5 Takeaways From Packers 13 - 16 Panthers: Tucker Kraft Injury a Crushing Blow
The Packers offense will need to fundamentally change without Kraft as the focal point of the passing attack.
By markoldacres

Tucker Kraft injury a crushing blow
If the Packers’ biggest issue from yesterday was that they lost at home as two-touchdown favorites, turning the page and moving on to the next game would be a fine mindset, but Green Bay also likely lost Tucker Kraft for the year.
Kraft was establishing himself as one of the elite tight ends in the NFL, so the injury is painful not only for the offense of which he was a focal point, but for the player who saw his breakout season cruelly cut short.
Green Bay is fortunate to have a former second-round pick in Luke Musgrave to turn to, but he is almost the opposite profile of tight end to Kraft, and the foundation of the offense will need to be reworked moving forward.
It is not an exaggeration to say Kraft’s injury could end up being the type of obstacle that prevents the Packers from going all the way in the postseason.
Brandon McManus is becoming a problem
With Lucas Havrisik still on the roster, but inactive, McManus started for the second straight game and once again missed a kick, his third in the last two weeks, and his second from inside 50.
Matt LaFleur admitted after the game that McManus is still working through injury, so it begs the question why the team would keep sending him out there if his performance is going to be impeded.
The obvious answer is that the Packers and McManus didn’t feel the quad would impact him, but whether it is the injury, or just simply poor execution, the kicker situation is now firmly a talking point with Havrisik, who hit a franchise record field goal two weeks ago, waiting in the wings.
Matt LaFleur’s Packers beat themselves
As disappointing as it was, Green Bay’s loss to Cleveland was explainable due to the ravaged nature of their offensive line going up against a lethal defensive front. There is no excuse for yesterday’s result.
To boil it down to the simplest explanation, the Packers lost because of what they did in and around the red zone, which was repeatedly shooting themselves in the foot.
They reached the Carolina 20 and came away with zero points on three separate occasions. Even kicking three field goals on those drives would have likely meant a comfortable win for Green Bay.
LaFleur’s decision making and play calling on key downs and in crucial situations was simply not good enough.
He is a great coach overall, and losing to the Panthers is not the end of the world, but these are issues the head coach absolutely has to get corrected before it loses them a playoff game.
Offensive rollercoaster continues
Despite the fact the numbers look pretty good for the Packers in terms of their ability to run the ball on Sunday, that aspect of the offense is still not fully clicking, and most of Green Bay’s wild swings on offense drive to drive can be attributed to that.
Passing the ball has more variance than running it, and with the Packers having to rely on dropping back to consistently move the ball, it is not surprising to see a lack of rhythm and consistency from Jordan Love and the offense.
It is easy to get frustrated with LaFleur’s stubbornness with the run during the game, but they are not going to improve without repping it, and they have to try to get some real traction on the ground if the offense is to be more stable week to week.
Defense must get off the field quicker
Placing any real blame on the Packers defense for yesterday’s result seems harsh, as they only gave up 16 points, but throughout the season, opposing offenses have often been mounting long drives each time they get the ball.
The bend and don’t break strategy is perfectly valid, and has mostly worked out for Green Bay this year, but they are not ending enough offensive drives early. Even Xavier McKinney’s interception came in his own end zone.
Micah Parsons having only one pressure on the day certainly did not help matters, but they have to start creating more negative plays for the offense and not allowing teams to play for 3rd or 4th and short.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres
__________________________




Comments (79)
stockholder
November 03, 2025 at 10:37 am
MLF has a problem.
Either he becomes a pass first offense.
Or he'll find his ass fired.
It's just that simple.
He doesn't have the backing of management.
Rodgers is gone. That problem was terminated.
Love has their heart.
The NFL is about passing first.
And Mlf better change his scheme.
To fit Love; whether he likes it or not.
