Nagler's 53
Aaron Nagler's take on what the Packers' Final 53 should look like heading into the kickoff of the 2011 season against the Saints.
By PackerAaron
As I say every year: This is not what I think the Packers will do.
It's what I would do.
QB
- Aaron Rodgers
- Matt Flynn
- Graham Harrell
HB
- Ryan Grant
- James Starks
- Alex Green

FB
- John Kuhn
TE
- Jermichael Finley
- Andrew Quarless
- Tom Crabtree
- D.J. Williams
- Ryan Taylor
WR
- Greg Jennings
- Donald Driver
- James Jones
- Jordy Nelson
- Randall Cobb
OL
- Chad Clifton
- T.J. Lang
- Scott Wells
- Josh Sitton
- Bryan Bulaga
- Derek Sherrod
- Marshall Newhouse
- Evan Dietrich-Smith
DL
- Ryan Pickett
- BJ Raji
- Howard Green
- Mike Neal
- C.J. Wilson
- Jarius Wynn
ILB
- AJ Hawk
- Desmond Bishop
- Robert Francois
- D.J. Smith
OLB
- Clay Matthews
- Erik Walden
- Frank Zombo
- Vic So'oto
- Brad Jones
CB
- Charles Woodson
- Tramon Williams
- Sam Shields
- Jarret Bush
- Pat Lee
- Davon House
S
- Nick Collins
- Morgan Burnett
- Charlie Peprah
- Brandon Underwood
Specialists:
- Mason Crosby
- Tim Masthay
- Brett Goode
Have at it.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________




Comments (100)
September 01, 2011 at 11:44 pm
I like it, but just curious, who would be the first TE that would be gone if you had to chose?
PackerAaron
September 01, 2011 at 11:56 pm
Thank god I don't have to. ;)
September 02, 2011 at 12:03 am
Ahhh come one lol. I also think they'll keep them all, but I am worried that we need another guy on the OL. We are extremely talented at TE and to me it makes the most sense to cut where we have the most depth/talent than in other spots like LB or DB or OL. Could we actually trade someone on the team?
September 02, 2011 at 01:41 am
Crabtree would be the one to get axed. Taylor can run block, plays better plays much better special teams, and is a much better catching the ball than Crabtree.
September 02, 2011 at 07:21 am
I agree what can you do with 5 tight ends
September 02, 2011 at 10:58 am
Why dont we trade Flynn...He is leaving next year and we will get nothing for him...Harrell can be a competent number 2 and it frees up a roster spot for a guy on the fringe
Also I say Quarless is gone...Injuries, drops, effort and blocking...We already have two TEs with his skills but better (Finley and Smith)...Put that with our two bruiser blocker TE's (Crabtree and Taylor)
Other than that I am in agreement
September 02, 2011 at 10:59 am
Oh Yes...And I agree with David - Pat Lee has to go
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 11:18 am
Common misperception that the Packers will get nothing for Flynn. If he signs as a starter somewhere they'll get a decent comp pick.
September 02, 2011 at 11:21 am
Why not trade him now for a DL or OL
September 01, 2011 at 11:49 pm
Brandon Underwood, really?
PackerAaron
September 01, 2011 at 11:55 pm
He can play corner and safety. Young, athletic and, most importantly, cheap.
September 02, 2011 at 01:30 am
Underwood hasn't shown anything all preseason. He's had off-the-field issues as well. Bush is listed as a CB/S. Also, hasn't Jennings just been better than Underwood?
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 05:58 am
I disagree that Underwood hasn't shown anything. Just because he hasn't had INTs thrown right to him (see: Jennings) doesn't mean he's not playing well. And I like Jennings' potential, but he could be stashed on the practice squad, though its possible another team might take a flier on him.
Myself, I stick with the guy who has been in the system a few years and who you're only paying $480,000.
September 01, 2011 at 11:51 pm
Great projection, in my opinion. I think we'll see So'oto get a lot of time at starting OLB opposite Matthews in the regular season.
September 01, 2011 at 11:58 pm
No MD Jennings, Josh Gordy, or Brandian Ross? I think one more DB will make the team, not sure which one though..
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 12:06 am
I'd be shocked if its Ross.
September 02, 2011 at 12:16 am
I'd drop Underwood for MD Jennings. What's your practice squad? I'd like to see them keep Saine.
