Cory's Corner: Finding The Right OL Fit

There are plenty of pieces to be used on the offensive line, the question is how they all fit together. 

The Packers are firm believers that the five best offensive linemen will play.

What does it mean when it comes to the most important position on the line? Last year, Rasheed Walker started all 17 games at left tackle and finished as the third-best pass blocker behind Elgton Jenkins and Zach Tom. The problem is, he was one of the team’s worst run-blockers — just above seldom-used tight Ben Sims. 

That’s where Jordan Morgan comes in. He was drafted 25th overall in the 2024 NFL Draft with aspirations of potentially being the Packers next cornerstone piece at left tackle. However, thanks to nagging shoulder issues, he only appeared in six games and made only one start. 

With Organized Team Activities starting this week, this is a great time to see how much shuffling will be made on an offensive line that was already pretty solid. After being limited for a long time last year, will Morgan’s feet be quick enough to sustain a pass rush on the outside?

“Just the way he runs off the ball, his athleticism, just being able to mirror guys,” said Packers offensive line coach Luke Butkus last summer. “Just the way he glides and moves on the field.”

And that is why the Packers took Morgan in the first round. On the back of his football card, it says 6-foot-5, 311 pounds, but he isn’t a run-of-the-mill 300-pound man. He ran the 40-yard dash in 5.05 seconds, which means he has the speed to get downfield for second-level blocks on screens and swing passes. 

“We didn’t see him much at tackle, which is obviously what he played in college and what he was drafted as,” said Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst after last season. 

If Morgan wins the left tackle job, Walker can move inside. And with Elgton Jenkins already poised to move to center, the offensive line is starting to look like musical chairs. With free agent Aaron Banks already locked into one guard spot, that just leaves how the Packers will assemble them. 

Finding the best group of offensive linemen that not only block well is important but it’s also important to find a cohesive unit that plays well together.

Lots of people like what they see from Morgan. He has the intangibles like speed and athleticism to be very successful. The question is if he can add to the offensive line group and make this team even stronger. That’s something that is hard to predict, especially when there isn’t much hitting in practice anymore. 

Zach Tom is the team’s best offensive lineman, but it appears that he will be staying at right tackle — even though I still think he would be very appealing at left tackle. 

There are so many combinations that could fit, but that’s what makes Packers coach Matt LaFleur’s and Butkus’ job so difficult — nailing down the right combination to fit with everyone else. 

In order for this team to succeed, it will take the big guys up front to take the main stage. Just how and where they fit is a different story. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (30)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
TKWorldWide's picture

May 27, 2025 at 06:49 am

I still suffer from the bias that comes from Morgan being a first and Walker a 7th. But admitting it is the first step, I think.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

May 27, 2025 at 06:55 am

"The bright shiny object" has again been put out there. Simply because Morgan is a first-round pick he must be better than R. Walker. Not necessarily.
All Walker has done is do a better than average job of protecting the $50 million quarterback. Most scouts didn't like Morgan as a tackle. Walker is a FA after this season and will most likely be gone. They can't pay Zach Tom and Walker. Rhyan is also a free agent after this year and could get a good offer. Enter Morgan. He and Tom will make up the right side in 2026, Belton and Banks on the left side. Big guys.

Always remember Gute drafts a year in advance.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

May 27, 2025 at 12:08 pm

"Always remember Gute drafts a year in advance."

That won't be true if Morgan can't handle the LT spot. It certainly wasn't true at center last year when the draft class had great depth early.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

May 27, 2025 at 06:57 am

"If Morgan wins the left tackle job, Walker can move inside."

Walker pass-blocks well as a left tackle and struggles with run blocking. It makes no sense to play him at guard--a position he's never played. If he loses out to Morgan, he will be the swing tackle, backing up both tackle positions.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

May 27, 2025 at 08:24 am

If he is not a LT for the Packers, Walker will be a LT somewhere else.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

May 27, 2025 at 09:05 am

Even if Morgan beats him out at left tackle, I don't think they would trade Walker unless another swing tackle emerges during training camp, like maybe if Belton plays really well. That doesn't seem likely to me though. They need depth on the O-line this year. If Walker leaves in free agency next year, they will get a compensatory draft pick.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 27, 2025 at 08:58 am

I agree. I think guards are more likely burly run blockers than dancing bear left tackles and that’s not Walker.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

May 27, 2025 at 07:10 am

Walker is a two year starter and a very good pass protector which is job one for a LT. Morgan has played six games in the NFL. How about we see what happens in training camp before we award the left tackle job to Morgan?

