Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Back In Motion

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

On the move - Based on accounts from people who have been at the practices, it appears one thing that our former QB disliked greatly has been re-implemented as a core principle of this offense - pre-snap motion. This fits perfectly into the narrative (and one I fully subscribe to) that Matt LaFleur will be free to do things HIS way and give us his pure vision of what the offense should look like. It started out this way when LaFleur first came to Green Bay, but steadily declined as it proved to be a source of distraction for his quarterback as he ran the clock down to -.5 seconds making various adjustments. Personally, I would think that pre-snap motion can force the defense to tip their hand as to what scheme the are running that play, but then again, I'm not a future Hall of Fame quarterback, so who am I to argue?  Prominent in this move back to motion has been Jayden Reed, who by all appearances will be the dynamic chess piece the Packers had hoped Amari Rodgers would be when they traded UP to draft him. It's ironic that they nabbed Reed after trading BACK twice.

Keep Yosh on the Bench - Let me be clear, I want Yosh there because he is too valuable as a backup swing tackle and I want to avoid the mistake of having to move multiple players around if David Bakhtiari has to miss some games. I say start Zach Tom at right tackle and live with Josh Meyers at Center. If Bakhtiari or Tom has to miss a game, it's a player-for-player substitution with Yosh. If Meyers has to miss a game, hopefully there will be a designated backup that will not be Tom. I'm speculating the Packers may be thinking the same thing, which is why there are three other players listed as centers on the roster; Empey, Schneider and Hanson. Let's work towards establishing arguably the most important factor for a successful offensive line - continuity!

Note: After writing this, I saw that the Packers released their first depth chart and it looks like we are on the same page as to who starts at right tackle. I know an early depth chart isn't always meaningful overall, but I feel like this particular move is telling us something. At least for now.

Pressure Points - Interesting article here from Rob Demovsky about indications there's a change afoot with the Packers' defense overall, but specifically with the defensive backs. In addition to the individual exit interviews after last season, Barry had one extra group meeting where he basically asked the players how THEY wanted to play. The response was loud and clear. Rasul Douglas said, "We basically told him we want to be aggressive. We want to be up close in guys’ faces and we want to challenge and make throws tight.” “So far,” Rasul added, “that’s what he’s doing.”

Workhorse - He's unexpectedly back and supposedly looking great. And to think there were reports during his draft season that Rashan Gary wasn't a hard worker. I fell for it myself and ended up with some egg on my face. Taught me a lesson, though.

Knock It Off - I hate to admit this, but curiosity got the best of me. I can count on one hand the number of Hard Knocks episodes I've seen since its inception. Yet there I was last night, plunking down $9.99 for a MAX subscription so I could check out our former quarterback and his new team. I expected to hate it, but I didn't. There also wasn't that much interesting about it. It was fairly boring, but I did enjoy hearing the coaches speak in an unfiltered manner, like real people, not the robots you get in press conferences.  As for Rodgers, he was Mr. Positivity, acting his part as the grizzled veteran while showing off with no-look passes. The Jets players and coaches were downright giddy beside themselves. 65% baby!

Watch Party - For anyone in the Green Bay area Friday evening, there will be a CHTV watch party at Stadium View with Aaron Nagler and special guest Matt Ramage. They'll be watching the game and drinking some beers. Stop by and say hi if you can.

 

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

NFL Categories: 
15 points
 

Comments (140)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 06:10 am

Pre-snap motion & attacking the middle of the field are two huge takeaways with LaFleur this season. I LOVE it!

Nice scoop by Demo on the changes we’re seeing in the secondary. This is the first I’d heard of it, and it makes a ton of sense. Rasul & Jaire are locking down like a vice.

As for OL, I think this will remain fluid through TC based upon merit earned in the next 3 weeks of preseason games & practices. I want the best OL we can put out there to start the season. On that, found this in my notes on Tom:

OT Zach Tom - Arguably the best combine numbers of any tackle in the class.

Earned highest pass blocking grade of all the OTs in college football 2021 92.1 Mirroring ability keeps him at OT.

We may not have a choice, if it means Tom at C gives us our best OL to protect Love and clear holes in the running game. Then again, Myers may respond to this recent challenge.

Schneider played 1 game in his college career as a Center. He’s a work in progress as a backup, but a nice brawler at OG. From everything I've read on OG/C Cole Schneider, he's 100% search & destroy.

We’ll see. It will all sort itself out soon enough. The Packers could have a lot of movement in terms of turnover at OL, or none-little at all. Could easily see Bakhtiari/Jenkins/Runyan/Tom, as I could Bakhtiari/Jenkins/Myers/Runyan/Nijman, or Nijman/Jenkins/Tom/Rhyan/Jones. A lot of moving or unmoving parts... What I like seeing are players from the 2s or bottom of the depth chart challenging starters for positions.

***Saving $$$ at OL might prove feasible if the younger players really perform well - and, they WILL get lots of opportunities in these next 3 weeks.
--
Possible Cap Savings not named Bakhtiari at OL 2023:

Jake Hanson $940,000
Jon Runyan Jr. $2,786,670
Royce Newman $1,064,836 (Also another $1,179,836 in 2024)

I could see these 3 players , all of whom are fighting some of the fiercest battles in TC, being business decisions for 2023/24 with the emergence of Sean Rhyan.
--
Gary is amazing to me, returning off PUP less than 9 months after ACL surgery. Wow! Quick healer extraordinaire.

Hard Knocks? Hard NO.

Thanks, Al!!!

11 points
11
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:36 am

GG,

I like these choices you present for potential movement at OL. I'm amazed that Mt Caleb is still under rated. In practice I saw nothing but dominance from him. These 8 players hopefully yield a cohesive "best 5" that plays together for most of the snaps this season. WITH real depth behind them :)

I'd be surprised if they get rid of JRJ to save $2.8MM, even if he's ultimately eliminated as best 5. I think everybody here would love to see Hanson and Newman beat fair and square by so many on the 90 man roster that they become superfluous. MLF and the rest of the FO apparently don't see it that way, yet. The new pieces brought in are just camp bodies, or trying to push out weaker players?

Gary off PUP is not the same thing as him back 100%, but it's a very encouraging step! At 277# he's our biggest OLB, and 272# LVN our second biggest. Would be a lot of fun to see them take the field at the same time! Even though that may have to wait a year. A vicious pass rush could make all the difference in this defense?

5 points
7
2
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:47 pm

Yeah, SicSemperTyrannis, I don't see Gary jumping in Game 1 in Chicago. Especially on that crappy field. But... who knows? I'd rather we exercise some caution with him.

IMO, we are going to have a vicious pass rush even if we rest Rashan Gary for a bit more. We saw we were getting a boatload of interior pass rush in just 2 weeks of TC. None of that took into account our new EDGE players in LVN and Cox Jr. who couldn't really TEE OFF like they are used to doing vs. real opponents.

Once Gary comes back fully healthy, then it's game on, like we haven't seen in GB in some time. Decades. That's my guess.
--

As for Caleb Jones, I do think there's a chance he starts at RT, eventually.

MY THING: Play your best 5. Same as you. Everybody here seems to be wanting Zach Tom to play RT. I get that, but our best OL to start this season may in fact be:

Bakhtiari/Jenkins/Tom/Rhyan/Jones

Now THAT looks like a sturdy wall, able to pass block AND maul. Yosh Nijman would provide some excellent insurance as a backup swing Tackle. If Bakhtiari were somehow traded away this year, Yosh could step in at LT and we wouldn't miss a beat.

I could also see some load management situations using Nijman at LT this season to save Bakhtiari reps for a possible playoff run, giving Caleb Jones even more work.

btw, on Bak. NO WAY do I trade him to NYJ unless they pony up BIG. Not just a removal of that "conditional R2" where they give us the recently proposed R1 outright plus their R3...

I think the Packers would need the Jets' 2024 R1 AND R2 as a minimum offer.

Otherwise, fine. Let's ride that "conditional R2" and see where it goes, while keeping one of the best LT's in the NFL for the entire 2023 season. Does the deal blow up in the Jets face, and that conditional turns into a Top 10??? LOL.

*** None of this takes into account how VALUABLE David Bakhtiari is in trade THIS YEAR. His cap price for 2023 is less than $100,000/game. That's crazy money to many of us, but in the NFL, that is next to nothing.

If any injuries hit LT's on other NFL contenders between now and Week 4, his value in trade for the Packers could skyrocket past anything the Jets are rumored to propose.

2 points
3
1
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

August 09, 2023 at 03:19 pm

You say the best OL to start this season may in fact be:

Bakhtiari/Jenkins/Tom/Rhyan/Jones

Based on what exactly? We have never even seen Rhyan and Jones in actual NFL games, but we know what Myers and Runyan can do. It is also worth considering that Myers was apparently playing hurt much of last year. I'd be happy to have someone jump in and take over that spot. I really don't want it to be Tom because the tackle position is so valuable; I'd love to see him earn a starting spot and maybe even LT whenever we are ready to move on from #69, our stud LT.

But I don't really understand the basis for saying Rhyan and Jones are better? Here are the negatives on Walker (who went undrafted) from a pre-draft profile. Has he overcome these issues in a year on the practice squad?

