Hello Wisconsin: Packers Remain Consistently Inconsistent
Matt LaFleur needs to find a way to get the most out of his team with greater consistency.
By TimBackes

If there’s anything that remains consistent about the Packers of the last several years, it’s that it can be impossible to predict what version of the team you’re going to get in any given week.
The 2025 Packers are no example. Despite having shown early signs at the beginning of the year of being a well-balanced juggernaut, the team has fallen back into old habits of killing themselves with mistakes and playing down to the level of their competition. And yes, many of these trends have existed throughout the Matt LaFleur era.
Now, you’re not going to hear me call for LaFleur’s job in this column. I’m definitely not there yet. But it is very clear that he has some work to do, and that he has played a major role (perhaps the largest role) in the places where the team has fallen short this season.
I saw a discussion online this week about whether the Packers would make any moves at the trade deadline. This isn’t something they frequently do, but even then, this was one year where I actually found myself thinking no, the problem isn’t necessarily with the personnel on the field (though they absolutely need more strength at the corner position), but rather with the mentality of the team at the moment.
For one, LaFleur seems to be unaware that his quarterback is good. Watching the Packers offense on Sunday, it was like LaFleur was forcing Jordan Love to play with one arm tied behind his back.
As I wrote on BlueSky, it’s understandable to want to establish the run; Josh Jacobs is a great back and was the engine of the offense in 2024. But it’s 2025, and Jordan Love has become probably the team’s best offensive player. It’s time for the offense to flow through him, and that means accepting that there may be a couple boneheaded decisions per game to go along with the brilliance we see of his in the downfield passing game.
But it’s not just LaFleur who is maddeningly inconsistent; the players themselves are also not consistently making plays. The run defense performed a pretty impressive disappearing act for most of the game, as the Panthers ground out long drives to minimize the Packers’ possessions. Pass rush was virtually nonexistent, and even if it was present, it wouldn’t have mattered much given the way the Panthers were able to run the ball.
On the opposite side of the ball, there’s barely any consistency in play (or personnel) along the offensive line. I’ll never for the life of me understand why the Packers thought it was a good idea to take an all pro left guard and turn him into a mediocre center. Multiple Carolina rushers came untouched through the A gap–something that should just never, ever happen.
Love himself obviously needed to play better than he did in the late game, though part of me feels his interception (and his near second) were understandable given the frustrating game plan put into place. After absolutely carving up the Steelers, Love was never really allowed to open up, and it was the downfield passing that really seemed to be working for the Packers. It wouldn’t be surprising if Love was feeling a need to force the ball in tough circumstances simply because he was hamstrung so much by his play caller. Now, that’s still not an excuse for bad decision making, but it wouldn’t at all surprise me if those two things were intertwined.
It was just… ugly. And it came a week after a fairly convincing victory on the road against a pretty good Steelers team. And this is who the Packers continue to be; they oscillate back and forth depending on who they’re playing.
The “young team” excuse will surely be trotted out, but these guys are professionals. They have to be able to get up for every game every week. And LaFleur is no longer a rookie coach; he’s in his seventh year and has experienced a lot in this league.
The team has to be better, and they have to be more consistent. The effort from essentially all parties on Sunday was pathetic.
And now… a date with the defending champions.
Wisconsin Beer of the Week

This week: a true throwback!
In 2015, I went to the now-defunct Brenner Brewing Company for a release of its Halloween beer, an imperial stout called Witchcraft. Supplies were limited; each customer was allowed to purchase a single four-pack, and there was a line. But I managed to secure one.
The brewery itself was… interesting. It didn’t necessarily have the best reputation in the Milwaukee brewing scene. They had one really outstanding beer, an IPA called City Fox, which to this day remains one of my favorite IPAs I’ve had from a Milwaukee brewery. But beyond that, they never really created anything noteworthy… other than Witchcraft.
