The Outlook of the Safety Positions for the Green Bay Packers

The back-end of the Packers' secondary is no longer a strength. 

Not too long ago, the future at the safety position looked bright for the Green Bay Packers, thanks to the strong play of Adrian Amos at strong safety and Darnell Savage at free safety. Now? Not so much. The Packers voided Amos’ contract, making him a free agent, and Savage was benched last season, only to reemerge as a nickel cornerback in the late part of the season. There was online chatter that Rasul Douglas could make the transition to safety, but that was shut down by head coach Matt LaFleur last week when he acknowledged that Douglas’ best position was outside corner, a position that he will start out at to begin the season. LaFleur also acknowledged that Savage will start the season at safety. Thus, who will play next to the former first-round selection in 2023?

General manager Brian Gutekunst signed former San Francisco 49ers strong safety Tarvarius Moore to a one-year deal, but the former third-round selection played sparingly on defense through his first four years. He appeared in 22% of the defensive snaps in 2019, 23% in 2020, and only 5% last season, with only 13 total starts in four seasons. (He missed the entire 2021 season after suffering a torn Achilles.) The signing looks like it was to help the special teams unit more than the defense, given that Moore has appeared in more special teams snaps (1,096) than defensive snaps (1,046), according to Pro Football Reference. 

Safety Rudy Ford is another option to start alongside Savage, though he primarily played free safety last season. Ford, who re-signed with the Packers earlier this offseason, started six games and recorded three interceptions, both career highs, in 2022, with two of the interceptions coming against the Dallas Cowboys in Week 10. However, the former Jacksonville Jaguar was credited with six missed tackles last season and played poorly down the stretch. 

The most logical option, at this point in time, to find a starter at the other safety position would be through the draft. The problem with that, however, is that this year’s safety class is not particularly strong. Alabama’s Brian Branch is considered the No. 1 safety on the board, but some draft analysts project him as more of a nickel cornerback than a true safety. He also had a disappointing performance at the NFL Combine last month and finished with a Relative Athletic Score (RAS) of 6.1. ESPN draft analyst Matt Miller does not have a first-round grade on any safety and believes that, beyond Branch, “there is a solid chance that no others are selected in the top 50 picks.”

The Athletic’s Dane Brugler recently updated his list of the top-100 NFL Draft prospects, and he ranked only five safeties in the top 100, including one in the top 75 – Branch (No. 16), Texas A&M’s Antonio Johnson (No. 76), Penn State’s Ji’Ayir Brown (No. 84), Alabama’s Jordan Battle (No. 87), and Boise State’s JL Skinner (No. 91). 

One name that the Packers have on their radar is former Florida State safety Jammie Robinson, who will take a top-30 visit with the team, according to Pro Football Network’s Tony Pauline. While Robinson’s RAS of 5.97 from the Combine is concerning, sources told Pauline that Robinson “looked very good in drills” at the Florida State Pro Day. The five-foot-11 hard hitter was a two-time all-ACC honoree and recorded five interceptions in two seasons with the Seminoles (two interceptions total in the prior two seasons while at South Carolina). He also registered 99 combined tackles and five tackles for loss a season ago. His NFL.com player comp is Damarious Randall, a name that should ring a bell. Robinson was recently projected to go in the fifth round of ESPN’s Jordan Reid’s mock draft, which was published late last month. 

The Packers will also bring in Minnesota’s Jordan Howden for a top-30 visit, as reported by The Draft Network’s Ryan Fowler (h/t Justis Mosqueda of Acme Packing Co.). Howden is projected to be either a late-round draft pick or an undrafted free agent. 

Altogether, as it stands today, the safety positions are no longer assets for the Packers. That is not likely to change any time soon. 
 

__________________________

Rex is a lifelong Packers fan but was sick of the cold, so he moved to the heart of Cowboys country. Follow him on Twitter (@Sheild92) and Instagram (@rex.sheild). 

NFL Categories: 
7 points
 

Comments (85)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
mnbadger's picture

April 03, 2023 at 12:16 pm

Thank you for a full spectrum peak at available safeties in the upcoming draft.
Unfortunately, it looks like options are very limited at best for this glaring position of need.
We better have good corners, LB's and pass rush if the back end is going to hold up in 2023.
Do your best Gutey, you're our only chance with jbarry still at the helm!
GPG!

