Defensive Tackle WIll Be The Big Prize Of The Offseason
The winds of change begin to blow around the league today, but the Packers have already sent a major signal.
By Kalani Jones

It’s March 9th, and that means that the “legal” tempering period has finally arrived. By the time you are reading this, it may have already begun (news will start flying at 12pm EST).
Writing a “prediction” article for the Packers free agency would probably be a fool’s errand. The last time I attempted this, I was proven wrong less than 24 hours later. The utter quagmire of moving parts, shifting tides and real-time disinformation that dominates this particular stretch of the NFL schedule. Green Bay moves to the sound of its own drum. Always has, and always will. Just when you think they’ve got them pinned down, they’ll go and do something like trade for a Micah Parsons, drop an exorbitant amount of money on Aaron Banks / Nate Hobbs, and draft a wide receiver in the first round, all in the same offseason.
What we do know is that the Packers are in the middle of a championship window (despite Gutekunst’s belief that championship windows don’t actually exist. They do.). In order to make the best use of that championship window, the Packers need to find difference makers. They need to find players who change the math, who can put Green Bay over the top. Over the weekend, the Packers have put themselves in a position to focus in on one of the biggest holes on their roster.
First, let’s establish the Packers’ needs over the offseason. Among “major” needs, we can undeniably start with cornerback, defensive tackle, and center. Then, I’d argue that the “mid” tier should consist of linebacker (although there could be an argument for that being a higher need), running back, tight end, edge rusher, and a backup quarterback. Between myself and everyone else on the excellent staff of writers here at CHTV, we’ve gone over every single one of these needs. Some stem from a lack of bodies at the position, some stem from a lack of quality play already at the position, and some are in anticipation of future versions of the Packers.
Now, the Packers made a couple of moves that shake this order up quite a bit. On Saturday morning, it was announced that Green Bay had completed a rare player-for-player swap, sending DT Colby Wooden to the Indianapolis Colts in exchange for LB Zaire Franklin. Then on Sunday, the team re-signed outgoing G/C Sean Rhyan to a three year deal worth $11 million a year and restructured the contract of Aaron Banks, ensuring his presence on the roster through 2026.
There’s things I like and things I don’t like here. Firstly, the commitment to Aaron Banks is a mixed bag. There’s no way to tiptoe around the fact that his first season in Green Bay was a disappointment. Banks was oft-injured, clearly hampered by those injuries when he was on the field, and did not come close to living up to his contract.
When Banks did seem to be shaking off those injuries towards the end of the season, he played much better (he was probably the best linemen on the team during the wildcard game). For the Packers to commit to keeping Banks through the season, they are banking (pardon the pun) on him playing healthy in 2026, and leaning into keeping some continuity along the offensive line. Time will tell if that strategy will pay off.
Keeping Sean Rhyan at center makes sense to me for a couple of reasons. First, we have to take a look at the supply and demand around the league. There are a lot of teams around the league that are in the market, as of now, and only one true high end solution available in free agency, now that Connor McGovern is returning to Buffalo. Tyler Linderbaum is almost certainly going to command a price tag that will be outside of the Packer’s range, which means Green Bay would be picking from a tier of players at center that includes Sean Rhyan. So it just makes the most sense to keep the player that you already know from that tier. Give Rhyan an entire offseason at center (please for the love of god, no more cross training), see what he can do. I’d also love to see the Packers supplement this signing with a rookie selection from this deep center class, but we also have to remember that there are a lot of teams looking to do the same thing. Heading into 2026 with Sean Rhyan and Jacob Monk is a distinct possibility.
This means that the 2026 starting offensive line is probably already set. It will be (barring an extremely surprising move) Morgan-Banks-Rhyan-Belton-Tom, with a smattering of backups competing behind them, hopefully with a rookie or two mixed in.
Meanwhile, acquiring Zaire Franklin for Colby Wooden has some far-reaching implications. The most obvious assertion to make is that Quay Walker will indeed be a member of a different team in 2026. This was the most likely outcome all along, since the Packers chose not to exercise his fifth-year option last offseason. Quay was never able to fully realize his potential as a linebacker, nor live up to his billing as a first round pick. Hopefully he lands in the AFC (Raiders or Jaguars would be my guess), in which case we wish him luck.
