The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Eagles vs Packers

Aaron hands out the Good, the Bad and the Ugly for the Packers Week 4 loss to the Eagles.

Here are my Good, Bad and Ugly for the Week 4 loss to the Eagles. 

Give us yours in the comments below!

2 points

Comments (26)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
GBPDAN1's picture

September 27, 2019 at 10:35 am

The good; Rodgers, D. Adams, K. King, Jimmy G (aside from the one hand TD attempt) .

The Bad. RUN D, Kickoff team in first half, 4th quarter first and Goal offense.

The ugly: Injuries

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Kathy325's picture

September 27, 2019 at 11:22 am

I am completely satisfied From nfltvnow ! No channel was freezing so far and even channel requests are tried to offer.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
FakeAaronNagler's picture

September 27, 2019 at 01:21 am

Good: Pass game getting into rhythm. Offensive scripts: 3rd week in a row scripted plays led to opening drive TD
Bad: Run Defense/ DL getting absolutely destroyed. Passing 4 times when it’s 1st and goal at the 1. Failures in the redzone.
Ugly: Injuries, officials not calling PI when LeFluer challenged. NFL is going to have to explain that one to me.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
FakeAaronNagler's picture

September 27, 2019 at 01:22 am

Also bad: kickoff coverage...

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
edp1959's picture

September 27, 2019 at 05:06 am

Good: #12, Adams
Bad: A Jones, he is not a running back. They need to find one. Defense. Special Teams
Ugly: A Jones, he is not a running back. They need to find one. Defense. Special Teams

+ REPLY
-5 points
0
5
Lphill's picture

September 27, 2019 at 05:33 am

Good Rodgers , he did everything he could to win , King and Graham had bounce back games .
Bad , officiating, Mason Crosby , Blake Martinez, Run defense .

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

September 27, 2019 at 06:03 am

All what Aaron said and

Excellent: Davante Adams
Good: Alex Light, Kevin King, Savage, Graham, G-Mo
Bad: Run D, choice of call which was intercepted, efforts, Packers running game
Ugly: Zebras, Jim Schwartz D, Packers ST (is Ron Zook back?)

+ REPLY
2 points
3
1
WinUSA's picture

September 27, 2019 at 06:28 am

The BAD... Rashad Gary’s stats for the game: ZERO tackles, ONE assist!!!!!!!!!!!! This was a Number ONE draft pick!!!!

+ REPLY
-1 points
1
2
mnklitzke's picture

September 27, 2019 at 06:44 am

Not true I saw Gary make a tackle. If your going to call a rookie out, or expensive free agents didn't do anything.... defense as a whole was horrid.. Not just Gary.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
JerseyAl's picture

September 27, 2019 at 02:42 pm

Gary played only 18 snaps. In 52 snaps, Preston Smith had 1 tackle and one assist. Does he suck also then? At least have some idea of what you're talking about before you post.

+ REPLY
3 points
3
0
Razer's picture

September 27, 2019 at 06:37 am

Not sure what Packer fans expect from this team. The Eagles win is exactly who we are.

We were not built to run the ball. Our O-line is good at pass protection and weak at run blocking. It was drafted, built and taught that way. We haven't drafted a RB higher than the 4th round in modern history. To complain about the lack of a run game against a very good D-line is just crying at our own missteps.

Having only one guy to throw to also should not surprise the Packer faithful. Haven't we been talking about the lack of weapons, no number 2 WR and deficiencies at TE for a couple of years now. Have you forgotten?

Finally, why should we think that our D-line makeover with Tyler Lancaster and Dean Lowry is going to make us stout against a good running team - especially when we have one linebacker in the mould of AJ Hawk. When forced to respect the opposing QB, good O-lines will continue to dominate us. This has played out repeated over the last half decade

Give Gutekunst another year before enough holes have been filled to compete against the top teams in this league

+ REPLY
6 points
6
0
baldski's picture

September 27, 2019 at 08:05 pm

I would say Gute will need at least 2 years to make some differences and I will look for 3 to 4 years to become a contender.

