begin!! I am looking forward to it. Go! Pack! Go!

0 points
0
0
Summer_PackerBacker's picture

July 24, 2018 at 02:11 pm

Hey I like the name by the by, but to the point, I agree with most things you said, but I think saying Allison has the "talent" to break out is overstating his ability. There is not really any particular measurement that makes Allison stick out, what makes him capable is his acuity for being in the right place at the right time. We all know that Rodgers values this above all else so yes, this definitely makes it possible for Allison to stick around and perhaps even break out as you say. But if one of the newer receivers is capable of that, Allison becomes highly expendable. I have hope that ESB becomes a quick student and favorite of Rodgers, because his size and talent far eclipse that of Allison.

0 points
0
0
PAPackerbacker's picture

July 25, 2018 at 07:06 pm

I agree that if a rookie has a better training camp and preseason that Allison could very well be a rotation WR. Allison doesn't have the speed but as you say he has the ability to get open and be where he is supposed to be. And Rodgers will find the open receiver. This is why I think Allison has the talent to be a break out player. He won't draw the attention that Cobb or Adams or Graham will. Thus if he has the ability to get open he may very well be the one to get the attention of Rodgers. But as you state, it will depend on how well the rookies learn the system and gain the confidence of Rodgers. But I think, for now, Allison has the inside track on the #3 receiver. As the season progresses one of the rookies may unseat the #3 receiver. And as we all know injuries may open up more opportunities for another of the rookies. And we may very well have 2 rookies in the starting lineup. I sure hope not, but injuries are always a factor. For sure the Packers have the depth at WR to step in and make an immediate impact should any injuries occur to the starting receivers.

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 24, 2018 at 06:50 am

Consistency is the key. Cobb is consistent, but is injury prone. Can Allison step it up and stay on the field. The competition is young and seems talented. I think Allison will pull through, but not sure if Clark can make the 53. I can say the same about Yancey. What goes on where the typical fan can’t see will be the final decision and we can only scratch our heads after that. It seems there’s always a player we pull for.

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:08 am

The #2 outside wr starter is an open competition between Allison and basically 3 unknowns . I don't see much out of Davis, maybe Yancey or Clark? So this, obviously, is a unsettling situation. Let's hope for the best.

On a separate note, Connor Barwin signed with the Giants for cheap - a two-year deal worth up to $5 million. Sounds like 2-2.5m a year. He only had 5 sacks in 14 games last year, which isn't eye popping stats, but that would have been a cheap insurance policy to help offset injuries to CM3 or Perry.

Go Gilbert, Go Biegel !

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

July 24, 2018 at 06:58 am

I'm actually one of those that think the overhaul to the playbook was actually pretty substantial so the Packers won't be using 3 WR as often as before.

Now I understand McCarthy isn't going to completely get away from the roots of his offense that made him a "Highly Successful Head Coach", but I also think the Packers will start the 2018 season with 3 TE who can catch the football and use more 2 and 3 TE sets. IMO the possibilities with 2 and 3 TE's Adams, Cobb, Montgomery, Williams, and Jones when he comes back week 3 could be endless.

Allison has his place in this offense. The biggest reason why is depth right now. Rodgers trusts him and he knows the offense better than any of the rookies no matter how many changes have been made. I also probably like Allison more than most because he DOES work well with Rodgers when he starts scrambling buying time. Until one of the rookies gains the trust of Rodgers Allison is our #3.

0 points
0
0
Bure9620's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:44 am

Agreed, much more 12 and 22 perssonel groupings or 11 with Jimmy G split wide. Also, Allison gets jumped before midseason. My money is on J'Mon Moore. It also would not surprise me to see St. Brown on some splash plays. The kid is so athletic and long, MM will try to utilize that maybe even in the slot. "Big targets though the middle of the field"

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:03 am

NP, I agree with the 2 TE sets. I just don't envision ANY 3 TE sets being a regular part of the offense. That's just wasting opportunities for RB's (especially Monty). As for Allison he dropped way too many 3rd and 4th down passes for me last year. It just seemed like his concentration was off.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm

In that case you should stop throwing to him on 3rd and 4th down.
(Or “don”, as MM says.)

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

July 25, 2018 at 05:08 am

Here's my thinking on a 3 TE set as an example Spock....

The Packers lineup with Lewis, Kendricks, and Graham on the field with Montgomery in the backfield and Adams out wide. Depending on the defense the Packers could either pound the ball right down the defenses throat or split out Graham, move Montgomery to the slot and even have Lewis or Kendricks run a route depending on the defense. I like my chances running the ball vs a nickel defense or throwing against a base defense in that formation. Might not happen a lot but I'll bet it's something they play with more than most think.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

July 24, 2018 at 01:30 pm

Nick - What about Monty being a slot WR again.? Cobb goes outside. Allison is going to hold up the rookies. And Cobb will not sign for peanuts. Monty is better than Allison and Davis. Monty should be resigned and given a chance to start first.

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 01:53 pm

Is giving a 2nd contract to a guy who is as fragile as a crystal chandelier a good idea? Let's see how many games he is available to play this year before we start talking about 2nd contract. For the amount of games he has missed i would have a hard time giving him league minimum for a 4th year player.

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 24, 2018 at 06:58 am

I talked to to a huge man, yesterday, who tried out for 7 NFL teams. He said the speed of everyone was insane. The hits brutal, thick play books that you have to memorize all the time and nonstop film study. He called himself one of the “little “ guys at about 6’ 2” and 400 lbs. He said a DB who weighed 180 lbs knocked him out cold. I wish I could’ve talked with him more. He decided to stop after 7 teams and went to work. Hem must’ve made out ok judging by the huge RV he was driving. He actually did say the Packers were one of the teams.