Major Snafu
November 03, 2025 at 02:30 pm
Oh I think LeFleur knows exactly what he is doing. He knows how bad the pass d is and that the D cant get off the field in 3 and outs so he brainiac solution, you run the ball and try and play ball control to keep your stinkin D off the field as long as possible.
I also dont think he is that high on Love. My guess, its the mistakes he makes in practice. Why does lefleur go run run screen inside the 20 and never a play to pass into the end zone. Has to be lack of confidence in Love not tossing a pick.
Packerpasty
November 03, 2025 at 05:16 pm
why should he have a lot of confidence in Love?? The dude is a middle of the road QB still making the same mistakes and is not accurate at all on any deep balls....he should have at least 3 ints on his bombs away balls the last two games...MLF and Love are mediocre as far as todays NFL goes...many coaches better than MLF and same goes for QB's....
stockholder
November 03, 2025 at 08:36 pm
Bad quarterback play will make everything look bad,
including the coaching staff, and surrounding talent.
But Love is Gute's choice.
They rewarded him with a big contract.
So his development time period, is over.
Love is this offense. For better or worst.
MLf has lost control of this offense.
It's to complicated for guys that
just want to show off their arm.
Taking short cuts, result in picks.
T7Steve
November 03, 2025 at 10:38 am
Maybe Kraft isn't hurt as bad as I thought. I've had knee injuries and have seen other NFLers carted off before and if they have a bad knee injury, they wouldn't let them hang off the back of the cart that way. It would be painful and a bump or anything jarring the cart could cause greater injury and pain to the already injured knee.
ReggieWhite92
November 03, 2025 at 10:42 am
I hope you're right amigo
T7Steve
November 03, 2025 at 12:15 pm
Guss my wishful photo diagnosis didn't take, according to Aaron.
Poor kid.
Musgrave will have to hit another gear, but I believe he's capable of it. Might have to use tackle eligible to replace Kraft's blocking ability because the other TEs can't match him.
Mister Chievous
November 03, 2025 at 01:29 pm
Musgrave? lol. Musgrave is a bust.
Brewcity_BearsFan
November 03, 2025 at 11:20 am
Torn ACL. Confirmed. Season over
bjkdad44
November 03, 2025 at 09:15 pm
🤞🏻🙏🏻🤞🏻
ReggieWhite92
November 03, 2025 at 10:43 am
How many times did we punt yesterday?
Now what does that tell you?
MitchAnthony
November 03, 2025 at 10:45 am
Go sign Marcedes Lewis. He's waiting on the Denver PS. Two big reasons.
1) The line needs help with blocking and Lewis is a great blocker. He can still catch but don't ask for YAC.
2) Lewis is older than dirt. Having him on the team will bump the age average up and finally we can quit talking about that youngest team BS. I'm totally for that.
:)
Major Snafu
November 03, 2025 at 02:32 pm
This whole fn team needs help, they always need help, same problem different day is all. Pass D is the worst in football. Run game isnt working that well. Receivers are missing in action. O line is a shambles, line backing is average, and the pass rush is one guy.
Packerpasty
November 03, 2025 at 05:17 pm
same old packers in other words..
THESZOTMAN1
November 03, 2025 at 10:50 am
I'll give you my 5:
1) Our STs are who we thought they were. Muffs, holding, you name it. Can't count on FGs from McManus. (And we got a kid who's perfect on the season, including a 61 yarder.) I know we paid McM a lot of $$, but it's time. At least we blocked that 48 yard extra point.
Wow!
2) God Almighty, are we the WORST 1st half football in the NFL? Maybe we purposely play bad so we can have a miracle comeback.
3) Run defense. I quote Wayne Larivee: "They haven't stopped them all day." AND "Who woulda thunk it." Who, indeed.
4) Most indicative drive of day. Last one before half. Kraft for 10. Doubs for 30. Brooks for 16. Inc, 4 yd pass, incomplete. 4th and goal. We take the 3.
5) If we were expecting another Steeler's game, sorry......
