Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - So now what?

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

January disappointment again - So now what? Give it the old college try one more time with the older Senior student crawling towards graduation (to retirement or 2nd Super Bowl success). Or call on the eager Junior looking to accelerate his studies and maybe graduate early? Unfortunately, it's the 39 year old student still hoping to graduate that gets to make that decision. The train has left the station on trading Rodgers, and even if they were to cut him after June 1st, it still adds 43.4M to the salary cap and another 24.5 million next year. Rodgers negotiated the contract as such so the Packers could not easily bail on him after one year. He wanted to control the decision on whether he plays in 2023 or not. And he has that power.

Draft football players - It's time for another evolution in the way the Packers build their roster. This season saw them specifically give more credence to special teams ability among the players they brought in, whether it was through the draft or FA signings. The next evolution should be to draft "football players" with very good athletic traits over elite athletes that haven't shown as much success on the field. This would be especially true on defense and the offensive line. Physicality and football toughness is sorely lacking on the Packers' defense - they scare no one. The offensive line has been manhandled by in-your-face defenses, letting some statistically average defenses have their best games of the season (see Lions, Detroit). So please Gutey, find more of those guys that live and breathe for the chance to step on a football field, and not just to look good in uniform and collect the paychecks.

Very funny Gutey - Or is it? When Gutey was asked about keeping Aaron Jones, which is what they intend to do, he said, "The way we’re doing things lately, we’ll probably restructure everybody to make some room." As I've written here before, I was ready to start the Jordan Love era after last offseason, come hell or high water and whatever the results would be. Now it appears they are ready to "run it back" one more time and tighten the salary cap noose around their neck for years to come. As I said last offseason, if it gets them a Super Bowl, then it would be worth it. But with the reality of this season hitting hard, it sure seems like a fool's gambit, but one they may not have a choice but to make.

Bisaccia - Molto bene! Well done, Rich. Someone finally did what was needed on special teams. He fashioned cohesive units and established a culture of pride in performance among the players on those units. Gutey helped by bringing in some players that had that experience, but still, someone had to make it all work. The coverage units (kickoffs and punts) were the best we've seen in Green Bay for many years. The return game (once the powers that be finally gave up on Amari Rodgers) flourished as Bisaccia struck gold with Keisean Nixon, a player with minimal return experience for the Raiders. What a find! The only negatives were a couple of blips with a blocked punt and field goal, but Rome wasn't built in a day.

Need a vet WR - I'm really intrigued by what is going to happen with the Packers' WR room next season. Lazard has already told us he's gone, and if Cobb exits as well (which kind of makes sense, right?) where will the veteran voice and leadership in that room come from? You'd have to think the Packers HAVE to bring someone in, and we're not talking Sammy Watkins here. Stay tuned...

Jerry Gray - Looks like he will be interviewing for the Atlanta DC position. I'm kind of torn on Jerry Gray. On the one hand, the defensive backs, almost to a man, under-performed or regressed this season. However, from his interview demeanor, where he would refer any scheme-related questions to Joe Barry, I got the impression he wasn't on board with how things were being done. Then there was the yelling incident, where he let his group have it at halftime of the Dolphins game and by the players' admissions, woke them up. Why did he wait that long to react?

Mason Crosby - Is this the end of the road in Green Bay after 258 straight games over 16 years? His distance numbers declined mightily this year, with only 1 field goal of 50+ yards in four attempts and a horrendous touchback percentage of 20.3% (only two kickers were worse). Leg strength is not going to get any better for a 39-year old kicker and with Crosby needing a new contract after making appx. $5M in 2022, it's time to make the kind of cold-hearted business decision they had to make with Jordy Nelson. 

Walker / Williams - How insane is it that Jamal Williams was fined more by the NFL for a hip swaying TD celebration than Quay Walker for pushing a Lions medical team member? Note, they were both "second offenses." Which one offends you more? Whoever is in charge of making these anti-celebration rules for the NFL should be sacked and quickly escorted out of the building.

Coaches grow on trees - I've been thinking lately about the Shanahan coaching tree, which is now responsible for 25% of the head coaches in the NFL, and where Matt LaFleur will rank on that list. Using playoff success and my own personal opinion as the criteria, here is how I rank them as of right now. Obviously, a lot more needs to be seen of the last four on the list to see where they rank over time, but here is my guess on where they rank right now.

Shanahan/McVay Coaching Tree (since 2016)

  • Kyle Shanahan – San Francisco 49ers head coach, former Atlanta Falcons offensive coordinator
    • 7-3 postseason record
    • 2 Super Bowl appearances
    • 3 Conference Championship game appearances
  • Sean McVay – Los Angeles Rams head coach
    • 7-3 postseason record
    • 1 Super Bowl Championship
    • 2 Super Bowl appearances
    • 2 Conference Championship game appearances
  • Zac Taylor – Cincinnati Bengals head coach
    • 4-1 postseason record
    • 1 Super Bowl appearance
    • 1 Conference Championship game appearance
  • Matt LaFleur – Green Bay Packers head coach
    • 2-4 postseason record
    • 2 Conference Championship game appearances
  • Mike McDaniel – Miami Dolphins head coach
    • 0-1 postseason record
       
  • Kevin O’Connell – Minnesota Vikings head coach
    • 0-1 postseason record
       
  • Brandon Staley – Los Angeles Chargers head coach
    • 0-1 postseason record
       
  • Robert Saleh – New York Jets head coach
    • No postseason appearances

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
9 points
 

Comments (151)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Lphill's picture

January 18, 2023 at 06:28 am

is TY Hilton worth kicking the tires? who knows , I agree on Crosby ,the leg strength is not there, can Douglas replace Amos ?

3 points
4
1
fair_weather's picture

January 18, 2023 at 06:30 am

Who is responsible for giving the franchise reins to Rodgers?

10 points
11
1
NickPerry's picture

January 18, 2023 at 06:44 am

Mark "We're not Idiots" Murphy!!!!!

11 points
11
0
fair_weather's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:42 am

This is madness. There seems to be no consideration about the future of this team.

6 points
7
1
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:49 am

In MM's world, the future of the team ends when he retires and enters the Packers' Hall of Fame. The 2026 season can take of itself.

3 points
4
1
wildbill's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:22 am

So MM rides Rodgers into the sunset and retires when Rodgers does. That leaves his successor with cap hell and Kizer 2.0 at QB so as we struggle through a 70/80s flashback and he just looks like the cats meow with his Super Bowl ring and a fat bank account.
A fart in the wind…..

-1 points
3
4
mnbadger's picture

January 18, 2023 at 12:47 pm

Mark Murphy's position is the only one that approves taht contract. Russ B and Brian G negotiated, very poorly IMO, but it doesn't happen if MM says it doesn't happen.
One other point, I disagree with the respected author:
"Rodgers negotiated the contract as such so . . . "
Rodgers didn't negotiate the contract. By definition, contracts need defined parties of authority on both sides.
ar12's team shot for the moon and hit it dead on. The GBPkrs team didn't negotiate at all. See above.
I do have a solution, which is actually pretty simple. If I'm correct, there is no "NO TRADE" clause in the contract.
Trade him to the worst team for him to succeed. Say the NYJets.
Offer to pay half the money in each remaining year. Get yourself a couple of decent players and maybe a 2nd round draft pick.
ar12's only out is to retire. At that point, I don't think we owe him anything?
Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.
If he takes the trade, your out from 1/2 the salary, all of the drama, all of the me first leadership and all of the problems stemming from what the coaches want to do and what the diva wants to do.
I couldn't be more done with him and I know I'm not alone.
I was his biggest fan until he totally turned into me first and only me version.
GPG!

2 points
2
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 19, 2023 at 02:48 am

"Offer to pay half the money in each remaining year."

The above is not possible. Also, while the Packers can't release AR, they can take the route you suggest and trade him whether he likes it or not. Such a trade would only be to a bad team if the front office decided to rip the band aid off; that is, release him by trading him to another team. A trade to Houston (not a great example since I doubt they want AR, but still) would have to be for conditional picks, which might be something like a conditional 7th in 2025 if AR refuses to report, with better compensation if AR reports, more and better picks if AR plays a lot of snaps, more if the acquiring team makes the playoffs, stuff like that.

If they can find a trade partner with the following characteristics: 1) wants AR; 2) Is willing to write a $59M check or satisfy AR with some new contract; 3) is a team AR wants to play for; 4) is willing to send some draft compensation to GB.

I think you should scale back what you think AR might garner in a trade.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

January 18, 2023 at 06:41 am

"Rodgers negotiated the contract as such so the Packers could not easily bail on him after one year. He wanted to control the decision on whether he plays in 2023 or not. And he has that power."

That sentence right there is enough to keep a Packers obsessed fan like myself awake at night. After watching Rodgers this year all I can think of for 2023 is MORE handoffs to Dillon from shotgun, MORE 40 yard deeps balls on 3rd and 1, MORE totally ignoring the middle of the field, and MORE stats exactly like Rodgers 2022 stats. If fans are still thinking Rodgers gives the Packers the BEST chance to win, then they weren't watching in 2022...Thing is, you DIDN'T even have to watch very closely to see that. Father time is undefeated and it caught up to Rodgers in a single year. Well that and KNOWING he holds ALL cards, and can really do whatever in the hell HE wants to do.

Funny Gutey... I will go to my grave believing Gutey has had little choice. He started drafting for the future 3 years ago and since he's just had to go with the flow and TRY to draft with one on the future and one eye on the upcoming season. IMO Gute would have NEVER resigned Rodgers and he probably cries himself to sleep thinking what COULD HAVE BEEN had they traded Rodgers.

Just think, the Packers COULD have had three #1 and three #2 round picks in just LAST years draft had they traded Rodgers and Adams. PLUS another 1st and 2nd this year. PLUS, a D-Linemen and a TE who IMO could have thrived in this offense. Way to go Mark Murphy...Ducking Putz!!!

