Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - It's about the "Youtes"

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

Youth movement - Call it a reset, call it a rebuild, whatever you want - there's no question the Packers are looking towards filling the roster with young (and inexpensive) players to methodically get themselves out of Salary Cap Hell in a couple of years. Every draft pick last year made the roster. While it's unlikely all 13 do the same this year, I would wager that at least 10 do. With compensatory picks considered, the Packers are expected to enter the 2024 draft with 11 selections. You can also likely expect some moves made with veteran players for more cap relief (Bakhtiari, Smith, Jones?). Looking at the roster right now, there are only nine players out of 88 with more than five years of NFL experience on this team. That may be normal for the NFL (I don't know), but it seems like a small number to me.

Weapons? You Want Weapons? - Gutey heeded the call, drafting no less than four new targets during the first five rounds for Jordan Love to have at his disposal this season. Shhhh! I can hear the JSN whining going on right now, but I'm just going to ignore it. What's exciting to me is that if Jordan Love turns out to be really good (we'll see...), these players (and last year's WR picks) will all "grow up" and develop together. It's been a long time since the Packers have been in this situation and while it could go in several directions, if they flourish, it will be tons of fun to be along for the ride (yes, even without JSN).

Kickers - It seems the Packers may now have a  measurables threshold for placekickers. Both kickers currently on the roster stand 6'5" and over 200 lbs. 

Playing it safe-ty? - I had convinced myself that the Packers would force a pick of a safety on day two, but they resisted the temptation of reaching for a so-so safety when there were a plethora of so-so safeties in this draft. Personally, I was hoping for a Jartavius Martin pick in Round 3, but the Commanders reached, picking him at 47, just after the Packers' two second-round picks. Of course, the Packers did reach a bit for Jayden Reed with pick 45, so does it all balance out? 

No MO FA - Something tells me the Packers are likely done bringing in any free agents with one possible exception. I had assumed they would look for a FA DL after the draft, as it seems there are always some run-stoppers waiting for a contract offer. However, they spent two picks on DL help, so the only move I could see them making would be to bring Adrian Amos back if the price were right. The Packers did just make moves with Savage and Love to free up some cap space this year and next. My guess is there should be enough room for an Amos deal if he is so inclined to take it instead of going elsewhere.

DBAK - David Bakhtiari had a lot of interesting things to say when he was kind enough to join the CHTV live draft show and stuck around for 25 minutes.

On how the Packers will do: "With no expectations, there's no limitations.... Definitely going to be a transition - it's not going to be easy. "

On play calling: "It's going to be more on Matt and there's isn't going to be much pushback from a 1st-year starting quarterback in Jordan.... I think there will be more emphasis on the run game."

On establishing a new team identity: "We have a young team that's hungry and people are already counting out. Great! Harness that and take it and use that. Use that as an FU mentality all year. I think that should be the first thing we do moving forward."

I especially love those last sentiments. If you haven't seen his appearance, you can watch it here: 

 

McGinn Scout quotes - The best thing Bob McGinn does is his draft prospect series (now on golongtd.com), where he basically just gives you unfiltered quotes from Pro Scouts about players. What always fascinates me about these articles, is how divergent two scouts can be when talking about the same player. Here are a few examples:

Van Ness: “This guy is all ball. All A-plus across the board. He is raw. He will take some time. He’s got some traits like J.J. Watt had.”   VS.   “I don’t see a twitchy enough guy to play on the edge and be disruptive,”

Musgrave: “He’s more of a complete player than Kincaid,”  VS.  “I question his durability and the kid a little bit,” 

Kraft: He can be the best of the group. He catches and blocks. I actually think he’s a better all-around player than (Dallas) Goedert. He’s stronger physically.”  VS.   “At that lower level of comp he doesn’t stand out,” a fourth scout said. “Wasn’t productive, slow, not a great blocker for that level. He’s just OK.”

Reed: “When you’re talking about Zay Flowers and Jordan Addison in the first, I’d rather take Jayden Reed in the third. He’s like the same player.”   VS.   "He’s a little limited but he’s a tough little guy. Slot guy. Not a lot of talent but he’ll find a way to make it.”

Wooden: “Good player. I think he can play some base end and go inside and sub rush. He’s got some 3-technique tools if he can get big enough. He’s a third-rounder. Solid inside player.”   VS.   “He should pay admission to the game. He just stands and watches.”

These are the professionals who get paid to evaluate players. Seeing such differing opinions on players every year should tell us that no one knows for sure and you just have to let it play out. Football players are humans, not robots. Success or failure is no sure thing. So please don't come in here with draft grades or with blanket proclamations that so-and-so was a wasted pick. It means nothing.

Freeman Redux? - Maybe Dontayvion Wicks is really Antonio Freeman's son?

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of many hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He is also a recovering Mason Crosby truther.  Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

NFL Categories: 
23 points
 

Comments (269)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
PearlyBakerBest's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:14 am

DBahk on play calling:

“It’s going to be more on Matt.”

Really gives some insight into the inner workings of the last four years.

Or was he saying Moron Matt?

Things that make you go hmmm.

14 points
20
6
jurp's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:26 am

I thought the second half of the quote was more interesting;

"there isn't going to be much pushback from a 1st-year starting quarterback in Jordan.... I think there will be more emphasis on the run game"

That's easy to read as "Rodgers didn't like MLF's playcalling and changed out of run plays a lot." This seems to mean that the people who thought that Rodgers had undue influence on the field were right.

21 points
24
3
PearlyBakerBest's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:34 am

Agreed. Hence the moron comment of MLF letting him do it at will?

-2 points
5
7
Guam's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:35 am

Spot on Jurp! Bahk offered some confirmation of what has been long suspected - this was more Rodgers' offense than MLF's. Changes in the 2023 offense will be interesting to watch.