The Szotman
HawkPacker
November 03, 2025 at 10:51 am
I suggested that the Packers let Havrisek do the kicking until he royally F's up! But noooo, let's put the other guy in there.
Look Matt, Havrisek has not missed a kick so why not let him kick. If he works out, we can save on the CAP.
Also, hope that Tucker is not as hurt as bad as it sounds.
Major Snafu
November 03, 2025 at 02:36 pm
McManus is being paid the big bucks, is Gutts guy and he must play to justify the money we puked our guts out on.
I remember Zimmer fired a young draftee who missed to key field goals in a game and the Vikes lost. Zimmer fired the kid. One announced asked Zimmer why he didnt just keep him and develop him and Zimmer replied " were in the win now mode not the development mode".
LambeauPlain
November 03, 2025 at 10:53 am
"Matt LaFleur admitted after the game that McManus is still working through injury, so it begs the question why the team would keep sending him out there if his performance is going to be impeded."
Agree Mark. Good question. Just what is the uber paid Bisaccia good at? He certainly is not a FG whisperer. Obviously LaFleur delegates everything on STs to him...as he does to most things not Offense.
And you lost me with LaFleur's Packers again "beating themselves" stating: "He is a great coach overall..."
At just what is LaFleur great at?
Motivating the team for a winnable game?
Coaching the entire team?
Installing an effective, efficient game plan to attack opponents' weakness?
Play calling?
In game adjustments?
Player decisions on who plays, who sits, who on the depth chart is better?
Avoiding the status quo team management?
Making bold change with personnel who are below expectations?
He is certainly not a great HC. Probably not even a great OC...maybe good, but too many DC's find ways to confound him and it surprises him when they do. Maybe his calling is as a QB coach.
The remaining games only have the Giants as a huge underdog...even then. Ed Policy is not sleeping well. This offseason could be his trial by fire.
Maybe the OL will finally get fixed at midseason, perhaps Tucker avoided the worst, DL will toughen, STs will be become average, and LaFleur turns the team into a physical, hard nosed team top to bottom...one to be feared.
Maybe. I confess yesterday was a huge blow to what I believed the Packers might become. Wonder how the team attitude is? Attitude drives behavior. One game can propel a team...igniting wins, or infuse doubt and a "here we go again" attitude.
murf7777
November 03, 2025 at 11:00 am
"He is a great coach overall..." At just what is LaFleur great at?"
For all of his faults he's great at...........The biggest criteria, winning!
Just win baby!
LambeauPlain
November 03, 2025 at 11:39 am
Great at winning? Not at beating less talented teams consistently as a huge favorite. Not at winning the biggest games. Not winning deep in the playoffs (3-5 playoff record).
In his 7th year, "greatness" would have won him a Lombardi...or a few NFC championships, or a Head Coach of the Year once or twice...maybe routinely in the top 3 or 4? (the NFL does not view him as a "great" HC)
The very best one can say is he has won more games than he has lost...and lost more big games than he wins.
Major Snafu
November 03, 2025 at 02:39 pm
LeFleur doesnt have the greatest players either. I once thought when we had Barry and his predecessor, maybe its not them? Maybe they came up with this elephant crap and all these strange formations on defense because they had shitty players.
We still have shitty players.
CanPackFan
November 03, 2025 at 03:22 pm
LaFleur seems to think that loyalty over winning is more important. He said myself that McManus is struggling with an injury. So why in the world does he leave Luke inactive after he (1) hasn't missed a kick, and (3) set a record a game ago for longest kick? Many of us would rather see a coach with an urgency to win vs LaFleur who coaches not to lose!
TarynsEyes
November 03, 2025 at 10:57 am
"He is a great coach overall"
Here is where the willing ignorance comes into play for many a fan, writer, analyst, etc.
"but these are issues the head coach absolutely has to get corrected before it loses them a playoff game".
This is what makes the previous part of the quote so ignorantly misguided.