That’s one of the things that makes Witchcraft such a unicorn of a beer. A brewery that is otherwise essentially a footnote in Milwaukee’s craft brewing scene at this point created something that ranks among the best beers I’ve ever had. The beer was so good that I figured I’d save my last bottle for a special occasion.
Well, special occasions came and went. In 2018 I had one last bottle remaining, and my wife and I took it to the hospital to celebrate the birth of our first son. However, once he was born, my wife quickly realized that the absolute last thing she wanted was very high ABV barrel aged beer. So we decided to save it for another special occasion.
Then it just sort of… sat. In our cellar, in our beer fridge. This particular style of beer can go a very long time without being opened, and the wax seal added some preservation.
Finally, when I came across it again a couple years ago, I decided we would wait until the 10-year anniversary of the beer to finally crack it open. And that’s exactly what we did.
On Halloween Night, I cut off the wax seal, cracked the beer open, crossed my fingers, and poured it evenly into two glasses. It maintained a very nice carbonation, and it was still very molasses forward, with plenty of that bourbon flavor still there. While there were signs that the beer was past its peak, it definitely was still an outstanding beer. I’ve had a lot of great barrel-aged stouts from local breweries, but I’m not sure I’ve ever had one with a taste or mouthfeel quite like this. To this day, 10 years after its release, Witchcraft holds up as a true Milwaukee great, oddly enough from a brewery that generally failed to achieve excellence.
Here’s the description, if you’re interested. It weighs in at 13.5% ABV and 70 IBU.
“With the warmth behind us and cold ahead, the inaugural batch of WItchcraft was brewed under the harvest moon of 2014. This beer prepares you for the annual descent into darkness. Nine malt varieties, molasses, honey, and Anodyne coffee. Aged for one year in bourbon barrels and virgin Missouri oak barrels. The result is nothing short of perfection.”
Do the Packers have what it takes to beat the Eagles?
It’s almost impossible to know which Packer team is going to show up against Philadelphia on Monday night. It’s hard to believe homefield advantage will make much of a difference, given what we just saw against Carolina on Sunday. But hopefully the Panthers stinker at least lights a fire under this team and has them ready to go for primetime football against the defending champions. It'll be harder without Tucker Kraft, but great teams have to be able to overcome these sorts of backbreaking injuries.
For their part, the Eagles are coming in well rested off their bye week, plus one extra day. The Packers are going to have to deal with a wide range of weapons on that Philly offense. While Saquon Barkley isn’t having the MVP caliber season he did a year ago, he did just have his best performance of the season in the Eagles’ last game, and he’s still a threat for an explosive play at just about any time of the game. After the trouble the Packers had against a bad Carolina offensive line with stopping the run, they’re going to need to be on full alert on Monday night.
The defense is also going to have its hands full with the Eagles’ passing game. Jalen Hurts may be having his finest season throwing the football: 15 touchdowns to a single interception with a 70.2 percent completion percentage. AJ Brown is expected to be back in the lineup, though at the time of me writing this (Wednesday) it remains to be seen whether he will be back from injury. If so, he’s a dynamic, big-bodied receiver that could bully some of the Packers’ defensive backs. Devonta Smith is a highly capable #2 who has had a couple explosive games already this season.
The Packers were unable to topple the Eagles in two different contests last year. They played them close in week one, and simply weren’t up to the task in the playoffs. The Packers are a better team (ostensibly) than they were a season ago, but it’s impossible to trust them given what we’ve seen so far this season.
Green Bay is certainly capable of winning this football game. The question really comes down to whether they have the discipline to learn from their most recent game and play a complete football game for once.
We really look at turnovers different than we once did
I’ve been spending a fair amount of time going through old NFL highlights recently just for nostalgia’s sake. For example, I was looking at one compilation of the 1999 St. Louis Rams “Greatest Show on Turf” season, which was a lot of fun. But going through that year, something that really struck me was the number of turnovers.