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:20 am

6'2" 400lbs.?... he sounds like a walking square box. And the Packers was one of the teams he tried out for? I would have thought we'd hear about a 400 pound human being trying out for the Pack. And he was knocked out by a 180 lb DB? So he was an O-lineman getting drilled by a DB less than half his size? No wonder he didn't make it.

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:45 am

GPDAN. Maybe he was lying. I’m just repeating an interesting conversation I had. Just tried to make the reality of how difficult it is to make a NFL roster. And yes. A 180 pound man”missle “leveled in the right spot can be devastating. Like he said, “There’s always someone bigger, stronger and tougher “ He also said he didn’t get too far into camp at Green Bay due to being an early roster cut. I think his speed may have been his downfall even though he was a nose tackle.

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:29 am

Maybe he was telling the truth, but I thought if he got hit by a DB, he was on offense? Getting knocked out cold as a nose tackle by on DB playing on the same side of the ball sounds like a freak play. I've never seen that happen before

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:22 am

Im pretty certain Chuck Cecil knocked out a few linemen in his day, but a NT ? I dont know about that.

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:00 am

Ok. Whatever.

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:17 am

Do they give out playbooks to guys trying out for the team?

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:17 am

You win. I’m done.

0 points
0
0
freddisch's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:45 am

Did this conversation take place in a bar?

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:03 am

This is why I left this site. Too many experts who probably didn’t even play in high school. It was at a campground. Weren’t drinking. Geez. I made it all up. Happy now.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:40 pm

Don’t go, bro!
Don’t give up on us, baby!!
(Lyrics, anyone?)

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

July 24, 2018 at 02:49 pm

I wasn't dissing you bro, I was entertained by your story. Stay on site. Camp starts Thursday!

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:55 pm

Ok. Guys. Sorry I got a little offended. Thanks for the support.

0 points
0
0
PAPackerbacker's picture

July 25, 2018 at 07:16 pm

Am I missing something? You apparently didn't leave this site.

0 points
0
0
GBwastedthe12thoverallpick's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:07 am

Allison will "win" the WR3 spot, by default, but J'Mon Moore will unseat him by midseason.

0 points
0
0
jww061356's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:15 am

I hope Allison is a depth guy, that we truly use more 2 TE sets. I have nothing against Allison, but we need one of the kids to both gain Rodgers trust and demonstrate some explosiveness and the ability to separate. I don't think Allison has either of those qualities when it is time to play against elite defenses. I also really believe Mercedes Lewis could be a piece that really does a number on defenses. I think we are talking about a guy that can flatten people at the point of attack and still be a safety valve for Rodgers. I think one of the new kids will demonstrate the smarts and explosiveness to be a factor as the season wears on, and I think Davis and Yancey are as good as gone(barring the usual annual rash of injuries). I can see a scenario where we start the season in a lot of 2 TE sets and eventually one of the kids forces his way on the field.

0 points
0
0
GBPDAN1's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:30 am

I agree jww. Allison is ok, but not as our #2 outside WR. He's a # 3-4 outside receiver at best and Clark, Yancey and Davis have a good chance of not making the team?

So, 3 rookies, mid to late rd picks, are what we have to hope for as a starter this year as I see a lot of #2 outside CBs getting the best of Allison

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:38 am

The packers will have a problem if they stay with Allison. 1. 4.67 is not a #3 WR. Heck he couldn't even fill in; if Adams or Cobb go down. 2. If Cobb goes next year, where is the development? 3. We now have Graham. A Te that runs faster than a WR? Graham could pick up the slack, but can't be a #3 WR. 4. I see them keeping Davis before Allison. But Moore will beat them both out before mid season. So why keep Allison? The packers didn't think of chemistry when they let James Jones go. Even Nelson or Driver. It's time to FIX the WR position. The packers need separation. They need depth. If the rookies can't do it sign someone else.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:17 pm

This "Packers WR's don't get separation" thing is a myth at this point.
Coverage in the NFL is tight. QB's are expected to make throws into tight windows, and often to get the ball out of their hand well before the WR has made their break, in order to succeed in the NFL.

It's the only knock on Rodgers I have. He actually under-utilizes his WRs. Didn't used to be that way. Protecting the ball is a priority, but Rodgers' quest for the interception-free play has put him in a state of paralysis with all but his most trusted targets. I love Rodgers, best QB in the league.. but he could be so much better. He does less with his stable WRs than any other "top" QB i've seen. It's the one thing, the only thing, Favre did better than Rodgers.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:42 pm

Respectfully disagree.
4 was much better at texting.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:58 pm

Out-of-focus Croc shots aren't my thing, lol

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 01:29 pm

Well played, señor.

0 points
0
0
jww061356's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:19 pm

I would agree, Oppy. How long Rodgers hold the ball sometimes just makes me nuts. Sometimes, throw the check down or throw it away. I also think he doesn't do enough to throw guys open.