A great HC wouldn't be suffering from the same afflictions for 7 years. MLF does nothing great, less his greatness to repeat his weaknesses over and over....He's also great at making the talent of players look equally disappointing.
Is the picture of why Rodgers and MLF butted heads becoming a tad clearer? Rodgers, unlike Love, would never have stood for this bs sitting in a corner.
panda
November 03, 2025 at 11:07 am
Agreed
murf7777
November 03, 2025 at 11:21 am
"Is the picture of why Rodgers and MLF butted heads becoming a tad clearer? Rodgers, unlike Love, would never have stood for this bs sitting in a corner."
That's part of the problem with Head coaching. In Today's sports world, many of the top players have more power than the HC. No player should have any say in how the HC runs his team. But yet you seem to be advocating just that. Rodgers was and is his own worst enemy.
TarynsEyes
November 03, 2025 at 11:34 am
When the HC keeps losing games that should be won, by all means, every player should sit muted and watch it happen more and more.
Coldworld
November 03, 2025 at 01:39 pm
After more than 100 games, the idea that LaFleur is a great play caller is risible. Evidence not hype. LaFleur is simply a failure some as a savior. Some people just can’t let go of that fantasy and look at the results. For the rest of us, if Policy didn’t wish to extend him last winter, there’s precious little chance he will next. The game is up.
Guam
November 03, 2025 at 11:58 am
Murf: You do realize that prior to about 1970, QBs used to call all the plays and HCs and OCs called none of the plays? Substitutions were rare and players usually only came out when injured. Players used to have more power over the play of the game than they do today.
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 01:00 pm
Pretty weak sauce. IT's not Lafleur who is turning it over or missing FGs.
PackerBackerAZ
November 03, 2025 at 02:01 pm
It is LaFleur that calls long pass plays when he knows Love has accuracy issues long. It's LaFleur that keeps giving the ball to Love, in crucial situations, where he's known to have decision making problems.
It's LaFleur that starts a less than 100% McManus, with a quad injury, instead of a 100% healthy Havrisik.
A case can be made that LaFleur is responsible.
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 02:20 pm
Is LaFleur the guy with one of the all-time highest winning percentages? His .671 win percentage trails only Sirianni and Harbaugh among active coaches and is 13th all time.
Or games over .500. He is 37 games over, 8th best among active coaches (all of whom have been coaching longer. )
A very bad offensive performance....one of the worst of LaFleur's tenure. I think it's a legitimate criticism that the offense has come up too small a couple of times, especially in playoffs and against Cleveland and certainly yesterday.
13 points does not get it done, and if that's all we've got then we might as well tell the Eagles we forfeit. We've got to do better. If we can't do better then we'll have to fix that.
Packerpasty
November 04, 2025 at 10:31 am
lets see him do something in the playoffs..
edp1959
November 04, 2025 at 11:09 am
And we all know who is the one player that is responsible for the .671 winning percentage.
Mister Chievous
November 03, 2025 at 02:22 pm
it is lefleur who passed on a field goal on 4th and 8 that cost us the game
Packerpasty
November 03, 2025 at 05:22 pm
when I read the line that "he is a great coach overall" I almost ruined the keyboard spitting out my beer in laughter.....he's an absolutely mediocre NFL coach who's had some pretty good teams...no wonder he got so many eye rolls from Rodgers...he's incredibly dense at the worst of times...
bjkdad44
November 03, 2025 at 09:24 pm
“He is a great coach overall “… NO HE’s NOT!!!
Aldo
November 03, 2025 at 11:10 am
Just too much rinse and repeat with LaFleur. Too many times standing at the podium making excuses. Same goes for Love. They fail to execute far, far too often. They fail to be ready for too many games. For quite a while, I have had my doubts about the coaching staff. Yesterday only served to reinforce that feeling.
