McCarthy's Tolerance For Penalties Becomes Intolerable

Following Monday's 18 yellow-flag affair, McCarthy's justification for his team's penalty problems is becoming unacceptable.

Following Monday's loss to the Chicago Bears in which the Green Bay Packers were penalized a single-game franchise record 18 times, head coach Mike McCarthy's reaction and justification to penalties has worn out its welcome.

Considering the 91-year history of the franchise, franchise records don't just happen by accident.

It would take the game of Aaron Rodgers' career to break the single-game franchise record of 5 touchdown passes. Likewise, it would be the most notable game of Donald Driver's career if he broke the single-game franchise record of 14 receptions set by Don Hutson all the way back in 1942.

I'm sure penalties weren't tracked for all 91 years in the history of the Packers, but no one needs a record book to tell them that 18 is an outrageous number.

What's also becoming outrageous is the trend developing under the leadership of McCarthy in which the Packers are one of the most heavily penalized teams in the NFL.

Since his debut season in 2006 in which the Packers ranked a satisfactory 20th in total number of penalties, the Packers have ranked 4th, 2nd and 1st (with 118 total penalties) in each successive season under McCarthy.

It's discouraging because through the first two games of the 2010 season, the Packers were tied for the fewest numbers of penalties in the NFL. A small sample size to be sure, but an improvement nonetheless.

Monday's 18-penalty barrage was a return to what has become the norm under McCarthy, an undisciplined and penalty-ridden team when it comes to their on-field play.

Even more troubling is the way McCarthy refuses to take responsibility and actions to correct this disturbing trend.

Exhibit A–McCarthy had the following to say in response to rookie outside linebacker Frank Zombo's 15-yard roughing the passer penalty on Bears quarterback Jay Cutler that wiped out a fourth-quarter Nick Barnett interception in a game which the Packers had a 17-14 lead with less than 7 minutes to go:

What do you tell your player on that particular play? He is on a pass rush, he spins inside and he spins into the quarterback, and he goes helmet-to-helmet just like the rule calls. Technically they are correct in throwing the flag there, but he is being held. He is being pulled from behind. I’m just a big believer in, ‘OK, these are the rules, let’s train our players this way. Let’s play within the rules.’ And that’s what we’ll continue to do, but when you have certain situations like that, you’ve just got to keep playing through those. His helmet hit the quarterback’s helmet, that’s a penalty. But Frank really couldn’t do anything about it.

If Coach McCarthy doesn't know what to tell young Mr. Zombo, I do.

I'd say, "Frank, if you ever commit a penalty like that again that possibly costs us a ballgame, you're going to be sitting next to me on the bench. If you commit two, you might just find yourself out of a job."

That may seem harsh, but that's also the cruel reality of the NFL in which men get paid hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of dollars per year to play a child's game.

As much as some people may disagree with the NFL's sometimes extreme protection of offensive players and particularly quarterbacks, that's a penalty by Zombo and everyone just has to deal with it.

Zombo has to lower his helmet about 6 or more inches below the quarterback's head, and he would have been just fine.

And I don't buy the excuse that he is being held or pulled from behind. I could only watch the television replay, and Zombo appears to be touched by the Bears left tackle but not held.

Apparently the referees agree that Zombo wasn't being held either. And even if he was being slightly held, it didn't seem to be anything that would impede him from lowering his helmet just a few more inches.

It's reasoning like that from McCarthy that I don't think the penalty problem is going to be fixed anytime soon. I think the problem can be remedied, but it's going to take a little more hard-lined approach with his players to get those results.

0 points
 

Comments (64)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Ruppert's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:21 pm

McCarthy is an elite QB coach, but when do we start to legitimately question whether Mike McCarthy is a good enough head coach to win the Super Bowl? I ask anyone to show me where he has improved as an NFL head coach in any meaningful way since he took this job five years ago.

0 points
0
0
PackersRS's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:37 pm

Yeah, if I had to rate MM I'd go:
*Elite QB coach, maybe the best in the league.
*Very good/great OC, a top 10 gameplanner.
*Good HC, that still has a way to go.

