Create Account

Or log in with Facebook


Log in

Or log in with Facebook

Best & Worst Case Scenarios For The Quarterbacks

By Category

Best & Worst Case Scenarios For The Quarterbacks

It's time for the fourth annual best and worst case scenarios for every player on the Green Bay Packers roster. This is a feature that goes back to the days Railbird Central had it's own domain.

I attempt to take a look at what is the very best possible season a player is capable of producing, and on the other hand, what would happen if a player fell flat on his face (without assuming they suffer a season-ending injury). These are intended to be extreme scenarios on both sides of the spectrum. More than likely, each player is going to fall somewhere in the middle, but every now and then, they just so happen to come to fruition. Think Charles Woodson last year.

I also try to take a look at what these scenarios would be from an individual standpoint and not what's best for the team. For example, parting ways with Justin Harrell may eventually be what's in the best interest of the Packers. I'm more interested in looking at what's in Justin Harrell's best interests (or worst interests for that matter).

We start with the quarterbacks.

Aaron Rodgers

  • Best case scenario: Most people might think it would be a stretch to improve on a season where you throw for over 4,000 yards, have 30 touchdowns compared to only seven interceptions and have a quarterback rating of over 100. But it's possible. For starters, experience will really start to pay off for Rodgers. As a result, problems getting off to slow starts on the opening possession of both the first and second halves of games will no longer be a problem. The Packers will score more under those circumstances and Rodgers' statistics will improve as a result. Furthermore, due to a combination of both improved offensive line play and better decision making by Rodgers, he'll endure less than 40 sacks this season, an over 20% improvement from last season. He'll have more time to find open receivers and reap the rewards that come with it. Becoming perhaps the best quarterback in the NFL and earning first team All-Pro is not out of the question as is throwing for nearly 40 touchdowns.
  • Worst case scenario: Rodgers becomes his own worst enemy. He has a worse season from a statistical standpoint than a year ago with a drop in yards, completion percentage, touchdowns and QB rating. While trying to do too much and do it all by himself, he gambles more often and his interceptions nearly double from a year ago and he's still sacked at an alarming rate. His touchdown to interception ratio might not be as good as a year ago, but there's no reason to think Rodgers still isn't one of the better up-and-coming quarterbacks in the NFL. A meltdown in any sense of the word just doesn't seem realistic.

Matt Flynn

  • Best case scenario: Flynn makes the most of every opportunity he's presented with. He produces in practices, in preseason games, and regular season games when given the chance. Because of this, he earns the trust of his teammates and while he'll never be Aaron Rodgers, he's able to adequately fill-in for the starting quarterback when the situation arises. He sees most of his playing time during the exhibition season and doesn't fail to disappoint. He completes over 60% of his passes, he has double the amount of touchdowns to interceptions, and maybe most important, he leads the Packers to wins. His trade stock rises and a year from now, the Packers have to seriously contemplate getting a third round draft choice or higher in return for Flynn.
  • Worst case scenario: Due to an injury to Rodgers, Flynn is forced into action during the regular season and fails miserably. Packers fans' worst dreams are realized when Flynn just doesn't have what it takes to be a starting-caliber quarterback in the NFL. His statistics aren't impressive, but that doesn't even matter  compared to the only statistic that matters, the win and loss column. And the Packers lose more than they win with Flynn at the helm. Calls for a proven veteran quarterback become louder and Flynn will have to work his tail off just to win the No. 3 quarterback job by this time next year.

Graham Harrell

  • Best case scenario: Harrell is a breath of fresh air. All the negativity from scouts saying that he doesn't have the arm strength to make it in the NFL just seems to dissipate when he more than holds his own in training camp and the little bit of playing time he gets during the preseason. Seemingly, all he needed was a chance. While he can't do it as well as Aaron Rodgers, Harrell seems to be capable of making most throws required in the professional game. He has yet to put it all together, but there are glimpses of the same quarterback who saw so much success at Texas Tech. Everyone wants to know what would happen if Greg Jennings could just become his own personal Michael Crabtree. It's not going to happen right away, but there's reason to think he could unseat Flynn as the backup quarterback. He forces the Packers to keep three quarterbacks on the roster this season.
  • Worst case scenario: Utter failure. There's a reason only the Cleveland Browns were the only NFL team that took a chance on Harrell a year ago, and he ended up in the Canadian Football League (where he couldn't even see the playing field). Interceptions become an issue in training camp when defensive backs continually jump on his thrown balls. Perceived lack of arm strength is no longer just perception, it's a reality. He's cut in the middle of training camp as the Packers scramble to find another player to train as the third-stringer.
  • Like Like
  • 0 points

Fan friendly comments only: off Comments (16) This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.

some_dude's picture

I think I'd go with best case for Rodgers, a middle ground for Flynn (I think he still has a way to go yet), Harrell I gotta think will flop, I think he was picked up as a real crap shoot and it just so happens that he found some consistency in OTAs.

