Packers Shock the NFL, sign Martellus Bennett

Not many skill position players have the luxury of going from one future Hall of Fame quarterback to another in the span of a year.

For Martellus Bennett, it's just another day in March.

The former Patriots tight end will sign with the Green Bay Packers, as multiple sources reported Friday afternoon. The details of the contract weren't immediately released, however, ex-Packers tight end Jared Cook was estimated to make $3.4 million per year this offseason. Rather than attempting to retain Cook, the Packers let him walk, and within moments of the news breaking that the Packers lacked interest, it was reported that Bennett was joining the team.

Bennett is celebrating his 30th birthday on Friday with his new deal and is just about a month older than Cook.

Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers was an advocate in keeping Cook in town, saying at the end of the season that retaining the 6'5" tight end should be "prioritized" over the offseason. Consequently, Rodgers posted a graphics interchange format (GIF) on his Twitter of him fist-bumping a Packers scout on the sideline with a caption reading his infamous "r-e-l-a-x" line. It's safe to say he's not too upset with the Bennett move.

Bennett, a Super Bowl champion, is coming off a season in which his Patriots won it all over the Atlanta Falcons — the team who stampeded over the Packers in the NFC Championship game. Over the course of his first and only season in New England, Bennett caught a career-high seven touchdowns and posted a 75.3 catch percentage, also a career-best. His 12.7 yards per reception catching passes from Patriots signal-caller Tom Brady was his most since his 2008 rookie season in Dallas.

It was the first move for a true unrestricted free agent Packers general manager Ted Thompson has made since March of 2012.

While the defensive side of the ball remains unaddressed aside from Nick Perry's monster new contract, the Packers stand pat on offense, giving Rodgers a 6'6" security blanket as they gear up for what else is to come this offseason.

ADDENDUM: 

 

Packers sign Bennett for less than the money they were discussing with Jared Cook:

__________________________

Zachary Jacobson is a staff writer/reporter for Cheesehead TV. He's the voice of The Leap on iTunes and can be heard on The Scoop KLGR 1490 AM every Saturday morning. He's also a contributor on the Pack-A-Day Podcast. He can be found on Twitter via @ZachAJacobson or contacted through email at [email protected].

NFL Categories: 
0 points

Comments (102)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:30 pm

I thought for sure we were just playing hardball with Cook and would sign him in the end. Had no idea TT had a trump card up his sleave.

Now can we please lay off the 'TT doesn't do FA' fallacy? Can everyone take a deep breath for a few days and stop crying in their beers? At least hold our judgement until the summer?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:34 pm

"It was the first move for a true unrestricted free agent Packers general manager Ted Thompson has made since March of 2012."

Lay off of TT !! Are you kidding?-- You do know that this is 2017?
I want an UFA to help the "D".

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:35 pm

We're 36 hours into free agency. Just signed Bennett. Chill.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:49 pm

History pretty much indicates that TT will not sign any other UFA that can make an impact in season 2017.

I've been 'chill'in' for 6 seasons. -- If TT doesn't pick up his game or just retire, that streak will continue.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:54 pm

So which impactful FA is still out there? And how much would you sign him for?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
slit's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:58 pm

Connor Barwin; please & thank you, Ted.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
rdent's picture

March 11, 2017 at 08:06 am

Dont'a Hightower would also improve the D immeadietly.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 11, 2017 at 10:09 am

His much are you willing to sign them for?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

March 11, 2017 at 01:19 pm

This is a great signing, and just as good, if not better than Cook.
He's a better blocker and reliable catcher, and hopefully will not get as injured as Cook did. Everytime Cook fell down I was afraid he had something else wrong with him. Edge in speed might go to Cook, but if you can't get on the field, then forget all the rest. Excellent job of filling a position of NEED at a great price.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
WinUSA's picture

March 11, 2017 at 07:30 pm

Let those 6 thumbs down eat crow....just signed Kendricks. Best TE combo since Chewy and Jackson.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:31 pm

I hear Mark Murphy had something to do with this signing. bout time.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:35 pm

That sounds like a no-substance rumor that got started by folks who ran their mouths earlier in the day saying TT will never sign a big name.
Just taking a guess.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Jersey Al's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:12 pm

I agree.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

March 10, 2017 at 11:34 pm

For what its worth, it was brought up on the NFL network.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
marpag1's picture

March 11, 2017 at 12:30 am

As president and CEO of the team in question, yeah I'd guess that Murphy "had something to do with this" ... just not more than any other signing.