After a season like the one Rodgers just had IMO he NEEDS to show up for Mini Camps and TC. For $60 million dollars he OWES the Packers organization and fans that. I understand some will disagree with that and say he doesn't have to do anything the bargaining agreement says he does. Guys like Brady and Wilson have always done the extra things not in the agreement to make themselves and teammates better. I can think of 60 million reasons why Rodgers SHOULD do the same. Anything less and it tells me he's just here for the $$$.

27 points
32
5
BradHTX's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:32 am

“I will go to my grave believing Gutey has had little choice… and he probably cries himself to sleep thinking what COULD HAVE BEEN had they traded Rodgers.”

I agree, NP. And I actually feel the same way about MaLF, to be honest. He has his warts as a coach, but I’m still not certain we’ve ever seen his offense as he actually wants it to be run. I believe he and Gute made the Jordan Love decision together, I don’t think it was soley Gute’s decision to start preparing for the post-Rodgers future.

There may be some verrrry interesting interviews that come out once Rodgers, LaFleur and Gutekunst are all ex-Packers. We may learn that many things we assumed were the case were very different than we thought.

10 points
12
2
NickPerry's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:32 am

I agree, 100% about MLF Brad... I think there's a WHOLE lot of offense we haven't seen because Rodgers just won't do it.

0 points
3
3
LambeauPlain's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:36 am

If you believe this about MLF, then you are admitting he is a very weak leader and mostly just a "yes" man.

5 points
6
1
BradHTX's picture

January 18, 2023 at 12:16 pm

I don’t know that he isn’t; but he’s in a bit of a no-win situation (not unlike his record in the NFCCG - *rimshot*). He was made head coach of the Packers when Rodgers appeared to be in decline. He and Gute started to make plans for the post-Rodgers era, drafting Love, who they intended to mold into the QB to run MaLF’s offense.

Rodgers responded with his patented Shoulder Chip Motivation, and turned it around with two MVP seasons. And we all seem to believe the decision to bring Rodgers back and extend him was likely Murphy’s, not Gute’s or MaLF’s. Thus, what is MaLF supposed to do? He’s the new guy in town, Rodgers is the beloved future HOF superstar QB with a Super Bowl ring, two prior MVP awards, and 15+ seasons’ experience. You think even if MaLF has cojones the size grapefruits, he’s going to try to play a Lombardi hard ass style of coaching and force Rodgers to not be Rodgers any more?

Trying to do that wouldn’t be an example of being a strong leader, it would be career suicide. He’s been doing the diplomatic thing: trying to make the best of a bad situation he was forced into, doing his best to modify his scheme to fit Rodgers’ talents and tendencies, and never throwing the Beloved Vet under the bus for doing whatever he wants to. Waiting it out, and hoping Rodgers moves on before he gets fired, and that Gute/Ball can figure out a way to field a competitive team under the financial restraints of a contract they didn’t ask to have on the books. That isn’t being a “yes man,” it’s just playing out a bad hand and hoping the next one is better.

Of course, there’s a lot of conjecture here, but hey, it’s a blog comment board, what do you expect?

4 points
5
1
Tundraboy's picture

January 18, 2023 at 04:28 pm

Excellent points. I suppose this is what you get when you don't have a owner or at least a president that reigns everyone in. It's like you wish there was someone strong enough to sit them all down and say it's not working this way. Grow up and Make it work. Losing sucks

0 points
1
1
Rebecca's picture

January 20, 2023 at 12:35 pm

I agree 101%! It’s all conjecture. Very entertaining.

0 points
0
0
fthisJack's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:23 pm

I say take the cap hit and trade Rodgers. I can't see him walking away from football when there's a chance with another organization to win a SB. Also say goodbye to Reed, Lowery, Amos, Tonyan, Rodgers man crush, Lazard and Crosby. There's a market for Bahk so take another cap hit and let the rebuild begin!
Please get rid of Barry before the players start eating hotdogs on the sidelines.

1 points
1
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

January 19, 2023 at 02:54 am

I agree. I'd accept a single first round pick plus a future third for AR.

1 points
2
1
Ferrari-Driver's picture

January 19, 2023 at 09:04 pm

Please, not another third.

1 points
1
0
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:40 am

" I can think of 60 million reasons why Rodgers SHOULD do the same. Anything less and it tells me he's just here for the $$$."

This has been true throughout history: Give a man god-like powers and he'll act like a god.

It's just human nature.

4 points
5
1
fair_weather's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:43 am

Don’t forget about those plays where he throws to a receiver who is behind the line of scrimmage. Love those plays!

5 points
6
1
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:50 am

I loved that play at the end of the Vikings game :) But then, I hate the Vikings.

1 points
1
0
Cubbygold's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:59 am

100%. Gute hasn't been perfect but he got screwed by an organization that couldn't pick a plan and stick with it. More than anything else, that's been the downfall of this team, not going all in and not rebuilding. Football purgatory

3 points
6.5
3.5
Cubbygold's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:02 am

Actually I hope gute exacts some revenge in this off-season by drafting young prospects that need several years to develop. Gary-esq. Rodgers and MM may have screwed this team but gute can still build for 2026 in his decisions today

3 points
6
3
T7Steve's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:25 am

If he had those kinds of balls he would have quit when MM hamstringed him and started going behind his back. What GM worth his salt would take that??? I guess his next move would be to work for Jerry Jones.

0 points
2
2
mrtundra's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:22 am

I was on the "Let the Love era begin" bandwagon, back in training camp, just prior to the big deal Rodgers got. I'm still on the "let the Love era begin" bandwagon. Now, we know we are going to get skewered in any cap discussions, from here on out, at least, for a few years. I also find the same fans who want Rodgers to return, next season, cannot see that we will get more of the same, from what he gave us last season. I see no improvement coming at all and if, if we were to make the post season, we would not get far, again. Has anyone noticed that our record, this year, is the same as the vikings record last year? And the vikings record, this year, was the same as our record last year? IMO, the vikings are a mediocre team, as we are quickly becoming. I also see that those fans wanting Rodgers to return may be some of the same fans who wanted Favre back, after his retirement antics. They are blind to the future and just want to hold on to something recognizable, even if it means we are mediocre. It's time to move on from Rodgers, let Love be our QB and sign some cheap rookie draftees and grow from there.

6 points
6
0
dobber's picture

January 18, 2023 at 09:12 am

If this team runs it back in terms of veteran personnel, it means the only way they get better is through health across the board and the young guys becoming world beaters.

I would argue that the defense becoming a bullying, top-5 unit--the kind of defense we were hoping for in June--would make a difference, too. I don't know how you accomplish that by running back the same schematic approach.

6 points
6
0
Coldworld's picture

January 19, 2023 at 09:20 am

The mindset in Lambeau appears to be that there is no reason to change. If that were the plan, Barry would have been gone in November and we’d have had a search in full swing now.

We don’t have a will to change but a dream that running it back will be different somehow. It could be characterized as we just need to be better at doing what we do. In Itself, that’s a tell for a culture exclusively looking inwards and igniting their competition. That’s essentially the three wise monkeys approach to management. The results are inevitable.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 19, 2023 at 12:33 pm

The myth of Sisyphus.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:31 am

"Rodgers negotiated the contract as such so the Packers could not easily bail on him after one year. He wanted to control the decision on whether he plays in 2023 or not. And he has that power."

Packers can trade ACR if they are prepared to swallow ~40 mill $. Peter Bukowski explained how in his podcast "locked on packers" 5 days ago. I suggest to go and listen explanation of ACR contract and why it cost them that low when taking in consideration his 150 mill $ guaranteed.

0 points
1
1
marpag1's picture

January 18, 2023 at 12:16 pm

When did it become cool to call Rodgers "ACR?" Who does that? As if it were some sort of vicious burn or something... LOL

1 points
4
3
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

January 19, 2023 at 10:14 am

Because theyre his initials?

0 points
1
1
croatpackfan's picture

January 19, 2023 at 01:13 pm

Aaron Choker, pardon, Charles Rodgers...

-1 points
0
1
egbertsouse's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:16 am

Did you hear the Diva on McTankTop’s show? It was the usual me,me,me crap he usually spouts along with a list of demands for Murphy. No rebuild. Sign my posse. I need more time off for self-actualization.

If these demands are met he promised to win another MVP. That’s right. Not a championship or Super Bowl, but another frigging MVP. Diva views the Packers as a life-support system to get himself more individual awards.

22 points
25
3
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:41 am

"Diva views the Packers as a life-support system to get himself more individual awards."

As he has for the last five years, at least. There's no I in team, but there is one in DIVA.

8 points
10
2
Minniman's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:56 pm

I can sum it all up with an appropriately placed update to a song line and a movie quote:

"Diva, Las Vegas."

"He's not the messiah, he's just a very naughty boy!"

That's what I think anyway.

0 points
2
2
Cubbygold's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:00 am

I loved his comment "guys like Randall Cobb you can win with". He's delusional

8 points
10
2
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:04 am

He actually said that? I mean, we finished 8-9, so not a winning season. OMFG, we are so screwed.

4 points
5
1
croatpackfan's picture

January 20, 2023 at 01:28 am

But, but, but he was "injured"!

-1 points
0
1
PeteK's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:23 am

He also said certain players have to be resigned. How can we do that with him eating up all the cap.

2 points
4
2
Oppy's picture

January 19, 2023 at 07:02 am

It's logical to assume everyone is happy to bend over to play with the Messiah.

0 points
2
2
NickPerry's picture

January 19, 2023 at 05:31 am

I heard that too...Almost choked on my morning coffee.

BUT, didn't he also say he doesn't have a "No-Trade" clause in his contract or least didn't think so. Once Carr's contract is off the books I believe the Raiders would have about $50 million in cap space and that's without doing any salary cap gymnastics like GB has done the last few seasons.

FIND a trade partner and trade him. The time for getting a HAUL for Rodgers was last year. GB fucked that up. They can still get something but would they do it?

1 points
3
2
Coldworld's picture

January 19, 2023 at 09:27 am

Rodgers is just playing his cards. He’s laying out what the team needs to do to keep him. The first rule of any negotiation is to know when to walk away. I believe the contract he secured last year was really about Rodgers proving that Murphy had no such trigger and thus Rodgers had absolute control of the relationship.