Mister Chievous
November 03, 2025 at 02:23 pm
love is making farve-like stupid throws like the one he heaved into triple coverage yesterday
retirerodgets
November 03, 2025 at 05:29 pm
Agree. This team has consistently underperformed and that is on the coaching staff. MLF can ca some decent plays but he is not a head coach. Time to bring in someone who will have these players playing to their ability. They have lost 2 winnable games and tied 1 another. Hi
Snap the ball
November 03, 2025 at 11:12 am
We can’t beat good Defense teams
Looked who we beat and lost two
Other than the lions game home opener
Haven’t played like that since
Can’t beat a top 10 defense
Snap the ball
November 03, 2025 at 11:19 am
Wide receiver routes nothing to throw at there back to Love at the time .
We run away from d backs so they can make a play on the ball
Run towards them then cut. That’s how you get open
Yesterday all I would hear is and another packer first down.
I called it first down sit down. That’s all they did. No yac at all.
Can our wide outs catch the ball and run for once other than sit down or run out of bounds on an out route.
Reed and Wicks can’t get back quick enough.
Playing in pistol and shot gun yesterday no one is talking about. You can’t win in the nfl without PLAY ACTION……..
2nd down. Run Jacob’s We run on second down more than any team
No more first down sit down.
Can we run a play and hit someone in stride ….
ricky
November 03, 2025 at 11:28 am
The Packers made Adam Stenavich the OC back in 2022. Although he doesn't call the plays, one has to believe he has at least some input into offensive planning for upcoming games and, quite possibly, some input on what plays are called during the game. Before that, he was an outstanding offensive line coach. But there is a problem.
Since moving up to the OC position, the offense has regularly shown a lack of cohesion or sense of rhythm in the play calling. And the OL has suffered, since the team just promoted Luke Butkus to the OL coach (was this recommended by Stenavich?). Now, you have an offense that sputters and an OL that is mediocre, at best. The worst of two worlds.
The team needs to explore if they could get Stenavich back to his area of expertise, the OL, and bring in an offensive coordinator to be a sounding board, and someone MLF will listen to when changes need to be made in the play calling needs to be changed to take advantage of what the defense is offering.
CanPackFan
November 03, 2025 at 03:28 pm
Steno was offered the OC role because GB thought they'd lose him to another team. He's just not a true OC. And LaFleur is wearing one hat too many at the best of times. And our Oline under Butkus has gone way down hill.
Ferrari-Driver
November 03, 2025 at 11:36 am
"He is a great coach overall"
Mark, perhaps you may want to reconsider the use of the word "great" in your quote. If you use "great" here for LaFleur what are you going to use to describe him if he wins a couple of Super Bowl games and becomes a multiple time coach of the year.
Mister Chievous
November 03, 2025 at 02:26 pm
I don't think we have to worry about that
Snap the ball
November 03, 2025 at 11:42 am
They had the ball 6 times that’s it. 6 times ….
They run 54 play we ran. 63 crappy plays..
We had the ball 8 times
8 times and get nothing. And lucky they called it a td…..
Once again they only had the ball 6 times. 6. Times
And they go out with a win.
I don’t believe much play action
When I see that chance of winning goes down by 70 percent.
Ie aaron Rodger’s last year in Green Bay
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 12:58 pm
You might want to recount those possessions. Alternating possessions makes an 8-6 split highly unlikely.
It doesn't matter how many plays we run. It matters how many point you score. 13 is not enough.
They've got to get this stuff figured out and fixed, pronto, because it's mid-season and the Eagles will be here Sunday. We can't win with an offense that's this ineffective.
Snap the ball
November 03, 2025 at 11:49 am
They held us to basically 3 points. Lucky on the TD call
3 points on 63 plays ……..
