Should Matt LaFluer be on the Hot Seat?
From his latest Packers Daily chat, Aaron reacts to a Packers fan asking if head coach Matt LaFleur should be feeling the heat....
By PackerAaron
From his latest Packers Daily chat, Aaron reacts to a Packers fan asking if head coach Matt LaFleur should be feeling the heat....
By PackerAaron
Comments (39)
rstain99
January 07, 2025 at 05:37 am
Not sure keep thinking him as a young coach learning the ropes, then realize been here few years. 5plus? Still can't manage clock still blows timeouts and teams still make mistakes that a veteran coach should not allow. So maybe time to lead him toward the seat a bit, at least how him he is not free of blame. Like the defense this year as a whole, you just have to be in middle to upper part of league. A great defense covers up for average offenses. Seems like they need to find more football players rather than fat cats, Rasual Douglas was a football player no question traded wrong guy, seems like Cooper is a player, Tucker Kraft is a star in the making. Jordan Love is very talented no question is he the guy to take team to SB? Eagles are going to be very tough at home in the cold, not sure GB team as a whole is a cold weather team. They looked a little out of place vs Bears. Maybe good things will happen Sequan is all rested up yikes!
Tundraboy
January 07, 2025 at 11:45 am
"Sequan is all rested up yikes!"
But that is also when he is most prone to fumbling, overconfidence ,etc.
Hell, after last two weeks, GPG. Lead the way Cooper and perhaps drag Kenny and others along with you in your wake!
Houndog
January 07, 2025 at 07:22 am
"Should Matt LaFluer be on the Hot Seat"?
Yes!
His play calling became MORE questionable this year, more Vanilla, and even with the addition of Jacobs the offense regressed. The 'Illusion' is not that of complexity, its an illusion of competency.
Yes!
Six years, three defensive coordinators, and he has yet to recognize the middle of the field is NOT a fucking fairway. Does this guy NOT watch film? How many times can you get your ass beat the same way without making a change?
Yes!
Six years, and I have yet to see one player develop as a bonafide team leader that can rally the troops, what does that say about 'their' leader?
Put him on the bus with Murphy, and Gutey!
Packerpasty
January 07, 2025 at 10:03 am
yes, especially for your last part, which ive stated before, he doesnt "grow" anyone into a better player...Love is worse or the same this year as last...plus MLF doesnt put together a great staff like they have in Detroit or Minny or other places, he hires buddies and college guys...
DragonSilk
January 07, 2025 at 07:38 am
Yes, he certainly has a lot of improving to do. I think the spotlight and pressure of being The Guy is getting to him a little bit. Gutey has gathered too much talent for it to be wasted. Just as disappointing to me is Hafley. Why do our DC's start out looking great then slowly fade to mediocrity or worse? His play calling on that last Bears drive was pathetic. You have to wonder if he knew the score. Even the lousy Bears coach had to be thinking, "Wow are they really just giving us the winning field goal? The Packers defenders had to be wondering what the hell are we doing.
stockholder
January 07, 2025 at 07:49 am
No-
The key is matching up.!!
You want another 3 years for Gute.
Then they'll fire MLF.
We've had nothing but a revolving door with Gute.
And now more injuries.
But how did everyone's talent get better than GB. ?
I say we're headed for the 80s, thanks be to Gute.
With Murphy leaving. Don't make changes now.
Gute's seat should be hot instead.
Oppy
January 07, 2025 at 08:02 am
Everyone's talent got better than GB's because we spent the first 4 years of MLF keeping aging vets at the expense of investing in youth.
It cost the Packers in future cap space and limited our ability to acquire young, top tier FAs. It kept young talent off the field. It delayed the inevitable rebuild. In short, it was a wasted span of 4 years trying to chase "one more run" instead of allowing the GM to do what's in the long term best interests of the Packers.. and it was all under the insistence of Aaron Rodgers.