"Poor footwork and lack of explosiveness limit his upside at the next level. He struggles versus edge rushers with speed and burst and plays with too high of pad level. Lacks the bend, balance and burst to be a high end tackle. No real recovery due to lack of core strength and hip flexibility. Lacks knowledge of aiming points when blocking in a zone and gap run concept. Needs work on weight transfer when transitioning to anchor. Lacks nuance with resetting hands and attacking weaknesses of opponents. Lack of consistent leverage, technique and taking good angles makes him a liability as a run blocker. For his size I would like to see a nastier player but doesn’t destroy smaller defenders."

2 points
3
1
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 03:55 pm

It's my opinion. I stand by it.

You're sharing Rasheed Walker's known to be shitty draft profile NEGATIVES, because...?

YEAH, SHOCKER, WestCoastPackerBacker, players DO develop! I like Rasheed Walker too. I was really happy to see him getting 2nd team reps in the Family Night practice. I thought he did very well. I watched him stone LVN... Camp reports indicate he is doing well too.

Look, I'm NEVER going to like Aaron Rodgers the way you obviously do. I think he turned into a turd when the Packers let Jordy go. Sorry. btw, I didn't even mention Rasheed Walker here in the above posting. WTF?

Just relax. You enjoy your private party with AR over there, up in his ass. And for some good entertainment, here are some of David Bakhtiari's Draft Profile Weaknesses:

Not an ideal build for an offensive lineman, thin in arms

Many difficulties arise from pass blocking on an island

Beaten around the edge without slowing the rusher down and can lose face up against stiff contact due to not having the ability to stop backwards momentum

Move to Guard is likely in his future

Deep drop steps aren't natural and stiff contact jolts him mid-stride

Loses on counter moves, thrown to the side when top heavy or leaning too far over, specifically when run blocking

Whiffs on cut blocks

LOLOLOLOL

-1 points
2
3
NickPerry's picture

August 09, 2023 at 06:15 am

Love this by Al each week...

Pressure... FINALLY, I can't wait to watch this defense IF Barry actually lets them be aggressive and challenge opposing offenses.

If I EVER see a rookie QB dice them up like that Zappe kid from New England last year while Barry has his defense playing off like last season, then Barry HAS to go... Like right after the game.

Times up Joe...Either get it done or your done.

11 points
14
3
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:41 am

NP,

I couldn't agree more. That game was very much a deciding factor for me. I'd love to be proven wrong about this, and the latest buzz about this is great to hear.

Currently I'm less cautiously optimistic and more wait and see on this point. Disrupting the opponent's backfield can make all the difference here ...

5 points
5
0
mnbadger's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:48 pm

NP - I almost totally agree with the "If I EVER . . . " comment. My only disagreement is waiting until after the game.
I'd have security clean his locker and pull him off the premises if it's more than a few consecutive series of soft zone against weaker opponents.
In fact, for the first six weeks, I'd make him pack all personal belongings BEFORE THE GAME as a personal reminder and to make it make it easier on the security detail!
All gas, no breaks! Attack!
GPG!

5 points
5
0
NickPerry's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:43 pm

"In fact, for the first six weeks, I'd make him pack all personal belongings BEFORE THE GAME as a personal reminder and to make it make it easier on the security detail!
All gas, no breaks! Attack!"

BEFORE the game...That one had me rolling AND it's actually a good idea.

2 points
2
0
croatpackfan's picture

August 09, 2023 at 06:40 am

It was the most important from this week article:
"Barry had one extra group meeting where he basically asked the players how THEY wanted to play. The response was loud and clear. Rasul Douglas said, "We basically told him we want to be aggressive. We want to be up close in guys’ faces and we want to challenge and make throws tight.” “So far,” Rasul added, “that’s what he’s doing.”"

Finally!

Only great men have no problems to admit their mistakes. I notice that there is many fans and people connected with football take very serously what "draft experts" thinks about any and every player. From my experience they are right in about 30% cases. This data is very debatable, as I have no hard data to support my opinion, just my impression. I tend to believe to Packers scouts. They show they can find excellent players, even in the late day 3 drafts and from other teams PS candidates.

I thought we would not talk here about FPQB, but it might be also just my impression.

11 points
11
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 07:48 am

croatpackfan, you hit on a number of great points.

Was last season’s underperformance at CB the fault of Barry? Lack of pass rush after week 9 when Gary (& Stokes) went down with season ending injury? Was it DB Coach Jerry Gray calling coverages opposite the wishes of DC Joe Barry?

I’ll wait for the book to come out on that. However, last season’s cushy coverages straight out of the gate begs the question, what if your press man CBs keep playing off ball giving big cushions? There’s a possibility that was the case, and Barry said, “fine, you want to play zone, then I’ll give you zone schemes!”

I’m curious to know if this was Barry’s way of getting buy-in from his players on playing tighter press man coverage? Asking them after the fact, “how do you want to play?” It’s anyone’s guess really.

There was also the elephant in the room of 2022 being a lame duck year with Aaron Rodgers. The possibilities of those effects best left in the past.

We all saw great players underperforming in GB’s secondary. Now they appear to be lighting it up, bigtime. The real tests begin Friday v. CIN in preseason.

You’re not kidding about success rates in the draft. Green Bay IMO is fortunate to have Gutekunst showing what appears to be steady improvement. His scouting staffs, both college & Pro look to be improving as well. They work tirelessly, which is readily apparent. Good stuff.

5 points
6
1
Coldworld's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:09 am

I think Jaire, Douglas and our former DB coach made it clear to everyone by mid season that they weren’t keen on the passive coverages last year. I’m sure Stokes would have agreed too.

7 points
7
0
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:41 am

I'm increasingly convinced that the now-departed DB coach was part of the problem.

-1 points
5
6
Coldworld's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:52 am

If so why did LaFleur try to keep him? There’s no clean answer to that. There is little doubt that he was not happy with soft off coverage.

8 points
8
0
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:53 am

Gray did little to hide his dissatisfaction on being passed over for the DC position when Barry was hired. We all saw his pouty pressers over the last couple years, too.

How often have you worked with someone who's undermining a peer or supervisor but still the peach of the boss' eye? Happens all the time.

That said, we really don't know how hard LaF really tried to retain Gray. LaF chose Barry in 2021 and this last offseason...Barry won the war.

2 points
4
2
Coldworld's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:10 am

If a subordinate can’t get on the same page and it’s known, then he should have been let go. Especially if he didn’t effectively toe the line or did so in a way that promoted dissension. In fact they kept him and tried to retain him. The team conceded that Gray was adamant he wanted to move on. I don’t see any reason to question that aspect.

That is either appalling management or in fact he was a good soldier who followed orders despite stating personal doubt as to their wisdom.

In either case, his view on the soft coverage is known and not invalidated by the possible other issues you propose.

3 points
4
1
LambeauPlain's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:29 pm

"...we really don't know how hard LaF really tried to retain Gray."

I sincerely hope that was not the case. Asking an assistant to stay when you really want him to leave is would not only be disrespectful but also management malpractice & display a timid, wishy washy, easily intimidated HC.

1 points
2
1
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:48 pm

You don't see many people asking how good of a DB coach Jerry Gray actually is. I find that odd.

He got one helluva lotta run as being great with Harrison Smith and Xavier Rhodes in MIN, but they were going to be great no matter who was coaching them.

Your guess that he got his nose pushed out of joint and became disgruntled sounds proper.

0 points
1
1
LambeauPlain's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:41 am

I am increasingly convinced the departed DB coach could not wait to leave GB was due to the DC being THE problem...as the players told Barry after the season they wanted to play the way Coach Gray wanted them to play. Maybe Barry finally encoded the message he resisted from Gray. The two D coaches sparred often last season and even then MLF wanted Gray to stay. IDK.

Interestingly Barry moving to the press box this season.

3 points
3
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:48 pm

"Interestingly Barry moving to the press box this season."

I hope that's not to clear room for MLF to do more complicated cheer-leading.

The viewpoint from the press box may help Barry with making calls and changes to the gameplan. I'm not sure there's much room to get worse so I think it's a very good development.

3 points
4
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:58 am

Dobber,

there was definitely something going on there that wasn't disclosed. If it was as simple as last year's coach wanting to be aggressive vs JB wanting 'bend don't break,' the recent statements would be very ironic. These are details we may never know but hopefully they get it together!

I'm not ready to make predictions for our DBs as a unit, but we're loaded with talent from what I see. And the comraderie is palpable. I don't think that's just a show during the short time they practice in front of fans. I do realize this is easier during practice and gets harder to maintain as the regular season wears on, especially if losses mount.

I still see this season as a potential pivot to long term greatness, and these intangibles can be a substantial part of that equation.

1 points
3
2
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

August 09, 2023 at 03:22 pm

There is definitely some talent at CB, but safety is still a big question. The one true starter is coming off a year in which he was benched for poor play. The rest of the guys who are slated to play across from Savage have so far been "just a guy." We don't really know if any of them will emerge, the way Douglas suddenly did at CB average being a journeyman at several stops throughout the league.

2 points
2
0
Packers2020's picture

August 10, 2023 at 03:46 pm

Agreed, WestCoast.

Safety will be a big need next year in the draft.

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:56 pm

I agree that he may have been part of the problem in that as hard as he may have tried, he didn't have the authority to make the necessary adjustments.
Did he try hard enough?
We'll likely never know what was said in position meetings.
By mid-season or so, he must have determined it was either his or jb's last year in GB so he went more public.
If you're a talented coach, the NFL will find you.
He was without a job for a few weeks as I recall.
Good luck to him, wish he could have been part of the aggressive approach that we damn well better see this year!
GPG!

3 points
3
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:20 am

Amen!

