The Most Packers-y Player at Each Position This Year

A warm up exercise to get Mock Draft Monday started. 

The 2026 draft is officially less than a month away, and that means it’s time to kick the pre-draft process into overdrive. 

It’s this time of the year when we as fans begin the process of developing our draft crushes, only to be inevitably let down when the Packers don’t take that player. It’s a natural part of the draft, and an important part of being a 365 day fan of the NFL. For fans of the Green Bay Packers, however, it goes a little bit further. Not only do you have to know the player, but you’ve got to know their *testing. 

This idea has been written about a thousand times by a thousand authors, so keep in mind that I won’t be expanding on the idea of the Packers’ strict adherence to athletic thresholds. Nor is this article an attack or defense of those ideas. Instead, my job today is to work *within those confines to bring *you, dear reader, the most Packers-y of prospects available in the draft. This also means that we are a bit limited in our actual range of prospects, since this was a pretty disappointing year in terms of players actually doing the drills that they are supposed to do while at the combine in Indy… That’s a topic for another day, however. 

I’ll also be working within the most realistic range of prospects available to the Packers, without a first round pick. Would Sonny Styles and Jeremiah Love be Packers types? Yeah, you bet. Will they actually end up as Green Bay Packers? No. This also means that these players aren’t necessarily my favorite prospect at each spot, just the one that I think the Packers will like the most. 

With that in mind, let’s dive in! 

Quarterback: Taylen Green, Arkansas

Green Bay has tons of options should they choose to find their new backup QB in the draft, rather than relying on a proven veteran option, but Taylen Green gets the nod over other options like Cole Payton and Drew Allar. 

Green has, for one thing, the experience. The Packers like a quarterback who has seen *tons of action at the CFB level. Taylen Green is a four year starter at the college level, originally playing for his hometown Boise State Broncos before transferring to Arkansas in 2024, where he operated an efficient offense for an otherwise floundering Razorback program. I’m also betting that Matt LaFleur loved having a more athletic option for the backup quarterback, as a little something extra that a Love-less offense can throw at an opponent. 

Green also hits the height, weight and handsize benchmarks that the Packers emphasize at the position. 

Running Back: Mike Washington Jr, Arkansas

I’ll admit that Mike Washington was not entirely on my radar before his showing at the NFL combine, but it’s hard to ignore a performance like that…

At 6’1, Washington is certainly taller than recent acquisitions would show that the Packers prefer, but his weight seems right in line with their usual flavor (for reference, Josh Jacobs is 5’10 223 lbs, Marshawn Lloyd is 5’’9 220 lb, and Emmanuel Wilson is 5’10 226lbs). 

Running back is also where we will run into our first “testing” benchmark, as historical trends suggest Green Bay loves prospects that can hit 10’0 in the broad jump drill. Washington was able to do that, one of nine prospects to hit that mark at the combine. Washington stands out for his ability to do so with a bit more mass on his frame, however. 

Wide Receiver: Bryce Lance, North Dakota State

Because the Packers have drafted so many wide receivers in recent years, it’s one of the positions that we have the best grasp on. We have ideas on Green Bay’s preferences at height/weight, and everything from the 40 yard dash to the ideal three cone time, and a broad jump metric. 

Bryce Lance out of North Dakota State hits them all. 

With 25 career touchdowns, 2,155 yards and 127 receptions, he also hits the more vague “highly productive in college” metric that Packers front office members have spoken about on numerous occasions. 

The obvious comp for Lance is our very own Christian Watson, and it isn’t unfounded. Watson was an ultra-athletic, highly productive receiver out of NDSU, who paired elite speed with the size to out muscle competition at the NFL level. Well, what if I told you that Lance tested even better than Watson did? Intrigued? If I was the Packers, I sure would be. 

Tight End: Sam Roush, Stanford

From the position that we possibly know the most about the Packers’ preferences, we now move on the position we know the least about. 

The Packers just haven’t taken many tight ends, especially of late. Yes, they drafted Tucker Kraft and Luke Musgrave together in 2023. Other than that, they tend to find these guys in free agency. 