Gutekunst has only had the last 3 seasons to really start to rebuild the roster and get the cap back in order. He of course hasn't hit on all the picks, but nobody does.
When it comes to your take, let's not forget that Ted Thompson and the Transition to Aaron Rodgers was blasted by you as heading back to the 80's as well. It's safe to say you have a problem with change and have zero ability to see potential outcomes of the future. You simply recoil from change.
stockholder
January 07, 2025 at 09:58 am
He kicked the can down the road.
And the eagles picked before us.
Yet everyone is saying we Don't match up.
Just stop making excuses for Gute.
He hasn't stop building the secondary since he's got here.
Oppy
January 08, 2025 at 01:02 pm
I'm curious as to when you think Gutekunst "got here"
Bitternotsour
January 08, 2025 at 01:15 pm
You might also ask "where do babies come from"
NJ-RICK
January 07, 2025 at 07:26 pm
Thank You, my feeling exactly get rid of GUTE....
Coldworld
January 07, 2025 at 08:03 am
Forget about the man for a moment and look at the results over this season in terms of tactics, play calling and overall standards of disciple and effectiveness.
Then look at the reasons behind the outcomes of the 6 seasons LaFleur has been our head coach: who was playing and why we fell at whichever hurdle.
Do that and there’s very little genius and a lot of foreseeable and repeated issues. There is little evidence of elevating the various rosters. Yet still. For some reason we hear the refrain of youth and upside.
This season to me showed quite clearly that, despite now being the 7th longest tenured HC now, we have not progressed and in fact LaFleur may actually have been figured out. Losing 6 out of 6 tactical battles in divisional games is a pretty damning feat. More so for a man touted as a play calling savant.
Some blame the rosters (I have a hard time with that over most of his tenure). Even were that true, poor rosters can be disciplined and focused. Ours never became so. Nor did it ever really play a single complete game except against a totally neutered Saints. More an unusually big mismatch in my view: the inconsistencies returned immediately after.
After 6 seasons I can not point to one game where LaFleur seems to have dragged a roster beyond its potential, decoded and beaten a nemesis opponent over multiple games in a season or simply left us wondering how he and we pulled off an against the odds victory. I can think of a number of the opposite outcome. At least 4 ending seasons
This year, at least 2 coaches in our division have drawn more from their rosters and proved more adept one on one twice as well. Those are Head Coaches that aren’t going anywhere soon. That’s our reality. They currently have LaFleur’s number.
For all the above reasons I can not but see LaFleur as a myth Murphy created. There no tangible substance over 6 seasons, no upward curve in terms of tactics and consistency that supports that belief. He’s not a neophyte, he is one of the longest tenured coaches now.
Not only that, I’ve not seen his defenders identify any clear basis for their mantras beyond the wins. Wins are part coach and part roster and he’s had some pretty good ones. The best part of that he had a newly re-motivated future hall of Fame QB determined in a swan song . If that’s all there is, there is nothing but hope without substance.
Absent a sustained miracle, I’m forced to conclude that LaFleur is a media creation who never really existed and that his era had run its course, the only question being how long it will take for those in Lambeau to face up to it.
Packerpasty
January 07, 2025 at 10:07 am
These coaches who were once called young geniuses and see how tarnished they are becoming, McVay, MLF, the dude in Miami, their star is fading...the worst part is MLF does not bring out the best in players especially his QB who is trending toward mediocrity....
Bitternotsour
January 08, 2025 at 12:42 pm
McVay? Love trending toward mediocrity? Surely you jest. Try harder. Troll better. Your material is so stale.
mnbadger
January 07, 2025 at 10:09 am
Thank you CW, spot on.
Sad reality.
MLF can win games with a really good roster but he has not shown an ability to lead nor adjust based on opponent.
When you're standing still, it's easy to get pased up in this hyper-competitive league.
GPG!
Tundraboy
January 09, 2025 at 08:35 pm
My words exactly. Agree and thank you and CW. Only situation where I felt he delivered was last year Dallas. Sadly it's more than that. There have been just way too many moments like last week that are just again, sad.
