#PackersDaily: Pass catchers wanted

Utah tight end Dalton Kincaid is being connected to the Packers quite a bit by the Draft Industrial Complex. While taking him at 15 would be a surprise, the Packers definitely need to add pass catchers in this draft.

Listen to the podcast here:

Find all of my daily podcasts here.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

7 points
 

Comments (108)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
NJ-RICK's picture

April 05, 2023 at 03:17 pm

Like they didn't need pass catchers last season. To little to late Aaron. Packer MGT has this team going backwards. Sad...

-7 points
7
14
PackerAaron's picture

April 05, 2023 at 03:51 pm

Lol

3 points
6
3
packer132's picture

April 05, 2023 at 05:21 pm

Management has the team going backwards? Have you watched the Packers the last few years or even at all? McCarthy had 6 wins in 2018. With a rookie coach, the team won 13 games in 2019. They did it again in 2020 and 2021. Last year was disappointing but most PACKERS fans are excited for this season. Jordan Love running the plays that are called and rookies on defense should be better. I don't know if I would draft a TE in the 1st round, but I am not a pro scout. GB should add 2 WR's, 2 TE's, 2 CB's, 2 edge rushers. I can't wait for the season to start.

4 points
8
4
Packerpasty's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:00 am

tired of this "running the plays that are called" bullshit...thats only because he wont know how to read defenses good enough to change out of something that wont work....give it a break, AR didn't change every single play..to some he only changed into the plays that didn't work...funny stuff...and if the team does go backward in the division a whole bunch of people will be on here to say "told ya so"....

-2 points
1
3
Coldworld's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:43 pm

We are going to be able to see what it looks like without him. No need to speculate therefore. We will be able to see what the dynamic is when it’s LaFleur and a new starter who won’t be changing much.

I do wonder how our WRs would look to us today if we’d traded Rodgers last year, let Cobb go and not signed Watkins and let Doubs, Watson, Lazard, Toure and Rodgers/Melton get targets from Love. Essentially I suppose we will find out plus a few draft picks. At TE, well, we need one.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:33 pm

A lot of those guys missed time with injuries. Uninjured, and as second year men, I'd suppose Doubs and Watson will combine for well over 100 receptions this year.

0 points
0
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:07 am

They literally drafted 3 receivers last year and kept the 2 tight ends Rodgers specifically wanted to keep. And they drafted Deguara 3 years ago, who has actually done some nice things when given opportunity (usually by Jordan Love), but he doesnt get enough opportunities. I'll give you one guess why. Drafted Amari Rodgers too and then he immediately had the rug pulled out from underneath him when you-know-who demanded they trade for Randall Cobb. And yet were still blaming the front office? They've had their hands tied behind their backs trying to keep Rodgers and his ego happy, which is impossible.

4 points
5
1
Untylu1968's picture

April 06, 2023 at 10:07 am

100 👍 for you!!

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:10 pm

If Amari was better, he would have beat out a guy ten years older than him. He was a stiff and incompetent as a punt returner, a position where young guys with Wham skills make a mark. The apologies and conspiracy stories need to be swept out with yesterday's dust.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 06, 2023 at 01:00 pm

As a returner, he proved his lack of worth. As a WR, not so much due to never being used in the slot really. I readily agree that he didn’t look like the man I’d have given the first chance to, but we really pretty much left the slot to Cobb and Lazard in terms of snaps and willingness to target, and were pretty ineffective there. If I had more faith in LaFleur (or if you believe that, Rodgers) then perhaps Amari could have helped. I’d still have gone with Toure, personally.

I suppose Amari Rodgers could still get the chance to prove us wrong as a WR. He did catch 12 of 17 targets for 154 yards with the Texans, 12.8 yards per reception and at a 70% catch rate over 6 games . Cobb caught 38 of 48 for 417 yards over 10 games at 12.3 yards per reception and with a 68% catch rate. I’d say that ought to at least raise some questions, about reliance on and production from both.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 05, 2023 at 03:33 pm

F YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Aaron, imagine the impact of both Kincaid and Washington in this offense, with Watson, Doubs & Jones or Dillon?

Whoooooah, BABY!!! Bring it! Who the AF are they going to cover???!!!!

LOL

-1 points
5
6
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:36 am

Interesting how I am seeing Dalton falling to late round 1 on the internet. I am also seeing Musgrave climb to early 20's in round 1 on some mock drafts. Hmmmm!

