There Will Be More Pressure on the Packers Defense This Season

Packers fans have been frustrated by the performance of their defense over the last two seasons. The team has spent 12 of their last 13 first-round picks on defensive players and yet the defense was ranked 17th in points allowed and total yards allowed in 2022. The Pack finished with a disappointing 8-9 record and the defense’s play was one of the reasons for their losing record.

Last season, the Packers defense featured seven former first-round picks on the roster in cornerbacks Jaire Alexander and Eric Stokes, safety Darnell Savage, edge rusher Rashan Gary, inside linebacker Quay Walker and defensive linemen Kenny Clark and Devonte Wyatt. In 2022, Lukas Van Ness will make eight former first round picks on the defensive side of the ball. On paper, at least, Green Bay should have a very talented defense.

In 2022, the Packers defense will be relied upon even more than it was a year ago. The offense is undergoing significant changes and is likely to struggle a bit more, especially early in the season.

The most obvious reason is that for the first time in 15 years, Aaron Rodgers will not be the Packers quarterback. Jordan Love will get his first chance to be QB1 and while he’s been in the league three years, he has only started one NFL game and has thrown only 83 passes in his career. No doubt it will take Love some time to get up to speed.

In addition to an inexperienced quarterback, the team’s receiving corps is extremely talented but also green. No wide receiver on the Packers roster presently has more than one year of NFL experience. Even if GM Brian Gutekunst decides to add a veteran wideout before the season starts, that will still leave the receiver room with precious little NFL experience.

The Packers will also be relying on a pair of rookie tight ends to play a lot of snaps. Second round pick Luke Musgrave and third round selection Tucker Kraft are expected to get significant playing time. Both are talented but need time to adjust to the NFL game and learn a complicated position.

Josiah Deguara and Tyler Davis are the only experienced tight ends on the roster but neither has been a significant threat in the downfield passing game.

By relying on so many young players, the Packers offense is likely to make its share of mental errors especially early in the season. Going on 10-play, 80-yard drives is not as easy when a receiver runs the wrong pattern or isn’t on the same page as his quarterback.

That takes us back to the defense. Joe Barry’s unit allowed 371 points in 2022 while the offense scored 370. If the offense is less consistent, it will have to rely on the defense to not only stop opposing teams more frequently but to create turnovers and give the offense some short fields.

The encouraging news is that the defense did create more turnovers and played better late in the season. With their backs against the wall at 4-8, the Pack went on a four-game winning streak in December and January in part because the defense created more turnovers. During the win streak, the Packers defense created 12 turnovers which placed the team at a plus-nine in that category over that time.

Part of the reason was that Barry made adjustments to the way he played the game. The team played fewer soft zones and allowed defensive backs to press receivers more often at the line of scrimmage. He also changed the frequency of his blitzes and mixed up the types of blitzes he called.

The addition of Van Ness and the return of Gary should help fortify the pass rush which struggled after Gary went down in Week 9. Preston Smith, Gary, Kingsley Enagbare and Van Ness should give the team talent and depth on the edge and the team also drafted Colby Wooden and Karl Brooks who may eventually be able to give the team more pressure from the interior line.

It will be vital that Barry designs a defense that plays to the strengths of what is viewed as a very talented roster on defense that hasn’t quite lived up to its potential on the field.

If the Packers hope to be competitive as they transition to a new quarterback and a younger roster this season, then the defense, which should feature eight former first-round picks on the roster, needs to play better starting in Week 1.

You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers

NFL Categories: 
6 points
 

Comments (86)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
BirdDogUni's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:17 pm

"Packer's fans have been frustrated by the performance of their defense over the last two seasons."

FTFY

"Packer's fans have been frustrated by the performance of their defense over the last two decades."

10 points
12
2
LambeauPlain's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:17 pm

Not much of a legacy with Capers, Pettine, Barry. Capers cost MM a SB or two. Had high hopes for Pettine, who played the run like it was a free play for the opponent.

I had even higher hopes thinking about Leonard as DC.

I had no hopes for Barry. Unfortunately he has been meeting those expectations.

Maybe Barry is coachable. IDK

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:22 pm

The high picks should have gone to the Offense and let them control the clock and put the nut in the Endzone. The Defensive players were either poor selections, or over-drafted. Finesse style schemes lead to failure at crunch time.

0 points
2
2
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 11, 2023 at 03:15 pm

No. MVP's who collapse in crunch time lead to failure in crunch time.

1 points
3
2
jannes bjornson's picture

May 11, 2023 at 05:05 pm

3rd & 8, stop the run, force the punt and return the ball to the offense. This critical down and Fail after the Special Teams allowed 6pts on the blocked punt. Still looking for your heroes.

0 points
1
1
Lphill's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:25 pm

the fate of the Packers in Jordan Love's first season is in the hands of Joe Barry, not very reassuring .

6 points
8
2
stockholder's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:31 pm

I just Love the excuses already.

-4 points
2
6
Coldworld's picture

May 11, 2023 at 04:36 pm

You have voiced your disdain for Barry just as vehemently. So I know that’s just bitterness. To let that twist things so far isn’t healthy.

2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

May 11, 2023 at 07:29 pm

I have because I want the 4 front. The 4-2 -5.
Is being played more. I saw Reed and Lowrey Rush.
And it just isn't enough/

1 points
2
1
jannes bjornson's picture

May 12, 2023 at 09:46 am

If they run his light fronts again ,expect the defense to fold by halftime. Four down linemen stop the running game, not chase ILBs.

