Redskins Film Review: Spread Offense Spread Too Thin

The Packers used more empty back sets and fewer sets with two or more running backs than they had all season. They also had arguably their worst offensive performance of the season.

Taking a look inside the Xs & Os, personnel and schemes after watching video of the Packers 13-16 loss to the Washington Redskins on Sunday...

Offense

  • Quarterback Aaron Rodgers seemed to have gotten his wish to spread out the offense and get more multiple-receiver sets on the field against the Redskins. However, it only resulted in 13 points, the fewest points scored in a game since by the Packers since December of 2007. The Packers used a season-high 14 plays with empty-back sets. The only other time they had over 10 plays with no running back this season was against the Chicago Bears, a game they also lost. For comparison's sake, they used no-back sets far less often in their wins against the Lions (3), Bills (6) and Eagles (3).
  • The Packers also employed sets with 2 or more running backs a season-low 14 times. By comparison they used sets with 2 or more running backs more often in every other game including the Lions (18), Bears (17), Bills (20) and Eagles (25).
  • That being said, on the six plays in which the Packers used 7 or more blockers in pass protection, Rodgers completed only 2 of those 6 passes.
  • Four sacks were given up by the offense, the the offensive line protect Aaron Rodger very effectively for three and half quarters. The first two sacks were probably best described as coverage sacks. It wasn't until Bryan Bulaga gave up a sack late in the fourth quarter and Chad Clifton one in overtime that the offensive line really didn't hold up its end of the bargain.
  • Josh Sitton, the best run blocker on the team, was responsible for the 4-yard loss by Brandon Jackson on second-and-1 from the 1-yard line in the first quarter. Sitton tried to cut block Phillip Daniels; Daniels jumped right over him and made the tackle.
  • It's hard to blame Mike McCarthy for not reviewing the early second quarter pass to Jordy Nelson along the sideline in which he may or may not have gotten into the endzone. Nelson was so close to the sideline that even watching the game on a large-screen, high-definition television, there may have not been enough evidence to overturn the call. In fact, it's possible they even could have lost yards on the spot of the football.
  • Shame on Aaron Rodgers for not running out of bounds on his late fourth quarter scramble while trying to set up a game-winning field goal attempt. He only got to the Packers' own 44-yard line, still far short of field goal range. By getting out of bounds, he would have preserved the Packers' only timeout remaining.
  • Was using John Kuhn the wisest use of personnel when he motioned out of the backfield on a third-quarter play on third-and-2? Rodgers threw to Kuhn for a 1-yard gain, still one yard short of the first down marker. Seems like Brandon Jackson's speed compared to Kuhn's could have made that 1-yard difference.
  • McCarthy claimed run/pass option plays took away some rushing attempts from Brandon Jackson. I only counted three run/pass option plays, thereby in theory only taking away three potential carries from Jackson.

Defense

  • Nobody in the defensive backfield is quite the blitzer that Charles Woodson is. Pat Lee blitzed on pass plays nine times and caused very little damage. Same thing last week with Jarrett Bush. It may take the return of Sam Shields or Al Harris until the Packers are confident enough to use Woodson in the slot again.
  • The defense was in the base 3-4 a season-high 21 times on Sunday. They were in the nickel 56 times, used the 4-defensive lineman "Hippo" formation twice and used the "Prevent" defense on the Hail Mary at the end of regulation, which included Jarrett Bush, Brandon Underwood and Derrick Martin.
  • Cullen Jenkins has performed more than admirably with his club-like cast, but I can't help but wonder if there were a few instances in which he may have been able to bring down Donovan McNabb had he not had that cast.
  • Mike Neal dropped into coverage once just before halftime with the Redskins having a first-and-10 at the Packers' 13-yard line. Neal forced McNabb to overshoot his intended target, Anthony Armstrong, in the end zone.
  • Charles Woodson's penalties are starting to become costly. One penalty on Sunday wiped out a sack by Clay Matthews, another put the Redskins in much closer field goal range for the game-winning kick in overtime. He had a third illegal contact penalty that was rather ticky-tack, but that wasn't the one that was costly.