We essentially agreed to become a vassal to our QB for as long as that pleases him. Is there any reason to believe that there is newfound resistance within the organization? So far it seems like the mandate from Murphy is coordinated obeisance and tribute. The abject prostration of a kingdom in thrall.

1 points
2
1
PatrickGB's picture

January 19, 2023 at 10:36 am

If you ask ME a question about ME, I will give you an answer about ME. It’s called an interview. Inter-view.

1 points
2
1
greengold's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:25 am

Good stuff, Al.

January disappointment for the 2022 season was expected. Sadly. Aaron Rodgers’ statement yesterday saying he thinks he can “win another MVP in the right situation,” tells us all we need to know. Reaffirmation.

We all saw it coming, and it’s time to buckle our seatbelts and return our chairs to an upright position. Turbulence ahead.

Packers would be best served … um, uh… oh… Never mind.

I haven’t been this disappointed in the overall direction of this Packers team since Tom Braatz.

That’s incomprehensible, and points to a dereliction of duty.

Hello, Packers Board of Directors? It’s not too late for you to act. Now. Do it.

14 points
14
0
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:43 am

I've already been preparing for 2024's January disappointment. Watching this offseason unfold is like watching a major car crash in slow motion.

7 points
7
0
greengold's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:48 am

jurp! That is so perfectly stated. I feel exactly the same. Our eyes got bigger as we went off the road 3 years ago… heading for the reality of mismanagement tree.

5 points
5
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

January 19, 2023 at 10:17 am

And yet we cant look away. Ugh.

1 points
1
0
fair_weather's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:44 am

Dereliction of duty= Mark Murphy

7 points
7
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:33 am

I'm not getting this idea that it's all Rodgers decision. Rodgers gets to decide what he wants to do, but the Packers organization get to decide what they want to do. If they have a common agenda, great. If not, then the adults in the room have to make decisions.

I think the offensive engine needs an overhaul. New QB and a draft full of offensive players. I'm not in favor of bringing back the same veterans who haven't gotten it done.

15 points
16
1
Razer's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:39 am

Yes - thank you. This is my hope as well but I am not getting a strong sense that Gutekunst is willing to take the steps. Totally agree on the offensive overhaul as well. I don't see the pieces on this squad to scare anyone. And for the love of God - let's get a real tight end.

2 points
3
1
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:44 am

The steps are not Gutekunst's to take - they all belong to Murphy, who now appears to be a Walmart version of Jerry Jones and Al Davis.

8 points
9
1
BradHTX's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:17 am

Good one, Jurp.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

January 19, 2023 at 09:39 am

Tea leaves from Tuesday's McAffee spot and Schefty's analysis of those comments points to the overhaul actually happening.

If NYJ trades for him, the Packers could once again find themselves in a very good position. I think the NY market would be well received by AR, and the team already has a very stout D. Seems to be symbiotic for both AR and the Packers.

Getting out from that contract would be a breath of fresh air, and that trade could provide a better haul than many might think.

There was a lot of careful talk going on during the McAffee spot. Schefter saying odds favor him playing with any other team than the Packers carries with it the possibility of a deal being imminent.

I know I'm ready, as are many here, to begin the changeover in earnest, ASAP.

That's my positive thought for this day, and no, my name is not Jack Handy.

1 points
1
0
BirdDogUni's picture

January 19, 2023 at 10:03 am

I too felt AR12 was almost encouraging the Packers to trade him on the PMS.

Part of me wishes things were different and AR12 could retire a Packer with a SB win, but that isn't likely, so the next best outcome for the Packers would to be trade him for whatever we can get and let Love have his shot at greatness.

No doubt there will be growing pains his first year or so, but it's time to find out if he's the future one way or the other.

2 points
3
1
jannes bjornson's picture

January 19, 2023 at 12:55 pm

This PR session could be part of the package from the original deal. Take a chance in 2022, if all goes well, fine. If not, create a story which allows for the Tragic hero to move on. More than likely, the result will be stasis.

2 points
2
0
Razer's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:34 am

After listening to Gutekunst speak last Friday I was left wondering who runs anything in this organization. He should be the White House press secretary. I get keeping your cards close to your chest but hearing our GM talk about giving our QB time to evaluate his future and go through his process gave me a bad feeling. What about what the Packers want?! Here is what I think is going on:

-Gutekunst and Murphy haven't seen the potential in Love
-Gutekunst made this pick and his job rides is on the line
-Murphy needs people frolicking on his slide and in his park
-Packers need winning seasons to keep people interested
-Rodgers keeps these two guys employed

The Lions GM had the balls and vision to trade Stafford and start the rebuild. They will control the division for the foreseeable future. The Packers are still shoveling coal into our steam locomotive hoping that time doesn't catch up. Sad

7 points
10
3
Untylu1968's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:53 am

In the end, Rodgers may just be the reason they get shit canned..

8 points
8
0
Razer's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:28 am

Absolutely. The thing that really bewilders me is that the front office thinks that this roster is built to win it all. When the reality of this grand illusion plays out, there will be no place to hide. The careless and long-term handicapping of future team health by holding on too long will result in a total house clean. And, rightfully so!

7 points
7
0
13TimeChamps's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:07 am

"The Lions GM had the balls and vision to trade Stafford and start the rebuild."

Ditto for Seattle as well. Both had the vision to move on from their franchise QB's at the right moment for the health and future of their respective teams. Now both teams have multiple 1st round picks and a healthy salary cap. And their futures look bright.

GB decided that wasn't the route to take. As a result, we're in salary cap hell for at least 2 more years with a soon to be 40yo QB who is showing signs of decline and, apparently, is more interested in competing for MVP's than Super Bowls.

That is management malfeasance to the nth degree.

11 points
11
0
PeteK's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:36 am

Add Raiders to that list, even though Carr made it easy for them with an extremely team favorable out.

2 points
2
0
stockholder's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:39 am

Point, counter point.
If the packers could move on from Rodgers. They Would.
(And it didn't stop them from moving on from Favre.)
If Love showed he was better. Even Sooner.
Rodgers would be Gone. But he didn't!
So now we have madness. Blame the FO.
This team lacks, just about everything but QB.
The OL needs/needed fixing.
The WRS left, leaving a bigger fix.
The RBs fumbled at key times, in the Red Zone.
The DL was rated Terrible for years.
The LBs regressed and a rookie started.
The CBs were up and down.
And the safeties were pathetic and a non factor.
A kicker who is judged on leg strength. Then success.
Love is No competitor. He hasn't proved anything yet.
So why is he the cure for Team?
Rodgers has made monkeys out of management.
You can't win without him. And the FO knows it.

-8 points
5
13
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:48 am

"Rodgers has made monkeys out of management."

Finally, a point we can agree on, although Murphy was a willing monkey. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if MM has the onset of CTE.

"You can't win without him. And the FO knows it."

As this season has proven, you can't win WITH Rodgers. 8-9 is NOT a winning record, and we got lucky in at least three of those victories.

11 points
11
0
stockholder's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:00 am

If this team was ready sooner. They could have won!
The lions game Showed all the little things.

-4 points
3
7
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:05 am

Delusional

6 points
7
1
croatpackfan's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:36 am

jurp, please do not be so harsh on disabled persons. I realy worries what will happen with stockholder once ACR will ride in the sunset. He might perform suicide. He is so attached of idealistic picture of ACR, that he lives under constant hard stress these days.

4 points
7
3
stockholder's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:27 am

No - I listed the things everyone has written about.
And the concerns in this upcoming draft.
I get you can't let ACR run the Team.
Management acknowledged that he should have a say.
Make Love not War. Doesn't work!!!

-4 points
2
6
PeteK's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:47 am

I have to agree with some of your pts. After they signed AR, I started to believe that the confidence in Love was not there, remember they see him in practice all the time. However, I still would have rolled with the rebuild instead of handing out a ridiculous contract with no out.

4 points
4
0
fthisJack's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:39 pm

The out is too trade Mr. Rodgers and let the rebuild begin!

1 points
3
2
jannes bjornson's picture

January 18, 2023 at 09:05 am

PFN One trade rule. Player trades unknown.
#15 to Seattle for #20/52
#20 Joey Porter,Jr. P State CB
#45 Sean Tucker Syracuse RB
#52 Tucker Kraft SDState TE
#78 Keeanu Benton Badgers DT
#113 Isaiah McGuire Missouri Edge
#146 Mark Perry TCU SS
#210 Incoom C Mich Edge
#210 Silvera Az State DT
#220 Max Duggan TCU QB

2 points
3
1
Leatherhead's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:06 am

JB, I'm not picking on you with this, but it illustrates what I've said countless times.

I like taking a stud defender with our first pick. I like the RB and the TE,

But at the same time, the offensive line looks like an afterthought on Day 3. Why? If we bring back everyone we can, we could have Bakhtiari, Runyan, Jenkins, Tom, Nijman. That's a pretty good starting group, IMO, but as soon as anybody gets hurt, we're putting Myers, then Newman, then Hanson on the field. IMO, building up the second unit on the offensive line should be more of a priority than some Day 3 long shot. I'm hoping that Rhyan or Walker or Jones has improved, but I wouldn't let the season depend on it.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXEDIT

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 18, 2023 at 12:09 pm

LH, this mock is assuming Bhak stays at LT and get a FA OT to compete for RT. Porter,Jr adds the other guy to shut down the New passing games, shifting Douglas to safety. I would trade A. Jones and let Tonyan walk. Amos is a guy who hit the wall. My preferred choices would be Broderick Jones rd one if Porter or Gonzalez are taken and Bergeron OT , in the second to man the RT spot, or Schmitz to take the center or RG spot. I still like these guys next to Bhak. Not Impressed with the existing crew as they get whipped by aggressive D-lines. I think he panicked on the Jenkins extension. He should come back better? Rhyan and Walker should beat out Newman and Hanson who cannot get the job done.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

January 18, 2023 at 12:35 pm

Even though I was disappointed in Myers's play this season, remember he was injured the majority of last season. It takes some time for linemen to develop especially centers. That backup crew could be serviceable for a game or two, but please no Newman at RT.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:54 pm

The entire right flank was being worked over from the beginning. Myers knees may have been compromised?