0 points
0
0
JohnnyLogan's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:24 pm

It should be do or die for MLF if Barry continues to hold down the title of the league’s worst DC. MLF is the problem, a cheerleader who doesn’t have the cahones to hold his staff responsible. Loyalty in football gets you fired. If he retains Berry through another awful defensive season they should both be sent packing. Unfortunately I see MLF being kept regardless of the record because expectations for this year are low.

5 points
5
0
jannes bjornson's picture

May 11, 2023 at 05:14 pm

Were they low for Burrow and Herbert when they hit the field as Rookies? Play to Win. Love is in year four, not week four.

0 points
1
1
T7Steve's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:27 pm

I think the D will be more ready at the start of the season than they've been recently. A whole different mindset this season and even the vets can't count a Bears game as final tune up preseason game.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:27 pm

Who did the D play against during that run? That oft cited expiation is as irritating as it is trite. Playing a bad O or one hamstrung by key injuries should make any D look better than against healthy and effective offenses.

Put bluntly, LaFleur is going to have to show what his offense is now Rodgers is gone. Yes, there are going to be issues of execution, but he needs to show us a design and tactical prowess regardless of breakdowns in how it’s executed.

Likewise, LaFleur needs to show why he kept Barry. There are a number of coaches that need to step up, but as DC and one who many thought should have gone last year, Barry is likely the lightning rod. He needs to get more from his group. That’s going to mean changing his scheme, personnel decisions and tactics as much as LaFleur.

This year may be a growth and learning year for Love and the youth, but it’s likely a do-or-die year for Barry. If he doesn’t get more out of this defensive roster, he’s done and, absent showing signs of offensive genius, LaFleur is likely a dead man walking too.

This is a bigger year for our coaching staff than anyone. It sounds like they plan significant changes on both sides of the ball. Those are needed. However, like McCarthy’s great reset in 2018, realizing that won’t help if the benefits don’t materialize on field.

13 points
14
1
Since'61's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:02 pm

Excellent and accurate post Coldworld. Numerous thumbs up.

It’s a honeymoon season for Love and the young players but it’s a prove it season for MLF and the coaching staff.
Thanks, Since ‘61

4 points
4
0
Packers2020's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:16 pm

Cold,

What I am interested to see is if ML is really the guru that everyone says he is. Will his offense be at least solid this year and continue to improve without AR? Will it show us that AR was a part of the problem or will it show us that AR was the reason the offense was solid. If the O is a disaster this year, we may have a bigger issue than we think on coaching that side of the ball. Personally, I am not sure I have confidence in ML to get this done with some of the decisions he has made in the last 4 or so years.

We all know Barry is incompetent. I have no confidence that he will lead this defense where it needs to be. How our HC believes that he will, I have no idea.

I hope I am wrong on both counts.

4 points
4
0
PatB's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:31 pm

Barry is clearly on his last chance.

With Murphy's retirement already announced, I think MLF is safe until that time, unless the next president is selected and involved by coaching-carousel time after this season.

The next couple of years will be big for Gutekunst too.

2 points
3
1
croatpackfan's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:28 pm

"Josiah Deguara and Tyler Davis are the only experienced tight ends on the roster but neither has been a significant threat in the downfield passing game."

Gil, please go watch both Joshiah Deguara TD and than talk how he is not threat downfield in passing game. Why Deguara did not get more chances you should be asking previous Packers QB (I forgot the name!) who has his darlings and others were there just to collect snap crumbs, if any!

Second, every time when Deguara catch the ball he gain at least another 2 to 3 yards of the original catch point and he never fumbled like some former very experienced TEs, or former QB darling TE (who is with bears now) who very often was catch and go down TE last 2 years.

I really do not understand why people are forgetting that Davante Adams was rarely targeted until Packers released Jordy Nelson, Jones, and Cobb. When former QB was forced to use Davante Adams, there came enlightment in his brain to the extend that he always first look to Davante, than throwing the ball away if Davante was not open.

Playing D is very hard and tiresome job. Especially when your QB produce so many 3 and outs and TOP was heavily on the side of the opponent. And we knows why was that - simple explanation "hero balls".

This season I believe we can see better Packers D with veterans (Kenny, Jaire, Rasoul, Tavarius, Rudy, Preston, Kingsley, TJ, Devonte and addition of capable draftees like Lukas, Colby, Karl, Carrington, Anthony) and others that my surprise all of us.

Also, I believe Packers will be, finally the team with TOP to their side, so it will leave D more time to rest themselves at the sideline during games.

"No doubt it will take Love some time to get up to speed."
I believe Jordan already adapted himself to the NFL speed, as was shown in that 2 series in 4th Q vs Philadelphia game. As are Christian, Romeo, Samori. Also Reed looks well in that (game speed) department.

My humble opinion. I have high hopes and zero expectations.

2 points
9
7
T7Steve's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:45 pm

After all that, you say "I have high hopes and zero expectations."? LOL.

You are right there on most of your points, but I have high expectations every season.

This season requires (as CW so nicely/rightly puts it above) ALL the coaches to meet these expectations and hold themselves and each other accountable. I'm tired of the players putting the blame on their own shoulders, and a head coach that needs to look at the game film after a game to figure out what went wrong.

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:29 pm

Well, I have hope that all coaches will show some expertise (I know it looks now like fools hope regarding Barry), but because of doubts in MLF as HC I have no expectations.

I have opinion that Packers roster is very talented, and that many players last season played under expectations because they were wrongly used or used against their abilities. My hope comes from the fact that no one Packers coach was at combine, because they were preparing new playbooks, on offense, defense and ST. Plus, there is Rich Bisaccia, coach who does not suffer stupidities. It is important point that he was promoted and now is Assistant HC to MLF. I doubt that Barry will be long on his position if things will not be changed.