I really like Washington and certainly would not complain if the Packers took him, but I have thought all along like Dobber that he is a stiff route runner who is limited. If he isn't there at #45 maybe you draft a blocking TE like Durham later in the draft. In the meantime, you select a Kincaid, Musgrave, or a Kuntz as the move TE. Zach Kuntz, Tucker or LaPorta if available in round 3 would be good picks. Otherwise, Gutey just drafts Myers for a combo TE and be done with it until late in the draft.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:02 am

Seriously, Knock, don't believe any of that garbage...

DIC moves players all over the place for engagement, specifically targeting draft enthusiasts, and more so, those who ride the simulator games. That's what they are. Games. There's no reality to it.

16.2 ypc is nothing to sneeze at. Plus, they used a move TE opposite Washington. Brock Bowers had 63 receptions to Washington's 28. They were used differently. If Washington had Bowers touches, he'd have gone for over 1000 yds. Bowers went off for 942, 15 ypc. Washington had 454 in less than half the opportunities.

Would be nice to have more advanced stats on these cats.

1 points
2
1
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 06, 2023 at 11:23 am

I do like him and would certainly take him in the 40's of round 2. However, he would be long gone by early round 2. One would have to package picks to move up and get him, but where late first round? Early 2nd round?

-1 points
0
1
ShivaJim's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:34 pm

I don't know what the peanut gallery is complaining about, but I had the same thoughts, only Washington before Kincaid.

-1 points
0
1
PatrickGB's picture

April 05, 2023 at 05:14 pm

Other than the big names, I don’t know squat about draft picks. I respect those who do!

0 points
1
1
StarrtoRodgers's picture

April 05, 2023 at 09:47 pm

Neither does anyone else on this site - they haven't watched these players play at any length, they just know what they read, which is passed around and around.

The best condensed info is the 1) NFL combine results when it comes to physical skills and 2) college game statistics and performance in games against national top #25 competition when it comes to on field performance.

-4 points
1
5
Tundraboy's picture

April 05, 2023 at 10:17 pm

I dunno. Then there's players like Tebow. Finding who will be an NFL football player is a full time job one none of us are capable of. We alI have seen a lot of great college players on national champion teams turn out to be duds while someone from the smallest of schools and lower tier of competition become HOF players.

4 points
4
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 05, 2023 at 10:34 pm

There's a lot of stuff I don't know, can't know, and will never know. But one thing I can, and do, know is history, and the Packers history strongly suggests we aren't going to take an offensive player at #15.

You are correct that stuff just gets passed around.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:30 am

"we aren't going to take an offensive player at #15."

Unless it's a QB--and if a QB sits on top of the Packers' board at 15, they likely trade out--or an OT, I agree.

Imagine the sheer volume of brain that would need to be mopped off the walls if the Packers took a QB at 15...

"There's a lot of stuff I don't know, can't know, and will never know."

I've been highly critical of the DIC. I come back to the fact that the majority of draftniks are just compilers...they use the posted info from other draftniks to build their reviews. Some watch film, and many of those guys are focused solely on the top 75 or so prospects...some are even decent at breaking down film. Few do their mocks based on scheme fit, true needs, or team tendencies. I laugh at a lot of their projections.

Overall, they mostly are creating an outlet to sell a product, so they need to "differentiate" to get people to look at them and come back. What does that mean for their rankings? It's in their interest to shit on any team or GM that doesn't follow their mocks and projections because they're protecting a product.

In the end, I think I'm like most people here in that I watch a non-trivial amount of a limited selection of college football. I don't talk very much about rankings or draft suggestions for that reason. I sit squarely on the fact that most GMs and personnel guys have had their boards in place since before the combine and most movement since that point has been due to changes on their rosters due to FA (prioritizing within groups of similar players due to need) and through interviews---and not through combine numbers. Most GMs will attest to that. This late-riser and late-faller stuff is largely draftnik schputz to promote and keep us buying their product.

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:47 am

Exactly. Player movements on big boards are for the most part, laughable.

They move players up and down for engagement and revenue.

That’s why I’ve never hit a simulator, and why I hold to 4 time tested resources for info. Athlon. Ourlads. The Sporting News. PFF for raw data, not grades.

Athlon is #1 in my book, and it’s published well before the Combine. Oddly enough, they get more right than many. I believe they’re more closely aligned with the best NFL boards. Ourlads is nearly equal in quality.

1 points
2
1
TKWorldWide's picture

April 06, 2023 at 11:01 am

👍 for the use of “schputz”!

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:15 pm

Every now and then, you just gotta kvetch.

1 points
1
0
mrtundra's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:18 am

If I were you, I'd order and then read, THE CHTV Draft Guide! They have several sports-minded staff who know what they are talking about in writing the analyses of the college players going into the draft. A real deal and so very helpful in having you gain an understanding of the draft process and what kinds of players Green Bay Packers' management is looking for, in trying to improve the team!

