Cory's Corner: Clay Matthews must move back inside

It’s time for Clay Matthews to move back to inside linebacker.

With Jake Ryan out with an ankle injury, either Blake Martinez or Joe Thomas will be forced to play every defensive snap because the Packers are so thin at inside linebacker.

It’s also time to preserve Matthews’ career. At outside linebacker, Matthews always goes 100 miles an hour and tries to get around or seal the edge. And in doing so, he gets nicked up. The Packers have played nine games this year, but he’s only played five.

Think of it like a catcher moving to first base or designated hitter. His body takes a lot more abuse on the outside than the inside and at inside he can give some needed help at stopping the run, which was gashed for 154 yards last week.

Matthews turns 31 in May. The hamstring injuries have begun to mount and aren’t going away. He’s on pace to have the worst season of his career.

Last year, Matthews was asked to play a hybrid position where he floated between inside and outside linebacker. He was a defensive amoeba that made offensive coordinators locate Matthews first.

The downside is that Nick Perry will suffer. Ever since Matthews has been sidelined, Perry has been invisible. Perry has a ½ sack and 5 tackles in the last three games. Perry’s free agent value went from top dollar to Family Dollar in a matter of weeks. Even though Matthews and Perry have a great statistical symbiotic relationship, Matthews doesn’t need to prop him up.

The defense also needs a veteran voice. Ever since Sam Shields suffered a concussion in Week 1, combined with the injury loss of Matthews, the Packers have sorely missed leadership. There isn’t a better place to lead on defense than from the defensive quarterback position. Matthews has to realize that he’s playing with five defensive starters with one or two years of experience. Even if he cannot make any “splash” plays, he needs to get this defense back on track with his leadership.

The question comes down to Matthews. He was praised for making the switch last year. Will he do it again? Obviously his statistics will suffer, but this is a move to reverse course and string some wins together.

Matthews is only 4 sacks from tying Kabeer Gbaja-Biamila’s career franchise record of 74½ sacks. He’s ahead of Reggie White and Tim Harris. He now has to focus on team goals.

That likely makes personal stats tougher to come by, but it will continue to make Green Bay a destination. It will show potential free agents that veterans don’t have a problem conceding stats to youngsters as long as winning is the highest priority.

The Packers are a 4-5 team that played last week without nine of their Week 1 starters. That’s approaching plague-like status.

Matthews can make everyone forget all of the craziness surrounding Aaron Rodgers, Mike McCarthy and the rash of injuries by being the consummate pro and doing his job. If he plays well and fills a void in a tight spot, the Packers will rally around their long-locked linebacker. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (30)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
stockholder's picture

November 19, 2016 at 07:20 am

I agree. Thomas has no business on this team. Mc Cray should have been kept. The LBs have been nothing but TTs revolving door. Perry, Mathews, Ryan , and Jones, are what makes this defense better. Their the leadership the defensive Line needs behind them. Move Mathews back. Moss keeps playing favorites. I have had enough of Moss. It's obvious his toying/toys, are not making the jump. If the Packers want to correct any mistakes, it starts with Mathews. I want to win! It's to late for Experiments.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 19, 2016 at 09:03 am

Can someone look up the PFF grades on Martinez, Thomas, and Ryan? I just don't think those players are tremendously different overall. I would really like to know how my perceptions meet those flawed rankings...

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

November 19, 2016 at 07:24 am

I agreed it's become clear he can't stay healthy outside. At least if he plays the hybrid role he can be on the field more and be used judiciously on the outside.

0 points
0
0
carusotrap's picture

November 19, 2016 at 08:32 am

One of his best seasons was last year playing inside. I could never understand the "Clay HAS to be.moved back to his natural position outside" argument. How 'bout he plays where he's told? I know...insanity.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

November 19, 2016 at 08:40 am

"The question comes down to Matthews. He was praised for making the switch last year. Will he do it again? Obviously his statistics will suffer, but this is a move to reverse course and string some wins together."

HUH??