0 points
0
0
PackerT's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:42 pm

For once I totally agree with Brian`s article, plus McCarthey is still going to tolerate false starts and holding penalties by his "veteran" tackles.

0 points
0
0
Chad's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:44 pm

I have to disagree.

I think if you get players too worked up over certain penalties (especially in the linebacker position), then they could easily end up restraining the fire that gets them to the hit in the first place.

In other words... would you want McCarthy to say the same thing to Matthews about his facemask call? I know I wouldn't.

Some penalties are completely flagrant, some are a result of poor concentration, and some are accidents - friendly fire if you will.

There is a line to draw, but McCarthy doesn't need to excuse the ones that happen from just being aggressive in the game. He needs to address the other kinds.

The penalties I wish he *would* show some more ire over are the lapses in concentration: false starts, unwarranted holding, illegal formations, etc. In those instances, yes, he does need to threaten pulling the player.

In fact, I really wish he would have pulled Tauscher for at least a few plays after he committed back-to-back penalties. Let him get settled down and refocused, then put him back out there.

But to get all worked up over this Zombo hit is to focus on the wrong kinds of penalties. I know it was in a dire situation, and I don't have the capability to watch the play again, but I can't really fault the guy for going after the quarterback on that drive.

In short, that particular penalty needs to be addressed, but not dwelled upon. I'd rather them slam the book down on the O-line.

0 points
0
0
Chad's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:52 pm

Oh and to clarify, when I said, "McCarthy doesn’t need to excuse the ones that happen from just being aggressive in the game," I'm NOT talking about pure aggressiveness without focus. I'm talking about the good kind of aggression - the drive and fire to beat your individual battles in the game.

0 points
0
0
PackerBacker's picture

September 30, 2010 at 08:07 am

I agree completely Chad. I have no problem with this penalty. It is a aggressive play made by a LB trying to make a game changing play. It just didn't go his way this time.

0 points
0
0
Packers423's picture

October 01, 2010 at 10:25 am

This is an article with a good, if obvious, premise (penalties are bad, McCarthy needs to take them seriously) but to say McCarthy should bench or cut Zombo for the hit on Cutler is flat-out wrong and borderline ludicrous.

Chad got it right, McCarthy needs to crack down on the mental lapses that result in pre-snap penalties and ridiculous fumbles (how many times is James Jones going to do that against the Bears? I've seen 3 in the last 4 years!).
McCarthy's breakdown of the Zombo play was absolutely right, Zombo was not leading with the helmet, he just happened to make contact with it. The way the rule is written, that's a penalty. It's not the ref's or the player's (or the coach's) fault.

0 points
0
0
nerdmann's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:45 pm

Agreed Ruppert. On that particular penalty, I kind of side with MM. HOWEVER, those idiotic holding and false start penalties are not penalties resulting from an aggressive and intimidating defense. They are just drive killers, plain and simple. How many interceptions are they going to cost us? How many points are they going to take off the board?
Another issue with MM is the offensive line. EVERY SINGLE YEAR, it takes them until week 8 or 10 for them to show up. This year seems to be no different.
And special teams. They look so "special" they should arrive on the short bus.
One of my biggest criticisms of Sherman was his loyalty to his friends over the good of the team. It was more important to him to make the team a country club for the employment of us dumbass buddies like Tom Rosseley and Mike Stock than it was to hire competent people. Kurt Schottenhiemer, for instance.
Well why are James Campen and Slocum still on the staff? Slocum has gotten it done for exactly TWO games out of his entire career. Which is I suppose more than we can say for Campen.

0 points
0
0
nerdmann's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:22 pm

NOTE: Due to awkward wording, it sounds like I meant to include Kurt Schottenheimer as an example of someone who is competent. Allow me to dispel this notion. I meant him as an example of someone who left early to spend more time at the casino down the road than in the film room.