Special Teams

  • On the Packers' third punt of the game, Derrick Martin inexplicably picked up the ball off the bounce at the 25-yard line instead of letting it roll. The ball's momentum was carrying it toward the Redskins' endzone could have gotten another five yard or so had Martin left it alone.
  • Mason Crosby had a perfectly placed second half kickoff pinned along the sideline. Jarrett Bush and Maurice Simpkins had the opportunity to force the Redskins' return man out of bounds but couldn't.
  • Tim Masthay also had a perfectly placed 46-yard punt along the left sideline. Neither Bush, Martin nor Pat Lee could force Redskins return man Brandon Banks out of bounds. He returned the ball for 30 yards.
  • Dimitri Nance lost contain on a 17-yard return midway through the fourth quarter instead of forcing the returner back to the middle of the field toward his help.
0 points
 

Comments (28)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Andy Crain's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:15 pm

When Martin picked up the punt off the bounce, he thought a Redskin had touched it. You can see him point at a Redskin player and trying to convince the ref that the ball was touched.

0 points
0
0
zub_a_dub's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:16 pm

You brought up the biggest point that was missed, A-rod not running out of bounds but sliding in bounds on that last drive costing the Pack a time out.

What was A-rod thinking? That cost the Pack the game, would have given the Pack another play to get closer for the winning field goal.

0 points
0
0
hyperRevue's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:18 pm

He had a concussion?

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:21 pm

'cost the pack the game'.

He got the first down on an individual effort and followed up with a 17 yard connection on a hot read to a rookie. Rodgers effort put them in a position to win in regulation.

Fail to see how to see he lost them the game when it's his effort with only 1 minute left giving them the opportunity. A mistake, yes.

0 points
0
0
hyperRevue's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:22 pm

I don't know if it cost them the game, in and of itself. But it definitely made their task a lot more challenging. Going out of bounds would have saved a TO and about 10-15 seconds.

0 points
0
0
hyperRevue's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:23 pm

And, really, same kick another 2-3 yards closer is a good kick.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:26 pm

Pure hypothetical. You have no idea how he strikes that ball on a different opportunity.

To say that play, that one play cost the Packers the game is silly. Would it have improved their position, possibly. You're also assuming the next play wouldn't have gotten him killed.

0 points
0
0
hyperRevue's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:27 pm

Oh, of course. That's why I said "same kick." I was just pointing out how close it was to being good. Winning and losing came down to a few inches.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:28 pm

"winning and losing came down to a few inches."

I don't see any reason to drag Favre into this.

0 points
0
0
hyperRevue's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:29 pm

haha!

Comment of the week. Please lock the thread, Aaron.

0 points
0
0
zub_a_dub's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:39 pm

one more play and an additional 10 seconds on the clock makes 2 more plays to get closer for that game winning field goal.

Its a % game, closer you are the more likely you are to make the field goal.

First downs are not as important as time outs and seconds on the clock when you are playing all 4 downs in the last minute of a game.

What made it worse is that A-rod nor MM new what to do after that play, they wasted time trying to spike the ball, then called a time out anyways.

If A-rod new what he was doing he would called as time out while he was sliding.

Poor play all around, if you make the decision not to got out of bounds, then you better know what to do.

0 points
0
0
fish's picture

October 11, 2010 at 05:42 pm

Looked like McCarthy had zero faith in there Special Teams/Defense and didn't want the Redskins to get the ball back. Rodgers stays/slides inbounds letting the clock run, then lets the clock run way down before they hike and spike the ball. Like they were sure the Redskins would return the punt if given the ball back with enough time left.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:19 pm

Thanks, Brian.

On the plus side, this draft class has some potential studs.

Rookie defensive lineman ussually struggle more than any other rookies entering the league, Neal looks like a beast now.

Bulaga is only 21 and, technically, he's sound in pass pro and physical in the run game.

Quarless is smooth and athletic. I like how he responded since I believe he's seeing action about 5 weeks too soon.