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 25, 2018 at 07:10 am

Sometimes the timed three step, five step routes get knocked off the synchronized timing that is so crucial that Rogers looks to the second or third receiver which can also lead him to scramble. I think Rogers is such a perfectionist that he expects the receivers to be the same. There’s only so many Jordy Nelson’s in the league. Young receivers have a lot to learn and as we all know “trust” from the “man” is key. Let’s hope the young receiver group as a whole has the smarts and will to study.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 25, 2018 at 12:04 pm

Jww, agreed. Sometimes, you need to just get the ball out on time- either trust the WR to make the play, or take the check down. Keep it moving! Drives me crazy when we see games- usually a few each season- where Rodgers is holding the ball, breaking pocket, and the offense can't get anything going. Then we'll have a drive where Rodgers gets to the top of his drop, makes his reads, plants his foot and delivers the ball on time, taking what the defense gives him (AKA: executing the offense!), and we'll see the offense come to life and keep the chains moving for a 13 play drive and score... then the next drive it's revert to holding the ball and looking for the glory shot. .Ugh, drives me nuts.

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:42 am

The question is Adams, Cobb, and who takes that #3 WR spot? The reality of the situation is Adams, Graham, Cobb, and who is #4? Does your #4 WR really make a difference? I think injuries will cut into that depth, so my pick would be Yancey. The 2nd year leap will make a difference between his skills and Allison.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:48 am

As far as the #3 WR role in this offense, I am not sure how important it will be. Outside of injury to the top 2 guys...
With 3 threats at TE, with 3 threats at RB and 1 of them being a former WR, I don't know how vital the #3 WR will be to the offense this year.
I wouldn't be surprised if the #3 spot will be split up between players based on situations. I think its going to be a matchup type of thing.

I expect to see a lot more 2 TE sets. I wouldn't be surprised if our primary personnel grouping is 2 WR, 2 TE and 1 RB.
The versatility and abilities of Graham and Lewis provide us a lot of options on offense.

I do think Allison will be the #3. I am not sure how much he will be used though. I don't think we can expect to much out of the trio of rookies at least early. And Clark will still be raw and we don't know how much Yancey improved. Davis could push him for the #3 spot but there is a chance he doesn't even make the 53.

I do think they need Allison to be the #3, but they won't need to rely on him like they would have had to in the past.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:06 pm

Agreed 100%. As long as Adams/Graham don't get hurt (and Cobb to a lesser extent) Allison will be facing the worst DB on the opposing defense on a per snap basis. No one will be worried about him. He can produce in that situation - for that matter, I'm curious to see if Moore will be able to do the same....

Everything changes with any injury to the top couple pass catchers. Past Adams and Cobb, there are lots of bodies at WR with potential. I'm not at all confident that there are actual NFL average level players in those spots. At least for 2018.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

July 24, 2018 at 10:03 am

In reality Graham is our #3 WR. He just has the TE title next to his name. I think we will see a ton of 2 TE sets with Graham and Lewis. The versatility with the 2 is just to great to not have them play a lot. There are so many mismatches they can use with those 2 players. If they add Montgomery to that group they can go from 1 RB, 2 TE, 2 WR's to 1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR's, to 0 RB, 1 TE, 4 WRs.
I think we will see that line up a lot this year.

That being said they will use 3 and 4 true WR sets. I wouldn't be surprised at all if any of the 3 rookies are option 3 and/or 4.

I agree with you as well. Whether Allison or Moore or whoever is the #3, they will have some really favorable matchups. Hopefully they can exploit them!

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

July 24, 2018 at 02:28 pm

lol. Bearmeat's Phantom Downvoter Strikes Again! We say the same thing with slightly different words. You get +3 and I get a -2. It's really funny.

0 points
0
0
4thand10's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:43 pm

Hey , I saw that but gave an upvote to balance out the nonsense. I also happen to agree with you.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:38 pm

Bearmeat gave you a thumbs up right back, there guy! ;)

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 06:59 pm

I got a down vote for saying Chuck Cecil may have knocked out a few linemen.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

July 25, 2018 at 07:08 am

oh trust me I know exactly what you're saying.

To be fair when I looked at it yesterday there was a lot of down votes and no hardly any up votes.

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 25, 2018 at 03:17 pm

I still can’t give either thumbs on my phone. What am I doing wrong. I’m old school. Watched all of Bart Starr’s games when I was young. See how old I am. That’s probably why I can’t figure it out.

0 points
0
0
Bure9620's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:04 am

From what I can see, MM has asked BG for size and length, with athleticism, at the WR position that all play above the rim, to create advantageous matchups. The Packers are the tallest, longest WR group in the league now, particularly factoring in Jimmy Graham at 6'7." These rookie WRs are young and inexperienced but their speed and frames still create problems say from the slot against a 5'10" corner. There is more "room for error" with these guys when they have half a foot on the guy covering them and Rodgers "trust" in them should not be as big of an issue. I see all 3 playing at some point in certain situations depending a matchups.
Potentially 5 or 6 pass catchers all over 6'3" is a nighmare for d coordnaitors, regardless of their experience.

0 points
0
0
kevgk's picture

July 24, 2018 at 01:57 pm

I agree. Trying to rank these players puts them into arbitrary categories that ignores the context they are used in. The number 3 WR means something different for every game, position the player plays (boundary/slot), size and skills, the makeup of the defense, and the availibility of other players. Why bother when everybody has different opinions on how a depth chart should be organized? We should just look at what individual players add to a team releative to other players and the team organization.

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 25, 2018 at 03:18 pm

Also a faster team.

0 points
0
0
Andrew Lloyd Peth's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:14 am

Here's the biggest mistake people make with Allison: They assume there's only one factor in play--that if he's a better receiver than the other 5 RIGHT NOW, then that's enough.

But here's reality: We must look at the total package, not just one factor.

