Does HGH Work In The NFL?

Would using HGH actually help NFL players on the field?  Probably not. 

With the conclusion of the Super Bowl and before the hubbub of free agency and the draft, a certain bit of calm has fallen over the NFL.  At this point, the allegations of Peyton Manning’s use of HGH (and to the lesser extent digging up his old sexual abuse scandal) have been the highlight of a otherwise quiet couple of weeks.   Lest you think that this has absolutely nothing to do with the Packers, keep in mind Clay Matthews was also implicated by Al Jazeera.

While we all make the natural assumption that using HGH is bad, gives an unfair advantage to players who cheat, and overall sullies the profession of being an athlete, is any of that actually true?  Here’s what we actually know about human growth hormone usage in professional sports:

1.     No one knows if it actually works: Not completely surprising given how few professional athletes there are in general, coupled by the smaller number that use HGH (and get caught).  Medical researchers are at this point not sure if HGH would give athletes any competitive advantage on the field.  What we do know is that taking HGH lowers body fat and increases lean muscle mass but with no subsequent increase in muscle strength.  What that really means is that while athletes taking HGH may in fact have bigger muscles, they aren’t able to do anything more with those bigger muscles than they could before taking HGH. 

2.     It might not be that helpful to have more muscle mass: If you actually think about it, very few athletes in the NFL that have body builder physiques.  The NFL game has evolved to favor players who have sudden quickness over total maximum speed and body flexibility to change directions suddenly and absorb impacts.  None of these things require muscles on muscles and as a result there are plenty of talented football players who don’t look like Mr. Universe (see: all NFL players).  Compare that to football players in the 1980’s “dead ball” era who played in a game about winning in the trenches and running the football and you start to see why players like “the incredible bulk” Tony Mandarich (who admitted to using steroids, the precursor to HGH) existed.   

3.     It might help athletes recover faster: There is some evidence that shows HGH may increase the build up of connective tissue, and in particular the Mitchell report from the MLB stated that many baseball players used HGH for the perceived benefit of faster recovery from injuries.  While this may or may not be true (again no one knows), it doesn’t seem to make much of an advantage from a NFL player’s perspective.  First off the most devastating injuries for NFL players are knee injuries (ACL/PCL), broken bones (mostly in the foot) and torn muscles (biceps, shoulders).  Of those, HGH would have very little effect on broken bones (which has nothing to do with connective tissue) or torn ligaments (which basically never heal, which is why athletes usually use graft transplants) but HGH might help with torn muscles. 

4.     The NFL isn’t designed to benefit HGH use compared to other sports: By this I mean NFL rosters are so large that any significant injury is likely to land a player on IR, which effectively shuts the player down for the entire season.  Baseball in particular has the 15 and 60 day DL list but a NFL player does not have the option to return to play after being sent to IR (with the exception of the IR-designated to return tag, which is relatively new and not retroactive).  Add to that the NFL season is shorter than MLB season and it simply might not be possible to heal fast enough, even with HGH, to return to the field for NFL players. 

5.     HGH might actually lower athletic endurance: Interestingly, HGH levels are naturally high in some individuals, namely those suffering from a hormone disorder called acromegaly.  Research has shown that individuals with acromegaly have very low stamina and when their hormone levels are corrected their stamina actually increases.  This paradoxically might mean that athletes who take HGH may actually be hurting themselves on the field by lowering their endurance.   While NFL players don’t need to have fantastic stamina given the constant stoppage of play, I can’t imagine any NFL player would want to have less stamina. 

Overall, let me be the first to say I have zero clue whether or not HGH is a thing in the NFL.  It might be a rampant problem with everyone taking HGH or it might just be the few guys who have been caught.  I have no idea what NFL players presume HGH does for them or what reasons they would want to take HGH for.  All I am saying is that at this point, no one knows if HGH actually gives anyone a competitive advantage on the football field and the NFL is coincidentally designed to not favor HGH use compared to other sports. 

 

0 points
 

Comments (17)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
lou's picture

February 19, 2016 at 01:36 pm

The same questions were asked long ago about steriods (anavar - dianabol) and there is no doubt they significantly increased performance and recovery from injury times. When Barry Bonds was --38-42 and seldom got a pitch to hit, whenever he did it seemed to go over the fence. The negative of course is his hat size, chest size and shoe size went up which should scare anyone (head and feet growth at those ages), but there were too many others to count doing the same thing because it WORKED. If HGH has similar results and cannot be detected there have to be players experimenting with it. If the NFL comes up with a test for HGH the first one I would test would be Adrian Peterson, no one near 30 who tears an ACL comes back in 6 months looking like Gayle Sayers in his rookie year.

