Believe the Maxwell Hairston Buzz

There's been a lot of smoke around Maxwell Hairston being Green Bay's pick in round one, but there are plenty of reasons to buy in.

During ‘lying season’, which is the few weeks before the NFL Draft, when teams and agents are pumping out a deluge of information through the media, a lot of which simply isn’t true, it can be difficult to know what to believe and what to ignore.

The buzz around the Packers drafting Kentucky cornerback Maxwell Hairston has grown in recent weeks, and while on the face of it, there are reasons to dismiss this. I’m here to tell you: buy it.

In case you missed the links, Daniel Jeremiah gave Hairston to Green Bay in his mock draft a few weeks ago. Mel Kiper mentioned him in his final mock, despite giving Mykel Williams to the Packers, saying they would also “take a look” at Hairston.

On the NFL Daily podcast, Nate Tice of Yahoo Sports said of the Packers: “I know they like Hairston”.

At first, I refused to believe the rumours based on the simple fact Hairston weighed 183 lbs at the combine. Green Bay has not drafted a corner that light since at least 2010.

The lightest they have drafted in that time is 184 lbs, when Brian Gutekunst selected Shemar Jean-Charles, who he admitted was a significant departure from their usual standards, and did not exactly pan out.

Not only was Hairston 183 lbs at the combine, he was 179 lbs at the Senior Bowl. There’s no way, right?

Well, Hairston posted a picture on his instagram story recently of him apparently weighing 193 lbs. 

Some prospects bulk up before the combine, weigh in but do not test, then drop the weight and do athletic testing at their pro days, but do not weigh in. They do this to get the best of both worlds on their official athletic profile.

Hairston’s post was after the combine and his pro day, so it is clearly not a case of him trying to artificially put on weight to have it on official record, then immediately drop it again.

So why else would he be putting on weight? Either because he intends to play in the 190s, or wants to show NFL teams he can.

If the weight issue is in fact a non-issue, everything else about Hairston makes him a picture perfect Packers first round pick, starting with his athletic testing.

Hairston was the fastest prospect at the combine, running a 4.28 in the 40-yard dash, which earned him an ‘elite’ speed score using the Relative Athletic Score (RAS) model. That is extremely important, and here’s why:

Eight of the nine first-round picks taken by Brian Gutekunst, and every non-quarterback, has had an elite speed score. Not good speed, not great speed, elite speed.

The only players ranked between 11 and 50 on the consensus big board, which is where the Packers are likely to be getting their first-round pick from, with elite speed:

  • Shemar Stewart
  • Jihaad Campbell
  • Matthew Golden
  • Nick Emmanwori
  • James Pearce
  • Josh Conerly
  • Maxwell Hairston

Campbell, Emmanwori and Conerly are unlikely picks due to a lack of need at the position, while Pearce reportedly has character/work ethic concerns.

That leaves Stewart, Golden and Hairston.

Stewart and Golden have both been to Green Bay on visits, while Hairston has not yet. Gutekunst has said in the past though that if he does not have any questions that need answering, he will generally leave a player alone so as not to arouse suspicion.

If the Packers did take Stewart, he would be by far the least productive pass rusher Gutekunst has drafted in terms of pressures per season as a college starter. Even the traits-focused Packers have production standards to a point.

The only testing Golden did was the 40, which was of course excellent, but Gutekunst has not drafted someone with as little athletic testing as him in the first round during his tenure.

Golden also has a ‘poor’ RAS size grade, which is something they have never taken as an outside receiver, and they do not need a slot receiver. Even though Hairston is light, he is over 5’11, so has an ‘okay’ RAS size grade overall, and that’s before he apparently put on weight.

Hairston also did the vert and broad jumps, excelling in both and receiving an ‘elite’ RAS explosion score. He does not turn 22 until June.

Hairston’s top two athletic comparisons according to RAS are Denzel Ward, who was the fourth overall pick in his class, and former Packer Sam Shields. 

Just from an overall draft principle standpoint, we are talking about a young, elite and explosive athlete from the SEC. That is where the Packers live in the first round.

Drafting Hairston would also fulfill another of their principles: the double down.

Under Gutekunst, whenever the Packers have a roster need, they have hit it with both barrels in terms of free agency and early in the draft. In 2019 it was Za’Darius Smith, Preston Smith and Adrian Amos in free agency, then Rashan Gary and Darnell Savage in the draft.

Last year they signed Josh Jacobs and Xavier McKinney, then drafted Marshawn Lloyd and Javon Bullard in the first three rounds. They just signed Nate Hobbs in free agency, so it is likely they are going to take a corner in the first three rounds of the draft.