Like Zombo and Sheilds. The rest need development and reps.

0 points
0
0
zub_a_dub's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:42 pm

I would include the play of Bishop, he out played Hawk that game. We may have found an ILB, early to tell, but a good start.

0 points
0
0
Shootz's picture

October 11, 2010 at 06:28 pm

Excellent, it looks like my plan to change Bishop's calendars to say 'August' all year round is working.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

October 11, 2010 at 07:50 pm

Bishop is pretty far removed from this draft class.

0 points
0
0
zub_a_dub's picture

October 11, 2010 at 04:43 pm

DEFENSE did not lose the game, does not matter who went down to injury on defense, Capers did his part and held the Redskins to 13 points in 4 quarters of play.

If our Offense, lead by MM’s play calling, can’t score more than 13 points in 4 quarters, we lose.

Again the offensive INT gave up the field position in overtime to win the game, not the defense totally blowing it

0 points
0
0
fish's picture

October 11, 2010 at 05:49 pm

"If our Offense, lead by MM’s play calling, can’t score more than 13 points in 4 quarters, we lose."

Or..., If you put up 10 points in the first quarter, and "AGAIN", don't play a complete full game and put up 3 points in the second quarter, there going to lose.

0 points
0
0
fish's picture

October 11, 2010 at 06:05 pm

Correction, Half, Not Quarter. Oops!

0 points
0
0
Jersey Al's picture

October 11, 2010 at 05:48 pm

"McCarthy claimed run/pass option plays took away some rushing attempts from Brandon Jackson. I only counted three run/pass option plays"

Brian, just out of curiosity, what criteria are you using to determine if a play was a run/pass option?

0 points
0
0
Brian Carriveau's picture

October 11, 2010 at 05:56 pm

As far as run/pass option plays I only count the plays that were passes. All I have to do is watch the offensive linemen. It's easy to pick up when they all run/block and then Rodgers throws a pass.

I obviously have no clue that when there's a pass option but the team chooses to run the ball anyway.

0 points
0
0
Jersey Al's picture

October 13, 2010 at 12:04 pm

Ok, that's what I thought... Thanks.

0 points
0
0
fish's picture

October 11, 2010 at 06:12 pm

I usually look for 4 wide and no Fullback in the lineup. There's no need for a Run Blocker if you plan on receiving the ball after the defensive line.

0 points
0
0
KurtMc's picture

October 11, 2010 at 07:32 pm

Isn't MM's choice to go for the TD (a low % call) vs kicking a high % FG the play of the game? On the road, never take points off the board.

Also, his play calling to even score. 2 runs up the gut? Stupid & unimaginable.

0 points
0
0
Ryeguy812's picture

October 12, 2010 at 08:56 am

Surprising that more isn't being made about our clock management at the end of the game. Sure Rodgers' not going out of bounds was part of that, but we also had about 15 seconds and 1 timeout left when we got to fieldgoal range and we let the clock go down to 7 seconds instead of trying to maybe get a little closer with one more quick pass or something.
Reminded me very much of the MN game two years ago when Rodgers led them down, got into range but not really close enough and Crosby pushed it again from 50+

0 points
0
0
thepretzelhead's picture

October 12, 2010 at 11:47 am

Hooks.

Does anyone know if the Packer practice uprights are extremely narrow? No reason not to practie with narow posts. Gould does that for Chicago and the guy is money. Crosby is strong and wild...let's face it.

0 points
0
0
Morli's picture

October 12, 2010 at 02:59 pm

Is there any explanation what so ever, why GJ85 keeps on struggling?

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

October 12, 2010 at 03:08 pm

When teams sit back with two deep safeties it takes away a lot of what the Packers like to do with Jennings. They run him on a lot of 15 yard "In" and comeback plays which just aren't going to be there when you have man under/two deep.

Now this said, McCarthy needs to start getting Jennings the ball from the slot, esp on the short and intermediate slant as well as the deep 9 or "Go" route. He can split those safeties, but McCarthy is probably reluctant to have him take the shots Finely does when he goes down the middle.

0 points
0
0