Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - Beware the Ides of March

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

Silence of the Lamb - I've seen many people commending Jordan Love for how professionally he has handled this whole Aaron Rodgers Saga, staying virtually silent while the offseason plays out. Not to be skeptical (alright, just a little) it does make me wonder if the Packers told him after the season ended that this was his team next year - that one way or another, Rodgers would not be back. So Love has remained silent as a lamb, but rather than being led to slaughter, he will be leading the Packers.

Silence of the Lion - How ironic is it that the man who has had so much to say about his and the Packers' situation, whether in press conferences or shooting the shit on the McAfee show, has gone dead silent the last week as the NFL World burns around him. He's the Lion King, sitting majestically up on a bluff, silently surveying all the wild-eyed hyenas chasing their prey. But as I'm writing this (Tuesday evening), news just broke that  Rodgers will be on the Pat McAfee show today (Wednesday) at 1PM EST. Oh the drama, oh the buildup, oh the anticipation... This could very well break Youtube. I hope they activated all emergency power and put their backup servers into production mode.

Beware the Ides of March - Rodgers goes on McAfee on the Ides of March! Will Aaron Rodgers verbally "assassinate" the Packers triumvirate of Murphy/Gutey/LaFleur for giving up on him? Or as it was in Ancient Rome, is it merely the day the trio's plan to remove the almighty ruler from overbearing power is executed? I guess this will be the first time I make a point of watching the McAfee show. Which means that Rodgers will reveal nothing yet about his decision. Book it. 

Keisean Nixon - As I wrote here, he was my (any many other people's) priority free agent for the Packers to bring back. I find myself surprised that it's a one-year deal. Not from the Packers' standpoint, it's great for them. It's a low base salary (1.3M) with a variety of bonuses (including a signing bonus) and incentives for a max value of $6M. I'm just surprised this was the best Nixon could do. Maybe I just misjudged his value to other teams. Or perhaps he had a better offer but just had a strong desire to say with his old coach, Rich Bisaccia. Whatever the reason, I'm delighted!

 

 

Clements/Love - Is it coincidence or cause and effect that Jordan Love's development supposedly took such a huge jump this year when he was able to work with the guy who put Aaron Rodgers on his HOF path many years ago? 

My Sources Say - That this whole "sources" thing has gotten way out of hand. It really feels like the NFL encourages it, if not actually enables it somehow. Do they make deals with people in the organization in the know? Do they encourage ESPN and other outlets to do the same? Can you imagine Ted Thompson operating in this environment? I can't.

And don't forget: The CHTV Draft Guide will be available on the CHTV Store on April 3rd and you will be able to download it right from there,

 

 

 

 

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

NFL Categories: 
11 points
 

Comments (213)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Koostyroosty's picture

March 15, 2023 at 06:14 am

It is no coincidence that Love has progressed under Tom Clements. One of the most underrated QB coaches we've ever had.

15 points
16
1
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:27 am

I hope you're right. Has Clements developed any other QB's other than Rodgers? Not sure Kyler Murray developed into greatness, and he only was with Favre for one year, which was later in his career. It might just be Rodgers was that good and he would've developed either way. Time will tell on Love. He has the tools; now does he have the mental game?

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:55 am

Actually, all reports from the days Packers were drafted ACR was pretty negative on his mechanics as the first and foremost miscue he had to change. Second was his field scanning that was almost non existent. The third objection was non consistent accuracy of his throws. All were agreed that he has huge talent, cannon instead of arm, that he is very intelligent, but "cocky". They all agreed that he needs few years of development to become legit NFL starter.

How I know that? It was published on Packers.com when one fan stated, in Vic chat "Ask Vic" how Aaron Rodgers was ready from the very begging he was drafted and Vic posted several links what scouts said about ACR before draft. Vic pointed out that 2 things was the reason why teams let him fall down the 1st round - first was "not readiness" to play immediately and, by Vic opinion, his cockiness (read arrogance)!

And , later in his career he had several statement how Mike McCarthy and his Summer QB school and work of Tom Clements with him helped him to reach the level he was at the time he said those statements.

That is what I can say about how good he was at the beginning...

2 points
4
2
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:04 am

Croat, I certainly was in tune to those reports. Those are the reasons he dropped in the draft. I don't doubt Clements had something to do with it, certainly with the mechanics, but one QB doesn't make a QB whisper.

I also think Rodgers would've been great either way. One thing a Coach cannot fix all that much is the mental part of the game. QB's have to read defenses and react quickly, know when trouble is coming, etc... can a coach help in that, sure, but mainly it is up to the QB to handle. Each QB must develop that instinct with their own brain. When it comes down to it, many QB's have similar physical abilities, it's the mental part that separate the great ones. There wasn't anything special about Brady physically and that is why he was a 7th rounder. It was the mental part that made him so great.

That said, I'm hoping he does great things for Love.

4 points
5
1
Bitternotsour's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:28 am

agreed. also, you can't overlook McCarthy's developing Rodgers footwork and reworking his throwing motion. They had to break him to make him.

That said, the guy has a golden arm. You can't coach that, it isn't in everyone's toolkit. Aaron is also smarter than an average footballer. That helped too.

4 points
5
1
Johnblood27's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:41 am

so, a great arm and intelligence...

It took a LOT of coaching to make AR what he WAS.

Please don't tell me he would have had the same trajectory without all of the help he got from coaches in GB.

2 points
3
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:33 am

Tell me that Jordan Love does not have that golden arm.

Remember short video from 2022 TC. Packers.com show 4 tries from 40 yard to net. 2 ACR was misses, 2 JL was on spot.

Go, watch Jordan Love highlights from college. Let yourself see those long throws to the exact spot reachable only for his receiver while receiver literally had corner all over himself. It was throw longer than 40 yards.

-1 points
2
3
jlc1's picture

March 15, 2023 at 01:24 pm

Rodgers' golden arm was his accuracy, I think that is widely understood. Love on the other hand led major college football in interceptions his last year. So he is like a guy who can run fast but not catch the ball. Great video bad game day results. So it looks like coaching is going to make his arm golden not him. If he develops anything close to Rodgers' accuracy the Pack will have a keeper.

0 points
1
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 01:41 pm

So, that pass to Aaron Jones vs Philly on the side is miss throw from Jordan, not drop from AJ.

If you want to talk about those 17 INT, first you need to look those games. 70% of those INT came from bad receivers not catch. Only, let say about 5 to 6 INT was Jordan Love wrong decisions. It was not accuracy in question. It was bad decisions and mostly 11 to 12 bad non catch passes on spot.

As I stated already several times, I really put some work to see how he played in college. And look at lot of analyses of his play from experts. So, just giving numbers means nothing if you do not know the circumstances.

But, that is your right.

0 points
1
1
barutanseijin's picture

March 15, 2023 at 03:31 pm

I’m not sure when Clements came to GB, but Favre had a couple good seasons at the very end of his career. He had looked completely finished in 2005.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:09 am

This article tells us...that Jordan Love made a huge step this last season.
Excuse me, but what is this based off of?
His 6 completions against the vikings in the 4th quarter down by 14 playing 3 min. 13 seconds?
Other than that, what did he do?
I'm just sayin lol, praise Clemonts for that, crown Jordan Love. Tell yourself Love is the next coming, enjoy yourself.
I prefer to see it happen in front of my eyes, i'm strange that way.
I know...i know...MLF and Gute say he looks so much more comfortable in practice and running practice when Rodgers needs the rest.
BUT.....since when is that the judgement on a player? In a no contact practice?
Yea, i prefer to see him in real games, against a real pass rush.
Not a practice where Love knows what the defense is doing and knows he can't get hit.
****************
Everyone knows i'm a Rodgers fan, but that doesn't recuse him from criticism.
So i ask myself....why does Rodgers want Lewis and Cobb to come with him?
Is it to win? I could respect that then.
But if you have a team full of Cobb's and Lewis, you're not winning anything.

Or is he bringing them only because he's comfortable, transitioning with them to a new team, and because he's friends with them.

If it was to win....fine.
But lets be real, it's for his own satisfaction. But Woody Johnson doesn't have the backbone to say no.
It's the Jets, being the Jets.

I think it was a bush league move on Rodgers part, and the optics are horrible.

Lazard is somewhat legit, especially after the Packers emptied out the receiver room and Rodgers had to rely on rookie receivers to be productive.
Not exactly the sign of a draft and develop team.

I've said this the last handful of years...if you have to rely on a rookie draft class to be productive, you may have already lost.

-8 points
2
10
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:50 am

We did last year. That’s the point. The window closed and that what cap does, slowly throttles. This situation became untenable and now it looks like we have accepted that and will take our medicine, unpleasant as it may be till we recover enough to build around whomever. By which point Rodgers may no longer be playing anyway and would almost certainly not have been if he remained. We had our cake, ate it, and kept trying eat it again.

3 points
3
0
Since'75's picture

March 16, 2023 at 10:13 am

By "taking our medicine".

Are you referring to mismanagement?
Giving a player 101 million fully guaranteed, then 12 months later wish you hadn't done that?

Paying the Piper of pushing cash down the road every year?

Seeing the results of a shaky front line, an empty receiver room, and a injured franchise QB?

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:07 pm

I can see why Rodgers wants Lazard and Cobb. They will know his tendencies right from the get-go as the other Jets WRs learn how Aaron plays. More than half of Cobb's catches last year went for a first down. He is still a reliable 3rd down option for Rodgers. He's savvy enough to know how to get open when they need a few yards. Same with Lazard; both of those guys are reliable when the play breaks down and for called plays. They'll be in the right spot at the right time.

Lewis, I'm not so sure. I know Rodgers sees Lewis as a guy who brings tremendous leadership to the locker room. I don't know if the Jets are in need of that, but I think, along with his blocking and intermittent receptions, he brings that.