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 12:20 am
Liked what we saw from Saine. I'd like to see him on the PS
September 02, 2011 at 12:21 am
Agreed. Did not know he had the highest score on the wonderlick before tonight! He's ran hard and showed real skill...
September 02, 2011 at 01:59 am
Lots of speed and receiving ability.
September 01, 2011 at 11:58 pm
Im sorry, but Pat Lee has got to go. I also would not mind seeing Brad Jones leave with the recent emergence of So'oto. Jones doesn't really bring much to the table. Even cutting one of those guys would free up space for Gurley or West. I would prefer Gurley simply for his size.
September 02, 2011 at 12:03 am
You want to let your only experienced backup at Outside LB (Jones) go???That doen't make much sense.
September 02, 2011 at 12:19 am
I like Gurley too. Dude can go up over a short CB and get the ball uncontested. He's 6'4" about 220 and ran a 4.5, which is what Greg Jennings ran. Supposedly never dropped a pass in college.
He's also intriguing for his apparent ability to block punts. Although the fact that the Chiefs blocked one today has me wondering... Was it just Gurley getting his hands on punts in practice?
September 01, 2011 at 11:59 pm
At what point does it become prudent to let go of a known-but-disappointing quantity (Lee) in exchange for an unknown-but-promising quantity (Gordy)?
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 06:02 am
Struggled with this. I said on TV a week ago that Gordy could be there instead of House or Lee. I still think that's possible.
September 01, 2011 at 11:59 pm
Only 8 OL? They always keep at least 9.
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 12:05 am
Right. And as I said, I don't think this is what the Packers will do. I would stash Schlauderaff on the practice squad. I doubt they will.
September 02, 2011 at 12:14 am
If he could be stashed it would be a coup. There always seem to be 1-2 OL that never see the field.
September 02, 2011 at 12:01 am
i would trade pat lee for josh gordy...but otherwise this is the best final roster suggestion i think i have seen
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 06:04 am
I usually err on the side of the guy who has been in the system - but you're probably right. And thanks.
September 02, 2011 at 12:06 am
The only change I would make would be to drop Underwood and keep Gurley. I like the decision to only keep 8 o linemen. McDonald, Dominguez and Schlauteraff really have not shown that they are worth keeping on the roster.
September 02, 2011 at 12:16 am
I like Gurley too. I wish we had another quality OL that we could keep!
September 02, 2011 at 12:10 am
First thing I would do is trade James jones. Then I would keep gurley and west. Keep Quinn Johnson. Cut Jared bush. Cut underwood. Cut brad jones and possibly zombo
September 02, 2011 at 12:16 am
Why keep Quinn anymore?
September 02, 2011 at 12:28 am
I agree. First read, I thought he was cutting Quinn Johnson, instead of keeping him.
For his size, his lead blocks don't seem to pack the punch they should -- and what else does he do?
September 02, 2011 at 09:23 am
"Ben, thank god you don't run the Packers."
-Everyone
September 02, 2011 at 12:11 am
So one bad snap is enough for McDonald to lose his job? I still think he's better and more versatile than EDS. I doubt the Packers only keep 8 if it means cutting him.
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 12:13 am
Not at all. I just haven't seen any improvement from him over last year, when I was surprised they kept him in the first place.
September 02, 2011 at 11:57 am
hmmm, i've been impressed consistently with McDonald... don't agree at all here. he makes he team
September 02, 2011 at 12:10 pm
Just curious, what in particular has impressed you about his game? What facet(s) of his game did you see improvement with?
September 02, 2011 at 12:39 pm
he's got great feet and is naturally as athletic as anyone on the line. I've watched the line closely this preseason and its been bad to be kind. he's always engaged with his man and almost never makes glaring mistakes. He's clearly been, imo, more consistent than Lang, Newhouse, Sherrod and any of the other backups.
I'll just say that if Lang or Wells went down, i don't think the line would miss a beat with McDonald filling in. if he adds some strength in the next couple years he's going to be a good one.
He's the one guy on the line, outside of Bulaga, that has looked very solid to me this preseason. Even Sitton has looked a little suspect a few times.
