NFL: Saints Guilty Of Bounties For Injuries

An NFL investigation has determined that the New Orleans Saints violated the rules regarding "bounties."

There's a lot here, so I'll just let you read the release from the NFL. I'll probably have more thoughts over the weekend.

From the league:

NFL DISCLOSES FINDINGS OF INVESTIGATION
INTO VIOLATIONS OF "BOUNTY RULE"

A lengthy investigation by the NFL's security department has disclosed that between 22 and 27 defensive players on the New Orleans Saints, as well as at least one assistant coach, maintained a "bounty" program funded primarily by players in violation of NFL rules during the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons, the NFL announced today.

The league's investigation determined that this improper "Pay for Performance" program included "bounty" payments to players for inflicting injuries on opposing players that would result in them being removed from a game.

The findings - corroborated by multiple independent sources - have been presented to Commissioner Roger Goodell, who will determine the appropriate discipline for the violation.

"The payments here are particularly troubling because they involved not just payments for 'performance,' but also for injuring opposing players," Commissioner Goodell said. "The bounty rule promotes two key elements of NFL football: player safety and competitive integrity.

"It is our responsibility to protect player safety and the integrity of our game, and this type of conduct will not be tolerated. We have made significant progress in changing the culture with respect to player safety and we are not going to relent. We have more work to do and we will do it."

The players regularly contributed cash into a pool and received improper cash payments of two kinds from the pool based on their play in the previous week's game. Payments were made for plays such as interceptions and fumble recoveries, but the program also included "bounty" payments for "cart-offs" (meaning that the opposing player was carried off the field) and "knockouts" (meaning that the opposing player was not able to return to the game).

The investigation showed that the total amount of funds in the pool may have reached $50,000 or more at its height during the 2009 playoffs. The program paid players $1,500 for a "knockout" and $1,000 for a "cart-off" with payouts doubling or tripling during the playoffs.

The investigation included the review of approximately 18,000 documents totaling more than 50,000 pages, interviews of a wide range of individuals and the use of outside forensic experts to verify the authenticity of key documents.

The NFL has a longstanding rule prohibiting "Non-Contract Bonuses." Non-contract bonuses violate both the NFL Constitution and By-Laws and the Collective Bargaining Agreement.  Clubs are advised every year of this rule in a memo from the commissioner. Citing Sections 9.1(C)(8), and 9.3(F) and (G) of the Constitution and By-Laws, the memo for the 2011 season stated:

"No bonus or award may directly or indirectly be offered, promised, announced,  or paid to a player for his or his team's performance against a particular team or opposing player or a particular group thereof. No bonuses or awards may be offered or paid for on field misconduct (for example, personal fouls to or injuries inflicted on opposing players)."

"Our investigation began in early 2010 when allegations were first made that Saints players had targeted opposing players, including Kurt Warner of the Cardinals and Brett Favre of the Vikings," Commissioner Goodell said. "Our security department interviewed numerous players and other individuals. At the time, those interviewed denied that any such program existed and the player that made the allegation retracted his earlier assertions. As a result, the allegations could not be proven. We recently received significant and credible new information and the investigation was re-opened during the latter part of the 2011 season."

The additional investigation established the following facts:

1.    During the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons, the players and other participants involved used their own money to fund a "Pay for Performance" program. Players earned cash awards for plays such as interceptions or fumble recoveries. They also earned "bounty" payments for "cart-offs" and "knockouts." All such payments violate league rules for non-contract bonuses.

2.    Players were willing and enthusiastic participants in the program, contributing regularly and at times pledging large amounts. Between 22 and 27 defensive players contributed funds to the pool over the course of three NFL seasons. In some cases, the amounts pledged were both significant and directed against a specific opposing player.

3.    The bounty program was administered by defensive coordinator Gregg Williams with the knowledge of other defensive coaches. Funds were contributed on occasion by Williams.

4.    Saints owner Tom Benson gave immediate and full cooperation to the investigators. The evidence conclusively established that Mr. Benson was not aware of the bounty program. When informed earlier this year of the new information, Mr. Benson advised league staff that he had directed his general manager, Mickey Loomis, to ensure that any bounty program be discontinued immediately. The evidence showed that Mr. Loomis did not carry out Mr. Benson's directions. Similarly, when the initial allegations were discussed with Mr. Loomis in 2010, he denied any knowledge of a bounty program and pledged that he would ensure that no such program was in place. There is no evidence that Mr. Loomis took any effective action to stop these practices.

5.    Although head coach Sean Payton was not a direct participant in the funding or administration of the program, he was aware of the allegations, did not make any detailed inquiry or otherwise seek to learn the facts, and failed to stop the bounty program. He never instructed his assistant coaches or players that a bounty program was improper and could not continue.

6.    There is no question that a bounty program violates long-standing league rules.  Payments of this type - even for legitimate plays such as interceptions or fumble recoveries - are forbidden because they are inconsistent with the Collective Bargaining Agreement and well-accepted rules relating to NFL player contracts.