5 points
6
1
marpag1's picture

April 03, 2023 at 12:57 pm

I already said this under a different article, but I wonder how much it would cost the Packers to sign former Seahawk safety Ryan Neal. Seems like he played way better than the Seahawks gave him credit for, but maybe there's something going on with him that I don't know. Hawks let him go for nothing, and never really tried to keep him even though he had been a restricted FA.

3 points
4
1
golfpacker1's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:19 pm

For the FAs it always falls back to we have no money. What a great position for team to be in. 2 big holes where FA would be perfect-Safety & TE and we can't afford them. All the contract extensions are killing us.

2 points
2
0
Since'61's picture

April 03, 2023 at 03:25 pm

At least we have a big slide at Titletown and according to Mark Murphy "We're not idiots." So Murphy's remaining two years and his legacy are solid. Thanks, Since '61

2 points
3
1
TKWorldWide's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:02 pm

Whoa! Since 61 coming in hot! 😄

1 points
1
0
Racingdad's picture

April 03, 2023 at 03:12 pm

Ryan Neal is listed as a strong safety and we don’t need that type what gb needs is a free safety deep cover type . Travarious moore was out of college a free safety but 49ers tried to make him add weight to play strong safety — my hope is he came on as a free safety type once again

2 points
2
0
marpag1's picture

April 03, 2023 at 04:14 pm

So you're saying that there is a kind of safety that the Packers DON'T need?

Only 4 teams gave up more yards per rush than GB last year. Only 6 teams gave up more rushing yards overall. Just saying.

1 points
2
1
dobber's picture

April 03, 2023 at 08:05 pm

https://www.profootballrumors.com/2023/03/seahawks-withdraw-s-ryan-neals...

Agreed.
Big safety with good length, got a high coverage grade playing next to Quandre Diggs in Seattle.
Packers don't have a murderers' row of S candidates. This guy has an actual NFL track record.

5 points
5
0
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 11:09 pm

Agreed. I think we’d be better than I see us being this year through the draft and I don’t see a better FA other than maybe Amos, but I get the feeling he doesn’t want to come back.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

April 04, 2023 at 03:13 am

"So you're saying that there is a kind of safety that the Packers DON'T need?"

LOL, exactly what I was thinking. After reading your comment on another thread, I checked out Neal and came to the same conclusion. I have a strong suspicion that Seattle is going to make trading for Jamaal Adams look like a genius move by the GM come hell or high water.

0 points
0
0
Racingdad's picture

April 03, 2023 at 03:21 pm

Ryan Neal is listed as a strong safety and we don’t need that type what gb needs is a free safety deep cover type . Travarious moore was out of college a free safety but 49ers tried to make him add weight to play strong safety — my hope is he came on as a free safety type once again

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 04:57 pm

Unfortunately, under Barry, we need 2 safeties who can play deep center field, rotate into perimeter coverage and play close to the line in run coverage. Not many of those about. I think the point is we can’t look to guys that just hit or guys that just play deep unless the system is changed.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:13 pm

Draft bigger CBs and transition them into quarters to six deep. They put all their chips on Savage, they'll have to live with it.

1 points
1
0
splitpea1's picture

April 03, 2023 at 12:58 pm

Robinson isn't a bad prospect at all. He's a little short, but incredibly versatile and has a feisty and physical style that the Packers could really use in the defensive backfield.

Howden, while bigger and also experienced, is only projected to be a sixth or seventh round pick, so the Packers will need to dip into the talent pool with at least one much earlier pick.

2 points
2
0
packerbackerjim's picture

April 03, 2023 at 02:23 pm

I would rather they draft Antonio Johnson from Texas A&M.

0 points
0
0
Qoojo's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:00 pm

Sometimes you have to balance college production against future Pros against RAS. I think Gute doesn't waste the visits as much as TT did.

1 points
1
0
TacoTuesday's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:06 pm

For depth. Ryan Neal from the Seahawks $2mil and some tacos?

2 points
2
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:10 pm

Well the good news is that the guys that Green Bay would be interested in will be available in the 3rd round or later. If we trade back in the 1st round like we should to get our TE while picking up extra picks, we should fall right into that sweet spot the safeties will all be in. Jordan Battle is most draft gurus and my top choice for safety that fits what Green Bay needs. He has played against the best competition, the SEC. But Antonio Johnson or J L Skinner would work too. All could start.

Ronnie Hickman-Ohio State is a good one. Late picks Daniel Scott-Cal and Kaevon Meriweather-Iowa is a good one. A developmental possible position changer could be CB Mekhi Garner-LSU is 6'2 215 lbs. and 4.55. Sounds like a Safety.