I would use the term "reliance" before I'd use the term "comfortable." He's comfortable with those guys because he know he can rely on them.

1 points
1
0
Since'75's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:43 pm

Rodgers was Cobb's best man, Rodgers just loves having Lewis around.

I agree WCPB, good post....
I wrote elsewhere that it makes the transition for Rodgers to a new team much easier with familiar faces.

It can't be easy at 39 to go to the Jets and start over. Thats one of the reasons i didn't think he'd be open to a trade.

Cobb's greatest value besides being a buddy is giving Rodgers a RELIABLE target on 3rd down every once in awhile to move the chains. Otherwise they are just very good friends and Rodgers is taking care of him.

For football, Lazard makes sense, and hopefully they can scheme him for a bigger role and more production.

Lewis i care nothing about, imo...the Packers have been damn fools to pay him what they have. He probably should have been gone 3 years ago or so, but Rodgers has kept him on i believe.

Lol...lets see if this trade gets (finished) worked out and the Jets approach these guys. Which they may, or may not.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

March 15, 2023 at 02:51 pm

Weren't you the guy that said Rodgers wasn't going anywhere? Like about a week or so ago?

4 points
4
0
Since'75's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:29 pm

I'll own it LH.

But i didn't say he wasn't.

I said, it was my opinion he wasn't, it was a guess. It wasn't a statement of fact.
I went by what Gute said 6 weeks ago in his glowing words about Rodgers giving the Packers the best chance to win.
I was wrong. I'll always own it.

I was wrong, just like i was the last time i was wrong, back in 2014.

Smile, it was a joke. You guys seem so serious in here.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

March 18, 2023 at 01:28 pm

10 thumbs down!!

YEA BABY!! 😊

Living in reality isn't it all its cracked up to be ...i guess.
Maybe i need to chug some lemon lime kool aid with gold sprinkles 😉

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

March 15, 2023 at 06:24 am

Lamb... Personally I've liked and appreciated the way Jordon Love has handled EVERYTHING since the day he was drafted. Love's a smart kid. He's just been quiet, biding his time, just waiting his turn. I'm stoked for Jordon Love and IMO he'll be better than Rodgers was last season (statistically) in year one as a starter.

Silence... I was listening to the NFL Network on XM Radio yesterday on my way home from work. Pat Kirwan made an interesting point, one that I agreed with 100% and a point that SHOWS Rodgers true colors. Why would Rodgers go on McAfee to announce he's going to the Jets, INSTEAD of doing it AT the Jets offices?

WHY? Because he's a truly selfish, arrogant POS. This list of demands? This issue with "Control"? EVERY other team is pursuing FA's. The Jets and Packers? Not so much. Unless you're on Rodgers "List". What a selfish fuck! IF he really is going to be a Jet, I'll be SO HAPPY! I'm so tired of Aaron Charles Rodgers. And Al, if he doesn't announce he's gone I think I'll stroke out. Please just GO AWAY 12!

Nixon...Thank you Keisean! I'm so happy you're going to be a Packers. Keep it up and do it for 17 plus games in 2023!

Clements... I think this is HUGE. I've always liked Clements as a QB coach. As a OC, not so much but as a QB coach one of the better ones in the business IMO. He helped Favre get back on track his last 2 seasons in GB and was huge in the development of Rodgers. OMG, remember the way Rodgers used to hold the ball coming out of Cal? By his earhole in his helmet? I think this was a huge factor in Love looking so much better and I think many of the Jordon Love sceptics will change their tune on him...Quickly!

16 points
27
11
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:23 am

Nick, many experts noticed Jordan Love talent. He had only one miscue. He was not ready NFL QB. But many of them were delighted about his traits and talent.

I watched a lot of evaluations on internet. Those which I believe the most did all what he made good as well as what he made wrong. But all of them were amazed on his throws precision and timing, as well as fast release.

I have no doubt he will excell. He has a chance with Packers to be 3rd in row HOFer. I trust he can do it with Tom Clements. When Packers announced that Tom Clements is coming back, many here thought it is move to help ACR. As I knew that nobody can help ACR in present "because he knows everything the best", I knew that was move to polish Jordan Love QB traits.

And that was on show for all at Eagles, 4th Q.

You are not alone in belief and supportfor Jordan Love.

10 points
13
3
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:14 pm

I'd slow the roll a little here, on proclaiming there is no doubt he will excel.The biggest thing young QBs with talent struggle with is consistency. Plenty of first rounders with talent fail in the NFL for lack of consistency despite having a strong arm and looking like a franchise QB at times. Only time will tell if Love will be consistent in developing once defenses get to know him and his tendencies and start to game-plan for him. So far he's had zero teams game-plan a defense to stop him.

2 points
2
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 01:45 pm

Fair point. But still there are experts opinion and we witness how Jordan Love learns fast. That is the most important trait.

0 points
0
0
Rebecca's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:06 am

It’ll get better. Excellent use of ALL CAPS. SOURCES SAY YOU DONT LIKE MY HERO AARON CHARLES RODGERS THE GREAT

-7 points
2
9
Johnblood27's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:44 am

I am still waiting for my sandwich and coffee... just sayin...

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:11 am

"EVERY other team is pursuing FA's. The Jets and Packers? Not so much."

Both teams were cap poor leading into March, and both are needing to clear cap due to the fallout of this trade--assuming it happens. I'm wondering if their GM is hearing alarm bells as he's jumping through hoops at the direction of Woody's whims: Packers have been there. It also appears the limited cap the Jets have is spoken for...

" Why would Rodgers go on McAfee to announce he's going to the Jets, INSTEAD of doing it AT the Jets offices?"

We don't know where he'll be when he logs in to McTankTop, but he'll need to be in NY soon to put a pretty spin on the whole thing. The podcast is his turf, and he controls the narrative there. He's not going to be asked anything hard or controversial like he might be asked by reporters at a presser. He'll be able to talk about whatever he wants to...but I don't think he takes his shots at the Packers, yet.

"Clements... I think this is HUGE."

The volume of work Love has gotten since the end of the 2020 season has increased dramatically. The Packers mostly threw away Love's 2020 season by choice: could've installed him as the #2 to increase his practice reps and kept him active on game days, but chose to minimize his development. That's a head-scratcher, especially given the productivity of other QBs in that draft who had no preseason but jumped pretty much straight into starters' roles. I'm not going to say that Love will be a great QB. I'm hoping for a quality player who makes good decisions and runs the offense. Anything more will be gravy.

"Lamb"

Love doesn't have anything, yet. There's nothing he could really add: he's the the top of the depth chart absent 12, but the Packers are going to have to find a backup QB with some experience and there's no guarantee that Love will outplay that guy. If I'm a QB with some starting experience who's on the open market and looking at places where I could get a chance to start, I'd be looking very closely at GB and perhaps take less money on that risk.

-2 points
3
5
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:36 am

LaFleur stating that Love threw more passes in mini camp of 21 than he had all 2020 was a stunning comment. It’s up there with not having a game plan for Love by November 2021 in a Covid year as well. Also with the realization that Bissacia had to demand some contact periods for ST, there never having been any previously.

8 points
9
1
jannes bjornson's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:55 am

They were all given extensions.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:48 am

Just Say No to Carson Wince. Gardner Minshaw is a guy I liked out of college. Love can throw the deep out and long ball, just give him a competent O line. Do not set him up to be a Target, just to save a couple shekels.
Love was compared to Herbert, yet he didn't get reps in his Greenhorn year?

2 points
3
1
dobber's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:47 pm

If the Packers had dealt 12 last offseason, I was hoping the Packers would've pursued Minshew in trade to compete with Love for the job.

"Love was compared to Herbert, yet he didn't get reps in his Greenhorn year?"

Yeah. Not a good look...for the coaches, especially.

1 points
3
2
jannes bjornson's picture

March 15, 2023 at 02:24 pm

I may present an acerbic pt of view sometimes, but my instincts told me this guy was in over his head. The Shanahan tree is a shrub.

2 points
3
1
NickPerry's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:13 am

"Love doesn't have anything, yet. There's nothing he could really add: he's the the top of the depth chart absent 12, but the Packers are going to have to find a backup QB with some experience and there's no guarantee that Love will outplay that guy. If I'm a QB with some starting experience who's on the open market and looking at places where I could get a chance to start, I'd be looking very closely at GB and perhaps take less money on that risk."

Somehow I think Love is the starter no matter who they bring in... I heard rumblings about Matt Ryan. I'd bet Love would start before Ryan would and I'd hope he would.

4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:51 pm

"Somehow I think Love is the starter no matter who they bring in"

I think he starts the season, and it will be hard for someone to unseat him in preseason because I don't think Love will play many preseason snaps. Still, I want him to win the job.

I think Matt Ryan is washed.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 15, 2023 at 02:28 pm

Ryan as a rumor, or Nightmare? He has zero mobility and has cowered in the pocket. He would be an expensive backup to Jordan Love. Case Keenum already went to Buffalo.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 05:01 pm

If we run with Etling I would not mind. This is a growth year.
For players and a recovery year for cap. If Love gets hurt we don’t gain a lot by having a vet start in my view. If anything, I’d get a QB to develop for the future to push Love or trade for draft capital like we used to.

2 points
2
0
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:30 am

" Why would Rodgers go on McAfee to announce he's going to the Jets, INSTEAD of doing it AT the Jets offices?"

How do you even know what he is going to say today? Maybe, he's going to say he plans on playing and leaves it as that. Maybe the deal isn't even done between Jets and the Packers yet. It wouldn't surprise me.

5 points
8
3
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:50 am

From everything I have heard it isn't a hold up with Rodgers. Its a hold up in compensation with the Packers. Packers want multiple 1st round picks and Jets don't want to give that up.

But no, lets just blame Rodgers because you know he is a selfish fuck.