Love holds the ball two long on deep shots
They sucker him into those. Triple covered stuff
Where Watson goes he is tripled
I would like to point out on a few plays. Watson was wide open to the north and south end zone Twice. Wide open
Didn’t look his way
LeotisHarris
November 03, 2025 at 01:32 pm
too words... Adderall
Snap the ball
November 03, 2025 at 11:52 am
I do like McManus drama after he missed the field goal. Academy award for him
If your hurt. Don’t kick you cost us a game at home
Make your kicks this week vs the eagles. It’s going to be 28 degrees so figure it out
Snap the ball
November 03, 2025 at 11:52 am
Are we a cold weather team. We will find out
Packers0808
November 03, 2025 at 12:11 pm
30s and 40s isn't cold, -0 to teens is cold.
bjkdad44
November 03, 2025 at 09:32 pm
Na!… babies hate cold weather!!!
Snap the ball
November 03, 2025 at 11:56 am
I hope it’s the same official again that loved tv time with his holding call moves
He would be busy that’s what the eagles o lone does all the time
Snap the ball
November 03, 2025 at 12:01 pm
We are going to have to tackle next week. It’s cold. Need to wrap up. Not bouncing off people
D Covington needs to get middle going….we win. I give game ball to him.
Packers0808
November 03, 2025 at 12:03 pm
Might time to get Mercedes Lewis off the Broncos I believe is where he is of we need A GOOD BLOCKING TIGHT END THAT WE DON'T NEED TO PASS TO VERY OFTEN!
LambeauPlain
November 03, 2025 at 12:18 pm
A bit off topic...but what is the criteria PFF uses to give its "best and worst" scores?
LG Banks, after a whopping 9 plays was graded the highest ranked player on Offense at 86.1. Seems to be a very easy grading system if you don't play many snaps. Talk about a "curve".
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 12:25 pm
It's like batting averages. You've had 8 at bats and you get 3 hits, you're a .375 hitter. If you've had 450 bats, and got 150 hits, you're "only" hitting .333. Which guy would you rather have at the plate?
You have to take PFFs stuff with a big grain of salt. It's a subjective ranking system that they try to dress up as a data based ranking system.
LambeauPlain
November 03, 2025 at 12:40 pm
I thought they had a minimum snap count to qualify for a grade...guess not.
So if an OL player starts the game, has one success on a snap but suffers a stinger on the successful play and sits out the rest of the game...does PFF give that player a grade of 100.0 and label him the best O player?
Probably requires a truck load of salt blocks to accept the PFF ratings. Changes my views on PFF.
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 12:54 pm
Because I didn't have endless hours to grade players, I just used a simple +/- scoring system. If you kept your guy out of the play, it was a plus, and if you didn't, it was a minus. I think PFF has a more elaborate measuring stick, but it's still subjective.
LambeauPlain
November 03, 2025 at 01:24 pm
Yeah, thanks...I don't know PFF criteria either.
I knew it included subjectivity.
But Banks listed as the Packers' top graded player after playing 9 snaps seems odd and not to be viewed as much more than opinions and projection...over actual performance.
Coldworld
November 03, 2025 at 01:43 pm
PFF grades per play forming an average over total snaps however few or many. So he was good in their view but sadly, blink and we missed it. Andy Herman grades in accumulated score, which would better reflect your point on this occasion.
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 12:22 pm
That was about as enjoyable as getting a root canal from a dentist with bad breath.
First, the Kraft injury looks like we're going to lose our best receiver. I'd like to sprinkle fairy dust on this but I'm pretty skeptical that he's going to help us any more this year. The people who have been championing Musgrave are going to get to see him. Here's his chance.
Second, even with Kraft, this did not look like a very good team yesterday, particularly near the end zone. In SEVEN possessions (not six, as erroneously stated), the Packers repeatedly drove the ball down the field and came up with little to show....two FGs, a missed FG, a fumble. And an interception. Finally, a TD to tie.
Third, the defense didn't get a sack. They got some solid hits on Young, and held them to 100 yards passing and an interception. The bigger problem was that we kept getting gashed on the run. More about that later; I just wanted to point out that the defense got some good things done yesterday, despite the yards on the ground and the lack of sacks.