10 points
12
2
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:19 am

Yup. His comments were very loaded.

10 points
10
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:54 pm

Of course it was Rodger's offense, as was the Buc's Brady's offense, the Broncos was Manning's offense, and the same with Big Ben, Drew Brees, etc. Veteran star QBs get that level of input into offenses. It's ridiculous to suggest otherwise, or that it is somehow out of the norm.

0 points
3
3
Packers1985's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:23 pm

Lol exactly and in the same comment he did say" since this is 1st year of Jordan love" that meant in future when experienced even Love is expected to make changes on field like most of the top Qb's do

2 points
3
1
Guam's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:42 pm

While I agree with your point that veteran QBs get substantial input on the offense they run, that's wasn't the point of my comment. Perhaps you recall the introduction of LaFleur to the Packers and the front office making a point of bringing in an "offensive guru" from the Shanahan tree to upgrade the offense from the "stale" McCarthy era offense. The question long debated at CHTV was how much of the Packer offense was by mutual consent and how much was Rodgers doing what he wanted to.

Bahk's comments were the first concrete comments from anyone involved that indicated Rodgers changed running plays called by LaFleur into passing plays by Rodgers. They were clearly not in agreement about how the offense should be run. Bahk's comment indicated that Rodgers didn't just have input, he usurped LaFleur's intended plans and altered the game plan to do what he wanted. Input is one thing, intentionally overriding the coach's plans is another.

I don't think that was a ridiculous point to suggest.

3 points
5
2
Swisch's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:29 am

Interesting takes on Bakh's comments -- which do seem to be more evidence of undue interference by our former QB, who may have become less and less interested in and involved with the team even as he grabbed more and more power in coaching and personnel decisions.
That would've been a bad combination to undermine the integrity of the Packers as a team that excelled in the tough moments of big games. We have lost on Lambeau Field to end the season in heartbreaking fashion the past three tears. [Actually, I meant to say years, but tears kind of works, as well.]
In any case, it's so exciting to move on to a new quarterback in Green Bay for this next season who is young and promising and apparently cooperative.
As indicated by Jersey Al, it could be a lot of fun watching the Ute working with the other youtes on this offense to gel together into possibly a dynamic unit.
***
Like Aaron Jones seems to be, a veteran like Bakh could be a huge help, for a season or more (depending on his salary requirements), in this process of growing as a team, a real presence for good on and off the field -- further endearing himself to fans in his legacy to the storied history of the Packers.
I didn't listen to the Bakh interview with CHTV, but it seems essential for him to truly buy in to the excitement of a new era in Green Bay.
It would be understandable if he didn't, and in that case the Packers would do well to accommodate him by moving him to another team.
If he really wants to stay, that would be really good news.

0 points
5
5
BradHTX's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:38 am

“As indicated by Jersey Al, it could be a lot of fun watching the Ute working with the other youtes on this offense to gel together into possibly a dynamic unit.”

Nice, Swisch. Nothin’ but net on that one.

2 points
3
1
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:52 pm

Undue influence or due influence? With a massive amount of more NFL experience than LaFleur and the mind Rodgers has, it's absolutely fair for him to be heavily involved in play calling. You think Brady and Peyton Manning just followed their OC's playcalls? Nope; they were a part of the the game-planning and play-calling every step of the way at that veteran level of their careers where Rodgers is. Big Ben called a ton of his own plays. Savvy veteran QBs often call their own plays as they see how the defense is set once the OC's call comes in on the headset. Drew Brees changed plays as well.

Veteran QBs with 4 MVPs and a Super Bowl MVP can do a lot more play calling than a guy with 1 start under his belt. When Brady went to TB, they changed the entire offense to match what he was doing well in N.E.

Guys at the top of their game at the toughest position to play get to have a ton of say over how the offense is run, including a fair amount of play calling.

-1 points
2
3
jannes bjornson's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:50 pm

No doubt the Church Ladies are out in full force. I'll hike the National Park trails and then go empty a few baskets of range balls. Something more productive. Course opens tomorrow.

0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:35 am

I wonder if we will see an offense that resembles 2020 more than 2021/22. That also happened to be Rodgers' best year with Matt as it seemed to be more along what Matt wants to do on O.

7 points
9
2
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:33 am

I think thats exactly what were going to see and Love will benefit immensely from it just like Rodgers did in 2020. Still dont understand why Rodgers hated Lafleur's offense so much. Doesnt he like wide open easy looks where he doesnt have to make a pinpoint throw for the play to succeed?

1 points
4
3
Swisch's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:57 am

It's actually sad, but it seems Rodgers has become bored and restless and dissatisfied with life in general for the past couple of years or longer, perhaps even depressed.
Maybe he didn't like the easy looks to wide open guys as being too ordinary and beneath his flashy talent.
Maybe he was disinterested in all of the details that go into an offense that creates an illusion of complexity.
In any case, I'm truly concerned about the guy.
I hope the change of scenery does him well, somehow, and that he goes on to have a truly good life.

-3 points
3
6
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 01:39 pm

Swisch, I suspect it was a clear narcissist getting his nose pushed out of joint with both McCarthy, then Murphy upon release of Jordy then Cobb. Murphy saying “Don’t be a problem,” took him over the edge into complete insubordination.

LaFleur never stood a chance.

He’s got issues. Watch after their Honeymoon, and Rodgers starts getting tossed around behind a makeshift OL… where the Jets lose a bearing and the wheel wobbles…

Ooooooooooweeeeeeeeeeee!