We know damn well that they like them athletic though. Probably over 250 lbs too. Tucker Kraft had a 9.52 RAS coming out of college, and Musgrave had an incredible 9.95. Even Josh WHyle had an 8.98 score. 

Enter Sam Roush, out of Stanford. It’s unfortunate that he chose not to compete in athletic drills, or we might have a more complete view of where he stands. Trust me, the lack of agility testing is about to get *a lot more frustrating over these next positions. 

As it stands however, Roush’s 9.99 RAS stands for itself.  Roush wasn’t incredibly productive in college, having only finished his career with four touchdowns and 1,202 yards, but the potential is certainly there. Another player to keep an eye on here is Dallen Bently from Utah, who was awarded a 9.37 RAS. 

Offensive Tackle: Caleb Tiernan, Northwestern

Caleb Tiernan comes to us from Northwestern, not a marquee program by any stretch but that’s why we scout the player, and not the helmet. Tiernan brings a boatload of playing experience with him, having played at least 500 snaps in every year since 2022. He was a LT in college almost exclusively, where he could fill a major hole as Jordan Morgan’s backup. 

Athletically, the Packers love themselves some big men who can move quickly. Looking back, the shuttle and three cone are big indicators of interest for Green Bay. So, you might be wondering what Tiernan is doing here then, with that big fat 31st percentile score in the shuttle drill. Well, remember how I mentioned the frustrating lack of actual *data this year? Tiernan was one of only *four offensive tackle prospects who ran the shuttle drill this year. The others being Spencer Fano (who will be a top 15 pick), Gennings Dunker (who I think will move inside), and Arkansas’ Fernando Carmona. 

That’s not to say that Tiernan won this prize out of lack of options. I love Tiernan as an NFL prospect, and I think he fits nicely into Green Bay’s recent weight trends. Plus, his explosion and overall RAS are indicative of an extremely high end athlete. I won’t go this far, but I think there could even be a place for congratulating Tiernan for showing the competitive spirit to run the drills in the combine. 

Interior Offensive Line: Brian Parker II, Duke

We’ve got a similar story here with Brian Parker II out of Duke, who will be a convert from tackle to an interior offensive lineman in the NFL. Parker was one of eight iOL to run agility drills in the combine. Parker also has a massive wealth of experience to draw on from his college career as a three year starter. 

Defensive Tackle: Caleb Banks, Florida

Oh boy, am I excited about this one. This is probably my “least likely to actually be there at pick 52” award winner, but Banks is worth every bit of the hype. 

Now that we have hit the defensive side of things, we are going to (mostly) start focusing on the explosion drill side of things. No agility drills? Yeah that’s fine (although I still wish they’d run them anyway). The Packers’ last major DT investment, Devonte Wyatt, didn’t run those drills either. In fact, you might remember that Wyatt’s high end athleticism was a major reason for his selection in the first round that year. He earned it too, with a 9.63 RAS. Banks blows Wyatt out of the water in the vertical/broad jumps, as well as height / weight scores. 

The only reason Banks might be available for the Packers’ second round selection would be his foot injury that cut his 2025 season short. Banks played only three games last season, and was still dealing with it during the testing portion of the pre-draft process. So all that impressive athleticism you see measured up there? He wasn’t even at 100% yet. NFL teams will have to decide at what point Banks will be worth the risk, and for our sake I hope that point comes in the late second round. 

Edge Rusher: Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State

Dani Dennis-Sutton should be a pretty solid option for whatever team ends up drafting him this year. DDS crushes most metrics, but leads a number of *very solid options that the Packers could take this year, including Malachai Lawrence from UCF, and Zion Young from Missouri. 

Dennis-Sutton measures just a smidgen under the 260lb benchmark, but he’ll make up for it with incredible speed and explosion grades from the combine. Despite an underwhelming year for the Penn State program in general, DDS was a solid presence for them along the defensive line. He doesn’t get blown off by blockers in the run game, and finished his entire college career with 25 sacks. 

His breadth of starting experience should be an asset in his pocket, when you consider those first crucial games that Green Bay will be without Micah Parsons. They’ll need the entire pass rush to step up in his absence, and I think DDS has the tools to be some part of that effort right away. Despite all that experience, he’s only 22 years old, leaving him with lots of runway to develop in the NFL long term, which we know the Packers value from the selections of both Lukas Van Ness and Rashan Gary.