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:10 am

Why do you think we need a Cb. - I'm for Drafting Turner out of Mi. - later
I Really think Turner could play safety. And be great at FS.
A better choice at TE is Zack Knutz. Old Dominion. Played at Penn State.
Frame and Blocking of Lewis. Freak list!
Later picks also-
I want them to draft a FB. Hunter Luepke. FB ND State.
My center is Oluwatimi, Michigan.
I'm also starting to like the WR from Ohio state.
Duggan works. In fact I'd use the 7th rd. to take two QBs.

-2 points
0
2
jannes bjornson's picture

January 18, 2023 at 12:19 pm

You take the best guys at the spot and Stokes is a PUP case and at best a #3 CB. Tyson Campbell should have been taken instead. Joey Porter,jr is a solid CB and has the size to front up the taller WRs. You cannot have Douglas 1:1 with Waddle etc. Kuntz is 6'-8" post up guy rd six. Maybe they keep Big Dog for a role. Kraft and Kincaid resemble Kittle. Two TEs are needed. Luepke is a RB in the mold of Mike Alstott. Deguara is fine as a lead blocker, they never use the formations. He is not the problem. LaFleur is the issue. Smith from OSU is a guy you have to be cautious when evaluating because of his injuries. He doesn't have the quicks like Olave and Wilson. Henderson is the MSU safety. Turner is 180 lbs and they have Savage coming back with the gifted 5th year option. They have to score points to win. There is no hope with this clown Barry. Benton takes Lowry's spot and they can go 4-2/4-3 looks. McGuire was ALL SEC and adds another pass rusher. Gary probably a PUP guy. I would resign Reed.

0 points
0
0
fthisJack's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:44 pm

Remember they have Walker and Jones on the OL. If history is an indicator those guys have a chance to develop at RT.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 18, 2023 at 06:04 pm

Walker was my #7 in the mocks. He should get his body back in shape or move to RG and compete with Runyan. We cannot have guys being pushed backwards into the QB on bull rushes.

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

January 19, 2023 at 10:18 am

Could you imagine if Walker were to come in and dominate at RG, Caleb Jones came in and started destroying guys at RT, we kicked Runyan back over to LG and we moved Jenkins to C?

Bakh, Runyan, Jenkins, Walker, Jones would be a huge line... With Tom, Nijman, and Meyers as backups, I would feel pretty damn good about our OL if in fact Walker and Jones were to be able to dominate on the right side of our line.

Granted, Walker and Jones would have to be dominate for this to be a viable option though. If we had Campy back as OL coach I could actually see this happening.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 19, 2023 at 12:48 pm

I would still get an OT in round one, or two to start at RT. I am not a big fan of projecting UDFAs to spots they probably would not succeed. Tom has the footwork, but not the upper body to challenge the bullrush. We saw Hendrickson destroy Nijman and Tom needed help all day. How will Rhyan look in Camp? I wonder if Jenkins has the same range he had in college? Maybe Tom gets a shot at the center position.

-1 points
0
1
T7Steve's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:37 am

"Hey, Hey, we're the Monkeys! People say we monkey around!"

4 points
4
0
stockholder's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:33 am

Thats better than a Beatle song. - Love is all you need.
Which brings us - Revolution. - It's going to be all right with ACR!

0 points
4
4
BirdDogUni's picture

January 19, 2023 at 10:36 am

Especially after we trade him for picks.

2 points
2
0
Vachio's picture

January 18, 2023 at 04:06 pm

This is the same organization that kept trotting out Amari Rodgers week after week as a returner, that chose Newman as one of their starters to open the season, that kept Dean Lowry on the field until he was injured, that kept Darnell Savage in a starting role far too long, and kept playing Sammy Watkins. And that's just off the top of my head from this season. I'm sure it would be worse if I dug into it a bit and looked back at past seasons.

Jordan Love could be Joe Montana, Peyton Manning, and Dan Marino all rolled into one and this staff would never see it.

3 points
3
0
jvole's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:42 am

Rodgers will not retire. Get rid of his older buddies and hint at starting Love. He will want a trade to prove how great he is. Trade him after the June deadline.

How I see it/hope it turns out.

11 points
13
2
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:53 am

Not a bad strategy, if Murphy were so inclined. Sadly, I don't think he wants Rodgers to be traded or retire, however, so the shitshow will go on the road for yet another season.

5 points
5
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:16 am

So you think Murphy wants his legacy to be that he was that he left the team unprepared for the future at the most important position? That's his goal?

I'm dubious. Obviously, he'd love to win a Super Bowl before he's retired, but other than that, I can't believe he doesn't want to leave a solid situation for the next guy.

0 points
0
0
Cubbygold's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:53 am

Or maybe he is less ambitious than that and just wants to avoid a Jerry Krause legacy. Very little career risk letting 12 stay while half the stadium wears his jersey.

2 points
2
0
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 02:52 pm

I think Murphy wants his legacy to be the Title Town development and the millions it generates. At this point, the team is a secondary consideration so long as the sucke... er, us fans continue to go to the games, buy merchandise, and make our pilgrimages to Lambeau. After all, history shows that the fans did not punish the team for the mostly brutal years from 1973-1990, so another stretch of losing matters not to the boys in the comfy offices.

2 points
2
0
HarryHodag's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:59 am

I didn't really care much if the Packers made the playoffs or not. I figured it would be 50-50 if they played the Vikings in Minnesota(probably more like 30-70), but I knew they would be torn apart by the 49'ers in California.
Kyle Shanahan owns Matt LaFleur.

I hope the Packers front office is aware that fans will likely not tolerate another 'all in' season that results in another season of expensive aging veterans coming up short. Quite honestly I could support a roster changeover that features new players giving it their all and probably not winning as much, like the Lions.

Sorry but one way to change the Aaron Rodgers dynamic is to cut or not sign all of his buddies. Not bringing back Aaron Jones would hurt, but David B., Cobb, M. Lewis, and Mason Crosby should not be on the roster next year. That likely would prompt Rodgers to 'retire'(like Favre) and usher in the new era.

9 points
10
1
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:07 am

I highly doubt that Gutekunst wants to re-sign any of those guys, as they don't make any kind of football or financial sense.

I expect Ball to re-work a ton of contracts to re-sign them, on orders from above.

4 points
4
0
Razer's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:35 am

You are right and it would probably be the way things are done. Like Rodgers a little passive aggressive is "the way". I would keep Bakhtiari to help Love. Top left tackles are gold and, if he is beyond his knee surgery, then protect the blindside.

4 points
5
1
greengold's picture

January 19, 2023 at 08:51 am

Yachtzee, Harry!
Yours is one of my favorite comments here, and you’re right. Ditching all of his buddies would without question made trading Aaron Rodgers a reality.

Maybe the news of such plans have already been relayed to him, hence his comments Tuesday, and Adam Schefter’s analysis that odds favor him playing for another team in 2023, instead of playing with the Packers.

Please, let it be so.

While many think he’s untradeable… there’s always that one team owner or coach who thinks they can reap benefits, and pull the trigger.

I hope it happens so we can start over minus the cap hell, even if paying a portion of his remaining contract is part of the deal.

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:06 am

Very good article Al. As always.

Searching the web I found this interesting podcast or show:
https://youtu.be/BZaxDm2oN0E

I call al Packers fan to invest 2 and more than half of hour to listen to the Hofeman bros. They analysed almosr every importan play of Lions at Packers 18th week game.

Maybe, just maybe that will be wake up call for many apologist of MLF, Joe Barry & ACR. Very good analyse with showing what is going on at Packers team.

It is my comment to your nice work Al, which I posted here as positive assessment of that work.

Enjoy Packers fans!

5 points
6
1
Coldworld's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:22 am

That the team even appears to be considering such a direction just illustrates the failings that led to the terms of his extension in the first place. There is no point in bringing him back if it required us to bring back this aging group that haven’t made a difference.

This team isn’t good enough now. This team has to get younger, better and gain not lose future cap flexibility. We laugh at the manner of the Vikings return to reality, but weren’t any better. This recipe would ensure that it stays that way. As such, any pandering too it will just prove the bankruptcy of the Murphy tenure one more time.

It also shows that Rodgers is either not primarily driven by winning or a horrible evaluator of the needs of the team and current abilities of his friends at least. No, you can’t win with Cobb, Cobb was largely a waste of s body statistically last year. He keeps playmakers off the field now more than he helps. It’s over. Time to drive the stake through this heart of this undead fantasy.

There are no excuses for the leadership this year. The lessons from the last season are too starkly defined. Continuation will cost careers.

9 points
9
0
T7Steve's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:47 am

I think the room needed Cobb as a player/coach. I think they should hire someone to be the coach. Him even, if he retires.

4 points
4
0
T7Steve's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:47 am

Don't know how I replied to myself. I'll have to do some interreflection on my trip to South America this offseason.

7 points
7
0
BirdDogUni's picture

January 19, 2023 at 10:54 am

Post a link to our itinerary...

1 points
1
0
RCPackerFan's picture

January 18, 2023 at 08:44 am

January disappointment again -
Rodgers has more power but isn't that what all players want? For some reason people just hate it more that its Rodgers that has the power.

Draft football players -
Whatever GB did last year, they need to duplicate it. Walker, Wyatt, Watson, Doubs, Tom, Enagbare all contributed. And not only contributed, they all played really well. This was possibly the Packers best draft class in a really long time. They need to do this again.

Very funny Gutey - Or is it?
3 years of very good football, one down year, in which the offense had 2 rookies playing key roles, the OL in shambles for half the year. Why wouldn't we want to try and go for it again? Why should we want to blow it all up?

Bisaccia -
Its amazing what a difference an explosive return man can make for a unit. It seems like when Nixon started flashing the special teams flipped a switch. Teams all around was playing much better.

Need a vet WR -
I agree that they will likely be looking for a veteran WR. But hopefully its someone that will contribute more then Watkins did.