0 points
0
0
hobbes's picture

February 19, 2016 at 04:16 pm

It's hard to say if HGH and steroids have the same effect. Also going back to baseball, I feel like hitting a ball is a lot more defined and probably is effected by raw strength. While raw strength is important for run blocking and so forth, being fast and agile is probably more important.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

February 20, 2016 at 11:35 am

There were "skeptics" like yourself when it came to baseball, too. "I can see how steroids would help an Olympic weightlifter, but hitting a baseball is more of a skill thing..." Then "I could see how steroids would help guys like Sammy Sosa & Mark McGwire but pitching requires endurance & flexibility..."

If some guys use PEDs then everyone has to, if only to keep up.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

February 19, 2016 at 02:11 pm

Shorter version: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

February 19, 2016 at 07:19 pm

I'll admit. I chuckled.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

February 19, 2016 at 02:24 pm

To point 3, why do you focus just on "the most devastating" injuries. I feel like if HGH does help with recovery from injury, it would be most effective on the minor strains and sprains that all players with deal with daily.

0 points
0
0
hobbes's picture

February 19, 2016 at 04:19 pm

I had thought about talking a bit about minor injuries but I figured the article was getting long enough so I cut it out. My personal opinion on that would be that athletes have to weigh the risk of getting caught using HGH versus the perceived benefit of a faster recovery. In other words is it worth being caught using HGH for a muscle pull that would have healed normally in a couple weeks? Maybe I'm just being conservative but I would think athletes would only use HGH for devastating injuries.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

February 19, 2016 at 04:49 pm

I really disagree. Every player knows they're one injury, no matter how minor, away from potentially losing their spot. I think they'll do whatever it takes to stay on the field.

0 points
0
0
hobbes's picture

February 19, 2016 at 05:56 pm

They also know that they're one press release about cheating away from losing their spot as well. High profile players might get away with it but the vast majority of players know that if they get caught using HGH it's the end of their careers.

0 points
0
0
Evan's picture

February 19, 2016 at 06:23 pm

That's where the ego comes in.

0 points
0
0
Packer_Pete's picture

February 19, 2016 at 03:50 pm

Even if it shortens the recovery time it is a big help. But i'm hearing all the time that rookies and first year players have to bulk up, so I think your argument 2 isn't valid either...

0 points
0
0
hobbes's picture

February 19, 2016 at 04:24 pm

Sure they have to bulk up, but none of them turn into the stereotypically steroid body builder body type. Again it's more about functional strength in the NFL than an actual muscle mass.

0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

February 19, 2016 at 09:34 pm

This is like a high school term paper.

I give you a C+. -----Mostly for effort. (not even those in the know have a clue about HGH)

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

February 20, 2016 at 12:04 am

Not sure you were asked to grade let alone add a denigrating comment.

Point is to bring up subjects, for conversation among packer community with diverse levels of knowledge and interest. I think your University Dissertations and technical journals might satisfy your secret desires.

I appreciated perspective, learned some. I'm giving out A grades most of the off season. We got a long gap needs fillin. Thanks Hobbes.

0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

February 20, 2016 at 04:41 pm

Unfortunately, many people can talk & talk & talk and say very little.

You look to have also accomplished this ability.

0 points
0
0
holmesmd's picture

February 20, 2016 at 08:55 am

Pretty good layman's review of the subject! I'll make a few points:

1. It important to keep in mind that performance enhancement can be measured and described in many different ways. Just because it may not appear to make you run faster or lift more doesn't mean that there are not other benefits.

2. Bodybuilder & athletes use HGH to increase insulin sensitivity and protein synthesis. HGH actually accelerates collagen synthesis thus strengthening tendons and joint capsules. It takes exponentially longer to do this naturally. I believe that many athletes believe that they may actually avoid injury to these structures by supplementing HGH.

3. The IOC & every other regulating body in pro sports has banned HGH and considers it a PED. For that reason it's use should be avoided to escape sanctions.

4. I believe that exogenous supplementation is more expensive and less effective than increasing the body's natural secretion in HGH because of the violation of the hormonal feed back loop and the resultant elevations of Insulin Like Growth Factor (IGF-1). There are products composed of certain ratios of amino acids that profoundly raise natural secretion of HGH. This is more physiologic and avoids the risk and side effects of exogenous supplementation.

0 points
0
0
DanStoun's picture

November 27, 2020 at 10:37 am

I can confidently say that hgh works! At a certain time, I myself underwent a course of injection therapy, and I can say that age-related changes receded, I began to feel better, although I doubted a lot, read a lot of articles, for example https://hghtherapydoctor.us/testosterone/how-to-get-prescription-for-tes... , and in the end I made up my mind and never regretted it. Everyone wants to be strong and not grow old - and for this in our time there is a solution.

0 points
0
0