Or the Jets young safety Ashtyn Davis could be asked for in the trade. He has played a lot for them and is cheap.

1 points
2
1
golfpacker1's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:29 pm

I am biased because I am a Hawkeye, but I would pick Kaevon Meriweather-Iowa over Robinson. 8.37 RAS and 6'0 @ 210 lbs. Really good ball skills and fundamentals like all Iowa D-backs. Could be has in 6 or 7th round.

0 points
1
1
BirdDogUni's picture

April 03, 2023 at 04:13 pm

Josh Jackson would like a word with you. Lol

4 points
4
0
dobber's picture

April 03, 2023 at 08:08 pm

Yes, but a Josh Jackson in the 5th-7th is a lot different than Josh Jackson in round 2.

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 03, 2023 at 08:38 pm

Wish we could go back and make it so.

0 points
0
0
ricky's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:36 pm

RAS scores are for underwear warriors. Just give me a football play. Someone who has an intensity when he plays, but still plays under control. Someone who can analyze a play in an instant, and react, getting to the ball at the same time as the competition, and disrupt the play. A guy who has a hard nose and a mean attitude. A guy who plays faster on the field than he does when running in a straight line, or jumping from a standing position. I want a sure tackler who can stop a ball carrier cold in his tracks. Give me a football player.

4 points
4
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:07 pm

This^^^^^!

Savage is a great RAS, but has regressed as a player. I would LOVE to hear a GB coach explain what that is all about.

Definitely agree that there are plenty of great players that aren’t bigtime RAS guys, and I think safety, especially, is a spot where a guy with the attributes you mentioned can excel.

1 points
1
0
lou's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:38 pm

The Packers Beat Writer for the Athletic said it best today "Green Bay’s top two safeties are Darnell Savage Jr. and Rudy Ford with Adrian Amos still an unrestricted free agent. Opposing offenses will salivate seeing those two lined up on the back end". Our GM has brought in some outstanding defensive players via free agency (Campbell-Douglass-Nixon-Reed) but giving Savage the 5th year option early last year was a huge mistake and it appears they have to live with it one more year because he has virtually no trade value with the guaranteed contract. Hopefully there is a sleeper in the draft and/or Douglass is moved to safety and they take advantage of his ability to play the ball.

1 points
3
2
stockholder's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:54 pm

They'll find their safety.
I Just hope they don't take him in rd. 1
Robinson would be a great choice!
I'd also consider DJ Turner at FS safety.
Elite speed, smart and can solo tackle.

1 points
2
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 03, 2023 at 03:01 pm

Syd Brown ( 4.47), or Robinson( 4.59). Get a guy with some smarts.

1 points
2
1
stockholder's picture

April 03, 2023 at 04:52 pm

If they can get both. rd 3. - 4
I'm all for it.

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:09 pm

I get it!
In addition, it would help if GB had about 19 selections in this year’s draft. 😬

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 04, 2023 at 11:14 am

Trade back, twice. Also if we end up getting both Jets 2023 2nd rounders, trade back with #43 to later in 2nd. We can pick and choose Safeties at that point plus getting extra picks. I don't think 19 picks is doable. But 13 could be including potential trades back up later.

Maybe the bigger thing is trading back will be cheaper for a cap strapped team like Green Bay. Signing 3 or 4 2nd rounders would be cheaper than 2 first round picks. Plus very little drop in talent. It's crazy that our salary cap issues could be a factor in choosing a first round pick, but it is.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:25 pm

Yes, I have the other Edge,or a safety in those spots, but they need to get multiple shots in rd two. Syd Brown will be the best safety from this group and go in the second. Lovie put them in a pro system. Kerby Joseph was his running mate. Devon Witherspoon and Jartavious Martin as the CBs. The whole group will be starting in the NFL.

0 points
0
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 03, 2023 at 01:58 pm

Believe strongly that the team cannot afford to over reach at any position including safety to try plugging a hole. Smart drafting for the long-term is what the team needs. If the talent does not match the need then draft the BPA, or trade back to where talent meets draft choice.

With that being said, on defense I am taking DL & Edge long before Safety. Stop the run & put pressure on the QB ranks first and foremost to me.

0 points
2
2
TKWorldWide's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:12 pm

All things equal, I agree DL and Edge before safety.
But!
If the DL is Justin Harrell, and the Edge is Jamaal Reynolds, and the safety is Ed Reed…

2 points
3
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:32 pm

Ouch!