Jerry Gray -
"Why did he wait that long to react?" Great question. I wonder if he felt like he didn't have a voice. And the Dolphins game he finally had it. That amount of times he would refer to Barry about questions, to me makes it feel like he didn't get to have a lot of say in what was going on. This is just the feeling I get from the situation.

Mason Crosby -
From what I have heard this was Crosby's last year. I just appreciate everything that he has done for the team. Outside of the one year he had a bad year, he has been clutch since he has been here.

Coaches grow on trees -
This is pretty fair evaluation. The interesting one on the list is Zac Taylor. He was close to being cut and now because of Burrow he is looked at differently.

4 points
5
1
T7Steve's picture

January 18, 2023 at 09:01 am

Al!! How can Matt L. be 2-4 in the postseason? Are you counting the week 18 Lions' game? I know math isn't my strong suit, but he went to the playoffs his first three years. Can't you only lose once a year? LOL.

I've said it before, I'll say it again. If the Packers don't get away from the finesse/cute/trick play culture and start to get tough, it won't matter who the QB is. If the opposing D dictates what you're going to do, they win.

Look at the successful playoff teams just this year. If you don't start by building from your O and D lines (TEs and edge included) you're going in the wrong direction.

7 points
7
0
SinceLombardi's picture

January 18, 2023 at 09:27 am

I still say Aaron Rodgers carried MLF for three seasons ( with Davante) As soon as Rodgers cooled, MLF fell apart. His lines are soft, his players are undisciplined. His W-L record is trending in the wrong direction. His once sterling NFC North record is in decline.
Picking Bisaccia was a no brainer.. I’m not giving too much credit for that. Too bad it wasn’t a no brainer to grab Martindale or Fangio.
I remember the false hope in the 80s after a few 8-8 seasons. If there is hope now I don’t know what it’s based on.
The salary cap gamble is looking like a big mistake because I have my doubts about the abilities of Doubs and whoever else will be out there. Watson has ability but still has questionable hands and is fragile to be kind.
Crosby has to go. Period for all the reasons you mentioned.
Quay Walker made me embarrassed to be a Packer fan several times this year. I don’t know what kind of defense will be on the field in 23 but I doubt it will dominate any lines of scrimmage.
Rodgers may very well end up somewhere that he can prove he can still win with a good cast and staff. Maybe the NYJ who play hard on every down but needed a QB1.
This is one of the first times I had the feeling things aren’t getting better in a while. I think a wildcard is easily attainable in the NFC next year but I honestly think that this team will have to be lucky to get it.
The little winning streak this year was suspect and overrated. Tua’s concussion kept the Packers alive until week 18.
I don’t know why the board of directors don’t start over from scratch. It’s the perfect time. Get a confident smart GM and a coaching staff that pushes the envelope on mental and physical toughness. The final game in each of the last three seasons is a microcosm of everything they do wrong in terms of toughness and keeping the wrong people employed too long. ( Drayton, Kevin King) They even brought Kevin King back the following season after the Tampa debacle.
The culture needs to change.
We are starting to become that franchise that other teams mark as a W on their schedule.

8 points
9
1
jannes bjornson's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:20 pm

Outstanding assessment.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:01 am

So Now What? The beat goes on.

The Green Bay Packers Board of Directors is the organization that serves as the owner of record for the Green Bay Packers of the National Football League (NFL).

The corporation is governed by a seven-member executive committee, elected from among the board of directors. The committee directs corporate management, approves major capital expenditures, establishes board policy, and monitors performance of management in conducting the business and affairs of the corporation.
The elected president, currently Mark H. Murphy, represents the corporation at NFL owners meetings and other league functions. The president is the only officer who receives compensation. The balance of the committee sits gratis.

Shareholder rights
Even though it is referred to as "common stock" in corporate offering documents, a share of Packers stock does not share the same rights traditionally associated with common or preferred stock. It does not include an equity interest, does not pay dividends, cannot be traded, and has no protection under securities law. It also confers no season-ticket purchasing privileges. Shareholders receive nothing more than voting rights, an invitation to the corporation's annual meeting, and an opportunity to purchase exclusive shareholder-only merchandise.
Shares cannot be resold, except back to the team for a fraction of the original price. While new shares can be given as gifts, transfers are technically allowed only between immediate family members once ownership has been established.

I posted the above paragraphs because they are excerpts from the Packers official business filings. I thought that it was curious that none of the above mention Football or winning championships, or anything specific to the football organization. I included the Shareholder rights because that paragraph points out how little value our shares actually worth or how little they mean to the organization except as a means to raise capital for the organization.

Take this down to Murphy's level and we can see why the beat goes on and will go on while he remains President of the organization.

Gute is often portrayed as a victim who intended to build the Packers for the future but I'm not so sure. Why? As Murphy proceeded down the path of securing his legacy with the Title town District and his "shareholder sales", he probably included Gute in his succession plan to become Packer President when Murphy retires. Ball is probably on track to succeed Gute as GM. MLF has been hired as the perfect yes man to unknowingly go along with the plot and Rodgers is re-signed to be the face of it all while being a very well paid agitator.

Strategic success is dependent upon strategic alignment. In the case of the Packers Strategic alignment means alignment with Murphy's plan to reach retirement with a legacy versus a plan to win championships. The Packers will remain competitive and may still reach the playoffs in '23 or '24 but we're not going to see real change until 2025 or unless the on field results become catastrophic very quickly which is unlikely over the next 2 seasons.

Ironically enough the one person who could provide the Packers with at least the beginning of the way out of all of this is Aaron Rodgers. If he retires Murphy loses his 'front man". The face of the franchise has become Murphy's face of keeping the beat going until 2025. Rodgers knows the deal. So he meets with the Gute, Ball and Murphy and says "if you want me to stay keep the band together. If not I''ll retire and you guys are on your own." So Murphy tells his minions "make it so I still have 2 years to go." The beat goes on. Where is MLF or MLC in all of this. He's left twisting in the wind with his pathetic coaching hires, his billboard play calling card and his wings flapping to the fans. He goes along or he's gone.

There is no accountability because there are no decisions to be accountable for. Only MLF is expendable because "we kept Rodgers, we have the highest paid players in the league at numerous positions and we let you hire the coaches of your choice and yet you still can't win." That's the deal. That's where we're at as fans and stockholders. As for the fans, keep watching, but more importantly keep paying because we're keeping the band together for your enjoyment.

Remember Bob Harlan separated the business silo from the football silo so that there would no confusion over who was making the football decisions. Murphy ended that structure and he "Crossed the streams." In doing so we now have a version of the Stay-Puff Marshmallow Man as our HC. "Never cross the streams." Now The question is "Who we're gonna call?" Thanks, Since '61

10 points
11
1
croatpackfan's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:29 am

Finally someone to explain correctly the strategy of the Packers. Thanks Since '61

1 points
1
0
stockholder's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:42 am

Ball should replace Murphy. Forget Gute!

-6 points
1
7
jannes bjornson's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:05 pm

No way, get the guy they should have hired day one, Andrew Brandt.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:56 pm

Ball wrecked the roster filling in for TT with Murphy’s approval. That debacle led to both Rodgers and Mike McCarthy having to rise up and stop Murphy handing Ball the GM role. Are you out of your mind?

3 points
4
1
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 02:56 pm

"Are you out of your mind?"

Have you been reading his other posts on this thread?

3 points
3
0
Oppy's picture

January 18, 2023 at 06:11 pm

You are embarrassingly stupid.

0 points
1
1
Since'61's picture

January 18, 2023 at 05:17 pm

You're very welcome Croat. I could go into very deep detail on this but it would take up too much space so I try to summarize some of the highlights. As always I appreciate your kind comments. Thanks, Since '61

1 points
1
0
13TimeChamps's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:41 am

As a current shareholder, I call on all other shareholders to initiate a (bloodless) coup and remove Mr. Murphy from his role as Team President.

I would then humbly nominate Since '61 as his immediate replacement. He seems to have an extensive corporate background and a sincere passion for Packers football. If '61 so deems it appropriate, he can keep Mr. Murphy on to oversee the Titletown District.

This would require a move from the east coast to the Green Bay area. Maybe we could have another stock sale to help accommodate that move.

And please Mr. Since '61, bring a very big broom with you.

2 points
5
3
Since'61's picture

January 18, 2023 at 06:21 pm

13Times I appreciate your support and confidence in me to take over for Murphy. My Corporate experience is in a different industry, specifically Financial Services and more specifically Business Development and Mergers/Acquisitions.

If I were at least 10 years younger but preferably 15 years younger I could possibly be persuaded to change over to the sports/entertainment industry.

I will say that If I were to take over for Murphy the first thing that I would do is go back to Bob Harlan's structure of clearly and cleanly separating the football operations from the business side of the organization. And yes I would allow Murphy to remain and continue to develop and mange the Titletown project until his retirement.

I would have only 3 direct reports. GM for the football side, COO of the Business Side and our Chief Legal Officer.

On the football side I would look for a new GM. The Packers are at a point where they need someone with a profile similar to Ron Wolf's to take the team into the future. Someone with successful experience with other organizations as Wolf had with the Raiders and the Buccaneers. I post this because I believe that the Packers need an infusion of outside thinking in terms of culture, attitude and building the team. I would consider Jersey Al as a candidate or at least consider him as our head of our scouting/draft department. Ball would be replaced by TGR and if he didn't want to be our permanent capologist I would hire him as a cap consultant until we found the appropriate permanent capologist and have TGR interview the candidates with the GM and they would recommend the best for the position.

Once the GM and Salary Cap positions were filled I would let them do their jobs, give the GM complete control of the football operations including the salary cap and offer them whatever support they need. Related to hiring an HC I would ask for the new GM to develop a profile for the characteristics and experience required for the HC position. Then I would ask the GM to provide me with his HC hiring process. One 2 hour interview prior to offering the HC position would not be allowed.