1 points
2
1
T7Steve's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:02 pm

I think if coach B (as I've commented before) can help game plan and make in-game adjustments while the OC/HC and DC are trying to call plays, it will be a win/win. Even the greatest coaches trusted the eyes of their assistants. It's very hard to be so involved with one phase of the game and not just hope the best for the rest of the phases, which is probably why STs and the D suffered for sooo long.

We could get along during the regular seasons with an average D (per LH) and poor ST when we had the best offense in the league. Just lose a click on offense and we all saw what happens.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:14 pm

And that is why I have hope!

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:14 pm

Double daily!

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:01 pm

I agree that Deguara was under utilized/ignored by Rodgers - for whatever cryptic reason. So much of MLFs offense was discounted by Rodgers - while supplanted with his own offensive playbook. Which is why I am looking forward to a more complete and creative offense with Love.

2 points
6
4
Vachio's picture

May 11, 2023 at 05:29 pm

Right there with you on Deguara. I think he's absolutely capable of being a weapon with Love running the offense.

2 points
3
1
Vachio's picture

May 11, 2023 at 05:29 pm

Right there with you on Deguara. I think he's absolutely capable of being a weapon with Love running the offense.

-3 points
0
3
Since'61's picture

May 11, 2023 at 06:22 pm

"Playing D is very hard and tiresome job. Especially when your QB produce so many 3 and outs and TOP was heavily on the side of the opponent. And we knows why was that - simple explanation "hero balls.
Also, I believe Packers will be, finally the team with TOP to their side, so it will leave D more time to rest themselves at the sideline during games."

Croat I'm sorry but you need to check your facts. Your sentences above are totally false.

The Packers average time of possession per game for the last 5 seasons follow below:

2022 - 31.4 minutes per game. Tied for 2nd in the league
2021 - 32.37 minutes per game. #1 in the league
2020 - 32.50 minutes per game. #1 in the league
2019 - 31.20 minutes per game. #5 in the league
2018 - 29.35 minutes per game. # 18 in the league

I understand that you hate Aaron Rodgers and will make any claim to smear him and his play for the Packers. That's fine, you are entitled to do that.

However this information is easy to check and your posts lose credibility when you fail to take the time to check your facts. You are either aware of this information and don't care just to make your point or you assume that the rest of our posters here at CHTV are too stupid to check or track the numbers. At the very least give some of us credit for actually paying attention to the games and the facts.

I happen to track many of the Packers numbers myself per game but even then I go back and check more reliable sources before I make comments which are supported with truthful facts. That is out of respect for the others who post and read our comments.

As the actual TOP numbers show the Packers defense has had TOP on their side for the last 4 consecutive seasons. And that the defense has had time to rest.

I can agree that Rodgers took unnecessary "hero ball" shots but asserting that is the reason for the Packers 3 and outs and putting the Packers behind on TOP is just not correct or fair to Rodgers or the rest of the offense. AT LEAST BE FAIR and don't assume that the rest of us will take your posts as accurate. That is not FAIR to the rest of us blogging here at CHTV.

I'm not trying to defend Rodgers with these comments. I'm just trying to defend the team and the facts. I would make the same comments for whoever plays QB and on offense for the Packers.

We are all entitled to our own opinions but we are not entitled to our own facts. If we can't agree on a simple issue like time of possession we're just wasting our time here. What's next, we 're going make up the score of the games to make our points? Thanks, Since '61

3 points
4
1
fthisJack's picture

May 12, 2023 at 08:03 am

TOP is not a good indicator of how productive a team is. You can slog up and down the field and chew up time and come away with FG or nothing while the other team is scoring TD's in a short amount of time. And when you have a QB that doesn't take the snap until 1 sec left on the play clock that adds substantially to the TOP. It's really an irrelavent stat.

2 points
2
0
Since'61's picture

May 12, 2023 at 08:24 am

Correct TOP is not a good indicator. In fact the Packers TOP in 2022 indicates that the team was not efficient on offense in 2022. They were not good in the Red Zone and they settled for too many FGs rather than TDs.

That is the point about the Packers 2022 offense and their 2022 TOP. Not that the team kept the defense on the field for too long which is inaccurate and only used to attack the Packers QB.

I'm fully aware that TOP is not a good indicator of offensive success. BTW, taking the snap down to the last second actually helps to keep the defense off the field longer, especially during a long drive. I would not say that TOP is an irrelevant stat. It is measure of how effective the OL is playing.

What it doesn't speak to could be the fact that the opponent scored TDs or FGs relatively quickly because of the defense giving up chunks of yardage and scoring TDs and/or FGs quickly and easily. If a team gives up 35 points and their offense is on the field for 35 minutes we can conclude that the defense was porous and that the offense was inefficient with the amount of time they had the ball. In this era of the NFL that happens frequently.

Bottom line the original TOP comment by the original poster was not researched and was used to make an inaccurate point about the Packers offense and the defense. The defense was not on the wrong side of the TOP. ON average they played less than half the game. Thanks, Since '61

3 points
3
0
fthisJack's picture

May 13, 2023 at 08:36 am

Right on 61!

1 points
1
0
Cwilly's picture

May 14, 2023 at 02:36 pm

You always put the right argument and use facts. Everything you said was spot on and the defense cost us a lot of games and play off games. I don’t expect a lot this year with the same defense being ran by the same bad coordinator. I think this is a year where our management gets exposed for their ineptitude. I just hope there are consequences. The amount of draft capital spent on the defense hasn’t worked. We still are bad every year and it gets old. Imagine Higgins over Love. Maybe we win or make Super Bowl. If JL plays well then it was worth it but if not we could have had another Lombardi!