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:50 am

CPF,

while I don't care much to hear from stars about general issues, star players talking about their area of expertise is something I weight much more heavily than most voices. J.A. #23 has said some things that seem contradictory to me: last year he was very vocal about wanting to play aggressively and in man coverage. Recently he said he naturally plays back from the los and is getting help working on his alignment.

I don't know what to make of this but I saw him working his tail off in practice and doing things nobody else did. He was also visibly holding himself to a very high standard, but I was very close to him and could see every detail.

Seeing a new and improved Ja will hopefully only mean good things? As an appointed "on field leader" his attitude and work ethic will maybe be contagious ...

4 points
5
1
croatpackfan's picture

August 10, 2023 at 04:40 am

SST,

I was not reacting to press/zone/off coverage. That is something I do not have enough knowledge to discuss about, but I'm talking how good leader (as leader by position) should make as first task. YOu can plan your strategy, but it is better to plan knowing what the parts of your team (in this case players) would like to do and what suits them best in execution of the plan.

That is basic to make good and realistic plan and have achieve success in its implementation.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

August 09, 2023 at 06:49 am

Play action isn’t new.
Remember- "keep it simple”.
Bet the center screws it up, hiking the ball.

Play Josh trade Bahk.
How can you not be nervous about his knee?
Just a part-Timer; making thousands per snap.

Pressure points- it shows King was the weakest link.

Workhorse?- Thats a term that should be used for RB.

Is your curiosity for the traded pick? Or Rodgers?
You must feel the Jets will be in the play-offs.
Like most people that enjoyed #12 greatness.

Depth chart- With all the hype. Is Gute over-paying?

-12 points
5
17
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:05 pm

I still wonder if AR12's comments about "keep it simple" was his idea of adjusting to things not working. We may never know because of all the changes this season. MLF is less about 'running his offense' and more about trying to get the best out of his players. So far JL10 sounds very interested in either getting the best out of MLF, or at least appeasing him. Maybe they prove to work very well together?

1 points
3
2
stockholder's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:45 pm

To many screw -ups and loses.
Rodgers said there were no meetings after a game-(s).
Not to mention what was put on u-tube about the Rookie Wrs.

-4 points
2
6
x24's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:19 pm

I think “keep it simple” helped Rodger’s playing style. As a veteran QB, he had tricks to read the defense. He’d follow with audibles and change the play call accordingly. Pre-snap motion kinda reset the defense and messed up Rodger’s reads.

For Love, pre-snap motion probably best serves to disguise the play and confuse the defense, an asset for a young QB still learning the game

5 points
5
0
T7Steve's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:39 pm

There is a thought that the Ds were able to bait him as time went on, especially after he lost his relief valve of Adams and became less of a threat to run. Playoff caliber coaches have a lot of game situations to study on him.

2 points
2
0
jont's picture

August 09, 2023 at 06:49 pm

👍, x24

2 points
2
0
BradHTX's picture

August 09, 2023 at 07:44 am

“Personally, I would think that pre-snap motion can force the defense to tip their hand as to what scheme the are running that play, but then again, I'm not a future Hall of Fame quarterback, so who am I to argue?“

And yet, Al, you have brought home to Green Bay exactly the same number of Lombardi trophies since LaFleur arrived as said future HoF quarterback. Soooo…?

6 points
9
3
packerbackerjim's picture

August 09, 2023 at 07:45 am

MLF finally has full accountability for the offense, Barry has full accountability for the defense. Clarity is a good thing.

11 points
11
0
T7Steve's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:27 am

Now! Will they hold them accountable?

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:08 pm

PBJ,

the structure of this organization might remove some of that clarity. I hope MM and Co stay out of it and let the team play. Gutey keeps changing the roster and I have a hard time finding fault with those decisions ...

0 points
2
2
TxFred's picture

August 09, 2023 at 07:47 am

Get that 65% number and we finally end the AR scam era. Damn. Can't wait to finally distance ourselves from that self-serving, hero ball crap, mvp chasing clown.
I hope Barry listens to the defense. Turn them loose let them kick ass & take names. Reimaging is the word for this team. MLF will have his offense, his way. Finally. Tough to stand there & watch that fucking sel- serving SOB do whatever he wanted too. The rest of the team saw this! Not good. MLF's offense & aggressive defense plus RB's ST. Lookout. GPG!!!

8 points
14
6
BradHTX's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:30 am

You know, all due respect, TxFred… A lot of us grew quite tired of AR12’s on- and off-field habits, and were frustrated that we didn’t win more Superb Owls with him as QB (a fact which was partially his fault and partially not for myriad reasons). But honestly… “that f***ing self-serving SOB”? Dial it down a little, there. The “complicated fella” could be annoying or even infuriating at times, but he provided 15 years of quality entertainment for GB fans - and remember, that’s all sports is, entertainment. No sports figure who isn’t a Rae Carruth-style murderer is worth working up that kind of hatred for.

8 points
11
3
croatpackfan's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:10 am

I agree with you BradXTX.

But I also understand TxFred. We should not forget what pleasure we have through first part of FPQB career. But things went south quickly and was so ungreatfull behaviour of FPQB, that were and are turn a lot of people off him.

First he run out of town and postion former HC, the man who teach him everything he knows about football, baring his talent. After that we hear only complaints from FPQB. I did not say that Mike McCarthy time was not overdue at his release, just telling the there is many other, more respectful way to do it. I also believe that two egoist (FPQB and Mark Murphy found themselves) and result was kicking McCarthy a*s out of Green Bay.

For me, FPQB 2 best throws came in one game (2014 or 2015 season) vs Vikings when he sail the ball deep to Jordy in the end zone and both throws went through ears of Vikings DB. I will never forget, also, the throw for the last TD in SB vs Steelers to Greg Jenkins as I remember announcers asked themselves where the hell that ball went through.

But I will never forget that shamefull press conference before TC 2022. I would immediately after that press conference trade FPQB to the worst team in the league for whatever I can get.

For me, I do not hate FPQB, but I realy do not want to talk about him anymore. This is my last post about him and I will never wrote or say anything about him except question: "Who?"

Thank you.

1 points
6
5
Coldworld's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:44 am

We are talking way too much about Rodgers. His play in NY will speak for itself and doesn’t impact what the Packers are doing and how well it will work out now. In hindsight on this season, it may speak loudly, but right now it’s all guesswork that is irrelevant to our current team and prospects.

7 points
9
2
LambeauPlain's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:48 am

I agree. I really want Love to succeed. Just a class act during his tenure at 1265.

3 points
3
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:24 pm

CW,

while I generally agree with your sentiment there are 2 exceptions:

65% and a 3-14 record.

Both would impact the GBP in future seasons but this year it's old news.

2 points
3
1
barutanseijin's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:41 am

Speak for yourself. I found his constipated, stats first style kinda dull.

Also, once you stop believing, the question of him taking a team to a superbowl is moot. There’s no suspense because it’s not going to happen.

Glad to see that fucker gone.

-4 points
3
7
Swisch's picture

August 09, 2023 at 04:59 pm

There's a big difference between anger and hatred.
We can be angry with people without hating them.
We can be angry with people and actually care about them.
Being angry with someone, if handled properly, can actually be a way of loving them.
***
Anyone who truly cared about our former QB12 would not have allowed him to become an arrogant prima donna.
It wasn't good for him, for the players, for the coaches, for the execs, for the fans -- or anyone else.
To pander to him was the easy thing to do, but also the worst thing to do all around.
It allowed him to become a severe source of dysfunction for the Packers, a source of disorder undermining the entire organization.
In this way, our former QB12 became the fault line around which the Packers cracked and crumbled under pressure the pressure of the most important games.
It's one thing to own the Bears, and a good thing, but it seems that there were bigger foes to conquer.
The past three seasons ended in headache and heartbreak, with losses on the shrine of our home field in big games.
***
I wouldn't want to win a Super Bowl by selling out to any player; but selling out to a player virtually guarantees not winning a Super Bowl.
I appreciate that our former QB12 did lots of good things as a Packer, but at the end he did become a self-serving SOB -- did he not?
All the praise he's getting with his new team seems to be for acting in ways completely different than he did with the Packers in recent seasons.
However, he's currently riding a wave in which he seems to be getting just about everything his own way -- and I don't think that ultimately ends well for his new team.
In any case, it's not worth the groveling.
***
Let's hope it's a lesson learned for the Packers, though.
Winners require talent, but also character.
I feel exhilarated, and eminently grateful, that the sick feeling in the pit of my stomach due to the past dysfunction caused by QB12 is apparently alleviated with his departure.
I sense a lot of fans here at CHTV feel much the same way.
It's not that we hate the guy, but we hate the way he treated us as fans of the Packers.
For one thing, he was ready to walk out on us if he didn't get his own domineering way. He was willing to abandon his teammates, too.
Ours is a justifiable anger -- not in the least bit hatred -- and it's healthy to vent it out within reasonable limits.

-2 points
2
4
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 06:23 pm

Bravo, Swisch!

I don’t even have anger towards Aaron Rodgers. He’s sick. But, I’ve felt my favorite team since Lombardi had been commandeered by a once great QB turned petulant prick, for years. That literally made me sick too.

Have known a bunch of insider stuff on Favre for decades as well, and he’s a first rate tool. Unfortunate.

The bigger thing to me here is it’s OK if you have a huge love for these guys, for their play over the course of 30 years. I get that. I have a lot of friends who feel that way here and elsewhere. We can agree to disagree respectfully. We’re all Packer fans.