September 02, 2011 at 12:21 am
IMO, it's not one snap, rather a body of work. He's not shown improvement. He is one of a list of people, all included by Ben above -- that just haven't shown much, but have been around long enough to show some glimmer or spark.
I would try to waive-injured Zombo, and sign him after he heals -- his injury will scare other teams away, plus he knows GB and GB knows him. It would allow Lattimore to sign and be evaluated, before putting him on PS when Zombo returns.
September 02, 2011 at 12:12 am
Regarding the execution of the second-team offensive line...
September 02, 2011 at 12:14 am
Looks like a contender all around. However, what about the idea of keeping Quinn Johnson given the heavy use of the inverted wishbone? While I could see Kuhn and Crabtree/Quarless serving as the FBs in that scheme and providing matchup problems for opposing DC's, I don't see that formation having the same running game 'thump' that it may with Johnson in there. I say that having missed a couple of preseason games, so if Johnson has played poorly please forgive my foolishness.
September 02, 2011 at 12:20 am
I think this is more an ideal benifit of having Quinn on the team. Im not so sure that having him gives us any more guarnteed "thump" than if we dont. Not that he sucks, I actually like Quinn Johnson alot. I just think we are so stressed at other positions that he becomes expendable givin his specialized skill set. We need guys that can play multiple spots....
September 02, 2011 at 12:32 am
I hope they keep QJ, but I can't say at whose expense. This part of the year always blows my mind, haha.
September 02, 2011 at 12:40 am
me too! I cant believe they are gonna make us wait till Saturday! lol I cant imagine how the players themselves feel!
September 02, 2011 at 12:26 am
Dang this is going to be tough.
Players I think can't be cut:
-Taylor
-So 'oto
-Bush
-House
I could see them cutting B. Jones in exchange for an OL or Gurley or Q. Johnson. It would please me if they kept the better starting special teams player over the better potential back up.
We've seen from last year Capers can patch it up.
September 02, 2011 at 12:35 am
IMO, Wynn looks in better shape this year as compared to last. His play seems improved as well. If Neal can stay healthy, then I think the dLine will be OK.
Which leaves the biggest weakness on the club: the oLine. How can they perform miracles at so many other positions, and not come up with an oLine?
This might seem a tad unorthodox -- ;) -- but I think I would start the 6th and 7th best lineman, and put Sitton and Bulaga in the backfield, to protect Rodgers.
September 02, 2011 at 12:43 am
Besides Grant or James Jones (we need both you knuckleheads) :), do you guys think that we have anyone that we would/should think about trading in order to shore up the OL?
September 02, 2011 at 12:52 am
Or the DB's? I really think that we need help there too! I mean come on! We are at cut time and talking like Bush is some great player and he is a lock! He should make the team based on all around contributions (mostly on Special Teams), but he is far from a lock as a corner.
September 02, 2011 at 12:45 am
If they always keep 9 OL I didn't see 7 worth keeping during this preseason...
Im on the fence with DJ Williams. His blocking was atrocious tonight. He was also easily mugged. I think Johnson stays Williams goes. Also think Schlauderaff stays.
Defense
Cardia Jackson stays House gone and Jennings over Underwood
September 02, 2011 at 01:13 am
I think I'm with you on prob letting DJ Williams go in order to solidify another position, not to keep QJ though. Tough call, but I think Taylor gets the nod over him, even though my brother disagrees with me. lol
And just curious, why Jennings over Underwood?
September 02, 2011 at 02:30 am
Just liked what I've seen of him this preseason. Underwood has the legal problems too, no?
I say qj gets it because they've been rolling with 3fbs for a few years I can't think they'd go down to 1. Especially since Kuhn has to play halfback at times.
September 02, 2011 at 01:16 am
Wow, this has gotten silly......
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 05:37 am
It always does.
September 02, 2011 at 07:44 am
I would trade Rodgers for Ricky Elmore.
September 02, 2011 at 08:12 pm
What a dumb thing to say... they are both already on the team. Duh.