0 points
0
0
fish's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:47 pm

My Favorite Quote on Lombardi

"When Lombardi said 'sit down' we didn't look for a chair." -Forrest Gregg

0 points
0
0
bigfog's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:49 pm

Cripes, the seat's already getting hot for McCarthy?

C'mon Brian. Let's wait for next week before you can adequately say McCarthy's returned to his nonchalant attitude towards flags.

0 points
0
0
Brian Carriveau's picture

September 29, 2010 at 07:53 pm

Seat getting hot? I didn't say anything about firing the guy. And I don't think I need to wait a week when this has been going on for years.

0 points
0
0
bigfog's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:46 pm

A NFL team is what it is after week 4. Weeks 1 and 2 - minimal penalties. Week 3 - off the charts. Week 4...?

Wait a week, then write your article. Until then, it's alarmist at best.

0 points
0
0
David's picture

September 30, 2010 at 12:44 am

Actually bigfog is right.

Since you questioned McCarthy, that has to mean you want him to be fired. And since you criticized him after a loss, that means you think the season is over.

I know how this works, as I have a lot of experience with Packers blogs/forums.

You will now forever be known as a "McCarthy hater."

Now, any rational person would know, that is the furthest thing from the truth, as you're one of the more objective Packers fans there is; but once you question MM, or TT, even once, there is no going back.

I've had the "TT hater" label, ever since I questioned him for the Frost debacle in 2008, even though I have praised him several times since then. I've learned to embrace it though. Welcome to the club!

0 points
0
0
RickyBobby's picture

September 30, 2010 at 05:47 am

why do you guys hate thompson so much?

0 points
0
0
David's picture

September 30, 2010 at 07:55 am

Lol.

0 points
0
0
bigfog's picture

September 30, 2010 at 08:08 am

Yep, that's precisely what I said. Derp!

0 points
0
0
nerdmann's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:17 pm

Last year when he went 4-4 and allowed Favre to take his pants down and spank his bottom blue (TWICE,) I was calling for the hot seat. Subsequently, he did pretty much the mimimum to redeem himself.
What he has to do now is have the offensive line show up BEFORE week 8, have the special teams show up AT ALL and cut down on this disturbing trend of drive killing penalties.
One thing he did this past week is control time of possession. I believe this keeps Rodgers in The Zone. It prevents the patented MM "lulls." You all know what I'm talking about. Those need to stop, and that includes ridiculously ugly starts to games, like turning the ball over TWICE in the first three plays of a playoff game on the road. (Then blaming the defense for the loss.)
So yeah, his ass IS on the hot seat. The temperature may not be very high at this moment, but if they continue to PLAY DOWN TO THEIR COMPETITION, it's gonna get much hotter, even if they end up squeaking by these inferior teams.

0 points
0
0
ILpackfan's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:12 pm

once again Cheeseheadtv shows its the Fox news of Packer Nation putting fear into everyone after only one lose today I have read how Woodson sucks and now the Head coach who willed his team at half time of the Bills game it now become Wade Phillips and running camp happy guys I just don’t get it. You cant tell you think all of those 18 were 100% correct calls can we just calm down please you are scaring the children.. Plus Mike has dome some things to help with the penalties he brought refs in during all special teams practices to help cut them down

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:56 pm

Best. Comment. Ever.

0 points
0
0
ILpackfan's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:00 pm

Aaron don’t get me wrong love the site its the best for packer info an insight but this week has got a little crazy

0 points
0
0
CJ in Guatemala's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:32 pm

For me it was expected though. I knew everyone would react that way cause hell, "only undefeated teams win superbowls".

But on a more personal note, yesterday I was still "hot headed" about the game so I don't blame most of the people posting here being angry, "overly-nitpicking" or just flat out disappointed about the poor performance showed on Monday. I intentionally skipped packer news the whole day, even Packer Transplants, and I never do that, like ever, unless something major happens (VODs on Livestream made my decision easy :P ).