Lets not let the truth change that narrative though.

-4 points
4
8
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:05 am

You are quoting Trey Wingo! Fact or fiction?

3 points
3
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:24 am

I am pretty sure I saw that from Schefter. Could have been Wingo. I know I saw it but can't remember from where. There has been so much coverage over this its hard to keep it all together.

-1 points
1
2
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:01 am

Wingo!

1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:49 am

Ok, I really can't remember lol.

But Wingo has been correct the last 2 years. So I will go with that he is locked into the situation.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:34 pm

Seems like Rodgers has said

(1) he wants to play for the Jets, that decision has been made, and
(2) that the Packers are unhappy with the proposed compensation, and
(3) He did not say he’d retire If he couldn’t play for the Jets.

It’s elsewhere further “reported” that the compensation sought is not as high as some have been saying (multiple first rounders) but that the Jets are still resisting meeting those demands.

Overall, per Rodgers, the delay is now on the Packers not him and the compensation is the sticking point despite being less than some (I thought outlandish) claims. Back to you Mr Murphy: Ball to serve I believe.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 15, 2023 at 02:34 pm

Lay siege. Make them wait.

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:10 am

Yes, and this could get really interesting or ugly depending on your perspective. Who's to say that the Packer don't hold tight to what they want. You would think the deal is done based on the happenings, but who knows.

Of course, everything is assumptions at this point.

2 points
3
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:44 am

Everything is assumptions and there is a lot being put out to the media from both teams.

0 points
1
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:49 am

"WHY? Because he's a truly selfish, arrogant POS. "
"What a selfish fuck! "
"I'll be SO HAPPY! I'm so tired of Aaron Charles Rodgers."
"if he doesn't announce he's gone I think I'll stroke out. Please just GO AWAY 12!"

Tell us how you really feel.

I can honestly say I have never hated anyone the way Nick hates Rodgers. Damn dude. Calm down. Don't have a stroke over this.

2 points
8
6
Since'75's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:18 am

@Nick.....
Before you blow a gasket on what Rodgers might say on McAfee's show, maybe wait and see what he actually says, is what you assume he's going to say.
Just sayin.

1 points
6
5
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:23 am

Arrogance seems to go along with some of the toughest jobs in the world, that have the most pressure: surgeons, pilots, NFL QBs. You have to have an incredibly strong belief in yourself, balancing out the fear of failure and carrying that much pressure. You can call it cockiness, arrogance, whatever you want. But many of the best NFL players have it, at QB and at other positions.

You think Brady isn't arrogant? Ever watch one of his tirades?

I love Aaron Rodgers and what he's brought to the Packers. I loved him in his youth, I loved him mid-career when injuries and a stagnant McCarthy offense slowed him down, and I loved even more the resurgence under LaFleur and company. I love the connection he has had with his WRs, the comradery he and team mates feel about each other, his incredible mental acuity in reading defenses, knowing what each player on both teams is doing, remembering plays from years preceeding, praising his team mates, having a sense of humor and yes, playing the media. I love that too. I love that he loves Wisconsin enough to become part owner of the Bucks.

Things he's not done: groped women, sent X-rated unwanted texts, been drunk or high in public, or embarrassed GB in any way. He came in as a gangly kid and became a man, with highs and lows like any man, by all accounts loves his team mates and the fans.

Unlike with #4, I will cheer on #12 whether he land at the Jets, in retirement or by some miracle that would make many of us happy, plays again in the green and gold. I would love to watch him develop chemistry with Watson and Doubs, the way he did with Jordy, Davante and Randall.

Maybe I'll get on the Jordan love train eventually, but I know so little about him as a man and a player; he is just a big question mark.

2 points
9
7
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:31 am

Arrogance works while you win. After that, it can come back to bite you hard. Look to Starr not to Brady if you want a model to compare wise behavior.

6 points
7
1
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:30 pm

Rodgers isn’t going to be around in the league long enough to develop Nelson or Adams level chemistry with anyone. Why do you think he doesn’t want to be part of a rebuild and wants a veteran O? He knows that. He will be 40 this year. Reality is cruel sometimes, but it’s better to grasp it at some point.

1 points
2
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 05:32 pm

WestCoastPackerBacker

"Maybe I'll get on the Jordan love train eventually, but I know so little about him as a man and a player; he is just a big question mark."

Try to find on You Tube Mark Sanches "4th and forever" with Jordan Love. You'll learn a lot about Jordan Love in 38 minutes.

https://youtu.be/ukzRoLkADLA

-1 points
0
1
Since'75's picture

March 16, 2023 at 10:02 am

Sanchez was the 5th overall pick of the Jets, he is living proof there is no guarantee in the draft, it doesn't matter who your QB coach is
It doesn't matter if your a "good guy".

Here is what the experts say determines whether a QB makes it in the NFL or not....

Every first round QB pick has the physical attributes to play in the NFL, they can all spin the ball.
But they say, the transition from college ball to the NFL for QB's, is 90% mental.

That is what determines if you make it in the NFL and how successful you are.

It isn't how you sound in a interview with the 5th pick of the 2009 draft, who was a bust.
************
Recently....some determine a QB's worth on if they can run the football.
See Justin Fields
We have seen the last 15 years how that usually pans out.
No matter how good you are running the football, sooner or later your worth will come down to if you can stay in the pocket and go through progressions without getting rattled.

Make no mistakes, a few running QB's have been able to do that, but it's a small percentage.
This is the NFL...sooner or later running QB's get hurt.

-1 points
0
1
croatpackfan's picture

March 16, 2023 at 11:15 am

It is clear to me that you did not look the story and interviews from your comment. It is not who was or is Mark Sanchez, it is what is said and show in this short video.

I will tell you this - watch the video, what are you affraid of - only this time. So, it is on you. You think that you are better evaluator of QBs than someone who play real game as QB? Good for you.

Or you might reading beans or tea leaves and coming here with conclusion. It looks like that.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

March 18, 2023 at 02:39 pm

Good idea, but.........
I didn't care about Sanchez then, or now, and i had faint interest in a bench player (Love) who couldn't help a team trying to get into a Super Bowl when Love was drafted. Because, again, he was going to ride the bench when we could have added new talent to contribute on the field.
I figured that out all by myself without having to watch a video..

Its terrific how Sanchez mentions how good Loves tape looks, Every player in the draft has "good tape"

I watched that video after it came out a couple years ago.
I wasn't affraid of watching then, and i'm not affraid of watching it now.

I hope for Gute sake, and Packer Nations, that Love has a more promising career than the 5th pick of the 2009 draft.

Hopefully Love will have more TD's passes than interceptions.

Thank you for trying croatpackfan...never give up.

But next time, try to have something substantial to come at me with.
Maybe something that keeps me awake.

0 points
0
0
Turophile's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:34 pm

NickPerry, how do you think Rodgers got to the position he is now in, where he can suggest his friends be a part of a new team ? Is it somehow wicked to try and put yourself in the best position to move forward ?

He got to where he is now, because he was good enough at his job that other influential people want him badly enough that they empower him. Wouldn't YOU like to have the power to control your fate at work, at least in part ?

Part of this hate you have for him comes because he is influential enough (because of the talent he is still perceived to have) to have some control on his future. The selfish arrogant POS you called him would never be able to do what he does without him being empowered by other major players who look for talent.

So how much of the blame does he shoulder and how much is on the shoulders of those who agree to his wishes ?

Look at your choice of words. You say "This list of demands", he makes. Others say his wish-list - do you see the difference your choice of words makes.

Now I made no secret of the fact that i would have traded him before the 2022 season (because I though it was a good business decision back then) and I would still trade him now...............but just because his time with the Packers seems likely to be coming to an end, it doesn't mean I dislike him, or wish to be rude about him. I enjoyed many years of his stellar play and I wish him well wherever he is in the coming season.

-1 points
3
4
croatpackfan's picture

March 16, 2023 at 04:19 am

"Wouldn't YOU like to have the power to control your fate at work, at least in part?"

Who wouldn't? For example I wouldn't. Why? Because with power of control comes responsibility. You and ACR forget that. It is easy to be decision maker from the shadow with no accountability for what you want and do.

If ACR wanted to be GM, I have no problems, but that job also requests accountability. If he wants to be OC, HC or play caller, OK, let it be. But than do not call others for your failure. Or do not act as it was not your job. Many people wrote here that MLF scheme is not good and that his offense is impropriate for the team. All we knows is that ACR had the right to change play calls at the line of scrimmage. But we do not know how often he did that. It is easy to throw over (well he is one hell off a thrower isn't it) responsibility to the lap of the man who should be his superior. And it is not nice to throw over responsibility to his subordinates, also.

If you want power (or might if you like) there is the price you have to be willing to pay (or receive). What I saw last season was the man who take payroll for position of power and did not accept responsibility at the same time.

Everybody (he included) talks how NFL is rude business. Still all of them accepts to be part of that ruddiness, just to complaint when it happen to them. Mark Murphy was right, there is no many players that ended career playing only for one franchise. Packers had few. It is rare in business that you'll stay with one company all your working life. So?

What he wants? That for every player whose contract expires should have farewell party organized by Packers? Is that what he wants? Or what.

I do not say that he is the only reason for Green Bay Packers to have cap issues or misunderstandings between him and organization, but he helped to achieve that level of misunderstandings. When you argue with somebody it is always both parties responsibilities for that argue.

He also said that he would like to get DIRECT and HONEST statement after season ended. When he said something DIRECT and HONEST to the FO? He did not say I will retire, but let me have enough time to think about it - several seasons in the row. Is that direct or not? You know I might do this or that. Let me think about it. OK, he got answer. We do not know how long do you need, but please come with the decision before (put any date you like to put). Because Packers also has needs to know what they will have to do if the decision is this or that. Is that so hard to accept? He said, I do not know, this is the long process, but I knows deadlines. Does he?

