Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Getting Down with the Upside.

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

Well, we have our initial 2023 Packers Roster, and across the decisions they made that might raise an eyebrow or two, there was one predominant theme - UPSIDE. The Packers are clearly building for the future over the current. That doesn't mean they aren't trying to win in 2023 - they most certainly are. But they're going to do it with players that show the potential to be something special in the future instead of those players good enough to make rosters and hold down a spot, but never good enough to be real impact players. The Packers are all-in on YOUTH, UPSIDE and POTENTIAL.

While assuming this was the case after the draft, it became clearer when they eschewed signing a veteran wide receiver to the room. Then what solidified it for me was when Tyler Davis went down and they didn't bring in a TE. The rookies will get the snaps. Players that have been with the Packers but failed to distinguish themselves have been sent to the sidelines. Shemar Jean-Charles, Innis Gaines, Tyler Goodson, Patrick Taylor, Pat O'Donnell, etc.

 

 

I ended up with 49 correct on my roster prediction, a total reached by10 others, in the Packers' twitterverse, but surpassed only by our own Wendell Ferreira, who clocked in with 50 correct.

My prediction highlights: Whelan over O'Donnell, as few had this right. Also, getting the S, DL, WR and OL group exact (except for Tenuta technically, who will be IR'd today) Keeping Jonathan Ford. Brenton Cox making the team, Tarvarius Moore cut. Royce Newman - to me was a pretty sure thing (sorry). 

My Prediction lowlights: I struggled the most with the defense and it showed. I couldn't fathom only four CBs, making me keep so-so players  like Shemar Jean-Charles and Innis Gaines on the roster. I couldn't fathom 6 EDGE rushers, so I cut Hollins against my own wishes. 

The Packers keeping only 4 cornerbacks is a bit of a shocker to me. I know that Savage can play the slot if needed, but I'm thinking the Packers must be counting on a disruptive pass rush and also planning on a lot less dime, with how good Quay Walker is in coverage. The backup CBs are usually key special team contributors, as well. This is risky.

The wide receiver group consists of 3 rookies and three second-year players. Has this ever been done?

22 of the Packers' last 24 draft picks are on this team. Six are sure starters, 9 figure to be game day contributors, the rest are purely in a backup role for now.

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
15 points
 

Comments (153)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
EnemyTerritory's picture

August 30, 2023 at 06:19 am

Let the real games begin. A season of seasoning. A season of potential disaster or of potential hope. The organization has reloaded. Let’s hope they chose live rounds and not blanks. Game one will continue the ownership of the Bears. The playoffs are not out of the question imho at 9-8 wildcard

7 points
7
0
Cheezehead72's picture

August 30, 2023 at 06:23 am

I predict 5 or 6 wins and I do not care because I am going to enjoy watching my Packers play now the Rodgers is gone. We are back to the Green Bay Packers not the Aaron Rodgers Packers.

3 points
13.5
10.5
coolhand's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:52 am

It's tough when you lose your GM, head coach, and starting QB all at the same time, but the Packers will survive!

-1 points
5
6
Bitternotsour's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:13 am

nice. they also lost their nominal team president. it's a miracle the field hasn't crumbled.

-4 points
0
4
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:18 am

And CFO.

-2 points
1
3
mnbadger's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:06 am

Coolhand, not only will they survive, they'll rapidly move forward!
Win/Lose/Draw in 2023 I don't care.
Just show hustle, energy, scheme and game management improvements by players and staff and I'll be very satisfied in our 2023 GPPkrs!
GPG!

4 points
5
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:33 pm

You're more optimistic about the coaching staff than I am. I've seen them do at least a competent job with the development phase, if they've been excellent at that? I don't know enough to be able to say, either way.

Talent evaluation is TBD, although with a couple questionable decisions that might really bite GB on the ass, most notably not bringing back Adrian Amos. He was only about 2 million last year, although I don't know what it would have cost to keep him this year.

In-game adjustments is the anxiety producer for me. I give both JB and MLF this year to prove it. I give JL10 2.

2 points
2
0
Cheezehead72's picture

August 30, 2023 at 06:20 am

I read an article recently that said the Packers have the lowest payroll for their offense which is not a surprise but it was by how much. They are over $10 million dollars below the Commanders who are 31. Now that is a statement not a complaint. I realize due to Murphy and Gutekunst catering to Rodgers and trying to make him happy with a new big contract we are feeling the pain this year.

I am surprised they kept Newman with the bad preseason he had and that they kept only 4 CBs. I get keeping only 4 CBs being that the rest of the CBs are simular in talent and they should be able to sign one or more of them to the PS. Like they did last year when they kept only Jones and Dillon because they knew they would be able to bring back 1 or 2 of the three.

They will regret having Clifford as the #2 and releasing McGough. My prediction is that NE will sign McGough today and he will end up being a good back up and my start this year. Yes we know Gute likes his draftees and will hang on to them too long. I just hope that if Clifford has to start he does not play like #2.

-11 points
1
12
DoubleJ's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:22 am

"I am surprised they kept Newman with the bad preseason he had"

Newman is probably OL10 which is just fine. If he was a starter then that would be an issue but as your 4th G you could do a lot worse. Now if someone else becomes available that is better my guess is Newman is the first to go on the OL.

"They will regret having Clifford as the #2 and releasing McGough. My prediction is that NE will sign McGough today and he will end up being a good back up and my start this year."

From what we saw in games Clifford was the better player right now. Could McGough have gotten better as he learned the offense better, sure. However, I doubt he will be signed by anyone and will then be put on the practice squad and elevated for QB3.

15 points
15
0
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:49 am

"Newman is probably OL10 which is just fine."

Because there are moves yet to be made, all those guys at the bottom of position groups that the Packers went heavy on at cutdowns need to be nervous. He could easily be the cut when a TE or CB moves onto the 53.