In 1999, the Rams had a whopping 31 turnovers. That would have been second most in the league in 2024 (34 was the most), but in 1999, it fell somewhere in the middle of the pack. THat year, the Chicago Bears led the league with 48 (!) turnovers–an average of three per game! Meanwhile, the Philadelphia Eagles had the fewest with 17. There were 10 teams with 17 or fewer in 2024!
This speaks volumes to how much offense has changed around the league. Turnovers were once just considered to be an inevitable part of the game. One of the greatest offenses of all time, that 1999 Rams team, turned the ball about twice per game. These days, that number would likely lead to firings and benchings.
It’s really in the passing game that those turnovers have drastically decreased. While fumble numbers have remained relatively consistent (any decrease there is also due to decreased quarterback fumbles), interception numbers have plummeted. Quarterbacks are being more careful with the football, but offenses are also relying much more on short passing games and one- or two-read schemes that rely on routes getting guys open quickly. Long-developing routes and multi-player reads are nowhere near as prevalent as they once were, and so the risky throws are also fewer and farther between.
This increased scarcity in turnovers has that feedback loop of making teams even more risk averse. If fewer turnovers are happening, that means every single turnover that DOES happen is even more consequential. While turnovers have always had a significant correlation with the outcome of the game, that’s even truer than it ever has been considering it takes fewer takeaways than ever to win the turnover margin.
In that aforementioned 1999 season with the Greatest Show on Turf, all but six of the top 25 quarterbacks in the league by touchdown pass threw double digit interceptions. Brett Favre, Drew Bledsoe, Jake Plummer, Kerry Collins, Jim Harbaugh, Doug Pederson, and Brian Griese all threw at least as many picks as touchdowns!
Compare that to 25 years later in 2024. Of those top 25 quarterbacks by touchdown pass, more than half did NOT throw double digit interceptions.
So, the game has changed noticeably. It’s one of those things you KNOW, but you don’t quite realize just how much until you’re looking back at old highlights, see great offenses making all kinds of mistakes, and the announcers don’t really make that big of a deal of it.
Around the NFC North
As always, it’s time to go around the NFC North.
- The CHICAGO BEARS will take any victories they can get, though it might be hard to feel great about a victory in which your defense is absolutely shredded by a 40 year old quarterback. Still, the Bears continue to take steps forward, and now more than halfway through the season still find themselves in realistic contention for a wild card berth. Coaching truly can make a difference, it turns out.
- The DETROIT LIONS wasted an opportunity to gain some ground on the Packers by falling at home to a Vikings team quarterbacked by JJ McCarthy. Ironically, right before the game, the team on Fox NFL Sunday unanimously agreed the Lions were the NFC North’s best team and eventual division champions. Just goes to show once again that my theory about the 2025 season is correct: there are actually no truly great teams, and this year’s champions will just end up being whichever decent team manages to string together three or four good games in a row.
- The MINNESOTA VIKINGS continue their up and down season with a win over the Lions, and now suddenly talk of playoffs is back on the menu despite them currently being in the basement of the division. But with the North’s records all so tightly grouped together, anything is possible. Kevin O’Connell has proven he can make a three course dinner with table scraps at the quarterback position, so as long as Brian Flores’s defense can hold up and the team’s bevy of skill position players can help out, they’re going to be in a lot of games. The question just comes down to whether the quarterback can make enough plays to get them victories. On Sunday, he did just that.
Mr. Backes’s “This or That”
Every day I put a different “this or that” poll up on my whiteboard and have students leave tallies throughout the day. I then compile this information and post it here for laughs.
Here’s what we’ve seen over the last week:
- Six Flags defeated Noah’s Ark
- Coffee defeated Tea
- Sour patch defeated Skittles
- Sophocles defeated Shakespeare (we’re working on a unit featuring Oedipus Rex and a Shakespearean tragedy of students’ choice)
Week 10 NFL Picks
Hard to know what version of the Packers we get, but if anything has been consistent about Matt LaFleur’s teams, it’s that they rarely win on the road against strong competition. Give me Philly.