I would then communicate to the organization and the media that the GM has complete control of all football operates and is responsible for hiring the HC and all decisions that affect the football operation and on field results. Also that we are going to work on a comprehensive plan including a timeframe for building a legitimate SB contending team. BTW, I would clearly communicate to everyone including the Business side that their role, regardless of whatever they do, includes helping the team win Championships. Why? Because the better the business people perform their roles the better that the football side can remain focused on winning. This is an added benefit of clearly separating the business side from the football side. The knowledge of who is making the decisions should enable booth sides to remain 100% focused on getting their jobs done effectively. Let the professionals handle it on their respective sides. "Success demands a singleness of purpose." Vince Lombardi. Ongoing, open regular communications can effectively mitigate the silo mentality. The challenge is to build the communication process. Structure it, manage it, support it, lead by example.

Once an HC is hired I would ask the GM, Capaologist and HC to provide me with their plan, priorities and time frame for building an SB contending team. Most importantly the plan must be flexible enough to adapt to unexpected and/or extenuating circumstances like season or career ending injuries to key players, rule changes, etc. No player should be considered untouchable. Everything and everyone is on the table. Commitment and buy in will be expected at every level. A continuing, open and on going communication process would be installed. Any coach or player who is unable to buy into our process for winning an SB becomes expendable.

Bottom line an attitude of failure is not an option would be communicated and installed at every level. Prepare smart, prepare hard, play smart and play hard for 60 minutes. No excuses. Take no prisoners within the rules on the field. My role will be to ensure that our coaches and players have everything they could possibly need to achieve the goal of winning championships. No excuse for me and no excuse for them. End of story.

I would expect to be in the President's role for 2-3 years at the most. Once the team is under control again and everyone understands their roles and what is expected I would use a search firm or firms to find my replacement, including promoting from within so that I could return to being a fan where I belong and to reading CHTV articles and posts. I would offer to be available as a consultant to the team if they should need advice/ideas going forward.

For better or worse that's how I would approach it from the 30,000 foot level. Obviously to get into all the nitty, gritty details we would need a bigger blog. Thanks, Since '61

4 points
5
1
13TimeChamps's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:02 pm

You got my vote. The most compelling thing I took from your response was to get back to Harlen's organizational structure and Wolf's role as a true GM. We can dream I guess.

5 points
5
0
Since'61's picture

January 18, 2023 at 09:44 pm

We can dream the impossible dream! In the mean while never give up! Thanks, Since '61

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

January 19, 2023 at 01:25 am

Since, I believe you might do one more crucial thing. Put in organizational papers that CEO rights are only in overviewing football part and only right he has is to hire GM for football operations (and fire, if needed). To change that structure CEO will need to get two 3rds of votes of all shareholders, including those with just "gratefull" shares. Also one need to get approval to take over CEO position from all shareholders, too.

This would prevent stealth take over the organization.

Thanks.

1 points
1
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:47 pm

Bravo. It seems you've seen this story before; some place hidden between the NY Post and Wall Street Journal. This dysfunction germinated from the 2017 chaos with Ted's health issues and the draft which gave us King vs. TJ Watt and Gutedkunst's guy Josh Jones--epic failure, as the skateboarders say. Then the 2018 coup and as you suggest, the Mutual Admiration Society embrace each other with the secret handshake, forming the Silage Committee. You placed suspicion and incisive queries regarding the LaFleur hiring process, placing spotlights on the problem, day one. Rodgers is smart enough to understand the machinations from the Country Club. Yes, the Rubicon allegory. Right out of "Boy's Life."

2 points
3
1
Since'61's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:09 pm

Appreciate the Bravo JB. If we can see it Rodgers can definitely see it and understand what the machinations mean for him and the team. I think we can also track the change in Rodgers attitude and dealings with the team to the dysfunction which began in 2016/17 and with Murphy's decision to change the FO structure.

I believe that Rodgers realized that the focus on football was being diminished for Titletown and other non-football related projects plus the confusion of everyone is in charge which means that no one is in charge and how it all affected him and the team.

It's all related and until this season Rodgers play covered up the numerous flaws and smoke screens sent out by Murphy. For Murphy's part he understands and decided to compensate Rodgers extraordinarily well for getting Murphy through to his retirement. Thanks, Since '61

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 19, 2023 at 01:09 pm

You're welcome. Maybe Fangirl has the right idea and we "March on Lambeau," burn the Stock certificates and Tailgate about the ten spaces reserved for the Fans on the east lot. Yes, their version of chaos theory creates the deflection pool with fingers pointing into infinity.

2 points
2
0
LeotisHarris's picture

January 18, 2023 at 05:01 pm

'61, you contribute so many thoughtful, quality posts, and this is one of your best. Whether it's silos to silage or paradigm shifts, I can't help but see the BOD heads nod in unison as Murphy sells moving forward with the work with due diligence to deliver results that endure. Just look at The Hill, ffs, and the toilets at Lodge Kohler! Have you seem the giant championship rings? Results!

I also think you're spot on with the succession plan. As the Packers became more corporate, they became, well, more corporate. It's still Green Bay, though, and you can't upset the Martha Circle at Our Savior's Lutheran, or go bringing in some grifter who *looks* different than the locals even if they gots skillz. So, the call will be a local call when it's made, and the beat will go on.

5 points
5
0
Since'61's picture

January 18, 2023 at 07:01 pm

Leotis I appreciate your generous comment. I just think that I have different perspective based on my career as a management consultant and how I look at what is going on within an organization. My consulting hat has made it second nature for me to consider every option, ask a lot of open ended questions like , Why? How? What? When? Who? Also to consider the motivations or lack of motivation by Senior Management in Corporations. I have published several papers and articles on these topics.

U.S. corporations have become lost in their quest to achieve high ROIs (over 15% often over 20%) and generate returns for their shareholders at the expense of employees and customers. I have been very fortunate in that I was able to make a very good living helping corporate executives figure out what they were thinking and where they needed to be focused while simultaneously trying enable them to do what was best for their employees and their customers. But these were companies with 20, 25, 50 even 100 thousand employees. It's understandable that they were lost in their own inertia. But the Packers??? They are an organization of about 1000 employees with no shareholders to worry about. Yes, I know that many of us are shareholders but that means nothing to the organization. They use the shares we purchase as a means to thank us for our donations. An excellent marketing ploy to raise capital and cost the organization almost nothing to execute.

It just seems to me that the Packers as an organization have been losing their focus on football since about 2015.

It's not TT's fault that he became ill but Murphy or someone should have realized it and replaced him by 2016 at the latest. Don't these people see each other just about every day? And if they don't, why? It's just is not that big of an organization. At the same time didn't anyone consider that McCarthy took a huge professional hit and devastating personal hit at the end of the 2014 season. Did they just expect the guy to come back from that. To me it was obvious that McCarthy was going through the motions at least from 2016 going forward. Yet they let him languish as an ineffective HC until nearly the end of 2018.

As for Murphy he achieved his career goal in 2010 probably much earlier than he ever expected. After that his focus became a matter of what else can I do for an encore and for my legacy. He probably figured McCarthy and Rodgers got this and we'll win another SB or two so I'm moving on to the Titletown district.

Rodgers takes a ton of criticism for his attitude, alleged arrogance, personal decisions etc. And some of it is deserved. However he is a smart guy and I believe that he saw the diminished focus on football from the upper management and it pissed him off and has continued to do so. I can't blame him for thinking "well if winning is not their highest priority I'm going for all the $$$$ I can get while I'm risking my health for these chooches." As fans we've complained that the Packers have wasted Rodgers career. Is it that much of a stretch for Rodgers to have felt the same way?

Many fans think of Rodgers only as a player rather than also thinking of Rodgers as a business man and a very astute person who sees what is going on at 1265 and realizies how it is affecting him and the team on the field. All while realizing that he has very little control even if he is allowed to provide input.
Stay well. Thanks, Since '61

4 points
4
0
Oppy's picture

January 19, 2023 at 05:00 am

I think you've made one oversight in your assessment.

If Rodgers was always about winning championships, and he clearly saw that the organization was not focused on winning championships, he could have easily left the Packers at any time his contract was up.

Rodgers could have gone anywhere he chose. On the open market, he would have been paid every cent, and probably more in the bidding market, that the Packers have ever paid him. He could have gone to any organization that he felt was more dedicated to winning football than the Packers. He didn't.

Rodgers has had opportunities to go the FA route since 2015/2016 and has passed on them all. Rodgers clearly didn't realize he would have little control even if he was allowed to provide input, because that was one of his central complaints and bargaining points before his big extension. Maybe he 'figured it out' now that he's just a player, not a part of the front office- but he certainly didn't logic it out prior to learning it from experience.

Rodgers is smart. Very smart. But he's not as smart as he thinks he is. If his outlook was truly that he's going to rob the Packers vaults because they don't appreciate him and support the goal of winning, why wouldn't he rob the vaults of some other team that clearly values winning more than the Packers?

0 points
2
2
Dragon5's picture

January 19, 2023 at 09:09 am

Sometimes loyalty > opportunity; don't forget GB took a chance on him when no one else would. That traumatizing experience is likely branded in his Aaron's memory, even if the person responsible for relieving Aaron's anxiety is now deceased.

4 points
4
0
Since'61's picture

January 19, 2023 at 07:14 pm

Oppy I appreciate your feedback. You have made some excellent points.

As I'm sure you know we could write volumes on Rodgers attitude, idiosyncrasies and comments over the years.

As I look back at Rodgers over the years I think that he was still fine in terms of attitude etc. through the Packers 2016 8-0 "Run the table" charge which ended in the NFCCG in Atlanta with the loss to the Falcons. Rodgers played great during that run but by the time they reached the NFCCG the team was decimated with injuries and the NFCCG was their 16th consecutive game after a ridiculously early bye week in that season. The Packers were screwed by their schedule that season and ended up playing the equivalent of a full 16 game season without a bye. The team had nothing left and Jordy played the NFCCG with a flak jacket.

In 2017 the Packers were 4-1 when Rodgers was lost for the season in the first quarter of the 6th game against the Vikings on what should have been penalty for a late hit. the Packers won 2 more games that season with Rodgers out for the year.