"From what we saw in games Clifford was the better player right now. "

Neither of those guys moves the needle right now, but I agree: Clifford is the younger guy and showed better in camp. McGough might end up on someone's PS (maybe GB's...they'll want a QB there), but he's not a difference maker. There are better QBs who were cut yesterday.

8 points
8
0
T7Steve's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:22 am

Think they'll pick up Tim B after he got released from the Jets?

-4 points
0
4
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:04 am

He’s older at 28 and has little likely upside. If there were injuries we might see a guy like him picked up during the season, but as a stop gap. Now? I doubt it.

3 points
3
0
T7Steve's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:50 am

I don't think they should, I was just thinking that if they lost out on Mr. Magoo, Tim knows the team and plays for emergency purposes and PS. I definitely want to stay young too.

-1 points
0
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:40 pm

Clifford earned #2. Mr Magoo did not have a fair chance to learn the playbook. Yet. Neither will get a start unless (God forbid) JL10 is injured and can't play. Our only weakness in protection is C. The whole league knows to attack C and RG.

Our salary cap situation is much more complex than just AR12, and he's off the books next season and we still won't be able to afford to keep everybody we'd like, forget about a star FA.

Eric Stokes was on the field 8/1. He's by far the fastest man on the team, or at least he was pre-injury. They're counting him as CB #5, even if he isn't ready to go against da Bares.

1 points
2
1
greengold's picture

August 30, 2023 at 06:27 am

Get DOWN with your funky self, Al!!!

Well done. I’m constantly trying to figure out what Gutekunst is thinking. Been a draft/player personnel nerd most of my life, and that side of team sports is a true passion. There are worse vices.

I do think the DB Room will become more talented moving forward. TE likely gets an add today or via trade. ILB might become bolstered with a Cory Littleton signing. He had his best statistical years under Joe Barry at LAR. Might make for a nice reunion.

I like that the TRENCHES became a focus. Look how many of our playoff runs stopped dead in their tracks with issues there, on both sides of the ball.

Remarkable to note all 11 draft picks from 2022 made the team (per Zach Krause):

Walker. Wyatt. Watson. Rhyan. Doubs. Tom. Enagbare. Carpenter. Ford. Walker. Toure.

This could go down as one for the ages... especially if Carpenter becomes what they've envisioned, and the remainder continue to show positive development. 10 of those 11 draft picks have shown marked improvement.

FYI, the Packers are #15 in the Waiver Claim process.

LFG GPG

6 points
8
2
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:53 am

"I do think the DB Room will become more talented moving forward."

I think they're gambling on health and PS elevations (Ballentine) until Stokes can be activated.

"TE likely gets an add today or via trade. "

I agree: they're likely to do something, but I like Al's inference that management seems to be committed to playing the rookies. Apparently they want Allen on the PS.

"This could go down as one for the ages... especially if Carpenter becomes what they've envisioned"

As a late day-3 pick, Carpenter is a success as a ST mainstay.

5 points
5
0
PeteK's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:41 am

Non moves means they're sticking with their TEs. Okwuegbunam from Denver was available for a sixth and a solid blocking Hess (Falcons) is still available. My hope is that moves will be made later in the season when better players will be available and a clearer picture of team needs comes into focus. They have about 13 mill in cap space.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 10:23 am

Hess from the Falcons as a better blocker sounds like a good idea. The question is how quickly could he learn where we need blocks well enough to be effective?

1 points
1
0
mnbadger's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:12 am

I may be the odd man on this one, but Carpenter better be a valuable ST's player because he gets lost in run support as an ILB, as far as I could see.
S/B good in coverage as well as blitzing from ILB, but if he's a liability in run game, we don't have to worry about Punt return skills, only kickoff return skills.
GPG!

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:43 pm

I would LOVE to see Tariq Carpenter become a great hybrid LB / CB. Chop off TEs trying to run underneath coverage, chop that off at the knees ...

1 points
2
1
Savage57's picture

August 30, 2023 at 06:37 am

For the first time in a long time, this is our TEAM. Not a collection of chess pieces assembled on the board to protect the queen and do her bidding. A team of equals.

I'm more jacked to see what these aspirational young men can produce than I've been for about a decade. Within an environment where for the foreseeable future their success will be determined by how they integrate into a cohesive unit . A unit where each member knows their Job 1 is to play to their potential and have each other's backs, knowing that doing so will produce a sum greater than the total of its parts.

17 points
20
3
greengold's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:05 am

Same.

Imagine Savage, with MORE help on the way today, tomorrow, Friday...

3 points
4
1
tonyorth's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:19 am

This is a great take. A more tram-oriented onfield mindset on both sides of ball - each guy being where he is supposed to be when he is supposed to be there. I am no expert but does keeping just 4 CB's tell us that Joe listened and will play more press, which likewise requires a LOT of confidence that those guys can win their matchups.

2 points
3
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 10:25 am

Stokes was on the field 8/1. They're counting on him giving us 5 at CB.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:45 pm

Savage is #26, what's the story with your screen name?

Btw, very well put.

GPG!!

1 points
1
0
Ya_tittle's picture

August 31, 2023 at 07:06 pm

They are young and hungry. I like it.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 06:49 am

There’s an assumption in this piece that this is essentially a final roster. It’s not one I subscribe to. This year the league has a pause between cut down day and game 1. I believe that the chances are that GMs will be busy now shuffling.

In our case, I could see movement at corner, slot, S, G and TE. That said, the one waiver that could be a mistake is waiving Allen. I’m no pro scout, but a quick review of TE cuts didn’t throw up an obviously currently better blocking TE. Hopefully no other GM needs one and sees Allen as their best option.

At safety, in contradiction of your theme, we kept AJJ as an intriguing prospect and a bunch of never good enough types. The one guy I thought flashed some upside, Moore, was waived over a seemingly transitory injury.

Finally, nothing against Tenuta, but what’s going on with 11 OL, comprised of more than 50% tackles, even if one goes to IR, they clearly want him able to return? Something is up.