+ REPLY
-1 points
0
1
packerbackerjim's picture

September 27, 2019 at 06:54 am

Good: Rodgers-Adams connection.
Bad: Failure to run Jones up the middle from the one after first and goal. Honorable Mention: FGs instead of TDs in the first half.
Ugly: Really Butt Ugly: Officials not ejecting #96 Eagles.
As egregious a play I’ve seen in the past few years.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Zim5's picture

September 27, 2019 at 07:12 am

The Good: Rodgers, Adams, Allison
The Bad: Special Teams
The Ugly: Dean Lowry. The dude got walked around wherever the Eagles wanted him to. He was on skates all night.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
rstain99's picture

September 27, 2019 at 07:35 am

good Rodgers! the bad running game where is this going? Ugly is the run defense, my god think they need to go back to tackling and playing more stout at the line. They were Swiss cheese like the past 8 years. Blake Martinez is going to be worn out soon, he can't do it all by himself. Pettine certainly needs to re boot soon, Vikings torched them, Broncos as well. There is the model. I felt so great after Bears game stopping the run first and foremost not now

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

September 27, 2019 at 08:16 am

Good: Adams
Bad: Defense, all of them
Ugly: Redmond he's the best they have?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

September 27, 2019 at 09:11 am

Good: Rodgers, Adams, Bakh, King

Bad: Run defense, Graham one handed attempts to catch the ball, officiating.

Ugly: Run offense and injuries.

Good time for a mini-bye. Thanks, Since ‘61

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dfarmer's picture

September 27, 2019 at 09:31 am

Why in hell was Barnett not ejected????

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Doug Niemczynski's picture

September 27, 2019 at 09:47 am

Kudos to Kevin King !!!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Doug Niemczynski's picture

September 27, 2019 at 09:48 am

The offense still looks on disarray....Hopefully time cures all wounds.

+ REPLY
-1 points
0
1
Doug Niemczynski's picture

September 27, 2019 at 10:27 am

The run game would work better with both Jamaal Williams- and Aaron Jones. Williams runs great between the tackles. Jones better at running outside, both catch the ball good.

I also like Vitale. J. Williams was badly missed. The Packers talent is there, but details in execution is poor. I thought the Packers should have gone back to Lazard for TD

+ REPLY
-1 points
0
1
PatrickGB's picture

September 27, 2019 at 10:27 am

I now hate Swartz. I hope time wounds all heals. That was dirty football.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Doug Niemczynski's picture

September 27, 2019 at 10:31 am

I would have
challenged that interception. looked like mvs got wrapped up before the catch.

+ REPLY
0 points
1
1
endzonepacker's picture

September 27, 2019 at 01:17 pm

Your right, I feel he was wrapped up as well. But, in the last 2 min the challenge has to come from the booth.. Coaches can't challenge... and besides, what good are challenges when they didn't overturn the red flag challenge earlier in the game when they had a chance to get it right they didn't!!

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
Doug Niemczynski's picture

September 28, 2019 at 09:30 pm

I know. It sucks.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0
splitpea1's picture

September 27, 2019 at 01:04 pm

Ugly: How on earth can you not mention the Packers' goal line offense in the fourth quarter? To engage in all those passing follies--well, that's just embarrassing! I, being my dumb fan self, could have figured out a way to get the ball in. Sneak it. Jump over the pile. Dive under a lineman's legs. Use the fullback. Put three or four bodies in the backfield and either run it or fake the defense out with a pass. Do anything other than what the Packers did. Does MLF have any imagination whatsoever? I'm starting to question whether or not he's the right guy for the job.

Ugly: Lowry, Lancaster, Martinez. Looks like we have a problem here. More high draft picks on defense coming. Good, stout defensive lineman don't grow on trees. And time to stop treating the inside linebacker position as an afterthought.

Ugly: Can't convert short yardage on the ground=guard problems. Athleticism is nice, but at least one of these guys has to be a bulldozer.

Ugly: The entire game in general. Yes, Rodgers was spectacular at times, but this was just the kind of game I was hoping the Packers were past. Being totally dependent on the quarterback's heroics is not progress.

Good: The undefeated bubble has burst and the team now has a more realistic assessment of its capabilities.

Good: A little extra time to prepare for Dallas--they're good, but they haven't played anybody yet, either. Here is a perfect time to come up with a ball-control game plan to keep their offense off the field as much as possible. Also extra time to work on the kickoff coverage--we can't afford to give up short fields.

+ REPLY
1 points
1
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.