Linebacker: Jake Golday, Cincinnati

Jake Golday is such a fun option to consider for the Packers. This actually might have been my hardest decision, as far as deciding who should represent the linebackers in this article. His fellow LBs Anthony Hill Jr and Jacob Rodriguez are extremely solid options that should flourish in the league. 

Out of those three options however, Golday gets the nod. Not only did he have the longest broad jump (the defining athletic trait that Green Bay looks for in its prospects) of the candidates, he did it while being much bigger. Rodriguez is 6’1’ 231, and Hill is 6’2 238. I also love Golday’s feel for coverage, and his (as I’ve been emphasizing all article) wide breadth of starting experience in college football, that means he should be able to contribute in Green Bay right away. 

Defensive Back: Julian Neal, Arkansas

To round it all out, we’ve got another position that we know a lot of what the Packers want. In fact, some of our cornerback knowledge we have directly comes from the mouth of Brian Gutekunst. We know the exact line in height that he looks for: 5’11. We know they want a player over 190 lbs, with a fast 40 (sub 4.6) and a sub 7 second effort in the three cone drill. Well, it’s that last part that will once again do its absolute best to stymie this effort of ours today. 

Out of all the cornerbacks who participated in the forty yard dash in this year’s combine, not a single one failed to pass the Packers 40 yard dash benchmark. Every single one ran a 4.6 or better time! That’s incredible! That should leave the Packers with an embarrassment of options, right? 

Well…

Of that same list of players who ran in the combine, only three participated in the three cone drill. Not a single one managed to pass that threshold. D’Angelo Ponds ran a 7.2, TJ Hall ran a 7.19, and Julian Neal rang in a 7.19. That changed at Neal’s pro day, however, as he managed to improve his time to 6.9 second score that you see above. Neal’s ability to improve that score and competing in order to do so is extremely impressive to me. He’s definitely one to watch, and he becomes our third Arkansas Razorback on this list. 

Conclusion 

There’s no easy answer to the lack of testing data we as fans are forced to wade through this year. It’s worth mentioning that this doesn’t really affect actual NFL teams. If they want that information, they’ll get that information. Be it through private workouts, GPS data, ect. But for us fans, sorting through what little data we have is a labor of love. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns!

__________________________

 

0 points
 

Comments (39)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
TKWorldWide's picture

March 30, 2026 at 07:02 am

A well executed exercise. I look forward to seeing if GB strictly adheres to these guidelines, or does “good at football” enter the picture?

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 30, 2026 at 10:01 am

Pretty naive to think the "good at football" isn't the primary. Outstanding athlete is the norm in the NFL. Would love to see this list of players who are good at football who are bad athletes.

0 points
0
0
Kevin Carpenter's picture

March 30, 2026 at 10:16 am

We're not asking for someone with a 3.5 RAS to come in and save us. We're just tired of "athletes" being drafted, specifically in the first round, way above where they were projected to be drafted. Quay Walker, Eric Stokes, LVN, when better, more proven football players were right there for the taking and probably should've been drafted in stead.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 30, 2026 at 11:51 am

Mike Mamula started this whole thing.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

March 30, 2026 at 12:00 pm

That's not the implication here, that's just you assuming it is because you disagree or just like to be difficult because you can't help yourself. If there is a 9.45 RAS guy, with great production for two straight years, he is way ahead of the game. We are talking about the guy who runs really fast in his underwear who had only 2 sacks in the only year they started. You see the difference? It isn't a matter of being anti athlete, that's just stupid. RAS should just be one of many metrics, It's not a cheat code. But I would rather have a guy who started 3 years, played in a tough conference, with great production who has a RAS of 7.4 - 8.0, then a guy with a RAS of 9.2 - 9.6 who did basically nothing in college and started one year. Especially in round 1-3. If you want a high RAS project in 4-7, go for it.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 30, 2026 at 07:41 am

It's kind of cruel to inflame Packer fans with RAS scores on a Monday morning. I get it though, these are all interesting prospects.