Anyway there is a WHOLE LOT OF SEASON LEFT, and lets face it, with the exception of probably the Oakland Raiders, every team's drive in this league, is to get better and correct things week in and week out.

0 points
0
0
jack in jersey city's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:14 pm

you tell 'em brian!

0 points
0
0
maxginsberg's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:31 pm

Well done, Brian.

When's the last time McCarthy pulled someone out of the game after a dumb penalty? Has he ever?

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:20 pm

No. Practice? Yes. Game? Never.

0 points
0
0
CJ in Guatemala's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:33 pm

"I mean listen, we talkin bout practice. Not a game, not a game, not a game."

0 points
0
0
Satori's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:32 pm

Brian, I truly appreciate your work, but I have to disagree with you on this one

..."Even more troubling is the way McCarthy refuses to take responsibility and actions to correct this disturbing trend...."

The first fallacy in your article is taking anything a coach says in public at face value.

MM is not going to rip his players in public, nor is he going to lay out in great detail what goes on behind closed doors.

Its kinda silly to use coach-speak comments to a reporter to indict an NFL Head Coach.

Andy Reid swore on a stack of bibles that McNabb was his guy... 24 hours before he was traded to the skins.

So lets dispense with that right off the bat and look at actions instead of words

Your article suggests that MM hasn't done anything about it or accepted responsibility for it.

I disagree with that assessment as well

You covered training camp and you know that the Packers spent more time on special teams and penalties than they ever have before. It was an area of major emphasis since March and continued through the summer.

They brought in referees to practice to assist the players in teaching them what is legal, what is not and what they are looking for on each play.

They spent extra time on both of these areas at nearly every practice, film review and during OTAs.

At some point, the players are responsible for executing their jobs correctly. Their coaches aren't teaching them to commit penalties, they made that choice on their own

As far as accountability, what is it that you suggest the HC do ?

Clifton, Tauscher, Woodson, Collins all committed penalties on MNF- are you suggesting they should all be benched to prove a point ?

And you are going to threaten to cut them too ?

I understand fans concerns and complaints, but I disagree wholeheartedly that the Packers/McCarthy have not done everything in their power to correct it.

I am still waiting to hear somebody tell me just exactly how you would hold these millionaires starters "more accountable"

Gripes are fine, let's hear a viable solution and let's give credit where credit is due.

0 points
0
0
Brian Carriveau's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:36 pm

Good point, Satori, on my neglect to mention the measures McCarthy has taken during practice.

My solution? Pull a player, bench a player, even if temporarily, and visibly show emotion on the sideline after multiple or costly penalties.

0 points
0
0
Satori's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:05 pm

Its a tough nut to crack

Where is that guy with the 183 IQ when we really need him ?

It's interesting that one of the comments about Lombardi was that he would rip a guy in public and praise him in private

MM has gone the opposite direction and laid off his guys in public while ripping them good in private

Its a different world now...

0 points
0
0
David's picture

September 29, 2010 at 10:43 pm

"MM has gone the opposite direction and laid off his guys in public while ripping them good in private"

How do you know he rips them in private?

0 points
0
0
dilligaff's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:37 pm

Is MM the greatest or best HC ever, no. Does he have flaws, yes.

Remember a lot of people where critical of Grant (can't break tackles, pass blocking, etc) 3 games without him and I am sure missing me some Grant.

One bad game, let MM clean this up, remember he cleaned things up last year.

0 points
0
0
lars's picture

September 29, 2010 at 08:39 pm

The only thing "the referees agreed on" Brian was that they would call the game in the Bears' favor. 18 penalties to 2? C'mon.

0 points
0
0
Jersey Al's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:16 pm

actually it was 5 for the Bears, but still a lopsided count, nonetheless...

0 points
0
0
cole's picture

September 30, 2010 at 09:52 am

The only penalties I had a problem with were the infuriating holding calls and false starts. McCarthey should have pulled Tauscher after two consecutive false starts on the goal line. Who is he? Flozell Adams?

The defense played well enough to win the game.