Eagles 30, Packers 20
The whole slate:
BRONCOS over Raiders
COLTS over Falcons
BROWNS over Jets
PANTHERS over Saints
PATRIOTS over Bucs
RAVENS over Vikings
BILLS over Dolphins
BEARS over Giants
TEXANS over Jaguars
SEAHAWKS over Cardinals
LIONS over Commanders
RAMS over 49ers
CHARGERS over Steelers
EAGLES over Packers
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Tim Backes is a lifelong Packer fan and a contributor to CheeseheadTV. Follow him on Twitter @timbackes for his Packer takes, random musings and Untappd beer check-ins.
__________________________




Comments (35)
KenEllis
November 06, 2025 at 06:49 am
So the author writes "... the team has fallen back into old habits of killing themselves with mistakes and playing down to the level of their competition. And yes, many of these trends have existed throughout the Matt LaFleur era ... LaFleur seems to be unaware that his quarterback is good. Watching the Packers offense on Sunday, it was like LaFleur was forcing Jordan Love to play with one arm tied behind his back ... LaFleur is no longer a rookie coach; he’s in his seventh year and has experienced a lot in this league ...The team has to be better, and they have to be more consistent. The effort from essentially all parties on Sunday was pathetic ... (and LaFleuer) has played a major role (perhaps the largest role) in the places where the team has fallen short this season."
And what does the author conclude from his damning statements above?
"you’re not going to hear me call for LaFleur’s job in this column".
I look forward to the next column detailing the litany of Special Teams Coordinator Bisaccia's failures ... followed by an explanation of why Rich not only does not need to be fired but actually deserved the promotion LaFleur gave him last January.
Coldworld
November 06, 2025 at 07:12 am
Perhaps a supplement dealing looking into why we kept Butkus after failing to improve run blocking and what Stenavich has really contributed to the offense.
That doesn’t leave much beyond Haffley. Perhaps it is time to come off the fence and ask what really suggests LaFleur is a credible Head Coach.
stockholder
November 06, 2025 at 07:29 am
Go try some New Holland Beer.
I think you could judge beer better than MLF.
TKWorldWide
November 06, 2025 at 06:59 am
Inconsistent, just like the rest of the NFL.
The Packers are the only team we scrutinize so closely, so it’s easy to assume that no other team has the problems GB has, or the grass is greener for almost every other franchise.
T7Steve
November 06, 2025 at 07:10 am
It's funny, I was thinking the same way a couple days ago. Every team (I was watching some interviews with some Steelers and Mike Tomlin) says that they just have to quit beating themselves.
TKWorldWide
November 06, 2025 at 08:36 am
Gr8 minds, brother!
T7Steve
November 06, 2025 at 07:06 am
Tim, you have me confused on your reasoning.
"Hard to know what version of the Packers we get, but if anything has been consistent about Matt LaFleur’s teams, it’s that they rarely win on the road against strong competition. Give me Philly."
Did you forget that they're playing in Green Bay? I think you even mentioned it at the start of your column. LOL
Please give me a score for a home game.
stockholder
November 06, 2025 at 07:11 am
I'm not calling for MLF to be replaced either.
But I am calling for Jenkins to be replaced.
Consistency just won't happen until Jenkins
is back to his old position.
I hate to point at him or his smarts. But---
Next is Doubs-
Sorry- but this is like MVS, is are #1 Wr now.
I get he's apple of Love's eye.
But the YAC is my point.
Kraft could run after the catch.
It's not catch and fall down.
Run to daylight please.
Next is the DL.
Move the Beef up.
If they can't play DT.
Move them to DE.
Wear down their OL.
We paid Gary and Parsons per Rush.
And we have 2 very fast LBs.
It's up to Love now.
And I'll bet he'll crash
until you fix this OL.