1 points
1
0
4thand10's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:33 pm

Last yr they had a goal line stop. This is just off the top of my head, I’m not looking it up…but I don’t remember another significant goal line stop since 2014. The Defenses over the last decade have not been good, maybe little nuggets of plays here and there but not good. When They had Pettine, I had a little hope because they actually fielded 3 down lineman plus 2 Edge rushers and wow…low and behold the run defense magically improved, but then the CB/Safety/ generalized “DB” play was poor. Barry came in… I was impressed when they Played 4 DL and 1 Edge rusher against TBs massive running game and the titans massive running game. So I thought “hey, ok, we might have a coach that’s capable of making adjustments for specific teams”. Then he goes back to the Capers style 2-4-5 that doesn’t stop anyone….run or pass. On top of that, and Nagler and others have covered this extensively….no friggin press man on 3rd and 3s. I Almost want an old school coach that just gets a stout defense that plays a 4-3 cover 2 and just calls it good. It would force these Rookie QBs across the league to actually be accurate and it definitely slows down a rushing attack, wildcats and QB sneaks we have been seeing trend lately. The One good thing that i’m seeing is that the Packers are getting much bigger and stronger on Edge and they finally have a fast strong linebacker who can go sideline to sideline in Quay Walker. Hopefully he doesn’t have any mental errors that cost us games this year. But no…it’s a team sport, yes the D has to play better. But special teams play( which will be better) and field position and not putting the defense in crappy spots is also important. Rodgers thumb and additional picks last yr certainly didn’t help the cause either. If Love plays just mediocre with no turnovers, the pencils teams improve and we run the f’img ball I think we’ll have a good season. I’m optimistic.

5 points
6
1
TXCHEESE's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:35 pm

I think much of the improvement in the last few games was due mainly to the level of competition. Miami's QB was probably concussed a portion of that game and the Bears and Rams were not exactly offensive powerhouses. Kirk was gonna Kirk (especially with 2 or 3 missing OL for Minny), and basically Detroit ran over the defense the last quarter of that game. Only when the front seven can effectively control the other teams running game, can this defense be declared competent.

5 points
5
0
splitpea1's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:44 pm

Don't forget that the front half of our defense is almost in as much development mode as the offense. Although Wooden and Brooks (supposedly a great technician according to some scouting reports) lined up in multiple areas in college, they're best as pass rushers from the interior. But I do worry about how we're going to hold up against the run; Wooden is not an anchor, but maybe Brooks will be--but competing against NFL-level talent is going to be a big step up for him possibly. DL coach Montgomery will have his work cut out for him, as Clark and Slaton are the only players who have logged over 500 snaps.

0 points
2
2
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:50 pm

My concern is that DC talent is less than D player talent. It was apparent that for approximately 3/4s of last season Barry tried to fit the players into his system - with dismal results. Only when he later designed a system to fit the players - were better results achieved. And I don't think that his late season adjustments were entirely voluntary as I suspect an intervention from MLF/+ Bisaccia.

For this year, the 2 greatest weaknesses I see in the Defense is first Barry - who has never coached a third year as a DC (having been fired after the 2nd year in his 2 previous stints as a DC). And secondly - the run defense. When Kenny Clark brings up the need to improve the run D this year - this is akin to insider information. We should pay attention.

4 points
6
2
T7Steve's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:11 pm

He started adjusting to what his players did well, he just couldn't adjust the D to what the opposing Os did well or how it changed during the game.

2 points
2
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:34 pm

Interesting perspective.

2 points
2
0
Vachio's picture

May 11, 2023 at 05:33 pm

That's my concern as well. I feel like we could give him an All-Madden hall of fame squad and we'd still end up with a bottom half defense.

3 points
3
0
BirdDogUni's picture

May 11, 2023 at 12:53 pm

Kenny Clark
Jaire Alexander
Rashan Gary
Darnell Savage
Eric Stokes
Quay Walker
Devonte Wyatt
Lukas Van Ness

Eight 1st round picks. If we can find a way for Joe Barry or hopefully, Richie B to get these guys playing like 1st round picks, as a unit.
We could have a decent defense! IDK why MaLF insisted on keeping Joe Barry, but if he doesn't improve, I doubt our defense will improve.

Maybe with the addition of Richie B as Assistant Head Coach will be the move that takes our defense from average to great?

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:17 pm

He just doesn't seem to make them get mean and not let themselves get pushed around. That's why I kinda liked the attitude that Walker showed. A good coach could direct that to the play, not after the play. Mean and Nasty (you aren't gunna push ME around).

0 points
1
1
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:25 pm

One of the reasons that Barry may have been retained is because the FO did not want to payout his 3rd year salary - as Bisaccia may have become the de facto associate DC. If so, then the D has a better chance for improvement.

4 points
5
1
Leatherhead's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:26 pm

""""We could have a decent defense""

We had a decent defense. 17th in scoring. Average. We had one of the better pass defenses in the league.

-1 points
3
4
Coldworld's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:51 pm

Our D was not awful statistically, though it was, and was visibly dysfunctional, at times. However, it was nowhere near what it should be in paper and seemed often to be countering not focusing on player strengths. It played below reasonable expectations: it must get better.

7 points
7
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 11, 2023 at 03:29 pm

You're going to need to point out the visible dysfunctioniality to me. "Nowhere near what it should be on paper?" According to who.

We gave up two more points than the Super Bowl champion. We held 16 out of 17 opponents to 28 or less. We lost games where we held the opponent to 16 points.