2 points
2
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 03, 2023 at 09:19 pm

But you get it, right?

2 points
2
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 04, 2023 at 09:15 am

TK,
Thanks for dredging up such wonderful memories?

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 04, 2023 at 11:53 am

Trying to avoid history repeating itself. 😉

3 points
3
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 03, 2023 at 02:08 pm

Clarity on this would be helpful for me!

Maybe I have just missed it, but here is a question I just don't feel has been adequately addressed.

Aaron Rodgers went on McAfee and said he 'wants to play for the Jet's!'

Right now in the potential trade of AR there are only the Jet's who are supposedly involved, which is impacting his potential trade value. Is this because Aaron Rodgers is unwilling to consider another team, or is it because there are just no other suitors for Aaron Rodgers? My assumption it is because AR is saying he will play for the Jet's.

Is there anything in his contract that gives him control over where he will play, or is it simply fear that if he isn't traded to the team he wants to play that he might retire? Clarification on this would be great!

Is this a situation the Packers need to push the envelope and open the trade possibilities calling Rodgers bluff for playing only for the Jet's?

Thanks!

-3 points
1
4
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 02:52 pm

No, but he can just tell a suitor he’s going to retire. Essentially he has a veto. I’ve said many times, if he pushes it and the jets deal falls, he could force us to cut him before the season starts.

0 points
2
2
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 03, 2023 at 03:40 pm

So a $40 million hit should he retire prior to June 1st, but can split that over next 2 seasons if he announces after June 1st?

Just surprised no other suitor (that we know of) has thrown their hat into the ring. Strange to me?

1 points
2
1
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 05:01 pm

He’s stated an intention to play for the jets. Teams are likely waiting on that to play out—Gute did say some preliminary inquires were made prior to that announcement. Rodgers didn’t invite other offers by suggesting he’d decided to play for the Jets as opposed to retiring.

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

April 04, 2023 at 03:21 am

NO!!!!!!

AR cannot be cut by the Packers at any time in any way in 2023. NO!!!!!!

AR can be cut in February of 2024, and that's ugly as sin, but doable.

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 03, 2023 at 03:57 pm

Knock.....Rodgers can play for whoever the Packers trade him to, or retire.

I think the first deadline is the start of Day 2 of the draft. If a deal can't be reached by then, then the Packers won't be getting any draft compensation in this year's draft.

At that point, it is going to occur to some people that they might be able to get Aaron Rodgers for NOTHING this year. Yes, maybe something next draft. Once you have two bidders, the price can rise. Right now, the Jets are trying to get him as cheaply as they can (because they're the Jets) and they aren't concerned that they might fumble this, like they've fumbled things over and over for 50 years.

From the Packers perspective, it's better if we don't do anything until after June 1 because it makes our salary cap situation more manageable. So if the deal doesn't get done by the start of Day Two, then I'd expect some other teams to think about acquiring him. He's not costing us any money, until the season starts and we have to exercise that option bonus, so we can be patient.

Like I said, we've go about 4 weeks before the first deadline, and then another 4 weeks until June 1. Training camps don't really start in earnest until late July.

3 points
3
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 03, 2023 at 02:08 pm

duplicate due to slow internet

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 03, 2023 at 10:04 pm

If we trade AR12 to say the Titan's, AR12 has two choices. Report and play for $59 million dollars or retire. Which do you think he would do? Kind of like JJ Watt played for the Cards his last couple of years.

AR12 said his intentions were to play for the Jet's, but if he wants to get paid, he'll play for whoever we trade him to.

2 points
2
0
KnockTheSnotOutOfYou's picture

April 04, 2023 at 09:13 am

Bird,
Ultimately that was the jist of my posts above. If the Packers cannot get fair compensation than I'd hope the Pack would open it up to everyone and if Rodgers didn't like it than he has a big decision to make, but the Packers shouldn't pamper him.

1 points
1
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 04, 2023 at 12:11 pm

I would love for a team to leak they were interested in AR12 a couple days before the draft. Say the Commanders or Titans were to say they were interested in a draft day trade for AR12 48 hours before the draft. What do the Jets do?

Especially, the Titans or Colts.

If one other team were to profess admiration and desire for AR12's sevices, the Jets would be forced to step up their game. Right now, nothing is forcing the Jet's hand.

All that changes if a team were to enter the fray for AR12 just before the draft.