Assuming they do want to draft a corner, they are going to have to be flexible on something. There is no perfect prospect for them in what is a weird cornerback class, where lots of the top players were unable to, or did not test.

  • Will Johnson did not test, has short arms, and is probably not making it to pick 23.
  • Jahdae Barron has really short arms and is turning 24 years old this year.
  • Shavon Revel did not test and just turned 24.
  • Trey Amos has ‘great’, but not ‘elite’ speed, only had ‘okay’ explosion testing and is 23.
  • Azareye’h Thomas only had ‘okay’ speed and had incomplete testing.
  • Benjamin Morrison did not test and has short arms
  • Darien Porter is 24.
  • Jacob Parrish is 5’9 ⅔”

That is all the corners currently projected to go in the top 100 of this draft, according to the consensus big board.

If they do not break precedent on something for a cornerback this year, they are not going to take one. Hairston can (and maybe already has) put on weight, whereas the other guys listed cannot ‘fix’ their respective disqualifying factors. Hairston is the corner for them in this class.

In terms of Hairston as a football player, he is a competitive, energetic corner who has a lot of the characteristics Green Bay will like. He has played almost exclusively on the perimeter, but due to his physical dimensions, should also have the versatility to play in the slot if needed.

At Kentucky, he played in a defense which had a balanced mix of man and zone coverage. On the zone side of things, he performed well in cover-3 looks. Man to man and cover-3 is the type of defense Jeff Hafley wants to play in Green Bay.

His run defense and tackling is up and down, but the effort is always there, and with more bulk on his body, he could be more consistent in that regard.

Ball production is something the Packers covet in their defensive backs, and Hairston had five interceptions in 2023, including two pick-sixes in one game. He had six interceptions in two seasons, compared to only three touchdowns allowed.

In 2023 his PFF coverage grade of 85.3 was better than Mike Sainristil, Terrion Arnold, Nate Wiggins, Ennis Rakestraw and Cooper DeJean, who all went in the first two rounds of last year’s draft.

His play was not as strong in 2024, as he missed time with injury, and also played in a Kentucky defense which drastically fell off from the previous year.

Green Bay is going to think they are getting an absolute steal if they are able to select Hairston. If he had followed up his 2023 performance in 2024, he would likely be long gone before the Packers pick at 23.

If Hairston is on the board when the Packers are on the clock in the first round, expect them to sprint the card up.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (34)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
PackEyedOptimist's picture

April 14, 2025 at 06:35 am

Early on, I was high on Hairston as our second-round pick, then I saw reports that he was accused of sexual assault (as a freshman) by a girl on Tik-Tok, and that she said there were "others" who had similar incidents. So I dropped him.

HOWEVER, since then there have been multiple reports that those accusations were faked.
The issue seems to have pretty much disappeared in draft reports online, so I'm tending to believe that the accusations were faked. I trust the Packers will have completely researched the question. If Hairston is cleared, he's one of my top choices for the Packers, as he's the missing component to the CB room: a super-fast outside CB.

0 points
0
0
markoldacres's picture

April 14, 2025 at 03:11 pm

Do you have any links to reports that the accusations were faked? It's a strange situation as there is nothing about the accusations in any news or media report anywhere on the internet, just the accusers instagram posts and some tweets about it. Trying to get to the bottom of it.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

April 14, 2025 at 06:56 am

Just in. Lombardi ave draft mock shows Packers trading down with Cleveland Browns. Shows Packers getting Egbuka WR first. CB Trey Amos in second round along with Jordon Burch DL/edge. That would nicely address all three major needs in my opinion. I am now in the trade down camp!

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 14, 2025 at 07:20 am

You know what’s kinda strange? The words used to describe trading around in the draft. To trade UP means to go from like 23 to 13, whereas to trade DOWN means to go from like 23 to 33. To trade BACK can also mean that. But I swear I’ve heard that trading DOWN can also mean to go from 23 to 13. It can be a little confusing.
Guess that’s the ONE thing keeping me from becoming a GM.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 14, 2025 at 09:43 am

I've never heard moving UP as moving DOWN. Have you been in Stocky's frog collection? Don't lick the orange ones!😵‍💫

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 14, 2025 at 09:41 am

Where's the DT?

