Packers Linebacker News: Brad Jones Released, A.J. Hawk Has Surgery
The release of Jones clears $3.75 million from the Packers' salary cap in 2015.
Two pieces of news regarding Green Bay Packers inside linebackers were revealed on Friday: Brad Jones was released, and it was found out that A.J. Hawk had surgery to remove bone spurs in his ankle.
The Packers parted ways with Jones after he went from starting 22 games in 2012 and 2013 to losing his place in the starting lineup, getting the nod just one time in 2014.
"We thank Brad for his contributions and dedication to the Packers over the past six years,” general manager Ted Thompson said. “We wish him all the best.”
By releasing Jones, the Packers will save $3.75 million in salary-cap space in 2015, money that will largely go toward signing the team's rather sizable free-agent class.
Jones will, however, still cost $1 million in dead money against the salary cap after signing a three-year $11.25 million deal in 2013 that included a $3 million signing bonus.
A seventh round draft choice in 2009, Jones registered 293 tackles and 10 sacks while playing in 76 regular-season games, including 36 starts. Jones was a member of the Packers' winning Super Bowl XLV team in 2011.
The other item regarding Hawk was reported by Rob Demovsky of ESPN.com.
Hawk shot down a suggestion in an interview with the media during the season that he had been playing injured despite quarterback Aaron Rodgers mentioning during his weekly radio show that Hawk had been playing hurt.
Reading between the lines, the fact that the Packers didn't also release Hawk on the same day as Jones perhaps lends credence to the notion that they may not release Hawk at all. There's nothing the Packers from doing so at a later date, however.
It's important to note that Hawk has a roster bonus of $800,000 and a workout bonus of $250,000 in 2015, although the exact date the bonuses kick in is unclear. The Packers would have to release Hawk before the bonuses kick in to avoid paying them.
One thing that's certain is if Hawk is released before the start of the 2015 league year on March 10, the Packers would save an additional $3.5 million against the salary cap, although he would still count $1.6 million in dead money.
It's possible that the Packers could renegotiate Hawk's contract and potentially bring him back if they feel as if his ankle injury severly limited his mobility.
The case for Hawk sticking around is if Clay Matthews doesn't make a full-time transition to the inside, the Packers would be entering the 2015 season with a relatively inexperienced group comprised of Sam Barrington, Carl Bradford, Joe Thomas and any other rookies or free agent additions they might add.
Although he maintained a role in the Packers' 3-4 base defense, Hawk saw his playing time decrease markedly late in the 2014 season.
Comments (38)
chaka
February 20, 2015 at 06:13 pm
Hawk is awful. Overrated. Wasted way too much money on his below average play.
NewNikeShoes
February 20, 2015 at 08:52 pm
should we sign lyerla instead and force him to be an ILB?
Just kidding, just kidding.
HankScorpio
February 21, 2015 at 06:04 am
Re-inventing the two-way player is Lyerla's destiny. He would be All Pro at both ILB and TE, without a doubt. The first 20/20 man in NFL history...20 sack and 20 TDs.
Flow49
February 20, 2015 at 07:01 pm
Hawk should have surgery to remove all that lead weight from his behind. Maybe he'd be fast enough to make a play...
Point-Packer
February 20, 2015 at 07:05 pm
Good. Brad Jones could do nothing right. The opposite of a play-maker. Overpaid.
Please dump Hawk. Good guy. Great Packer. But he's less than average at this point in his career.
Point-Packer
February 20, 2015 at 07:05 pm
Good. Brad Jones could do nothing right. The opposite of a play-maker. Overpaid.
Please dump Hawk. Good guy. Great Packer. But he's less than average at this point in his career.
HankScorpio
February 20, 2015 at 07:25 pm
According to Demovksy, the surgery on Hawk was right after the season so I'm guessing he is out of the hospital by now. The Packers not wanting to break the news when Hawk is laid up would be a class move that Hawk deserves, IMO. I'm hoping that explains the delay.
OTOH, maybe they think his mobility will be fine after the surgery. The problem with that thinking is that his mobility really never was fine. He has never really been mobile enough to be anything more than average.
GRB1531
February 21, 2015 at 06:50 am
I wonder how many Packer fans know that A.J. Hawk is the all time leader tackler for the franchise. I am not trying to compare him to Mathews but check to see how many tackles each one made after the first eight games. This was before they moved Mathews to the middle where he was more effective. Teams had figured out how to defend Mathews when he was always on the outside. Mathews had a total of fourteen tackles and A.J. had fifty nine. Lets not forget Hawk directed the defense for most of the years while we had winning seasons. You may never see another Packer break Hawk's tackle record in your life time so I think he deserves more respect than most people give him credit for.
KenEllis
February 21, 2015 at 07:32 am
I am very aware of Hawk's durability and tackle totals, because I have been forced to witness him make his soft as charmin hits for 9 years.
Never a big hit. Rarely a hit near the line of scrimmage.
And he directed the D that has generally been so bad it had prevented our prolific O from getting to the Super Bowl. In fact, the D had looked confused for much of the time AJ has "led" it.
All I need to know is that the 2014 D immediately improved once Hawk (not B. jones) went to the bench. The most overpaid Packer in my lifetime needs to be shown the door.
HankScorpio
February 21, 2015 at 10:49 am
Hawk has logged a lot of snaps at a position that is intended to make tackles. His status as all-time leader is perhaps not as telling as some other franchise records might be. What's the snap count or games played among the other franchise leaders? I bet Hawk leads those, too.
Still, I do think he has been a very reliable player for the Packers. Had he been a fifth round pick instead of #5 overall, he'd likely be beloved for his consistency and durability. Instead, he carries the burden of expectations he simply never even came close to meeting.