For what it's worth, Ryan Grant, who was one of the better Packer running backs in recent years, was 6' 1" and listed at 222 pounds, so virtually identical to the RB in this article.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:00 am

A good OL can make an average back look like a pro bowler. Start with the OL. Packers need to stock behind the starters to beat injuries and to give themselves freedom to move players w/ big contracts out and younger, cheaper, and better in. The depth chart is pretty poor right now.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:19 am

I am hoping for an IOL prospect that is so good, he either pushes or replaces one of the penciled in guys. And history shows he can be selected on day 2 or 3.
I also think Gennings Dunker has a killer mullet, FWIW.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:20 am

Agreed. Washington is projected as a 2nd or 3rd round pick, and there are other positions that are much more in need of being addressed in those rounds. But the article is not about needs, it is about which prospect at each position seems like the kind of player who might appeal most to the Packers. Washington seems to fit the bill.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 30, 2026 at 09:06 am

Washington is a very poor pass protector technically and possibly in terms of willingness (as a cause of lack of leverage). He’s not just not polished, he’s bad at it compared to most RBs entering the draft. He’s also had ten fumbles over 3 seasons—ball security is an issue with him. In RAS terms alone, maybe he’s a Packer type, but in terms of getting play time, he’s almost certainly not one.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 30, 2026 at 09:50 am

A great runner who has ball security issues and is not a good blocker. Sounds like Marshawn Lloyd, who they took in the 3rd round. I doubt they would draft an RB that high this year, though.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 30, 2026 at 10:06 am

Ball security yes, pass pro not so much. While I’m not saying that was Lloyd’s selling point, as he needed work to refine it, he was more accomplished at it than Washington has shown himself to be.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:20 am

Grant was fantastic! I remember back then the “thing” was to find a “one cut and go” runner.

Is that still a thing?

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 30, 2026 at 09:52 am

James Starks comes to mind too as a larger back whose 4.5 speed was greatly aided by his quickness and one cut style.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:05 am

So basically, you just logged into PFF and looked at the top 2-3 RAS scores at each position, narrowed it down to height and weight and how they historically fit in with GB picks, then wrote an article. I think the GB way should be about production when they draft. RAS scores are just one measurement of many. On it's own, it's a dumb metric and a lazy way to judge talent. There are many variables to consider when trying to project college talent into the NFL. Placing all your eggs into the RAS basket is short sighted and begging to fill your team with high ceiling guys with extremely low floors. They become projects who rely heavily on coaching and discipline to fully realize their protentional. Green Bay doesn't need projects at every position, they need men who have reps, high floors, and who just roll up their sleeves and get to work. Finding these players takes a lot more effort than looking at 40 times on a spreadsheet. The "Green Bay way" of drafting hasn't been profound in any meaningful way. Much of our real production has come from free agents and trades. Have we forgotten that just a couple months ago, people in mass, were calling for MLF's and Gutes head? Now, we are to just fall in line and embrace fun catch phrases like the Green Bay way? What would Gute do? RAS - give me a break.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 30, 2026 at 10:06 am

Who on earth thinks that Green Bay exclusively evaluates talent by these metrics. Testing might matter in projection of future returns, but it's foolish to think that Green Bay is passing up great football players because of a one-day track meet.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

March 30, 2026 at 11:14 am

The author of this article seems to subscribe to this as being the main method for GB to draft. He would not have written the article otherwise. But hey, thanks for chiming in Sir. :)

0 points
0
0
Kalani Jones's picture

March 30, 2026 at 12:19 pm

You are completely wrong, Sir. From the beginning of the article: “ This idea has been written about a thousand times by a thousand authors, so keep in mind that I won’t be expanding on the idea of the Packers’ strict adherence to athletic thresholds. Nor is this article an attack or defense of those ideas.”