It's at a point where the players have learned more and progressed more as young as they are, than their leader. That's unacceptable in any universe.
White92
January 09, 2025 at 08:25 pm
Very well put Coldworld
mjbrogno
January 07, 2025 at 08:28 am
If , and I mean, if MLF is let go, who is out there ??? Sunday’s game was horrific with his clock management. Coupled that with the Halfey’s brain dead d alignment on 3rd and 15 and we’re talking about s##T canning the coaching staff. If the Pack gets manhandled in the playoffs this could become a reality.
JamesKnell
January 07, 2025 at 10:50 am
The gold standard for bad clock management was reached by the Bear's ex-coach Matt Eberflus. The Packers had the whole game to make plays and win. They didn't.
Everybody wants to be the Chiefs. Everybody remembers 2010-11. But the defense is better this year. There are some guys who look like "difference makers". The WRs and TEs have been specular at times. But they are beat up... they have taken a lot of shots to get us this far. The defense has improved from last year and they are young.
I love the Packers. I want them to win. But some years it make sense to take some emotional chips off the table and let things play out. If you don't have another hobby get one. In the mean time go out and help your friends have a good time.
Sophomore slumps are so common in professional sports they are a cliche. We have a lot of sophomores and that really shows.
If that's not enough for you, if you don't remember the post-Lombardi Packers review those seasons. Watch some fuzzy games on youtube. Remember, the Packers are 251-151-2 since the year 2000 and the 1990s where pretty good too. If that's not good enough for you, perhaps you should just be a Bill Belichick fan or Andy Reid fan. But we will always have Vince.
13TimeChamps
January 07, 2025 at 11:12 am
Be careful. That kind of positivity and reasoned thinking could get you tarred and feathered on these threads.
mnbadger
January 07, 2025 at 03:13 pm
If we're going to be content with 10 - 11 wins/season, keep mlf until he retires. He'd likely be the winningest coach in history.
If he can't manage a game better, never, ever will his team win a superbowl.
IMO - he's Matt Eberflus with a better haircut, roster and collection of coaching clichés.
GPG!
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2025 at 12:09 pm
MLF "managing games better" is not the way to skin this cat. Division of labor is. Delegate! Have MLF do what he's good at, but stop trying to have him do everything. When clock management and coach's challenge is crucial, playcalling is still essential and getting the right personnel groups on the field is still necessary. It's not reasonable to expect MLF to get all that done in time.
Learning that he's no longer in control of the running game but has passed that off to Steno is not really surprising, the two seem disjointed rather than seamless. Plenty to work on but duplicating the Bear's strategy of firing somebody every time something goes wrong does not lead to winning football.
mnbadger
January 09, 2025 at 06:15 pm
" . . . firing somebody every time something goes wrong" - mlf has been here 6 years.
Continues to fail at challenges, timeouts, clock management, in game adjustments and motivation.
Just to name a few areas in critical need of improvement.
Basic bullet points of a head football coach at any level.
Ray Rhodes was fired after 1 year with a winning record proving that wins and losses aren't enough to hold your HC position.
MLF is not a top ten HC IMO.
I for one think the GBPkrs should be able to get a top flight head coach.
GPG!
JamesKnell
January 12, 2025 at 10:35 pm
I'm sure there are many Belichicks here waiting for the job to open up, lol. They are everywhere these days.
EnemyTerritory
January 07, 2025 at 09:12 am
IMHO it’s a year too early to be on the hot seat. I think that the volume has been turned up based on overly high expectations for this season based largely on beating the Cowboys in the wildcard round last year. Going into last year the team was expected to be rebuilding and not really supposed to make the playoffs but Love got hot and Jones got healthy and voila, Super Bowl or bust in 24/25…
The team is flawed. Its defense is missing a pass rush and lockdown corner,partly due to injuries and partly due to some missed drafting and bad assumptions by the front office. Frankly the WRs didn’t really progress as much as expected also but is it reasonable to expect all the draft picks to hit at a single position in consecutive years? A comment above mentioned the transition from aging vets under the mushroom wonder delaying the rebuild… don’t forget the 66m dead money. The Lions do not have that albatross nor do the Vikings. Both teams also have had the ability to pick in the top half of the draft for many years.