Trolls are another story. The “hater,” attacks are just wrong.

I feel exhilarated too, Swisch, now that we have our team back, with what I suspect to be a better QB1 candidate taking over than the last two. The team seems to be riding good confidence, respect for their teammates, and seem bought into the best aspects of TEAM play & principles.

-1 points
2
3
Swisch's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:27 pm

Thanks for the good and supportive comment, gg.
I really hate it when those of us who are rightfully angry with Rodgers are called haters . . . er, um . . . I mean I'm angry that we're called haters.
***
While I don't expect anyone to be perfect, including our players on the Packers, the thing about Rodgers is that his waywardness was directly harming his teammates and the fans.
When he held out before the 2021 season, he was basically abandoning his teammates and the fans.
When he finally came back, his reasons for staying away didn't seem all that compelling to me as real matters of principle, but rather excuses for his own arrogance and dominance.
***
Yet, to criticize Rodgers for jerking us around is considered hateful?
To me, to allow Rodgers to impose his egomania on the Packers was spineless.
It didn't help anyone, including Rodgers.
To allow abusers to abuse never does.

3 points
3
0
packerfanroy's picture

August 10, 2023 at 07:06 pm

You don't know anything about Arod. You have never met him or anybody who knows him well. You know what the media narrative is. I don't know Arod for the exact same reasons but Im not on this board posting about what a fantastic human being Arod is. Because I dont know, how would I? When it comes to football though, all the greats who have coached/played with and against him all say the same thing. For Packer fans to be angry at that guy is fucking stupid. Arod was the biggest reason for GBP success.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:15 pm

TxFred,

are we to surmise that you were ready to move on to the 'Love era?'

Lol.

I would've liked to have seen JL10 play last season while AR12 heals, and a few other changes the last few years. We've also had articles and discussion about what went wrong 2011-2018, and those turned up interesting factors.

Now, we can look forward to some redemption for those mistakes, maybe over the next decade or more :) "It's a building year," and it will be full of surprises ...

4 points
4
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

August 09, 2023 at 03:30 pm

Well that self serving hero pretty much saved an "okay" roster over most of the last decade and if not for underperforming defenses, they may have won even more games. Do you forget that it wasn't just wining the MVP? It was the TEAM winning 13 games for 3 seasons in a row. GB has one of the winningest franchises in the NFL during the last decade plus, and that's not due to the UDFA WRs, the aging TEs, etc. Rodgers overcame a lot of deficits on the roster, even if in the end he didn't appear to elevate his game during recent playoff runs. But injuries and coaching factored into those losses as well.

I'm so sorry it was tough to watch them win so many games. Until last year it has been an excellent ride for my viewing pleasure. I stay out of the off the field stuff; I listen to the teammates speak well of Rodgers, like the departed Micah Hyde: “I love 12. That’s my guy,” Hyde said. He added, “He’s a loving, great person. He’s one of the best teammates I ever had.”

Winning stats per champs or chumps. Let's see what the Love era brings. I know I'm not complaining about the Rodgers era.

NFL Team Stats, 2010 - 2023
Rank Team Record Win Percentage Made Playoffs Playoff Game Wins Titles
1 New England Patriots 150-60 71.4% 11 16 3
2 Green Bay Packers 136-72-2 65.2% 10 11 1
3 Kansas City Chiefs 136-74 64.8% 10 12 2

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

August 09, 2023 at 07:47 am

I’m looking to see what this O is without Rodgers. I’m looking to see signs that LaFleur is an innovative mind that can take the system he came from and produce a form of it that is effective 5 seasons later, during which defenses have adapted.

I’m also looking to see if LaFleur can demonstrate tactical acumen to win the coaching battle both going into and during games. That was something he consistently failed to do before the evaporation of the “illusion of complexity” approach we saw after 2021.

Then there’s the issue of the coaching staff as a whole and personnel management. How well do the likes of Barry, Stenovich, Butkus and co perform in the roles they now hold? How do they use players and adapt to performance. Will we see widespread growth from players?

As to Nijman. I’d rather wait to see what we have in guys like Caleb Jones. Yes, that’s in part emblematic of a fear that these coaches are reluctant to blood new talent, just as they were this time last year with Tom.

I currently feel the 4 best OL players are Bakh, Jenkins, Tom and Nijman. I want them all playing. If Bakh can’t consistently, then I think we have to be honest with ourselves and face that and maybe get some value for him and ho with a settled line. If we believe that’s an outside risk then Nijman should be playing. If, as many think, the run game is now more critical, the fact that he’s proved himself a plus run blocker shouldn’t get lost either.

C is both the position Tom was generally thought best suited for by “experts” and the one Gute cited as in his mind when drafting him. The center of our line was our weakest link after the crazy start to last year when Tom was not tried or Nijman trained at RT in favor of Newman and Hanson … yes, I still struggle to get over that thinking/fear of trying young talent when no older talent existed even when proved totally flawed.

No, I don’t want Tom at RT absent a complete revelation from Myers. I want Tom protecting the quickest route to Love and any between the tackles run. If Runyon remains at RG, I do not want two weak players in the run and in goal line together. Not only do I want Love upright and healthy but I want us able to run between the tackles. That’s a huge boost to the O and to the chances of a clean throwing pocket.

Push the weakest incumbents. Competition helps. Let them prove it or lose it. Do not shirk from challenging players to get better or from having to make changes if they are surpassed. Winning requires leaving no stone unturned to get the best out there on the field. LaFleur and his staff seem to struggle with that and too often avoid the contest out of fear of the answer. That’s a way to guarantee we will be worse than we should be. Now is the single best time to do this.

We need to grow as a team this year. That starts with facing our weaknesses and being willing to try to get better not to just accept experienced band aids. That, for me, starts with seeing if Tom is our best C and either moving Nijman and trusting Bakh or giving Jones a genuine shot now. To me that’s one window into the chances of LaFleur proving to be a coach for the future.

Don’t play afraid, particularly this year, and be prepared to try youth. It’s all around you anyway: embrace potential, run with it. Don’t settle for familiarity that’s not been good enough. This is a year to get better, to develop around a new QB. The roster is young and inexperienced. There no point in being afraid just because Gute hasn’t forced it. Especially when, as currently, every team knows that the Packers OL is most vulnerable at C/RG.

That’s the thinking that led us to Newman and Hanson being paired and to the idiocy of the OL changes for the last Championship game. It’s the thinking that kept putting Amari out there till the GM released him and forced a change. To keeping rolling out Watkins till the GM prevented that too. Not playing Wyatt till Lowry was hurt … there is a track record of these failings, a long list. LaFleur has growing to do. Here’s a good place to start.

13 points
15
2
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:26 am

CW,
As usual....excellent perspective! Insightful!

1 points
3
2
MooPack's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:06 am

"Don’t play afraid, particularly this year, and be prepared to try youth. It’s all around you anyway: embrace potential, run with it. Don’t settle for familiarity that’s not been good enough. This is a year to get better, to develop around a new QB. The roster is young and inexperienced. There no point in being afraid just because Gute hasn’t forced it. Especially when, as currently, every team knows that the Packers OL is most vulnerable at C/RG."

^This!
Fear is a killer. Now is the time to let them fail, but learn and overcome the adversities.

I'm also of the opinion that all players (vets included) should play at least a couple series to a quarter of every games of pre-season football. I don't believe the fear of injury overrides the reward of getting all players on the same page against teams other than their own D that sees the plays coming day in/ day out. Get them up to game speed, padded hits, against another teams aggressiveness. I actually think in season injuries can be lessened if the players are ready for full contact before that 1st game. You can be held out all pre-season, walk out on the field that first game and be injured. We've seen it happen. That fear mentality is useless.

5 points
5
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:32 am

"I’m also looking to see if LaFleur can demonstrate tactical acumen to win the coaching battle both going into and during games."

EXACTLY!!! PLAY TO YOUR STRENGTHS. EXPLOIT OPPONENT WEAKNESSES.

Love's first start was a well groomed clipboard wielding blooper real, in terms of game planning. I've yet to fully recover from that debacle by Matt LaFleur.

KC had the NFL's WORST run defense AND one of the NFL's BEST pass rushes. GB was starting their former 1st Round pick at QB1 for the first time.

RUN THE ROCK!!!!!!

LaFleur needs to check himself, and not make the game more difficult than it needs to be, ie: being consumed with the pass happy moniker more often wrongfully afforded to "offensive geniuses." Bill Walsh & Mike Martz ran the football A TON!!! So does Bill Belichick!!! Count the rings, Matt LaFleur - AND RUN THE ROCK!!!

Aaron Jones had 12 carries. AJ Dillon had 8 carries... we lost that game 13-7.

The onus is on Matt LaFleur to insure this never happens again. Play to your strengths and exploit opponent weaknesses. ALWAYS. And, FFS, take the heat off your QB1 by insisting on a strong Packers rushing attack. This is where the Center and Right Guard battles may come into play. WE NEED MAULERS!!!

THAT will help Jordan Love to be successful in his first year at QB1, while at the same time giving the 2023 Packers their best chance to WIN GAMES.

2 points
5
3
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:34 pm

GG,

this perspective remains as valid as it was last season. Hopefully MLF and Co have not lost sight of this.

Hopefully the depth chart released is just a "we've got to put something out there," and is NOT a signal that roster competition has ended. The ability to run the ball from anywhere on the field is essential. (Minus the end arounds none of us want to see)

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:04 pm

SST, I can't say RUN THE ROCK without some not liking the idea. TFB.