-1 points
2
3
Coldworld's picture

May 11, 2023 at 04:41 pm

If I do need to, I don’t know how much you watched. You were here while we discussed it at length, so that’s tongue in cheek, but I think justified.

The O, had it have been close to adequate, that would have helped the D immensely. However, that doesn’t change the fact that the D did not match expectations, even as perhaps the better unit. The O has now seen a major change in the departure of Rodgers, Cobb, Lazard and Tonyan. It’s going to be faster, bigger and rawer, but it’s going to be different. Barry needs to match that change up on his end with a much more established bunch.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:58 pm

You are being kind, LH. They were also one of the worst run defenses in both yards and yds/game. The weak run D helped pad the pass D stats. Why pass when you can run?

The pass D should be very good. They were one of the best in the NFL when playing press man on 3rd down. And one of the worst when playing quarters zone on 3rd down...which Barry does A LOT.

The issue with the defense is not the players and their talents...it is more than decent. The coaching is not.

5 points
5
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 11, 2023 at 03:07 pm

How much of that was due to a punchless offense who put little to no pressure on opposing teams which allowed them to stay with positive game scripts? The best run defense is an offense who scores points early and forces the other team to play catch up. If you're constantly behind in 2nd half of games, your opponents will run at will and even the best defenses get tired.

0 points
3
3
Leatherhead's picture

May 11, 2023 at 03:32 pm

You don't get the run defense stuff. I've tried to explain it but you don't get it.

A GOOD runner gets 5 yards/carry. An AVERAGE QB gets 7 yards per pass attempt. 7>5. Also, most of your big plays, and your TDs, come off passes. So why do you want to encourage teams to pass on you?

You think it's a weak run defense. I think we're encouraging them to not pass, and it's working.

-3 points
1
4
LambeauPlain's picture

May 11, 2023 at 04:51 pm

I get run D...I simply do not agree with your narrative.

A run play is the safest play. A pass play can get more yards, but more risky and or offenses would pass most virtually all of the time.

When you are moving the chains running the ball against the Packers and getting into scoring position...you keep doing it until the run D stops it.

The 4th quarter against the Lions with the playoffs on the line, they RAN against the Packers play after play for first downs and end the game.

4 points
4
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 11, 2023 at 05:19 pm

It is interesting that you mentioned the Lions drive. 75 yards, 8 minutes. 14 plays, SIX of them passes, including the 14 yarder which was their longest play. Maybe you are surprised that one of the best offensive teams in the league can do that, but I'm not.

After that score we still had 6 minutes left. The offense couldn't move the ball against one of the worst defenses in the league and finally Rodgers was intercepted.

Detroit had 104 rushing yards on 24 attempts. They were 4 out of 12 in 3rd down conversions. But yeah, that's the reason we lost. We had the ball for over 32 minutes, Detroit had it for 28 minutes. But it was our run defense that failed. You bet.

-1 points
1
2
dobber's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:57 pm

If the offense turns a few of those 3's into 7's last year, things look a lot different.

4 points
4
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 11, 2023 at 03:39 pm

I checked back. We only lost one close game, the Washington game (by two points). We didn't kick any FGs.

We scored 22 or fewer points 9 times last year, and lost 8 of those games. None of the opponents scored over 27.

We were in these games, but if you're only going to score 22 points, that's putting quite a bit of pressure on the defense.

-1 points
2
3
Coldworld's picture

May 11, 2023 at 04:58 pm

The offense was our Achilles heel. As you point out, we just couldn’t score too often and too frequently lost the time of possession battle too. That fact, however, does not change the fact that the D significantly underperformed expectations, yielded a league leading yards-per-run average of 5.0 and was often porous in the passing game.

We had struggles with zone, we played too far off, we misused players against known strengths, arguably failed to give more snaps for better play …. The defense was visibly worse than the sum of it’s parts. Numerous players declined. That the offense was equally visibly bad doesn’t change that. Fixing one flat tire out of 2 does not get you home.

4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

May 12, 2023 at 08:18 am

I think the opportunities missed to put pressure on opposing teams to move the football and score (basically, to play against the Packers' strength on defense) by putting up a few more 7s over 3s made a difference in game flow and probably cost the Packers a couple games. Packers played 9 one-score games in 2022, they were 4-5 in those games.

1 points
1
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:28 pm

Rich's promotion means a higher salary and more responsibilities. Let's hope as Assist HC he is spending his time on both Defense and STs.

He seems to be a good judge of football talent and how to maximize it to build the best team.

5 points
5
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 11, 2023 at 03:00 pm

2 of those guys were rookies last year and rookies usually stink. 2 of them missed half the year due to injury. And not 1 of them was a top 10 pick. Only 3 were top 20 picks. So 5 of them were basically guys with high 2nd round grades. Great talents, but far from elite. The byproduct of usually having a good team is you never have a chance at the cream of the crop. Context matters.

0 points
2
2
Leatherhead's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:22 pm

In our last two elimination games, in 2021 and 2022, the defense played very well while the offense did virtually nothing, but the pressure is on the defense. OK.

We gave up two more points than KC, but obviously that's where the problem is. Not the hundred-odd points the KC offense scored that we didn't.

4 points
9
5
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:57 pm

Well said, LH. Does Barry have flaws? Of course. But that defense played well down the stretch and nearly carried a punchless offense to the playoffs. People are quick to trash Barry while blatantly ignoring his successes.

-6 points
0
6
Coldworld's picture

May 11, 2023 at 05:13 pm

That defense played well against our offense in camp. The stretch run coincided with similarly ineffective offenses, a mix of bad and injury deprived when we faced them. That was the primary difference.