The scouting report on Walker coming out of college was that his run blocking was good during a two year stint as starting LT for Penn State. Not sure why the run blocking has fallen off so much in Green Bay, but he got it done while playing a tough schedule at Penn State. I'm sure he knows he needs to run block better to have a shot at a second contract with the Packers. I wouldn't give his position at LT away just yet.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

May 27, 2025 at 07:16 am

I don't feel Walker is a problem.
The problem has been injuries, and a off-kilter line.
I get the group goal is to protect Love.
So lets not reward the player for standing out
Because of draft status, salary, or ability.
Play action or a sound running game is key.
But who protects Love the best.
Must be given preference.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

May 27, 2025 at 11:38 am

"The problem has been injuries, and a off-kilter line."

They had the healthiest line in the league last year. The problem was talent and depth. They were a little short of both.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

May 27, 2025 at 07:43 am

All that matters is the line. It did ok last season. As we've seen "ok" doesn't cut it most of the time especially against playoff caliber teams and in the division. I think you can get away with "ok" everywhere else BUT the lines on O and D.

Without watching these guys in camp and preseason (are the starters going to work together besides joint practices?) I'm not good enough to project my best 5 or where they're going to start. All I know and have confidence in is we have a better group on paper to start with than last season.

We HAVE to get better. We can't assume the other teams aren't or that we can just keep pace with them and still take a step forward.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

May 27, 2025 at 08:14 am

You can't get away with "ok" everywhere else except the lines. If you want to win a championship, you need to be more than "ok" at most positions. It's even possible for good players at the offensive skill positions to compensate for an O-line that is just "ok." I wouldn't want to try winning a championship that way, but it's not out of the question. I'm glad the Packers are trying to upgrade a unit that was pretty good last year.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

May 27, 2025 at 08:24 am

I don't think you can sustain anything with great skill position players without great lines against playoff caliber teams. We've proven this year in and year out.

Start with the lines then worry about the rest. I could have said "might get away" or "more likely to get away with", but the O-line part stands.

0 points
0
0
Ya_tittle's picture

May 27, 2025 at 10:11 am

I think Gute saw how the Eagles OL and DL dominated in the Super Bowl and is mimicking their approach to a championship.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 27, 2025 at 12:47 pm

Maybe. But football has ALWAYS been about the lines. There are hieroglyphics in caves touting the importance of the lines from way back in history.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

May 27, 2025 at 01:17 pm

That cave was my childhood bedroom.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

May 27, 2025 at 08:53 am

What makes my eyes roll is that this team still hasn't got a clue as to who can play where and at a level that not only dominates the position for the team, but against the better opponents. If Tom is the most dominant guy on this OL, this team is in trouble, again.

Start the music as the musical chair game begins yet again for the starter role selection, and that means a too steep of a drop from starter to back up, or a mediocre group of backups that get chances to start, somewhere, anywhere on the OL, at any given time.

I ask again, which players are secure in their positions that they are not required to play the musical chair game?

Sure, being able to play multiple positions is a benefit, but that player needs to be a dominant player in at least one, and not fighting to be another utility bench guy, which this team seems to have many.

I know, but I want this team to get better than good, as good doesn't seem to have a standard that is adhered to, and has proven to be far too less than other teams.

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2025 at 09:26 am

You have the expertise to say who is the best lineman, thinking the way you do about Tom?

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

May 27, 2025 at 10:09 am

Do you have the expertise to say what you think?

It's been said here by many that nobody here has the expertise, but we all have our opinions, right or wrong, agree or disagree.

I don't believe I ever asked someone this question, I just offer an opinion, whether in agreement or disagreement.

I wait until the team decides, and then I weigh in on a weekly basis of their play. At the moment, not one player is locked into an OL position, and that worries me, as it should you, and the others.

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2025 at 10:47 am

Point is you are judging others, do you play pro ball or ever did or coaching experience? All is I am saying.

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

May 27, 2025 at 11:44 am

TE is judging players on past performance. Tom was a total liability against the Eagles in the wildcard loss. Did their d-coordinator expose a huge flaw in Tom's game? If he did, others will surely exploit that too. Banks played poorly for the Niners after Williams went down. Why the Packers believe they can get him to play better with Walker or Morgan next to him is interesting to say the least. The carousel at right guard demonstrates a lack of the coaches knowing which player is the best. Jenkins played well at center a few years ago, but his last stint against the Lions went badly. Which Jenkins will show up at center this year?
Of course, with all your NFL playing/coaching experience, you can ignore these things and lambaste everyone that doesn't.

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2025 at 12:20 pm

So that means as common fans we know more than coaches who should play where? That is the whole point of my post, who as a fan are weto judge?