That Burnett PI call was just wrong in my opinion. I don't understand how people who say it was blatant.

The NFL instructs the refs to call lopsided games because Chicago is a bigger market and a more controversial team because of Cutler. That's my conspiracy theory anyway.

0 points
0
0
WoodyG's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:04 pm

This is the NFL .... Not HS ....

AR was flagged for intentional grounding on the play before James Jones's fumble ..... Let's suspend AR for the Lions game & if he does it again at anytime during the season ..... Cut him ..... LOL.

You & Nagler need to get together and at least attempt to get real.

0 points
0
0
WoodyG's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:07 pm

I can hear MM now .......

"Aaron, if you ever commit a penalty like that again that possibly costs us a ballgame, you're going to be sitting next to me on the bench. If you commit two, you might just find yourself out of a job."

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:19 pm

And you need to understand the difference between "opinion" and "reporting". Hey, here's what Brian thinks! Woody's response?? "Get real" - well, how much more real can Brian get than TELLING YOU WHAT HE THINKS.

Christ, all you do is complain about our opinions Woody. And that's totally your right - but I'm just flummoxed why you keep returning to a site you clearly think is out to lunch when it comes to how it thinks about the Packers.

0 points
0
0
ILpackfan's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:34 pm

I agree if you don’t like what you read that's fine but no need to take personal attacks. We come here because its the best even if you don’t agree with some of the options of the guys who take time to tell us what they are thinking then say and move on its a open forum for discussion not personal attacks keep the gloves up

0 points
0
0
WoodyG's picture

September 29, 2010 at 10:16 pm

Telling someone to 'get real' is hardly a personal attack ..... Unless you live in a convent.

0 points
0
0
WoodyG's picture

September 29, 2010 at 10:08 pm

Your opinions (often times) are far fetched & far from fact-based ..... CHTV has the same tendency as many Packer blogs to exaggerate conditions & draw conclusions (as you see it) that only serve to muddy the waters .......

After every GB loss ....yes ....you guys are "out to lunch" ..... Instead of a rational view of the state of the Pack, all you guys have is 'opinion based on emotion'. ..... I can get that anywhere.

Actually, I've agreed with many opinions in the last year or so .... I'm guessing ANY disagreement with opinions presented on CHTV must be taboo.

0 points
0
0
Brian Carriveau's picture

September 29, 2010 at 10:11 pm

There's disagreement here all the time. Aaron generally disagrees with my opinion on this issue. I generally disagreed with his post on Woodson earlier today. We move on and even get along.

0 points
0
0
WoodyG's picture

September 29, 2010 at 10:31 pm

Tell that to Nagler ...... His inclusion of me in the earlier Woodson blog was out of line ..... Nothing I say merits mention in a published blog unless it is of a positive nature ..... Hey, just my opinion.

0 points
0
0
cole's picture

September 30, 2010 at 10:00 am

Not every penalty is black and white. Brian's post was just an example of what McCarthey should do or could say to a player for the undisciplined penalties. He is generalizing about the problem. We have been top 3 in penalties for three years in a row, obviously it's a coaching problem.

Just because you used it as a personal jab just try and find a crack in Brian's opinion doesn't mean anything. The fact is still that something needs to be done to make these players stop committing stupid penalties. You can't use A-rods grounding penalty as an example as it only happens a few times a year, whereas stupid penalties like PI, holding, and false starts happen every game.

Nothing is black and white. You can't say the same thing to every player for every different kind of penalty. The point Brian was getting at is that McCarthey needs to hold his players accountable. No one can disagree there as it's obvious they are not.

0 points
0
0
Asshalo's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:07 pm

I don't put much stock into what coaches say in rationalizing wins and losses as the stupidity/validity of what a coach says depends largely on whether the team wins or looses. I don't see the point in getting upset now because I don't know how the team is going to respond. Believe me, I am worried the team is going to take this lightly. After they beat themselves the way they did, they should be having a come to Jesus meeting.