Matthews stats have already began to suffer. He has 3 sacks in what, 6 games? Morgan Burnett has 3 sacks too, in 8 games but still. Matter of fact Frackrell has as many tackles as Matthews and 2 sacks himself. Frackrell might not be ready for a "Fulltime Role" but I think he could handle increased snaps no problem. Afterall, Thompson drafted the kid with one eye on next season anyways, may as well get him some more time.

I posted a comment on another story earlier this morning suggesting this very thing. Matthews best position at this point in his career IS ILB. He played the position extremely well for 1 1/2 seasons before moving back this year. He literally saved the Packers in 2014 when he moved inside. Offenses just have a harder time with Matthews when he's coming from multiple places opposed to just the left or right side. Cory's right on the money, move CMIII back inside. The pass defense has looked a lot like 2011 when they finished last in passing yards allowed. The difference is they had 31 interceptions in 2011, this year they have 7 so far. Not to mention the defense has given up 33, 31, and 47 points. What harm could it possibly do?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 19, 2016 at 08:56 am

"Matthews stats have already began to suffer. He has 3 sacks in what, 6 games? "

Actually, he's only played about 4 games. He lost a significant portion of 2 by being hurt or limited in-game. Splitting hairs, I know, but during a big chunk of that, Perry was logging the bulk of his stats. In the end, I don't care who gets to the QB as long as someone does. The Packers are better equipped to get to the QB with #52 on the field.

"Offenses just have a harder time with Matthews when he's coming from multiple places opposed to just the left or right side."

This is the key statement, right here. He has the physical attributes, when healthy, to play a huge number of spots in the front 7. That puts a tremendous amount of pressure on an offense to identify him and what the defense is planning to do. I actually see Ryan's injury as an opportunity for this defense assuming CMIII is close to full strength.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

November 19, 2016 at 08:41 am

This teams issues go beyond where Matthews plays and if wins and losses are being solely pinned to this point, don't expect much better seasons to be played better, much less the remainder of this one, as Matthews will be seen less and less. Cut our losses via dependence on one, trade him for a 1+ draft pick while still possible and erase the collapse that is soon coming of Matthews.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 19, 2016 at 09:00 am

This is an assessment that always needs to be made, especially on a player that costs so much of your cap: are you getting the return you need from that player? If he was only making $5M, I think we would still like to see better play (and better health), but we would be more forgiving. The bottom line is that this team has nothing close to him and his skill set. Maybe Fackrell can be that guy some day, but he's not that player now and he needs to bulk up to play the run (teams are just running over him at this point) to get there. That's a slow process.

0 points
0
0
TarynsEyes's picture

November 19, 2016 at 09:21 am

" The bottom line is that this team has nothing close to him and his skill set. Maybe Fackrell can be that guy some day, but he's not that player now and he needs to bulk up to play the run (teams are just running over him at this point) to get there. That's a slow process."

Cannot disagree...but the opportunity to get more than a player is worth long term for you from another closes fast. Sure Fackrell needs a little more time and strength and will not be the Matthews of youth and neither is Matthews regardless of position placed.
It's obvious the defense needs more than a weekly infusion of hope that one can play better and that process should start asap or the day this teams season is officially over...which will be closer if a loss to Washington this Sunday even with the long haired, overly relied upon, oft hurt icon of yesteryear.

0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

November 19, 2016 at 10:02 am

Cory,I agree, with 2 years left on Mathews $66 mil contract playing Clay at ILB may keep him healthy,the defense seems better and GB could at least get their money's worth out of him. Suddenly he is 30 years old and his best playing days are are showing up in the rearview mirror and the way it is looking this season they don't have much to lose,put your best players on the field and use TT' S draft and develop philosophy and get these young players some reps to find out what they have down the road,the pass rush has been dismal anyway and TT has been rebuilding that defense for years and it's still full of holes and with Ryan out for who knows how long Mathews making the calls at ILB makes sense.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 19, 2016 at 07:19 pm