Other factors are:

1. What does the player offer on special teams, where speed is key?

2. What potential is offered by a player's athleticism versus others on the roster? What's his ceiling?

3. How many years is the player under a cheap contract?

4. Do we want other teams developing our players with higher potential?

5. What has low athleticism done to our receiving group in recent years?

Since Allison offers nothing on special teams, has the lowest ceiling going forward, is in his final year, will cost us a better young talent to keep him, and typifies the very kind of receivers hampering our passing game...

...then he needs to GREATLY outplay all 5 of the options to be worth keeping.

We can't just look at one factor, but I have no doubt McCarthy will do just that. He'll override Gute--who has no influence--and keep the guy who makes him feel a bit safer in 2018.

Allison will be kept, and a better talent will be lost. Bank on it.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:35 am

I had absolutely no idea what you thought about this.
Now I do. ;)
~~~~~~~~

0 points
0
0
Andrew Lloyd Peth's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:46 am

Yeah, I'm pretty shy with my opinions...

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:49 am

LOL
Then you came to the right place.

0 points
0
0
Bure9620's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:08 am

Agree with you, Allison is what he is at this point and the ceiling of the younger WRs is much higher. Atleast one of the 3 will become a contributor, likely this year. Allison has to create absolutely no doubt he is a significantly better option and I'm not sure he is. He was a UDFA for a reason.

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 10:03 am

You must really have it out for Gmo. If the 3 rookies display NFL calibre talent, they will be kept. If not, they will be released. Its as simple as that. Most teams keep 6 receivers Adams, Cobb, Gmo & 3 rookies would not be far fetched. I wouldnt lose any sleep if Davis, Clark and Yancey were released.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:28 am

Also, not so sure that the PS isn’t a realistic spot for one (or more) of them for now. I think many of us have an unrealistic idea that ANYBODY that GB tries to put there will be immediately swooped down upon by another team (cough, cough, they wear purple). If other teams were so crazy for any of these guys they wouldn’t have lasted till the 5th round or later.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:30 pm

TK, I tend to agree that we often over-value our rookies and players in general.

However, I think these three WR rookies are just too good of the so called Height-Weight-Speed prospects for other teams to pass up should they be exposed to the waiver wire. I believe someone would take a flier on any one of them.

I feel the Packers did try to sneak one on to practice squad, it would be Marquez Valdez-Scantling, only because he has a reputation for not being motivated or generally receptive to coaching. Even then, I fear the risk-to-reward for attempt to develop a talent with that length, frame, and speed is too great for other teams to pass up.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:44 pm

Could be, big O. Time will tell. It’ll be fun to see what happens.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

July 24, 2018 at 01:15 pm

TK - Why keep Allison,(?) When Monty could step back into being a WR without a sweat. Wouldn't it be more logical to play Monty first; as your Wr./slot. The Rbs are set. I'd give these rookies every chance in the world. Forget Allison. Move on.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 01:31 pm

Curious to see if 88 is “strictly” a RB this year or not...

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 02:02 pm

Agreed Oppy. Many on herecdo overvalue Packers players. A month ago someone on here was still thinking the Packers could still get a draft pick for Hundley. I'm reasonably confident other teams can a QB somewhere that stinks up the field without giving up a draft choice.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

July 24, 2018 at 03:13 pm

I agree. We point to McCaffrey and Dupre last year, but by all accounts the Packers offered them PS spots and they turned them down. They chose to go elsewhere. McCaffrey ended up back in GB and they let him go. Dupre languished on Buffalo's PS. I wouldn't be surprised if the Packers look at these three rookie receivers, identify the one who is the biggest long-shot, and limit his PS snaps so as not to create much film. There are a lot of HWS prospects out there who can't catch a lick and won't get picked up after cutdowns...it could be that one of these three just isn't an NFL WR. No matter how much hype we put behind these rookies now, I think the Packers will be lucky if one of these three turns into a quality NFL player and another is a useful role player. That would be a pretty good return on a 4th, 5th, and 6th rd WR.

As for Allison on ST: no he's not a gunner, but he played the 9th most ST snaps for the Packers in 2017. Keep in mind that I'm not an Allison supporter, but he must have been offering something on ST.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:44 pm

Big D, you and Dupre are speaking my languish!

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 25, 2018 at 12:15 pm

Dobber, I know that statistically, you're right- we'll be luck to have one of these lanky speedy rookie WR's develop into a true NFL starter.

However, I feel like we might have beat the odds and snagged 2 this draft.

For the record, while J'mon is considered "most NFL ready" of the three.. I just have a feeling about ESJ.. Athletic freak+Length+Genius+Crazy work ethic? I think his ceiling is way up there and he might have the drive to reach it.

Fingers crossed. :)

0 points
0
0
carlos's picture

July 25, 2018 at 03:27 pm

I hope they all make it. Wouldn’t want to expose them to the waiver wire either.

0 points
0
0
Rak43's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:12 pm

I agree on the rookies Oppy, but I think a lot of other things get over valued as well such as 40yd times for WR's. On 99% of plays most WR's do not run a straight line sprint from a track runners position for 40 yds untouched before the QB throws them the ball. I mention this because it seems many posters are hung up on G'mo's 4.67 40 yd dash time. But there are a number of very good WR's who even today have similar times and worse agility numbers. Larry Fitzgerald comes to mind as he ran a 4.63, Jerry Rice a 4.71, Cris Carter a 4.63, Anquan Bolden a 4.71, Chad "Ochocinco" Johnson a 4.60, and Brandon Lloyd 4.62 just to name a few. I think most posters on here know I'm a G'mo fan and think he'll do well and have a breakout year. People also keep saying he'll hold back the rookies on the roster but Scantling' and Moore are both 23 while G'mo is 24 with a 2 year lead in experience. G'mo still has room to develop further imho.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