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:21 am

I agree: my feeling has always been that Al's staff watch a lot of film and have a good feel for what the Packers' tendencies are and how players fit.

2 points
3
1
TKWorldWide's picture

April 06, 2023 at 11:03 am

Last year’s CHTV Draft Guide had a kid named Watson as the #2 receiver available.

2 points
2
0
ShivaJim's picture

April 05, 2023 at 06:23 pm

I prefer Washington over Kincaid. Washington is a monster football player, would certainly would help the run game, and runs over people when he gets the ball. I think Kinkaid is an injury risk early in his career, and not as much a blocker. I don't think they go early on wide receivers as their RASs and 40 times seem slow, except for the fast little gadget guys. I think Devonte Hyatt is a great compromise, and his playing speed seems even faster than 4.4 and his RAS is 9.5. Otherwise, they go with big wide outs later with Tillman or Perry.

-2 points
1
3
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:20 am

As I watch more on Washington, I think for the first year or maybe two, he doesn't provide much more than Marcedes Lewis did. He looks heavy-footed to me in how he plays, and I wonder more than a little how he's going to uncover against safeties and quick coverage LBs. He might grow into an outstanding pass catcher, but I think there's more projection there than I'm comfortable with at 15.

I agree: I think Tillman is the kind of physical WR the Packers would covet...the question will be price point.

2 points
2
0
OrganLeroy's picture

April 06, 2023 at 02:42 pm

There's no one in this draft named Davante Hyatt.

1 points
1
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:58 am

Maybe recalibrate this.....Devonte Hyatt!

I have said it before while Jalin is a good player I just do not see him as the WR type the Packers need since they already have Watson. Jalin is rather slight and is more of a straight line speed (4.4) & finesse guy. Lazard is now gone and I believe the Packers in addition to a good TE needs a big physical WR who can make the catch in traffic. A WR the QB can get the ball out quickly to on blitzes for those contested catches, and who can high point throws. A good blocking WR. Jalin is none of this! A guy like Quentin Johnston, a Cedric Tillman, or a Johnathan Mingo type of WR. You could probably even add guys like Andrei Iosivas, Hutchinson, or Dontavian Wicks.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 05, 2023 at 09:23 pm

Hard pass on Kincaid unless he drops to the third rd. His team mate at Utah is better.

-2 points
2
4
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:34 am

Kincaid is a jumbo WR....less "TE" than Tonyan.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:20 pm

Danish today...

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 01:23 pm

I prefer a good Kringle! ;)

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 02:39 pm

From Racine

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:46 pm

Precisely my point.

SLOT.

Do we feel better taking a Smurf like Addison? Is he 175 lbs? I like Addison, but I’m afraid he’ll break. JSN Hammy hits when? And, there’s not a ton of quality at WR outside R1. Some, not a ton. I know there’s a lot of R2/3/4 WRs I don’t like.

I mean, who cares, as long as he’s a really good, dynamic WR. Kincaid has size and a resume. A true move.

1 points
1
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 07, 2023 at 08:59 am

So in agreement GG!

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:13 am

Welp. I'm new to the "Small Fracture In His Back" party.

I pass. That's too high to allow for a whiff, even the possibility of a whiff. Wow.

I mean, I'm having reservations on Jaxon Smith-Njigba and his hamstring. Was it mild and he just wanted to protect his draft stock? Did it take a year to heal?

Sorry, Knock. I don't like for the Packers to take injured players, nor those with extensive injury histories.

0 points
0
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 07, 2023 at 09:54 am

GG,
I knew about Dalton having a back injury. No idea what type of injury, or how serious. If it is anything of any significance I too would say forget it. Back injuries are too big an unknown. I trust the Packers should they draft Kincaid will do a thorough medical analysis. If healthy he would be a godsend for the offense. If not him, someone like Musgrave, or maybe even Zach Kuntz late round 2, or round 3? Might Kincaid's injury push him to #45?

I'm still holding to my Bijan thoughts if he was available he would be a great slot WR in 2023, combined with playing RB to spell AJ. I like thinking out of the box and finding a way to take a potential superstar game changing player and fit him, however creatively into the Packers offense. I don't see how Gutey & ML can overlook how the team could use him providing him a ton of touches even with AJ around, Zay Flowers would be another fantastic slot WR with similar talents but just without the RB pedigree.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:04 am

I’m 175 too. Maybe that’s what kept me from getting drafted.