2018 began with a near catastrophe and went downhill from there. Rodgers suffered two injuries in the season opener against the Bears and although he led a dramatic second half comeback resulting in a Packers victory he was not the same player that he had been prior to his 2017 season ending injury.

But 2018 was not only a turning point for Rodgers but also for the entire Packers organization. TT was replaced due to his illness by Gute, McCarthy was fired before the season ended after a dismal loss to the Cardinals and Murphy restructured the FO giving his Gute, Ball, and the HC equal access to him and making them all peers on the org. chart.

Admittedly Rodgers did not play great in 2018 due to his injuries but it is at this point that I began to see Rodgers going off the rails in terms of his attitude and his relationship with the team's management. Speaking for myself I never bought into the Rodgers got McCarthy fired conspiracy theory. To me it looked like McCarthy was done after 2016 and he and TT should have both been replaced after that season. In 2017 and 2018 McCarthy was not the same coach that he had been at least up to 2014/15. Maybe Rodgers realized the same and in the best interests of the team he thought a move should have been made to replace McCarthy earlier than it was done. Although I have yet to find any documentation that Rodgers expressed his thinking that McCarthy should be fired during 2017 or 2018.

Concerning your point about Rodgers leaving the Packers and going FA the Packers did a good job of preventing Rodgers from going FA. In 2013 the Packers extended the contract Rodgers signed in 2009 (his 2nd contract) which was due to expire in 2014. TT never let it get that far. Rodgers third contract was due to expire in 2019 but again he was extended in 2018 (his 4th contract) before that contract reached its expiration. IIRC it was one of Gute's first moves after becoming GM. And of course we know that the 2018 contract due to expire in 2023 was extended in 2022 (his 5th and current contract) following the "We're not idiots" comment by Murphy prior to offering Rodgers this latest extension with enormous guarantees.

Your point is valid that Rodgers could have opted for FA at the end of either his 3rd contract in 2019 or his 4th contract in 2023. The flip side is that the Packers (under Murphy and Gute) could have let either contract expire and allow Rodgers to go to FA or they could have traded Rodgers at any point after 2018. Rodgers has never had and as far as I know has never asked for a no trade contract.

Among all of his comments about the team since 2018 Rodgers has always stated that he wants to end his career in Green Bay. Maybe that is actually true, I don't know. Maybe he likes being a huge fish is the smaller pond of Green Bay, who knows? Maybe he doesn't want to deal with the big city media he would find in NYC, Miami, LA, or another big NFL city. Maybe he wants to finish out his career with Cobb, Bak, Crosby and other friends on the team. Maybe he doesn't want to prove himself again with a new team, fan base, coach etc... Maybe it's all of the above. I doubt that we'll ever find out unless Rodgers discloses that information following his retirement or unless the media finds out or unless one of us gets a chance to speak with him about it.

I can speculate but I can't answer for Rodgers without speaking directly with him about it. Again on the flip side why hasn't the media asked Murphy and/or Gute why they decide to retain Rodgers and do everything that they do to keep him happy. The Green Bay media just keeps throwing up softballs to Murphy or Gute during their press conferences. The NYC media would never let any of this rest. They would smell the blood in the waters and they would go for it hard, really hard until they get answers.

So your point about why hasn't Rodgers moved on is valid but it is a valid point for both sides of this situation. Why has Rodgers stayed and why has management enabled him to stay and enabled this to go on? We're speaking about adults on both sides of this issue. I've come to expect players to be the irrational, mad scientist, artist types in their relationships with their teams. I could provide a long list of Yankee greats and not so greats who have been difficult to figure out over the last 60 years. In fact most of them would make Rodgers antics look like child's play.

The bottom line is that Murphy, Gute and Rodgers are all adults and all should be accountable for their actions. IMO management should be more accountable than the player because they have responsibility to the entire team, all of the players and coaches. Rodgers is only responsible for himself and how well he plays on the field. In fact his recent comment "I could win another MVP in the right situation." perfectly sums up that he believes that he can control how he plays while it's up to the rest of the team and the coaches and the GM for the team to reach and win the SB. No player can do it alone whether they are the QB or any other position on the team. It's never been up to just the QB to win the SB but in Green Bay it has been for a long. long time or at least it seems that way. Why?

Longer reply than I intended Oppy. But you raised a very complicated issue and I haven't even addressed all of the variations and possible permutations. It's not all on Rodgers. It's on all of the "adults" in the room. Or at least it should be. Stay well. Thanks, Since '61
of

2 points
2
0
Oppy's picture

January 19, 2023 at 07:40 pm

I absolutely agree that the Packers themselves have seemingly enabled the behavior and actively sought to keep Rodgers on. It does look to me, 100%, that Gute was full steam ahead with a rebuild and clearly drafted Love with the intent to move forward and away from Rodgers and see the future realized.

Don't know what derailed that train. My guess, of course, is Murphy.

1 points
1
0
Since'61's picture

January 19, 2023 at 09:47 pm

I would also guess Murphy for derailing Gute's plan. MY disappointment with all of this is that when Murphy decided to retain Rodgers Gute had been his GM for at least 3 seasons, 2018, 19 and 20. I would expect that they had discussed their plan and regularly reviewed it numerous times during those 3+ seasons.

Why Murphy, Gute and/or whoever would derail it and end up in cap hell makes no sense to me whether it was over Rodgers or any other player(s). It's just poor management for no legitimate or sustainable reason that I can see.

Maybe someday the truth will come out and we'll get an explanation but I won't hold my breath for that day to come. Thanks, Since '61

2 points
2
0
fthisJack's picture

January 19, 2023 at 08:52 am

Call Ghostbusters!

1 points
1
0
relleum61's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:15 am

Here is what I would like to see written next year after the season about the defense:

(Fill in the blank) Molto bene! Well done, (fill in the blank). Someone finally did wat was needed on defense. He fashioned a cohesive unit and established a culture of pride in performance among the players on the defense. Gutey help by bringing in some players (d-line) that had that experience, but still, someone had to make it all work. The defense was the best we’ve seen in Green Bay in many years, etc,, etc.

Has MLF has inherited McCarthy’s “misplace loyalty” gene? McCarthy kept Capers and Slocum way past their expiration dates. It looks like the same thing is happening with Barry. Here’s hoping MLF changes his mind about Barry and brings in a grizzled veteran like Fangio or poaches someone from SF or Saleh’s staff from the Jets. That defensive coach “tree” is worth pursuing.

4 points
4
0
freddisch's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:21 am

Even if they somehow keep the Band together, this not a Super Bowl caliber team. The offense and defense lines are soft and lack nastiness. No TE who commands respect in the middle of the field . Safety play below average. MLF and his coaching staff are weak. Can anyone who watched the playoff winners this past weekend, feel comfortable that the Band is on a par with any of these teams?

7 points
7
0
T7Steve's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:00 am

I think they're on par with Tampa and maybe the Vikings. Oh, you meant this weekends' winners.

3 points
3
0
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 02:59 pm

Even if we had a TE who commanded respect in the middle of the fi8eld, AR wouldn't throw it to him. In this case, past performance IS indicative of future results.

1 points
2
1
BirdDogUni's picture

January 19, 2023 at 11:07 am

He's always had an aversion to the middle of the field...

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

January 21, 2023 at 10:42 am

Well, it hasn't been always. It started to manifest sometime around 2012 and was on full display by 2015/16.

To be fair, one of the things that actually changed for the positive once Jordan Love was drafted was that Rodgers started utilizing the middle of the field again. At least, the short middle. He still doesn't like much beyond 8-10 yards over the middle, it doesn't seem.

I have to also note that this observation on using the short middle of the field more over the last two season is observational. I haven't looked at heat maps (target maps) to confirm.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

January 18, 2023 at 10:51 am

Gutey, commenting on the can kicking strategy of Murphy and Ball: "The way we’re doing things lately, we’ll probably restructure everybody to make some room."

I did not take that as someone who is "on board" the the goofy, meddling, micromanagement structure of Murphy's Committee Cluster.

Ball has as much power as Gutey and is in complete charge of creating "Cap Hades."

6 points
6
0
coolhand's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:02 am

From the diva himself:

Packers’ QB Aaron Rodgers says he wants to see the direction of the franchise before making a final decision on his future in Green Bay, via Pat McAfee
]].
"If there's a rebuild ahead, I won't be a part of it,” Rodgers said on the Pat McAfee
]].
Rodgers, 39, said if he returns it has to be a situation where they can win it all with several key players being retained such as Randall Cobb, Allen Lazard, Robert Tonyan, and David Bakhtiari.
"Do I still think I can play? Of course. Can I play at a high level? Yeah. The highest. I think I can win MVP again in the right situation. Right situation, is that Green Bay or is that somewhere else? I'm not sure. But I don't think you should shut down any opportunity. But like I said during the season, it's got to be both sides actually wanting to work together moving forward,” Rodgers said via Pat McAfee
]].
Rodgers threw for 3,695 yards, 26 touchdowns, and 12 interceptions to go along with a 64.6 completion percentage in 17 starts this season.

Cmon Gute, time to rebuild!

4 points
5
1
BirdDogUni's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:09 am

So what now?

Easy... Don't offer Big Dog a contract and AR12 is out. If you watched the PMS yesterday, he drew a line in the sand. He said he wanted to play with Big Dog the rest of his career. AR12 gave the organization an easy out and I think he meant it.

He also said he could play at a very high "MVP" level. Not win a Super Bowl, not win a playoff game, but win an "MVP" in the right situation. Whether that is in Green Bay or somewhere else.

Mark Murphy built "Titletown!" Not "MVP" town...

All Murphy and Gutey have to say is, as much as they love "Marcedes Lewis, the organization has decided to go younger." Once they say that, AR12 will immediately request a trade and with as many teams who need QBs, it should be easy for Gutey to get a bidding war going.

Raiders, Jets, Colts, Ravens (maybe), Titans, Carolina, Saints, Atlanta, Pats, and Texans... Just like with JJ Watt, it's all about the money. I'm sure there are a couple of those teams AR12 doesn't want to go to, but he believes in himself, that he can do the impossible.