Asshalo's picture

I always enjoy reading these. The Rodgers Best-case really tugs on fan emotions of what may be.

Tony Wilson's picture

I wouldn't say the Flynn best case is impossible, in terms of him being like a Seneca Wallace-type that people would actually go after.

packeraaron's picture

And don't forget, the Browns reportedly asked about Flynn the week they traded for Wallace. A good showing this preseason and they'll start to get a few more calls...

PackersRS's picture

Rodgers - Best-case
Flynn - Best-case
Harrell - Middle. Shows some good stuff, but not enough to warrant a roster spot. Is put on PS.

Tarynfor12's picture

The Best Case Senario is and will be just that for Aaron for a long time.Although my screen name says it all,I truly feel what will keep that possible for him is he's calm, self-controlled,and understands his role and how to use and not abuse his ability(forcing throws)and keeping the ball on offense(take the sack)or throw it away.He never shows a vengence mentality,which hampers your play.

Flynn may very well be the back-up for the next 10 years and be happy with it.I think he will be very reliable.

Harrell is the practice squad guy and should be safe there as stated,no other team wanted him but Clev and they cut him.Due to no talent or no room with Quinn and Anderson at that time,who really knows.

On another note concerning Senecca Wallace-who was after this guy besides the guy who brought him to Cleveland.He is not a leader ,but sounds like a kind of tea drink-I'll have a SENECCA,please.

bomdad's picture

Seneca is a wine with the sweetness of jolly rancher and the finish of a skin astringent.

bucky's picture

I thought that was Purple Drank.

Too soon?

Tom's picture

I totally agree that Rodgers has all the tools to achieve that best case scenario. Even his worst habit, holding on to the ball too long, I believe is a reflection of one of his best attributes as a quarterback: he doesn't make quick, stupid decisions. The sky is the limit for this guy.

I don't think we'll see Flynn around G.B. for too much longer though, and not through any fault of his own. If you look at the Packers during the Favre era there's a history of training quality back-up QBs and trading them for higher value (take Hasselbeck, for instance). I think part of the reason TT pushed Brent out when he did was because they knew they had a gem on their hands (who had been invested in with a higher draft pick than any other recent back-up) closing in on the end of his rookie contract and if they didn't move then there wouldn't be time to start another project. I agree with you, Brian. I see Flynn continuing to rise this season and if he does I'd expect to see the Packers cash that chip in sooner rather than later.

bomdad's picture

QBs dont win championships by skipping practices. Building chemistry with recievers happens in the offseason.

Like knowing when a reciever is going to drift deeper or come back. Its not the WR's fault, but not really the QB's fault either.

packeraaron's picture


bomdad's picture

Homer Simpson "Its funny because its true"

Oppy's picture

any chance you have a link to your previous years' lists? Would be interesting to do a retrospective and see how your best case-worst case scenarios stack up to how each player's season actually went.

hoogus's picture

From a totally Flynn-centric perspective, shouldn't Flynn's best case scenario be like his worst case scenario, only with him doing well, or at least showing starter potential? The implication behind the combination of the 2 scenarios here seems to be that he's just a back-up, that more playing time will expose him for what he is. That may indeed be the case, but it's hard to say for sure without seeing him perform as starter in the regular season.

Tom's picture

That sounds like it's coming from an anthropologist! It's not a bad point, I can't speak for him but it seems like Brian has assumed that the only role Flynn would ever play with the Packers is as a back-up. And to be fair that's a pretty safe assumption as long as Rodgers is at the wheel. But perhaps his best case scenario should play a little more like the Matt Cassel story. I think it seems fair to say that a when predicting either total success or total failure for a back-up both stories begin with the starter going down.

andrew's picture

rodgers will definitely be better.. i think you keep flynn and harrell.. i think ted likes people named harrell.. develop one of the two into a starter and trade em away in a year or two for some picks keep the other as the number 2 guy just in case

Log in to comment, upload your game day photos and more!

Not a member yet? Join free.

If you have already commented on Cheesehead TV in the past, we've created an account for you. Just verify your email, set a password and you're golden.

Or log in with Facebook



"A school without football is in danger of deteriorating into a medieval study hall. "
"I firmly believe that any man’s finest hour, the greatest fulfillment of all that he holds dear, is that moment when he has worked his heart out in a good cause and lies exhausted on the field of battle – victorious."
"The Bears still suck!"