I looked back further on that day, and I think Matt LaFleur was all full of his "offensive genius" pass happy self.

Aaron Jones had only 12 carries for 53 yds, and a 4.4ypc average. Dillon had 8 for 46 and a 5.8 (!!!) ypc average.

***TOGETHER, Jones & Dillon should be splitting at a MINIMUM of 30 carries/game.

How do you NOT RUN in those conditions? FFS, GET THE WIN! Arrowhead is only one of the hardest places for anyone to play in, not to mention a QB making his first start, and MLF did him no favors. Nor did he do himself any favors that day. It was a piss poor job of Head Coaching.

***KEY WORD: TACTICAL. The Chiefs had the WORST Run D in the NFL.

We should have walked out of Arrowhead that day with a W. Maybe AR gets traded a year earlier then...??? How differently things might have gone...

The only GENIUS Matt LaFleur needs to be is to understand his team's strengths, a high quality OL and TWO Top RBs, and use them liberally FOR. THE. WIN. Don't worry about the passing game. That will come with a strong rushing attack, forcing defenders to load the box, while we then throw over it.

He's going to be all the GENIUS he'll ever want to be if he can bring home that Lombardi Trophy this year by doing just that.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:50 am

Newman and Hansen....

Do you think it's the old "we have to start the seniors" mentality from high school and college?

Was it what they considered the safe choice? Also, what did our former QB have to say about it? Were they his favorites?

It really cost us some games last season and earlier playoff games.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:41 am

They can both leave and no one would miss them...

3 points
4
1
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:56 am

I don't think Hanson was ever an NFL-caliber player.

Newman is fine as OL 7-9, but utterly replaceable. Shades of Don Barclay.

3 points
3
0
mnbadger's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:10 pm

Why so mean to Don Barclay?
He had a couple of well played games at critical times as I recall. Bad knees got to him too early.
GPG!

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:43 pm

"The old we have to start the seniors mentality" is the exact opposite of play the yutes, which is again different from merit determining the roster.

I'm in favor of using preseason games to help determine both the roster and starters. Hopefully that's what they actually do, I've heard things that I consider good signs on this front but I'm admittedly anxious about it.

Not long to wait now ...

3 points
4
1
GregC's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:21 am

You make a good argument for starting Zach Tom at center. I hope the coaches give him a good long look there in training camp to see if our D-linemen look like superstars against him, as they often do against Josh Myers. It seems like potentially there could be a bigger difference in quality between Tom and Myers than there is between Tom and Nijman.

6 points
6
0
T7Steve's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:35 am

Tom has the size to be an outstanding center. That he can play all the line positions, is a help but could be a curse. Last season I was shocked when Jenkins struggled at tackle. Even if it was because he was just coming back from his injury, I'm glad they're now keeping him where he's at his best. As someone here commented previously, let's get five starters playing (and practicing) in one place consistently. I don't want to be satisfied with an average NFL line. I want the best. Let the backups jump around if they can, to find who's best and for the future.

Nijman and Jones have the size to be the bookends now and into the future.

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:51 pm

Greg, this is my thinking too. I'm startled by the depth chart released so far, and am trying not to take it seriously. Would love to know current weight and strength of Tom vs Myers, and MLF and the rest of the staff should have all that info. Another factor is Nijman embraces playing both left and right tackle positions, and he'll apparently be in that backup role at least per the current thinking. Which doesn't mean he'll succeed equally everywhere and anywhere. I also see him as one of the best 5 easily, and certainly not a weak spot unless his skill suffers from playing out of position.

I honestly wish Mt Caleb's best position was C, that'd make so many things easier! Apparently he doesn't have that skill. Him and Nijman at T next year with Tom at C? Hopefully there are 10 GREAT O linemen emerging on the current roster ...

2 points
2
0
GregC's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:46 pm

Another factor is that there have been a lot of fumbled snaps with Myers in training camp already. Hopefully this is not an ongoing issue though, as it was not a problem last season. Maybe the problem is with the young QBs (including Jordan Love).

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:51 pm

It's not just Myers....

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:54 am

This^^. The best OL includes Yosh and Zach with Bakh and Jenks. RG? See if Myers can beat out Runyan or Rhyan. I cannot add anything more to your comment, Cold. Good analysis.

5 points
5
0
CheeseEdWest2's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:39 pm

You said it straight, brother.

2 points
2
0
joejetson's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:00 pm

Coldworld, totally agree about LaFluer being afraid to pull the trigger on replacing underperforming veterans. I'll add one more example to your list- Kevin King. They even brought him back for another year after he pretty much cost them the NFC Championship Game vs Tampa Bay.

1 points
1
0
Tundraboy's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:33 pm

Wow spot on

"Don’t play afraid, particularly this year, and be prepared to try youth. It’s all around you anyway: embrace potential, run with it. Don’t settle for familiarity that’s not been good enough. This is a year to get better, to develop around a new QB."

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

August 09, 2023 at 07:51 am

Two things here evident, Rodgers the asshole screwed for whatever he wanted and now seeing the changes Rodgers refused to do and showed the prick he was. This motion is going to be great addition to the offensive scheme intitiated!

5 points
13
8
coolhand's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:07 am

Interesting how the Packer's offense got stale under both McCarthy and then last year under MLF the more AR took over and called his own plays.

8 points
11
3
Packers0808's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:22 am

Guess would be when Rodgers retires he won't be hired as a play calling head coach in NFL.

7 points
7
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:53 pm

I'm interested in seeing the Jets play for exactly this reason, to determine just how much of a factor this is.

5 points
5
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:46 am

Don't sugar coat it, Packers0808. Come out and say it!

5 points
5
0
Packers0808's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:12 am

Because Rodgers is an ass?

0 points
4
4
Bitternotsour's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:11 pm

when it walks, swims and quacks like a duck, it's most likely a duck...

0 points
1
1
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:01 pm

...AND A WITCH!!!

2 points
2
0
LeotisHarris's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:45 pm

She turned me into a newt!

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:53 pm

You got better?

0 points
0
0
Vachio's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:08 am

That it took so long for Barry to have a meeting like this is probably the most damning indictment of his performance. Why wasn't a meeting like that step #1?

11 points
12
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:26 am

V,
Ain't that the truth!

4 points
4
0
mnbadger's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:16 pm

Vachio, that's why I question if mlf has the stones to be a HC.
Everything I've seen so far says NO, as in . . .
No in game adjustments.
No real leadership skills
No ability to manage the clock.
No ability to manage timeouts
No ability to manage challenge situations
No ability to hold HIS staff accountable
Sorry, but our HC is my biggest concern about 2023 by a long margin.
I hope I'm wrong, we'll see soon enough, thankfully.
GPG!

4 points
4
0
LeotisHarris's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:23 am

The CHTV watch party sounds like a good time. Three colonoscopies ago, the physician guiding the scope up my rear end was Dr Ramage. I shit you not. Talk about being called to a vocation!

8 points
8
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:28 am

Leo,
You never dissapoint! 😀

3 points
3
0
CheesedDeadHead's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:25 am

I heard he did his best work in an Ashram.

4 points
4
0
Spock's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:05 am

Leotis, After a colonoscopy "I shit you not." sounds about right. :)

5 points
5
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:52 am

Spock always with the spot on color commentary. LOL

1 points
1
0
crayzpackfan's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:35 pm

LeotisHarris - I'm not at all trying to probe into this conversation anymore than I have to, but with a name like Dr. Ramage, just be grateful You didn't feel two hands on your shoulders right before you went out. I seriously didn't want reply, but when push comes to shove, I tend to go all in, while trying to narrow the scope of the conversation. It makes it easier to see through all the shit, you know? GPG

2 points
2
0
LeotisHarris's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:40 pm

I feel you, man. I had no such concerns. Know why? His first name was Jack.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:48 pm

The one with the MASH UNIT? Better known as Major Jack Ramage?

"If feel you, man." wins all the style points for today. 100% I can't stop laughing.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:56 pm

LMMFAO

1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

August 09, 2023 at 08:39 am

On the move -
I absolutely love that we will be seeing more motion and utilizing the players we have all over the field. What I like more is that they have the players that can do it naturally. Watson can do it and be effective. But a guy like Reed can absolutely be a weapon when put into motion. Another guy that I think would be great in it is Goodson. He has the speed and could be a big time weapon in this role.

Keep Yosh on the Bench -
I prefer Tom at RT. I think he is our best RT and I think Myers is fine at OC. I like Yosh, but I like having a proven backup at OT. I think Yosh is better at LT then RT also. We need someone ready to go in at LT at any point right now.

Pressure Points -
I just don't want to be seeing players playing 10 yards off when its a 3rd and 3. They want to play aggressive then be aggressive.

Workhorse -
Gary could be the key to our defense. Before he got hurt the defense was one of the top pass rush units. After he got hurt, one of the worst. They got some new players but if Gary returns to form, this could be a dynamic front.

Knock It Off -
Only way I will watch the show is if it is including GB. I just don't have any interest in it.

4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:25 am

" What I like more is that they have the players that can do it naturally. "

Jet sweeps and WR screens to Geronimo Allison and Allen Lazard...ugh.

"Another guy that I think would be great in it is Goodson."