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

April 03, 2023 at 02:09 pm

3 teams list Safety as a NEED.
NO, GB, and you might be interested in
this one. Yes- The NY Jets need a SAFETY.
Guess who gets to pick in front of the packers?

0 points
2
2
Untylu1968's picture

April 03, 2023 at 03:17 pm

If they were crazy enough to grab one at 13, they may just be doing us a favor..?

2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

April 03, 2023 at 04:57 pm

They will go Ot or Wr. LB , S.
I say Safety 2nd rd.

0 points
1
1
jannes bjornson's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:29 pm

Edge or WR then TE,S...

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

April 03, 2023 at 08:12 pm

No teams list S as a need.
No team publicizes or confirms its needs.

4 points
4
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

April 04, 2023 at 03:24 am

And the Jets don't need a safety. They have Clark (who I wanted Gute to nab despite his $4.14M cap number) and Jordan Whitehead. They aren't elite but they are solid. Perhaps a third safety might be nice for depth - IDK if the Jets think they have a candidate from the old internal improvement department already on the team.

0 points
0
0
Packer_Fan's picture

April 03, 2023 at 02:13 pm

I don't know. There was something wrong with the defense last year. Was it poor play or some consternation created by the coaches. Everything was rosy during camp and preseason. Then the season started and things fell apart. And during the 5 game losing streak it appeared the players gave up. They recouped during the winning streak and again laid an egg during the Detroit game. There were stretches where they couldn't get off the field. And if I see another third and three with the DBs playing off ten yards I'll gag.

Defense is so much more a team thing where the defense is effective when everyone does their job. And it doesn't take three years for a coordinator to have a defense playing well.

We know the offense will struggle some. But does anyone know how the defense will perform? One can't predict when the players and coaches aren't aligned.

3 points
4
1
Lphill's picture

April 03, 2023 at 02:44 pm

Joe " softee" Barry was what was wrong last year and will be this year.

1 points
2
1
greengold's picture

April 03, 2023 at 04:04 pm

I'm 100% in on :
S JL Skinner - Boise St. R2-3
6-3 209 4.55 78” wingspan

Elite 37.8 QB rating when targeted as a Senior. Enforcer. Absolute hammer in run support w burst. Quicks rather than fast, but has speed to cover a lot of ground quickly. Solid both zone & man. Ball skills to create TOs.

Rare physical gifts.
__

S Ronnie Hickman - Ohio St. R4
6-0 209 4.45

Can play multiple roles. Very physical player. QB rating when targeted 34.4. Fluid center fielder who flys. Ball skills. + blitzer & run D. Ideal blitzer. Can run deep. Instincts to anticipate plays at yd. marker & red zone.

__

S Quindell Johnson R5-6
6-0 200 4.49

Volume production Safety who can cover and run D. Ranger who covers a lot of ground. Pop as tackler. Speed as single high or field-safety with man & zone experience. Memphis career: 226 Solo Tackles, 94 Assists, 320 Total Tackles, 15.5 TFL, 1 Sack, 10 INT, 24 PD, 3 FR, 4 FF.

*****
I'm a huge Tarvarius Moore fan. Never played his natural position S with SF - they tried converting him to CB immediately post draft as a rookie. Moore will be 2 years removed from successful Achilles surgery. I think there's a good chance he'll surprise.

-1 points
0
1
Leatherhead's picture

April 03, 2023 at 04:08 pm

Here's the story on the safety position. We play two, sometimes three, and dress out 4, carry 5 on the 53.

Right now, those 5 would be Savage, Ford, Ford, Gaines, Moore.

Amos has not yet signed with anybody, and he's counting $8 million against us. IMO, the simplest solution is to extend him and convert the pro-rated signing bonus to salary. I do not know how much his value is, but Spotrac calculates it at about $20 million for 3 years, meaning for another $12 million over three years we could keep this guy who isn't 30 yet.

Branch is the best of the bunch, the only legit first round safety in this draft. We'd probably have to take him with our first pick. There are several safeties that could be had on Day 2 and I'd be in favor of taking one.

-3 points
0
3
BirdDogUni's picture

April 03, 2023 at 05:00 pm

Tyrell Ford is listed as a CB. (Not saying he isn't a safety)

Tariq Carpenter is listed as a Safety though... 6' 3" 230 lbs.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 05:13 pm

Tyrelle Ford is a CB. Small school, 4.42 40 at the CFL combine at 188 pounds. One year in the CFL, mostly on STs as a 2nd round pick. He’s still under contract to the Blue Bombers if he doesn’t make the team. Not sure I have not seen any suggestion that we plan to convert him, or obvious reason why he would be a candidate to move to S.