Huber, I think suggested Tenuta could play G, but he had not been tried there this summer despite our issues and doesn’t exactly fit the profile physically, despite a guard like mauler approach I like. I think that they want to trade Nijman and also still have the option to move Bakh before the deadline, or if not that, I confess I do not understand the thinking.

Now, on to the churn I hope, be it by waiver or PS raid, I hope Gute is going to be active.

-3 points
4
7
greengold's picture

August 30, 2023 at 06:58 am

I don't think Al is insinuating in any way that this is a Final 53... key word: "initial."

I do agree with you there's much shuffling to occur today and throughout the week. I'm hopeful for 2-3 very special additions today. I cannot figure out the rationale with Newman, but I think he's the first voted off the island.

8 points
9
1
Packers2020's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:08 am

Greengold,

I hope you are right on Newman but unless they find a guard or two they can replace him with I fear we are stuck with him for yet another year.

3 points
3
0
PackerAaron's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:02 am

He literally calls it an "initial" roster in the first line of the piece.

14 points
16
2
greengold's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:07 am

HAHAHAHAHAHA. You said, "literally."

BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Thanks, Aaron!!! I almost went there myself, and hit the brakes. "Whoah! Slow down, Tiger!"

I was going to say, "The significance of underlining is lost on today's youth."

6 points
7
1
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:26 am

Yes, I can read, Al also references the Tenuta to IR move. I was referring to how I read what follows, for example referencing Newman and 4CBs.

2 points
5
3
greengold's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:28 am

Lol. All in good fun, my friend.

3 points
4
1
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:32 am

I really just wanted to highlight that this year the “initial”
post cut down roster maybe more of an interim one than before, now there’s an extra week before game one and thus constructed with a slightly different mindset at the back end.

3 points
7
4
murf7777's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:47 am

I believe this is now the third year in a row where there has been an extra week before game one.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:47 pm

I hope they don't let Nijman get away. He's clearly one of our best five. Losing both him and Bakh would be devastating.

3 points
3
0
NickPerry's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:00 am

"The Packers are clearly building for the future over the current. That doesn't mean they aren't trying to win in 2023 - they most certainly are."

One doesn't have to be a rocket scientist to see what's going on. THIS Packers team, the 2023 team is all about building success for the future. In 2008 when Rodgers took over he had Donald Driver as the Vet, Jennings starting year 3, and James Jones was starting year 2. At TE they had Donald Lee who was in his 5th year and a promising rookie named Finley.

In 2023 Love has NONE of that. He basically has two James Jones in Watson and Doubs, and then EVERYONE else is a Finley...A promising rookie filling Packers fans with hope and optimism. BUT, what Love has that Rodgers didn't is a better O-Line and the best RB tandem in the NFL.

In the WR room Watson and Doubs are being looked at as leaders which is you think about it is a bit ridiculous. That's NOT a knock on either of those players, I happen to think BOTH will ball out this season if they stay healthy...Something NEITHER did in 2022. But to ask them to LEAD when they both are still LEARNING how to play WR in the NFL is a bit much IMO.

I get WHY Gute built his roster this way. With $57.8 MILLON in Dead Cap space (Thank you Aaron Rodgers and Mark Murphy) he didn't have any cap space to do anything else. This IS the best roster IMO he could have built.

But don't get it twisted, winning would be nice, but 2023 ISN'T about winning. Gute would NEVER come out and say it but he didn't need to. This Roster says it for him. What it is ALL about building a chemistry on both sides of the ball, especially the offense. The kicker is with a watered down NFC, a VERY watered down NFC, the Packers could still make the playoffs. Hell, 9-8 might win their division and I think this team is capable of that record.

Whatever the Packer look like this year, whether they win a bunch of games or lose them isn't what's most important. BUILDING a chemistry and LEARNING how to win is what's important. My hope is we see progress each week and by next season they have the experience they'll need moving into 2024.

23 points
24
1
T7Steve's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:22 am

"But to ask them to LEAD when they both are still LEARNING how to play WR in the NFL is a bit much".

How about if they have a coach lead them and teach them about the NFL? I think they'll start coaching and leading these youngsters.

8 points
8
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:56 am

Spot on, Steve. What Gutey and his scouts also seem to prioritize are players who were leaders on their college teams. If young men can become leaders on a college team after a few short years, they lead on a YOUNG pro team, too. Developing player leaders is also a coaches role.

5 points
5
0
Guam's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:18 am

NP: I find the reversal in philosophy from last year to this year stunning. Last year it was all about "keeping the band together" and giving Rodgers all of his older veteran pals to play with. This year it is "out with the old and in with the new". I understand why the change has occurred, but I still marvel at the complete reversal of philosophy from the same management team. Just guessing, but it feels like last year was all Murphy and this year is all Gute.

11 points
12
1
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:24 am

The trade of Rodgers signaled that the rerun bubble in Lambeau had finally burst on the rocks of a depleted roster with an aging top tier. Once the log jam breaks, it will sweep most things down river.

7 points
9
2
Johnblood27's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:27 am

Here's to the removal of flotsam and jetsom...

Now to remove Newman!

5 points
6
1
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:38 am

"Release the river!" Never thought I would find an opportunity to use a Treebeard quote here! Thanks, CW!

6 points
6
0
jurp's picture

August 30, 2023 at 01:59 pm

"I still marvel at the complete reversal of philosophy from the same management team. "

Ah, but it's NOT the same management team. The 2022 de facto HC/GM is now in NY, playing with some of his veteran pals.

1 points
1
0
NickPerry's picture

August 31, 2023 at 05:33 am

YES!!!!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 10:30 am

Guam,

many would suggest that this reversal is all about AR12; as though he were controlling most of the FO.

The same management team going from "run it back" to develop a bunch of yours is usually called a re-build. Pushback against that is out of respect to the veterans still here, in some very key positions.

Hopefully the combination works.

GPG!

