Although on the Practice Squad, Burks Offers Reassurance in case of Emergency

There wasn't a clear-cut third-string running back choice by the end of August. But, there were some names that stood out during the preseason.

Last year, Alonzo Harris was the favorite before complications ensued and John Crockett stepped into the reigns behind James Starks and Eddie Lacy. This year, Crockett was at risk of losing his gig with the Packers once again until an injury did eventually leave him out of a job. He didn't fall to the feet of Harris, however. In fact, he didn't necessarily cough up his position to anyone. The Packers went into the season-opener with just two running backs - Lacy and Starks - on their roster.

Soon, injuries depleted the group and the Packers were forced to promote Don Jackson, a former practice squad suitor, to the 53-man roster. The pedestrian rushing attack showed no signs of ascending, even after Ty Montgomery was swapped from his primary position as a wide receiver into the backfield. His new role? Playing both spots and being available when called upon, which has been 12 times in the last two games.

Among the final roster cuts at the beginning of September, was Brandon Burks, a former Troy running back who didn't hear his name called on Draft Weekend. 

Burks was swapped out for Jhurell Pressley, who lasted a mere week in Green Bay, only to receive the call from Ted Thompson and company to make the trek back to the team he was initially set to begin the season with. Now, Burks occupies the final spot on the Packers' 10-man practice squad, now filled to capacity. Whether a promotion looms in his future is beyond him or anyone else reading this. There hasn't been many concrete situations this season in which Thompson has displayed even an ounce of predictability.

Nevertheless, Burks can actually help the Packers' offense, which has been bordering on the brink of mediocrity this season despite an impressive showing in the Georgia Dome last weekend.

Burks, who just finished celebrating his 23rd birthday on Tuesday, was portrayed by scouts as a player similar to that of Darren Sproles. When you look at the combine numbers, it's easy to see why.

Sproles' 4.46 40-yard dash was evidently faster than Burks' 4.56, but of course, speed isn't the biggest indicator when breaking down the film of an undrafted tailback. Burks managed 24 of the 225-pound bench press repetitions while Sproles chimed in a notch below at 23, as did he with the vertical jump. Burks recorded a ten-foot reach while Sproles recorded just under nine feet.

Their body types are the biggest resemblance, albeit Burks is somewhat bigger, making it tougher for him to hit the holes the way Sproles did at the peak of his career in San Diego.

Burks was by far the most impressive running back during the preseason for the Packers, leading many to believe his place on the roster after September 3rd was solidified. The Packers instead kept six safeties and with the outburst of talent at wide receiver, seven of those guys as well.

During his four years at Troy, Burks played receiver during his freshman year which eventually attributed to how dangerous he was in the passing game for the Trojans' quarterbacks, Corey Robinson and Brandon Silvers. He spent his final three years at the school at his natural tailback position, tallying 88 receptions for 673 yards and three touchdowns. Miniscule numbers compared to his 2253 rushing yards, for which he averaged 5.2 yards per carry in his college career.

If he ever got the call to the Packers' roster, which currently houses 52 players that still await the activation of Corey Linsley from the PUP (physically unable to perform) list, it isn't far-fetched to assume he would be able to be beneficial. It would give the opportunity to keep Montgomery as a prime target in the passing game while occasionally working him out of the backfield on hand-offs and the rare wheel. Burks can also bring an element to both phases of the offense that hasn't been seen since DuJuan Harris left town in 2015.

Harris, another undersized Troy running back, didn't see much action with the team outside of the 2012 season which showcased the Packers recycling through five running backs. 

Finally, the Packers would have an ideal option to run the infamous toss sweeps that, for some reason, Lacy was the usual option to do so. Burks may not have the speed to turn the corner like you would think Sproles does, but on film, Burks' vision to cut back into the lane ahead is admirable. 

Even on the common stretch hand-off, Burks hits the corner with ferocity:

 

The Packers may not call upon the services of Burks any time in the near future. Especially with Starks ready to make a comeback following his meniscus surgery that caused him to miss the last three games. 

With the odds stacked tall against Burks, having the reassurance of a talented tailback locked and loaded on the practice squad is always a nice alternative.

__________________________

Zachary Jacobson is a staff writer/reporter for Cheesehead TV. He's the voice of The Leap on iTunes and can be heard on The Scoop KLGR 1490 AM every Saturday morning. He's also a contributor on the Pack-A-Day Podcast. He can be found on Twitter via @ZachAJacobson or contacted through email at [email protected].

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (21)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Hematite's picture

November 04, 2016 at 06:03 am

The emergency is at hand.
Starks has been horrible this year and is coming off surgery.
Play the kid.
He would have been ready if Thompson didn't have his head in the sand.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 04, 2016 at 06:29 am

I liked Burks in camp and preseason. He runs with speed and also has some power. Burks was my darkhorse player to make the 53, which he did, at least for a day.
Thompson really messed up the RB position at the beginning of the year to say the least.
Burks played well enough to earn a spot on the 53, then they claimed Pressley so had to cut Burks. Ok, fine, then a week later they let Pressley go. And didn't sign either to the PS. It really made no sense to me.