The majority of the penalties were in fact penalties on the packers. My beef is that two touchdowns were taken away and the Bears were given the go ahead score. That's 11 points taken from Green Bay and 3 Given to Chicago.

Even though the referring was one-sided, they shouldn't have committed THAT MANY penalties. It's like the more important the game got, the more stupid the mistakes got. Sure they had rookies on the field and people get tired, but these are mistakes a veteran team should not be making.

0 points
0
0
Asshalo's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:09 pm

....What I am getting at is, they need to stop relying on talent and eliminate the majority of these mental lapses.

0 points
0
0
ReggieLivesOn's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:07 pm

I think MM is doing what he can behind closed doors. I would just really like to see if he has any other facial expressions. I want to see some emotion, just like every other Packers fan I'm sure..

0 points
0
0
dude's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:08 pm

McCarthy was right to not punish Zombo on that play. His reaction was spot on. I know you've got a blog to write but c'mon, man.

0 points
0
0
CSS's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:25 pm

Agree with the sentiment, the example is wrong. You would be better served criticizing Matthews for the sophmoric face mask penalty on cutler. Zombo-aggressive. Matthews-careless.

0 points
0
0
PackerAaron's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:27 pm

"Agree with the sentiment, the example is wrong." Perfectly stated.

0 points
0
0
PkrNboro's picture

September 30, 2010 at 09:01 am

...another example could be the offsides penalty on the kickoff. I find that sort of pre-snap penalty to be obscene.

I agree with the Matthews observation -- why is he trying to tackle the "head" instead of the "body" ?

As for the Zombo call, I wonder if QBs haven't started lowering their heads during sacks -- in order to get it in-line with the sacker and increase the possibility of getting a bogus head2head penalty call. IMO, he made contact but didn't "spear" him -- as the penalty was originally designed to prevent.

0 points
0
0
WoodyG's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:27 pm

All MM did was defend an undrafted FA that busted his tail to make a 53-man roster in the NFL .... And Carriveau wants MM to publicly demean the guy after his 1st start as a rookie ..... Ya..... That'll work ........

0 points
0
0
jones's picture

September 29, 2010 at 09:48 pm

I think you are way off focusing on the Zombo penalty here! MM takes the right approach i think with these "effort" penalties. It would make more sense to bench Aaron Rodgers for his stupid intentional grounding penalty than Zombo for his personal foul. (Not that I am advocating benching Rodgers) There were plenty of stupid fixable penalties that need to be focused on. Chewing out and threatening a young player for a strong play that earned an unlucky penalty is exactly the wrong focus.

0 points
0
0
lebowski's picture

September 29, 2010 at 11:07 pm

Bottom line, McCarthy needs to ask these guys, "Do you want to achieve something special this year? Do you want to earn a playoff check? Then pull your heads out of your asses, because penalty-ridden games like this will keep us home in January." Oh, and he can work 'pad level' in there somewhere too if he wants.

0 points
0
0
Black Hawk's picture

September 29, 2010 at 11:21 pm

Hey Nerdmann...you forgot Sherman's other buddy Bob Slowik

0 points
0
0
andrew's picture

September 29, 2010 at 11:54 pm

i disagree with this.. pass interference calls. u can come down hard on when its blatant... but roughing the passer gets called one day not called another.. zombo is a rookie.. those things will happen with a rookie..

as for veteran tackles going offsides and holding.. that is unexcusable.. but defensive penalties are not something you can really get mad about...

and i would be upset if MM got mad about that kinda stuff in public.. but in the locker room i would hope he was furious..

0 points
0
0
Cuphound's picture

September 30, 2010 at 12:27 am

Thank you, Brian. This post means a lot to me. It was one thing to lose to the Bears 26-0 in 2006. It's another thing entirely to lose this way now. This hurt worse than even the Tampa Bay game last year. It's awful and McCarthy has to actually be a head coach and learn to YELL.

It's inexplicable that Tom Crabtree could say that McCarthy wasn't angry after that game. I wish I could believe he was lying to be polite. I can't.