Tarique Carpenter, whom we drafted last year is missing from that list, as is James Wiggins, whom we signed in a futures contract. Wiggins is a player who ran 4.42 at his pro day. He looked great early and then missed a big chunk of college through injury. Wiggins might actually be an interesting pick up to watch in camp.

Tony Pauline:

Positives: Two-year starter who missed the 2019 season with a torn ACL. Explosive and athletic safety who is best between the numbers. Breaks down well, effectively uses his hands to protect himself, and quickly makes his way upfield defending the run.

Effective facing the action in coverage, tracks the pass in the air, and nicely times pass defenses. Shows good hands for the interception. Does a good job reading as well as diagnosing, and generally, plays instinctive football. Explodes through gaps defending the run and aggressively lays his shoulders into defenders.

Negatives: Struggled with injuries the past two years. Lacks great top-end play speed. Does not possess great range at safety.

Analysis: Wiggins is a hard-hitting safety with a large upside who can flourish in the proper scheme. He projects as a zone or strong safety and should flourish on special teams.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 03, 2023 at 05:20 pm

Not disputing he's a CB, but the Packers.com roster has him as a S.

We've got Savage, Ford, Gaines. I suspect we'll get Amos back, and we'll add a Safety on Day Two of the draft.

-1 points
0
1
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 05:32 pm

Packers.com lists Tyrelle Ford as a CB on their current 2023 player roster list.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:09 pm

Spotrac. It was Spotrac where I saw him at Safety.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 05:04 pm

Amos can’t be extended, his contract voided, terminated. That cap hit is now set in stone. We could sign him again, but that means paying him more on top of the now dead cap like any other FA.

3 points
3
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

April 04, 2023 at 03:29 am

Indeed. That ship sailed.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

April 04, 2023 at 08:44 am

"Savage, Ford, Ford, Gaines, Moore." I see a ready need for 2 additions at Safety, and it would be smart to select that projected starting duo now, if possible.

R2-R4 will bear some very good players with a wide range of size/speed/pedigree.

I almost like these Safeties available in the later rounds better than Branch & Johnson. If we're not on this early enough though, they'll get picked over quickly. I like the idea of Skinner paired any of Robinson, Hickman, Brown. I find Quindell Johnson intriguing late Day 3.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 04, 2023 at 08:45 am

Doublin' down over here!

As long as we're here, we can glean Joe Barry wants his Safeties to be more like Swiss Army knives. To me, I see an unwavering from Barry in this regard, and I think that carried over to our CBs as well in 2022. That's the only thing I can think of that would piss Jerry Gray off enough to have his guys play against Barry's wishes.

Seems our DBs, all of them, were often times mandated by Barry to play to their weaknesses, and not to their strengths last season.

That baffles the bejesus outta me. But, he's still here, and our needs at S and CB might be more urgent than we know. >>> Add scheme specific, do-it-all players.

My gut tells me Stokes will be out a while, and may not return to what he was at his best. CB is a legit need. DJ Turner can play zone & press alike.

Add to this Adrian Amos not having his contract renewed, Savage falling into an abyss, and the stage seeming too big for Ford, I'd just as soon add a new starting tandem at S in this draft. Safeties equally adept to range, cover and bring it in run stop. I think those players can be found in this draft.

Adding Moore helped ease tension at S immensely, but, that was classic Gutekunst hedging his bets. I think we add his clone in Skinner at FS, and a more compact ranger who can cover and pop like Robinson.

0 points
0
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 03, 2023 at 04:10 pm

The Raiders were the only other reported team interested in Rodgers, so the Jets are probably THE suitor for the Diva. I hope the trade gets done before the draft so we have the extra picks and because it just feels like the longer it takes the better chance it blows up.

The only real alternative option for the Jets would be Lamar since that debacle is also still going. I can see the Ravens caving for an offer from the Jets of Wilson and their 2024 1st with some extra players when there are no more options for either team. It would be a catastrophe if our trade didn't happen. More so for Green Bay because we would get nothing in return when we could have had such a haul last year.