Our O didn’t play better, but their Os played worse. I do agree that the utterly incompetent offense (against a very very poor D) in both Detroit games was simply too much to expect a D to overcome. You just can’t have any D out in the field that long and thus giving an opponent so many chances.

So yes, the D was not statistically dire, unless you consider the personnel and forget what we saw, it was just blah. It was not good enough. Not with the talent we have. No D with that number of players regressing on the prior season with the same coach is running smoothly or optimally and they repeatedly failed the eyeball test. They were average overall, at times woeful (Eagles and Minnesota 1). They padded their stats a bit later on against weak teams.

In my opinion, they were actually better at the end of the prior season before Barry sold out on off zone shell coverage despite who he had on his roster. We saw players frustrated, we saw a DB coach frustrated. We saw players start to freelance: that is arguably what led to at least some change. No, this D visibly failed to reach its capabilities. We all knew it at the time. Let’s not forget it now, simply because statistically the O stunk worse. The O was old, slow, poorly coached too and the rookies Ill used or injured. The D lacked that excuse beyond Gary and Barry.

2 points
2
0
Vachio's picture

May 11, 2023 at 05:55 pm

That's what makes it frustrating. We've seen the flashes and then we need OT to beat a Patriots team run by Bailey Zappe, we lose to the Zach Wilson led Jets, we lose to a Giants team led by an injured Daniel Jones, we lose to a Washington team led by Taylor Heinicke.

The other thing is we appear to have no counterpunch. Once a team figures out how to exploit a weakness, we're toast. I wrestled in high school and you always had a secondary (and a tertiary) move in your arsenal should your opponent figure out how to stop your first move and generally, you tried to make the secondary/tertiary moves ones that would be open when they successfully defend against the primary move. Same principle "should" be at play in football, but I haven't seen any evidence of that with Barry at the helm. That's what I loved about the Holmgren/Shurmur teams...they had counterpunches when what they wanted to do didn't work.

2 points
2
0
Since'61's picture

May 11, 2023 at 06:48 pm

LH the offense was off track for just about the entire season. First we had musical OLs for the first 5-6 games. We also had numerous injuries to the receiving core early in the season, specifically and most importantly to Watson.

By game 5, Rodgers injured his thumb and was ineffective for next 5-6 games. Even during the 4 game winning streak towards the end of the season the offense was inconsistent in those wins Except for the Dallas and 2nd Viking games.

Since this article is about defense we should stick with the defense and while there were games where they deserved a better fate they were also inconsistent for much of the season. Especially on 3rd and long, in the red zone and in stopping the run. Untimely stupid penalties were also a factor.

For both the offense and defense we need to look at the coaches and the decisions they made during the season. I was against playing Jenkins at RT and I wanted the Packers to play Jenkins at his LG position once he was 100% ready following recovery his injury. I don't think he was fully recovered when he played at RT and it showed. That was a poor decision by the staff.

Another poor decision was allowing Rodgers to continue to play through his thumb injury. I know that we have posters here who believe that was Rodgers fault for wanting to play but that's incorrect. All players want to play, injured or not. That's why coaches are responsible to make the decisions about who plays. If MLF caved into Rodgers and allowed him to play while he was injured then MLF should not be an NFL head coach. Coaches need to put their best healthy players on the field who give their team the best chance to win.

Beyond that if Love isn't better than an injured Rodgers how or why should we expect him to be ready to start as QB for the Packers? Also if he was ready why didn't he start while Rodgers was injured? Something in that scenario/decision does not make sense. We probably lost our chance to make the playoffs because our HC could not make the decision that was necessary at that time.

As for the defense, they lost 3 key players to injury. Gary, Stokes and Campbell. Combine their injuries with playing our CBs 7-10 yards off the LOS and we are killed against the run. Another poor decision by Barry. I knew the defense was going to be in trouble from the 1st game of the season when Barry did not have Alexander cover Jefferson in the opening game against the Vikings. WTF? Why? Stupid decision by Barry. The result was Jefferson literally running free through the Packers secondary. The other point is the consistent lack of adjustments on defense throughout the games. Except for the 2nd Vikings game I didn't see the defense respond to an opponents offense for the rest of the season or not until the games were already lost. There were too many plays where the defense had communication breakdowns and the secondary in particular looked totally bewildered on the field. I won't get into the poor tackling because that has gone on forever but combined with playing 7-10 yards off the LOS just about ensures that the defense will lose on many plays.

As I've posted I'm hoping to see the Packers take the steps required to put the defense in better positions to succeed. For me I'd like to see better tackling, improved run defense and our CBs playing about 3 yards off the LOS and challenging our opponents WRS off the LOS. That is what I'll be looking for early in the season.

Plenty can happen over the next 4 months before the season begins. Hoping for the best and looking forward to the season. Thanks, Since '61

2 points
2
0
Packer_Fan's picture

May 11, 2023 at 01:24 pm

For certain on the premise that the defense will need to play better and carry the team to a few victories. But the problem is, what will Barry bring, soft zones or aggressive play. And what will Lafleur bring, weak answers if Barry plays soft.

There is player talent. But both Barry and Lafleur need to step up their games. There will be games with average or weak QB play and Barry can't let that QB be all world for a game. And Lafleur can't let defenses shut down the offense for large portions of games. Both of these situations occurred last year and contributed to the losing season.

We talk a lot about players, but coaches affect the game too. Neither Lafleur or Barry won't have Rodgers as a crutch. Time for the coaches to step up and have the team play better than their talent and experience levels.