In the end, nobody beats Father Time. I think Hawk has lost enough to him that it is time to move on. I would not want to see Barrington and Hawk together and I think Barrington is more effective already. So that settles thing, IMO.
DrealynWilliams
February 21, 2015 at 11:52 am
Reliable, yes - if you mean available. No doubt at all.
Effective (consistently), no.
I don't think where he was drafted matters much. I haven't seen anyone ever label Hawk a bust.
Hawk was a weak link for the defense for many seasons (not all). He just never made much of an impact in all of the seasons he's started.
DrealynWilliams
February 21, 2015 at 11:59 am
1 Luke Kuechly
2 DeAndre Levy
3 Lavonte David
4 Curtis Lofton
5 Paul Worrilow
6 D'Qwell Jackson
7 C.J. Mosley
8 Lawrence Timmons
9 Morgan Burnett
10 Daryl Smith
Leading tacklers last season. Some of those guys are all over the field making tackles and some of them are all over the field making tackles AND impacting the game. Hawk just makes tackles. What's Hawks best tackling season (STAT) wise? I wonder how many of them were assisted and how many were "stops". Also, did he force any fumbles that season?
February 21, 2015 at 03:53 pm
GRB, good DEF is about making impact plays - tackles for loss, sacks, forced fumbles and interceptions; Hawk is terrific at making tackles 5-7 yards past the line of scrimmage, but he NEVER makes plays that change the course of a game - tell me how many interceptions/ff, sacks, and tackles for loss he has in the last 3 years. It's no coincidence that after they moved Mathews to the inside, and took Hawk off the field, our rush defense went from 32nd in the league to 8th. The best thing that can be said about Hawk is that he was able to avoid injury, unfortunately the Packers DEF would have been better the last several years had he been injured.
DrealynWilliams
February 21, 2015 at 04:06 pm
Damn, that last sentence was kind of harsh.
badaxed
February 22, 2015 at 05:13 pm
spot on.
4thand1
February 21, 2015 at 07:11 pm
Trouble is, Hawk is an all around great guy. Time to move on to coaching.
KenEllis
February 22, 2015 at 08:15 am
You dont't pay someone $35,000,000 because he is a great guy, you do it for his play on the field. Unfortunately, for the Packers Great Guy AJ played like Joe average (at best) while getting paid like a Hall of Famer.
ben
February 20, 2015 at 08:19 pm
Brad Jones was played out of position the last few years. His rookie year at LOLB was very very good. But like Hawk, he's not a guy you can put into a annually soft defensive middle.
Of course if you resign raji, then sign suh up front, the Packer's MLB play will improve no matter who ends up in there. (i love cobb, but sign suh, not cobb) (abbrederis is a cobb clone and the real deal if he can stay healthy, Janis is a Jordy clone and has the most upside of ANY WR on the team, Adams is a boykin clone and both are solid.)
------SUH/Datone-------RAJI/SUH/Boyd--------Daniels/Boyd/Neal-----
Peppers/Neal---1stRound/Perry---Clay/4thRound------Perry/Clay
4thand1
February 20, 2015 at 10:25 pm
I just became dumber by reading this post^^^^^^^
Irish_Cheesehead
February 21, 2015 at 04:30 pm
Just got a big laugh imagining Ted signing Suh!
KenEllis
February 20, 2015 at 07:52 pm
Slocum check.
Bostick check.
B. Jones check.
Hawk ...
Boykin ...
hybridauth_Facebook_100004084225446
February 20, 2015 at 08:46 pm
Hawk would be gone but because he had surgery he can't be released just so you no .
zoellner25
February 20, 2015 at 10:05 pm
The brad jones contract has got to be TT's worst
KenEllis
February 20, 2015 at 10:59 pm
If not jones' contract then It was Hawk's because AJ's was for even more $ and after taking a pay cut several years into the contract he remains way overpaid.
4thand1
February 21, 2015 at 07:06 pm
The trouble is Brad Jones regressed instead of improving with age and experience.
701Packer
February 20, 2015 at 10:07 pm
your move Vikings...
4thand1
February 20, 2015 at 10:26 pm
The queens will have B. Jones by tomorrow afternoon.
DrealynWilliams
February 20, 2015 at 10:51 pm
Fist pump
johnnyd17
February 21, 2015 at 07:14 am
i agree Jones needed to be gone, but feel it's unfair to blame him on the fake FG TD vs. Seattle? his job was to rush the kick, Hawk was to cover eligible receiver..was pivotal play in 3rd quarter, one of many in 2nd half...
NickPerry
February 21, 2015 at 07:15 am
Why do I have this horrible feeling Hawk is still going to be a Packer in 2015?
badaxed
February 22, 2015 at 05:48 pm
N0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
egbertsouse
February 21, 2015 at 08:49 am
I have this sinking feeling that Hawk will take another pay cut and hang around. TT just can't pass up a bargain sometimes.
AJ Hawk leading tackler!? Leads the team on jumping on piles 10 yds downfield, that's for sure.
February 21, 2015 at 03:43 pm
In order for Hawk to be a bargain, at this point, he'd have to pay Thompson.
DrealynWilliams
February 21, 2015 at 10:09 am
The only shock here is that this article doesn't have over a thousand comments already.
Irish_Cheesehead
February 21, 2015 at 04:31 pm
Brad Jones finally gone! YES! I wish him well in Minnesota.
TKWorldWide
February 22, 2015 at 01:59 pm
I am hoping that AJ's "ankle surgery" was actually a secret operation in which he had Usain Bolt's ankles transplanted in place of his own.
badaxed
February 23, 2015 at 08:32 am
Rather have the "Road Runners".
TKWorldWide
February 24, 2015 at 06:48 am
Also a good choice.