Zaire is an ideal pickup to fill his spot, despite coming off of the worst season of his career. With a cap hit of only $8.2 million this year, he’s cheaper than the Packers were going to find on the open market for a starting LB capable of running the defense. Franklin is a team captain, a second team All-Pro and a pro bowler. He’s also a former Walter Payton Man Of The Year nominee. Culturally speaking, he’s a perfect fit for what the Packers want in their players.
His inclusion on the 2026 roster means that Edgerrin Cooper will most likely not need to learn how to communicate plays via the green dot, nor will that responsibility pass onto Isiah McDuffie, who would have had to be on the field for almost every play. I do wonder how this affects who the Packers would have on the field for sets that include only a single linebacker, like dime. Taking Edgerrin Cooper off the field for Franklin would be a disappointment, and part of me still wonders whether or not Xavier McKInney could take those responsibilities over. Still, keeping McDuffie in a backup role and not forcing Ty’Ron Hopper onto the field is ideal. I do wonder how this affects Hopper’s future, going into the third year of his NFL career. Does he have a chance to compete with Franklin for that spot? If not, he might be doomed to be an NFL backup forever.
Let’s be clear however, that Franklin is not a perfect player, nor is he the “missing piece” of a Packers championship. He’ll be thirty when the season kicks off in August, and is coming off the worst season of his career. He may have been limited by an ankle procedure he underwent before the 2025 season, or perhaps he was never able to get 100% ingrained within Lou Anarumo’s defense. Whatever the case, it’s clear that the 2025 version of Franklin was not the same as the All-Pro we saw in 2024. Sure, it’s possible that he can recapture his magic. But history is against him.
The other side of this trade is the loss of Colby Wooden. For a positional group that was among the weakest on the team last year, trading away a player who saw over 600 snaps last season is pretty bold. Not only that, but out of the nine players on the Packers roster last season, Wooden had by far the most snaps at nose tackle (153 compared to the next closest player, Nazir Stackhouse with 39). Wooden also played the most snaps as a 3-tech defensive tackle on the team (368, compared to Karl Brooks’ 299. Wyatt was at 253 when he got hurt, but was on pace for 369). Wooden was also not due for the rookie pay escalator clause, meaning he would have cost only $1.3 million against the cap. It’s possible that the Colts simply would not have done the trade without Wooden, but the fact is that now after losing Wooden, Kenny Clark and TJ Slaton within a calendar year, Green Bay is sorely missing in bodies along the defensive line. Why would the Packers be willing to part with such an integral piece of their DL rotation? Methinks there is another move or two on the way…
It makes sense that the Packers believe they still have work to do along the line. Without Wooden, the team goes from needing more DTs because of a talent issue, to needing more because they just don’t have enough bodies at the position and there’s a talent issue. Karl Brooks, Jordan Riley and Devonte Wyatt are all set to hit free agency after 2026, which would leave only Nazir Stackhouse and Warren Brinson on the roster. The team also goes from just needing a nose tackle type, to also now needing a 3-tech as well (remember all those snaps that Wooden played, that we now will need to fill). Green Bay should be looking to at minimum, double dip along the defensive line.
The good news is that with these recent moves, the Packers can afford to focus on that issue. With Sean Rhyan back, the Packers don't need to over commit to finding their 2026 starter. With Zaire Franklin in hand, the Packers don’t need to panic about finding another linebacker to pair with Edge Cooper (which I think was a bigger issue within the Packers’ organization than we may have originally thought). If we go by our tier system again, then both center and linebacker have dropped in urgency due to this weekend’s moves. The Packers are wise not to back themselves into a corner regarding any position, and can instead address them as the opportunity arises.
As far as filling these urgent positional needs that remain, the Packers have options. Something to keep an eye on over the next few days is players that have been released by their former team, rather than those whose contracts have expired. Signing the former pool of candidates would not cost the Packers any of the comp picks that will be on their way in 2027. To that end, we also have a couple of DTs who were just released by the Arizona Cardinals, thus having a connection to new Packers DC Johnathan Gannon: Bilal Nichols and Dalvin Tomlinson. Tomlinson is particularly intriguing as a NT option for the Packers, albeit being on the wrong side of thirty.
Of course, if the Packers did want to go big game hunting over the next few days, they can. Remember that the maximum number of comp picks that can be awarded to a team is four, and the Packers have five free agents that could net the Packers a pick. So, the Packers could choose to sign one big free agent this offseason, and still get four comp picks next year. Also as a reminder, trades do not affect comp picks in any way either.