He got the info that Packers shopping him around? Did he call the Packers to ask them do they? To get straight and DIRECT and HONEST answer. We do not know. Do we?

So, what he is doing? He is complaining how Packers did not RESPECTED him. Did he RESPECTED Packers?

Many people here do not understand what he is doing. He is playing games with Packers, sending cryptic statements and choosing the words to show he is not the BAD guy, They (Packers) are. When he got cryptic message from Packers, he misunderstood it and now he is hurt how Packers treated him. Remember, Gutekunst said: "We want all our guys back!" Was he thinking ACR is in that group, we DO NOT KNOW! ACR obviously thought he is. I doubt. That was cryptic message from Brian to Aaron he fail to understand. He broke that relation beginning of the draft 2021eve. And cemented it by his press conference he had in the beginning of the TC season 2021. I have no doubt that Brian Gutekunst has some ego to. He has to have to be able to run bunch of the people in business depended on believes, thoughts and evaluations (crystal ball business). And I believe he never forget that off season and will never get over it. I know I wouldn't. Even if ACR said nothing else but the truth, ACR should know that those kind of things in business should and would be discussed behind closed doors.

If I'm at the Gutekunst position I would say to Aaron that we do not see future with him, that we plan to go younger and build the team for the new window to win SB. I would. No matter what Mark "we are not idiots" Murphy would say. I would risk my job for that. But that's me. Brian may have some reasons why he did not do that. Maybe he get tape over his mouth by mentioned Mark? Maybe he was kept away while Aaron was still in the Green Bay. Who knows.

Also, as I recollect, Jets were the first who asked about ACR trade, than it was Panthers, too. Jets were more pushy and Panthers decided not to go through that street. We even got the information that Jet was not the first who asked, it was 49ers. Does that mean shopping?

Did Packers waited ACR to go to darkness retreat to start shopping him? I doubt. Because nobody knows when ACR will do that. He did not report that to anyone except his "inner circle". Even "3 hours long" Pat was surprised when he got ACR on his show before SB. We all thought that he will take that treatment before SB. We were wrong. So, did Packers knew? By Brian Gutekunst statement Packers has very few contacts with ACR during the off season.

So, stop the crap. This situation is product made from both side. I think Packers made some mistakes, ACR did some mistakes. They did not clear their position from the start of the new FO era and it produced a lot of misunderstandings.

Stop believe in everything what any of those parties are saying. This is the business. In business you gave and accept false "promises". Only concrete thing in the business is signed contract. They should start from there. There will be clear who signed it from Packers organization and should be held responsible for all this drama today.

-1 points
0
1
Since'75's picture

March 16, 2023 at 09:35 am

Turophile, nice post.

Also, WCPB, good comments, as usual.
************
One thing about all the fans who seem to have scathing hate at Rodgers. I always smile when i read their comments for a few reasons.....

I'm thankful that i learned long ago when i was much younger. When you carry hate (of any kind) the only one your hurting is yourself.
Because you look shallow minded, it effects your demeanor
Most importantly....the person/thing you hate, might not even know you, or give a ..... what you think.

Life is too short for hate, period.

-1 points
1
2
PackAttack4155's picture

March 15, 2023 at 01:02 pm

He didn't list any demands! The way some treat clickbait headlines, and quotes purposely taken out of context from entertainment "news" sources is crazy. The guy is looking out for his favorite teammates, and ones he knows will make any transition in a new regime easier to non-existent. All are free agents, if he was trying to poach Alexander or Jones, then there's something to be pissed about.

Was listening to him on youtube. He was thankful, objective, and honest. He wasn't going on McAfee's show to announce he's a Jet instead of at their facilities, because he's not a member of the Jets yet! Its all rampant speculation. I suggest anyone even remotely interested watch the interview. Its tough, McAfee is a shit stirring fool, but to hear Rodgers unedited by clickbait "news" is nice. Rodgers still wants to play, Packers don't want him. Is the way it is.

Your comments on Clements are spot on. AR's throwing motion was awful, and he helped correct it. I'm glad he'll be around for at least one more year to continue with Love's development.

0 points
2
2
jlc1's picture

March 15, 2023 at 01:28 pm

Why did he not do it at Jets office? Maybe because he's still a Packer. No formal trade yet but now the Pack gets to get moving on next year.

3 points
3
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:51 pm

Correct. You appear at the Jets' office to sign the contract.

Hell, Schefter is still reporting that the Jets want to re-work AR's contract! I know that AR said he has consented to play for New York, but since I have no idea how to minimize the cap implications for the Jets save for a pay cut or moving the date his 2024 roster bonus becomes fully guaranteed from February 16 to March 18, has he really consented?

I don't think a player has consented until the principal terms of a contract have been agreed upon.

And then there is the draft compensation.

Seems like there is a ways to go, here.

2 points
2
0
Savage57's picture

March 15, 2023 at 06:27 am

Nixon's deal and the possible lack of interest from other teams is probably more of a reflection of how much the kickoff has been watered down in the NFL.

As to Rodgers, the drama, the suspense, the wondering? He's going to a happier place, where the media obsession will be All Rodgers, All The Time. Be careful what you wish for; you might get it.

QB1 is dead. Long live QB1.

15 points
16
1
GregC's picture

March 15, 2023 at 06:52 am

I think that as far as Rodgers is concerned, any attention is good attention. Having said that, I'm not sure that he will get any more attention in New York than he has been getting in Green Bay. There are more things to compete with for attention there.

Hey, I just thought of something: Could history repeat itself one more time after this season? The Vikings may be done with Kirk Cousins by then....

7 points
9
2
jurp's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:13 am

I'm finding it weirdly amusing to watch the Jets jump through the same hoops we jumped through the past two years - and wondering if maybe we can get Elijah Moore in the trade, since they'll have to carry at least two more WRs than they want to. Or maybe Copeland, who may be cut if not traded.

The Vikings love to sign Packers retreads, so it wouldn't surprise me at all if they sign him and Cobb after 23 (assuming a non-playoff season).

10 points
10
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:34 am

if the jets sign cobb and big dog the packers should double the price for Rodgers...

1 points
2
1
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:28 am

jurp! I'm thinking the same.

Elijah Moore is one helluva solid slot WR. Exactly where we could use the help, despite the Packers having added Bo Melton last December.

2 points
2
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:51 am

Jurp,
In every PFF mock trade simulation with the Jet's I always include Elijah Moore in the trade. I keep reading Corey Davis maybe won't be signed, but they just signed Lazard. Seems to me that there might something there with a Jet's WR maybe being included with whatever is happening behind closed doors. Very possible and Moore would be a great addition.

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:43 am

Somewhere in the comments yesterday I guestimated Nixon's cap number at $2.3M as I assumed a max void year deal. Ken Ingalls projects $2.5M to $4.0M depending on the number of void years, if any. I didn't think he'd have $2M for NLTBE incentives.

I didn't think using what little cap space on Nixon was the best use of resources. I can live with $2.5M. We shall soon know the exact number and terms.

4 points
6
2
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:44 am

To keep other teams from snatching him up, while we apply that small amount of cap where?

I'm just curious, TGR. Seems to me, this was a top get for the Packers from their players hitting FA. Seems a very reasonable amount to secure him back onto our roster.

4 points
5
1
dobber's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:14 am

"To keep other teams from snatching him up,"

Don't sign a guy to play keepaway from other teams.

"while we apply that small amount of cap where?"

That's true because there aren't any holes in the depth chart.... ;)

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:44 am

Depth Chart… currently in flux.

That’s my point. Packers/Jets trade potential makes for minute signings only at this stage.

I see GB securing the player at minimal cost, instead of not doing so and allowing him to wonder how much he’s wanted by GB. Securing him to our roster at a bargain price is huge.

My guess is this was an ask by Gutekunst & the Packers.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:52 am

LOL. Have any other roster holes in mind that can be filled, without a doubt, on the same level as Nixon, for that price?

Thinking on it now, getting Nixon in at the lowest price possible was likely on the top of the Packers' "to do list," knowing he is a valuable piece of our STs moving forward, concurrently, while having to assume unknown dead cap hit totals that come with trading players. Think Bisaccia wanted him back? Hell yeah. A detail they didn't want getting lost in the minutia of all the trade workings.

Nixon's deal having been done gives them a better idea of what they have to work with in trade talks, and may open up new options/opportunities.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:58 pm

"Have any other roster holes in mind that can be filled, without a doubt, on the same level as Nixon, for that price?"

I come pretty cheap and can play any position that doesn't require speed, agility, strength, or instincts. My RAS score isn't what it used to be.

Firmly believe they did Nixon because they know he can play quality snaps as a dime CB. I don't know if they bring him back this soon solely as a returner. That extra depth in the CB room generates flexibility for the draft and in how they approach any additional CB help.

3 points
4
1
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:59 pm

that's what I am hoping.

A more cynical part of me wonders about bad teams signing flashy players to provide some excitement on the field and sell tickets. Selling tickets isn't a problem in GB. I remember tuning in to watch Lofton catch passes from Dickey while knowing that the Packers were going to probably lose not just that game but the majority of the games they played that season.

It was fun to watch Lofton.
It is fun to watch Nixon.

But I hope he can play more than 500 decent snaps as a DB.

*If his cap # if $4M, Chuck Clark for one of GB's four 7th round picks would have instantly replaced Adrian Amos. Clark would have been a starter.

3 points
3
0
mnbadger's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:24 pm

very reasonable, especially at only one year. Returners' longevity is typically low.
GPG!

2 points
2
0
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:49 am

I'd have to disagree. He's a difference maker on KO and Punt Returns. Now the punter has to really consider where on the field he is going to try and place the ball. We've gone so long with terrible ST's play that we don't even realize what it can actually do for a team. Him and Coach B will help this team win one or two games all on their own. I think that's worth those dollars.