He set the organization up for an easy out and all they have to do is take advantage of it. Nicely explain Big Dog isn't in their plans. Don't offer Crosby, Cobb, Tonyan, or Lazard contracts and AR12 immediately wants to be traded. Begs to be traded. Then all Gutey has to do is find those teams that think AR12 can repeat Tom in Tampa and Peyton in Denver. There has to be at least two or more teams who feel AR12 is the answer to their prayers.

Hell, Gutey could package AR12, Bakh, and Aaron Jones in the biggest blockbuster trade in history if he wanted to... I doubt that will happen, but it could. IDK who has the cap space or who really wants him, but I know there are guys out there who'll talk themselves into it like Denver did with Russ.

At the time, I thought Gutey was stupid for not trading AR12 last year, but with all the teams not committing to their QBs this year, it might be better he didn't? They gave AR12 one last chance this season to pull off a miracle and he crapped the bed against the Lions.

Murphy and Gutey need to find a backbone, thank Big Dog for his services publicly and get ready to trade their 4 time MVP so he can go win another MVP, because it seems that is his goal for next year, not a Lombardi Trophy...

Go Pack Go!

7 points
7
0
croatpackfan's picture

January 18, 2023 at 11:33 am

BDU, please read the post of Since '61. He explained all regarding Packers position!

0 points
0
0
Packers1985's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:45 pm

Yes, even i want the packer's organization to move on from Rodgers as he no longer worth the deal that he is being paid and keeping him next year is only going to throw this team in cap hell. I am ok with keeping some of the mentioned names like Big Dog, Bakh and Lazard as this team needs leaders coming to Cobb and Tonyan meh. But again it's the organization's decision whether they can afford/worth to keep them all and it's not Rodger's decision for sure. If he acts like one then he has to be shown the door.

But hey taking that "MVP" quote out of context is little reach i would say. He was clearly asked by Pat and co about his performance i repeat again it was asked about his individual performance that's when this MVP statement came. Dont you think if someone asked about the personal performance wouldn't MVP the first one that comes up? He did mention after that winning it all otherwise no point in playing too. Again i am not backing him here I am just saying that it's not right that if we dont like somebody doesn't mean we take some points out of context and paint the person which he really didn't say.

-2 points
0
2
jurp's picture

January 18, 2023 at 03:14 pm

AR's delusional if he thinks he played at a high level this past season. He's a little above average (passer rating wise) at this point.

1 points
1
0
Packers1985's picture

January 18, 2023 at 04:34 pm

No way he mentioned he played at high level and from the interview he mentioned he can still play at MVP level if all the things align well. BTW my topic above is not about whether Arod played well last yr or not. We all can agree that he didnt play to his contract.

It's about Rodger's mentioning playing about MVP level when pat and co asked whether he can still play at that level individually. I didn't find any wrong in what responded atleast to that particular question.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

January 18, 2023 at 12:21 pm

Coaching trees: I'm starting to like whatever tree Daboll comes from. They had an excellent offensive game plan vs. the Vikings, and on defense, the tackling was timely, crisp, and physical. I would love to see more of that from the Packers.

No matter who their coach is, the Vikings always seem to be less than the sum of their parts come playoff time.

Pederson: Did you see that fourth-and-one formation late in the game vs. the Chargers? Three RBs in the backfield, and just hand the ball off to the fastest one, who scoots around the defense for an easy first down. If only MLF/Rodgers though like that....

5 points
5
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

January 19, 2023 at 10:38 am

Daboll is a Belichick/Saban desciple.

1 points
1
0
LeotisHarris's picture

January 19, 2023 at 12:52 pm

Daboll has a really interesting history. He was born in Canada, and raised by his grandparents in NY. He played safety in college, and graduated with an econ degree. First coaching gigs at age 22 (William and Mary, MSU under Saban) then to the Pats at age 24 in 2000 as a defensive asst. Rich and varied road from there to NYG. Hell of a guy!

1 points
1
0
stormin's picture

January 18, 2023 at 01:04 pm

I see all the whinny spoiled children are spouting off again about how terrible the Packers are, once Rodgers is gone and they see how incompetent Love will be , I can say welcome to the 70's and 80's type team !

-9 points
2
11
croatpackfan's picture

January 18, 2023 at 02:17 pm

Wait the announcement about ACR will play another season. Than, in the beginning of September this season starts new 70' and 80'.

Also, I would support you to join Packers scouting team with special task to chose future QBs, so that instead of 20 dark seasons we all can enjoy 30, or 40 dark seasons.

2 points
2
0
Dragon5's picture

January 18, 2023 at 05:43 pm

So it appears we're playing Kick-The-Can / Run It Back v3.0 (eye roll)

Slot WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba, arguably the best route runner in football, needs to find his way to 1265 Lombardi. Impressed with Rashee Rice tape...see a lot of Brandon Aiyuk in him. Sign me up for Beast TE Darnell Washington...story similar to Donald Driver's.

Expectations of Tonyan disappointing in '22 / not repeating a '20 performance a year off an ACL is beyond ludicrous. Just because Adrian Peterson did it a year removed from an ACL and won an MVP has unfortunately sabotaged logical thinking. A motivated Tonyan should be cheap on a 1 year prove-it.

EDGE Andre Carter II...spring loaded...if he can add 20 to his frame...

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

January 18, 2023 at 06:14 pm

Why did you capitalize EDGE?

Does it stand for Evasive Defensive Grabbing Emu?

3 points
3
0
BirdDogUni's picture

January 19, 2023 at 11:58 am

If Tonyan will sign a one year prove it deal, I'm down with that.

Not down with WR in the 1st round, but am totally all in on Andre Carter II as our pick at OLBer. He drops in coverage unlike any OLBer I've ever seen. It seems he has an uncanny ability to strip the ball when within 10' of the opposing QB. (He routinely has strip/sacks.)

Watching the film, he must have very heavy hands, because the ball almost always comes out.

Loved his interviews. I won't hold his playing for "ARMY" against him and this kid should be #1 on Gutey's hit list come the end of April!

First class kid, wicked ability to drop and cover, uncanny ability to get the ball out when near the QB seems like a recipe to survive what is Joe Berry...

0 points
1
1
stockholder's picture

January 19, 2023 at 12:38 pm

Not down with Wr? I am.! You took Rice in your drafts.
In fact, I'm good with anything that improves us in the Red Zone.
The Red Zone was the problem. Most want Safety and a TE.
Yet do they remember Graham, Rodgers, DeGuara, And Jace S..
Tonyan wants to stay, but if Rodgers goes, will he?
And Rodgers wants Lewis. So why draft TE if Rodgers stays?
I'll admit that the TE needs an overhaul. So I'd draft someone.
But Rodgers will never throw to them. Unless he must !!
Where was the Red Zone threat with Jones and Dillion?
So who replaces Lazard ? Because he wants $$$$.
The one who wins the Division. Must win the Red Zone first.
We've had too many failures at Safety now.
HA HA DIX, Josh Jones, and Savage etc.
Drafting a Safety has never been a success. Moving a Cb has.
If Barry comes back. Edge/LB rusher is the right pick.
Because Gutey will pay Gary ending P. Smith Time.

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

January 19, 2023 at 01:49 pm

This TE class is loaded, take two. Even Gutedkunst cannot fu the TE selection with this group. LaFleur's offense has plateaued. It needs to Change. Tonyan is replaceable. The safeties can be stocked with Douglas, Ford and Savage, then hunt a guy Rds. 4-6. The game has changed. The safeties cannot decleat the WRs on the crossing routes any longer. How many Earl Thomas' exist today, or Ed Reed?

3 points
3
0
Leatherhead's picture

January 18, 2023 at 09:37 pm

What do we do from here?

There is only one answer to that question, always. You get up and start moving forward. There is no alternative.

I can see the argument for keeping Rodgers and the old crew, but it's not a winning argument with me. I'd rebuild around Love, Watson, and a killer offensive line.

4 points
4
0
Coldworld's picture

January 19, 2023 at 09:35 am

There is no rational basis for believing that running it back is a winning strategy. If that’s true then the only way is change. That’s the point. It may too be a losing path at first, but it’s one that offers at least the potential for winning eventually. That’s where we are and what no one involved seems to want to face.

2 points
2
0
ricky's picture

January 19, 2023 at 02:42 pm

Could Rodgers be traded? Two teams come to mind immediately: the Jets (which would be deja vu; wouldn't it be weird if Rodgers ended up in Minnesota for a year or two?), and the Raiders. Both teams may feel they need a QB to put them over the top, with the Raiders apparently looking to dump Carr, and the Jets having to decide whether White or Wilson are viable alternatives who could lead them to a SB. But it would take a desperate team to do this. Or stupid management. That would mean the Raiders. The Packers would be hit with a dead cap of a bit over $40 million, but a post June 1 trade would mean they could spread it out over two years. Here are the details:
What Happens if the Packers Trade Aaron Rodgers?

Rodgers does not have a no trade clause in his contract so he could be traded to a team as well. The timing of the option should give the Packers all the way until the end of training camp to move him. The cap charge here would depend on when he was traded. If Rodgers were to be traded prior to June 1st the Packers would take on a $40,313,750 cap hit in 2023. If he was traded after June 1st it would be a $15,833,570 cap hit in 2023 with $24,480,000 due in 2024. This assumes that the Packers did not exercise the option before the trade. If the option is exercised then the trade number spikes to nearly $100 million. There should be no need to exercise the option until the last possible day.

For the team acquiring Rodgers they would be on the hook for the salary for the year. The cap charge would be $59,515,000 if they do not exercise his option and $15.79 million if they were to exercise the option. Rodgers has an injury guarantee of $49.25 million for 2024 but that does not become fully guaranteed until 5 days after the 2023 Super Bowl. If Rodgers was cut after 2023 it would cost the team $43.725 million on the 2024 cap. If he retired they could split that as $14.575 million in 2024 and $29.15 million in 2025 using a similar June 2nd date as mentioned above in the retirement option.

Ususally, this is the sort of decision that gets someone fired, or at least put on a hot seat. In Green Bay? Not so much.

0 points
0
0