Between spending that one big swing at cornerback or defensive tackle, I think the Packers just gave us a major hint at which direction they’ll be going in. By clearing Colby Wooden off their books for 2026, there is a lot of room for a new face along the defensive line. The Packers can, and should, double down on the Micah Parsons investment with a DT signing. I think the lack of juice along the defensive line became more and more obvious as the 2025 season wore on, culminating in the loss to the Ravens at home. You can’t win a Super Bowl that way, and I think the Packers have something up their sleeve to turn the tables. What it might be? I can’t say for sure, but I think there are big things on the horizon. Perhaps in more ways than one.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns!
__________________________




Comments (31)
Savage57
March 09, 2026 at 06:58 am
The Packers have a history of sustained position group holes. I don't know if other teams do, but it seems the Howie Roseman's of the league find ways to address them early, not ignore or enlarge them.
Without the coin to be FA players, will the Packers draft players at DT and CB who won't see the field for two years during this 'championship window'?
jlc1
March 09, 2026 at 08:28 am
It seems logical that teams that regularly find good enough players to fill holes are coaching them up to be good enough. Every year brings more evidence that MLF and whatever crew of coaches he has on hand are not as good at this as some other teams.
Cheezehead72
March 09, 2026 at 07:21 am
I just do not get it. We trade a young run stuffing DL that can play two positions that is on his rookie contract for an aging LB that cannot cover and questionable speed that cost more and we have to restructure contracts to get him. The problem we had with Walker is that he could not cover well. Last season teams ran on us because we could not stop the run. Guess what Gute just opened up the gate and the castle is unprotected.
Someone please tell me how to apply for the Packers GM position.
As for Rhyan I am glad that they signed him. Yes it is like buying a car they paid him more than I wanted them to but the way the market is going we kept an important piece.
Is it just me or do others not concern themselves with comp picks. I would prefer the Packers get the best players for the lowest cost and let the comp picks fall where they do. I hope Gute is not looking too much at the comp picks during free agency.
dobber
March 09, 2026 at 07:40 am
"We trade a young run stuffing DL that can play two positions that is on his rookie contract for an aging LB that cannot cover and questionable speed that cost more and we have to restructure contracts to get him"
They might have traded one-for-one, but they aren't lineup replacements...and they were going to have to restructure plenty of contracts, anyway. Wooden might have been one of their better DL against the run in '25, but let's not make him out to be Vita Vea.
"Guess what Gute just opened up the gate and the castle is unprotected."
Bottom line is that Wooden didn't have a place in the defense Gannon wants to run and, nearing the end of his rookie deal, they leveraged him to fill a different hole. Chances are, they saved enough money on Franklin to sign a FA who can figure into the DL rotation. Gannon wants bigger, more stout DL (based on his history and what sportswriters are reporting). That's good for Brinson who brings more size, but you have to wonder what Brooks' role will be going forward.
People piss on Franklin, but there's just as much if not more value in knowing where you need to be and being there as there is in being really fast but all over the place. Defenses start by having guys where they're supposed to be. I'll point out that people had little faith in Walker's coverage skills, either.
We're about to hit the two biggest player acquisition periods (FA and the draft), and the Packers are only just moving to position themselves. People are responding as if we just hit the final cutdown in August. This is a 4-6 month process...allow it to mature.
"Is it just me or do others not concern themselves with comp picks."
At this point, who knows what Gute will do when the fur starts flying? None of the acquisitions before the start of the league year figure into comp picks.
Cheezehead72
March 09, 2026 at 07:58 am
I agree with you that I want a player that knows where to be instead of running all over the place. The problem is we also need a player that knows where to be and can get there.
What happened during the last Chicago game. Loveland a rookie ripped apart our defense because we did not have LBs that could cover. If Franklin was better in coverage I would agree to this trade but he is not.
Yes its just the start of FA but if you have a good start there is less work later.
dobber
March 09, 2026 at 08:10 am
I'm going to disagree on Loveland. That wasn't just on the LB. The Packers weren't manning up, they were playing mostly zone and they didn't adjust to fill the holes the Bears were exploiting by stretching the safeties deeper--especially in the 10-15 yard sideline stuff.