7 points
7
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:21 am

I see Nixon as being paid very reasonably given his play on D as well as his return performance. If he gets anywhere close to 6 million he’s going to need to repeat on returns and play significant defensive snaps as I understand it.

Perhaps that was the carrot that kept him. Returners are usually short lived if that’s all they can do. If he can establish himself in D that’s more likely to sustain his career and his return skills then compliment that. If he repeats last year on returns, then he’s established as more than a flash in the pan and will command more. Seems like a smart move as long as he can stay healthy, for both parties.

5 points
5
0
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:36 am

Probably true. No different than the lack of interest in RB's. I don't think any have been picked up yet in FA.

I felt the same thing about KO's until we got Nixon and our ST Coach B. He puts fear into the opposing team when returning Punts and KO's. It now became an exciting part of the game for the Packers vs a liability. Before you just wanted the team to kick it out of the end zone and the punt returner to just not fumble and down it.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:27 am

The best value RB available this year is arguably in the draft. That’s likely to chill any big investments. If teams become convinced that they won’t have a shot at him, then maybe someone takes a risk but McCaffrey’s health has already been gambled on and retained by the 49ers, and he, if healthy, is likely the best that was out there.

2 points
2
0
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:13 am

For RB's I think the best value is always in the draft. I was against signing Aaron Jones to a second contract for that amount of money. Is he really good, YES, but you don't have to spend that much to get really good. I would've signed Williams for much less and used the extra money on Lineman.

2 points
2
0
mnbadger's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:27 pm

I lover AJ33 but that's a great take murf7777.
GPG!

1 points
1
0
jurp's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:07 am

I don't think it's a coincidence that Love progressed so much in his first year under Clements. In fact, one could say of both Favre and Rodgers that the Packers didn't trade for/draft two HOF QBs, they traded for/drafted two QBs with tremendous skills and potential and, via Holmgren/Mariucci and Clements, MADE them HOF QBs.

I think Favre realized this, but Rodgers? Apparently not so much.

Having Clements as his coach could very well turn Love into our third HOF QB. Wouldn't THAT fry the shorts of Bears and Vikings fans!

16 points
19
3
T7Steve's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:37 am

Rodgers did credit Clements with helping to develop him and was very happy he was brought back. Remember when he had a poor game early last season (someone here can remind me which one) and said it was actually a good game because Clements said so?

As I've said before I think Clements, and Rodgers not practicing much, was perfect for Love to get reps with the 1s and get dialed in.

10 points
11
1
jurp's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:55 am

Thanks for the correction - I hadn't seen, heard, or maybe just remembered that Rodgers still recognizes Clements' importance to his career.

3 points
3
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:45 am

Yes, he did. He said that he had lot of bumps in the beginning and that when he thought he had very good game, Tom Clements said him: "Not so fast!" He also mention that Tom Clements was able to see small things to be corrected that others do not see. And insists on those details.

2 points
3
1
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:46 am

Clements was a favorite QB Coach of Joe Montana. The guy knows his stuff, inside & out. His staying on to work with Jordan Love is very telling, when he could have literally gone anywhere else.

7 points
7
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:25 am

All speculation about Love's progress but I'd say it very well might be Love finally learned the offense and his reads. Once all that occurs it is much easier to start focusing on your footwork & fundamentals. It all kind of just comes together at that point with everything slowing down for you.

6 points
6
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:56 am

It’s certainly possible. Rodgers took significant strides at about the same time in his tenure, and he’d had Clements and QB schools in addition. Of course it could be both. Clements is a very experienced, good technical QB coach.

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 15, 2023 at 02:48 pm

His biggest area of improvement was to work on his footwork and release point as it was for Favre and Rodgers in the WCO. Get his hips and thighs punching power forward in rotation, just like a tennis player.

0 points
0
0
Since'75's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:29 am

Ok..lol

Lets put the brakes on a bit....lol

Before we start mentioning Love as a franchise QB, or (gulp) a HOF QB, can we......
A) Wait until he has a passer rating over 80?
B) IDK...maybe win his first game?
C) Maybe throw more career TD passes than interceptions?
D) Maybe have more than 650 yards in career passing yards?
E) Have more than 1 start?
F) All of the above.

-3 points
4
7
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:33 am

His own game plan would be a good start

5 points
5
0
T7Steve's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:45 am

I think everyone will hold him to your guidelines or even be more demanding.

We haven't changed QBs very often, so please don't blame optimism.

2 points
2
0
Since'75's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:13 pm

T7......
I don't blame optimism, but my optimism is reality based.

But i'll play....Franchise QB, HOF'er!!....fingers crossed.

The odds can't be that bad for a 3rd HOF in a row on the same team exceeding 3 decades.

But yea, on second thought....i'm sticking with...."all of the above".

0 points
0
0
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:16 am

Many on this site and fans in general go with the flow of the moment and change course so it fits their new narrative. Last year many were saying Love was trash and now that he will be starting QB he has all this potential. you just have to ignore it.

2 points
2
0
Since'75's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:19 pm

Murf....
Part of that new thinking on Love was born from his 6 completions against the eagles in the 4th Quarter down by 14.

I get it, people want to believe, after that happened a lot of fans thought, ok, he's ready!!

That's fine for them, but for me, i have to see more than 3 minutes and 13 seconds and 6 completions, before i crown anyone.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:29 am

The “Lion King” is Love, laying in the sun quietly at the top of the hill surveying the landscape. He’ll be hungry come minicamp.

The “lamb,” is Rodgers being led to slaughter, thrust by his own doing into the world’s largest media market with all the pieces in place. Win the Super Bowl now with this load of talent or your name is mud. He's already got more than half of NY completely pissed off. Nice start, Aaron. 100% on brand. Add OBJ to this mix of unstable elements....? Neither of them are getting any younger. KABOOM!!!

*If Rodgers were truly smart, he'd come clean to get NYJ media & fans on his side by saying he will play 2 years for them, if they can work out a deal with GB. It would get all of the media off his back, and put the pressure square on Woody to cough up the picks, and close this thing out.

March. SMH. McAfee? Totally agree, Al, but I’m not tuning in. Probably best, again, to expect nothing. Again.

Nixon. Spot on, Al. Our top signing. I think he took the one year to help GB, and should things go as he expects, he’ll be extended before year’s end. The players know Love is the answer. I’ll venture to say the locker room will be thrilled to know Jordan Love is the Packers QB1.

My guess is many players will see this QB transition as a breath of fresh air, and are more confident in winning with Love, because they’ve seen the difference in his cannon arm, young legs, and his overall development to lead this Packers offense.

“The time is now.”

Clements. See above. He is loving what he sees enough to guide Love to being his absolute best, with zero distractions.

Sources. It’s laughable. Best to sit back, wait it out and we’ll see. Too many moving pieces. Emotions are high, and all of NYJ world is on pins & needles. Welcome to our world.

CHTV Draft Guide. I can’t wait!

6 points
10
4
calabasa's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:05 am

Dead on. Much of me feels like AR is scared of playing in the spotlight without the midwest nice fanbase. Getcha popcorn ready!

3 points
4
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:27 am

however, that $60 million guarantee is like a mouse trap with a big ole piece of cheese just sitting there.

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:36 am

It's gonna be a different animal, man!!! No doubt.

How many times did we see Daniel Snyder go all-in, only to become a laughing stock? That wasn't just a thing. It was an annual thing.

Get this done, Packers, before the draft... it's best to move on, forward in this "young man's" game.

1 points
1
0
mrtundra's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:29 am

I hope Love has seen the light, in that, when it is his time to leave GB, he avoids all the histrionics and drama the previous two guys gave us.

4 points
6
2
T7Steve's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:45 am

That's what we thought about Rodgers too. Rodgers even says he doesn't want to drag it out like Favre did, as he's doing it. LOL.

To be fair, if Love can put up the HOF numbers and get SBs, I think we can let it slide. it's the price we have to pay every decade and a half or so in GB for greatness. Look at the other NFC North teams and see if they wouldn't trade.

5 points
6
1
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:08 am

I don’t think Love can be expected to put up those numbers early on and we need to be careful not to expect him to. Rodgers didn’t. What we want to see from Love is adequacy and signs of growth. Rodgers should outplay him this year as Favre did Rodgers till hurt. If Rodgers doesn’t then his decline is truly greater than I think we collectively expect or Love should have been playing last season.

Love is almost certainly going to be up and down. That’s experience. We just have to hope that the ups slowly take over and that LaFleur gives him an offense that supports that. In the meantime our cap recovers and guys like Watson and Doubs develop and build a rapport and some others like Toure and even some among the likes of Austin Allen and Melton on the PS emerge along with Wyatt, Walker and Tom do ing do in other facets.

That’s the realistic source of hope for 2024 and beyond. Anything this year is a pure bonus. That should give Love time and we should let it.

5 points
5
0
SoCalJim's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:39 am

My expectations are along these lines, too. I’d be thrilled if the team can win 7 or 8 games in 2023. Ecstatic if most of the wins come against our divisional opponents. If this comes to pass, then 2024 should be the start of some very good years. Fingers crossed and Go Pack Go!

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:24 pm

IF (big if) the O-line stays intact and keeps improving, we could very well be the best team in the division with a game manager, like the 49ers or the Giants of old and are becoming again.

That said, if the D lives up to its potential, we could go on a deep playoff run in the NFC.

I'll give Jordan Love a pass if he needs it, but not the team or the coaches. Their job is to put him in a position to succeed. They have everything or can get everything they need.

0 points
0
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:30 am

MrT,
I sure as hell hope so!