Oh, and the whole football thing.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 05, 2023 at 10:31 pm

As our season wound to an end, I really thought that nothing would improve the offense more than a TE who could give us 6 catches for 60 yards each game.....but who could also get his man blocked, because that's his first job. On most plays, he's a blocker. He blocks on the runs, he blocks on the dump offs to the RB, he blocks on the quick WR screens. Sometimes, we put two TEs on the field and they BOTH block. So it's a blocking position, first and foremost, and a receiving position second.

And that's why I've come to decide we'd be ahead taking a Day 3 TE, like Kunst or Schoonmaker, and using these premium picks to enhance the arsenal. If we get the Jets #43, that would give us #15, #43, #45, #66, and #78.

Get a starting RT. He will make everybody else on the offense better and he'll make our O-line depth better if he's good enough to put Nijman and Tom on the bench. Get a big, physical WR....I've liked Tillman, but if he's gone at #45 then we'd have to go to Plan B. And get another horse for the backfield, because that's 50% of the offense, Jones and/or Dillon can get hurt, and in 2024 they could both be gone.

3 of the top 45. That 3 out of the top 23 offensive players. That's 3 of the top 19 non-QB offensive players.
And out of that group we can get a starting RT and two good weapons. That's a win. IMO.

0 points
3
3
marpag1's picture

April 06, 2023 at 01:21 am

" 6 catches for 60 yards each game.....but who could also get his man blocked, because that's his first job."

Wow. So that projects to 102 receptions for 1020 yards on the year, which is more catches and also more yards than any TE in the league last year except for Travis Kelce, and the player would accomplish this despite the fact that "on most plays, he's a blocker." And you plan to acquire this gentleman on Day 3.

Good luck to you, sir!

Me, I'm thinking of nabbing a 20-sack EDGE guy as an undrafted free agent. I really think that might be the spark this defense needs.

6 points
6
0
NickPerry's picture

April 06, 2023 at 04:13 am

LOL...Now that was funny! Thanks marpag1

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 04:45 am

It really was.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 06, 2023 at 01:09 pm

Yeah, I know that was an extreme example, but that's what people clamor for here. They want Kelce, or a Kelce type, even though that's not our offense, it's never been our offense, and it's not going to be our offense in 2023.

I think if you re-read that, Marpag, you'll see that all I'm wanting on Day 3 is a guy who can get his man blocked and maybe catch a pass or two, because that's our offense. Why spend a premium pick on this position?

-2 points
0
2
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 05:05 am

76
54
662
4

You’re misunderstanding me here. Most Packer fans watched another team win the Super Bowl again. The impact of high quality, dynamic TE - use - was not lost on any of them, including myself.

KC’s use of 12 personnel, with 2 TEs and 1 RB, was taken to new levels in 2022.

Kelce is essentially a big WR. Above, you’ll see his numbers when used from the SLOT: 76 Targets. 54 Receptions. 662 Yards. 4 TDs.

12 personnel requires 2 TEs. One of those should be a dynamic playmaker as a move TE in the mold of Kelce.

The Packers have ZERO starting caliber TEs.

We lost our blocking TE in Big Dog.

We lost our “move” TE in Bobby. He did his best to emulate Kelce (19 TDs 2020) before his ACL.

Want a dynamic playmaker at TE?

Yeah, so do roughly 20 other teams. How many big playmakers at TE exist in this draft?

Want a dynamic move TE who will create mismatches, move the chains, and help you score? Well, then you have to take one, and by 42, the best are gone.

Might want to take 2 early. Blocker. Slot. Washington. Kincaid.

1. Don’t give AR away for less than #13
2. Take your TEs
3. Spend your next 10+ picks addressing other need areas.

**** Look where talents project in a draft.

This draft isn’t a grocery store with loaded shelves.

4. FFS, take your best Safety next. R2-R3. After that, good luck.

* Remember, this draft is loaded at EDGE, CB, WR, OT. All of those positions and DT can be addressed later with great talents. Same cannot be said for TE and S.

3 points
4
1
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:47 am

People lose track of the fact that Kelce is actually a really GOOD blocker...matter of fact, that was his hook coming out of Cinci: a good blocking TE who's coming into his own as a pass catcher. Just because KC calls runs at one of the lowest clips in the league, we don't see it so much.

The guy is uber competitive...that's a trait that I would argue we don't see emphasized enough in drafting. "Want it" should be a key component in any profile.

"Same cannot be said for TE and S."

I agree on S in that there's not a Kyle Hamilton, but this draft aligns well with combo TEs at the top of the draft. I think that's a good thing for the Packers.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:34 am

There are 3 “combos,” in Mayer, Washington and Schoonmaker.

I guess my bigger point is get both, in-line and move - the best of the best while you can. Agree there are a lot of move TEs.