-6 points
2
8
cdoemel's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:55 pm

“With a massive amount of more NFL experience”. LaFleur and Rodgers came into the NFL the same year. 2008. But while Rodgers was sitting and watching, MLF was actively coaching and honing his craft. Now I’m certain AR learned a lot too while holding the clipboard, but you said massive amount more. The scourge of comment sections. Loudmouth know-it-all’s who actually don’t know anything. They just make stuff up as they go along as it suits there needs. But that would be about 90% of social media wouldn’t it? Anonymous posting really brings out the best in people! 🙄🤮

0 points
1
1
Slim11's picture

May 06, 2023 at 10:30 am

I had the same observation. Rodgers wasn't playing within the scheme of the offense. Love needs some more experience reading defenses. Once he has that experience, his play should improve.

0 points
0
0
Handsback's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:27 am

Well, shouldn’t the play calling be more on the coach verses the QB?
Call me crazy, but all the things that will change this year…seeing the MLF offense and how it should run is what I’m looking forward to.
Just MHO

19 points
21
2
Ron61's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:24 am

Rodgers possesses enormous football knowledge so you utilize it. He has seen it all and done it all so it makes sense for the Coach to consult with Rodgers in particular situations.

-3 points
5
8
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:38 am

I work in academics and I see a lot of really smart people who can't get out of their own way.

10 points
14
4
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:00 am

Perfect descriptor, dobber.

1 points
3
2
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:02 am

Very few star players in any sport make good coaches, particularly when still playing. Soccer and Rugby historically are littered with them. The perspective required is very different. There is a big difference between input and control.

I read Bakhs comments as implying that Rodgers was the strongest force shaping our O last year. It may be he wasn’t strong enough to get what he wanted and we ended up with a hybrid that pleased nobody, but it clearly wasn’t what LaFleur would have put out alone.

Now we get to see how different it would have looked if left to LaFleur and what that might have meant on the field and what it says about those who permitted that situation to develop and the appropriateness if the Rodgers/LaFleur coexistence.

3 points
5
2
BirdDogUni's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:10 am

"I work in academics..." I'm sorry dobber. Thankless job most days, especially, these days.

Well, I don't work in academics, and I see some really stupid people who can't make change, can't find their ass with either hand, and rarely show up for work, and when they do show up, they're late.

Thankfully, I live on 6 acres away from everyone, so I don't have to tell them to get off my lawn! ; )

2 points
4
2
Swisch's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:23 am

It's becoming more and more clear in our society, and more and more disconcerting, that intelligence is not necessarily wisdom for the public good.
As the historian Paul Johnson writes, the most educated country in the world in the 1930s was Nazi Germany.
Without humility, intelligence can not only become counterproductive, but quite dangerous.
***
As Jersey Al shows above regarding football, experts can have wildly divergent views.
Even well-educated and well-meaning people can disagree, but wisdom includes the modesty to listen to others so as to come to the fullest truth of things in collaboration as a community.
We can have not only incompetent scientists, not only cowardly scientists, not only corrupt scientists, but mad scientists.
It seems to me wise for the experts to even go so far as to listen to the common people of common sense and common goodness.
If we don't believe that, we don't have a democracy, or even a representative democracy. We don't have a government of the people and by the people and for the people, but rather a government of censorship dominated by elitists with self-serving experts.
***
I'm all for listening to the experts, as long as they don't put themselves above us, as long as they are truly public servants, as long as they are humble enough to admit their limitations and mistakes, as long as they are willing to work with us and not dictate to us.
In terms of football, I wouldn't run the Packers based on what the fans have to say, but I wouldn't ignore the fans, either.
As a regular at CHTV for a few years, I truly believe that we the fans have something important to add to the discussion.

-2 points
1
3
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:40 am

I work in healthcare and you wouldnt believe the incompetence and laziness from doctors. Its astounding.

5 points
5
0
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:32 pm

I see them as college students, so--yeah--I do believe it.

3 points
3
0
Swisch's picture

May 03, 2023 at 01:15 pm

Incompetence and arrogance can be a lethal combination.

1 points
1
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:12 pm

Good thing I’ve only got ONE of those traits.

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:51 pm

“I don’t feel tardy…”

2 points
2
0
Handsback's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:38 pm

My wife fought cancer for a year before she passed away. I can attest that your statement is true and that it applies to the back office billing group as well.
I always said you only need a level 2-3 thinker in healthcare billing, but it's rare you get a 1 level person.
God Bless you for having to work in that field.

4 points
4
0
Swisch's picture

May 03, 2023 at 05:29 pm

God bless your wife, Handsback, and you, as well.
I ardently hope you'll be together again one day in a much better place where there is no incompetence, and every tear will be wiped away.

0 points
0
0
SwedeBayPacker's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:18 pm

I'm sorry for your loss :(

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

May 04, 2023 at 06:41 am

Can't give that one ENOUGH thumbs up!

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:01 am

Most of the game planning is worked on in meetings and practice the week before the game. However, veterans are usually more adept to making adjustments to unexpected wrinkles. It's the ultimate team game.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:45 am

That’s ordinarily true, but surely the debate here is how much of that was reflected in what they actually did?

To my mind, that’s history. We will see now what LaFleur can do. That will answer many questions. We may also see what Rodgers can do throwing to Lazard and Cobb for a different coach on a different team, and how many snaps they get. There will be plenty of context to address this debate soon.

4 points
4
0
Johnblood27's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:00 am

Rodgers knowledge sure led GB to a lot of SB appearances and wins, eh?

Maybe he should be GM as well as coach, eh?

He will be a great addition to the NY J-E-T-S, eh?

6 points
11
5
Minniman's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:39 pm

I'm really watching this aspect with somewhat sardonic "interest" - although my primary motive is to see Rodgers get to 65% playing time (and trigger the 2nd to 1st round pick upgrade for the Packers).

There's no doubt that senior players should add strategic value (and be encouraged to do so), but I guess it's a fine line to balance "useful input" to overplaying one's station. Rodgers is kidding himself if he thinks that Saleh will change the Jets playbook just to keep Rodgers in his comfort zone...... but hey, it worked for Peyton and Gary Kubiak at the Broncos in 2016!

