How Have the Packers Fared as Large Underdogs Under Rodgers and McCarthy?

A look at previous large underdog appearances for Aaron Rodgers' Packers.

Much has been made this week about how the Packers opened the week against the undefeated powerhouse that is the Los Angeles Rams as 8.5-point underdogs. The line has since moved to 9.5. This is, as you have almost certainly heard by now, the largest underdog the Packers have been with Aaron Rodgers at quarterback.

I was interested in looking back at other touchdown-plus lines the Packers have faced, but was surprised to find that only two other times under Rodgers have the Packers been underdogs of seven or more points, those being on the road at Seattle in the 2014 season NFC Championship (eight point underdogs) and on the road at Arizona in the 2015 season divisional playoffs (7 points). Aside from those two games, the other most lopsided point spreads the Packers have faced under Rodgers were at the New York Jets in the 2010 regular season (six points) and at the Atlanta Falcons in the 2016 season NFC Championship (5.5).

The Packers only won one of these games, that being the game against the Jets, which was a 9-3 snoozer, but an important victory in the Packers' regular season that year. The other three playoff games were all defeats.

Of these four other games, only one matchup really resembles the situation the Packers are walking into in Los Angeles, that being the matchup against the historically potent offense of the Atlanta Falcons in January 2017.

Like those Falcons, this is a Rams offense loaded with playmakers at every level, so many that it almost becomes impossible to scheme against them. The Falcons had the league MVP on offense in Matt Ryan, and the Rams have a bona fide MVP candidate in Todd Gurley in the backfield. The Falcons had a young, on-the-rise hotshot coordinator calling plays in Kyle Shanahan, and the Rams have a young, on-the-rise hotshot head coach developing unique schemes and calling excellent games in Sean McVay.

You don't need me to remind you what happened in that game in Atlanta, but I will anyway. The Falcons blew out the Packers 44-21 in a game that was nowhere near as close as the score indicates.

The other three games on the list of large underdog appearances for Aaron Rodgers all featured the Packers playing against elite defenses that had proven themselves capable of completely shutting down some of the league's best passers. And in all three of those games, Rodgers and the Packers' offense found it difficult to get any momentum going. The two losses (in Seattle and Arizona) were, famously, both in overtime.

This is, of course, a different year and a different Packer team. But in the four biggest underdog games of Aaron Rodgers' career, he and the Packers have not put on particularly impressive performances.

The Rams are obviously a tough matchup for the Packers' defense, but the Packers' offense is going to have its hands full. This is a defense that has the best defender in the league in Aaron Donald, who is a nightmare for opposing lines and quarterbacks. They also have a deep, talented secondary that complements the Donald-led front seven quite well.

The Packers are nearly 10-point underdogs for a reason; they have had an underwhelming start of the season at best, and have inspired no confidence that their defense will be able to even slow down this Rams juggernaut, let alone stop it. It's hard to find places on the field in which the Packers will have a clear advantage.

That all being said, they play the games for a reason. While the Packers' relatively dismal history as big underdogs under Rodgers and McCarthy provides some historical context for the game, it has no bearing on how the team will perform this weekend. 

Even taking all those other underdog games into consideration, this feels like maybe the first time under Rodgers that the Packers are heading into a game that they really have no business winning. Sounds like the perfect scenario in which to catch the red-hot Rams by surprise.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Tim Backes is a lifelong Packer fan and a contributor to CheeseheadTV. Follow him on Twitter @timbackes for his Packer takes, random musings and Untappd beer check-ins.

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (16)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Bearmeat's picture

October 25, 2018 at 09:45 pm

Yeah, I mean, a surprise is about the only thing we have going for us. The Rams are better at literally every position on the field except QB, LT and WR1. Maybe TE and C too. But that's not much.

I've seen MM teams wake up midseason too many times to discount that possibility. But if GB doesn't get hot and start scoring 35 a game the next 5 weeks, we're going to be looking at 4-6-1 or so going into December...