Washington is a one of a kind prospect, and I’d tap him first without hesitation.

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:44 am

Based on my limited work, Schoonmaker has Packers written all over him. Like Tucker Kraft, too. I could see them go after Zack Kuntz later on.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:11 am

Oh, I agree. I might like Kraft better than Schoonmaker. Kraft has more production.

For all we know, Gutekunst drops WR Quentin Johnston and S Brian Branch straight down the slippy slide into Green Bay.

I wouldn't have a problem with that either. Taking Schoonmaker R3 would be big though, if he's still there. Kraft is another late Day 2 favorite.

What I like about Kincaid is he's a freak as a receiver. He's the active FBS leader amongst TEs with 2,484 yds and 35 TDs. He had receiving averages of 19 ypc in 2019, on 44 rec for 835 yds and 8 TDs.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:26 pm

Kincaid will be lacking in blocking prowess. He was used off the slot. Watched Kraft dominate in the open field, the past couple seasons. He can work the Seams and get the YAC.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:23 pm

I would Target Kraft and Schoonmaker. Happy...Happy.

-1 points
1
2
Tundraboy's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:32 pm

I'd like all three.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:22 pm

The New Offenses are driven by Two-TE sets.

-1 points
1
2
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:35 pm

Agreed. 12 AND 13 personnel.

0 points
0
0
Johnblood27's picture

April 06, 2023 at 06:28 am

Thats a solid post LH.

Mix in a couple of safetys and DL and it could be a draft for the ages.

0 points
1
1
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:16 am

Yes. A good 5-Tech can be had R2-R5. But, Safety? Best to load in there R2-R3, or we will miss our chance.

EDGE is very deep. Maybe add one R2, another R4.

I think Slaton & Ford in his year 2 will hold down the NT fort nicely. Add a 3-Tech late with a flyer.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:28 pm

CBs before safety.

0 points
1
1
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 06:59 am

Lest we forget, when Ron Wolf got serious and knew he had a gun slinger, he brought Keith Jackson & Mark Chmura to Green Bay.

Love Gun. Adding both Washington & Kincaid now might be a very smart play. The mismatches for opposing defenses would be insane.

0 points
2
2
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:14 am

Not to be a nooge, but Chmura was drafted (sixth round, so not likely a high-end target) while Don Majkowski was still the starter in GB.

It doesn't change the fact that he was a very productive pass-catching TE in college and for the Packers, though.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:44 am

I knew that was coming while writing that… and sent it anyway. LOL

I’ve posted studies on where to find starting TEs here. None of that is lost on me. I brought Schoonmaker into these discussions. Yeah, I get it. He provides value, but nothing close to Washington as a blocking TE. Nobody in this class comes close. As a receiver Darnell averages 16.2 ypc. That’s nuts.

That was a different era too, and it took Chmura 5 years to become the factor at TE that he was to help win Super Bowl XXXI.

My Sleeper: TE Mason Fairchild

We need 2 TEs, and I’d prefer one of them to be a field stretcher, chain mover, capable of starting. The other, a blocker, capable of starting. I think Washington + Kincaid would be explosive adds to today’s Packers Offense. Both instant contributors.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

April 06, 2023 at 01:18 pm

Fairchild is slow in terms of long speed. He’s also not a very impressive blocker for a guy his size. A bit high cut. Needs some weight room time. He’s good in pass pro though. That said, I still like him as a short yardage contested catch chain moving TE with the ability to improve his blocking. He’s got really good hands and he wins in contact. The kid can really high point. He had fairly quick feet too. He ought to be able to get a few after catch yards with that suddenness and wiggle.

I actually like Fairchild as an option in the 7th to develop as a workhorse hard yards TE. He’s not going to break many long plays, but I think he gets plenty of first downs.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 01:56 pm

Yeah, he's probably late R7 or UDFA target for development.

How many 6-5. 261 burners do you know?

Have you seen him? The guy is huge. The majority of his snaps were in-line (529), with 62 from the slot and 46 as an H-back. Kansas ranked 9th in the nation in 3rd down conversions, and Devin Neal was a 1000 yd rusher. That doesn't happen without good blocking.

Plenty to develop though. Team Captain. I don't know where you're getting your info, but the kid can block. Zero career sacks & just 1 pressure in pass pro, his teammates say he can make any block, and I've seen it myself. Former HS National High Jump Champion. Great athlete.

144.2 QB rating when targeted.

Creative runner after catch. Elusive. Thrived on physicality. Contested catch specialist. Extremely competitive. High points. Big catch radius. Has a knack for digging out low throws.