Part of me also thinks that (according to his recent statements) Bakh is on the short list to being shipped out too!....... Apparently, Josh Sitton was moved on abruptly a few years ago for being too "lippy".......... putting it nicely, there's still huge question marks if he's even anywhere near close to the same player he was pre knee injury (especially at his cap hit).

2 points
2
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:42 am

Yes, but when 50% (or more) of your offense are unilateral decisions by the qb at the line of scrimmage, you get a less balanced and less effective offense. Theres a reason the coaches in the booth are there. They're reviewing screenshots of the defense to see how theyre reacting to their plays after the snap. Its a chess game but Rodgers was too busy playing checkers based on pre-snap reads.

3 points
9
6
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:55 am

I agree with you on that, Ron61. You'd be stupid to not use an asset like that.

I'm going to invoke Vince here: In preparing for the Ice Bowl, Kramer noticed he might have a chance to get under Jethro Pugh, and mentioned it to Lombardi, who listened, and put 31 Wedge in the playlist. And when Bart thought he could just sneak it in, he told Vince, and Vince said "Go ahead and run it" , or words to that effect.

Any military officer worth a crap listens to the senior NCOs. A good XO will suggest alternatives and give recommendations, but at the end of the day, he's going to do what he's told to do . IMO, Rodgers probably crossed that line more than once, and he got good results sometimes. Sometimes, he didn't. When he was winning MVPs and winning 13 games, you can let that slide, but when he's an average 39 year old of an 8-9 team and you've got a real good guy ready to play, it's a bigger bone of contention.

Love hasn't saved the galaxy or anything yet, so he's going to be a lot less inclined to go rogue.

3 points
6
3
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:41 am

"Run it and lets get the hell out of here!"

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 01:49 pm

Yup!

1 points
1
0
mnbadger's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:41 pm

Agreed in total.
In the past, I've blamed MLF for not having enough spine/nads/guts/etc for failing to stand up to the old qb.
Maybe it was more at the direction from his boss?
If that's the case, I apologize to MLF and redirect my scorn to MM.
GPG!

1 points
2
1
GaryC's picture

May 04, 2023 at 02:00 pm

I still blame MLF. Yes of course take input from 12 but the offense was dull and utterly uninspiring and whatever was in play wasn’t working. When that’s ultimately harming the team that’s on the Head Coach to address. If nothing else surely his pride should kick in.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:52 pm

Ask Bart.

0 points
0
0
blondy45's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:04 pm

Agreed Handsback. Now especially with a roster full of young weapons, it is probable that the offense will be more basic. We should run the ball. We should have many quick passes called. I believe that the young players will get the play call, know what they are supposed to do, and do it. Audibles yes, but not nearly as many as Rodgers called. If a young player did not go to his exact spot with an audible, Rodgers lost faith in that player. The players had a lot of pressure to be on Rodgers "good" side.

Now, the defense can be more aggressive and fly around. I hope we play less zone, more tight man to man. We have CB's who are good man cover players. Put them on an island and rush that QB! With a much better DL (on paper) our LB's should be able to plug gaps. The DL is the key. If our young players hold up on the DL, what a help it will be to the entire Defense.

1 points
2
1
jurp's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:31 am

The quotes from the scouts remind me of the various quotes out there about Rodgers when he came out in 2005. Plenty of professionals thought he would amount to nothing. Perhaps if AR had landed on a team with less competent QB coaches than the Packers that might've been true. Or not.

Maybe these professionals are just as competent at making draft assessments as any of our posters here, which should be a scary thought to GMs throughout the league. I wonder if the ones that miss on their assessments ever held to account for being boneheads?

10 points
11
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:19 am

Beat me to it re:12!
I can remember one scout said he “sees the entire field” and another said “tunnel vision, locks in on one receiver”
Opposite assessments on the same trait!
Unless the second guy was predicting the whole Davante Adams thing.

Remember Princess bride where the guy was trying to figure out which wine was poisoned? He went through all kinds of “analysis” but in the end a person making a blind guess would have the same chance of being correct.
To me, that encapsulates the crapshoot that is player evaluation and the NFL draft!

PS, yes, I know, both goblets were poisoned. The dread pirate Roberts had built up an immunity. Is that the same as being immunized? Spooky.

8 points
9
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:38 am

"I can remember one scout said he “sees the entire field” and another said “tunnel vision, locks in on one receiver”
Opposite assessments on the same trait!
Unless the second guy was predicting the whole Davante Adams thing."

I'd say early on Rodgers saw the whole field but by 2018 he only had eyes for Davante.

5 points
8
3
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:49 am

Never go against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line!

7 points
8
1
BradHTX's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:00 am

Good thing Gute has built up an immunity to iocane powder.

5 points
6
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:13 am

I was dragged to that movie in the theater when it came out. I was like, “Princess Bride”? Are you kidding me?

Just like an NFL scout, I was totally wrong. One of my all time favorite movies! I drop quotes from it all the time, and when somebody “gets it”, I know I’ve added another kindred spirit! So, thanks, fellas!

8 points
8
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:02 pm

My way is not very sportsman-like.

But, I kid. A lot.

2 points
2
0
BradHTX's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:41 am

“The dread pirate Roberts had built up an immunity. Is that the same as being immunized? Spooky.”

I thought the same thing as I typed my comment about Gute.

2 points
2
0
BirdDogUni's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:02 am

"I don't think that means what you think it means..."

; P

3 points
3
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:37 am

Mike Mayock, one of the "experts," was brought into the Raiders as their GM. His drafts were horrible during his time there. Not surprising he didn't last long as their GM.

9 points
9
0
TarynsEyes's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:44 am

Making possible selections for others is not the same as picking for yourself. Besides, and not to stick up for Mayock, but that d-bag Jon 'Chucky' Gruden had final say over Mayock. Actually, Gruden had total control, period. Mayock should have never taken that job.