July 25, 2018 at 12:11 pm

Could not agree more, Rak47. Stats and Metrics are part of the picture, but there's no context without watching a player play. What players do on the field is all that really matters- for every purported physical shortcoming a player could have, there's twice as many ways a to surmount those obstacles to compete and achieve.

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:03 am

Lets not forget, we get to draft again next year. I'd love to have all 3 rookies come in and make an immediate impact but, the chances of that are pretty minute. The only young wideout i remember getting released that went onto big things was Chris Carter when he was released by philly. That is 1 in probably a thousand or more.

Next year there will be more size, speed development players available if any or all 3 rookies are released.

0 points
0
0
Barnacle's picture

July 25, 2018 at 06:05 am

ALP

MM’s logic and yours are different. Your analysis makes sense. I think MM ignores facts and stubbornly sticks with his initial opinions.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:22 am

We all have high hopes for the rookies, but those hopes shuld be tempered this early in the year. A year ago the Packers drafted Malachi Dupre from LSU in the 7th round. He was supposedly the steal of the draft, was touted as a potential #1 draft choice after his junior year, and had size and speed. He did absolutely nothing in camp and was an easy cut. I think we need to see the Packer's three rookie WRs in camp for awhile before we decide whether they are keepers or not.

I hope at least two of the three are impressive and make the cut, but I think Allison makes the team over one of the three rookies. I have no idea which rookie doesn't make it, but odds are one won't and Allison is a veteran and has Roger's trust.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:24 am

Sorry, "should", not "shuld". Need to do a better job of proof reading!

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:45 pm

I prefer 80 proof (reading).

0 points
0
0
fthisJack's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:38 am

i see Gmo as the #3 WR. he doesn't have great speed but he catches the ball and gets open. he was great on 3rd downs when he got the opportunity. he knows the playbook and that's a big advantage over the rooks.
i also wouldn't overlook Clark or Yancey. they could make that second year leap and make it hard to cut them. i could even see the Packers keeping 7 WR. its going to be an interesting battle to see who steps up and takes advantage of their reps!

0 points
0
0
EdsLaces's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:40 am

I like Geronimo alot, but judging by the draft picks they are clearly after speed. Geronimo happens to be....not fast. This is gonna be fun to watch .

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:54 am

The only thing that matters is fielding the best 53 man roster to win in 2018. If one of our rookies or Yancey, or Davis or someone else is better than Allison that is who makes the team and earns the #3 spot.

Maybe Allison remains with the team but further down on the depth chart. All this needs to be sorted during TC and could be impacted by injuries.

Rodgers may have a say in the WR group as well. He likes to have receivers who know where they are supposed to be and when they are are supposed to be there. The Packers also prefer receivers who have experience with the scramble drill for Rodgers when he leaves the pocket. These scenarios favor veteran receivers.

It may be difficult for one of the rookies to break through the group of incumbents but IMO the best players play. So if someone is better than Allison they play before him, assuming he makes the team at all.

It's about fielding the best team for 2018. To me that's what the upcoming process is all about.
Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Andrew Lloyd Peth's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:22 am

I disagree. The Packers won't just be in existence for 2018. Future years kind of matter too...

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:39 am

Yes, there will be future seasons but 2018 is the only season that matters now. We can worry about 2019 when it gets here. With injuries, salary caps and free agency who knows who will even be on the team when 2019 rolls around. I want players and coaches who want to play and win today not at some nebulous point in the future that may never happen.
Lombardi never worried about winning in the future. He understood that it is about win now or be gone.

One play, one game and one season at a time. Professional sports are about winning now. Not about next season, or the next or the next.

Under TT the Packers have been building for the future since the 2010 SB and as a result we were often a player or two short, at least, especially in the playoffs. Gute is beginning to change that by adding pieces like Graham, Wilkerson and Lewis. FAs who can make plays and help us win this season.

As long as we have Aaron Rodgers we should play all out to win every season and none of us know what can happen by the time 2019 or other future seasons roll around. Use every approach allowed to field a winning team for 2018. Win this season and worry about future seasons when they get here. A Super bowl win in 2018 means a lot more than a possible chance at a Super Bowl down the road who knows when. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Andrew Lloyd Peth's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:57 am

Anyone who builds their team only for the current year is guaranteed to destroy their team.

Thompson failed because of poor drafting and allowing McCarthy to keep bad coaches (and his job). You don't miss on countless high picks and then blame "Too little spending for this year!" as the culprit.

So sorry, '61, but I disagree. Strongly.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 10:32 am

ALP - your position is fine. But why does building a team to win this season guarantee a team's destruction? Are you saying that if the Packers win the SB this season their team would be destroyed?

Have the Eagles been destroyed because they won the 2017 SB?

Yes, theoretically you can put a team into cap hell. But I don't think the Packers or the Eagles, for example, have done that with their current rosters. All I'm saying is that via the training camp/pre-season process the Packers need to field the best 53 players they have to win in 2018. That's what the TC process is about. Now it is possible that the Packers will need to sign a player or two due to injuries but that doesn't mean they would destroy their team, but they should sign players that could help them win in 2018.

Getting back to Allison, which is the point of the article, if the Packers keep Allison over one of their rookie prospects because has a better camp I don't think that destroys their team for the future either. With the possible exception of the QB position the one thing we know about the NFL is that there is always another player out there, whether it is a rookie, FA or UDFA.