Fourth, one of the strongest teams in the NFC is going to be here in six days, and the Packers are going to have to play a lot better or they're going to be exposed as pretenders, not contenders. Every single player, coach, and front office guys know that this loss should not have happened, and that the damage was largely self-inflicted. Fumbles, interceptions, penalties, etc.
Fifth, I don't see how it's the head coach's fault when a rookie WR catches a ball on a WR screen, runs into the back of his own blocker, and coughs up the ball trying to fight through three tacklers. I mean, did LaFleur draw it up that way? "Here Savion, we're going to throw you the ball, and you're going to run into the back of Doubs, and then fumble it away" That's how he drew it up? That's how they practiced it? Seriously?? I don't see how it's the HC's fault when players don't execute properly. What else is he supposed to do? Yank Williams out of the game and grab his face mask and yell at him? Bench him forever? Have him run laps? What?
Sixth, here's some good news: We're still in first place in the division halfway through. And, we get to play the Eagles, so we're going to find out right away if this team is going to fight or if they're going to lay down and get kicked. If the team comes out against the Eagles and looks like they mean business on offense, then we're going to be right in the thick of it. If we stumble to another 6 point first half, then I'm afraid that this is going to be year of the Love Window down the drain.
LambeauPlain
November 03, 2025 at 12:58 pm
Kraft is done for the season. The Ironman had his knee shredded by his own teammate with Rhyan being blocked to the ground and buckled Tuck's leg and tore the ACL. SMH.
Regarding LaFleur: "...the damage was largely self-inflicted. Fumbles, interceptions, penalties, etc."
It is too easy to blame the players for these recurring miscues during LaFleur's 6 and half seasons. Are those making the miscues held accountable? I know coaching matters. It also seems the O coaches don't experience any accountability I have read or seen. So expect the players don't either. It is all "go with the status quo."
The "we have to do a better job each and every day" and "give 110% effort" and "that was all starts with me" and "I should not have made that call" are wearing thin.
Employees respect what you inspect. And if you don't show interest in accountability for miscues but more of a "one off" occurrence, expect more of them...as we have seen.
jlc1
November 03, 2025 at 12:24 pm
No blame on the D? That run defense against a very poor offensive line was truly awful. No, the Pack lost in all 3 phases.
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 12:33 pm
They had trouble controlling the run when they needed to. I'm not sure how poor that offensive line was. How many Olines in the the league are going to keep Parsons & Co. away from the QB all day. And Dowdle has had some much better games against other teams this year, so somebody is getting blocked. I'm not sure what you base this "poor offensive line" on. They're one of the better rushing teams in the league.
The bottom line, as always, is points. When you hold an opponent to 16 points, and less than 300 yards of total offense, that should be good enough for the win.
On the other hand, 13 points is almost NEVER enough to win, regardless of how many yards, possessions, snaps, etc. your offense has.
Coldworld
November 03, 2025 at 01:48 pm
Another way to look at the significance of the run game is the comparative output. In reality there wasn’t a vast difference. It wasn’t the run D that differentiated the teams in that game.
jlc1
November 03, 2025 at 02:29 pm
Yes points really are the bottom line. But if they don't control the run when they need to the run D is logically not doing the job, just like the offense is not doing its job when they need to, the red zone.
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 02:46 pm
We held them to 16 points and only 265 yards of offense. What else ? Do they have to do it with their shoelaces tied together before it really means something?
They didn't move the ball on us real well, and they didn't score very many points. We should be happy. I, for one, don't think we have to "fix" this unit before the Philadelphia game. I also think that if we really, really really want to do a better job against the run, then we need to play Stackhouse more. Nothing plugs up a run like an enormous guy right where the hole is designed to be.
We just lost 16-13. The problem is obvious. 13 is just not enough.
barutanseijin
November 03, 2025 at 03:00 pm
I think what they really need to do is play better on offense. Score touchdowns, not field goals, get ahead, make the other guys pass. That’s what the GB defense is built for, but the offense is not doing its part.