6 points
7
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:02 am

AFAIK it was Mayock who had control of who was drafted though. Gruden had control of almost everything else.

2 points
4
2
TarynsEyes's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:07 am

No, it was a reason why McKenzie was let go/left. Gruden was given absolute authority over the draft and who was ultimately selected.

3 points
3
0
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:43 pm

I agree that McKenzie was poorly treated and undeservedly so.

2 points
2
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:45 am

Yup and he got the job because he was Gruden's buddy. Any profession has to be more than just a buddy system, on and off the field.

3 points
3
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:28 am

You can be the best friend to your colleague, or vice versa, your colleague may be your best friend - but both should know - job is job and friendship is friendship. Those are 2 separate things and should never ever mixed together, because job will suffer as friendship too.

There is no many people who can divide those 2 two things...

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:44 pm

But it looks so easy on TV!

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:33 am

Rodgers was hugely fortunate to wind up in McCarthy's quarterback school, on a team that allowed him the space to learn and were willing to build an offense around his strengths.

Mike McCarthy built Aaron Rodgers, the HOF quarterback. Rodgers repaid him with insubordination.

10 points
14
4
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:48 am

Couldn't agree more. All because Mccarthy toed the company line when he was 49ers OC by saying he agreed with the decision to take Alex Smith over Rodgers. What was he supposed to say? I work for a bunch of idiots and wish they wouldve taken Rodgers instead? Mccarthy was the best thing that ever happened to Rodgers and Rodgers stuck the knife right in his back. But fans who arent loyal to Rodgers are somehow bad fans lol.

3 points
5
2
NickPerry's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:32 am

"Weapons? You Want Weapons? - Gutey heeded the call, drafting no less than four new targets during the first five rounds for Jordan Love to have at his disposal this season."

The more I read and watch tape of these new Packers, the more excited I get. Even the guy they picked up in one of the 2nd round trade-downs, this kid Wicks, has LOTS to be really pumped about. Wicks was a beast in 2021 but in 2022 he struggled just like the ENTIRE Virginia offense in 2022. New offense, new HC, & new scheme meant struggles. I think he's closer to the 2021 kid than the 2022 kid.

"On play calling: "It's going to be more on Matt and there's isn't going to be much pushback from a 1st-year starting quarterback in Jordan.... I think there will be more emphasis on the run game."

And thank God for this. NOW, we get to see the REAL MLF offense. More TE's because well, they actually have a couple now. More passes in the middle of the field with more motion, and a QB who will actually run plays from under center. I think Dillon has a fantastic year running the ball. No matter what, it's going to be a LOT of fun to watch.

"On establishing a new team identity: "We have a young team that's hungry and people are already counting out. Great! Harness that and take it and use that. Use that as an FU mentality all year. I think that should be the first thing we do moving forward."

Just HELL YEAH!

14 points
15
1
PeteK's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:23 am

Bak should know because a big part of the offense's success will hinge on the O line, his health and the further development of Myers, Runyan, Nijman, and Tom. If they make even a moderate improvement, this line could be very good and help carry this team to a very competitive season.

3 points
4
1
croatpackfan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:42 am

NickPerry do you know why I'm so certain that Jordan Love will be excellent QB at NFL level?
He is rarely mention in any ACR jubling bublings.

1. after 2020 draft he was obviously not pleased but his rare public comment was: "No I was not informed, but I understand why they did it (draft Jordan Love)!";

2. after one year on watching Jordan Love in practices the Hell brake out, just before 2021 draft should start;

3. he did not want to give Jordan Love (and Packers) chance to show what he can do as starter of the game despite his injury (I think it was more about over extended ligaments in his hand/thumb than broken bone);

4. at McAffe show after his "darkness retreat" when asked about Jordan Love he just drop short sentence in tone and pose that he will not talk more about Jordan Love: "He is ready! (to play)". If he is not good and has no talent I'm sure he will be more willing to give his opinion publicly how Packers are stupid to go with Jordan Love. That is something stronger than he in himself.

-1 points
1
2
CheesedDeadHead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 01:24 pm

"No I was not informed, but I understand why they did it (draft Jordan Love)!"

I guess it took him 3 years to figure out his phone would only pick up facetime calls.

I hope Gute has the chance at some point to respond again to the issue about informing Rodgers about the Love pick and he says something like - "we called, but he never picked up. I guess he had some long-term issues with his cell reception."

-1 points
1
2
justjan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:11 pm

I don't think Gute is that childish.

2 points
3
1
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:37 am

Youth movement -
I’m all-in.

Weapons?
This is an exciting, talented group of skill players. Musgrave is huge, not your average “move” TE at all. He can block in-line AND move like the best of the moves.

Kraft is a sexy beast. Not your average “in-line” because the kid can MOVE! Cleans some clocks too, with a passion for destroying the guy in front of him.

Sandwiched in there, LaFleur’s entire bag of jet concept tricks in Jayden Reed. One helluva fast, elusive, TOUGH 5-11 WR.

Lindy’s ranked WR Grant DuBose #19 Overall, directly behind #18, Cedric Tillman.

Dontayvion Wicks? #14 Overall.

WOW!

Kickers?
This was a Bisaccia pick all the way. He knows the Carlson family and Anders’ story. An aggressive move showing how badly Bisaccia wanted him.

Playing it Safe(ty?)
All I know is Sunday’s cherry on top, UDFA signing Brenton Cox, paired with Hurcules, and Gary, and our DL pass rush is going to make Darnell Savage look like a 1st Team All-Pro.

So No MO FA
I could see an NT added to our roster at cutdowns. Maybe. Our DL was just such a mess these past 3 years allowing Lowry, essentially a roster hole with legs, to remain on this Packers team.