Heck, even this article is suggesting that this signing somehow "shocks the NFL." No, it doesn't. Ted signed Cook last year, right? Pretty sure he signed that Peppers guy, too.

The broken record falsehood that Ted "never" signs players and "will do absolutely nothing... again" has been spinning for a decade and probably won't stop soon.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
pooch's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:32 pm

After they sigh Hightower

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
EdsLaces's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:37 pm

Would u get off the Hightower thing. Ted loves our 2 young guys at that spot and is not breaking the bank on another mlb. I'd be happy with Barwin though....

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
pooch's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:01 pm

get me Hightower

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
slit's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:01 pm

Lang, Barwin, & House, and I'm good. Then we can go CB/Edge in Rds 1 & 2 of the draft.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Nick Perry's picture

March 11, 2017 at 07:04 am

Lang, Barwin, and House?? Man if that happened Packers fans should be JUMPING for joy. Must have a Vikings fan on here downvoting people. "slit" should have nothing but likes with that comment.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 11, 2017 at 08:17 am

Some people are not all that high on House...

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 11, 2017 at 01:48 pm

Guion might be. High that is.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
snowdog's picture

March 11, 2017 at 12:40 pm

House , Barwin on the cheap . CM111 in the middle . FA corner/safty . draft. Edge .

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:38 pm

It certainly wasn't "just moments" after Cook's people leaked that negotiations broke off with the Pack- that hit the airwaves live at roughly 8:30 this morning.

Still shocking! love it.
Would love it more if Cook's looking elsewhere was just a ruse and he still came home to perch in Green bay. Woud never happen, but could you imagine THAT two TE set?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Zachary Jacobson's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:59 pm

Yes, the broken off talks came this morning. But the actual reports saying Cook was completely ruling out a return to Green Bay came late in the afternoon. Around 6 EST.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:24 pm

Good sir,

I stand corrected.

-Oppy

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
jyros's picture

March 11, 2017 at 01:31 pm

Thinking Cook's agent was banking to much on the leverage of Rodger's
endorsement of Cook.
What is truly shocking is what the Bills paid for Hyde.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:38 pm

Works for me. Way better than paying Tretter and Hyde.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
MITM's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:39 pm

Thank God we brought Barclay back...

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:52 pm

Did you start a rumor earlier today that Mark Murphy had something to do with this move?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:18 pm

Barclay is worth the money just keeping him away from Minnesota. He would be an upgrade for that bunch.

*He's also a serviceable back up guard-center.*

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
slit's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:12 pm

I'd love to see what Mike Daniels would do to Barclay. Are you kidding me?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 11, 2017 at 12:43 pm

You may see that in the TC this year. You had opportunity to see that last year in TC. And year before... So, if you are interested in, visit Green Bay in TC time...

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
marpag1's picture

March 10, 2017 at 11:58 pm

One thing to remember though is that with Tretter's departure the Packers now need a backup at CENTER, and I'm not sure who else would be able to slide in there. I'm certainly no big fan of Barclay, but I think I like him better at center than guard, and certainly better than at tackle. And even with this signing he will have competition in camp and is not a lock to make the team.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
sheppercheeser's picture

March 11, 2017 at 07:12 am

It seems like every year we hear "Barclay is not a lock to make the team", and every year, there he is. I just don't get it.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 11, 2017 at 12:47 pm

Jacob Flores. He was in TC las season and Packers kept him at PS. They have high opinion on the guy. Similar body as Corey... And he is listed on the official page as Center. Check on packers.com/team /players.html