Why is it that if a player is over 30** He is over paid and prone to injuries? Peppers, Woodson, and several ex-players are "still/were" playing better than TTs draft and develop philosophy. I never wanted a fantasy football team. And the 3 years its taking, seems like their short changing the fans. The veterans are smarter and don't make stupid mistakes. Your judging a player on speed more than scheme. Or an injury that effects even players that show signs of promise. (Such as Randall and Hayward come to mind. ) So far, if a veteran player has talent, he's quickly picked up by other teams for that missing part. But what most people should be looking at is; How Much Do they Have in The Tank. WE have become a team that has a "Use em up mentality". NEXT MAN PLEASE. Rocky Where are you! I don't mind if they were never an All-pro. But I still see are All-pros doing some good on other teams. Rebuilding is not going to give you instant All-Pros. So why try to say they can't do their job and sweep them under the rug. As I watch the packers struggle back to .500. I wonder if they should not be traded. Yes I'm referring to A-Rod here. Hell we traded a Hall of Fame QB in Farve. (Yes A-rod was ready!) Defense was not the issue. It is now. Until we have another Mathews or A-rod were stuck. Why does this team not have another charles Woodson, Nick Collins, or even Tramon Williams? This team looked so promising before the season. TT should be held accountable! Please compare super bowl players. And your eyes open. He spent 1st rd. draft picks on the DL. BUT In the years we won the super-bowl . Reggie White, and company. Pickett and Woodson. came from other teams. I'd keep Mathews and ask TT to retire. TT wrecked the blue print for winning teams. The key was getting Defensive Lineman from other teams. Steal the difference maker. Draft the best player that fits. Not experiments. And it sure the heck was not next man up.

0 points
0
0
marpag1's picture

November 19, 2016 at 05:13 pm

“And it sure the heck was not next man up.”

2010

Starting RB Ryan Grant is injured in the first game and goes to IR. Next man up: James Starks, rookie, drafted by the Packers.

Starting ILB Nick Barnett is injured in the fourth game and goes to IR. Next man up: Desmond Bishop, fourth year player, drafted by the Packers.

Starting TE Jermichael Finley is injured in the fifth game and goes to IR. Next man up: Andrew Quarless, rookie, drafted by the Packers.

Starting RT Mark Tauscher is injured in the fourth game and goes to IR. Next man up: Bryan Bulaga, rookie, drafted by the Packers.

2010 Free agents signed from other teams: None.

2010 Free agents lost to other teams: OLB Aaron Kampman (2x pro bowler), RBs Ahman Green (4x pro bowler, 2003 NFC Offensive Player of the Year) and DeShawn Wynn, P Jeremy Kapinos.

RESULT: Super Bowl victory

PS - "Travis Williams" was a running back who played for the Packers from 1967 to 1970... unless you meant the Travis Williams who was a LB for Atlanta in 2007 or the other Travis Williams who played four games for the Evansville Crimson Giants in 1921 and 1922.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 19, 2016 at 07:46 pm

I fixed Tramon Williams for you. Nice paragraph to fix my type o. You made me laugh. No one thought the packers would win it in 2010. But I did. It wasn't the BACK - UPS or their draft and Developement policy . It was a secondary that was tight with the leadership of woodson and Collins. The 2010 packers should have won more. Bishop was never replaced. Barnett was a penalty waiting to happen. But Woodson was a picked up Veteran. I'm just saying that you never give up on ALL -Pros. Unless they've given up on the packers and want out. (Money) Now explain why it's been 6 years? Where's your next man up?

0 points
0
0
calabasa's picture

November 19, 2016 at 08:53 am

He needs to move back inside...the white lines. At this point I don't care where he's assigned. Quickly becoming an unreliable non-factor, unfortunately.

0 points
0
0
EdsLaces's picture

November 19, 2016 at 09:11 am

Yeah gonna have do definitely disagree with this idea. Being in the "middle" is much more dangerous than being on the outside.

0 points
0
0
Denise Chanterelle's picture

November 19, 2016 at 11:56 am

Was Clay a roid user? Guess we'll never really know , but his play has been on the decline ever since that story broke, and he has become more injury prone. Paying that guy a ton of $. Let's hope he earns it once back out on the field, and stays there this time. Still time for Clay, AR, (these 2 are the face of the franchise), and rest of the team to turn this season around. NFC North is up for grabs right now; nobody seems to want it! Packers must win tomorrow. Go Pack!

0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

November 19, 2016 at 12:34 pm

"potential free agents" .... This is funny.