Coldworld
March 09, 2026 at 10:27 am
Wooden was absolutely not a run stuffing DT. In fact he was the one most often heading backwards. That’s not entirely his fault, at his size he was asked to do the impossible over an extended period. As a back up rotational piece perhaps, but he managed no penetrative threat either, as he hadn’t as a DE previously. He is Brooks but without the redeeming ability to get into the back field. He was not a starting caliber DT in a 4:3 and definitely not in a 3:4 and not a starting DE in that scheme either. He just didn’t fit. Better for him and us that we accepted that and moved on from the fantasy of last year.
Guam
March 09, 2026 at 07:41 am
I often agree with your posts CH72, but not this one. I have long viewed Wooden as a liability. The Packer run defense nose dived last season and Wooden was a big part of that slide. Wooden is going into his fourth season in the league and is unlikely to get better. Brinson and Stackhouse have a chance to be better and there is still free agency and the draft to acquire more DTs. And Gute got an ILB to replace Q. Walker and the guy is pretty similar to Walker in traits and performance and much cheaper than Walker is going to be.
As a fan I concern myself with comp picks and I am certain Gute values them more than I do. Protecting those comp picks is smart business. Having four comp picks next year will be a big offset to no #1 pick.
I was shocked at the price tag for Rhyan but the Packers need a center. Rhyan was likely their best option.
dobber
March 09, 2026 at 07:48 am
...and we're not talking about 6th and 7th round comps. These are potentially 3rd and 4th rounders, and there's a huge amount of value there. I have little doubt that if there's a great fit at a good price and position of need, Gute will go get it--but other things being even and given the option, I think he'll sign the player that protects those picks.
Guam
March 09, 2026 at 07:55 am
There are a couple of veteran nose tackles (Gannon's former NT, Tomlinson as an example) that could be signed without offsetting a comp pick and I expect Gute to get one of them shortly. I don't think there are that many good college NTs that could just step in and help immediately.
Cheezehead72
March 09, 2026 at 07:51 am
Brinson and Stackhouse were on the team last year. The team that had a weakness stopping the run. The team that needed better defensive lineman so why trade a young player on his rookie contract that has played and played well.
I really hope Stackhouse and Brinson become better players but I do not see either one being the same player as Wooden this season.
Once again its not that we traded him its what we got in return and what we are paying the player.
Guam
March 09, 2026 at 08:04 am
Brinson and Stackhouse were rookies last year and normally the biggest jump a player takes is between year 1 and year 2. I expect one or both of them to be better than Wooden. We clearly have different views on how Wooden played last season.
Additionally, Gannon seems to prefer to play a 3-4 and you need a nose tackle to do that. Wooden isn't a NT. I expect Gute to sign a true NT sometime in free agency.
Your point about the new ILB is fair. He played very well in 2024 and not well under a new DC and new defensive scheme in 2025. Gannon has coached this guy before so likely believes he will be a good fit for his defense in 2026. Time will tell.
dobber
March 09, 2026 at 08:25 am
"Brinson and Stackhouse were rookies last year and normally the biggest jump a player takes is between year 1 and year 2. "
Trench players often make steps forward in that first off-season in an NFL weight/nutrition program and a chance to focus on their roles.
Dave Hanner
March 09, 2026 at 12:11 pm
Quay Walker did not play up to expectations. Wooden was just okay. The trade solves the LB problem quite effectively. They can and will do much better with new faces on the DL. Keep watching
T7Steve
March 09, 2026 at 07:27 am
"(which I think was a bigger issue within the Packers’ organization than we may have originally thought)"
If only I could hear "The Rest of the Story", going back to my Paul Harvey days.
Starrbrite
March 09, 2026 at 02:33 pm
Paul Harvey—love it!
Guam
March 09, 2026 at 07:50 am
Is anyone else floored at the price tag for Rhyan? Many pundits had him in the $6-7 MM AAV range and that seemed reasonable. The Packers signed him for $11 MM AAV. I suspect 2026 is lower than the AAV, but that is a steep price tag for Rhyan. Maybe the Packers felt there was no other viable option between free agency and the draft. I hope he lives up to the contract.
Cheezehead72
March 09, 2026 at 08:05 am
Floored no disappointed yes. You have to look at the contracts that centers are signing. His contract technically is only 11 mil as that is all that is gaurenteed. I look at the average each year but I put more weight on the guarenteed money because that is what the team has to pay and counts towards the cap when released.