They're going to run Jones and Dillon, and Goodson has looked better in pass pro (apparently), but he's not likely to be the one they trust regularly with protecting Love. Some players get put on the field and it telegraphs exactly what they're going to do....I think barring an injury that leads to extended snaps, Goodson's a limited-role player (if he makes the 53). Would you rather give those opportunities to Goodson or to Reed/Toure?

"Before he got hurt the defense was one of the top pass rush units. After he got hurt, one of the worst. "

They were 5-3 after Gary got hurt last season, and the average margin of loss in the three losses was 7 points (10, 7, and 4). They were in all of those games. They couldn't find ways to win them.

In the end, OLB might turn out to be the strongest unit on the team when Gary gets into game shape. Assuming LVN isn't overwhelmed, they've got 5 guys who can play.

2 points
2
0
RCPackerFan's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:28 am

"Jet sweeps and WR screens to Geronimo Allison and Allen Lazard...ugh."

Seriously. I know there was a lot of talk about them not doing it much the last couple of years or as much when they brought in Ervin. But they really didn't have a guy that could do it like they do now.

"They're going to run Jones and Dillon, and Goodson has looked better in pass pro (apparently), but he's not likely to be the one they trust regularly with protecting Love. Some players get put on the field and it telegraphs exactly what they're going to do....I think barring an injury that leads to extended snaps, Goodson's a limited-role player (if he makes the 53). Would you rather give those opportunities to Goodson or to Reed/Toure?"

I'm a huge Goodson fan. I was hoping he'd make the 53 last year. Because I felt he could provide the Ervin role to the offense. Goodson is a weapon. He can run and catch. He is fast to use on jet motions. He can line up in the backfield and out wide. He would be great in the 2 RB sets. They like to use 2 RB sets a decent amount. If they only have 2 RB's they are limited to how much they can use. He is a matchup piece that they can really take advantage of if they wanted to.
I expect Reed to do a lot of motion. But he won't play every snap. I don't feel Toure is shifty enough to be great in that role. Sure he can do it, but it wouldn't be as good as Goodson doing it.
I just feel that Goodson could be a major weapon. Sure they have other guys that are weapons. They have Jones, Dillon, Watson, Doubs, Reed, Musgrave. But I think Goodson could carve out a great role in the offense that just makes us more dangerous.

"In the end, OLB might turn out to be the strongest unit on the team when Gary gets into game shape. Assuming LVN isn't overwhelmed, they've got 5 guys who can play."
I really like our OLB room right now. (assuming Gary is back to himself).
But the part I like about the OLB this year is not even the players at the OLB. Its players on the DL. I think they have added some guys that will apply pressure in the middle which will allow the OLB to do more. Wyatt, Wooden, Brooks I think are going to provide a boost in the front. We have to see how they look once games start, but I feel like they could provide a boost compared to the previous years.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:28 am

I agree dobber. The Packers OLB position might have 6 guys who can play if Brenton Cox Jr. gets uncorked. I get the sense Cox Jr. and LVN share the same qualities in that you're not going to really see what they can do until it's "GAME ON!"

TE Tucker Kraft said that's a regular occurrence in how he plays, and all of his previous coaches know it.

I'm wondering if that isn't also the case with Anthony Johnson Jr., Tarvarius Moore and Jonathan Owens?

On Goodson, man... he's going to be a very tough call knowing he gives us ZERO ST value. With the Packers, if you can't play teams, you generally don't make the 53. Andy Herman says he makes his 53, can't keep him off it because he makes plays everywhere. I tend to agree, but, every roster spot is at a premium. A lot of tough calls will be made in about 3 weeks time.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:08 am

"you're not going to really see what they can do until it's "GAME ON!""

Absolutely--which is the caution against falling in love with big guys before the pads go on and they can grind.

"I'm wondering if that isn't also the case with Anthony Johnson Jr., Tarvarius Moore and Jonathan Owens?"

Glad to see competition and movement in the S depth chart. Ford might be OK at one S spot, but I'm happier seeing guys earn that spot. Johnson might end up on the PS (maybe he can gun?) but there's not likely to be a run on him if the Packers put him there. Leavitt really is a S in name only--he brings almost no positional value to the team.

"On Goodson, man... he's going to be a very tough call knowing he gives us ZERO ST value."

You'd presume he could be groomed to return kicks, but that only puts him second on the depth chart. Taylor plays STs, which earned him a spot last year, but it's been very quiet on him in this camp. Nichols and Wilson are bigger guys and that translates better to STs, not to mention Wilson has had some good looks. Goodson's just going to have to win that spot outright.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:21 am

It’s always going to be quiet with a power back till there are pads and contact in earnest. They can’t show their strong suit. Goodson was always going to stand out (if one ignored Jones).

Now the healthy traditional backs will have their chance to show what they can do on offense and all get to protect for real. The same is true of TE Davis and his blocking. We will see if it’s truly effective and consistent.

For some the battle and opportunity starts now. Personally, I’d add the safety group to that and the DL versus the run and OL running it.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:38 am

Yep. Joint practices today and tomorrow (?) should be telling to some degree, but that 1st preseason game has different rules in place, and will be our first real read on the ol' barometer.

CIN OL ranked #16 Overall at Football Outsiders for 2022, giving up 44 sacks. Green Bay's ranked #2 Overall, giving up 32 sacks. The Bengals added much needed help to their OL by signing LT Orlando Brown from KC this offseason.

CIN DL ranked #15 Overall, with 30 sacks. Green Bay's DL ranked #32 Overall, with 34 sacks. This last bit really points to how much we needed to add RUN STOP all along our defensive front. Time for all of Wyatt, Ford, Brooks, Wooden et al to shine.

Like the Packers drafting LVN, the Bengals drafted pass rush help with Myles Murphy at #28. The Bengals also went S/DB heavy in the draft, taking S/CB DJ Turner at #60 and S Jordan Battle at #95, along with R7 pick DJ Ivey this year.

1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:28 am

"On Goodson, man... he's going to be a very tough call knowing he gives us ZERO ST value. With the Packers, if you can't play teams, you generally don't make the 53. Andy Herman says he makes his 53, can't keep him off it because he makes plays everywhere. I tend to agree, but, every roster spot is at a premium. A lot of tough calls will be made in about 3 weeks time."

I look at it this way. If you have a guy that is capable of being a playmaker, you can't get rid of him. That is Goodson. He is a playmaker waiting to happen. If he has some deficiency's then get him into roles that take away those.
As far as special teams goes, they can always bring up players from the PS if they feel they need more players to help.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:12 pm

The Packers are running more 21 personnel this year, so I could easily see Goodson as one of those two RBs, lessening any impact on pass pro a bit, should it come to that.

We're not used to 2 back sets with the Packers over much of the last decade. I'm looking forward to seeing that.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:37 am

If we play Goodson he’s got to be either the true 3rd back and truly trusted in pass pro—without full contact testing that’s yet to be meaningfully tested in my opinion—or he’s got to be a hybrid 4th back/receiver.

Last year I wanted him to be the latter. This year, with Reed, maybe Nixon and Watson, he’s going to have to prove he’s the best option in the slot/option role in order to be active. Absent injuries, they seem to have enough WR talent that will be active to make me wonder how they fit that on the active roster given that he’s seemingly not pushing for inclusion as a gunner or returner.

There is a way to go yet. Better awareness in camp may translate into efficacy in protection in preseason, but if not, it’s going to be interesting with the amount of talent, speed and ball in hand ability in the receiver corps. I hope we can find a way to use his talents. I’m not convinced that this roster makes that easy, but nor am I convinced that LaFleur has the imagination to find a way through this conundrum that may not be standard. He surely whiffed on this completely last year when the need was egregious.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:37 pm

If Gary makes game one, the OLB and OL would be the best two groups on the field IMO. Rush the passer and protect Love. Works for me!

I was not very enthusiastic when Gary was drafted. I am very happy to admit I was wrong. His talent is top shelf...and his work ethic is too. Great Packer.

2 points
2
0
Tundraboy's picture

August 09, 2023 at 06:14 pm

"graphs exactly what they're going to do....I think barring an injury that leads to extended snaps, Goodson's a limited-role player (if he makes the 53). Would you rather give those opportunities to Goodson or to Reed/Toure?"

Hell yeah that's easy. Toure / Reed

1 points
1
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:02 pm

RCP,

"I like Yosh, but I like having a proven backup at OT. I think Yosh is better at LT then RT also. We need someone ready to go in at LT at any point right now."

This is the best reasoning to support the current depth chart wrt O line. Although I'll raise a bone of contention about Myers at C, I've seen him get beaten last year and this. I can hope he's stronger and better now.

Mt Caleb continues to be under rated. All I saw him do at practice was dominate. I'm not suggesting he should start, but I don't see him as a weakness at depth. He's one who would benefit from pregame snaps.

0 points
1
1
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:01 am

On the move...
With the amount of motion the Packers ran the last few years and a likely vanilla preseason, these are going to mostly be unscouted looks for Packers opponents without having to sweep out big chunks of the playbook. It creates some real opportunities for Love to be ahead of opposing defenses.

"I would think that pre-snap motion can force the defense to tip their hand as to what scheme the are running that play,"

Every time you make a defense process what their seeing, shift, hand off a motioning receiver, or communicate adjustments in coverage you create a greater chance for significant breakdowns that result in chunk plays. 12 seemed to want to play chess from the backfield while the rest of the league has been playing air hockey.