Last season proved that if we lose Aaron Rodgers, then we destroy the team. Beyond him, they will all come and go and in fact the players at every other position have come and gone during Rodgers tenure and the team has not been destroyed.

As for future seasons and what will happen I leave it with Shakespeare's Hamlet, "it will be like the fall of the sparrow, it will come when it will come". Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Andrew Lloyd Peth's picture

July 24, 2018 at 10:33 am

A ridiculous comparison.

I'm speaking of you solely focusing on this season, insisting it's all that matters. That is your position, and I'm responding to it. No one is saying winning this year destroys next year.

Let's lay off the strawman arguments, okay? If you're beat, tip your hat to the better argument and let it go. Don't invent another one to fight.

0 points
0
0
CJ Bauckham's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:14 am

Keeping Allison over a rookie is a drop in a bucket; not the be all end all of the future of this team.

There can be balance between planning ahead and playing for the present.

'better argument' is quite subjective, imo

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:32 am

Totally agree, CJ. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:03 pm

ALP - Since you have not provided one iota of fact or proof of what impact the Packers 2018 training camp or season will have on the future seasons of the Packers I will neither tip my hat or concede defeat. I maintain my position that the 2018 season is the only season that matters for now, as I posted. When 2019 gets here that will be the only season that matters and the same for 2020 and so on.

Just because you post or think that you have "won" a debate does not make it so, except for you of course. Beyond that this blog is not about winning or losing arguments, it's about discussing our views and supporting them with actual facts if they are available.

My points are as valid as yours and both our views are as valid as any other regardless of whether we agree or disagree. I posted that your position is fine, that doesn't mean you won or lost it is just a recognition that it is valid. You on the other hand just disrespectfully dismiss my post(s) and those of many others who disagree with you solely on the basis that you declare victory without any viable reasoning or information, other than "you're beat, tip you hat to the better argument".
Actually you have made no argument at all, because it is impossible for any us to know what 2018 will mean to the Packers future seasons.

If you don't believe that my posts or anyone else's posts deserve equal respect as yours than I would prefer that you no longer respond (to me) unless you intend to provide a respectful and informative discussion that actually contributes to the overall blog, rather than just declaring that you "won" and expecting the rest of us to "tip our hats" to your narcissistic but mythological genius.

You can tip you hat now. Until you are willing to engage an an adult, Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Andrew Lloyd Peth's picture

July 25, 2018 at 09:08 am

You're overreacting. I'm just saying if you invent strawman arguments--which you clearly did, as I never said winning now kills winning later--then you've given up debating the actual points being made by the one disagreeing with you.

So if you've given up and must create new arguments for that person, you should tip your hat to the better argument.

You're making this way too personal, '61.

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:11 am

Great post 61

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:32 am

Thank you White Tornado! Since '61

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:11 am

Great post 61

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 11:36 am

(Mostly) a great debate between 61 and ALP about “now” vs. “future”.
Each side has its merits.
The decision is well above my pay grade but it will be an interesting thing to follow.

(Actually, I don’t get paid anything by the NFL. It’s for entertainment purposes only.)

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:14 pm

TK - no doubt both sides has its merits. But like you it is above my pay grade to try to figure out what impact the Packers roster decisions over players like Allison, Davis, Yancey or the rookie WRs will have on future Packer seasons.

I'm focused on what the upcoming preseason evaluations will have on the 2018 season. I'm expecting the Packers to determine who are their best 53 players by the end of the preseason with the idea that these players give the Packers the best chance to win in 2018. How that affects future seasons who knows? When 2019 gets here I'll worry about it then and 2020 and so on. Concern about the future has its place but for me that comes after the current season is over.

I'll give you an example, in 2007 would I have traded a possible Super Bowl win in 2010 for the Packers to have won the SB in 2007. Hell no!!!
I want that Favre pick back. I want him to throw to his open RB not that wounded duck to Driver that resulted in an NY Giants OT victory.
However, in 2010 would I give up that SB victory for the 2007 Super Bowl or a future super bowl, again Hell NO!!! I'm a fan first, last and always.
Just win baby!!! Now and in the future. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 02:09 pm

Put me in on the play for now side! We have been in TT's we will be good in 5 years plan for 8 years, that hasnt worked out very well.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 03:14 pm

Absolutely!!! I'm still wondering what TT or the Packers have done with the cap money they never used for all those seasons. They certainly didn't use it to win and left us with Brett Hundley for 2017. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
Rak43's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:32 pm

The fact of the matter is that both of you are technically correct. Each and every NFL teams needs to do everything possible each year by going all out to acquire talent for their roster, yet must do so without sacrificing the future. Bill Belechik and Patriots do this better than any other team in the league. Their ability to continually acquire talent,overturn the roster and keep it competitive along with having a great defensive mind {Belechik} and Brady have kept them constantly in the AFC Championship game and consistently in the SB. And they do it without sacrificing the teams future.

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

July 24, 2018 at 07:44 pm

Sorry, but I generally skip over long posts.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 25, 2018 at 11:34 am

Don’t skip this one! (It’s brief.)

0 points
0
0
Bure9620's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:37 am

Since 61'