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
OrganLeroy's picture

March 11, 2017 at 02:04 pm

Patrick on the PS was a Center and will no doubt compete at Guard in TC.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:48 pm

Wanted Bennet last year but at least TT made a move. BTW. Sure looks like NE gets it. Brady is not going to be around forever. Nor is Rodgers.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
pooch's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:03 pm

Yup NE gets it they now have Brandon Cook

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
WKUPackFan's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:37 pm

NE traded for Brandin Cooks. Checking their roster for Brandon Cook.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
blue eyes's picture

March 10, 2017 at 07:52 pm

Just when i thought Ted couldn't get any dumber he does something like this...and totally redeems himself!!!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:11 pm

Totally redeems himself? For what, Favre's last years in GB when Albino Ted did nothing to improve the team? Or maybe for last year when he never even tried to sign and DBs to replace the injured guys and kinda' dipping his toe into the RB pool by trading with KC and picking up Cristine Michaels AFTER playing one game without any RBs and getting Lacy hurt worse?
Thompson couldn't carry Belechick's jock strap!
So now he might have gained a slight improvement for an already potent offense, but it's the defense that has let us down for nearly all of Thompson's tenure, where's the improvement there? Rodgers ain't getting any younger!
TT's a loser, and couldn't redeem himself in 10 more years of doing a good job if he could find a way to find his a$$ with both hands, it's great thing his contract is up in about 14 months!
F.A.T: Fire Albino Ted!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:11 pm

Take home message: there's a lot of time before the opening of camp in July. This ain't a sprint. This is just one piece.

Patience, all.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:20 pm

Amen!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:26 pm

And you're relying on ..............?
(Please don't say the draft)

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:44 pm

Jimmy John's delivery. I could really go for a #16 with hot peppers.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:51 pm

Yes draft. With a draft class so deep at pass rusher and CB, why not expect to add a few key pieces? EVERY team relies on the draft to improve their roster. Have a little faith.

And on defense it's not unreasonable to expect a number of guys with less than two years experience to make a Davante-like step in their third year. That includes Randall, Rollins, Gunter, Hawkins, Ryan, Martinez, Lowry, Clark, And Brice.

Draft and develop means you have to have more patience than a 4 year old.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:58 pm

So you HOPE that some players will get better with time.
This team has been carried by AR for years. TT is only the GM of GB because of AR. -- One draft and hope will not fix the 53 man roster.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:19 pm

EVERY team expects their young players to get better with time. The Raiders and Falcons are examples of teams that leveraged young talent to make it into the playoffs. Seattle and SF did it several years ago on their Super Bowl runs.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 11, 2017 at 08:18 am

No guarantees. Every player move made or not made is about hope.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Ryan Graham's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:54 pm

So correct Dobs. We are two days in, and so far 2 pretty nice moves made. Retained Perry and added Martellus Bennett a prospect desired the year before, for cheaper than Cook. Didn't over pay for Hyde, didn't over pay for Tretter, all while retaining Barclay for dirt cheap. That's a lot of action for the packers in the first two days of free agency and I can't complain about any of these moves. There's more to do yes, but answers will come in time. It's a long offseason.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 10, 2017 at 11:13 pm

Tretter probably is worth his contract. His injury history severely reduced his value.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 11, 2017 at 08:20 am

Worth his contract at C...nobody really knows what his value at G (where the Packers would need him) would be. Can't pay your backup C $6M/yr, can you?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 11, 2017 at 04:15 pm

I agree, Dobber. I can't pay my back-up OC $6M. Can't even pay him that much if he's my utility OL and play everywhere. I never was sold on the notion that Tretter could play OG at NFL average.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:21 pm

3 years, $18.5M. Don't know how much is guaranteed, but it sounds pretty good so far...

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Rossonero's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:27 pm

I really wanted Cook back, but am happy with this signing.