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:43 am

"BUILDING a chemistry and LEARNING how to win is what's important."

True Nick. However, I would also premise with team sports, these are prerequisites regardless of average age and/or experience level. Granted, experience is an asset...but not THE key asset IMO.

With a team where 34 players are 25 years or younger, the great equalizer is coaching. And coaching leadership, along with player talent, are the key assets in team sports. When a young team has chemistry (it seems this group does), motivation for the job, WINNING, increases in intensity and generates more winning.

I would liken it to a "flywheel effect". And conversely, when coaching leadership is inept or uninspiring, teams often tumble into a "doom loop" of losing. Motivation for the job wanes and a culture of losing is established.

I believe this team has chemistry. How will the coaches rise to teach and lead the young men?

This will be MLF and his coaches most important season by far for THEIR imprint on season success. If the mission is to win games...the flywheel may be spinning. If winning is not the mission, the doom loop awaits.

This team can reverse the losing record of last year. Lead them Matt!

6 points
6
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:53 pm

"A culture of winning." Very surprising that has to be re-built one year after being the first team to win 13 regular season games three years in a row.

2 points
2
0
mnbadger's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:23 am

thumbs up NP, but I'm not convinced we've got the best RB tandem in football.
We love them and they are very good, AJ is likely top 5.
Many teams have one very good back and one or more specialists in their room. Just like our room.
Chart of RB rooms in the NFL is a classic bell curve. 10% not very good, 10% really good and 80% about the same.
IMO, we're into the 10% of really good rooms, but not the best.
Let the roster shuffling begin and let the cream (cheesecurds) rise to the top!
GPG!

4 points
4
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 10:37 am

Top 10% works. I suppose it's off topic to this site to ask you what teams you think have a better duo?

On topic here is #28 needs run blocking, failure to provide that is not his fault. Straight up the gut on third and short is the most surefire route. We can't run behind Myers at C, and that forms a well known weakness at C and RG. Teams know to attack us there, and it makes us much easier to defend against.

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:12 am

Do you think they protected O-line because they're the most vulnerable to getting poached?

If so (as CW says above), there are a bunch of moves planned by the front office. If they were so worried they protected Newman I hope he's on the block (pun intended). I think he fit in nicely down in Chi Town.

4 points
4
0
DoubleJ's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:36 am

"Do you think they protected O-line because they're the most vulnerable to getting poached?"

For someone like Tenuta, who has shown promise, had he been put on IR before roster cuts he wouldn't have been able to play at all this year. By waiting until today he can be put on IR and come back this year.

6 points
6
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:46 am

Of course it shows they like him enough to want him available to return. The guy is a twice waived career back up so far, so it’s not based on past play or draft position. The question is what does it mean? Why go through those hoops to keep a 6th OT to ensure he’s available to play this year? We have copious injury depth. Yes, Bakh might miss games, but Jenkins can play T, probably better than Tenuta. To me at least, this begs a lot of questions as to the purpose behind it and what it means for the rest of that group.

2 points
3
1
Guam's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:07 am

I read keeping Tanuta as a 2024 issue. Bahk is likely gone next year and Nijman (for reasons I don't understand) seems to have fallen into some disfavor. If both are gone next year as cap casualties, that would leave the Packer tackle spot quite thin. If they really like Tanuta, he could help fill the gap in 2024.

3 points
4
1
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:14 am

In which case they could have put him on IR and not waived him. Without Bakh and Nijman we still have Tom, Jenkins, Jones, Walker who can legitimately play T this year and next. I would expect is to draft at least one next year as well, simply to stagger contracts and development. Yes, Tenuta could be the 5th on that list, but I can’t see that as a real explanation alone. Perhaps I’m just seeing things, we will see.

3 points
4
1
Guam's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:27 am

Fair point about just IRing Tanuta unless they see a need to play him this year (guard or trading one of the current tackles).

4 points
4
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:33 am

Tenuta played pretty well in his limited preseason game opportunities. I think PFF has him rated top Packer OL for the first game.

It could be the coaches see him as being "close" to starter/top backup material. It took Walker a year to make the transition to NFL tackle. It took Yosh the better part of two years to take the step up. Yosh's fellow VA Tech alum Tenuta, is in his second season. Maybe he's getting it too. At 6'8" 320 lbs, he's T size! Seems to have talent.

It could be he is viewed as the potential #4 tackle this year...making Nijman expendable. Would help explain keeping him available for 2023.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:02 pm

No way is Nijman expendable. Too good. Might need to keep him on one side or the other though, let him specialize and he might improve significantly.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

August 31, 2023 at 10:54 am

Andy Herman thinks very differently about Nijman... Been a staunch supporter of Yosh since his UDFA signing, but, I may have come to realize Nijman's hot is hot, and his cold is cold.

-1 points
0
1
DoubleJ's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:15 am

So the risk to the Packers for keeping Tenuta on the first 53 was releasing Matt Orzech, a long snapper. The odds of someone deciding to poach Orzech is very small. Therefore you keep a promising young player at a premium position for a single day and then put him on IR. Now at the same time we could see some other moves being made in the next week. Such as trading Yosh.

2 points
2
0
JerseyAl's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:44 am

Orzech is a vested veteran with three credited seasons, so he is not subject to waivers. He immediately becomes a free agent and "could" sign with any team, but you can be sure the Packers have an agreement with him to not do so.

6 points
6
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:50 am

I am sure there’s something in it for him, but if another team offers him more, no such agreement to agree can have any legal force and I doubt he’d be seen as unreasonable taking such a deal.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:04 am

I which case Gutey can then raise offer.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:08 am

He could enter a bidding war, or Ball could. If we win, that’s just extra cap burnt that we could have avoided though.

2 points
2
0
13TimeChamps's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:31 am

I'm having a hard time envisioning a bidding war for a LS. Seems like a lot of hand wringing over nothing.