I am wondering if the Packer front office should institute a term limit for the starting QB...kind of what Washington should do for Congress & the Supreme Court? I think everyone would likely agree that for the 1st ten years AR was manageable. Maybe the starting QB term limit for the GBP's is not to exceed 10-years? Either that, or black ball certain player agents?

5 points
5
0
SoCalJim's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:41 am

Hahaha! Trade them away for a big draft haul before they go “full Diva!” Brilliant!

2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:36 am

I don't want Rodgers to Leave.
I have No faith in Love.
I went through the bad years.
Poor management, the QB shuffle
the revolving doors, the change.
And when you see a player go.
The thinking is trader.
Is this good for the franchise.
My answer is No.
That Love was picked too soon.
For a GM who only cared about himself.
And wanted to make history trading Rodgers.
I'm not the naive fan anymore.
And as I watch sports change.
I can't think they're wasting my time now.
I don't want to watch Losing.
A team that changes names likes clothes.
And when those players go back to their
old teams. You have to question the commitment.
The commitment to win.
I'm just not seeing that.
I'm seeing excuses of give a kid a shot.
We're not winning with what we got.
But who got us there in the first place..
The exchange for Rodgers really isn't a
winning solution. It's marketing.
The draft picks or returns won't work.
It just keeps the door turning for Gutey' pocket.

-9 points
8
17
jurp's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:01 am

I won't comment on the rest of your post because it's just beating your same "Rodgers is great, I hate change, Gutekunst is evil, Love's going to be terrible" dead horse, but this line is 100% spot on:

"A team that changes names likes clothes."

This describes major league baseball perfectly, but is something that is not nearly as prevalent in the NFL due to the salary cap, IMO. I'm in total agreement with you in that it really diminishes my interest in the sport. As for "commitment to win", I think some players have a "commitment to money", which I really can't blame them for, although it is disappointing.

5 points
5
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:34 am

Everything comes to an end. Every athlete ages. No QB is unimportant but also no QB can overcome opponents alone. To win they need an at least adequate defense and offensive personnel and depth and competent game planning, strategy, tactics and personnel usage. At the same time they tend to cost more and so do those they want around them. At some point those paths intersect. That was the case a year ago.

Can Rodgers have an Indian summer? He’s got a better chance of that with a Jets roster a lot more like the one that carried Brady to his last Championship. It’s interesting though that Brady lured the likes of Gronk whereas Rodgers is allegedly urging Lewis, Cobb and Lazard on a team where maybe only Lazard makes sense as a role player and also wants oft injured post ACL OBJ. Looking at their roster, it seems that won’t necessarily make it better. Perhaps that’s the difference between him and Brady. If I was a Jets fan I’d be having some qualms if such things come to pass.

4 points
6
2
murf7777's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:56 am

"It’s interesting though that Brady lured the likes of Gronk whereas Rodgers is allegedly urging Lewis, Cobb and Lazard on a team where maybe only Lazard makes sense as a role player and also wants oft injured post ACL OBJ."

I think part of that is the SC situation Tampa Bay was in compared to Jets. Jets don't have much SC to spend, and they won't be getting OBJ if his desire to be paid is 20M. Lewis, I suspect would be a cheap hire and still a very quality blocker for certain sets the Jet's will run.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:22 am

It’s also early. Brady recruited from within. Until the Rodgers trade is finalized one way or the other, the Jets don’t know their cap or have a QB in place to shape their trading. Nevertheless the purported (but unsubstantiated) list is interesting to compare in the current vacuum.

0 points
1
1
NJ-RICK's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:19 am

I've been saying it for many years get a new GM... The front office MGT is failing... This team is going backwards welcome to the 70's and 80's Packer fans. This team needs so much and the draft and develop isn't working with our GM. Every team in the NFC North has enhanced their team so far in free agency and the Packer's sit there and do nothing... FIRE GUTEY..!!!!!!

-9 points
2
11
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:37 am

I think you continue to aim at the wrong target. Unless your beef is just draft picks and FAs, Murphy is the guy who shaped this since TT was officially retired and before by allowing Ball to step in to fill the void.

3 points
6
3
coolhand's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:33 am

The team can't sign big name free agents since they have no cap space. If you do want some big FA signings, who do we get rid of?

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 15, 2023 at 06:47 pm

It's March, we've had to wait 3 months for Rodgers to decide anything. The team is not yet formed. No need for doom and gloom. R.E.L.A.X

0 points
0
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:32 am

SH,
Your support for ACR is impressive but I hope you have some support system in place once his ass is traded. Seriously!

3 points
4
1
Irish_Cheesehead's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:43 am

"news just broke that Rodgers will be on the Pat McAfee show today (Wednesday) at 1PM EST."

Wow, now there's a surprise! My "sources" tell me Al will regret the time he wastes watching it. Good day to shut off the internet and read a good book!

10 points
11
1
Razer's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:47 am

Have specifically set aside that time to paint trim. I may even hang around to watch it dry :o)

13 points
13
0
jurp's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:03 am

I've found MrCoffee's show to be absolutely terrible - really, how is it any different from this site in terms of factual information? And this site doesn't take 3 hours to read.

5 points
6
1
JerseyAl's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:01 am

It's "entertainment." Or at least what passes for entertainment nowadays. I can't watch it for more that 5 minutes, but I will today - like I slow down to look at a car wreck.

7 points
7
0
Razer's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:44 am

...That this whole "sources" thing has gotten way out of hand. It really feels like the NFL encourages it, if not actually enables it somehow...

The NFL loves this kind of circus. It is spotlight and promotion. Legal tampering period - really! From part-time officiating to crazy-ass owners, the game is not in good hands or heading in the right direction.

As for Rodgers - please just let it all be over. It has become a high school drama and not a good one.

One thing bright thing out of this off-season is the resigning and promotion of Rich Bisaccia. Our next head coach is in-the-house.

7 points
8
1
T7Steve's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:48 am

Wouldn't it be great if RB WAS the head coach and MLF was the OC? That maybe would cure the D also.

11 points
11
0
Razer's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:59 am

I think this is the way it should have been. Rich just seems to be a guy who would drive you, keep you accountable and forge a cohesive team. Unfortunately, we have the cart before the horse on this one.

6 points
6
0
jurp's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:04 am

Wait a year, maybe, with Leonhard as DC and someone competent as OC.

5 points
5
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:50 am

LaFleur is going to show us his true colors, whether he wants to or not. He’s retained Barry, so he’s tied himself to how that works out and he’s got a clean slate on O to use any players/formations/plays he so desires. He also should have the only draft/player wish list submitted to Gute this year.

Now we find out if he was the anchor that held Rodgers back or the guy Rodgers prevented from delivering. It looks like Rodgers is trying to ensure that we move in from some of the old guard. Perhaps that forces us to be more adventurous. Perhaps that explains them being locked away and not going to the combine.

4 points
4
0
Razer's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:58 am

Yes, this will be the year that LaFleur needs to demonstrate his head coach skills. Can he make it his team?

3 points
3
0
dobber's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:22 am

How do you change a culture you've been installed over and (tried to) managed for the last 4 seasons? The Titanic couldn't turn on a dime, so it struck that iceberg and sank. Removing someone who creates significant tension and ambiguity in authority can make a difference, but I have my doubts whether the locker room will turn in LaF's favor. They'll need the right player-leaders to step into the leadership void, and they're going to have to start fast to instill confidence. I'm hopeful, but not expecting it.

3 points
4
1
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:32 pm

It's a great point.

On St. Patrick's Day, 2006, Ted Thompson signed the best DT/NT in the NFL as a FA to play for the Packers, Ryan Pickett. Less than 1 month later, prior to the draft, Thompson signed one of the best players in all of football, Charles Woodson.

That's the kind of veteran leadership this new era will need to get past LaFleur's being turned into Aaron Rodgers' bitch. Let's call it what it is. Sad but true.

I don't know if anyone gets past that, and continues - scratch that - is able to lead that same group to any measure of success, minus the culprit. However, everything is impossible until somebody does it.

Guessing all the players know what went on, and they might relish playing for LaFleur the HC, minus the tire tracks across his back, and the driver who put them there...

4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

March 15, 2023 at 01:03 pm

I surely don't disagree: there might be a tremendous sigh of relief coming from that locker room--and from management.

1 points
1
0
PeteK's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:23 am

Most fans feed into it, that's why it's there. As a Packer fan living in NJ, I can't get away from all this nonsense.

7 points
7
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:38 am

PeteK,
Man.....this has to really suck for you! WOW!

What excites me out of this whole cluster f__k is knowing if this trade actually takes place Mr. Aaron Charles Rodgers ass will be about 995 miles from Lambeau field.

1 points
2
1
T7Steve's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:49 am

Think they'll hold joint practices during TC? Wouldn't that be a trip?

3 points
3
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:05 am

T,
You obviously have a very twisted & sadistic side to you don't you?

:)

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:55 pm

"Don't plan for what you think might happen, plan for everything that COULD happen."

Captain (at the time) Horatio Nelson, British Navy

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:44 pm

I knew I liked you, you sick bastard. LOL.

3 points
3
0
Ferrari-Driver's picture

March 15, 2023 at 06:32 pm

GG, I like that comment

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:47 pm

Heard, PeteK.
My cousin lives there. Been trying to share the positives with him, as he's heard all the negatives, for years. He's been a diehard Jets fan for as long as I remember... a lifetime.

Funny thing is, there are positives for the Jets, just like there are positives for the Packers, should they come up with a fair trade together.

One team building for the now, 2023-2024. The other, building for the future, beyond 2023-2024.

1 points
1
0
Guam's picture

March 15, 2023 at 07:52 am

To quote Yogi Berra, "it's deja vu all over again". I am watching Rodgers force another team's management to submit to his roster manipulations in order to secure his services. Apparently Rodgers has to have his posse to continue playing in the NFL. What I can't believe is the management of two professional organizations have caved to this guy's demands in order to have him on their team.