I remember in early 2015 talking on here hoping for the Packers to sign Bennett. At that time, he was coming off a 90 catch season with Jay Cutler. If he can do that with Cutler, imagine what he can do with Aaron Rodgers?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:37 pm

It's more money than I thought we'd spend on Cook, and Bennet has a substantial history of causing problems. That said, he is more talented than Cook is. It's a higher risk play, but the potential is there for this to be great. Too bad Cook is ruling out a return to GB.

This is a business, but MAN that has to hurt him. He enjoyed his time here so much.

I hope we follow this up grabbing with Barwin and House.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:49 pm

Based on what some of the other lesser TEs were bringing, this is better than market value for Bennett. More than I hoped they would spend on a TE, yes. But, all told, ahead of the market.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
slit's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:10 pm

You read my mind - Barwin & House. I really want to see Lang back too; Barclay, as the next man up, scares the crap outta me. Then go CB/Edge in Rds 1 & 2. Seriously though, doesn't Barwin fit exactly what the Packers need at the moment, for one would think, a reasonable price. Almost makes too much sense...

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:17 pm

I would like to see Barwin on the roster if the cost is reasonable.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
MITM's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:42 pm

Didnt want to lose Cook because I didnt think he would have gotten replaced, especially by Bennett. Very happy. From here on I would very much like Lacy back, fingers crossed for Barwin and House, and onto the draft. We'll see. Lang is going to command too much money, great player but I agree with not paying guards in the area of 10 per, 8-10, which he likely will get.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

March 10, 2017 at 08:48 pm

Great signing by the Packers. Bennett is an upgrade over Cook. He is also a good blocking TE. Would be nice if we could sign Cook and run two TEs sets. In any case great move by TT. Now we just need some defense. Thanks, Since '61

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:02 pm

Just hope the Pack don't ignore TE in the draft now, because there are some very good ones.

House, ho hum. He benefited from presence of Shields and Williams. If there's a good one at #29, make the pick.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
slit's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:16 pm

Evan Engram in Rd 2 would work for me. Dude ran a 4.4 40. Little is also a nice sleeper a little later in the draft.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
OrganLeroy's picture

March 11, 2017 at 02:10 pm

After his combine very unlikely Engram is there in the 2nd round. He not only ran the 4.4 @ 235lbs. but he tore up all the other drills, probably put himself in the 1st round.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Ibleedgreenmore's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:03 pm

Shocked is not the word, more amazed Cook would not accept the same deal.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:17 pm

What would lead you to believe cook was offered the same deal?

I don't believe the Packers do their business by saying, "We are willing to spend x amount of dollars for the TE"... I do believe the Packers personnel department has a massive board somewhere in the basement where they have every player in the NFL, including their own, grouped by tiers of talent level at their particular position, and probably offer contracts by using that board as a base idea of what a player is worth.

In other words, I'm pretty sure the Packers offered Cook what the packers thought Cook was worth, and I'm pretty sure that number wasn't as high as Bennet's.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
chugwater's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:25 pm

Jason Wilde tweeted that The Packers were ready to pay Cook more than Bennett. It was from an unnamed source so who really knows.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:30 pm

That seems sketchy to me.

If it is accurate, I wonder if it was a length-of-contract issue.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Finwiz's picture

March 11, 2017 at 01:26 pm

My guess is, they offered Cook a little less because of his injury history. He missed nearly 1/2 the season last year. You can't have that type of MIA for a top tier, top pay player. Best player they could have got at the position, outside of a healthy Cook. I just have a feeling Cook will be a perpetual injury risk. He runs high and takes hits.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:24 pm

I'm inclined to think keeping Cook or getting another playmaker was paramount for McCarthy. I suspect TT had his marching orders for the TE position. Cook wanted too much and they looked at their differences and said Damn we could get Bennett for just a bit more....then did it.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:25 pm

Pretty much agree.