Commissioner Goodell has advised the Saints that he will hold further proceedings to determine the discipline to be assessed against individuals and the club. This will include conferring with the NFL Players Association and individual player leaders regarding appropriate discipline and remedial steps.

The discipline could include fines and suspensions and, in light of the competitive nature of the violation, forfeiture of draft choices. Any discipline may be appealed as provided for in the Constitution and By-Laws and Collective Bargaining Agreement. Any appeal would be heard and decided by the commissioner.

Commissioner Goodell also advised the Saints that he is retaining jurisdiction and reserving his authority to impose further discipline if additional information comes to his attention.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (35)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
FITZCORE1252's EVO's picture

March 02, 2012 at 02:54 pm

Low. Rent.

GBP 4 LIFE

0 points
0
0
Wisconsin German's picture

March 02, 2012 at 02:55 pm

Pathetic.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

March 02, 2012 at 03:06 pm

I can't imagine Saints defensive players from this squad eventually pursuing free-agency and being very well received by players that were on their schedule at this time. How's that introductory conversation go?

"Hey, sorry I intentionally tried to disrupt your livelihood by head-hunting but that $1,500 bounty was just too much to pass up. No hard feelings, right?"

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

March 02, 2012 at 03:17 pm

I'm in absolute shock. This news that players would get rewarded for hurting the opponent in such a gentleman's game comes as a surprise, and makes me question the integrity of the sport.

What's next? Some kind of performance enhancing substances being used by players?

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

March 02, 2012 at 03:21 pm

It's not shocking there are bounties out there, I'm not that naive. But when you start paying for knocking an opponent unconscious or getting them 'carted off' it's crossing a line. You're aiming at ending a guys career. It can still be a violent game, but not with that intent.

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

March 02, 2012 at 03:44 pm

It's like Garda said. Everybody is cheating. They just happened to get caught, so the NFL must save face.

0 points
0
0
Ebongreen's picture

March 02, 2012 at 03:21 pm

My question: how does this affect Gregg Williams and his livelihood as a coach? 'Cause, ya know, you're the freakin' defensive coordinator _administering the bounty fund_, and you're now with another team.

Could this get him banned? Lifetime, maybe? Wouldn't that be an interesting message to send...

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

March 02, 2012 at 03:26 pm

You can bet he'll be suspended. I would not be surprised if it was a full year.

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's EVO's picture

March 02, 2012 at 03:50 pm

Should be. How F'ing stupid is this guy? In this day and age... Just plain stupid.

0 points
0
0
bryce's picture

March 02, 2012 at 09:41 pm

If there's any justice in the NFL at all, this dude deserves a very long suspension or, preferably, a ban. That is only if Goodell was serious about protecting players.

0 points
0
0
Don Hutson's picture

March 02, 2012 at 10:33 pm

Seriously, how can you allow someone who sanctioned something like this to continue to derive his livelyhood from the NFL? I understand that Sean Payton also knew this was going on (from an ESPN Milwaukee broadcast), how can he be allowed to continue his career having ignored this? First this is criminal behavior as well as against league policy (playing with intent to injure/mame). The NFL needs to come down mucho heavy in this situation. Also resind the 2010 Superbowl Championship - leave an eternal black-mark in the record book to remind those of like mind of the price of taking a game to the level of a war.

0 points
0
0
D.D. Driver's picture

March 04, 2012 at 06:39 am

After all the new anti-concussion/player safety policies, here is where the rubber meets the road.

I guarantee you that personal injury lawyers are anxious to see what the NFL does. I don't see how the NFL can get away with slaps on the wrist.

It will also be interesting to see how the NFLPA responds. Does it take the suspended players' side of does the NFLPA take the side of player safety.

My predictions:

Gregg Williams gets the indefinite suspension able to reapply for reinstatement in a year.

Payton gets a six game suspension minimum (Jim Tressel got 6 games for (in my opinion) way less).

Basically the whole defense with 2-6 game suspensions.

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

March 04, 2012 at 07:35 am

Agree with everything save for the length of Payton's suspension. I think he gets a year.

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

March 04, 2012 at 12:07 pm

Speaking honestly, I'd be shocked if the NFLPA's stance is anything but "the players were forced into this kind of situation and it's all the coaches' and the NFL's fault for allowing it to happen".

0 points
0
0
andrewgarda's picture

March 02, 2012 at 03:33 pm

This is pretty bad. Yes, this is absolutely going on all over the place all the time, but the league is trying to make it a safer environment BLAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA oh sorry, just thought that was funny.

Anyway, they're making the field safer *snicker* for players so they need to come down hard on this.

And like VideoTapeGate, they got caught. If you cheat and get caught? You get hammered.

0 points
0
0
bryce's picture

March 02, 2012 at 09:42 pm

Except in Spygate...they got scolded.