Yes Rodgers is picky about his recievers being in specific positions and gaining "trust." But I must say, how many young reicevers has Brady had to develop and play with that he maybe does not have full trust in? Latley, the Patriots have brought in more vets but Brady has had to develop chemistry with young pass catchers many times and does not have say as to whom they are, Belichick does. The Patriots typically do not shell out huge $ money for WRs either. Heck, Brady lost Gronk and still won the SB. Lost Edelman, and was still productive, Welker too. I think Rodgers just needs to be more open and more proactive in bringing young guys along and teaching them what he wants. I get a little annoyed when he makes perssonel comments like he is upset they let Jordy go or others. Its the NFL. That's leadership he's the best in the game he can make it work.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

July 24, 2018 at 10:09 am

I agree that Rodgers needs to work with the players he has. And he is professional enough to do that. Depending on how we measure it Rodgers is working with his 3rd or 4th receiving corps. I have no problem with Rodgers commenting on Jordy's departure. They were teammates for a long time, they remain friends, Jordy helped Rodgers make a ton of money and Rodgers is entitled to his opinions as is everyone else.

As for Brady and the Patriots, unless they are playing the Packers I could not care less about what they do or don't do. They are just another team in the league as far as I'm concerned. When they play the Packers I want the Packers win just like every other game against every other opponent.

As I posted, I just want the Packers to field the best 53 players they have whether or not that means adding new WRs or not. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:48 pm

Clearly, you need to work on your “Patriot envy”!
In previous years it was “Seahawk envy”, before that it was “49er envy”’...etc, etc.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:12 pm

I agree with ALP that Gute needs to keep an eye on 2019. I don't think keeping Allison over one of the rookies or Davis is significant for 2019. That might change depending on how folks play during the preseason.

Allison will be an RFA in 2019, so we have some control over him for 2 seasons. Not as good as having the player under contract, true.

0 points
0
0
Spock's picture

July 24, 2018 at 08:57 am

"Allison had seven catches on 12 targets on third and fourth down last year". Yeah, he didn't catch almost 50% of the passes that went his way. The year before he caught almost everything. I view Graham as the 3rd WR so we are really talking about the 4th receiver here and that makes me happy. If our biggest issue is who the 4th guy is at WR than it should be a good year!

0 points
0
0
DD's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:21 am

Let the games begin. Allison has a great opportunity. The holdover receivers do not. I think the young rookies drafted have great height and speed. Question is route running and learning to connect with Rodgers. Simple, but true. Ley the competition roll.

0 points
0
0
DD's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:23 am

Hard to tell with Hundley throwing. He should be gone by now. Rodgers will make any receiver look good.

0 points
0
0
PatrickGB's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:26 am

I see Clark and Davis as gone and what’s his name...Yancey gone as well. I also see Philbin as drawing up better plays so that the secret head nod get on the same page as Aaron plays are reduced. Better scheme and better players produce better results. Gmo has a cool name but does not have the skill to be a starter. At least two of the draft picks make the team because they are the future.

0 points
0
0
billybobton's picture

July 24, 2018 at 12:52 pm

As the years have gone by, various training camps and summer hero's one thing has become very true and fairly obvious.

MM is not a "highly successful NFL coach" because of his playbook, designs and brains, or leadership. In fact a good case can be made he is NOT a highly successful NFL coach. MM is a pretty interesting call. Is AROD because of, due to, the product of MM? If so then maybe MM is successful.

But his record outside AROD is not just bad it is dismal. His player comments and projects not remotely accurate. How many summer heros has MM raved about? and been correct?

How about his GURU status as a QB trainer? Was BH ready? Go back and read MM raving....RAVING about BH

Or was that power struggle?

Did MM throw BH under the bus KNOWING better but not having any alternative to getting rid of teddie?

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 02:29 pm

Better watch what you say on here about the Teflon coach. Somehow the wheels fell right off the bus last year but NONE of it was MM's fault. All blame slid right off.

I wish i was at the press conference when McCarthy stated that BH was not prepared to play. I would have asked:

Where were you when this was going on?
Dont you go to practice?
If you knew it was going on, why didnt you step in?
Why was Van Pelt retained that long if he was bad?
If you didnt know what was going on, why should you keep your job?

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:07 pm

I would love to hear your expert analysis of play calling performed by Mike McCarthy during the first half of the 2014 NFCCG. Please, play by play with data of actual Mike McCarthy call and what is really played, how many times Aaron changed the play at the LOS and with what efficiency...

Every time you spit on other person, you spitted twice at yourself...

And I would love to hear what you would say at Mike McCarthy position when he was pushed to "use" Brett Hundley...

I'm waiting your answers with excitement...

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:38 pm

Im not sure why you mention the NFCCG I've never mentioned it. If you are trying to say MM was masterful in the fiirst half I would tend to agree. However he was equally dreadful in the 2nd half.

IMO only MM is an average coach. He was lucky enough to catch lightning in a bottle with not 1 but 2 HOF QBS. Can any of you remember a game where MM lead the Packers to a victory over a superior opponent simply because he outcoached them? I can not however several games come to mind in the Mike Holmgren era.

I dont remember a player that was so misused in GB that he was JAG
Then watch him go to another team and earn pro bowl or allpro status.

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 04:42 pm

Sorry tried to edit but hit submit

Anyway Holmgren didnt sit back aand watch his former players earn probowl and allpro. I cant recall a bad coach on Holmgrens staff. Nolan Cromwell early on maybe? MM cant say that!

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

July 24, 2018 at 05:40 pm

Holmgrens is now coach in Canada, in CFL, Not in NFL. Maybe that tells you something more about how good coach he is...

Second, GM is responsible for roster not HC, so Mike McCarthy had to work with players provided by GM... No mention of that