5 points
6
1
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:20 am

I’m not bothered particularly, just intrigued as to them
Going through some risk to protect another T for this season. It’s possible someone wants Orzech and he isn’t protected (yet), but it’s more the context.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:32 am

A long snapper "bidding war" will burn "cap"? It would be a beanie.

4 points
4
0
stockholder's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:38 am

They liked Hanson too.
Either they have it like Tom showed, or move on.

4 points
4
0
jannes bjornson's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:38 am

Players, not plays.

-1 points
0
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:58 pm

Moving Jenkins off LG to tackle makes NO sense. Walker and Mt Caleb may both be competent backup OTs, and Nijman may not be as good at swing tackle as he'd like, but we're not so deep at OT that we can afford to go cutting them.

I am prepared to scream over Myers at C though. Moving Tom there is just too obvious, and would help everything so much ...

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:55 am

Right on, DoubleJ. There's value to having those players you already liked enough to acquire, who've spent time developing with the team, and learning the system. Especially late in season, if the need presents.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:02 am

This is a really good pass-blocking OL...but one has an untenable contract in 2024 (Bakh), one's rookie deal is up (JRJ), one seems to be someone everyone thinks they can improve on (Myers), one is a second-year player starting at a position everyone seems to want him NOT playing (Tom), and one is a valuable and experienced swing tackle playing under a one-year deal (Nijman) but is also 27 years old aleady. Shit! Aside from Jenkins that's the whole top of the OL depth chart!

It's been said here several times: this is a roster about the future, and OL might be as indicative of it as any position group.

6 points
6
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:09 am

That's a good summary. Yet Tenuta never looked like a guy who could start. He really didn't look like a guy who could be a viable backup. Walker will be on the team in 2024. Can we form any inferences about what the team really thinks about Caleb Jones? Or are they thinking Tenuta's mauler nature might be a fit at OG despite never giving him any reps there? Dp they just want him for STs - which he has played in the past?

Suffice to say that I find these machinations baffling.

5 points
5
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:37 am

A 6'8" G would be interesting. Would that make him the tallest G in Packer history?

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:21 am

Almost certainly for the Packers. I believe the tallest G to have played any significant time in the NFL was 6’7” Robert Gallery, after failing at T. It didn’t work out.

However, one team has played a bigger G. Dan Skipper, 6’10 a deep roster journeyman T, started one game at G for the Lions early last year. He is no longer on their roster.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 12:11 pm

6' 10"? Holy beanstalk, Batman!

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 10:47 am

TGR,

I'm with ya. Nothing about his combine or scouting reports suggests Tenuta might be good. YET - a mauler at G? Hell yes that's a useful "draft and develop!"
I have NO personal opinion about him from being at practices, what little I did see of him I could not identify as either good or bad. If that means he fit in it might mean he also could maintain the standard?

0 points
1
1
mnbadger's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:25 am

I'll bet Newman is one of the few people on earth that would look "good" in purple!
GPG!

3 points
3
0
stockholder's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:24 am

Clearly building for the future, over for the current.-
Gutey had No choice. He put this team in Cap Hell.
The best FA signings brought us back. The All in.
(The Smith Brothers, Turner, etc. )
What was old has become New again. The TT way.
Youth -Upside and potential = Don't be afraid of change.
The 22 of 24 explains the odds. And being cheap.
But this movement along the DL has been long over Due.
Including getting the fastest WRs too late.
Too much is put on one star and not the position.
And thats clearly what we saw again with the CBs.
Then there is always one star that is nursing something.
Yes- Bahk needs to be traded now. - Or 11 OL says too many.
But regardless how many guys look promising.
The bust rate has shown its ugly face in Green Bay.
And Gutey doesn't fill the needs until the season is OVER.

-17 points
2
19
jannes bjornson's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:40 am

Not a man for all seasons...

4 points
5
1
TKWorldWide's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:52 am

One Trick Pony.
Cow Reincarnated.
Cornflakes Chock Full of Piss.
Tiresome.
Must Be a Fun Guy to Hang Out With.

4 points
7
3
stockholder's picture

August 30, 2023 at 01:02 pm

Sorry you feel that way.
I hope you think clearer.
If not for yourself.

-2 points
2
4
jannes bjornson's picture

August 30, 2023 at 04:47 pm

Keep up the good work. Fire it at 'em.

-2 points
1
3
TKWorldWide's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:47 pm

Your thinking is always very clear. Always on the negative. It would be different if it seemed like you were analytical, but the constant negativity is a pain. Oh, I know, you’re going to claim that you’re just “realistic”, but why is “realistic’s” glass ALWAYS half empty?
Blind homerism is nauseating.
So is blind pessimism.

6 points
6
0
GregC's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:30 am

One thing the roster suggests is that maybe Rich Bisaccia does not have quite as much pull as we may have thought. Dallin Leavitt and Tariq Carpenter made the roster purely on special teams ability, but some of the other special teams guys got cut: Innis Gaines, Corey Ballentine, Shemar Jean-Charles, and Patrick Taylor. No replacement TE was brought in for special teams ace Tyler Davis. Eric Wilson is on there, but he is the fourth best ILB anyway. The roster is heavy at D-line and OLB, which are not positions where you get a lot of special teams players. Maybe not any. The only one of the six wide receivers who is important to the special teams is Jayden Reed, who will be the punt returner. Bisaccia has a lot of coaching to do to get the special teams up to speed.

2 points
4
2
T7Steve's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:49 am

I think, like they started to do last season, that they'll have a bunch of starters willing to play on teams. They aren't going to let up on STs now that they took it back from the dead.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:58 am

Let’s see if guys like Taylor and Ballentine land in the PS (and maybe some alternative options from outside). Elevations can be used to bolster STs, and injuries will happen to clear roster spots but this way we retain more non ST talent to start while still keeping his captain Leavitt, his best player last year, Wilson and presumably also his young favorite Carpenter.