"Keep Yosh on the Bench"

I understand this reasoning, and it's logical. Sometimes minimal disruptions result in the best outcomes, but that presumes injury. Do the Packers see Nijman as the heir-apparent at LT? If so, hiding him on the bench likely makes him a cheaper re-sign as opposed to playing full time at RT. They need to figure out who is backing up those IOL positions on game day. Newman can play G. Rhyan? My understanding was that they were cross-training Rhyan at C, but I've heard little of it during this camp.

I'm really curious what this line is going to end up looking like in 2024 after Bakh is (likely) gone and they've been forced to make decisions on JRJ and Nijman. We keep pointing to Myers as the weak link, but he's good in pass protection and struggles in the run game--as does JRJ. Putting those two guys together compounds issues in the run game. I'm hoping someone pushes JRJ so the Packers know exactly what they have when they have to decide on a new contract for him.

"Pressure Points"

Barry needs to win that position group over after 2022 (and 2021), but I think having Jerry Gray out of the room will help. The bottom line, though, is that Barry can't put together extended stretches of good play with his defenses. There are multi-game stretches in each season where they look pretty good, and stretches where they look pretty lousy. He's coaching for his job. He's got players with pedigrees...they need to turn that into production.

6 points
8
2
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:45 am

Well said.

Your Myers and JRJ comments are on point. Both good, solid pass protectors. As a Center, you're helping both the LG and RG at times while handling your own assignments. I'm wondering if inserting Rhyan into that starting RG position wouldn't help Myers with his run blocking? It's possible. Rhyan had an 86.1 Run Blocking grade from PFF while at UCLA, and a Pass Blocking grade of 75.5 (on par with that of Runyan's pass blocking 77.0). Put that next to Myers and maybe things change for the better in the run blocking dept.

2 points
2
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:10 pm

GG, maybe. Too much of a risk to swap out both Myers and JRJ at the same time with JL10 on the field in preseason games. Once success is established it could be tried one piece at a time, or with the twos. I very much think this issue needs to be explored during preseason games. Somehow. One or the other of these two might be a weak link. Or both? It's time to find out, as well as test the depth behind them.

0 points
2
2
GregC's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:29 am

"Do the Packers see Nijman as the heir-apparent at LT? If so, hiding him on the bench likely makes him a cheaper re-sign as opposed to playing full time at RT."

I suppose so, but if I was a player and my team did this to me, I would get out of town as soon as I could.

3 points
3
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:05 pm

MLF always says "we will play the best 5." That's mostly just a fluffy bromide from him. I simply do not see evidence of this. Too many examples where he did not follow his words with action.

When the strength of the team is OL, IMO...you don't shelve one of your best OL players on the bench for future cap games. Love, the RBs need the best run blockers playing synergistically as a unit if the IOC strategy is fully employed, meaning more reliance on the infantry.

7 points
7
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:12 pm

LP,

this is exactly what my biggest concern has been all off-season and why I went to practices. I have no answers and hope to attend 3 more ...

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:21 pm

Maybe we can meet up a week from Thursday? My wife & I are popping up for that last joint practice with NE.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

August 09, 2023 at 04:18 pm

Look forward to you and G&G filing your field reports!

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 04:35 pm

LP, when I go up and watch practices, it's kinda like my eyeballs are looking all over the field at different position groups. SicSemperTyrannis is going to have NO PROBLEM finding me, because I'll probably look exactly like Marty Feldman.

Seriously, I always hope I leave practice without looking like Marty Feldman. But, it's a workout for the eyes, and head on a swivel the whole time. I've always wanted to catch as much of the action as possible to share with my friends around the country/world who can't make it, making mental notes of every little thing.

Then I go to Kroll's, sit at the bar with a couple burgers & cold ones, and write every last thing I can recall.

I think this year I may just enjoy it a bit more. Taking my wife with me for the first time to a practice... we usually go to games together, but, practices for me was always a purposeful adventure! I'll hit you with what I can.

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:13 pm

Yes I agree Dobber.... Keep Yosh on the bench, he was repeatedly beaten by Kings Engab and Lukas Vness during practices, he doesn't anchor well against bull and always seems off balance against speed .... he certainly looks the part but doesn't play the part

-1 points
1
2
CheesedDeadHead's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:17 am

I can't wait for the first snap with at least 5 seconds left on the play clock - the Packers shove a startled defense 5 feet off the line of scrimmage and Jones is off to the races or Watson and Doubs are 5 yards past the defenders before they realize the ball was snapped.

7 points
7
0
dobber's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:47 am

"I can't wait for the first snap with at least 5 seconds left on the play clock "

From your keyboard to God's LED display...

That said, I think that this team's offensive philosophy is predicated on shortening games, limiting possessions/controlling the clock, and being efficient with the football. I don't think that will change much in 2023...I just hope they do snap with 3-5 seconds more than 0-1.

1 points
1
0
ImaPayne's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:44 am

I like some motion but it can be over done and the timing is critical and may cause motion penalties that set you back. Second, teams watch films and it doesnt take long to get the gist of the motion and what to defend. Your not fooling anyone at this level. To me and the KC chiefs prove it over and over again, its speed that kills.
If you cant put speed on the field on both sides of the ball your at a disadvantage on offense and defense. Motion doesnt make up for it IMO of course

1 points
3
2
jannes bjornson's picture

August 10, 2023 at 07:55 am

See: 4th and One, Dbl reverse @ Midfield, no gain for comparative analysis. I would be more impressed if LaFleur knew how to draw up a draw/trap play.

0 points
0
0
packerfanroy's picture

August 10, 2023 at 06:33 pm

I couldnt agree more about KC and speed. It seems that Reid's system is not just better with speed but designed to excel only if u have that elite speed. I think that was the problem with Nagy's scheme in CHI. He tried to copy KC but didnt have the speed guys required so the timing of the route concepts was always off and the offense fell apart. Obviously there was alot more wrong with Nagy and those teams but i think that was a big part of it.

That does highlight another bonus to the Reid system. Its hard to replicate because there arent to many guys out there that are elite fast AND good enough at the other aspects of playing WR at the pro level. Probably why they valued MVS more than the packers.

0 points
0
0
Zapato's picture

August 09, 2023 at 10:51 am

If I may be so bold, I'd like to offer one reason for optimism this upcoming season. Matt LaFleur supposedly runs the same style offense that Kyle Shanahan does in San Fransisco. Jimmy Garoppolo, Trey Lance and Brock Purdy all fared well under this system. These three aren't bad quarterbacks, but I haven't heard anyone extolling their incredible talents or Hall of Fame futures either. I think Jordan Love entered the league with a better talent dossier than any of those guys and he's had three years to refine his skills and learn the system. So, shouldn't one expect that Jordan Love would be successful as well? Granted, there will be a fair amount of differentiation from the Shanahan system, but I'm keeping my outlook higher than a failed QB or season.

Regardless of how the offensive line plays out, I think they'll be good if they can stay healthy. Still have hope for big improvements from Walker and Jones. I'm curious how they'd perform in a regular season game. But, not pushing for it! :-)

Somethings gotta change in Barry's defense and this was the first piece of evidence I've heard that maybe something will. I'd love to see DBs close to the line on third and short instead of ten yards away.

Still freaking out that Gary is off the PUP list so soon! I still don't expect to see him week 1 (or 3). I'm just glad he's making great strides.

Could care less about Hard Knocks!

Would love to attend the watch party. The only thing keeping me from it is the 23-hour drive to and from.

4 points
4
0
jannes bjornson's picture

August 10, 2023 at 08:00 am

Like you said, he doesn't run Shanahan's defense.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:33 am

"Rasul Douglas said, "We basically told him we want to be aggressive. We want to be up close in guys’ faces and we want to challenge and make throws tight.” “So far,” Rasul added, “that’s what he’s doing.”"

Best news on Joe Berry I have heard in years.

4 points
4
0
splitpea1's picture

August 09, 2023 at 11:43 am

Reed is behind Toure in the early depth chart, so we'll see how quickly that evolves. I really do hope he does become that chess piece, and that includes some shots downfield. Most of his snaps in college came on the outside, so he has plenty of experience there. This is going to be a fast offense, and once they start putting it together collectively they're going to be a lot of fun to watch.

On defense, I liked Alexander's quote as well: "Joe Barry can call whatever he wants to, but at the end of the day, we have to execute that call." I just liked the acknowledgment of responsibility here that sometimes you have to be able to adapt in order to get the job done. So it goes both ways.

6 points
7
1
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

August 09, 2023 at 01:20 pm

SP,

I see #9 as possibly not getting many targets but lots of yards and TDs. It wouldn't surprise me if Reed and Musgrave get more targets. 5 - 8 yard "dumpoffs" can win games! Positive yardage + YAC rather than throwing behind the los and getting stuffed and 3 & out.

Getting the ball out fast will be JL10's bread and butter until the O line establishes itself as reliably dominant. Winning is possible both ways, in many of the games on this year's schedule.

We'll see what kind of strategy MLF goes with, and pretty soon!

0 points
2
2
LambeauPlain's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:19 pm

Al...you always get the comments going! Always look forward to your column.

I like it that Nixon is looking to man the slot. He has been quite a find, thanks to Coach Rich. And the fact Rich probably has a solid relationship with Nixon should help in taking the pulse of the Defense if the Assist. HC is involved with the D this season. I see Barry is moving to he coaches box this season, leaving Bicassia on the field...hopefully helping to manage in game adjustments to the D as well as coaching STs.