I think the Packers tend to do their business with Packers players that are impending FAs like this:

-Internally assess what that player's true worth is

-make a modest offer

-allow that player to test the market if they so choose

-re-asses the numbers that player is seeing from the field. If it is higher but still reasonable, and they like the player, they may match

-If the Packers can not reconcile their own perceived worth of the player with some other team's relatively high offer, they allow the player to go for the money and wish him well.

I don't think there's much deviation from that cycle, unless it is a player the packers consider a "core" member of the roster. Unfortunately, i think many players have an ego that needs stroked and take the Packers' method of handling contracts the wrong way, and some get hurt/offended they are allowed to test the market and never look back.

For instance, i think Davon House would have had the opportunity to play the market and return to the negotiating table with Green Bay and got an offer. Instead, he took it personal when allowed to test the market and never turned back.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

March 11, 2017 at 05:21 am

Except in the case of David Bakhtiari...that re-sign last fall probably saved the Packers a pretty significant chunk of change (or saved them from hoping on Spriggs at LT in 2017).

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 11, 2017 at 11:11 am

core player.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

March 11, 2017 at 09:24 am

MM has always liked TE's but nothing worked at the position after Finley. They saw what speed and size did last year and said, dam, we should keep doing this.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Samson's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:31 pm

If you can't bring back Cook, Bennett is certainly better than waiting for another draft choice to develop or not develop.

Still need help on the "D". -- Big time. -- Just the draft won't do it.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

March 11, 2017 at 01:02 pm

Bennett is much better TE than Cook. Much, much better!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
zerotolerance's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:52 pm

Cook was so happy to play for a contender for the first time in his career? Then left for the money. What a pile of bullshi•. Have fun with your next stop looser.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

March 10, 2017 at 10:28 pm

He probably thought he proved his worth with his play, and was shocked he wasn't getting a better offer. I can see that angle. Also keep in mind, this could have been his agent's strategy as opposed to his own.

Lastly, who out there is tighter?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Ryan Graham's picture

March 10, 2017 at 09:59 pm

I bet Cook stays in the division, Bears or Lions my guess. Downgrade either way.

Who, in the hell, is his agent...and how did he allow for this to happen.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

March 10, 2017 at 11:27 pm

We lose the comp pick for Hyde by signing Bennett. Still have comp picks coming for Tretter and Peppers, subject to change of course.

Bennett might well be better than Cook. Bennett will have to win AR's trust this year and get comfortable with each other, and we will read articles proclaiming that - yada, yada, yada.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

March 10, 2017 at 11:37 pm

Think he already has, AR tweeted relax.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Crackerpacker's picture

March 11, 2017 at 06:50 am

If Cook does get a good deal with another team will that not be the comp pick that we lose making this deal neutral.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

March 11, 2017 at 12:16 am

Cook -Your ego got in the way of your head. Thanks, but No Thanks. Hilarious really. We have a guy that wants to be a packer, and for a fair price.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Point Packer's picture

March 11, 2017 at 12:35 am

Cooks a tard

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
ben's picture

March 11, 2017 at 02:52 am

Was a packer fan for 38 years and a viking fan for the last 3. Perry was a good move; He's is a good player with a ton more upside. Bennett is fine, but fleener or cook probably are better with more upside. Letting Hyde go was a mistake, he's a real good football player. The Vikings will have a top 1 defense next year. As in the best defense in the league. I made the right choice 3 years ago. The more i think about it, Aaron Rodgers, the best player ever, deserves the average career he's destined to have. Good for him in being able to r-e-l-a-x and accept it.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
zeke's picture

March 11, 2017 at 04:05 am

"deserves the average career he's destined to have."

Substitute "life" for "career" and you've captured the life of every Viking fan, ever.

But at least you still have the 5-0 start to last year. No one will ever be able to take that away from you.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

March 11, 2017 at 09:32 am

What a load of shit, 38 years. A Packer fan is a Packer fan for life. You switch to a team that has won what? Nothing. You're a troll, nothing more, so go to your new glass house palace, just quit throwing stones around here.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
OrganLeroy's picture

March 11, 2017 at 02:13 pm

I'll bet your real name is Moron Troll.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Nick Perry's picture

March 11, 2017 at 10:23 pm

So you REALLY weren't a Packers Fan, not if you "Switched" after 38 years and to the Vikings no less. You may have followed the Packers but a Fan? HELL NO!!! Packers Fans DON'T switch.