A Rodgers led team has produced one championship in his 18 years in the NFL and he has played rather poorly in a number of other run ups to a possible championship. Yes he is a very talented quarterback, but he has often not played well in big games. And yet he continues to have a Svengali like ability to persuade teams he is the answer at quarterback.

I hope the Jets understand what they are getting, but I doubt it.

11 points
16
5
PeteK's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:29 am

I just hope we're getting some good draft picks in return. At the least a 1 & 3 in 23.

9 points
9
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:18 am

It will be the litmus test. If they do not secure at least a One pick in the deal, it will just be an exercise in money laundering. See if Packertown can play Hardball? I would not want Elijah Moore in any trade. The same guys in the draft can be had with rookie contracts.

2 points
4
2
dobber's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:29 am

Moore's in the last year of his rookie deal, but he's already demonstrated that he can be a problem--MiLaF will be able to give the Packers his side of that story. I think he's really talented, and he's flashed on several occasions, but I don't know if I want to bring in a guy you already know has a history of being a problem child and put him in a young WR group.

Any players you take in return diminish compensation and eat cap.

6 points
6
0
jannes bjornson's picture

March 15, 2023 at 03:01 pm

Charlie Jones, Jayden Reed, Ronnie Bell...

0 points
0
0
MainePackFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:35 am

Guam, Brady asked for Gronk and Antonio Brown. He also wanted Edelman but Edelman said no thanks I'm done. I didn't think that was a big deal, and it obviously worked. I don't personally see a big issue with wanting people that your OC and QB are familiar with, but that's just me. Rodgers knows he's not getting all of his wish list.

7 points
7
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:59 am

Thank you MainePackFan, I did not know that Tom Brady asked for Antonio Brown and Edelman. I only got information that he wanted Gronkowski on the Bucs.

What that tells us. ACR is singing somebody's else song. Even with that he is not original. Interesting...

-1 points
2
3
MainePackFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:09 am

"What that tells us. ACR is singing somebody's else song. Even with that he is not original."

lol. I would be shocked if you didn't see it that way croat : )

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:21 am

Brady wanted players he thought enhanced the roster in Tampa and most particularly Gronk. For much of the season Gronk was not a factor, but, when it mattered, was perhaps the difference. Antonio Brown and others were elite players with age or issues. I suppose one could argue OBJ might still be elite, but equally he might keep what they have off the field. I don’t see Lazard, Cobb or Lewis making a material difference.

There’s a difference in the seeming wish lists and their overlap with existing strengths that seems telling. How many he gets is just one part of it, it’s who he wants and why that is both interesting and possibly revealing. In the end, it was, Gronk aside, the existing core that got Brady another ring. One could argue that the rest of the big names were largely immaterial.

1 points
4
3
MainePackFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:37 am

Lazard is a good fit for the Jets. With Berrios gone, and If Moore is part of the trade, a player like Cobb has value if he can stay healthy (big if). Plus he will be affordable. Now that Lazard has signed, it would be tough to add OBJ at the price tag he would command.

3 points
4
1
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:15 am

“Except perhaps for Lazard as a role player.”

When Rodgers leaves will you cease your endless attempts to justify or defend every facet of his existence? The pretense of being a “reasonable voice” wears thin after a while when the subject is as imperfect as any human. At some point reasonableness requires an ability to criticize as well as praise and proposing theories to expiate.

Rodgers is, regardless of today, no longer our QB. I hope that we aren’t spending time on him much longer. If it works out for him with the Jets, great. He’s not our future and he’s very much flawed like the rest of us, just a lot better at throwing a football in anger, but that age will take and maybe has already started. The 140 plus million in earnings and what he’s made on that is his compensation and comfort due and received. He doesn’t need your endless protection.

Time to move on, but as with Favre, I suspect it’s not yet in the eyes if some till he hangs up his cleats permanently. I guess that’s just going to mean skipping comments again for a year or so. Go to the Jets or stay with the Packers. Do both of you must, but here should be Packer first in focus again very soon.

-2 points
2
4
MainePackFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:03 am

“Except perhaps for Lazard as a role player.”

This is not my quote, but you are responding to me as if I wrote it.

Based on your message, I would say that it is you Coldworld who has a Rodgers issue. I defend what is reasonable to defend, and criticize what I feel should be criticized. Just because you don't agree doesn't make you the final say about all that is true in here, or what opinion I am allowed to express. Feel free not to respond if you don't like what I post. That might be better for both of us : )

"Rodgers is, regardless of today, no longer our QB. I hope that we aren’t spending time on him much longer."

Finally something we can agree on.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 12:02 pm

The quote is from an earlier post of mine on the subject. I assumed you would be following the thread not just intervening to be shield bearer for your idol.

I have no issue with Rodgers for the simple reason that I respected him as a football player on field, as I did Favre, not for what he does or thinks off the field. That doesn’t mean that I find him to be tactically brilliant or even a good person , it means that he has been a damn good QB and hasn’t done anything I can see that was illegal or obviously harmful directly to others. I look at all sports and other stars that way. The only QB that I really treat differently is Bart Starr and he earned that after he played as much, if not more than when he did.

So no, I have no issue with Rodgers except that he doesn’t make sense here any more. I’ve never commented on his socio-political views because they have not hurt the team or helped it. As to whether he’s a bad influence on the roster and coaching I have long stated the belief that it’s mostly coaching.

I may not feel he plus this roster, cap and coaching make sense, but I’ve also been clear that I think the leadership played a bigger role in not getting another ring. I don’t, unlike you, feel it necessary to defend his every statement or action. He’s a flawed human like Favre, like Brady, like you and I. He’s no saint and he’s no tactical genius in personnel or off field matters (something Brady might have a claim to, begrudgingly).

Rodgers will have his name up in Lambeau and be in the Hall of Fame within this decade. That’s just reality. That’s really the next time I will be invested in Rodgers, after he confirms he has moved. I had hoped he’d save us from ourselves last year, but he still can now.

Before Canton, much sooner in fact, we will see his and other reputations changed by what happens when he takes the field for the Jets and what LaFleur shows without him. Both are inevitable, only one really interests me because only one impacts the Packers.

If you want to eulogize or defend his every trait, utterance or move, I am sure Jets fans will have an interest starting out. Here, we can hopefully be focused on our QB, coaches and roster. None of whom are ever likely to match the perfection and vulnerability that you see in Rodgers so clearly. That’s a good thing because it’s realistic.

My fervent hope is that Rodgers confirms the trade has/is being sealed today and that those who wish to dwell on his persona constantly enjoy doing so amidst his new fans in New Jersey.

He’s an ex Packer whose legacy is soon to become much clearer. If he wins as a Jet, good for him. He and we weren’t winning it here. If he isn’t better than Love is this year then either Love should have started last year or Rodgers decline is much greater than thought. Favre quite clearly outplayed him till he tore his bicep in 2008. If LaFleur really shines without him, well then it won’t look so good for Rodgers. I do hope you won’t be too conflicted if so.

-1 points
2
3
MainePackFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 03:05 pm

"Lazard is a good fit for the Jets. With Berrios gone, and If Moore is part of the trade, a player like Cobb has value if he can stay healthy (big if). Plus he will be affordable. Now that Lazard has signed, it would be tough to add OBJ at the price tag he would command."

This is my post that you responded to with your rants. Seems like an odd time to go off on your tangent.

Lets move on Coldworld. You ignore my posts and I will ignore yours. This interaction is nonsense and brings nothing of value to the discussion.

0 points
0
0
coolhand's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:52 am

Sure, Brady wanted Gronk, an exceptional talent at TE and a winner. Rodgers wants Marcedes Lewis, who is a great guy, but no where close to Gronk level at TE.

4 points
4
0
MainePackFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:35 am

Lewis would be the least likely if you look at the Jets roster. They have 3 TE's under contract. The point is that it isn't unprecedented for a QB to want to bring players with them. It's only a big deal if someone is trying to make it a big deal.

It's up to the Jets to decide who on that wish list (posse) would improve the team. Maybe the only one they will sign is Lazard. Either way it's not our problem.

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:59 am

I think Rodgers is trying to get his buddy the record for most seasons for a TE. A nice gesture, and I hope it works out.

1 points
1
0
Guam's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:50 am

MPF: My issue isn't with Rodgers asking, it is with management caving. Will the Jets really be better off with Cobb, Lewis, OBJ and/or Lazard? I highly doubt it. Making an NFL team older is rarely a good path. The Jets have a good young roster short one QB and that should have been enough selling pitch for Rodgers. I think Rodgers is weakening the Jets roster to satisfy his need for a posse and the Jets management should have said no. They have no more intestinal fortitude than the Packers management.

2 points
2
0
Packer_Fan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:11 am

In advance of the announcement today, here are my polluted thoughts:
1. I am glad and relieved it is over. Good luck Rodgers.
2. Whatever the compensation, if feels good no longer to be held hostage. At least I hope the Packers received enough to buy a party sized bag of potato chips. Anything less and I will be steamed.
3. I am pleased how the front office acted. They gave Rodgers every chance to let him choose. As a stockholder, a decent way to say goodbye to a hall of famer.
4. I am so happy we no longer have to deal with Rodgers. I remember when Rodgers won the superbowl, he told his mom he wanted to be the best person. Wonder what happened. He sure isn't acting that way.

11 points
14
3
Razer's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:47 am

Well said. I think that the organization handled itself well. Other than someone needing to punch Murphy in the head, the Packers played this fairly well (a year late).

6 points
6
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:52 am

Rodgers actually "told his mom" something in 2010? So it has only been 13 years since he talked to his parents?

Danica Patrick did state a year or so ago she tried to broker a deal between Rodgers and his parents. In fact his parents mailed wrapped Christmas gifts to both Rodgers and Danica after her efforts. She said Rodgers returned them...unopened.