One question I have is did Burks have an undisclosed injury? If he had an injury at the end of camp it would make sense why they didn't retain him, and didn't sign him to the PS right away.

Hopefully Burks will show on the PS that he deserves to stick around for a while. We could definitely use more depth at RB.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

November 04, 2016 at 07:01 am

Yeah some strange moves by the Packers at the RB position. Got to wonder why Burks wasn't in the picture a while back with the comings and goings on the PS.

Regardless of what happens down the stretch, our backfield will be in motion at the end of this season - again - unfortunately.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 04, 2016 at 07:16 am

Thats why i question if there was an undisclosed injury to Burks. Then they worked him out a week or 2 ago. That also makes me curious about it.

One thing about the RB position though. It has forced McCarthy to get creative with the offense. And it has Rodgers back on track. Having no true RB's for a while may end up being a blessing in disguise.
I like the way the offense is going now. I would like more out of the RB's, but I love how they are using Montgomery in the backfield. Last week seeing them use Adams in the backfield was a really nice change too.

0 points
0
0
Razer's picture

November 04, 2016 at 09:49 am

Yeah, the change of playcalling and creativity on offense has been the silver lining to the backfield problems. If the RB injuries hadn't occurred, I wonder if we would still be looking at predictable, sputtering offense. Having no real RB has forced us to use more guys in different ways and it has sparked Rodgers. Maybe we found another gear.

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

November 04, 2016 at 02:51 pm

More impressed with Jackson than Burks. Jackson has a nasty streak and a violent cut. Got to like that.

0 points
0
0
dschwalm's picture

November 04, 2016 at 12:33 pm

There"s only one person to blame for the mess at RB, and that is Ted Thompson. We can't blame Lacey for this debacle.

0 points
0
0
EdsLaces's picture

November 04, 2016 at 06:53 am

I prefer Burks to Jackson but only because there is more tape on Burks. When it comes to Starks I think we are all writing him off a bit too soon he really hasn't seen that much action this year....

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 04, 2016 at 07:24 am

I really liked Burks in the preseason. He brought speed and nice change of direction ability that we haven't really had from a pure RB in a while.

I really like what I have seen from Jackson so far too. I would like to see Jackson get a few more opportunities to see what he can do. I'd also love to see Jackson get the ball in space and see what he can do in space.

Starks was terrible. Hopefully this time off will allow him to reset himself. He has 24 runs for 42 yards (1.8 yards per carry average). He had a 10 yard run in there. So take that out he has 23 runs for 32 yards (1.4 ypc). He also has had dropped passes. He needs to be better when he comes back.

0 points
0
0
croatpackfan's picture

November 04, 2016 at 07:39 am

I support your opinion on James Starks. Let see what James can show to Packers and than talk about his future with the organization... He might have problems with injury, nobody was recognized until it hurts to much. Than he needed to go to sugery. Maybe he can turn the corner this season again. Nobody knows!

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

November 04, 2016 at 04:23 pm

Agree on Starks. He is unpredictable. Just when you think he has nothing more left to offer, he plays great We shall see.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

November 04, 2016 at 07:56 am

Jackson, Burks. Either way give one a real shot. I dont know how they do it (cut Barclay?, Useless anyway), but I would like to see Burks. Has very quick acceleration and as I recall he fumbled at end of presesaon,which always dooms a RB with MM.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 04, 2016 at 08:08 am

I agree. I would like to see Jackson get more opportunities. He has speed and runs with power. 6 carries isn't enough to determine anything. I would like to see him get more opportunities Sunday.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

November 04, 2016 at 08:21 am

Barclay is still the back up center. Lang could perhaps do it, but he is banged up too. I am guessing Barclay isn't going anywhere in the near future.

0 points
0
0
sonomaca's picture

November 04, 2016 at 02:53 pm

Got Jacob Flores, a true center, on the PS. Barclay offers more versatility. He's terrible at 5 positions!

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

November 04, 2016 at 04:26 pm

Lol. Cant argue with that. Once liked the guy, had nasty streak to him, but unfortunately not enough talent.

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

November 04, 2016 at 08:43 am

I liked Burks from the git-go. The injury aspect makes sense on why they moved on w/o him.
Starks seemed slow so far this season. I can't imagine him contributing much.

0 points
0
0
Ibleedgreenmore's picture

November 04, 2016 at 09:42 am

As much as it hurts they have to keep Barclay, that did hurt to post that. Another injury on the line and well I think you know how bad that would be.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 04, 2016 at 09:46 am

Ughhh.... Seriously hurts... Though I would be tempted to just bring up an OL from the PS.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

November 04, 2016 at 09:50 am

Where is the idea that this year Crockett was at risk of losing his job 'once Again' coming from?

0 points
0
0
Grandfathered's picture

November 04, 2016 at 06:35 pm

According to Larry McCarren, the packers were looking for either Burks or Crockett to step up and grab the 3RB position, and neither had done so at the time Crockett went down with an injury.

0 points
0
0