I have positive and negative views on the Packers obsession with these ideas, but as I wrote, that was not my job today. I’ve written or spoken into a microphone about that at least five times over the last few months. The idea that I think the Packers would only draft with this idea in mind is laughable. Have a good day.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

March 30, 2026 at 12:59 pm

With all due respect, this is not how it reads to me. The title of your article is very clear. "The Most Packers-y Player at Each Position This Year". Then you follow it up by posting a gold mine of high RAS players and explain them away as a Packers-y kind of player. How would you read that if someone else posted you article word for word? Completely wrong? No. It completely reads as someone writing an article that fits a certain kind of player into the perceived Packers draft criteria. It is what it is. Whether you personally agree with that philosophy, I don't know and I don't care. You, like anyone else has a right to believe what you want. But to claim this piece you wrote wasn't trying to fit certain players that fit certain metrics into a perceived methodology of how GB drafts, is completely disingenuous. Since you feel the need to engage, you tell me how you hoped your article was supposed to come across. I mean, if you are claiming that I am "completely" wrong, perhaps you could tell me where, Sir? I never said You thought this way. I said this article on its own merit reads that way. Forgive me, I'm not familiar with your microphone speaking, so I have to take your writing at face value. You shouldn't assume I am following you around hanging onto every word you say. ;)

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:49 pm

he just told you otherwise. also too, he didn't write it for you, he wrote for people that can read nuance.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:42 am

First off, I do think we should value actual playing experience and progression made in multiple years of starting, as much as RAS scores. No 1-year wonders for me with the first 4 picks and playing against major competition should be valued more.

The big question to be asked in the Packers draft is what they do at #52, do they stay there and pick or trade back because we are in dire need of draft capitol. I value CB as the biggest need because we have ignored it since drafting Stokes. Because of that I usually look to trade back for extra picks since #52 is the most valuable asset we hold.

Since I don't subscribe to the "just draft the BPA everytime" method, I look to fill our biggest needs with our earliest picks so as to get the best players at those needy positions. When doing mocks, I sometimes just pick at our scheduled picks and surprisingly got Neal, Dennis Sutton, and Roush off your list who I would be very happy with in the first 4 rounds. Most of these players on your list are Top 75 players so we will only have realistic shots at 2 of them. I wish we had 2027's picks right now because we could make some hay.

It will be interesting to see what happens with Caleb Banks and his foot injuries. He is a gamewrecker when healthy but some teams will back off from him because of the uncertainty. I don't see GB taking a chance but some team will spend a 2nd or early 3rd. If I pick a DT with our 2nd or 3rd its usually Darrell Jackson who is similar to Banks. But because I see CB and Edge as being more likely we could get a starter there early, DT get pushed to late for players like Demonte Capehart, Xzavian Harris, Devin Eastern, or Aaron Graves.

DT could very easily get pushed to 2027 if we have confidence in signing A FA. Calais Campbell? Make a deal with him now to sign him after the draft to save the comp. Clowney too.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

March 30, 2026 at 03:50 pm

Of course there are other factors besides the RAS but all things being equal The RAS is the most valuable tool in the box. It all goes into the pot for the final assessment. There is a fine art to drafting. Everyone has their hit's and misses.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:59 pm

While it's a tool in the toolbox the metrics are absolutely secondary to actual scouting. Other than that, yes 100% drafting is not math - it's an art.

The RAS numbers provide the basement GM with something they can wrap their brains around, otherwise they're left with dope-ass talking haircuts like Mel Kiper telling them who is good, because there are 180 odd players getting selected out of a pool of 1200 or so.

It kills me that people are so naive as to believe that those RAS numbers are the driver.

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

March 30, 2026 at 09:40 am

Maybe for the second time in quite a few years, (last year it happened), I think Green Bay will select a player or two to fill in their weakest position on their first pick and that being CB.
I don't have my scout pipeline anymore so all I'm doing is looking at the prospects and determining strengths verses weakness. I think Green Bay will select a CB on their first pick. I also think they may select a CB on their third pick as well. In between probably a DT, Edge, or OT. It's not because Green Bay is looking exclusively at CBs for their third pick, its because that is where there will be some quality players that can contribute in their first year.
I liked the article, and yeah RAS scores are important, but they don't tell you everything about the player. Three guys I like for the Packers that would be drafted in the later rounds:
Adam Randall-RB 6-2, 230#s. Used to play WR and position switch to RB. needs lots of work in pass blocking and instinctiveness in running the ball. Could be a bust or starter if he works at it.

Dan Villari-TE 6-4, 237#s. Used to play QB at Syracuse. Best route runner in TE class. Has run after catch ability due to being a dual threat QB. Light and needs to improve blocking ability. Great hands as well.