That being said this team seems to lack an identity. Is it a running tea or a passing team? Why not use the Tight end more? Kraft has the potential to be special. The indecisiveness and some boneheaded calls and time management gaffes are red flags.
So I think MLF gets another year and 2026 is hot seat time
mnbadger
January 07, 2025 at 10:11 am
I'd suggest it's a year too late.
Another wasted opportunity.
GPG!
SicSemperTyrannis
January 07, 2025 at 10:37 am
MLF needs to delegate clock management and coach's challenges. Keep his nose in the playbook, it's what he's good at.
Elevating the roster, #8 & 25 can combine their intensity and infect the locker room with it
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2025 at 12:20 pm
#85 and 88 both on the field at the same time is a completely unknown quantity. I said last season that TE needs to become a bigger part of this offense. Another commenter pointed out GB's formula and of course he's been proven to be right, but I consider that stubbornness and stupidity. Our offensive playmakers are, in order of effectiveness, #8 85 & 11. With 88 recovering from injury.
What do you do when your WRs as a position group suffer from a case of the drops? Insisting on retaining the same formula of ball distribution is not a winning strategy. Becoming one dimensional and just running all the time isn't, either. Get the ball to your playmakers, and let them make plays. Right now that means going to your TEs more frequently. That was also necessary the last two games.
This isn't even in-game adjustment, adjusting week to week should be substantially easier.
Getting all the WRs on the same page with JL10 can still happen, but counting on that Sunday? Heavy sets and jumbo packages make a lot more sense.
Tundraboy
January 09, 2025 at 08:38 pm
The pitch forks may be out before 2026.
hanayclan
January 07, 2025 at 09:22 am
Thank you, Aaron, for your reasoned response. That’s all.
JamesKnell
January 07, 2025 at 10:14 am
If you want the Packers to be more like the Bears, then yes fire the coach every three or four years. To really be the Bears follow this simple formula.
Year One: Hire new Head Coach.
Year Two: Use high draft pick on QB
Year Three: Fire Offensive Coordinator
Year Four: Fire General Manager
Or just use a d4 and roll the reaction to anything short of a Super Bowl victory.
Don't forget to react to all loses by sputtering about "accountability" and acting like "a very stable genius".
Congratulations! At least 80% of NFL teams follow your strategy. None of them are the Chiefs, Eagles, or Steelers.
Alternatively, if the Packers have a disappointing season, form a group of other disappointment fans. Buy a giant wedge of cheddar and roll it into an active volcano. Don't forget to record it for youtube.
Lphill
January 07, 2025 at 10:41 am
I don't think he is a good fit anymore , no killer instinct, late to make adjustments , but whose out there?
mnbadger
January 10, 2025 at 10:40 am
Who's out there is the real question.
M Vrabel?
GPG!
jimtalkbox
January 07, 2025 at 11:41 am
I can appreciate that Gutey is trying to quickly move onto a "post Rodgers era" Packers but this season has been frustrating. There isn't a single game we can point to in 2024 where we can say "Yes, this was a complete game against a quality opponent!"
Watching division rivals climb to the top of the NFC in a span of 2 years with journey-man QB's while we "try to find our way" with the league's youngest (and one of the most inconsistent) teams isn't a "fun watch" for Packers fans used to dominating the division year in and year out.
