Packers Daily Links: Al Harris Could Start vs. Green Bay

Former Packers cornerback Al Harris might start against his old team on Sunday. That and more in today's Daily Links...

Former Packers cornerback Al Harris might get to start against his old team when the St. Louis Rams come to Green Bay this weekend. "The 36-year-old Harris starred with the Packers from 2003 through 2009," according to an Associated Press article. "He has been playing in nickel and dime packages but was with the first string on Monday when the winless Rams (0-4) returned from their bye." Harris downplayed facing Green Bay in an interview insisting it was just another football game.

The Packers will not receive a seventh-round draft choice they made by trading fullback Quinn Johnson to the Tennessee Titans, reports Bob McGinn of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. "An NFL source said Johnson would have had to play in five games in order for Green Bay to have received the seventh-round pick," writes McGinn. The Titans waived Johnson after four games. He has been claimed by the Broncos.

With Chad Clifton out for several weeks with a hamstring injury, attention now turns to his replacements. "McCarthy said he and general manager Ted Thompson discussed their roster options but that no move is imminent," writes Jason Wilde of ESPNMilwaukee.com. "The team will have a roster spot available when it formally places Pro Bowl safety Nick Collins, who suffered a career-threatening neck injury Sept. 18 and underwent season-ending surgery Sept. 27, on injured reserve." The Packers worked out former draft choice Tony Moll last week, and veteran Mark Tauscher would seem to be an option as well. Perhaps they only make a move if they determine Clifton is out for the year, however.

More on Clifton's injury comes from the Green Bay Press-Gazette, Fox Sports Wisconsin, Packer Report, Fox SportsAssociated Press and the Packers official website.

Tom Silverstein of the Journal Sentinel examines the previous times the Packers have had to replace Chad Clifton due to injury and says the Packers have more options this time around. "For once, the Packers seem equipped to handle the loss of Clifton," writes Silverstein. "Newhouse and Sherrod have a long way to go to call themselves adequate fill-ins, but if Clifton is out for the season McCarthy at least knows he has two long, athletic bodies whose natural position is tackle." And that's not even mentioning Bryan Bulaga as a possibility to shift over to left tackle either.

Analyzing the play of the two young tackles on Sunday, Cliff Christl and Eric Baranczyk of the Press-Gazette came away impressed. "Rather than sign someone else’s over-the-hill rejects when their roster might look thin in spots to outsiders, they show confidence in young players and have them ready to play when injuries strike," reads the article.

A feature on Marshall Newhouse appears at Packer Report (subscription required).

The kickoff return game is analyzed by Kareem Copeland of the Press-Gazette looking for reasons for its inefficiency. "Cobb fielded the first two Falcons kickoffs eight- and six-yards deep in the end zone and advanced them to the 14- and 16-yard lines," writes Copeland. Head coach Mike McCarthy said the backside blocking was not up to par.

The play of the Packers secondary was deemed better by Tyler Dunne of the Journal Sentinel. "Sam Shields' deep, one-on-one breakup on Julio Jones," lists Dunne. "Charlie Peprah's tip-drill interception to thwart a late game-tying drive. Tramon Williams playing like, well, Tramon Williams." An interview with defensive coordinator Dom Capers echoes the sentiment.

The upcoming Packers schedule is scrutinized by Rob Demovsky of the Press-Gazette. "The challenge this week for coach Mike McCarthy and his staff will be to make sure the two subpar teams on their remaining pre-bye schedule don’t lull their players into a false sense of security, especially given some of the mistakes the Packers have made even on the way to their perfect start," writes Demovksy. McCarthy said it would be a challenge to face the Rams, because they're coming off a bye and have had two weeks to prepare for the Packers.

The Packers defense is moving up in its rankings.

The Packers forced the Falcons to be one dimensional, according to Kareem Copeland.

More on the Packers stock sale comes from the Associated Press.

Rating the Packers vs. the Falcons is Bob McGinn of the Journal Sentinel.

An article from a national Associated Press writer has the Packers "looking at greatness."

Brian Carriveau is the editor of the Maple Street Press Packers Annual. To contact Brian, email [email protected].

0 points
 

Comments (17)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
aussiepacker's picture

October 11, 2011 at 09:20 am

I know this is off topic but i just watched the bears v's lions game and that lions Dline is SCAAAARRRRY! and if stafford gets more accurate the lions will be a handful for years to come.

0 points
0
0
cow42's picture

October 11, 2011 at 10:00 am

yep.