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

May 27, 2025 at 02:16 pm

I don't know about anyone else but me. I am a fan that will always judge the team on its play. I would hope that even a "common fan" (whatever that means) is able to know good play from bad play. If the Packers aren't able to contend for the Super Bowl, I will judge the team for its failings. The coaching, o-line, d-line, cb wr or qb play. All these positions and coaching need to perform better for the Packers to contend for a Super Bowl. You can call it judgemental, I call it a fact.
I was fortunate to be a young fan (11 years) when Lombardi became the Packers head coach. That has given me the highest expectations for the team I have chosen to follow for these 65 years. It's Super Bowl or failure. Just making the playoffs most years isn't good enough in my judgement.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

May 27, 2025 at 11:56 am

Regardless of the topic, or person being discussed, everything said is a judgment of that topic or person. My opinion is based on what I know about the game and what I see watching it played. My opinion grows stronger based on happenings derived from the results that lend a credence to my opinions.

Prescott is the highest paid QB, should I automatically agree that he must be the best QB in the league? Do you disagree or agree? Either answer has you projecting a judgment/ opinion.

If everyone has to have played or coached a sport, then what are the fans cheering and screaming about.

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2025 at 12:17 pm

I don't judge players, they do their best can't ask for more is fine with me.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

May 27, 2025 at 12:41 pm

Yes, you are judging them, as your defense of them is a judgment.

How do you know they're doing their best? Why do many players play worst after getting paid? How do you know if a player isn't checking out in a game because he's pissed about something? You seem to believe that everything is on the up and up. Well, good luck with that

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

May 27, 2025 at 01:07 pm

How do you they are not?

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

May 27, 2025 at 01:26 pm

I don't know for a fact, and that's why it's an opinion/judgment based on what I see, read and interpret it to be. I'm always more than happy to have a change in that opinion, if warranted.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 27, 2025 at 09:14 am

Walker is a near elite pass protector. PFF had him as the 21st best in the league among all tackles. He’s not been a good run blocker, though he did improve as the season went on.

That’s something that can be changed. It’s something that, for the most part has been a signature of our whole OL. The emphasis was always on pass pro. That seems to be changing now. So Walker is on notice of where he needs to improve.

The mystery to me is why Walker has not been good in the run game. We see the ability to move from his pass pro. He’s not a weak man: coming out he had recorded a 350-pound clean, a 400-pound bench press, and a 580-pound squat. He can and has made very good plays in the run game, it’s just that he isn’t consistent at all. Add that all up and it screams coaching emphasis to me.

I understand the cap pressures. I do not mind if Morgan genuinely wins out, but he’s going to have to take a huge step to match Walker’s pass pro. It’s worth noting that Morgan was decidedly worse at run blocking as a G last year than he was at pass pro. His overall run grade was only minimally higher than Walker’s per PFF.

Both were better than Myers. Even Rhyan and Jenkins followed the same pattern: pass ratings significantly above run grade. The strong suggestion is this is at least as much coaching as player acumen.

Maybe Morgan will get close to Walker in the pass game, but that’s asking a lot. Since his run grade last year was near equivalent, he should need to push very hard on both counts. It’s a fallacy to believe he’s shown more in the run game than Walker at this point. The run game was not Morgan’s forte in college.

Unless Morgan does stand out as a run blocker suddenly and markedly over that of Walker, realistically, what Walk has achieved in the passing game over numerous games probably means he should and will start. As I have said, I can’t see any reason why Walker can’t improve his run game: unlike Morgan, it was a positive aspect of his in college.

If Walker is the better player, he should play. Rational teams do not compromise at LT. That is true even if Morgan ends up being a starting T next year as long as this season is alive for us. However, if Walker does leave, why would we not shift Tom, who played there in college? He is our best T and will be paid as such.

The bigger picture here is that it’s not just the players: it’s coaching. Butkus has to step up as much as any individual. When every player is significantly weaker in the run game and some, like Rhyan and Walker were thought to be the opposite when drafted, then the spotlight has to be on the coaching: emphasis and technique both.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

May 27, 2025 at 11:51 am

Morgan needs to be left at tackle unless they think Belton is ready to play RT this year. Let Walker and Morgan compete for LT while both also take a few 2nd team snaps at RT so whoever loses the battle is ready to be the swing T. Morgan played exclusively at LT his last three years in college while Walker played all of 29 snaps at RT in his last three years at Penn State and Belton played 11. Tom is their best lineman and hopefully stays healthy but if he misses time it could be a disaster without getting one or two of those guys some practice reps there.

Walker was a better run blocker as a rookie than he was last year so maybe he was dealing with some bumps and bruises that limited his effectiveness

Over the last 5 years the Packers were 9th overall in rushing yards before contact but going by season they were 4th, 21st, 6th, 17th and 18th. They have to better than 18th if they want to continue to run the ball as much as they did last year. Jacobs can't be expected to be Superman after contact for 300 attempts like he was last year. Not surprisingly the Eagles were 1st in three of the last five seasons.

https://x.com/Ihartitz/status/1927056183442968753?t=1Lpk4iyHryERA9zrjjt0...

0 points
0
0