TKWorldWide
November 06, 2025 at 06:16 pm
Who do you mean with “if they can’t play DT. Move them to DE.”
Where do Rashan, Micah, Kingsley, Barryn, and eventually LVN go? Or do you mean work them into the rotation at DE? But wouldn’t that still mean less snaps for the main guys?
Guam
November 06, 2025 at 07:30 am
The author thinks Elgton Jenkins is a mediocre center. I disagree.
Those A gap blitzes that Carolina worked so effectively were not Jenkins' fault. They were a scheme and coaching failure. It is pretty clear from the game film that Jenkins was supposed to slide left or right and double team a DT in the pass blocking scheme (after snapping the ball Jenkins immediately slides to the double team without even looking at A gap protection). He did not have responsibility for the A gap. No one did. Carolina saw this scheme flaw and designed a delayed linebacker blitz to take advantage of it.
What I really don't understand is what was the coaching staff thinking? After the first A gap blitz by Carolina, why wasn't the protection scheme altered to provide A gap coverage? Did the Packer coaching staff think Carolina wouldn't run that blitz again after being highly successful with it the first time??? Butkus should have immediately told Jenkins to hold in the A gap for a count and check the middle linebacker before sliding to a double team. A simple adjustment to the protection scheme that would have stopped those blitzes but it never happened.
Jenkins was doing what he was assigned to do. The protection scheme failure was not his fault. Those A gap blitzes are squarely on the coaching staff. Both for the initial assignment and for the incomprehensible lack of in-game adjustments.
T7Steve
November 06, 2025 at 07:53 am
Well put. I thought maybe a back running up the middle on a play action would have helped cure that too.
Guam
November 06, 2025 at 09:00 am
Absolutely. Or invite the blitz and throw into the vacated area to a TE. There are lots of antidotes but the Packer coaching staff seemed to use none of them. In-game adjustment problems again. A LaFleur staple.
TXCHEESE
November 06, 2025 at 08:58 am
We can't be certain he was doing what he was assigned to unless this was communicated to the public somehow. Not defending Buttkiss, because I think he lacks what this OL needs as far as coaching, but I can't declare Jenkins wasn't supposed to be protecting the A gap.
Guam
November 06, 2025 at 09:06 am
I agree there can be no certainty. However Jenkins' moves after snapping the ball are pretty definitive. He never hesitated in his slide or even looked at the A gap. That had all the earmarks of an assigned blocking scheme. And wouldn't you think after the first blitz Jenkins would be paying more attention to the A gap if that was his assignment? Jenkins was an all-pro guard - he didn't become an assignment unsure idiot after switching to center.
While I can't be 100% sure, this has all the earmarks of a coaching failure, not an execution failure.
Bitternotsour
November 06, 2025 at 06:19 pm
is that an indicator that he missed the call, after all the center makes the line calls. a lot to unpack, so to speak
Guam
November 07, 2025 at 07:30 am
Hard to call a protection scheme they hadn't planned for and the Packer coaching staff clearly was not prepared for the A gap blitz by Carolina. And that's okay - sometimes the opposing DC's get it right. But to make no adjustments later in the game........that I don't understand.
LambeauPlain
November 06, 2025 at 09:14 am
Interesting analysis.
It assuages some of my concerns about Jenkins: Is he playing hurt or, like Nijman two years ago, playing his way off the Packers by taking his foot off the accelerator? Is his attitude affecting his behavior after being rebuffed for a reworked contract?
It may simply be what I believe: A below average OL coaching battery who, like their HC, are slow to adjust in games and are not able to utilize individual player strengths to construct a synergistic, cohesive unit.
LaFleur is a status quo coach...especially when it comes to his coaching personnel. He does not seem to hold them accountable. Making difficult personnel decisions is not fun, but so very necessary.