His game took a big jump, pardon the pun, last year when HC Lance Leipold took over.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:09 am

Yes! As I recall, Chmura was drafted as a 230 lb receiving tight end. Lived in the weight room, took his…
“vitamins”…and later emerged as a 250 lb dual threat. Big, strong, and willing to block while maintaining his receiving skills. Then when GB added Keith Jackson, they had a great combo at tight end.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:54 am

It's been repeated over and over again that this offense wants to be deceptive out of its sets: well, there's nothing deceptive about an undersized OT lining up in-line on 40% of your snaps (ahem, Marcedes Lewis), and who isn't going to do much more than catch a 5-yard outlet and then fall down. Those guys are UDFAs, now. Get a combo TE or maybe two. Draft one and sign a guy...draft two, if needed. Get guys who can block their guy, and are a meaningful threat in the short to intermediate zones (and will sneak behind coverage from time to time for a big play).

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:32 am

Washington is a combo TE. You don't get 16.2 ypc while being the country's best blocker without being a combo TE.

Watch Washington play and tell me he is not a combo TE. OMG. The kid has hands on him to circus catch, to one hand catch, to contested catch. He's got it all.

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

April 06, 2023 at 10:35 am

He may become one, it’s certainly plausible. He wasn’t really used as one and thus it’s potential not actual at this point. There are legitimate questions not yet answered, despite his formidable long speed.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 11:00 am

This is a pretty good window into the make-up of Darnell Washington:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPCJVwh3d74

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 06, 2023 at 11:14 am

One can be a fan of his potential upside without losing sight of the fact that it remains as yet unrealized and what that means.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 11:50 am

Oh, please. All of their potential upsides are unrealized.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

April 06, 2023 at 01:08 pm

Not so. They are all unrealized against NFL opposition but most early picks have consistently realized it in college. In terms of pass catching, Washington has not consistently done so. That doesn’t mean he can’t, but it does mean he hasn’t shown an ability to run routes and make plays he’d have to. Of course, he wasn’t asked to, but he still hasn’t shown that he can.

Don’t misunderstand me, I like Washington a lot. I just see him as more of a projection pick in the first. As a blocker he’s a 3rd rounder at best. I wouldn’t take him at 15 for that reason, but I might take a gamble on him late in the first. The reason I wouldn’t is who else that might mean missing or the chance to get more picks by trading back.

0 points
1
1
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 04:05 pm

Oh, I appreciate that, Coldworld. Just don't be dissin' my draft crush!!! LOL.

No, not fanboying it. I see him play and project to what he could be with the Love Gun, and what he can produce as a true in-line TE in GB, and I like it a lot.

He was used to getting 60 receptions a year as a WR before switching to TE at Georgia. I've watched a lot of his film, and have zero concerns about his ability to pick up every nuance to route running, blocking, everything associated with the job. He's driven, a self motivator to be his best, and I think he'd make a great Packers TE from Day 1.

Projecting to the Pros? I don't know... Georgia, the 2-Time National Champions in his time there might have run a Pro set or two. 16.2 ypc average. That's big.

Confused how he's a R3 at best when Washington's blocking is considered best in class? It's the best part of his game.

I'd have no problem with Gutekunst taking him straight off the top.

0 points
0
0
ShivaJim's picture

April 06, 2023 at 03:57 pm

Washington is all over draft boards, but he is rising. I think he has all pro potential. I'd take him at 15. Help the run, pass blocking, and is a big target who is very hard to get down.

1 points
1
0
Tundraboy's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:34 pm

That's why I suggested getting the three above.Stock up on them like running backs. Pantry is bare anyway

1 points
1
0
Rvandeslunt's picture

April 05, 2023 at 11:31 pm

Would like our first two picks to be used on an OT and Edge. Then target WR's and TE,s in the middle rounds like Tillman, Mingo, Kraft and Kuntz.

1 points
2
1
Johnblood27's picture

April 06, 2023 at 06:30 am

Those are great thoughts...

but you completely forgot that the roster is almost completely devoid of Safetys and DL.

0 points
1
1
NickPerry's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:14 am

I know this won't be popular but I'd love to see an offensive draft for once by Gute. Just for fun lets imagine the Packers get both of the Jets 2nd round picks in the Rodgers trade. Grab a WR, TE, Tackle, and a Safety all before the dreaded 3rd round pick which IMO should be packaged with another pick to move up to the end of the 2nd round and grab another TE or RB.

If Gute had 5 picks in the top 60 selections, not only would he give Love more weapons, but he's also address the two biggest needs on Defense. Rodgers had a LOADED WR room when he took over. I agree, the Packers should have done much, MUCH more giving Rodgers more weapons over the years. But if Gute or ANYONE things Watson and Doubs will be enough, it will be a LONG ass season even if Love plays great. They have to address the skill positions OFTEN in this draft.