Logan Taylor, OG 6-6, 308#s. Over 9 RAS score, and performed well in Senior Bowl against Caleb Banks and Nick Barnett. Reminds me a little of Zach Tom in ability.

JMHO

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

March 30, 2026 at 02:36 pm

I like Randall as well Hands. He is a bigger RB, I read 6'3 240, kind of a poor mans Derrick Henry-Ravens. He is also fast, like 4.5 for that large of a man, The WR angle is also intrigueing, so he has great hands and some route running ability. I would hate to be a DB taking this guy head on. Because it was his first year as a RB, he has really fresh legs compared to other RBs. And lastly he won't cost an early pick, projected 6th round or later.

Logan Taylor is a good one too, he plays OT/OG. Versatility. I will add Trey Zuhn for the same reason. He was All-SEC playing LT, OG, & Center @ Texas A& M. Draft those 2 and it's like getting 5 players for 2 picks. Neither will get picked before the 5th round and GB should be all over them.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 30, 2026 at 07:59 pm

I'm disappointed in lack of bench press done by prospects. You want a football player? Seems like a significant gauge to me.

0 points
0
0
MooPack's picture

March 30, 2026 at 09:59 am

My favs @ positions of biggest need:
(Iheanachor, Pregnon, Hunter and Johnson will most likely be gone, but I've been able to get them more than a few times in Sims)

OT
Max Iheanachor
Jude Bowry
JC Davis

OG
Emmanuel Pregnon
Keylan Rutledge
Jalen Farmer
Jeremiah Wright

OC
Jake Slaughter
Brian Parker

DT
Lee Hunter
Domonique Orange
Darrell Jackson

CB
Chris Johnson
Daylen Everette
Julian Neal
Will Lee

...and a few 7th round or UFDA's (UDFA)
WR/Ret
Kaden Wetjen

QB
Mark Gronowski

K
Drew Stevens

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

March 30, 2026 at 01:58 pm

You must be a Hawkeye fan picking Gronowski and Stevens.

I agree 1000% on Everette too, he could start in GB in 2027, but would contribute in 2026. Pick him @ #120

For OL I would add Trey Zuhn-Texas A&M, All SEC playing LT, OG, & Center last year. It's like drafting 3 players with 1 pick. Also Logan Taylor-Boston College-OT/OG. Versatility!!

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

March 30, 2026 at 10:04 am

Not going to get too interested in the pre-draft hype and analysis. I used to. I now have more fun just following the Packers during the draft days. Then do the follow up on the new Packers after being picked.

Read a comment on another site that Josh Sweat is staying with the Cardinals? Seems they paid him his roster bonus upping the ante for moving him. He requested a trade earlier and is close to Gannon. Couldn't find any reported confirmation of this. Anyone know?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

March 30, 2026 at 10:12 am

The option bonus of 7.2 million appears to have been due on March 20th. Absent any news of a contract renegotiation, it would appear it’s been paid as he remains a Cardinal.

0 points
0
0
Swisch's picture

March 30, 2026 at 11:36 am

What about Wicks and Van Ness for Sweat and a 5th-round pick in the 2026 draft?
I'm not saying we should do it, just putting it out there for consideration.
If not Sweat, is there another vet out there at a position of need we might want to trade for?
The thing is, no matter how well Gute drafts this year at interior defensive lineman or cornerback or whatever, they probably won't be difference makers for a couple of years.
If our window for the Super Bowl is maybe only a couple of years, we may want to get a difference maker for right now like Sweat.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

March 30, 2026 at 08:02 pm

Lose 3 pass rushers and get rid of another - great idea 👍

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

March 30, 2026 at 02:08 pm

Hey Lambeau, That is good news for GB. Sweat would have been a solid pickup but was more expensive than we could afford this year anyway. The Banks and Hobbs signings hurt us there too. Plus we would have had to trade Reed or picks that we don't have enough of.