September 02, 2011 at 01:36 am
Here's what I think TT will try to do:
2011 GNB Packer 53-Man Roster:
QB (3):
Rodgers*
Flynn*
G. Harrell
HB (3):
Starks*
Grant*
A. Green*
FB (2):
Kuhn*
Johnson
WR (6):
Jennings*
Driver*
Jones*
Nelson*
Cobb*
Gurley
TE (4):
Finley*
Quarless*
DJ Williams*
Taylor*
OL (9):
Bulaga*
Sitton*
Wells*
Sherrod*
Clifton*
Newhouse*
Lang*
Dietrich-Smith
Schlauderaff
DL (6):
Neal*
Raji*
Pickett*
H. Green*
Wilson*
Wynn
LB (8):
Matthews*
Bishop*
Hawk*
Walden*
Zombo*
Smith*
Francois
So'oto
CB (6):
Woodson*
T. Williams*
Shields*
House*
Bush*
P. Lee
S (3):
Collins*
Burnett*
Peprah*
K/P/LS (3):
Crosby*
Masthay*
Goode*
Practice Squad (8):
NT Ross
LB Lattimore
CB Gordy
S MD Jennings
OT Campbell
WR West
WR Taylor
RB Saine
They could try to sneak Schlauderaff onto the PS replacing Campbell in order to get Crabtree on the roster as well, but since that's a risky move I'm going with this.
September 03, 2011 at 08:37 am
No Way that Chastin West makes it to the practice squad.
Many teams are just waiting to pick over the bones of the Packers receiving corps. This kid is too talented for PS at this point.
They need to keep him on if they can.
September 02, 2011 at 01:40 am
I would keep Lattimore over Brad Jones Gordy over Pat Lee and MD Jennings over Underwood.
By keeping Francois who can play ILB and OLB, Brad Jones becomes expendable as Lattimore has more upside.
Pat Lee like Brad Jones just hasn't shown me the improvement you expect from guys with their experience. Time for some new blood in there.
I chose MD Jennings over Underwood because I believe Jennings can play some CB too if needed and he makes plays on STs. I don't hate Underwood as a player, I just like Jennings better.
Right now im struggling with keeping DJ Williams over Tori Gurley. Williams is just so slow he doesn't get any separation even from LBers. Gurley offers more on STs and more as a receiver right now. I doubt either guy makes it to our PS so its a tough call on who I would rather lose to another team.
September 02, 2011 at 02:32 am
Jones doesn't have much experience. Often injured.
September 02, 2011 at 11:39 am
He has played in this system, and he has practiced and knows the playbook.
He has definitely a lot more experience than any of the other guys in there.
September 02, 2011 at 08:10 am
I like your take on things. Keep Gordy littimore and Jennings. I think pat lee has more to offer than bush tho IMO.
And 5 TE is ridiculous. I agree that u keep gurley and drop Williams
September 02, 2011 at 02:06 am
One guy nobody is talking about is ILB DJ Smith. This guy is a sleeper and is going to shock people when he gets his chance. He doesn't miss a tackle and he makes a special teams impact as well. He's very instinctive. I feel like he will need a little work in coverage, but most LB's do. If Hawk or Bishop go down, we'll be completely fine with DJ Smith.
September 02, 2011 at 02:33 am
Smith is high motor but his size is small. Can he hold up? I liked what I saw from the other inside lb Jackson. He seemed to be around the ball all night.
September 02, 2011 at 07:10 am
I think that they were talking about him a lot tonight. I agree with everything else you said.
I'd like to see them find a way to keep Gurley around, but I just don't see who you cut. Going off Nagler's list, I might cut D.J. Williams. I'd say cut Underwood, but I don't see them dropping a D-back for a 6th receiver/11th WR/TE.
September 02, 2011 at 06:52 am
I like it Aaron, save for one thing. No Chastin West. Would be tough to see him go. Everything else looks great.
September 02, 2011 at 07:17 am
I kind of like Gurley over West for his height and special teams dimension. West got nothing last night playing against the Chiefs' 1s while Gurley pulled in a couple. I know his 97-yard TD was a big splash play, but it came against what, 2s, 3s? I wouldn't be shocked to see Brad Jones dropped, but he has versatility and experience, so I think he stays.
September 02, 2011 at 07:08 am
I agree with Aaron 53 except for one position/Player. I say they only keep 4 OLB and that spot goes to which ever position has the best special teams player. So maybe an extra WR or and extra DB. Brad Jones will not make the 53
September 02, 2011 at 07:51 am
Aaron, How do you see TT's 53 differing from yours?