Strat
November 03, 2025 at 01:10 pm
Going all the way where? For cryin' out loud, stop already with the ridiculous "Super Bowl" BS, the "Loaded with talent" BS, the "Great QB" BS, the "Great coach" BS. Lose the "Youngest team" BS excuse too.
I'm not going to forget what McManus did last year, but his injury situation made it all to easy for Great Coach MLF to do not just the right thing, but the obvious thing. Nobody knows if Havrisik is the real deal right now, or he's just having a good run and it will come to an end, but he does drive the ball hard and is very accurate up to this point. GCMLF had the perfect opportunity to give him more opportunities to prove himself. Inexcusable big swing and a miss by GCMLF...but that's what Great Coaches do.
Bryce Young, 102 yards, 1 INT. With such ineffective QB play, how the hell does Dowdle still run for 130 yards? You know how.
When they get Reed back, and now have Reed, Watson, Golden, Doubs, it think that's a pretty good group. I may be one of the few that thinks Musgrave can do the job, but we're going to find out whether anyone likes it or not. And I'm not disappointed in Golden at all. I think he's the real deal, maybe a QB that can hit him when he's open. Reminds me of Adams having the drops his first year and several wanting to ship him out. A good QB could make things happen with that group. Kraft is already elite IMO.
The NFL used to be tackle football. I doubt teams are coaching the "stick out one arm, close your eyes and turn your head" tackling technique," but if they are, I'd try something different.
They better still run the ball, but the OL just ain't got it right now.
Banks, Hobbs, man, if there were just real "Do overs" in the NFL. I'd take two mulligans right there.
Secondary is what honest people thought they would be.
Shoot themselves in the foot or get blasted in the face, the result is the same.
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 04:11 pm
'''Secondary is what honest people thought they would be. """
So, honest people thought we could hold a team to 108 yards passing?
Mister Chievous
November 03, 2025 at 01:25 pm
those stupid uniforms cost us Kraft AND the game. they are awful. we have the best uniforms in the league. I just love them. can we stop with the game costumes already? never buy them
PackerBackerAZ
November 03, 2025 at 02:06 pm
The uniforms are all on the NFL not the individual teams. They're worn so the NFL can sell more jerseys.
Leatherhead
November 03, 2025 at 02:50 pm
I never want to see them again.
Gold pants with green and white striping. White Jersey , Green Numbers and lettering, Gold trim. Gold helmet, "G" in White with Green Trim.
Every game we can. We can wear a Green jersey, if necessary. Always Gold pants.
Major Snafu
November 03, 2025 at 02:46 pm
I say we just sit back and watch the games. Its not going to be pretty going forward and anyone who thinks Love will rise to the occasion and lead us on, please dont make me laugh. His play has not improved. What you see is what your getting. He has guys open and he totally missed seeing because his focus is on where is Dobbs or Kraft. The later is fine and works out or did work out.
Love needs 8 yards for a first and panics because of the rush and passes to Dobbs for 5? There were guys wide open and you pass short of the marker just so you dont get flattened.
I bet everyone else will be fet up with him by the end of this season and no playoffs.
Packerpasty
November 03, 2025 at 05:25 pm
you nailed it...zero growth as a QB, not to mention zero growth from a certain HC...
CanPackFan
November 03, 2025 at 03:39 pm
Brutal game. How in the world these coaches couldn't see this as a trap game is beyond belief!? And at home? Our offense looks awful - from weak oline play to disastrous play calling. Our defense can't stop the run. PHI is going to kill us next week. And our STs? They at least are consistent - consistently bad. We are NOT a dominant team by any stretch of the imagination. And we won't be until we get a coaching stzff and senior management with an urgency to win!
bjkdad44
November 03, 2025 at 09:14 pm
“He is a great coach overall, and losing to the Panthers is not the end of the world, but these are issues the head coach absolutely has to get corrected before it loses them a playoff game.”… NA… he’s not!!… if he was a great coach he would have a handle on why his team is ALWAYS FLAT… against teams that are underdogs…!!!