I also just read this and it's interesting. A J Epenesa will not sign with the Browns because of something in the medicals, it didn't say he failed the physical, but they had 2nd thoughts. I was disappointed that in a year we need Edge help and we are cash strapped, that GB didn't seem interested in Epenesa as a cheap option. He signed for $2 million plus incentives that could get him to $5 million. GB should at least explore Epenesa and if he is indeed healthy, he had no prior injury history in Buffalo, offer him a vet minimum contract with incentives that doesn't cost a comp pick. He would be solid cheap insurance that has multiple year starting experience for the Bills.

0 points
0
0
GreenandBold's picture

March 30, 2026 at 11:29 am

What does Packersy even refer to ? If I’m thinking of a Packers type of player in the draft I think of soft , injury prone and lacks physicality if Gute is picking Offensive Lineman . If he’s picking defense it’s soft , injury prone , lacks physicality and can’t tackle . That sums it up .

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

March 30, 2026 at 11:41 am

Actually that doesn't even make sense.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

March 30, 2026 at 11:36 am

So I took your list and used Draft TEK
And Pff current ratings.

Taylor Green. TEK 120PFF 246 No
Mike Washington. TEK 65 Pff 71 No
Bryce Lance. TEK 94. PFF 62. Yes - Then trade Reed
Sam Roush Te TeK 110 Pff 87. No
Caleb Tiernan. OT Northwestern. TEK 74. PFF 64 No
Brian Parker Ot /C Duke. TEK 109. Pff 126. Yes
Caleb Banks Dt. Tek 47. Pff 32 Trade up NO
Dani Dennis Sutton. Edge Penn st. TEk 50. PFF 67. Yes- But steelers will move in front
Jake Holiday. LB Cinn. TEK 56. PFF 59. No
Julian Neal. CB Ark. 97. Pff 172. No

Stukes Cb PFF 61. Yes. - Need
Landon Robinson Dt Pff 122. Yes - Need

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

March 30, 2026 at 02:14 pm

Stock, I saw an article that had Dani Dennis-Sutton as a projected 4th round pick. I think he is a 2nd or 3rd at the latest, and I think he could start in GB next year with all the holes we have in our Edge group.

Roush would be an upgrade over Musgrave, so a big yes for him.

Stukes has alot of injury history. Just like Caleb Banks. Pass

I think you are in the minority for Landon Robinson, just too small. And didn't really play against any good competition.

0 points
0
0
WD's picture

March 30, 2026 at 01:47 pm

Does anyone for one second believe that Jordan Love will not miss a single game the entire season? If Taylen Green is there he would be my pick. He would be the best replacement for dual threat Malik as backup QB.
By the way just who is our backup QB?

At the combine no one else was even close to Green. It is not like he is only a runner either. He threw for over 300 yards a game several times. He is without question the best dual threat QB in the draft (per ESPN) He alone would add big rushing yards to an average at best running game. The Packers have really underestimated the loss of Malik . Expect Malik to shine in sunny Florida with the Dolphins. Love will shine too but we need a backup who can win.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker61's picture

March 31, 2026 at 07:01 am

WD, I just don't get the fascination some people have with drafting a QB every year. This all came up before last years draft when someone said GB needs to get back to drafting and developing QBs. I get that years ago we drafted, developed and traded some QBs. Right now we have a solid backup QB in Desmond Ridder. He was a Top 5 QB in the 2022 draft and can do almost everything well, except win consistently, HE WILL NOW. Drafted in 3rd round, he had to start too early, bad team, Atlanta gets rid of him and are still searching for a QB today. Tua is the flavor of the month.

QB. Kyle McCord, our practice squad QB, was a 5-star recruit at Ohio State. They had 3 that year and McCord lost the competition to C J Stroud, but won the starting QB job in 2023 and threw for over 3000 yards. He transferred to Syracuse, threw for over 4700 yards, 34 TDs 12 Ints. A fabulous year and was a Top 10 QB in the 2025 draft, but should have been Top 3. He is everything a team would want as a QB, we have him already.

So what is the goal behind drafting another young QB when we already have 2 who will already be better than anyone we draft. McCord is arguably better than any QB in this draft other than Mendoza. To everyone who wants GB to use one of it's "only" 7 picks on a QB, why not spend the pick on a position of need instead? We don't need a young QB, we have 3 of them now, all with great potential.

0 points
0
0