No need to draft a safety in 1st or 2nd rounds. The need is there but the value isn't. There should be extra picks from the Jets if the trade happens, but either way we should trade back from #15 for extra picks that would be right where the Safeties will come off the board. The Broncos were also in need of Safety, According to Draftek, but they have very few picks. Green Bay should offer Savage for Broncos TE Albert Okwuegbunam or send them a 7th rounder for him. If they take Savage we save $$ and if they take the pick thats cheap for a starting TE that we need badly.

Okwuegbunam or Ruckert, we need a cheap experienced TE.

-3 points
0
3
BirdDogUni's picture

April 03, 2023 at 05:51 pm

Troy Polamalu just happens to be featured on NFL Films right now. That dude may have had the best instincts of any safety ever. I know there have been some great ones. (Ed Reed comes to mind, but Polamalu was otherworldly, IMO.)

If only Gutey could find one with those instincts, we'd be good for a while anyway.

3 points
3
0
Oppy's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:18 pm

It's not instincts, jesus told Polamalu what to do.

Just ask Ike Taylor.

0 points
0
0
Fubared's picture

April 03, 2023 at 06:26 pm

5'11? Your water boy is 5'11 not your safety going up against 6'3 receivers all over your division. We've tried this before 8t don't work. I still say Stokes sucks at corner, he should be moved to safety, has the size and speed to handle it. He could be very good at this. Gives his pea brain more time to process the play. he is too slow mentally in the corner.

-5 points
0
5
PatrickGB's picture

April 03, 2023 at 06:59 pm

Someone with a supposed “pea brain” has no business playing safety. Safety’s are more than failed corners. True, he does have some speed but a team needs a player who can diagnose plays and react swiftly and with authority. For example, Savage has speed but that does not mean he is a great safety. BTW, Eric is listed at six foot.

3 points
3
0
TKWorldWide's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:20 pm

Totally agree, Patrick.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

April 03, 2023 at 09:46 pm

CBs are more valuable than Safeties, according to how they’re drafted and paid. If a guy can play corner, you leave him there.. Safeties have a bigger role in run support and you’re looking for fast guys who can tackle. If they’re smart and have instincts, that’s the whole package. Half of your defense are DBs and they’re the half that get most of the tackles and turnovers. And they get hurt, so it’s impossible to have too many guys who can cover and tackle.

Savage is not a great safety, but worse safeties than him start every week .

0 points
1
1
TKWorldWide's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:20 pm

I know he is not the ultimate answer, but what is Vernon Scott’s current status?

0 points
1
1
Leatherhead's picture

April 03, 2023 at 09:57 pm

I think he was injured, got a settlement and cleared waivers. Spotrac shows him as still being under contract, but I have no expectation that he’ll play for us again.

We usually have 5 DBs on the field, and right now that would be

Alexander
Douglas
Stokes
Savage
Ford.

We dress 9, so that means that Nixon and three others are the backups. One more on the 53.

It looks pretty good to me until injuries kick in.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 11:25 pm

The league lists him as a Packer. My suspicion is that after he reverted, he has not passed his physical or reached a settlement. As far as I can figure out, he never came off the injured reserve after reversion after being unclaimed after being waived injured, thus he technically remains a Packer (and their responsibility) as a result of the CBA. However, he is not listed on the roster because he was previously waived and not reinstated. At least that’s my best guess. If he does pass a physical he could be in our plans or not.

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

April 04, 2023 at 04:18 am

Scott was waived injured on August 23 and cleared waivers on August 24, thus reverting to IR, where he stayed for the rest of the year.

The Packers could have released him in February or early March but elected not to do so. The only consequence to releasing him would have been accepting a $20,000 dead money hit. Both OTC and Spotrac list his contract as active. I can find no mention of Scott in Packers Transactions or NFL transactions after August24. I assume that the Packers never waived Scott. I don't know why packers dot com does not list him on the roster: he is easy to forget, having played just 17 snaps in 2021 and being a healthy scratch for 14 of the 17 games.

It is not clear whether Scott passed his exit physical. I don't think it matters. He will either pass or fail his physical when he reports this year. The Packers will not be responsible for him if he can't pass his entrance exam. There is no way GB would invite a $1M cap hit on IR or PUP - they can't afford it.

2 points
2
0
Wilment's picture

April 03, 2023 at 07:47 pm

Sort of frightening this season as we glance around at some positions and see we arent thin, but anorexic. The cupboard is bare at safety and tight end, and not much better at wide receiver and quarterback-not a slap at love, but we need a backup I dont remember a season in recent history with this many positions needing bodies GO PACK GO

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

April 03, 2023 at 08:33 pm

Well, Wil, we have 10 picks not counting whatever happens with AR12. So, if Gutey doesn't crap the bed, we should at least get a bit of help, right?