I agree with you that Wilson earned his place as a defensive player alone, but thats a happy coincidence: the other two certainly did not. Ballentine may have some future defensive upside. Leavitt does not. Gaines and SJC were good but not great STers. To survive on STs alone, you have to be a consistent top difference maker. In his eyes that’s Leavitt and Carpenter. Wilson was already making it (as were Nixon and Reed as returners).

4 points
4
0
Cheezehead72's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:16 am

Actually LBs are a position used on special teams that is why many teams have been going to a 3-4 defense so they have more LBs.

2 points
3
1
GregC's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:37 am

I've heard that about the 3-4 defense, but I don't think any of our OLBs play on special teams. I could be wrong about that.

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:55 am

Here are 2022 snap counts for the Packers. More than a couple OLB played STs. Garvin is gone.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/gnb/2022-snap-counts.htm

3 points
3
0
GregC's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:29 am

Thanks for that dobber. Some of the OLBs played a fair amount on special teams last year. Probably their roles are less visible though, like on defense when the other team attempts field goals.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:56 am

Wilson was our best ST player last year and our leading tackler. Carpenter became a leading STer last year and is only in the roster for STs at this point. They are our leading ILB contributors, and that’s normally the main source in a 4/3. Most OLBs are bigger and play more in blocking/protection and rush roles.

4 points
4
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:12 am

I am not sure about that, Greg. Coach Rich 2023 is now Assistant HC. Rich 2022 was solely ST Coach.

I expect he and MLF had significant input on the current 53 to help guide Gutey's decisions.

And, with regards to ST duties, we have 2 rookie kickers, both with boom bust potential. Rich was pulling that rope!

4 points
4
0
mnbadger's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:30 am

DLeavitt should NOT be a GBPkr this year, sorry.
No future upside and no playmaking skills.
He was very average on st's last year.
His only real splash play is when he whiffed badly on the blocked punt for a td.
I'm expecting he and newman are the first two cuts after FA's are brought in post-cut.
Here's a conspiracy for you - I wonder if he's got pictures of MM doing things with the old qb?
GPG!

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 11:03 am

Newman played 68 snaps on ST last year. It surprised me to see that. Of our O linemen we still have, he and Myers got the most ST snaps last year. Several others did play.

1 points
1
0
mnbadger's picture

September 07, 2023 at 05:16 pm

they had to give him st's snaps.
Too much of a risk to play with #1 offense and too embarrassing to the gm to cut him.
I respect the gm but throw up in my mouth when I think of Newman in a GBPkr jersey on game day.
GPG

1 points
1
0
fireball's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:30 am

I would've kept McGough. There is the idea that if McGough clears waivers, the Packers will sign him to the practice squad. My thought is that McGough will be signed by another team especially after his showing at the Seattle game. What little I saw of McGough, I liked him better than Sean Clifford. Plus McGough has the great USFL experience.

I'm remembering the huge mistake that Packers made in 2017 cutting Taysom Hill.

-10 points
3
13
fireball's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:38 am

P.S. The packers kept Brett Hundley instead of Taysom- the year that Aaron Rodgers broke his collarbone.

-2 points
2
4
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:06 am

Taysom Hill has never really been a true QB. He’s a great gadget player. I don’t see the comparison with McGough, who is nowhere near that kind of athlete and looked like a QB with some upside but lots of rough edges. A classic PS candidate.

If you are right, and a team thinks he’s worthy of a roster spot then so be it. I was not a fan of the Clifford pick, but he has proved far better than expected over a much larger sample against better players. Just because I didn’t expect that doesn’t mean I can’t accept it as having transpired.

6 points
8
2
fireball's picture

August 30, 2023 at 02:47 pm

I get you. Tough to argue against your excellent points.

1 points
1
0
jont's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:47 am

They kept Joe Callahan instead of Tayson Hill as the No. 3 behind Aaron Rodgers and Brett Hundley.

4 points
4
0
GregC's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:39 am

It was only one drive, and I never heard anything about McGough lighting it up in practice. He doesn't seem to be a hot commodity, but we'll see. There are some teams who are keeping three QBs, so maybe he'll sneak onto somebody's roster.

4 points
4
0
mrtundra's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:57 am

Think Practice Squad.

5 points
5
0
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:07 am

The old saying is that the most popular guy on any football roster is the backup QB...apparently now it's the backup QB who got cut.

Again.

7 points
7
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:27 am

Huge mistake? Not really. Hindsight is perfect vision and at the time the cut was understandable. The Packers wanted to evaluate his NFL QB skills on the PS...the Saints upped the ante.

In 6 years with the Saints, Hill has thrown for 2300 yards, 10 TDs, 8 INTs, and a rating of 88.7. Doesn't look to be a huge mistake, does it? The Saints have tried to make him a QB, and he isn't. He's played STs, RB and now is Taysom Hill the Tight End.

8 points
8
0
GregC's picture

August 30, 2023 at 12:42 pm

Brett Hundley's career stats: 1,902 passing yards, 9 TDs, 13 INTs, 67.6 passer rating.

1 points
1
0
fireball's picture

August 30, 2023 at 02:51 pm

I get you guys. I'm just saying that at the very least Taysom would have been a whole lot better than Brett Hundley when Aaron broke his clavicle.

2 points
2
0
GregC's picture

August 30, 2023 at 04:12 pm

Yep. They kept the wrong guy.

2 points
2
0
Since'61's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:38 am

I'm thinking that once Orzech is signed as the LS Newman will be moved which gets us down to the more expected 10 OLs. Beyond that another OL or Edge player could be moved when Stokes is ready to return (at some point in the season) which gets the Packers back to 5 CBs.

Any of the safeties could be moved if Gute signs an actual NFL Safety off the cutdowns today. A TE signing is another possibility along with a Vet WR.

This is a process and we're still in the early stages before we get to the final 53. A few more moves and a few days yet to go. Thanks, Since '61

7 points
8
1
T7Steve's picture

August 30, 2023 at 07:54 am

These days it seems they don't get to their final 53 till the season's over. I can't believe how much they shuffle during the season now that they can elevate a player three times and keep vets on the PS.