And it may be he has been encouraged to avoid these difficult decisions. Has he been held accountable for performance during his tenure? He has been reporting to the Team President instead of an actual General Manager and I believe LaFleur has been cut too much slack for poor performance.
I realize making coaching personnel changes at midseason is unlikely. Can the HC at least adjust? Make Stenovich focus like a laser on the OL operation and remove most of the OC responsibilities? Many of Stenovich's OC responsibilities, with LaFleur as the real OC, are mostly redundant anyway.
Coldworld
November 06, 2025 at 09:15 am
Since your earlier post about the movement of Jenkins, Guam, I too went back and looked. I have to agree. It is an immediate movement and very purposeful. It looks clearly like he was executing what he believed was a very specific assignment.
That begs the questions of was Jenkins playing the right assignment? If not, who was supposed to fill the vacated gap? I think both occurred after Banks left, so was that lack of back up preparation? As you say, if it was, why was it called again or not corrected after such a dramatic result?
Just the most visible mess among a lot of seeming uncoordinated play, particularly after Banks left. How long do they need to prepare these guys? Is it a backwash of having players back up multiple positions and resulting preparation work? It certainly seems to be rooted in coaching and coaches decisions both current and going back to the summer.
Guam
November 06, 2025 at 09:58 am
Lots of good questions CW. I wish the Packer offensive coaching staff had some answers.
jlc1
November 06, 2025 at 09:44 am
Unless protection schemes, like the rest of the play, have options in execution based on what the defense shows. Which is probably the case.
Guam
November 06, 2025 at 09:56 am
I suspect the coaching staff had called for a quick pass and was okay with a delayed A gap blitz assuming the pass would come out before the blitz got home. However Carolina was playing the short passes very aggressively and the quick route wasn't open leaving Love vulnerable to the blitz. That was all okay for the first blitz, but why try the same thing again and again and expect a different result? Change the play or the protection scheme. In-game adjustments.
NFLfan
November 06, 2025 at 08:58 am
This is likely the first year MLF knows he is being evaluated. His problems are not new but he has not been held accountable. An owner would have had difficulty accepting the team's inconsistency, especially when it related to laziness, lack of preparation, looking flat, etc. That is disrespect and it's on the coach.
I don't think fans mind losing in a hard-fought battle, it's the 'I can't seem to get myself nor my guys prepared and energized for an inferior team-just like the Browns.' Why can't Matt comprehend that the Panthers had something to prove after being recently embarrassed.
LambeauPlain
November 06, 2025 at 09:33 am
We will see how LaFleur's 7th season ends up. I believe this is a talented team.
Yet the most important operation on the team after QB, the OL, is the problem child of the team and they are still an undisciplined, incohesive, injury ridden, Jeckle and Hyde group. If the OL's second half of the season is not vastly improved, the playoffs will slip away.
In his first 3 years, LaFleur was 39-10 and 2-3 in the playoffs. In his second 3 years, LaFleur is 27-24, 1-2 playoffs. Very average.
The trend is not LaFleur's friend. The next 9 games are the most important of his coaching career.
ricky
November 06, 2025 at 09:55 am
About LaFleur. He has been with the team seven years, and still makes the same mistakes. No adjustments as the game progresses. Being inconsistent with his choice of coaches (keeping Barry around when it was obvious to everyone else he was not the answer). Promoting Adam Stenavich to OC, where the "Peter Principle" (a person rises to the level of their incompetence) kicked in. An excellent OL coach, a non-entity as an OC.
LaFleur came from the Titans, where he pursued a "run first" offense. With Rodgers, he had no choice, as the QB could simply audible out of a run to a pass if he felt like it. Now, he is getting stubborn, doing the same thing and hoping for different results.
As far as moving Jenkins to center, remember, the hype was he would be "all world" at that position, and help solidify the line, Who's idea was this? Was it Butkus? Stenavich? Or a combination of these two that persuaded Gutekunst to make that move?