7 points
8
1
ReaganRulz's picture

May 11, 2023 at 08:58 pm

No excuses for Barry, but for Lafleur…he won’t have a QB that changes plays or cherry picks who he wants to throw it to. Lafleur definitely has some pressure on him to produce, but I would imagine that he will finally be able to run the offense the way he envisioned it from day one!!

-2 points
0
2
jhtobias's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:16 pm

At this point i have no faith in berry but especially lafluer as coaches or leaders.

I dont blame joe berry he didnt hire himself . I really think lafluer has a great offensive mind but is no head coach.

The thing that hurts is we have a man on the staff the defense the offense and special teams would run through a brick wall for and that us rich b .

Well there is a reason jerry grey left he say these stupid zones were killing us went somewhere where hus voice mattered.

2 points
3
1
fireball's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:22 pm

I have little faith in the Packer defensive coordinator, Joe Barry. He did not have a good record when he was hired by LaFleur. A terrible record in '07 and '08 in Detroit as defensive coordinator. Another bad record in '15 and '16 as defensive coordinator with Washington. Now two bad years in a row as defensive coordinator with the Packers. Sooo, so far, as defensive coordinator for three different teams, he has failed. I don't get it. Why is LaFleur hanging on to Barry? Is there some kind of strong connection, like family maybe, that not only caused LaFleur to hire Barry in the first place ( when Barry was already thought of as being " mediocre " at best. ) but to double down on keeping him after two failed seasons with the Packers. Maybe LaFleur does not want to admit his own failure in hiring Barry.

Remember, too, LaFleur was successful with the offense in '20 and '21 and with Aaron Rodgers winning MVP both those years with Nathaniel Hackett as his offensive coordinator. In 2022, with Hackett gone and Matt LaFleur on his own, the offense was miserable. So, in fact, both Joe Barry and Matt LaFleur have a lot to prove.

2 points
2
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:55 pm

Bill Belichick couldnt have made those Detroit or Washington defenses competent. And yes, the Packers defense has a bunch of talent but they still have to play better. Its not all on Barry. It just isnt that simple.

-3 points
1
4
coolhand's picture

May 11, 2023 at 02:34 pm

" inside linebacker Quay Walker and defensive linemen Kenny Clark and Devonte Wyatt."

I would not count Wyatt as a large contributor as a 1st round pick since he hardly played until later in the year.

0 points
1
1
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 11, 2023 at 03:18 pm

What does this defense do well? Defend the pass right? And how do you force teams to pass? By scoring points early in games right? It stands to reason the problem last year was an offense that did next to nothing to help the defense, especially in the 2nd half. More points on offense= less rush yards on defense.

-1 points
2
3
stockholder's picture

May 11, 2023 at 07:36 pm

It stands to reason that Walker must play and not get kicked out.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

May 12, 2023 at 10:00 am

Waste of the #22.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

May 11, 2023 at 03:34 pm

It will be vital that Barry designs a defense that plays to the strengths of what is viewed as a very talented roster on defense that hasn’t quite lived up to its potential on the field. (Key quote from the article).

We're doomed.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

May 11, 2023 at 04:42 pm

Hats off to Leatherhead & The_Baloney_Stops_Here!

They are the main voices of reason here in my eyes along with a few others who made great points as well.

For the life of me, friends, I cannot understand those complaints railing on Barry without considering that changing from Pettine to Barry would require more than 2 drafts, (half each dedicated to O players) in order to change out players specific to what Barry will run.

WHY SO MANY PLAYERS needed? LaFleur stated he wanted a defense virtually unheard of previously. One that employed the same “Illusion of Complexity,” principles he wants to run on O.

We had virtually zero FA cash, and trading for players to run what Barry was hired to do was not possible. The draft became our major source for adding specific talents.

Aaron Rodgers led offenses failed to score enough points, and Barry’s defenses NEVER had all the players he needed to run the scheme he & LaFleur agreed upon.

Why keep mindlessly barking up the stupid tree? Barry’s entering his Year 3, and likely has what he now needs to run THAT defense promised to Packer nation in 2021 upon his hire.

If this is the dereliction of duty many here are truly claiming it to be, I’ll be stunned, but, hell yeah, Barry and LaFleur would show cause for termination, maybe. Only year for each to work their schemes seems ludicrous.

Murphy insisted on BOTH Pettine & AR!!! Literally setting us back YEARS!!!

And, I don’t buy this Bisaccia Assistant HC narrative to oversee Barry. C’mon. It was to insure he could only be hired away for a HC job or nothing, protecting our STs.

We lost our starting CB opposite Jaire, Eric Stokes, very early in the 2022 season, then lost our TOP pass rusher midway through the schedule. Add in “Aaron I Don’t Care,” and I think that picture is crystal clear. “Fire Barry?”

No one can say exactly what Barry’s Defensive scheme actually is because he NEVER had the full complement of players to run it. How about we wait to see the D as conceptualized with the players required before torching the poor bastard?

And, let’s wait just a little longer to actually see the Offensive scheme we were promised 4 seasons ago upon LaFleur’s hire.

Sound reasonable? Sound exciting? I say, HELL YES, both O and D! Plus some Great STs? ALL 3 PHASES?

I think THIS Packers team is the one we’ve been hoping for, for years.

-5 points
1
6
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 11, 2023 at 06:24 pm

Gg you are a kinder critic than I. Like many of us, I had high expectations for the D in 2022. However in the very first game - when Barry refused to put our best corner (Alexander) on the Vikings best receiver (Jefferson) - I was completely dumbfounded. Of course Jefferson had a monster game - which we lost. Then Barry continued to play non-press and soft zone for the majority of the season - until he changed tactics. Involuntarily I suspect.