0 points
0
0
dullgeek's picture

October 11, 2011 at 10:30 am

Yep. Been scared of the Lions since preseason. Every other Packers observer/fan has been trying to reassure me that the Packers are better than the Lions.

I'm still worried about them.

That said, the Bears O line hasn't exactly been stellar this year.

0 points
0
0
Norman's picture

October 11, 2011 at 01:56 pm

Agreed. The Falcons hadn't had a sack in three weeks, and had several against Green Bay in the first half, plus several pressures. The Lions D Line is much better than Atlanta's, but their secondary is porous. By Thanksgiving though, I think our O Line will be playing much better, with or without Clifton (hopefully with). Should be a great game, especially of both teams are 10-0. But I can't see the Lions winning 10 in a row (or 14 I think, counting 2010).

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

October 11, 2011 at 10:41 am

Are they a great DL? Yes.

Did they play against the most incompetent unit since the 2002 Houston Texans, a unit particularly bad against attacking DL like the Lions and Giants? Also true.

When Cutler had time, heck, even when he didn't, he was able to exploit their awful secondary.

If we face them with our rookies, it'll be a long game. If at least Bulaga is back, they won't stop Rodgers.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

October 11, 2011 at 12:00 pm

I just posted this in another thread, but, yeah, it was very hard to tell whether the Lions' pass rush was that good or if the Bears' o-line was that bad.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

October 11, 2011 at 01:13 pm

Completely agreed RS. The Lions have excellent parts of a team put together, but they aren't close to the team than GB is when all 53 are considered.

They are good - not great IMO.

0 points
0
0
NoWayJose's picture

October 11, 2011 at 02:07 pm

The Lions have weaknesses, but they also also have some elite players, and one absolutely dominant unit. Going to good for a lot of wins, but it's still too hard to predict how many.

Looking at who they've beat though, there's nothing too impressive there:

@TB (not as impressive as originally thought)
KC (gimme)
@MIN (meh)
@DAl (solid)
CHI (lord knows how you evaluate the Bears these days)

Very respectable, but nothing to show that they can play with the big boys yet.

0 points
0
0
MarkinMadison's picture

October 11, 2011 at 09:30 am

I may be in the minority, but I have no problem with Cobb bringing kicks out of the endzone. We lost an average of about three yards a posession on his first three returns against Atlanta. This is not a team that struggles to move the ball. Starting three yards back is still 1st and 10. Cobb is a proven threat. Let him go for it.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

October 11, 2011 at 12:00 pm

I agree.

But he needs to fair catch more punts.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

October 11, 2011 at 10:15 am

"Sam Shields' deep, one-on-one breakup on Julio Jones," lists Dunne...

I thought the Falcons really made a mistake in the Julio Jones vs. Sam Shields match-up in general. I obviously didn't see every instance they were competing against one another, but the Falcons were really playing to one of Shields definitive strengths by letting him just cover fly routes against Jones. Sam can run with him and doesn't have to 'think' on those routes.

Thought that was a strategic miscalculation by the Falcons.

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

October 11, 2011 at 10:43 am

One thing I've noticed, but didn't pay attention the whole game (Nagler, someone please help me out here) is that Sam Shields didn't play bump and run.

I think Capers made a point to not put Sam in press coverage at all, and just let him play off his man.

0 points
0
0
Tommyboy's picture

October 11, 2011 at 11:06 am

I still don't see how Tauchser is a viable option. I get that he knows the system, but I thought he looked downright awful at times last year. When you couple that with another injury and that he'd be a fairly expensive solution, I just don't see the Pack going after him. They like resigning their own, no doubt. But, I just see Mark as done.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

October 11, 2011 at 12:01 pm

Totally agree. Thinking it'll be Tony Moll or someone of that ilk.

0 points
0
0
Norman's picture

October 11, 2011 at 02:01 pm

Looks to me like the Quinn Johnson trade was just TT doing a favor to an old friend, Mike Reinfeldt. Maybe Reinfeldt has a spare tackle we could borrow for 4 weeks and he could return the favor?

Oh, and good luck Al Harris, but just not too much good luck this week. Great Packer, Great Man, but sorry Al we're going to have to pound your current team. One of the most beloved ex-Packers, just like Colledge and Favre. :-)

0 points
0
0
Ct Sharpe Cheddar's picture

October 11, 2011 at 06:05 pm

Popinga is also on the Rams.Speaking of ez-Packers prps to Nick Barnett with 2 picks on Sunday doing the Ralph Wilson leap

0 points
0
0
Wagszilla's picture

October 12, 2011 at 02:34 am

We all love Al but dude is about to get torched along with Justin King.

0 points
0
0