Guam
March 09, 2026 at 08:15 am
The Packers needed a center. They couldn't go into 2026 with Jacob Monk. I guess you pay what you have to, to get the job done.
dobber
March 09, 2026 at 08:05 am
I think it tells you that there are several buyers out there who don't have a viable C and that the draft class is viewed as pretty weak. Players and agents can see this, too.
Pete Dougherty wrote this morning that the market for C reset: Biadasz got $10M AAV, and McGovern got about $13M AAV (and that's before Rhyan signed). Biadasz rates fairly well (11 of 40) but McGovern was 20 of 40 according to PFF (if you buy that stuff... ;) ) and got $32M guaranteed!!! That makes the $11M guaranted for Rhyan look pretty good. He expects Rhyan's '26 cap hit to be in the $6-7M range.
Guam
March 09, 2026 at 08:13 am
Clearly the market changed. It is interesting that it changed so quickly that it caught most of the pundits off guard much less the fans. $6-7MM in 2026 makes sense for the Packers.
Boothie8739
March 09, 2026 at 11:27 am
Supply and Demand... Look at the NFC North. Other than the Packers who needs a Center?
Answer: Virtually Everyone. That's why Sean got paid.
Curt
March 09, 2026 at 07:51 am
Decision made was that Wooden - the guy that played the most snaps on a less than average line - was needed less than a linebacker that can tackle. Franklin is a surer tackling run defender closer to the line than Walker with the same weaknesses in pass coverage. Cooper will be the guy in dime coverages, Franklin and Cooper in the nickel to start, with a hope that Hopper can take some of those snaps as the year winds on. Cornerback remains my biggest concern.
dobber
March 09, 2026 at 08:01 am
You have to ask how many snaps Wooden plays if Wyatt--and then later, Jordon Riley--stays healthy.
'Course they probably don't deal for Riley if Wyatt stays healthy.
"Cornerback remains my biggest concern."
I think they'll look for a low-money CB in FA and then draft two...that room needs to turn over badly.
NFLfan
March 09, 2026 at 07:57 am
Edgerrin Cooper is the only LB who inspires confidence-
dobber
March 09, 2026 at 07:57 am
" It’s possible that the Colts simply would not have done the trade without Wooden"
Well, given that's the only thing they got in return, I suspect you're right.
"By clearing Colby Wooden off their books for 2026, there is a lot of room for a new face along the defensive line."
That's a pretty sunshiney take on a position group that struggled mightily both before and after Wyatt got hurt and until they brought in Jordon Riley...and even then they weren't very good (and Riley got hurt, too). Riley isn't expected to play in '26.
They get Wyatt back. He's not a run-stuffer and needs to play next to a beefy guy or be used more situationally. They don't have the beefy guy, yet. It's not Brinson--he's really more of a bigger 3T or 5T. Stackhouse still needs to mature...maybe he starts to fill that role. I think the Packers look for that tree stump clogger in FA--as Vic Ketchman would say, NTs are grown. They have a tough decision to make on Wyatt's future in GB.
NFLfan
March 09, 2026 at 08:00 am
Rhyan is the least of my worries. Morgan, Banks and Butkus are troubling.
BuckyBadger
March 09, 2026 at 08:24 am
"In order to make the best use of that championship window, the Packers need to find difference makers."
I know this sort of stuff sells but how many "difference makers" can a team sign to their roster and stay under the cap? I would love to bring in a difference maker at every position but that isn't realistic. With the trade for Parson's, having Love under contract and Kraft needing a new deal don't expect to get many more of these difference makers in free agency. Those players don't sign for cheap in free agency, you usually end up over paying for them. I would expect more role players or guys who where buried on the depth chart.
NFLfan
March 09, 2026 at 08:26 am
I remember McGovern from the Jets and he was very average. If he's being paid 13 M, Rhyan is worth 11M. Someone would have likely paid him more in FA. Those are the going rates----little supply, big demand drives up the price.
TKWorldWide
March 09, 2026 at 09:29 am
Is Aaron Banks more than one player?
mjbrogno
March 09, 2026 at 10:41 am
Being on the field really doesn’t matter if the production is not there. Wooden did not produce, it’s simple. Q. Walker has talent but lacks the mental part of the game. Ryhan was put in a tough position after Jenkins went down. He played better at center as the season went on. And yes, stop the cross training O lineman.