I do like Ford, and I’m a huge Slaton fan. Hoping like hell they move Clark back to his natural, more effective NT in a solid rotation. Should be able to do that with Wooden, Brooks added. Plus, last year’s R5 Enagbare (84 1/4” wingspan!!!) & new adds LVN & Cox Jr. can play outside/inside. Quick note: Enagbare might be better inside, w his spin move & leverage.

DBAK
Class act all the way. The “FU mentality?” Bring it!!!

On how the Packers will do?
We want to be free
To do what we want to do!
We just got loaded.
We’re gonna win.
We’re gonna have a party.

On play calling
4 years into Matt LaFleur’s tenure we will FINALLY see his scheme. That says a lot about a tumultuous relationship with darkness. I can’t wait to see the light.

On establishing a new team identity
1. Flounder: “Ohhh boy! Is this great!”
2. The rest of the NFL is sleeping on the Packers. Let ‘em sleep, while they think they can. Zzzzzzzzzzz!

McGinn Scouts
They run the spectrum from great to poor. Always have. Always will.

Really great work, Al, and thanks for sharing.

I haven’t been this excited for a season to begin since 1996, maybe the Woodson/Jordy years.

15 points
16
1
ReaganRulz's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:29 am

Glad that you mentioned Cox Jr, GreenGold!!I was not familiar with him until Monday. Watched some of his highlights and he was impressive. Of course these are cherry picked to an extent. The guy has been an absolute head-case being dismissed from both UofGeorgia and UofFlorida. He sure looks like he plays faster and far better than his testing shows. Hope that he ends up being something!!

https://youtu.be/WfEfEx6nmCk

5 points
5
0
The_Justicar's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:50 am

As a gator season ticket holder I have seen Cox play a ton. His first years he struggled to set the edge - went solo/rogue alot - getting out of the rush lane and giving up big runs. He improved greatly on that bus last year (before being dismissed). He is good at rushing the passer- good first step and good hands. He blows up alot of plays with how fast he gets back there. Also missed like 20 more sacks in his career as just misses the qb.

While dismissed from Uf they did let him participate in the gator pro day so he must not be all bad.

5 points
5
0
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:49 am

He punched a player after a blatant horse collar last year. Foolish, worthy of discipline, but, not grounds for dismissal from the team alone. Instead, as previously, he seems to have been a disruptive locker room presence. Maybe the kid just has socialization problems. I can’t find any knock on his work ethic or suggestions of significant issues away from football. I do note that his handling of the separation was widely commended apparently.

In GB he’s among the smallest fish in the pond. He’s not going to be allowed to be an ass. If he’s realized that, then he’s a steal. He was a consensus top 100 player before the dismissal.

He’s going to have to learn lane discipline and find some way to increase hip flexibility to really fulfill his athletic potential, but, in raw talent terms, he’s going to push Enagbare hard. He’s strong, good against the run if he holds assignment, he fits our prototype.

I truly hope he’s learned. We aren’t a team that takes bad people regularly. I’m thinking that there’s some personal connection and a lot of background work in play here.

8 points
8
0
The_Justicar's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:45 pm

Great analysis. Thanks.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

May 04, 2023 at 06:48 am

Our voice of reason...Thanks CW!

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:55 pm

Good, Justicar! Seems a more mutual, amicable split as described by Cox Jr?

I’m stoked about him, and thought Georgia shafted him. He’ll be fine in Green Bay.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

May 04, 2023 at 08:30 am

I wouldn’t describe it as amicable. If I read anything into the little out there, it was a sense that there was sympathy for him but that he somehow wore through it too much to remain on the inside. I sense they wanted to do as much to help him but could no longer live with him as a team member. Anger no, resignation yes.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:59 am

“Exuberant”described myself upon learning Benton Cox Jr. was signed in UDFA. “Stupid exuberant,” a better descriptor.

Football Outsiders ranked our DL #32 in 2022.

Our run defense has been abysmal since way before the signing of the Smith Bros. How many years ago was that? 5?

Finally, an overt emphasis was made to put that to bed. Every drafted defender excels in RUN STOP.

Good.

UDFA same. Huge.

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:12 am

OK, gg.

If the Dline is the worst in the league, and our DC, Barry, is an incompetent loser, then how do we manage, every year, to put at least an average defense---as measured by points allowed---on the field?

The math on that doesn't work out for me.

I'm also going to ask another question that I've asked many times, and have never received a satisfactory explanation. If an average run gains 5 yards, and an average pass ATTEMPT gains 7 yards, why do you want to stop the run so badly? So that they can throw more?

Take Minnesota, for example. Cousins completes 66% of his passes for 6.9 yards per attempt; Dalvin Cook rushes for 4.5 yards/attempt. If I am the defensive coordinator. I'd encourage them to try to run that ball 75 yards into the endzone, because sooner or later, they're going to get a penalty or somebody is going to mess up and they're going to be in a situation where they have to complete a pass on 3rd down or give up the ball, and if they give up the ball without scoring any points, all those rushing yards didn't really matter.

If we stuff the run on first down, it makes it much more likely that they'll pass on 2nd and 3rd down. There's a 90% chance they'll complete at least one of those, and they average 11 yards/completion.

Plus...a big % of big plays and TDs in this league are a result of a pass. Minnesota has some dangerous WRs. So if they want to keep plugging Dalvin Cook into the line for 5 or 6 yards, that seems to be better for us, no?

-3 points
0
3
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:12 pm

Hey, I’m not Football Outsiders.

You might check blitzing…. I did. Math works.

I don’t think another team blitzed more, especially on 3rd down, than GB through something like the first 12-13 weeks?

Let me add, I’m not bitching about Barry all that much because I think there’s been a completely different tact & focus defensively.

Like everybody at first I was like “WTF?”