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

October 26, 2018 at 08:24 am

"I've seen MM teams wake up midseason too many times"

To me that's the problem. MM never has his team ready to start the season. It's happened again. In my opinion, unless therr is some miracle SB berth, there should not be zero chance for MM to start off slow in 2019.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

October 25, 2018 at 10:24 pm

It's being called the game of the week. What spread? This game is about being men. Not puberty. A-Rod must show he can bring it, and finish what he starts. His performance must be aggressive and right on the money. This team has big play ability. It's no longer about improvement. A-Rod is able, and can Stick it in. Show me, show me, show me. Make it fun to watch again.

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

October 26, 2018 at 04:17 am

The outcome will depend on if the refs give the Packers a chance to win.

0 points
0
0
PAPackerbacker's picture

October 26, 2018 at 06:52 am

And what was the point spread for the Bills and Vikings game? I would like nothing more than the Packers to give the Rams their first loss of the season. Probably not going to happen but who really cares about point spreads? My guess is the Redskins and Lions didn't care about point spreads. You have to play the game!! And never, ever, take a team lightly. Go! Pack! Go!

0 points
0
0
PatrickGB's picture

October 26, 2018 at 07:14 am

I don’t see see this team stopping Gurley. And I don’t see this team stopping a few big plays in the secondary. However, that does not mean that we cannot pull off a win. Just score more points. I think that this team can do that.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

October 26, 2018 at 07:46 am

Tall order this game. We have 5 Dlinemen on the roster - two named Tyler Lancaster and Montravious Adams. With Gurley running at them and chasing all the side to side formations we could easily get run out of town by the 4th quarter.

If we could get pressure on Goff, we would have a chance. That would mean a big game by our LBs. Stranger things have happened.

0 points
0
0
jeremyjjbrown's picture

October 26, 2018 at 08:27 am

I expect Gurley's going to attack the Packers edges mostly. Not that that bodes better for GB.

0 points
0
0
Lare's picture

October 26, 2018 at 09:10 am

The Rams will attack the weakest positions, and those are the OLB's and the safeties.

0 points
0
0
DD's picture

October 26, 2018 at 11:41 am

Pettines time to shine! Our defense is still slow and lost, with the inability to play tight and communicate. We have good athletes, just lack the white matter and will.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

October 26, 2018 at 02:56 pm

My first thought is that they'll attack the edges, but I fully expect them to hit just about everywhere. I would expect the Rams to come out and play their game, challenging the Packers to stop them. I think we see more run blitzes on early downs from the Packers this week than we've seen for awhile, trying to force 2nd or 3rd and longs and keep the Rams OL from generating any kind of momentum.

Pettine has to know that he has to punch the Rams in the mouth and try to stun them long enough for the offense to win this game. They have to be attacking the LOS in this one and trusting that the CBs can disrupt and then run with the Rams' WRs...which is a tall order because Woods and Cooks are both fast but neither is big or strong.

0 points
0
0
DD's picture

October 26, 2018 at 11:39 am

Note. When underdogs what is the common thread? MM has not, and will not have them ready at all. It will be a blowout based on what I've seen to date. Chance? Yes. Probably of winning? 5%. MM is our problem. I'm done with fans accepting his same lame excuses with no change.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

October 26, 2018 at 12:33 pm

Hopefully this means that you will no longer post here and return to your Vikings blog. Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

October 26, 2018 at 06:34 pm

I had no idea fans had the power to hire and fire. Now I feel negligent.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

October 26, 2018 at 07:45 pm

We need some sort of refresher course on fan rights. First we drop the ball by not having MM and Philbin personally double-team Aaron Donald, and now this? Could someone put together a PowerPoint? I'm so lost.

0 points
0
0
DD's picture

October 26, 2018 at 11:48 am

Our offense will struggle as the Ram defense has watched our first six games and will know our patterns before the ball is snapped. Rams, as they see it, must stop our run the first quarer, then go after Rodgers for the next 3 quarters. Our defense has not shown the ability to stop any good QB ti date, so don't expect our defense to even slow Girlee or stop the creative McVay offense and Golf-ball playaction.. Golf -ball will outshine Rodgers in this one. Rams too fast for us.

0 points
0
0