Inside or outside, wherever, --CM3 better make himself a key part of a GB resurgence this season or he may be playing on the West Coast or East Coast in 2017. --- He's 31 and cost too much $$$$.

0 points
0
0
Slim11's picture

November 19, 2016 at 12:59 pm

All the comments above supported my observation, in another thread, that Matthews is more effective at ILB AND less injury-prone at the same time.

He can pass rush from inside and has done so in the past. Perry might become less effective, but some adjustments have to be made to increase his effectiveness.

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

November 19, 2016 at 02:11 pm

Is Carl Bradford on the practice squad? Wasn't he tearing it up in camp and the pre season? I think even MM spoke highly of him.

0 points
0
0
al bundy's picture

November 19, 2016 at 03:33 pm

They wnt let himplay in the middle where I think ahe shouldnhave always played. Ted dont draft de's because the good ones have huge salaries so he uses linbackers instead. Mathews is the pass rush.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 19, 2016 at 08:34 pm

What? In the 3-4, the primary pass rushers are OLBs. Not DEs.

0 points
0
0
al bundy's picture

November 19, 2016 at 03:43 pm

One good thng it exposes Perry as a no body. At usc he plyed next to top talent who made him look better than he was. He was considered a late second pick by analyst and has done zip until this, his contract year. Another busg takng up space alhg with datone.

0 points
0
0
gary's picture

November 19, 2016 at 04:23 pm

TT and his unbalanced roster,his lack of using free agency,piss me off so much. The pack could have signed Bennett for less then 3 miilion. We would have a real TE at this point.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

November 19, 2016 at 09:00 pm

I agree that CM3 simply was not very good at ILB. Guess I don't think he is a world beater at OLB either but is still above average there.

Not sure whether Cory meant CM3 should move to ILB long-term or just until Ryan returns. I am fine with it just for a few games. If Perry misses Matthews, that doesn't say much for Peppers, Datone and Elliott.

BTW, CM3 isn't worth $15.2M next year or $11.4M in 2018 no matter where he plays, assuming he managed to find the field with more regularity.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

November 19, 2016 at 09:54 pm

GB promoted Bradford from the PS to the 53. I am fine with that, but it seems that being on the practice squad doesn't mean a player is ready to actually go. It seems to mean that Bradford got no practice reps with the starters.

Strangely enough, GB waived Perillo to make room for Bradford. I guess that means TT preferred Joe Kerridge over Perillo. I've never understood GB's evaluations on so many players. Kerridge must be our new Special Teams ace.

0 points
0
0
PETER MAIZ's picture

November 20, 2016 at 01:24 am

Why are the Packers always "thin" at several positions? It seems that the team has cratered both on the field and in the locker room.

0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

November 20, 2016 at 07:30 am

They are thin at those positions so they can carry 7 WR's and 4 of those are barely used yet MM lines up R Rodgers at WR like he's thin there. This makes sense?

0 points
0
0
Donster's picture

November 20, 2016 at 06:19 am

I guess Matthews will continue to play outside where he wants to play since yesterday the Pack waived Perillo to make room for Bradford. Don't know why Matthews can't move back inside. Is he not able to understand he played better there and had less injury issues? I guess he is one of TT's pets and doesn't want him to not get what he wants. Trade him after the season and get something for him while you can. If TT is still around, don't pull a Sitton with Matthews. Or get a 5th or 6th rounder for him so TT can "draft and develop" someone like a former basketball player that played one year of college football and is one of those "best athletes available". The Packers have enough of those that haven't produced. Might be a great athlete, but if they are as bright as a small appliance bulb, they just aren't NFL material.

0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

November 20, 2016 at 07:38 am

That's how TT(Tightwad Ted) operates, he passed on a couple of big name CB's in the draft and picked Randall and Rollins, never heard mention of them until GB picked them 1&2

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 20, 2016 at 08:01 am

TT is a rock Star. You make yourself look great with 1 great thing. Then come up with 12 bad things to make it look better. I am still wondering why perrillo. Has Sandland improved that much? (IF so put him on the 53.) Bradford was on the PS 2 years. What has joe Kerridge done? Elliott? 7WRs? The Desmond Bishop replacement continues.

0 points
0
0