Moving away from Pettine required adding completely different players to run what I’ve suspected to be a morph of the SEA Legion of Boom, Dungy’s Tampa 2 and the STL Super Bowl winning D.

They’re going with a D that shows the same “Illusion of Complexity,” theme LaFleur runs on O. This I suspect was the brainchild of both Gutekunst & LaFleur, and they made Joe Barry a partner. My hunch.

One big Safety like Cam Chancellor (Tarvarius Moore) one small speedster who can ball skill and hit from everywhere like Earl Thomas (Antonio Johnson Jr.)… Darnell Savage…?

Stokes originally for the Richard Sherman role. Jaire for the Byron Maxwell role?

They might have missed out of the gate on Stokes (even when healthy, zone not his suit). Enter, Carrington Valentine. High ceiling, zone/press with some solid run stop.

Every DB recently added able to play both zone & man with ease. Speed on the edges. Tenacious DL who can move and make plays. It’s been a 3 year plan of talent acquisition.

LBs who can morph in & out of Safety roles…etc. etc.

Now, we’ll see if my hunch is right.

If that’s what they’re doing, I like it! They needed the LB pairing to start. Campbell & Walker. We’ve in-filled nicely, it appears.

LH, I think this is what we are seeing being formed on D, before our very eyes.

1 points
1
0
13TimeChamps's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:45 pm

"Now, we’ll see if my hunch is right."

I know I said I was taking a break, but I thought I would pop in for a brief update and this is what I find:

Tarvarius Moore is our Cam Chancellor.
Antonio Johnson Jr is our Earl Thomas.
Eric Stokes is our Richard Sherman.

You've gone from trying to replace our entire Oline with draft picks to claiming we now have a HOF defensive backfield.

No, your hunch is not right. Once again.

Back to my darkness and cleansed bowels.

1 points
2
1
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:56 pm

For whatever reason, the Packers stopped blitzing on 3rd Dow with about 5-6 games left in the season - and we were one of the best in the NFL with that.

It’s a mystery to me.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:40 am

Cox also had a pretty unimpressive combine and although he improved his bench at his pro day from 24 to a good 29, he again ran a slow 40 for an edge, 4.8. His did not redo his 3 cone from the combine, which was a very poor 7.57. The rest of his results were just average.

It’s fair to say that those performances would have dropped him in the draft anyway. Was that an inaccurate reflection due to his layoff? It’s also worth noting that he tells the media it’s not his job to figure out why he was released on either occasion and he just thinks his competitive nature was misconstrued. Apparently that was his line with teams at the combine. That may not have helped either.

It’s up to him, he’s going to have to be a better player than he tested as and he’s going to have to have, at least privately, learned more than he is revealing publicly.

3 points
3
0
Bear's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:30 am

ReaganRulz, Thanks!

2 points
2
0
jannes bjornson's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:20 am

Moss was moved by Notre Dame and Florida State and finished at Marshall. HIs own man. See what happens with Cox. He was noticed when Florida' defense was on the field.

3 points
3
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:44 am

Moss was also a once in a lifetime type of talent which is why he was still a 1st round pick. Cox is not Moss. Sure maybe everything clicks and he has a decent career, but Moss' floor was still 5 stories higher than Cox's ceiling.

2 points
2
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:47 am

"Playing it Safe(ty?)
All I know is Sunday’s cherry on top, UDFA signing Brenton Cox, paired with Hurcules, and Gary, and our DL pass rush is going to make Darnell Savage look like a 1st Team All-Pro."

Don't sleep on their R7 safety pick in Anthony Johnson Jr. He only transitioned from CB to safety last season and he did pretty well. He is a heavier and more athletic version of Brian Branch.

"On establishing a new team identity
1. Flounder: “Ohhh boy! Is this great!”
2. The rest of the NFL is sleeping on the Packers. Let ‘em sleep, while they think they can. Zzzzzzzzzzz!"

I hope LVN brings that hockey enforcer mentality to the rest of the team. He wanted to knock the snot out of the other team and if that physicality mentality is transferred to the rest of the team look out. I want a D that will punish the opposing offense. Make them think that every time they get tackled it is going to hurt. They will start getting jittery then and make mistakes.

6 points
6
0
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:23 am

"I hope LVN brings that hockey enforcer mentality to the rest of the team."

There needs to be that shift in mindset. Packers teams have been viewed as soft/finesse teams for a long time. It dulls team speed and allows opponents to set the tone and put you on your heels. This team is plenty fast, but they need to play fast and play hard--and clean--to half a beat past the whistle.

5 points
5
0
PeteK's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:37 am

We certainly got faster and quicker at the DE position which has been missing.

4 points
4
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:22 am

DoubleJ - it’s funny. Haven’t slept on any of our players. I just didn’t want to write an epic visual speed bump. Lolz.

I really like both Anthony Johnson Jr (243 tackles, 14 TFL, 3 sacks, 5 FF, 30 PBU, 2 INT over 62 games and 54 starts), and UDFA signing from Baylor, S Christian Morgan (163 tackles, 7.5 TFL, 2 sacks, 7 INT, 2 FF and 12 PD over 110 games).

1 points
1
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:52 am

Per Andy Herman, Van Ness led his hockey league in penalty minutes. Probably the greatest bit of prospect info ive ever heard in my life.

2 points
2
0
Rebelgb's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:34 pm

Best comment today! As someone who played hockey I agree. I still have friends and family who tell me what a good hockey player I was (I stopped playing in middle school). But the only thing I remember being good at was being meaner than the other kids and spending most my time in the penalty box....lol.

In high school and beyond I was decent at other sports despite limited talent; I think my hockey mentality had a lot to do with that.

NFL should draft more 2 sport hockey guys!!!