5 points
5
0
GregC's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:13 am

Yeah, cut-down day is not as dramatic as it used to be. As a fan, it was more fun the old way, but times change. I don't know if this is any better for the players. It must be an emotional roller coaster for some of them. But at least the expanded practice squad (from 10 to 16) means there are more players on payroll.

3 points
3
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:44 am

As a kid reading Jerry Kramer's "Instant Replay", I recall his description of "cut day" and the Turk coming to your dorm door at St. Norberts. Constant butterflies until you made it. Kramer even had doubts until it was over.

Being treated, as Henry Jordan stated "like dogs" all camp (I think they did 2 practice/day too), only to be cut after you thought was a good showing...wow.

7 points
7
0
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:11 am

"I'm thinking that once Orzech is signed as the LS Newman will be moved"

Which begs the question: why not just cut Newman and keep Orzech in the first place?...unless they're playing "keep-away" with division rivals who might have needs on the OL.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:36 am

The supposed (per reporters) purpose of the Orzech move is to get Tenuta through to in season IR, with Orzech being a vested veteran who is not at a premium position or subject to waivers and quite possibly was going to get a new deal anyway since his contract was inherited.

There’s a chance there is a LS needy team that intervenes. Orzech is the best LS not signed, so there is a risk of some sort. Obviously the Packers felt it was one worth taking to get the ability to reactivate Tenuta.

I don’t see that affecting Newman. I think Newman stays unless and until Gute finds a direct replacement on the waiver wire, a newly available FA (injury return or cut) or off a PS once things settle. We had no available G prospect behind him and Myers. Had they, he might well have gone.

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:05 am

Boop.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:10 am

The "4 CB" is the real eyebrow raiser. I never saw that coming. It's nothing to lose two or even three in a single game...it's scary to think of the Packers moving safeties out to the perimeter in coverage.

That said, I think they'll elevate a Ballantine or SJC (or whatever of the 2-3 CBs they'll have on the PS) for ST work the first few weeks to fill as a 5th CB at least until Stokes can play.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:38 am

That maybe why Wood is saying they PS Kiondre Thomas. He had our best preseason coverage grade. They still need to show that they have a slot back up too.

2 points
2
0
TKWorldWide's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:54 am

LaDarius Gunter is still available.

4 points
4
0
Coach Cleve Steamer's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:14 am

These anticipated moves don’t really address the gamble at corner,safety and tight end. Unless someone of significant value is traded for a considerable upgrade at any of theses positions it’s still bottom feeding for this roster. Maybe that’s just fine. The cap space is limiting and our competitors know it and some will be in similar situations.

6 points
6
0
stockholder's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:45 am

Very well stated!

2 points
2
0
TxFred's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:16 am

It will be fun for us Pack fans to grow & develop with '24 version of this team. Oh, there will be speedbumps & maybe a detour but, grab a drink & brat sit back and enjoy. GPG!!!

3 points
4
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 11:12 am

Fred, this is exactly what I'm planning on!

1 points
1
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:24 am

I expect to see at least two CBs on the PS. With Alexander, Douglas, and Valentine, we have three high/starter quality CBs; they only have to last four weeks, until Stokes returns. In the meantime, the PS guys are there is someone or two gets injured.

I'm a big fan of McGough, and hope he makes the PS, but he's still the #3 QB, and older than Love and Clifford.

I'm really hoping DuBose goes to our PS; I still believe he's (potentially) equal to Doubs/Heath/Wicks as a possession receiver.

I think one of the young OTs will be dangled as trade bait for someone's C/OG, to replace Newman. In the meantime, Walker/Nijman/C Jones could be our tackles next year (with Tom going to center, please, please, please...)

2 points
3
1
dobber's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:00 am

"With Alexander, Douglas, and Valentine, we have three high/starter quality CBs;"

I think we should be very cautiously optimistic on Valentine. He showed well during preseason, but if he ends up in the starting lineup or third/nickel CB due to injury or some other circumstance, he's going to get picked on big-time. That's when we'll find out what the Packers have in him.

3 points
3
0
stockholder's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:48 am

Pouched coming-
Bellintine and Jean Charles.

0 points
2
2
LLCHESTY's picture

August 30, 2023 at 04:22 pm

What does this even mean?🤔

3 points
4
1
LeotisHarris's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:03 pm

Perhaps he anticipates an influx of marsupials?

4 points
5
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 11:15 am

He's playing possum

2 points
2
0
jont's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:52 am

"I'm really hoping DuBose goes to our PS; I still believe he's (potentially) equal to Doubs/Heath/Wicks as a possession receiver."

I like him too, and I'm sure he'll be on the GB PS.

If a player's claimed, as I understand it, he goes to that team's 53, and Dubose isn't ready for that, or at least hasn't shown it. Nobody will grab him.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:36 am

Pretty sure they're counting on #21, the fastest man on the team and by a wide margin, returning from injury. He was on the field 8/1. So they're thinking they have 5 at CB.

It wouldn't surprise me if Tyler Goodson and Patrick Taylor are retained, PS at first, and called up as needed. I think #39 could have an impact, not like #33 but bouncing around everywhere as a legitimate checkdown threat.

We'll see ...

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:44 am

Goodson was waived injured. Once he passes his physical, they will settle with him probably. Then he’s a FA any team can sign but us for 3 weeks. After that we could resign him ultimately the roster or PS if he is still available. They could also in theory keep him on IR all year to keep his rights, but his contract expires after this season, so that seems pointless.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 11:17 am

Thanks. All these details are stuff I have difficulty keeping track of.

1 points
1
0
GregC's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:46 am

Goodson is talented, but if he's on the game day roster, wouldn't he just be doing things that could be done just as well by Jayden Reed or Aaron Jones? I suppose they could design some special plays for him, but then you are detracting from practice time with the starters. Maybe they have enough to work on already without adding in a player who would not be on the field a lot even in the best case scenario.