Complicated fella.

0 points
5
5
croatpackfan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:00 am

"Complicated fella."

You are very soft towards ACR.

-1 points
1
2
marpag1's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:12 am

Given our current situation, we should probably call it "The Idles of March."

4 points
5
1
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:16 am

Silence of the Lamb -
I wouldn't be surprised if the Packers told him that.

Silence of the Lion -
I'm curious to see what Rodgers has to say. Hopefully he is open and honest. I'd love for him to say that he wanted back in GB but they didn't want him back. Something along those lines. We will see in a few hours though.

Beware the Ides of March -
I just hope he is open and honest.
The last time he was on Pat McCaffee when Pat made a comment of him coming back to GB, and Rodgers kind of did an eyeroll. Obviously then he knew what was going on. Hopefully this time he says exactly what happened and how it got to this point.

Keisean Nixon -
Great move in resigning Nixon. I like that they did a 1 year deal to make sure it wasn't a 1 year wonder kind of thing as a returner. But this will allow them to resign him this year if they want to.

Clements/Love -
Definitely have to believe Clements was very valuable for Love. Hopefully another year with Clements, Love can take a big jump.

My Sources Say -
My sources tell me that the Packers put a 2nd round tender on Yosh.

And don't forget:
We are about a month and half away from the draft. I can't wait!

1 points
3
2
MainePackFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:58 am

RC. I think he will say things similar to what he said about a month ago on McAfee.

He would love to have retired a Packer.
He understands the teams decision to go younger.
He holds no hard feeling toward the team
He is appreciative of the Organization, the fans and the city.

He knew then that it was doubtful he would be back in GB this year.
You never know with AR though : )

2 points
4
2
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:18 am

Maine,

I agree with you on what he will most likely say.

I just would love full on truth. And I get why it won't happen. I just would love it.

2 points
3
1
bottlefliper's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:48 am

Some people believe a guy who was never honest?
Who lost all the big games?
Who was a trerrible leader and shame for the Packers?
Who throws everyone under the bus since 10 years?
Who has trust issus with everone besides his buddies?

.......so if there is someone left who believe a single thing from him, there is no wonder what we see in general....

Let him sink the Jets

1 points
3
2
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:02 am

Nice first comment on this website. Welcome to the page. Unless this is another account and you were previously a different name on this page, then welcome back.

-1 points
1
2
Racingdad's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:08 am

I think it’s safe to say clements staying means he sees a lot of talent in j love so happy he ‘s still here and not demanded in ny I’m so excited for the fresh new start in gb and yes please don’t expect 10 to be 12. Same as 12 was not 4 But he will be 10 his way just pray he does not become a diva !! Everyone please take the time to watch pack-a-day podcasts from Monday and today Andy explains a lot. S H should watch Several times he just might find answers as to why gb has/is making the moves they are !!

1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:21 am

I am guessing Clements Loves developing guys. He did a tremendous job with Rodgers, and we all saw the improvement this past year with Love. Hopefully he can take another step with him and improve him more.
Would be great if he could have the QB school again though.

Sorry I can't watch pack a day podcasts. I did until Andy blocked me on twitter for literally asking him a question. So, until he unblocks me, I won't be supporting him.

2 points
3
1
x24's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:41 am

"Logged out due to inactivity"

8 points
9
1
Razer's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:54 am

Too funny. Thanks for the morning chuckle

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:42 am

When it comes to Rodgers...it is more "The Silence of the Ham."

The talking heads on sports channels last night were anything but silent... bemoaning Rodgers antics. I did not hear one NFL "expert" excited about Rodgers joining the Jets. Hilarious. A few were saying "I wonder if the Jets are getting cold feet...will they pull the plug on this deal...are they regretting going after Rodgers"?

Rodgers is setting himself up to over promise and under-deliver with all his demands and should he stumble the NY press will be merciless.

I expect Rodgers is enjoying the national sports media spotlight. But when you play with fire...

0 points
4
4
greengold's picture

March 15, 2023 at 01:08 pm

Thanks a lot, LP.

Now, I have Monty Python's "Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam." stuck in my head.

0 points
0
0
Racingdad's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:52 am

I read an article stating packers are prepared to wait until just before draft day to finalize the trade in hopes of getting what they want ( pk 13 plus Elijah moore or jermaine Johnson ). So be prepared for possible 5 wks of this bs -sure hope not. But the packers DO have leverage in this deal. What can jets do now that they are signing his posse -BUT I hope it’s over soon. We all know he’s going there. Thanks to ar-12 for all you did for gb - but it’s time for LOVE NOW

2 points
4
2
Coldworld's picture

March 15, 2023 at 08:57 am

I doubt the Jets are. I read and discounted that article.

2 points
2
0
MainePackFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:17 am

They signed Lazard because he is a good football player. The Jets don't have that big physical possession/blocking WR who helps in the red zone on their roster, and he's only 27. It was a good fit for them regardless of Rodgers.

Now if they sign Cobb and Big Dog, you might be onto something regarding the posse : )

-1 points
1
2
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:59 am

Maine -

Also they signed Lazard because of Hackett. He knows the offense that Hackett will be running and will be a good fit for him there.

1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:22 am

Packers do have leverage. And why give up Rodgers for nothing.

No, they have to ask for max value and the negotiate on something slightly less.

Jets are all in on this deal. So prove it. Give us what we ask for him.

1 points
1
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:44 am

The Packers have a lot of leverage, as well as the Jet's.

Also, in terms of AR both teams have leverage with him as no one in their right mind would walk away from $60 million. Ain't happening!

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 11:04 am

With Baker now signing with the Bucs, that is one less QB for the Jets to try and get.

So they could just go back to Wilson I guess.

1 points
1
0
BirdDogUni's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:08 am

Hey Al - In reference to Nixon, you forgot the "t" in stay... Stay with his old coach... ; )

Personally, I just don't understand the whole hand wringing thing over the AR situation. I also find it comical that people hate he goes on PMS to speak his mind. I find his appearances on PMS to be entertaining. I commend AR for his loyalty to his inner circle. His loyalty to his guys, (whoever they might be.)

Personally, I don't feel any of this is AR12s fault. He said multiple times over the years he wanted to retire a Packer. I think it was handled in exactly the wrong way. I think maybe Gutey wanted his "TT" moment and forced it way too early when he moved up to draft Jordan Love. I do understand why he did it, I just think he was wrong to do it when he did. All signs pointed to AR12 playing into his 40s. Why force AR12s hand? Why draft his replacement at all? I get it. TT trained Gutey to prepare for the future. To draft and develop. I totally get it, but after the #4 drama and forcing him out the door, why go down the exact same path? It didn't make sense to me.

I like Gutey, but this whole situation was perpetuated by Gutey himself. Like I said, I understand why he did it. So he might have some leverage against AR12, but in my opinion, it totally backfired on the organization. Yes I was one of the guys that believed the drafting of Love lit a fire in AR12 and propelled him to his two back-to-back MVP seasons, but the rub was it would also eventually force Gutey's hand to play his guy, which is where we're at now...

After the Favre fiasco, I would've went the exactly opposite direction. I would've done everything I could to surround AR12 with as many weapons as possible. I wouldn't have drafted his replacement until he announced his retirement. In fact, I may have waited until the year after his retirement. What would have been wrong with having Danny "Dimes" Etling backing up Aaron Rodgers? Or bringing in a guy like Jimmy G for a year after AR12 retires, and then draft his replacement? Just to avoid the same BS drama we went through with Favre?

I almost think Gutey did it on purpose. When the whole world is talking about the Packers every off season, it can only help them, right?

While I do think Jordan Love is ready and he's waited as long as possible, I think this could've all been handled very differently.

Imagine if Gutey would've traded up ahead of the Vikings and drafted Jefferson instead of drafting AR12s replacement how different the last 3 seasons may have been. I certainly don't think we would be where we are today.

Packers GMs stubbornly "NOT" drafting weapons for Favre and Rodgers is almost criminal. Yeah, you can name all the great 2nd round WRs you want, but the point is, it was almost like TT and Gutey were petulant teenagers, refusing to bring in top end talent at the WR, TE, and RB positions. They were smarter than everybody in the room and could get by with 2nd rounders, mid-rounders, and UDFAs...

You can be mad at AR12 for going on PMS all you want, but I hold Gutey totally responsible for where we are today! Meaning if Love is in fact our 3rd HOF QB in a row, it's all his fault.

PS: What if AR12 suggested bringing Tom Clements back for Jordan Love's development and to hold himself accountable?

-5 points
2
7
RCPackerFan's picture

March 15, 2023 at 09:45 am

I agree with a lot of what you said here.

I don't get why people don't like listening to him go onto the PMS. Its entertaining. I would rather listen to that then the normal scripted crap that we don't get any truth to it. Pat is entertaining.

The part I disagree with is when you said that none of this is Rodgers fault. He does need to have some accountability to some of this stuff. Now we don't know what happens behind the closed doors there, but I think he could have handled some things a bit differently that wouldn't have gotten us to where we are at.

But it was GB that drafted Love. And I believe it was GB that leaked that Rodgers wasn't happy before the draft. And I believe it was GB that leaked other info.

I did say that the other day about how different the last 3 years would have been had they not drafted Love. If he would have traded up and drafted Jefferson instead. Who knows, maybe in 20 or 21 we end up winning a Super Bowl. who knows. But we can probably say that the last 3 offseasons go very different.

-1 points
1
2
BirdDogUni's picture

March 15, 2023 at 10:49 am

I think our priorities in the draft since 2002 were swayed by Javon Walker...

I think the organization just said, "% it, we won't draft WRs in the 1st round anymore if this is what ends up happening..."

No matter what happens, I hold Mark Murphy and Gutey responsible. Good or bad...

0 points
1
1