6 points
8
2
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:24 am

If you really wanna have fun, Nick, throw the 13 in there too.

Can vouch.

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:59 am

"I know this won't be popular but I'd love to see an offensive draft for once by Gute."

Aside from Jaire, the 2018 draft was pretty offensive.

I agree in that, at some point, you've got to let your recent draft investments work and tend to needs--and projected needs based on what you're going to have to do in the near future in roster management--in other areas.

"But if Gute or ANYONE things Watson and Doubs will be enough, it will be a LONG ass season even if Love plays great."

You've got to have 6-8 pass-catchers who can play. Too many injuries over the course of a season to not have that.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:47 am

We have 5 WRs and 3 TEs plus a H Back currently on the roster.
Of those, Melton, Cotton, Allen and Guggemos have never been active. Much as I like Toure as a prospect, he’s not been given a chance to prove himself and Davis has yet to do so. We also don’t know if the H back role is still relevant.

Typically we have 10 or more WRs in camp and 5 or 6 TEs. We typically have 5 or 6 WRs on the roster plus a couple in the PS and 3 or 4 TEs. We also typically see players lost to injury. We therefore absolutely need pass catchers. That’s need in the true sense. Yes, we will take catchers: we absolutely have to. The only question is when. We have minimal cap, so we will draft some.

As we know there are other holes and this isn’t a great elite offensive draft. That raises the potential of the first rounder being D, you can’t force a draft, but there will be a number of offensive skill picks.

2 points
2
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:32 am

Nick,
Been beating the drums about needing offensive weapons early in the draft for a looooong time! Seems inevitable it has to happen. I'm guessing every NFL GM is anticipating the Packers going heavily offense. There are several defensive Edge players that will go in round 1 that I absolutely love, but offense is needed. Anyone recall how when Jordan Love lost about 80% of his offensive starters after 2018 he fell off the cliff in 2019?

Just cannot allow that to happen to a first year starter and expect his confidence to remain.

0 points
0
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:34 am

Im fine with it as long as were not reaching in the 1st round. The only 2 skill position players I see who are actually worth the #15 pick are both running backs, which the Packers arent likely to draft. If they stay at 15, hopefully its for Skoronski or one of the other top tackles if they fall. Otherwise, I'd trade down. Multiple times if possible. Id be trying to get as many 2nd and 3rd round picks as possible. Theres a whole list of guys id love to see the Packers draft who will fall in those 2 rounds.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

April 06, 2023 at 08:52 am

List of documented Packers pre-draft visits/contacts here:

https://walterfootball.com/prospectMeetings/byteam

0 points
0
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:19 am

I dont love this. Loaded tight end class but we gotta go after the one with a back injury? Yeah sure maybe his back heals but I'm not betting a 1st rounder on that. This draft is too important. I heard the Gronk example on the livestream but that's such an extreme outlier. Not even Gronk was a 1st round pick. If I'm Gute, I'm trading down and trying to acquire as many 2nd, 3rd, and 4th round picks as I can get. Then, I'd draft Sam Laporta. No idea why hes not being talked about more. Iowa tight end with speed, quickness, strength at the catch, and excellent blocking. And hes likely gonna be available in the 2nd round. Sign me up twice.

3 points
3
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:37 pm

The second round is the Value round as it was in 2019-22.

2 points
2
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

April 06, 2023 at 10:29 am

I too want a big investment into the WRs andTEs in this draft, but I’m still leaning to defensive front 7 for pick 15 AND I’d be fine using our next pick there as well if that’s the BPA. But from that point on, I’d be pleased with a LOT of receivers.

1 points
2
1
stockholder's picture

April 06, 2023 at 11:04 am

Comparing the Ravens visits to the Packers.
We're screwed.

0 points
1
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:39 pm

Who cares about Visits. The 5th column speculation and all that jazz. The Film reveals the Players. The only reason to check on certain guys is for medical reasons.

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 06, 2023 at 04:54 pm

Or character issues.

0 points
0
0
Rebelgb's picture

April 06, 2023 at 11:50 am

Just watched tape on Washington. My God the Packers need to draft that guy!

0 points
3
3
ShivaJim's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:32 pm

The highlights are great, and what he did at the combine was amazing. Did you see the catch at the Senior Bowl? Wow.

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 12:43 pm

Do not believe he played in the Senior Bowl.

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 06, 2023 at 02:14 pm

He did have a pretty good catch at the combine though.

https://247sports.com/college/georgia/Article/NFL-Combine-2023-Darnell-W...