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 11:20 am

I think Goodson fits better as a reserve / backup on PS. If #33 goes down to injury, the starters could all practice and yes it would be on gadget plays where he's best.

I'm hoping to see TE run the ball, too.

1 points
1
0
Bitternotsour's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:41 am

4 at CB creates a nice narrative when you're trying to convince another teams cut players to come over to your practice squad. "hey kid, you can stay in Cincinnati and never move off the practice squad, but in Green Bay we only have 4 corners on the roster and we are one injury away from you moving on to the 53..."

1 points
1
0
T7Steve's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:09 am

I understand they have to roster anyone they pick up to the 53.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 12:24 pm

I think vested 4 year vets who were cut are free to go anywhere, 53 or PS...and after 3 weeks (I think) for all other cut players.

You're right for the next 3 weeks. Less than 4 year players need to go on the 53. Gutey seems to enjoy this time as he manicures his rosters.

3 points
3
0
RCPackerFan's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:54 am

"My prediction highlights: Whelan over O'Donnell, as few had this right. Also, getting the S, DL, WR and OL group exact (except for Tenuta technically, who will be IR'd today) Keeping Jonathan Ford. Brenton Cox making the team, Tarvarius Moore cut. Royce Newman - to me was a pretty sure thing (sorry). "
The way Newman has looked, I wasn't thinking he'd make the 53.

"My Prediction lowlights: I struggled the most with the defense and it showed. I couldn't fathom only four CBs, making me keep so-so players like Shemar Jean-Charles and Innis Gaines on the roster. I couldn't fathom 6 EDGE rushers, so I cut Hollins against my own wishes. "
One reason for keeping only 4 CB's right now. They will have some on the PS that can be elevated. And they will be getting Stokes back at some point. But they also maybe have their eyes on the waiver wire for someone.
All 6 Edge players deserved to be on the 53. I would assume Cox will be a game day inactive for the first however many games.

The one move I'm a little surprised with is that they didn't keep DuBose. He showed promise after coming back from injury. I personally would have kept him over Newman.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 09:23 am

DuBose was a 7th round pick who missed most of camp and all summer. He’s on a team with an unproven but very talented roster. He’s also a very similar type of prospect to both Heath and Wicks and isn’t a core STer. Heath wrapped up the available spot in his own merits. Wicks probably on draft position. DuBose would have needed an injury to one of those to make it.

He is not Watson, Raw but a freakish talent, rather they appear to be handling him the conventional way for a late pick with promise but little practice time and a lot of players above him: add him to the practice squad to develop further. It won’t harm his career if he’s good. Wicks and Dubose won’t be active without injuries and could well see time when they do this year. Next year, if Dubose progresses more, it could be a whole different story.

The chances of any late 7th with minimal film being claimed are remote. Heath just won the place he might have had this year had Heath not grabbed it while he was injured.

5 points
5
0
RCPackerFan's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:49 am

Yeah, and I get why they let him go. I assume he will be put on the PS.

Just me, but in terms of the best 53. I just feel that DuBose already showed that he is ahead of Newman. But i get why they did what they did it.

1 points
1
0
Oppy's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:54 am

It will be interesting to see what happens when our QB is given nothing but WR's the other guy would have told you are impossible to achieve with because they aren't 4+ year vets.

My prediction: They'll be productive. This group of young WRs will somehow magically learn this supposedly complicated offense well enough to execute by the first few games of the season.

Packers fans that pay close attention are going to learn a whole lot about both the past and the future in 2023.

4 points
7
3
croatpackfan's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:35 am

"This group of young WRs will somehow magically learn this supposedly complicated offense well enough to execute by the first few games of the season."

By MLF formula, offense should be complexity look of simplicity. That means no complicated routes and plays. Lets hope it will be like that.

-1 points
1
2
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:01 am

On a young team, there will be young leaders emerging. I think they will mix well with a solid core of veteran leaders.

Love, Bakht, Jenks, AJ, AJD, Kenny, Gary, Preston, Campbell, Alexander, Douglas...that's a solid veteran core of leadership on the 2023 Packers.

I look forward to seeing who will emerge as leaders from the rookies & sophomores.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 11:27 am

This is all fascinating, but the veterans as leaders just makes too much sense. I don't see why we need roomies acting like leaders.

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:10 am

Never been a big MLF fan , but with the 12 monkey off his back and the lesser expectations on this team… he may do well. I wish we had a better DC, but we don’t.
A winning record would be a feather in MLFs cap. I think it’s achievable. There is no pressure on this team(except on the DC).
MLF has crumbled under pressure in the past, so I look forward to a good season.

0 points
4
4
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 10:55 am

Packers inquired about Colts RB Jonathon Taylor? That's now being reported.

If true, indicates the 2023 Packers may be looking to win games this season.

3 points
3
0
T7Steve's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:15 am

Not necessarily this season. He's very young and probably would start out on the PUP. I think Indi still has as PUP.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:28 am

Yeah, he's on PUP...4 game hiatus.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

August 30, 2023 at 11:39 am

He’s on PUP after an ankle injury. He’d take a while to be up to speed even if that suddenly healed. I’d see this as more a move for next year. Color me skeptical though.

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 31, 2023 at 11:31 am

JT doesn't want to play for the Colts because Irsay won't pay him enough, so come to GB where we mortgaged the future and can't afford a star FA until at least 2025? Somehow it's not surprising to me that this didn't appeal to JT.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

August 30, 2023 at 08:00 pm

The Packers are absolutely, positively looking to win games this season.

1 points
1
0
Lphill's picture

August 30, 2023 at 02:09 pm

the supposed trade for Taylor involved Dillon , he's probably not happy about that.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

August 30, 2023 at 04:29 pm

Regardless- the writing is on the wall.

1 points
2
1