2025 will be the 3rd year for the Jordan Love era and will likely be its most telling. Are we going to catch the Lions and Vikings or are we destined to remain the 3rd best team in the North? If it's the latter, it's certainly not good enough and Gutey/Lafleur may need to tweak their approach. If they're adamant about not changing their approach while yielding mediocre results, then you CERTAINLY have to look at making changes.
pacman
January 07, 2025 at 08:11 pm
Sorry I missed the initial posting of this page. Probably to late to even get many eyes on this now but here's my 2 cents. Thanks to the site for giving members a chance to directly discuss this.
1. I never called for Gute to be fired. As far as drafts go, someone could put together some stats on how his picks match up with the rest of the league GMs.
2. MLF is a different story. I don't know if most of Nagler's video was addressing Gute and purposely not MLF or that's just his few minutes on the general topic. But the complaints against MLF are fairly welll documented - even at the end of the video, Nagler points out that this weeks loss was directly due to coaching mistakes. This is not the first time. How many times have we seen the Packers come out flat - even for a whole game. Remember 'burn the tape'? How many times has this site discussed that the Packers can't seem to play a full 60 minutes of solid football? How many times has MLF been called out for not being able to adjust more quickly. And lastly, just as they talk about developing and growing and building apply to coaches too - how does that fit in the the Joe Barry hire/fire? He was a bad hire and 3 years was at least 1 too long to fire. So we don't always let things play out for a decade. All of this is on MLF.
So MLF has a good record. True enough. But how much of that is that he indeed has had good players and does currently as well. Most new coaches come in to dumpster fires. He inherited AR with SB potential day 1. But he has not shown the ability build this team beyond their natural talents. Certainly that's a very subjective statement but having the same issues over and over again is some solid evidence. And this year things have gotten out of hand. And JL is not on a good run to save the team like last year. If you have a good team and beat the teams that you are supposed to, that doesn't make you a good coach. It makes you a mediocre coach. How long do you keep a mediocre coach around before putting him on the hot seat?
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2025 at 12:27 pm
Losing against the Bears is the only indicator of being a bad team this season. Good teams don't lose games they're supposed to win.
MLF has been consistently outcoached in big games, they just don't come along very often so it doesn't show up on a weekly basis. The needed adjustments are fairly obvious, the question is if MLF is willing to do that.
SicSemperTyrannis
January 08, 2025 at 11:55 am
I still see reasons for optimism all over the field! Talented players. as well as actual stars being created in front of our eyes. I have less confidence that they'll deliver 60 minutes of great football this Sunday, as they haven't done that yet this season. Of course it's still possible.
Please MLF, delegate clock management and coach's challenges, keep your nose in the playbook.. Somebody has to do all that but it doesn't need to all be done by the same person. Balancing the run game with passing and keeping the opposing defense on its heels is probably THE main "area of emphasis" that's needed ...
Since'61
January 08, 2025 at 01:17 pm
If the Packers play badly against the Eagles and lose then I think that MLF should be on the hot seat for the 2025 season. 3 bad losses to end the season is not a good look for a coach who IMO has a good roster. Having said that I have posted during this season that I think 2025 will the year that it all comes together for the Packers. Love will be in his 3rd season as the starting QB, Jacobs will be back, the OL, WRs and TEs will all have another year of experience behind them.
The defense has some holes to fill but between a good draft and a salary cap with room to add some solid FAs the Packers should overcome this season's roster depth and have a more complete roster than this season.
We can't remain uncompetitive in our own division and we can't remain uncompetitive against the better teams in the league. If that happens again it will just another season of treading water until playoff elimination if the Packers get that far. At some point MLF, Gute or both need to pay the price for not getting the team to the next level.
As for the upcoming Philly game I fully realize that the Packers can play a good game and still lose or for that matter they can poorly and win. Of course winning in that case would require the Eagles to play even worse or make mistakes at critical points in the game similar to the Packers against the Bears last week.
In the event of a PACKERS victory we'll just have to wait and see how much further they go in the playoffs. Thanks, Since '61
Starrbrite
January 08, 2025 at 05:14 pm
Excellent comments ‘61.