I think we'll be alright.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

April 03, 2023 at 11:33 pm

Actually, it’s reminiscent of where we were when Murphy took over and TT’s health issues admitted.

1 points
1
0
WD's picture

April 04, 2023 at 06:24 am

The league has evolved to the point where WRs are running much faster than ever before. It is folly to put people in the defensive secondary who can not run under a 4.5 forty. This years crop of safeties was a major disappointment (particularly at the combine). Contrary to that, the DL/edge and CB positions are loaded. There are two ways to improve the pass defense 1) improve the players in the secondary or 2) improve the pass rush. The logical choice this year would be to address the pass rush with linemen who can not only rush the passer but stop the run as well. That is why we need to go DL/Edge with our first round pick. The Aaron Donald clone Calijah Kancey is my favorite choice if there at #15. I saw one mock mock draft that had him going to Detroit after the Packers pick....ouch!

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

April 04, 2023 at 07:47 am

The ultimate answer takes some digging to sort out. I’m more in alignment with stockholder in - where - the Safety chips fall: R2-R4.

Play along with me here: After considering GB options in a scenario the Packers gets 13, 42, 43, pop two of the most dynamic TEs straight off the board, in Kincaid & Washington, 13 & 15...

The value for Safety is R3.

WR is the sexy pick that doubles as a punch in the face to AR, in R1, but, is it the smart play? No. That path’s odds point to bust land.

EDGE is one of the deepest positions in this draft, and that best value mark may be found in R2-4. The very top EDGE will be gone by 13.

The Packers want to positively affect their offense, and adding Kincaid and Washington up top fills not just one, but two needs, considering Washington is likely the best blocker in this draft, as effective as an OL. Kincaid is the best move TE, 100%. Adding both might be just what the doctor ordered.

I see pairs needed at TE, EDGE, S and to a lesser degree OL (probably ticks up if NYJ gets 2 or more of our OL in trade).

Both players are worthy of each slot R1, especially so going to the same team.

That would leave 4 Day 2 picks to add players like JL Skinner -and - Robinson, while also adding a CB like Turner, maybe an EDGE or OL, then infilling our remaining needs Day 3.

I like your logic there, stockholder. Credit where credit’s due.

Imagine a start like this, Day 1-2:

13 TE Dalton Kincaid
15 TE Darnell Washington
42 S JL Skinner
43 EDGE Isaiah Foskey
45 EDGE Felix Anudike-Uzomah
78 S DJ Turner

This start to our 2023 draft alone would help our O & D immensely. Savage gets moved out of the starter, or Turner simply get groomed to take over. All 3 Safeties on the field would often be a thing… and maybe 4 with Moore.

That would make for a very solid group at Safety, while significantly bolstering TE & pass rush.

Also, I doubt Gutekunst will be finished trading once this AR trade dust settles. He'll exhaust every avenue to improve the talent on this team. UDFA, Roster Cuts, Trade Deadline.

-1 points
0
1
golfpacker1's picture

April 04, 2023 at 11:40 am

Green, do i understand it right that Moore actually played the Safety position in college that Green Bay needs? And San Fran wrongly decided he needed to be a CB instead? It seems in the pros especially, the position switch teams make is slower, bigger CB to Safety. As I understand he is pretty fast. Is he talented enough to be a starter @ Safety or just special teams contributor?

How do you rate Jordan Battle? He is not as fast as Brown but is bigger and has a pretty strong resume playing well in the best conference in college football. He seems like a better tackler as well.

Also do you know if the Rodgers trade were to be official after June 1st, when we could split the cap hit over 2 years, would it open substantial cap room to sign free agents?

1 points
1
0
golfpacker1's picture

April 04, 2023 at 06:38 pm

Multiple reports tonite from different sources that San Francisco has been talking with Green Bay about trading for Rodgers if the Jets deal fall through. That is great news if true to get another "Bidder" into this trade. That could force the Jets to offer something worthwhile.

I don't know what kind of trade offer the 49ers could throw out. They have no 1st or 2nd in 2023. They have three 3rd rounders but they are at the end of the 3rd. They have no 4th rounders either, but they have three 5th rounders. Maybe they offer all three 3rds plus two 5ths this year and a 2024 1st rounder which would be late in 1st round. I'm not sure what players they have that could sweeteners.

-1 points
0
1