TT keeps the best 53 so I agree w/ you re the 8 linemen. No other OL played themselves onto the squad. TT may bring in a cut player or trade for an OL or OLB. I know he loves his draft picks but he may have 11 next year. I think B. Jones is gone and I don't think they can wait 2 months for Zombo to heal.
Though I don't think he makes the roster Cardia Jackson helped his cause last night.
September 02, 2011 at 08:13 am
"TT keeps the best 53."
I don't believe this. If it were true, Graham Harrell wouldn't be on the list. Should he make the 53, it's out of future necessity, not talent.
September 02, 2011 at 09:53 am
It isn't an absolute but pretty close. It's the reason a lot of fans and media are predicting he could keep 5 TE's and 6 Wr's. One year he kept 10 DL when normally 8 is kept for a 4-3.
Sometimes it's keeping a player who he doesn't think will clear waivers so he can develop. But for the most part he keeps the best even if it makes him thin at another position.
September 02, 2011 at 08:38 am
Hey...if this is what YOU would do, wouldn't Jarrett Bush be listed under "safeties?":)
Seriously, though. Every year I am more curious about final cuts than the year before. Curious about FB, TE, Dbacks and WR. Great projection, Aaron. Bring on the regular season!
September 02, 2011 at 08:43 am
I think that if they keep 5 TEs, it means they don't really want to pay Finley. If they keep 4 or even (gasp) 3, they will make him a great offer. I just think that keeping 5 TEs when you'll only have 3 active at most on game day is silly.
September 02, 2011 at 09:08 am
Surprised everyone seems ok with keeping Harrell. He's a wasted roster spot IMO. Barring injury he'll never be a GDA. He's shown glimpses of being a serviceable backup but not much more. He's still PS eligible (I think). Stash him on there. If he's not or gets picked up find another guy like him just like last year. I'm really not a fan of keeping a third QB in general unless it's a HIGH upside guy and especially not anymore with the new 46 man GDA rule.
September 02, 2011 at 09:13 am
I'm with you. Harrell was a benefactor of a shortened off-season, first one I can recall in a while where MM/TT didn't bring in competition for the 3rd spot (likely to land on the PS). I don't think Harrell is garbage, but I don't believe he's a serviceable backup now or in the future.
I don't have an answer, but if MM/TT are true to their, 'best 53 on the roster' mantra then there's no way Gurley, Gordy, Lattimore or West (to name a few) get cut from the bubble before Harrell.
September 02, 2011 at 09:20 am
The conventional wisdom is that Harrell will not make it to the practice squad. To me, Harrell looked decent last night, while Flynn had a horrible night. And the WRs just disappeared. Anyway, you keep Harrell for next year as your back-up, unless you relish the idea of spending a high draft pick next year to get Rodgers a back-up.
September 02, 2011 at 09:24 am
Half of the league won't carry a 3rd QB, and most other franchises have their back-up (which Harrell isn't yet). Every team is making difficult cuts and it's just hard to fathom any franchise making an opening on their 53 for Harrell when he won't know their offense or personnel. Why not expose him to waivers? Will he really take a snap this year? You don't believe they will bring competition in next year for him regardless if Flynn leaves?
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 09:39 am
I just like how GB is trying to grow QBs the old fashioned way. Has Harrell been lights out? Hardly. Has he improved since last year? Absolutely. And that's w/o any offseason work, including MMs QB school.
Harrell looks like Matt Flynn did after two summers - in other words, on schedule.
September 02, 2011 at 09:47 am
I'm not faulting the philosophy and they guy is clearly understanding the system. He seems like a bright kid and I'm sure another season allows him to know the offense inside and out. I'm indifferent to his stats, both good and bad. Admittedly, it would be ideal to see him get some time with the 1's and some more time in general.
I still don't see him driving the ball with any velocity, especially beyond 15 yds or anywhere near the hashes. He needs receivers in front of him and can't drop a pass in the middle 1/3rd. I'm not holding him to a starters standards (let alone Rodgers) but he's not even sniffing Matt Flynn's ability in those areas and I believe Flynn is a limited starter.
If he sticks, I hope he grows. I just can't see the upside, and that's only evaluating him as a back-up. Just my 2 cents.
September 02, 2011 at 10:27 am
i'm sorry but I can't understand the love thrown at QJ. If he was such a good crusher in the run game, how come we still need to pass on 3& 3? Potential doesn't win games, performance does!