You were on here last season with your chest out after the first few weeks of the season but then disappeared, just like the Vikings do every December.

Until the Vikings win a Championship you don't have room to be critical. The Vikings aren't a great defense, just a very good defense. Very good defenses with offenses like that don't win SB's. I hope that 14th overall pick was worth picking up Bradford...LMAO!!!! Thanks Spielman!!!!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
zeke's picture

March 11, 2017 at 04:05 am

Deleted double post

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Packer_Pete's picture

March 11, 2017 at 06:19 am

Hate this signing. Don't get me wrong, like they addressed the position and I wasn't high on Cook. But Bennett? History of problems, causing rifts in the locker rooms. Maybe a talented player, but on a team that lacks veteran leadership, he will cause issues. And if his relationship with Rodgers will be like it was between Finley and Rodgers, then we'll all wish Ted would've signed Cook...

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
akeemthedream's picture

March 11, 2017 at 07:07 am

You're searching for reasons to not like this move.
Bennett is much better than Cook. He's also much better than Finley ever was.

Bennett brings talent and he brings AN EDGE.

The Packers need more a$$hole$.
Guys who will 1) tell you they're going to beat you, 2) proceed to beat you, and 3) tell you -to your face- how badly they just beat you.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
JHitTheB's picture

March 11, 2017 at 10:47 am

Name one issue you heard out of NE's camp about Bennett. There weren't any. He had a scuffle in practice playing for the Bears. Big whoop. You make it sound like GB doesn't have players with behavior issues. I'll take a guy throwing hands in practice over a guy shooting off his gun in the parking lot outside of a night club or answering the door for the police with a blunt in his mouth.

I think it comes down to coaching. Pretty sure NE is a much more disciplined environment than Chicago.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
sheppercheeser's picture

March 11, 2017 at 07:14 am

I'm glad that we signed Bennett, but I'm equally sad that we couldn't have hung on to Cook. I thought he was going to be in GB for a long time. Can you imagine if we could have both Bennett and Cook- gosh! But, like they say, it's a business.....

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
fthisJack's picture

March 11, 2017 at 07:53 am

when you think about it, this move is more or less standing pat with what the Packers had already. just substituting Bennett for Cook.
NOW, they need to go out and get an OLB and CB in FA and i will feel much better.!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

March 11, 2017 at 08:32 am

I can not for the life of me remember Cook's first name. Really, barely got to know him.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
4thand1's picture

March 11, 2017 at 09:35 am

Captain?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
holmesmd's picture

March 11, 2017 at 10:41 am

I was a fan of doing this last year and it was rumored Benett didn't want to play in GB. What changed? There is no reason that we shouldn't have kept Cook. He knows the offense and had developed chemistry with Rodgers. I refuse to believe that this was on Cook or his agent. It's really too bad! Benett is a very talented TE but he's also a loud mouth. I'm quite puzzled why GB would take this risk with a known commodity to save a few bucks?! Really?

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
OrganLeroy's picture

March 11, 2017 at 02:16 pm

I think it's pretty clear that the organization knows a whole lot more about doing business in the NFL then you do. Refuse to believe all you want!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
yooperman's picture

March 11, 2017 at 02:09 pm

Hey Ben, do you know what you call a drinking glass turned upside down on a table? A Minnesota Vikings trophy case!!!

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0
tincada's picture

October 29, 2017 at 10:17 am

Well well Terrible Ted showed us again his inability to put a team together. Packers TE Martellus Bennett announces plans to retire after 2017 season ! You go Ted, out the door and don't let it hit you in the ass on the way out.

+ REPLY
0 points
0
0

Log in to comment and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.