Finally, the defense had a "players only" meeting to address a problem with the younger guys, who seemed more interested in playing video games rather than watching game film or putting in extra time in the weight room. This should be the area where the position coaches and HC and OC step in and take charge.
It is too early to call for a coaching change. But some adjustments to his approach to the game would be
welcome.
jannesbjornson
November 06, 2025 at 10:48 am
Correct, the coaching evaluation should have set the sparks on the wheel after barely leaving a 1-5 mark within the Norris. The Inverse function effect and disharmony along the O line points up the ladder to the Man.
NFLfan
November 06, 2025 at 10:59 am
I suggest fans listen to this week's conversation between Andy H and Justis M. Justis suggests Matt may be offered a lucrative college coaching job and may spin his 'departure' as a positive move. LSU pays Brian Kelly 10 Million/yr.
Apparently college coaches are no longer burdened with recruiting. According to Justis, Matt could re-emerge in the NFL after several years as opposed to being fired in the NFL and having to take a Coordinator position.
Bitternotsour
November 06, 2025 at 02:49 pm
to think for a moment he'd be out of an NFL job for slightly longer than a heartbeat is ridiculous. if he loses this job, another high-profile job will be waiting for him, it will just be a matter of if he wants a year off before he coaches again.
HarryHodag
November 06, 2025 at 11:23 am
Couple of items this week target the Packers offensive line as the prime culprit for the inconsistency.
Milwaukee J-S questioned whether moving Jenkins to center made the line better or worse.
Dan Orlovsky looked at numbers(gag) showing only one Packers offensive lineman in what would be considered "above average" and the rest in the 'average' category. He said the run game has largely failed because the line simply isn't opening holes for Josh Jacobs. He also said the offense now is largely one dimensional and much easier to defense against.
I would also say the defensive line and linebackers are mediocre at this point, Parsons excepted. Rashan Gary should be producing monster numbers and he's not. The interior guys are not helping either. The loss of Kenny Clark here is a factor.
No Super Bowl team here unless things improve quickly. Nine games to go and the likely outcome over those games is 4-5 and out of the playoffs.
LambeauPlain
November 06, 2025 at 11:55 am
Cooper and Walker are "mediocre"? They are the best tandem the Packers have had in decades.
DL I agree is mediocre, sans Parsons...also Wyatt who's a real force inside but seems he is still working through his injury. He was far more effective prior to it.
Alberta_Packer
November 06, 2025 at 12:12 pm
We've been watching a 3+ years film loop with LaFleur. Some type of intervention is necessary - whether it be a change of players(s), coach(s) and/management. Otherwise more of the same for ...?
WD
November 06, 2025 at 12:46 pm
I would like to see the Packers consider playing Tyron Hopper at Middle Linebacker. He has a real head hunter mentality as evidenced on special teams. I think this is what our defense is lacking....the killer instinct.
Spock
November 06, 2025 at 03:10 pm
Tim, I know you are an English teacher so I'm confused by this, "...it’s that it can be impossible to predict what version of the team you’re going to get in any given week. The 2025 Packers are NO example."
I would think the Packers most definitely ARE an example of an unpredictable team.
Leatherhead
November 06, 2025 at 04:32 pm
75% of the time this team scores 27. They're undefeated when they hit this mark.
Starrbrite
November 06, 2025 at 09:46 pm
Yes—and I expected them to score 30 bs the Panthers.
CanPackFan
November 07, 2025 at 11:11 am
LaFleur has not grown or learned much as a HC in 6.5 years. He still makes the same mistakes as he did in year 1. We all know what they are. I feel bad for the talented players on this team that see their successes frittered away by horrendous game management. How can a younger man like himself be so resistant to change? Keeping subpar favorites on his coaching staff far too long had been a hallmark of his regime. Adaptation to change is essential towards survival - and ongoing success in the NFL. He's still a younger coach but his learning capabilities appear extremely stunted. He just doesn't have what is needed to adapt and survive as a HC.