Regarding Yosh, he is one of the best run blocking OL in the NFL, not just on the Packers. For a team that appears to want to focus more on the ground, not starting him if he is one of the best 5 is a big negative for team's success.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

August 09, 2023 at 04:24 pm

Absolutely. Get your best 5 out there whenever you can. Prepare them to switch if there’s an injury, but don’t waste games from your best players. If Nijman is needed at LT, then either Tom can move from C or we bring in Jones.

That is if we’ve actually had the nerve to try Jones seriously that we lacked with Tom or Nijman at RT despite the opportunity to give them reps. Will we Repeat those mistakes with Jones, perhaps Rhyan?

The “sit a guy in case of injury” or due to perceived optimal long term position is nuts. Then again, this is the coaching staff whose nutty ideas on the best 5 in the last championship game probably blew out last chance of a last dance hoorah. Play your best available combination as much as you can. Know your options if you cant and prepare them in case if need. Don’t just go to
The backup in case it’s needed before it is.

0 points
1
1
EricTorkelson's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:32 pm

Sorry Coldworld, Get your best five out if you only have three... Nijman cannot pass block ( Watch the Bears load his side ) Meyers is still struggling with the snap count for gods sake... Z Tom probably should start somewhere ... Im thinking the Bears will stack the line to stop the run early and blitz the hell out of J love on second/third and long... Not having a blocking tight end might really hurt. Lets pray Bach stays healthy...

0 points
1
1
EricTorkelson's picture

August 09, 2023 at 09:37 pm

LambeauPlain..... Yosh is one of the best run blocking OL in the NFL.. And what cool aid have you been drinking ???

0 points
1
1
CheeseEdWest2's picture

August 09, 2023 at 12:55 pm

Just not seeing it from Myers yet. We're hearing about errors in the snaps, but not any big positives that offset that. Glad they are keeping the competition open, and having Yosh at RT seems solid. What I'm wondering is if Rhyan will give Runyon a push for RG...

4 points
4
0
Minniman's picture

August 09, 2023 at 02:45 pm

Grab some popcorn and your favorite refreshment as football is finally back!

I'm just going to zone in on your comments re offense Al.

This will be a unique opportunity for Packers fans. With (essentially) the transplantation of the offensive brains trust and actors of the last 3 years to an opposing team we will actually get to see who is right.

Don't bother with the cryptic jaw-boning men, SHOW us what you've got!

Was MLF the repressed tactical genius?
Was Rodgers and Hackett's take on offense considerably different?
How do they respond when the defenses counter?

With Salah's limited Offensive experience, we are definitely going to see the pure, unadulterated Hackett\Rodgers offense, with the added bonus of a number of the main players to boot!

Agree or not, how the Jets go this year will ABSOLUTELY influence MLF's performance rating - and I think that we'll have key information in answering the (toxic) question of if "Rodgers' talent was wasted in GB".

As an aside, the Jets are building a SOLID D. If they make a run, it will be on the back of that D rather than exclusively Rodgers' arm,

1 points
1
0
Oppy's picture

August 09, 2023 at 06:31 pm

Al states: "Based on accounts from people who have been at the practices, it appears one thing that our former QB disliked greatly has been re-implemented as a core principle of this offense - pre-snap motion. This fits perfectly into the narrative (and one I fully subscribe to) that Matt LaFleur will be free to do things HIS way and give us his pure vision of what the offense should look like."

Here's more read-between-the-lines, circumstantial evidence, from this SI article about 'the moment' the Packers knew Jordan Love was ready to be the guy:

https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/08/07/why-the-packers-are-comfortable-with-j...

The money passage from the article:

"And while the Eagles were driving the field, it stuck with LaFleur that he had a call that’d perfectly exploit a loose quarters coverage Philly had been running. The problem? Where it ranked on Love’s list of calls was in, as LaFleur recalls it, Do Not Call This If I Go In territory. “But I kept seeing the look for it,” LaFleur says. So after Love started the next series with a 15-yard throw to Watson and a first-down incompletion, the coach spit into the headset, Hey, do you trust me? Can I call this?

Yeah, Love responded, Let’s let it eat."

It's this in a nutshell.

All it took was Love showing he was willing to work with his HC, and LaFleur was sold. That kind of insinuates maybe LaFleur wasn't getting much of a chance to apply his offense prior.

Here's to a successful 2023. I absolutely agree it will be the first time we get to see MLF's offense for any length of time. It will probably be the first time we see the entire offense on the same page as the head coach.

0 points
1
1
greengold's picture

August 09, 2023 at 07:01 pm

“Hello, Sweet Music! Allow me to introduce you to my ears…”

0 points
0
0
packerfanroy's picture

August 09, 2023 at 07:46 pm

It cracks me up that Packer fans are so excited that Joe Barry is working with his players to run a scheme that plays to their strengths instead of just doing whatever Barry says....And then turn around and say the MLF doing the same thing with Arod was a problem for the offense. How effective is the motion part of the playbook when the main (I know other players motion too) motion guy is Amari Rodgers??? If the defense doesnt respect the guy running the motion (probably praying that Amari is getting the ball lets be real) then doesnt that defeat the purpose of stressing the defense trying to cover the motion? Which makes the whole thing a waste of time when you dont have time to waste?

Yes, Barry tweaking his scheme to mesh with his players should be a good thing. Having the D consistently play up to expectations would be a nice change.

No, Arod wanting less motion and not running MLF's 'pure' scheme was not a bad thing. MLF (and now Barry, finally) tweaked their scheme to fit their players strengths.

Yes, JLove is gonna run a more pure MLF offense because MLF has more pro experience than JLove. As JLove gets more experience over the years you might see less motion than this first year as he learns NFL D's better.

Yes, JLove and MLF can have success using more motion. It keeps things simple for a young QB. Also, teams might get stressed more defending J.Reed in motion than say Amari "I have a gift for the defense" Rodgers

1 points
1
0
Oppy's picture

August 10, 2023 at 12:13 am

Rodgers' dislike of motion had nothing to do with Amari Rodgers.

Aaron Rodgers has repeatedly said over the years he doesn't like motion because he believes he can read defensive fronts better from a static set while winding down the clock... which is about as backwards as can be for LaFleur's offense which is supposed to incorporate a good deal of pre snap motion and also be out of the huddle and getting in and out of plays at an uptempo pace.

-1 points
0
1
packerfanroy's picture

August 10, 2023 at 04:19 am

Its true that Rodgers not liking motion doesnt have anything to do with Amari Rodgers.

I just wonder how much of the Packers not doing motion had to do with Arod not liking it vs Arod and/or MLF looking at Amari Rodgers and saying even if we wanted to use more motion we're not going to because we dont trust Amari.

Seems to me that Amari was in the same role like Swervin Earvin but they didnt even want to involve Amari because he didnt know the playbook and lost the ball alot.

Another way of looking at what I'm saying is to think about this hypothetical. In this hypothetical 1. ARod loves motion. 2. You still have Amari Rodgers. 3. A large part of the playcalls that use motion involved using Amari Rodgers as a weapon (getting the ball) or a threat (he could get the ball). Would Arod and MLF use as much motion knowing that Amari Rodgers was a big part of it?

I think that with Amari Rodgers being a such a huge liability in terms of ball control and knowing the playbook that lot of the motion in the offense got tossed out the window regardless of whether or not Arod or MLF wanted it.

Lack of tempo is one the reasons that Arod isnt fond of motion but you are right about the static sets. “When you have so much motion, it’s hard to get tempo going. You always have to make sure you’re set, and you have a motion, or a double motion, or a jet off of it,” Rodgers said.

Getting out of the huddle fast is what MLF wants because they need time to use motion but that doesnt mean the MLF offense is uptempo.

1 points
1
0
Oppy's picture

August 10, 2023 at 09:06 am

..Except for the fact that in previous years the coaching staff has told the press when asked that they don't want the clock winding down to 2, 1, 0 seconds before the snap.

Except for the fact that other teams use motion and still get snaps off with 10 seconds on the clock.

No hypothetical, the reason why the Packers didn't run more motion and the offense winds down the clock nearly every play is because Rodgers didn't want to run much motion because he wants to play his hand signals offense at the last second before the snap after he's determined what he thinks the defense is going to do... instead of running the damn offense as it's designed.

I'm done talking about Rodgers and excited to talk about the prospect of a Green Bay Packers TEAM that features an entire offense that's on the same page as the playcaller / head coach.. for the first time since perhaps 2016-17 season.

1 points
1
0
packerfanroy's picture

August 10, 2023 at 06:14 pm

The Amari Rodgers aspect was just something to think about, I honestly have no idea how true or how much impact it had.

Again, it just cracks me up that people are excited that Barry is finally working with his players and tweaking his scheme to fit their playstyle. While at the same time being pissed off at Rodgers "for not running the offense as it's designed".

Are you excited that Barry is tweaking his scheme and not just telling his players to run the defense as designed?? You shouldn't be based on your comments about Rodgers "running the offense as it's designed". I know I'm excited. If you are excited about Barry's change, then it sounds like your problems with how the offense was run has nothing to do with football.

If someone's bias against one player is so bad that it makes them contradict themself then it cheapens anything they have to say about the Offense both in the past and the present going forward because their thinking is based on feelings not fact or logic.

I'm not trying to attack people for hating Rodgers, but I come to this chat board to talk about the Packers and I'd prefer to do it using logic and not feelings.

0 points
0
0
phillythedane's picture

August 10, 2023 at 09:40 am

Y'know, Jersey Al is kind of the GOAT.

1 points
1
0