McCarthy needs to change or he needs to get the hell out.

0 points
0
0
Badknees's picture

September 30, 2010 at 12:47 am

Bulaga and Lang need to be on the field before postseason. Another game like Chicago is going to ruin the reputation of two great Packer players. They just don't have legs to be starters anymore.

I think it's great that the coaches have the players playing with reckless abandon. It's a lot better than a players being conservative ("assignment sure" Hawk). The Pack will settle down and have a good year.

0 points
0
0
Jack's picture

September 30, 2010 at 12:48 am

I am a McCarthy and Thompson backer but I am beginning to think that this duo is limited. TT will never become a risk-taker (and go after high-profile free agents); and MM is not likely to change his ways, either (his tolerance of penalties, poor clock management,
dumb challenges etc..)
If the Packers fall short this year and don't make it far in the playoffs, Mark Murphy will have an unenviable decision to make. Let's hope he has the good judgement--not to mention cojones--to choose the right path for the organization.

0 points
0
0
Pauline's picture

September 30, 2010 at 01:04 am

I think and have always thought that maybe they should penalize these players with fines. It may just help to minimize especially the flagrant fouls if they have to reach into their pockets.. Just my opinion..

0 points
0
0
Nononsense's picture

September 30, 2010 at 01:57 am

I hate stupid penalties and repeat offenders.

I can forgive penalties like Morgan Burnetts pass interference or lack thereof, Matthews face mask and Zombo's crushing blow but they need to learn from them and not make the same mistake twice.

I really don't know what else Burnett could do to avoid his penalty. I thought he was in great position and even turned his head to locate the ball. The ball was underthrown, that should be like a tipped ball, it should have never been called, Collins made a great play and the refs cheated him out of it.

Still I feel your frustration, if it was one game fine, but this has gone on for too long now. I thought he had a handle on it this season, until Monday night.

Time will tell if that game was just a fluke or an ongoing problem.

0 points
0
0
Nononsense's picture

September 30, 2010 at 02:08 am

Anyway you slice it, the Bears and their fans are downright lucky to be 3-0. For those that watched their games, anybody that says any different is either blind or in denial.

The Bears ARE who we thought they were...if you want to crown em, then crown their ass.

0 points
0
0
DAWG's picture

September 30, 2010 at 06:25 am

The great John Mckay--Reporter asks- Coach, what did you think of your teams execution today---Coach Mckay--I'm all for it.
Bring them dam kitty's on, and de-claw them son-of-a bi*&%^es

0 points
0
0
BigbyATTACK's picture

September 30, 2010 at 07:20 am

Wow, there's a lot to swallow on this topic. Funny, isn't it, the things being vented on in here? The undefeated teams are Pittsburgh, Chicago, and Kansas City. Not names I've heard or considered myself in Super Bowl chatter. Everyone else has lost this year, already. I thought there was a lot of sloppiness in all three games, but the team is looking so talented and good, that despite the mistakes, the offensive line troubles, the penalties, etc., they've pulled through, and almost had this game won DESPITE the 18 penalties. If James Jones switches the ball over, we're upset, but praising how they overcame the sloppiness to pull out the win. We're good. We're really, really good. And there's a lot of season left against some pretty strong clubs. Thing is, I think they're all worried about us. And they should be. We'll be fine. The boys'll pull it together. We won't be perfect, we won't go 15-1. But we will make every team this season play us for the full 60 minutes, and if they're the better team that day, they'll have to have earned it. dundun, du dun dun dun...GO PACK, GO!

0 points
0
0
Ruppert's picture

September 30, 2010 at 07:38 am

Look, I'm not saying McCarthy should be fired. But after seeing a couple chronic problems rise up and cost us a game, I think it is fair to question if McCarthy is capable of finally correcting these things before they rise up again at an inopportune time (read: Playoff game) and shoot down the entire season. It's a question, not a call for someone's head. And it is a fair question.

0 points
0
0