I do not like a DC who plays sacred and soft. This sends the wrong signal to a D - regardless of their on-field personnel.

That being said, I am somewhat optimistic about this year's D. Not because of Barry but because of Bisaccia - whom I believe will be directly involved with the D.

Of course, a time-consuming offense would definitely help the D. Conversely, a drive-stopping defense could help the O. Regardless, we will have much to discuss and banter about it this team - which it appears has already started.

3 points
3
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 11, 2023 at 06:40 pm

''''Gg you are a kinder critic than I. Like many of us, I had high expectations for the D in 2022. However in the very first game - when Barry refused to put our best corner (Alexander) on the Vikings best receiver (Jefferson) - I was completely dumbfounded. Of course Jefferson had a monster game - ''''

The Vikings scored on their first possession, and got one more TD, and finished with 23 points. We helped them with two turnovers. Only one team held Minnesota to less than 23 points on their home field. They only converted 4-13 third downs.

You see holding a good offensive team, on their home opener, to one of their lowest point totals of the season, as not a good thing because one guy caught a lot of short passes and one really long one?

We also held them to their 2nd lowest total on the road.

-2 points
1
3
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 11, 2023 at 07:29 pm

Close does not count in the NFL. Not that the game was even close as Packers (the favorite) lost by 16 pts. Also Jefferson - 2 TDs and 184 yards. Barry had no idea on how to defend him.

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

May 11, 2023 at 06:49 pm

Let’s dive in here, my brother.

Eric Stokes, the darling CB from his 2021 rookie season was made to look like a chump vs. the most dynamic WR to enter the NFL in years with 3 years experience, at MIN? In 2022’s 1st game??? Lesson learned and you move on.

Barry wants CBs equally adept in zone & press. What if Stokes needs more work in zone coverage? Maybe Stokes wasn’t ready for what Barry ran that night, simple as that. Maybe he was sending a message to Gutekunst on the importance of DBs capable of playing both coverages proficiently.

???

Stokes had the speed and size to match Jefferson, and had a bad day. That happens.

But, Barry was scared? No. I can’t believe that narrative.

Has there been a single word from team management about Bisaccia overseeing D, or about Joe Barry’s competence? No.

Zone coverage is playing “soft?” No. Not with good zone DBs.

Maybe it’s better to just sit back and see it all with players capable of handling each position.

Btw, Suuuuul got paid because he’s equally good in both zone & press coverage.

-5 points
0
5
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 11, 2023 at 07:40 pm

So what use is the highest paid CB in the league if you don't play him against the other team's best WR ? A total misallocation of resources. As for Stokes - it was apparent that he was struggling against Jefferson. In-game adjustments are a critical part for any coach. This was absent from Barry.

Also, I think it reasonable that with Bisaccia's promotion comes greater responsibilities. Barry is on the hot seat this year - not so much MLF. It just makes sense that Bisaccia will be close to any hot spots.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

May 11, 2023 at 09:06 pm

We’ll see. All I know is that DL/EDGE gained one helluva lot of youth, size, speed, heavy, punishing hands, bend up the freaking hooha, and production. Off the charts stuff there.

WE LACKED BOTH pass rush & run stop.

Without a pass rush, no coverage scheme is worth anything.

The Packers had 1 sack & 3 Hurries v. MIN that day. 8 missed tackles. 1 by Jaire. 0 by Stokes. Jaire gave up 3 completions. Stokes gave up 4 completions.

-1 points
1
2
Cwilly's picture

May 14, 2023 at 02:46 pm

Stokes relies to much on speed for coverage. In college that works but in the pros it doesn’t. Everyone is fast and this is a make or break year for him. If he can’t adapt to defensive schemes and the coverage that goes with them he’s a bust. Luckily we have Douglas who was much more consistent that stokes. I don’t have much faith in players that still play like their in college.

0 points
0
0
4thand10's picture

May 11, 2023 at 07:46 pm

Logic.

2 points
2
0
White92's picture

May 11, 2023 at 09:52 pm

You correctly outline several problems with this roster, yet I keep hearing what a great GM Gkunst is. I don't get it.

2 points
2
0
joejetson's picture

May 11, 2023 at 09:53 pm

My main problem with MLF is his apparent indecisiveness. He stays with the status quo too long, even when it's obvious the schemes/players aren't producing. Examples being how he stuck with Kevin King as starting CB even after he blew a legitimate shot to go to the Super Bowl. They even brought him back the following season. Another example- soft zone coverages on 3rd downs.
Now, supposedly with #12 gone, we will see his "real" offense. HE was the Head Coach, not AR. If he didn't like what Rodgers was doing, HE should have exerted his authority. Can you imagine a Lombardi or Belichek being afraid of bruising a player's ego?
I don't have a lot of confidence in LaFuer's leadership. Hope I'm wrong, but we'll see this year.

4 points
4
0
White92's picture

May 11, 2023 at 09:59 pm

You are correct. Amari returning punts and fumbling nearly every other time while an all pro is on the sidelines?? Coach said they didn't know what they had?? Inexcusable

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

May 12, 2023 at 10:04 am

They gave HIM an extension?

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

May 12, 2023 at 10:27 am

Everyone could see AR was mandated upon LaFleur by Murphy.

Everyone.

Along with that mandate came insubordination & malcontentedness.

Show me one young HC who wouldn’t be rattled by that.

-1 points
0
1
Ferrari-Driver's picture

May 12, 2023 at 09:43 am

May or may not be more pressure on the defense, but I do think there will be more pressure on Barry to have a better performing defense. He's essentially gotten all the top picks in the Packers draft for more than a decade with which to work and thus far, the results have been less than stellar.

0 points
0
0