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 02:37 pm

I'd run to the freaking podium with the card now if I could... all the way to Kansas City.

1 points
2
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 06, 2023 at 02:42 pm

Where was the safety help??

0 points
0
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:03 am

yes, but exactly where? most all the teams are thinking the same thing. he will not be available at #45, but #15 seems like it may be just a little too rich for him.

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:40 am

If you think 15 is too high to draft him, you try and trade back. If nobody wants to trade back, and he's your guy, you go ahead and pull the trigger at #15 if you're convinced he won't be there at #45.

I trade back with the Chargers at 21 or Bengals at 28, add a pick and take Darnell Washington at either spot and I count it as a huge win.

Washington will pay dividends in the run game (Big Dog 2.0) and in the Red Zone, which has been a sore spot over the years. Nothing will give a young QB confidence like having a guy you can count on when things break down.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:51 am

That’s the range I’d look to as well. I’m willing to take a punt on him but not at 15. There are likely more valuable alternatives in our current situation there, including the extra pick option.

0 points
0
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 07, 2023 at 12:54 pm

So much more to learn regarding the trade and will evolve, but two selections in round 1 would be almost a slam dunk for me to draft Washington with one of the picks. If the Pack ends up with #13 I'd definitely draft an offensive weapon like Johnston, or JSN. Following that then draft Washington at #15 to give you another good receiving threat combined with improved run blocking. The early offensive weapon would take pressure off selecting Washington at #15, and it would allow him time to hopefully develop a little better downfield as a receiver.

Be hard passing on defenders like Myles Murphy, Tyree Wilson (if there), or a DL like Kancey or Bresee, Mazi Smith, but I'd go more defense focus in round 2 & 3.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 07, 2023 at 11:05 am

Athlon has him going off the board at #18. That was published pre Combine.

Take him.

1 points
1
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 07, 2023 at 12:47 pm

BD,
If the Packers had #13 & #15 I wouldn't hesitate to draft him at #15, or like you say drop back 5 or 6 spots to take him. I am thinking there are very few guaranteed good players (if any) in the draft, but Washington would be one of those guys. Without question he will be a dominant blocker his whole career, and as you say in those short yardage situations, and the red zone he likely will be pretty tough. He has that body where he can just shield and block out the smaller defender.

I think anything more is just a bonus, such as, he continues to develop as a receiver over the next few years.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

April 06, 2023 at 06:27 pm

Enjoying the draft guide more than normal. So much more to look forward to this year . After my first dive I am left with the overall impression that we absolutely need to draft two tight ends with whatever picks we use, and one of those definitely has to be a high-end athletic freak like Kuntz .

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:05 pm

There’s at least 10 really high RAS TEs in this draft. So we should have opportunities. One or two are really more jumbo WRs though.

Zack Kuntz, Old Dominion RAS: 10.00
Luke Musgrave, Oregon State — 9.95
Darnell Washington, Georgia — 9.85
Luke Schoonmaker, Michigan — 9.75
Tucker Kraft, S. Dakota State — 9.58
Sam LaPorta, Iowa — 9.26
Will Mallory, Miami — 9.19
Brenton Strange, Penn State — 8.92
Josh Whyle, Cincinnatti — 8.86
Davis Allen, Clemson — 8.77

Mallory is more of a big receiver, but gets overlooked when in fact he might be a relatively good general purpose receiving TE with a little improvement in blocking that we could pick up in the 5th round. He might be a candidate for the Lazard role in part.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 06, 2023 at 07:21 pm

What about the Notre Dame stud?

If I'm understanding your point, it kind of underscores what I'm saying about using the higher pick elsewhere and getting the TE later.

1 points
1
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:43 pm

Might as well re-sign Big Dog, they're about the same speed... ; )

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 10:00 pm

Don’t laugh , now… laugh later if he prefers coming back here over NYJ.

Now, THAT would be funny.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 06, 2023 at 09:57 pm

I like that Mallory idea, Cdub. (Chuckling, but that’s pretty good)

I don’t like the Lazard wannabe from Iowa State, Xavier Hutchinson. Slow. Geh.

Hadn’t thought of that, but it’s a great idea.

0 points
0
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 07, 2023 at 10:06 am

Tundra,
And think just how more enjoyable the upcoming draft will be with a bunch of NY Jet's draft choices to go along with ours? :)

So much fun to think about the possibility of having 2 first round picks, and 2 second round picks and the direction Gutey might go in each round. The options are endless! My biggest hope are the Packers can get a few good picks in 2023 even if Bachtiari goes to the Jets. I want to go young & build the team through the draft for the next couple of years.

1 points
1
0