September 02, 2011 at 12:44 pm
I agree. Three years ago, Quinn Johnson was drafted to be the eventual starter at fullback. Three years later, he's still stuck behind John Kuhn on the depth chart. I don't see him making the team just because of this.
September 02, 2011 at 05:32 pm
We've been getting the term "road grader" jammed down our throats with regards to qj. Only problem is... He hasn't proven to be that in his time here. Even if he was, I don't know that that is needed in this pass first offense. Sure it would be nice to have a guy like that around if he could infact do as advertised, but we only have 53 men. He does not deserve to eat up a roster spot on this team
September 02, 2011 at 12:19 pm
-House to IR---Gordy to 53
-8 OLinemen and 5 TE's? I get that the OLine back-ups suck for the most part, but the TT needs to pick up another player or two off the wire for depth there.
-Harrell really hasn't earned a spot, especially w/his ball control issues. So, there's another option if you have to keep ALL the TE's, Aaron.
---Also, with So'oto's emergence do they hold a spot for Zombo? I hope so.
-Here's your shocker: Trade James Jones and keep one (or both w/ a Harrell cut) of West and Gurley.
September 02, 2011 at 01:16 pm
How do you trade James Jones if he was just a free agent and no one but GB would pay him the contract he just signed?
Okay, maybe the Vikings would, they're that stupid.
September 02, 2011 at 12:31 pm
Great list Aaron.
I'm assuming you have EDS filling in at RG if anything happens to Sitton, else the other OL positions seem to be covered even with just 8.
September 02, 2011 at 01:20 pm
Whatever happens with the 53, here's a little perspective...
Listening to Sports talk radio out here and the Seahawks have been less than impressed with their 1st round pick RT James Carpenter, so now there's a full fledged battle for the 'STARTING' RT spot between Carpenter and... wait for it... BRENO GIACOMINI!!! That's right folks. BRENO! So whatever happens with our 53, I feel lucky that we have the depth and talent that we do to choose from... DAMN LUCKY.
Oh, and I give Lee's spot to West. 6 WR's 9 DB's.
GBP 4 LIFE
September 02, 2011 at 05:05 pm
BRENO! BRENO! BRENO!
September 02, 2011 at 02:01 pm
Only 8 offensive linemen?
PackerAaron
September 02, 2011 at 02:37 pm
As I wrote, not what I think they'll do - what I would do. Me, I'd try to stash Schlauderaff on the PS. I doubt they do that. But as someone posted previously in this thread, its hard to find 7 lineman worth keeping in this bunch, let alone 9.
September 02, 2011 at 10:09 pm
I know what you wrote, and thus my question. You would risk going with only 8 OL? You have to have a backup center. With the starting 5, that's six guys. Now you only have two players to back up 4 positions. Beyond risky.
PackerAaron
September 03, 2011 at 07:52 am
Not at all. EDS plays center and both guard positions. Newhouse and Sherrod back up the tackles. I just don't see the point of keeping someone who would most likely remain inactive on gameday when they could easily sit on the practice squad to be called up if needed.
September 02, 2011 at 02:24 pm
i think harrell stays because flynn may go next year. i think gurley stays and i think crabtree goes.
September 02, 2011 at 03:13 pm
Brad Jones has to stay at least until Zombo is back, and why would we need 6 receivers when we have flexible tight ends that are more talented than Gurley or West? Finley, Quarless, Williams and Taylor can all split out wide. I like the list as constructed.
September 02, 2011 at 03:16 pm
Possibly Underwood out, because of off-field problems, for another lineman but that's it.
September 02, 2011 at 04:29 pm
I think other teams gm's would be wise to read this string. Perhaps loose lips sink practice squad dreams.
September 02, 2011 at 07:04 pm
Hate to say it, but Crabtree should get the axe before West, Gurley, or a utility O-lineman.
He's a hell of a character, but without twitter, he'd probably already have been cut.
Keeping 5 tight ends on this roster is nonsensical.
September 02, 2011 at 08:15 pm
Yep, pretty sure Ted is monitoring who's popular on twitter. How else would he know who to keep and who to cut.
September 03, 2011 at 11:21 am
Crabtree does things no one else on the team can do. Period. No way he gets cut, absolutely no way.