0 points
0
0
BubbaOne's picture

March 02, 2012 at 05:03 pm

Wow, both Payton and Williams almost ended up in GB. Some even said TT missed by hiring MM instead of Payton. And didn't Williams turn down MM who then hired Capers.

And I would love to have been a fly on the wall the next mtg of Benson and Loomis after Benson found out Loomis disobeyed his directive.

If Williams is deserving of a suspension I think Payton gets a smaller one. And of course they both get fined. Hey does Goodell get money for a knockout for each player or coach that's misses a game???

0 points
0
0
packsmack25's picture

March 02, 2012 at 05:07 pm

I don't care and I now adore Jonathan Vilma.

0 points
0
0
BubbaOne's picture

March 02, 2012 at 05:10 pm

Looks like it's us on Wed...Saints are the Ain'ts again.

0 points
0
0
Thedon's picture

March 02, 2012 at 05:14 pm

No surprise here. This story has been floating around for a while. Next you're going to tell me that most players use PED's.

0 points
0
0
Sam's picture

March 02, 2012 at 05:49 pm

It was pretty obvious their game plan against the Vikes in the 2009 NFCCG was to take out Favre. Doesn't suprise me. Hope Sharper wasn't one of the 22 players involved I always liked Darren.

0 points
0
0
BrianD's picture

March 02, 2012 at 07:04 pm

This type of story makes me take pride in having MM as a coach. I firmly believe he would never allow this attitude in his locker rooms.

0 points
0
0
Rocky70's picture

March 03, 2012 at 12:37 am

One thing's for sure,
The way the Packers tackled in season 2011,
No one would think of accusing the Pack of having a bounty system in place.

0 points
0
0
Nerdmann's picture

March 03, 2012 at 02:06 am

+1

0 points
0
0
Chad Toporski's picture

March 03, 2012 at 06:02 am

I'm sorry, but just because "it happens everywhere" doesn't make it right. If we had that kind of attitude towards other things, I shudder to think of what this country would become. This is pathetic, and frankly I think their Super Bowl title should be in jeopardy.

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

March 04, 2012 at 12:12 pm

Don't get me wrong, I'm with you, but the issue is this is not the first time the NFL knows about this. They know and they've known for quite a while. And they know it happens in a lot of other teams.

But now it's public, and they have to do something.

Not because it's wrong.

Because it's public.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

March 05, 2012 at 12:28 pm

Well, the NFL is the entity that made it public with a large press release. It's not as though it were leaked and now they're forced to take action. They investigated it, they issued the press release and findings. If they had anything else this substantive on any other team I'm inclined to believe they would release the information, right?

Again, I understand other teams may have some manner of 'bounty' or pay-for-performance on hits, but I doubt the league has found anything quite this egregious.

0 points
0
0
Boothie's picture

March 03, 2012 at 07:15 am

The GM Mickey Loomis was also involved. The owner, Benson, told him to terminate it and he didn't... I think that Benson's comment is a little pollyannaish... we were bad, we've stopped it, but let's move on and play football.

I don't think it will work like that.

Just Sayin'

0 points
0
0
PackerBelle's picture

March 03, 2012 at 09:42 am

My issue with the bounties is not that they were incentives to perform but that they added incentives to hurt other players to a point where they couldn't return to the game.

Play hard, play aggressive, but seriously injuring another player should never be something you try to do.

0 points
0
0
Cole's picture

March 03, 2012 at 01:30 pm

For all the things I hate about Favre, that may have been the toughest performance I have ever seen.

Instead of bounty for hurting people how about bounty for making big plays, like I dunno, covering Vernon Davis.

0 points
0
0
BrianD's picture

March 03, 2012 at 10:38 pm

If the Saints lose any of their draft picks, Favre is inadvertently helping the Packers!

0 points
0
0
SoTxPhil's picture

March 03, 2012 at 01:51 pm

I heard a D. Sharper interview yesterday and he said he didn't see any of this big money being offered, but they did have things like $100-200 rewards for the first sack of the game or for INTs, but not to take someone out. He must have been naive if he didn't know all of the other stuff was happening. You would think Benson wouth have to can his GM for his continuing actions after he was told to stop it. They said that G. Williams was acused of something like this with other teams, Redskins, so he might get a ban from the NFL to make a real pt. I'm sure Payton and the players will just get fined, but the team is bound to lose some draft choices as punishment.

0 points
0
0
Norman's picture

March 03, 2012 at 02:32 pm

I guess they didn't put up a bounty on Marshawn Lynch in the playoff game loss to Seattle or else someone would have, you know, tackled him or something.

0 points
0
0
packsmack25's picture

March 03, 2012 at 04:32 pm

Obviously no bounty on Vernon Davis, either.

0 points
0
0
FITZCORE1252's EVO's picture

March 05, 2012 at 12:25 pm

I don't want to hear players bitching about 18 games. Just don't. They're obviously not as concerned about player safety as they would like us to believe. You're gonna possibly end a peers career for a little Friday night cash? STFU and play how many games you're told.

0 points
0
0