Tell me what would you say to reporters about Brett Hundley, after his first game under center? Can you tell us that?

And, no, you did not answer to my questions, because you have no clue how to answer that. Those questions are placed by purpose, not just like that!

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 06:08 pm

So you are saying the GM failed to develop Heyward. Hyde and possibly Randall? It was the GM that placed them in the wtong position? Where do youget your logic from?

If I remember correctly, you were also telling everyone what a great job TT was doing. So just who was responsible? Was it the equipment manager? The groundskeeper? Or the guy at the will call ticket window?

What would I have said after BH first start? The words I have a lot of confidence in Brett Hundley would never come out of my mouth! I'd be afraid of being struck down by lightning for that lie.

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 06:13 pm

I can not find anywhere that says Holmgren is coaching in the CFL. Looks like youre as wrong about that as you have been on every other topic.

0 points
0
0
Demon's picture

July 24, 2018 at 06:21 pm

Yup you are wrong! Mike Sherman is coaching in the CFL NOT Mike Holmgren!

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

July 24, 2018 at 09:33 pm

I think Randall is TT's fault. GB had HHCD and had signed Burnett to big money, yet they drafted Randall. IIRC the scouts immediately identified as a CB rather than as a safety. What was MM/Capers to do? Not play a first round pick? So they moved him to CB, which Randall, in fact, can play reasonably well. MM has acknowledged that Randall played out of position due to team needs. Randall's attitude might be in part to realizing that he should be playing safety, and playing CB was hurting his career.

Hayward and Hyde are on MM and Capers.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

July 25, 2018 at 03:35 am

My bad. Holmgren would be to old for coaching... You are right, it is Sherman!

And you still do not answer my direct question: What would you say to media after the first Brett Hundley game as starter?

Answer that my friend...

And regarding TT. I'm still that he is (or was) one of the best in the business. That means that he is allowed to have some mistakes. There is no mistake free man in the history. Start from yourself and you'll find that this is truth...

0 points
0
0
LayingTheLawe's picture

July 25, 2018 at 07:00 pm

In sports you are what your record says you are. So McCarthy is a Super Bowl winning coach who has an amazing winning percentage in the regular season. You have to live with that.

Its like trying to argue the Phil Jackson is not actually a good coach at all and was just the lucky recipient of coaching the teams that had Michael Jordan, Shaquille O'Neal and Kobe Bryant on them. In the end he won so you can't win that argument.

So is the coach the chicken or the egg in making a team great?

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

July 24, 2018 at 03:58 pm

I believe Geronimo Allison is nice young fellow. Good teammate. Hard working person.

And, he get specific name, many in Packers nation love.

I will state again. Nice name will not win any game for Packers.

I'm fan of Packers. i'm not fan of this or that player. I'm fan of all packers players, while they are playing for Packers. When player leave Packers I'm thankful for his effort to make team I'm fan of better... That is all...

So, at this moment I have 90 players I'm cheering for them (each and any). But who will stay, and who will go, I decide to let decision to people who 1. knows football much better than me, 2. knows how to estimate players much better than me and 3. will have to be responsible for the result made with players they picked up at the end of the TC.

Thank you!

0 points
0
0
jww061356's picture

July 24, 2018 at 05:02 pm

I like to think 3 tall fast wideouts=1 impact WR by the end of the year. I have no basis for this, it's just my feeling. And I think at the very least Brown, who attended Notre Dame, will have the smarts to learn the system and be a factor before the year is out.

0 points
0
0
LayingTheLawe's picture

July 25, 2018 at 07:23 pm

Equanimeous Tristan Imhotep J. St. Brown was a top student in school and speaks three languages so being intelligent is not an issue. We will hope it translates into knowing where he's supposed to be specially when the play breaks down and Rodgers is on the move. Brown had a really poor season last year after a good sophomore year so we will have to watch what he can do at this level.

0 points
0
0
4thand10's picture

July 25, 2018 at 12:51 am

I’m excited to see what or if Geronimo can improve . I like calling out his name after a good play when we’re twittering. I also want to see Davis improve his special teams and emergency wr fill in game...he does have some speed and jukes. Really excited to see AR returning while simultaneously wondering if I should take Jimmy Graham on my fanasty team this year. And I’m also excited about what Mercedes Lewis will do....he is an all around true tight end....canblock chip, catch etc. But this Pettine defense has really got me excited.

0 points
0
0
LayingTheLawe's picture

July 25, 2018 at 06:56 pm

As always in Packer camp the loudest, most fierce arguments will center around who are the backup receivers. Every season there is someone who gets vehement discussion back and forth with people convinced he is a future hall of famer while the other posters are just as vehemently sure he is a future insurance salesman.

Not a single one of these players have ever turned around and amounted to anything showing the argument was all just summer steam being blown off over a fringe NFL level player.

This season the stakes are higher because the argument will be about the number 3 and 4 receivers. And these are people who project to see a lot of playing time. My hope is Allison is on the team but as a number 5 or 6 receiver because some other promising players have usurped him.

As a bodybuilder I have a fondness for the son of the profoundly weird and great Ron Brown and hope he makes the team. Besides how can you not root for a kid who can speak three languages fluently and has a full name of Equanimeous Tristan Imhotep J. St. Brown? But he needs to prove it on the field and show he can be where Rodgers wants him to be or he can go back to Cali and lift weights with his dad.

0 points
0
0
LayingTheLawe's picture

July 25, 2018 at 07:17 pm

Now actually Graham will line up outside way more than he will be an in line tight end so he is really the number three receiver on this team. So does that make anyone feel better that what we are discussing is who will emerge as the number 4 receiver?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

July 25, 2018 at 07:26 pm

Arguably the #5, then, given how ARod looked for #88 in his games a year ago. Just gotta find a way to keep Montgomery healthy.

0 points
0
0