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

April 14, 2025 at 10:53 am

See the Lombardi Ave draft mock! It has the Packers trading down and then up to get three highly rated players in or close to the second. In return they give up their number one and a number four for essentially two second rounders and a high third. Teams involved would be Cleveland and Jacksonville.
Gute could do this. So, don't panic if you see him strike a trade in the first round to move down 10 spots.
We can still get a great player at the top of round two. That is in fact how we got Christian Watson. The needs are DL, WR, and CB. In any damn order.
. In Gute we trust.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 14, 2025 at 03:00 pm

If they're going to trade down that far might as well pickup some picks for next year to replace the FAs they are going to lose.
42.
Kenneth Grant
DT Michigan
54.
Jalen Royals
WR Utah State
81.
Omarr Norman-Lott
DT Tennessee
103.
Jordan Hancock
CB Ohio State
135.
Ajani Cornelius
OT Oregon
141.
Danny Stutsman
LB Oklahoma
179.
Marcus Tate
OG Clemson
207.
Elijhah Badger
WR Florida
231.
Jackson Hawes
TE Georgia Tech
254.
Barryn Sorrell
EDGE Texas
255.
Elijah Ponder
EDGE Cal Poly

2026 NYJ 2nd
2026 CLE 4th
2026 CIN 5th
2026 JAX 7th
2026 MIN 7th

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

April 14, 2025 at 07:08 am

The Packers/Gute have had a tendency to draft someone young with one good season followed by a down season, usually explained as or due to extenuating circumstances.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 14, 2025 at 03:03 pm

Jalen Royals and Deone Walker in rounds 2 and 3 would fit that bill.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 14, 2025 at 07:20 am

If they “sprint the card up”, would that be elite speed?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 14, 2025 at 09:11 am

If it were me doing the sprinting, they might struggle to get the pick in on time.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 14, 2025 at 10:50 am

LOL

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

April 14, 2025 at 01:42 pm

You must have worked for the Vikings a couple times during the draft? ;)

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 14, 2025 at 09:03 am

I like Hairston but he’s small/light (bottom 15% for corners) and he’s not a good tackler. So despite his athleticism, I don’t see him in the slot under Hafley and I think he may have issues with bigger, more physical receivers outside. That said, his athletic profile does fit what Hafley seems to want in terms of agility and explosion.

He does have good zone skills. He’s a more obvious fit than Amos (terrible 3 cone and vertical) who just visited. In the second perhaps, but not at 23 for me. The weight issue on his frame may even mean he’s off the Packers board though unless the Packers believe he can maintain athleticism at the weight increase claimed. I’m suspicious, because he was back down to 183 at testing.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 14, 2025 at 09:28 am

One of the drawbacks of having so many young players at or near the top of the depth chart at so many positions is that there's significant roster churn coming: you just can't sign everyone. I would argue it also means that there are very few positions that are truly "out of play" in round 1 because an opportunity pick--a player with a high grade who unexpectedly shows up at 23 who can re-set your depth chart on a rookie deal--can lead to a significant realignment of priorities in extensions, and even push some of these guys approaching the end of their deals into trade bait. I think there are a huge number of ways the Packers can go in round 1.

From my limited view, I can see a couple scenarios where the Packers go CB in round 1. The fact that they haven't resolved the JA situation yet is also a little complicating in figuring how the Packers roll in this draft. The longer he hangs around, the more likely he hangs around, and the more likely the Packers go with a later, traitsy, CB or two to develop. The fact that they have S who can walk up and cover the slot takes pressure off the CB position depth in general. A high-end shutdown CB is a valuable commodity, but if you're going to play a lot of zone, do you invest in that guy? I'm not a fan of Hairston, though, mostly because he's awfully frail, and you need zone CB to tackle.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 14, 2025 at 10:20 am

I'd be happy with them waiting and grabbing two CBs later. Jordan Hancock and Nohl Williams would be my ideal pair. Hancock has played everywhere but has the athleticism to play outside and Williams is a ball hawk.

0 points
0
0
MooPack's picture

April 14, 2025 at 10:23 am

Yep, those are the two I have as well.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 14, 2025 at 10:55 am

I would not touch Nohl Williams because of his stiffness. His agility is just not there, horizontally or vertically and he could not beat 4.50 at his pro day. He’s very similar to Kemal Hadden, a 6th rounder with good ball skills selected last year by the Chiefs who ended up on our PS and 90. Slightly faster than Hadden but with appreciably less burst.

While one could say that it’s worked for Nixon, he’s notably faster and I’m not sure a slot is our need or that type is the way to go outside. Nixon is a good tackler. Williams is not. An absolute no for me.

That said, I do agree with you in principle in terms of the sweet spot for corners in this draft and in liking Hancock. I’d simply substitute a player like Jason Marshall or even Noah Daniels of TCU in the 7th or Jalen Kimber of Penn State as a UDFA.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 14, 2025 at 03:06 pm

Williams' agilities weren't Trey Amos terrible. The Florida CB would be a good late round pick as well.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 14, 2025 at 05:08 pm

No, they weren’t Amos bad. He is kind of like Hadden though, who we already have. A lot of people liked Hadden too and had him going well before he did, but not in the early rounds. Lack of speed and agility are a bad combination in a corner. Amos is faster (4.43) but he is so stiff i am not sure that helps vastly in the NFL.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 14, 2025 at 10:40 am

The Hobbs signing probably means Valentine is going to the bench. That's fine, it's good to have a #3 outside CB of his caliber. If they draft a CB in the first round, that means either Nixon or Bullard will go to the bench--probably Bullard because Nixon and Hobbs both have more experience in the slot and can play there. It doesn't make sense to me that they would draft a player who puts last year's second round draft pick on the bench. We need depth at CB, not another starter.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 14, 2025 at 11:04 am

Hobbs is a player I can see moving around situationally. I think not only Interchanging with Bullard in the slot, but possibly with Nixon too if Hobbs works out on the perimeter, depending on game situation and opponent. Valentine is a perimeter guy. His big weakness is physicality. If he can up that then he’s a more credible competitor outside. I think he’s a better vertical corner than Nixon and thus for deep ball offenses. Hafley has pieces he can move around situationally or tactically.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

April 14, 2025 at 12:32 pm

Yep, plenty of pieces already. Do they need to add another one to the mix?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 14, 2025 at 05:23 pm

I suppose it depends on Alexander. If he’s here, then not really for this year, but a later upside pick to develop would be wise. Without Alexander it gets a bit thin and we probably do need more outside depth for this year. Nixon, Hobbs, Valentine are the only known commodities.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

April 14, 2025 at 01:48 pm

Yes - I agree with you mark.
Because Gute doesn't know what the hell he's doing,
when it comes to the NFL draft.

Oh he can take another CB
because it fits his draft board.

And he can ship Alexander off
to help him buy what he needs.

The guy is just a piece of work.
Let's just face facts.
The visions he had for the secondary.
Have been nothing but a Nightmare.

It's time for a player who had production.
Who changes a game with every tackle,
every rush, every turn-over. Etc.

Selecting CB after CB after CB.
Isn't a priority.
It's mental illness. Comparison to -A loser in Vegas.
Hairston is just another figment of the imagination.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

April 14, 2025 at 03:12 pm

Oh Boy, Stocky is bitched up today. Must have run out of frogs. Try the purple ones Stocky, I hear the hallucinations aren't as violent as the orange ones!

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 14, 2025 at 04:44 pm

This guy would be a Gute-like pick. They already have Valentine.

0 points
0
0
stormin's picture

April 14, 2025 at 07:32 pm

You are exactly right, this Guteless idiot has ruined this organization, hopefully this will prove to be his last with Green Bay !

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

April 14, 2025 at 05:03 pm

Could do worst than Hairston...speed is impressive but it does not guarantee a prolific NFL career. Ask M. Hardman.

I still would go DL in the first round...and if a trade down, then with their first pick. So many top prospects with a resumes you don't have to fill in with projections.

I do see the value of drafting CB..and the Pack will probably draft 2...given Alexander the Occasional's need for money whether he plays actual football games or not.

But draft CBs that do not have such wide boon/bust attributes. Hairston for Hafley's improved defense would likely provide less ROI than would one of the top DL guys.

Draft a CB that may not have the sizzle, but plenty of steak: lots of on field production, availability, football leadership. Not a top shelf CB draft...but plenty of good CB prospects for Hafley, Ainsley and Downard to coach up.

0 points
0
0
nagawicka's picture

April 14, 2025 at 08:14 pm

Terrell Buckley. Do not believe the Hairston smoke.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

April 14, 2025 at 08:19 pm

Hopefully, Hafley will have a voice-wasn't he a DB coach at one time?

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

April 15, 2025 at 11:26 am

It is lying season. Just because Mel Kiper and other reporters think this will happen doesn't make them reliable sources. Their 'sources' often blow smoke at them knowing they will repeat it and throw everyone off who they are really targeting.
One thing to remember: you can anticipate how the first round will go but it rarely goes as planned. There's always a team or two who will throw a monkey wrench into the works. The Packers brass has no idea if the player they want will be there at pick 23. On their boards they probably have half-a-dozen players they could select.
Hairston is an option and likely will be there. But as of today, Jaire is still on the team. If they don't trade or cut him by draft day, he might stick making a first round corner less desirable than their real first round need: a man mountain in the middle of the defensive line. In round 2 they can find a receiver with speed.

Moral of the story: look with jaundiced eye at anything being said prior to the draft.

0 points
0
0
Lime Caipirinha's picture

April 15, 2025 at 03:20 pm

Hairston is a nice prospect; film earns respect for his strong coverage thanks to his great feet and athleticism. But Jahdae Barron is that dude. He is the cream of the crop.... Whichever team drafts him I will ENVY

0 points
0
0