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:11 am

I can’t help but think this is spot on:
From Connor Orr at SI—

“Life after Rodgers: I think people may be sleeping a bit on the strength of the Packers’ draft class. My favorite part was doubling down on the tight end position with the Day 2 additions of Luke Musgrave and Tucker Kraft, who will truly diversify this front while helping Matt LaFleur reinvest in the running game. These are big, rangy pass catchers who can block, stretch the field and increase the yardage after the catch in the quick game. I don’t know whether this is necessarily the kind of formational feel Rodgers would have liked. But now that he’s gone, the Packers can fortify Jordan Love and hand him the pieces on offense that can force opposing defenses into base looks.”

I want to add something here. RB Lew Nichols lll is not only a great 3rd down back, goal line back, but that dude is BIG, and doubles as a FB. I could easily see Josiah Deguara having the fight of his life to keep a roster spot.

Deguara isn’t much of a FB-type blocker in the running game. Nichols has some William Henderson to him.

Just a great point though by Connor Orr here. We have a great opportunity to control games now with an even more potent rushing assault.

Would be smart to spread that on thick with JL in his first year QB1.

0 points
1
1
BAMABADGER's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:35 am

G&G you are correct on signing Brenton Cox a troubled but very talented young man. Packers typically pass on an emotionally, undisciplined player. Hopefully, Packer management has established a sports psychologist program to assist, develop, and harness the emotion maturity of some of it's young players. No greater place than Green Bay WI to experience and develop humility. Nothing but positive success for them all, GPG!

1 points
2
1
PeteK's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:43 am

Bad Company's "Rock Steady" should be theme song for Walker and Cox.

2 points
2
0
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:45 am

Colt Lyerla.

He got hurt after he came to GB, but was someone with his own personal demons. In some ways, this is reminiscent of him.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:53 am

His seem to have been a bit more legally significant. Degree aside, I see your point.

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:03 am

Funny, but Gutekunst still has Ron Wolf’s ear. I think he solicits his advice to this day.

Can hear Wolf say, “You know Brian, I signed a LB like that once. Wayne Simmons. Won a Super Bowl with him! Wish I had kept him. We might have won 2 or 3…”

2 points
3
1
Rebelgb's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:35 pm

Absolutely loved Wayne Simmons....

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:09 pm

Lol, BAMA!!!

Thankfully, our failed poster child on the humility part of our tour was shipped off to NYJ.

1 points
1
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:50 am

+1000 points for the Animal House reference 🤣

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:04 am

🤣😂🤪

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:20 pm

Greengold, here is 12 UDFAs, Packers signed:

No. Name Pos Ht Wt College HS Hometown
51 Keshawn Banks LB 6-3 251 San Diego State Rio Rancho, N.M.
57 Brenton Cox Jr. LB 6-4 250 Florida Stockbridge, Ga.
65 Chuck Filiaga G 6-6 321 Minnesota Aledo, Texas
18 Malik Heath WR 6-2 213 Mississippi Jackson, Miss.
60 Jason Lewan DL 6-6 293 Illinois State Yorkville, Ill.
40 Camren McDonald TE 6-4 237 Florida State Long Beach, Calif.
49 Christian Morgan S 6-0 200 Baylor Porter, Texas
44 Henry Pearson FB 6-2 249 Appalachian St Paramus, N.J.
46 Jimmy Phillips Jr. LB 6-1 232 SMU Mesquite, Texas
48 Benny Sapp III S 5-11200 Northern Iowa Eden Prairie, Minn.
77 Kadeem Telfort T 6-7 322 UAB Miami, Fla.
22 Duece Watts WR 6-1 196 Tulane Petal, Miss.

1 points
1
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:46 pm

Thanks croat!!!

Watched a bunch of S Christian Morgan and WR Deuce Watts.

Holy ball! Those are two solid signings!

Have you looked at any? I wasn’t super hot on the other WR, but didn’t get to see enough of him either.

0 points
1
1
Coldworld's picture

May 04, 2023 at 09:04 am

The 2 OL are both very large men Filiaga is a strong OL with some nasty but very limited lateral mobility. He’s 6’6 and 330. Built like T, but with very limited lateral mobility, he’s almost certainly going to have to play G. That’s a challenge at 6’6 unless he bends well. Good at opening run lanes. He isn’t as athletic as Newman but he’s got a similar strength in getting the next level blocking done in the run game, by power as opposed to burst though. There some similarity with Tenuta, who is another massive if short armed tackle that seems to project to G but for his height, but is more laterally mobile.

Telfort is a 6’7 322 pound T with long arms, he looks the part. He’s got some mobility but he doesn’t seem to be the athlete that Walker is or the slimmed down Jones. He plays too upright, needs to learn to bend. He looks more athletic than his abysmal testing, but he also appears to coast at times at others he’s got that nasty. I can see flashes, but I much prefer Jones and Walker. How much does he really want it, and how coachable is he? Why did he test so badly and below expectations? He might be better a little lighter. It could be poor coaching with him, but his technique needs work. I think he’s a guy worth looking at, but whom our coaches will quickly decide upon one way or the other once the work begins as I think it’s as much a question of what’s between the ears as to whether he’s worth investing in.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

May 04, 2023 at 09:20 am

There are still 2 spots open on the roster and in the past one or two have come from tryouts. Not much info on who we are having try out, but I did find this list.

LB Jacquez Jones (Kentucky), undersized 225 LB. Good tackler but marginal athleticism. Better season before transfer last year. Probably a ST profile.

RB Jamyest Williams (Georgia State), tiny RB who was a S till his final year. No idea how he’d fit other than STs. He’s a returner.

S Javon Scruggs (Liberty), tough, hard tackling and working box type but limited athleticism.

OT Isaac Moore (Temple), Projects to G, strong but poor lateral agility. Best in the run game. A lot of experience. Might be one who earns a longer look.

Edge Justin Ademilola (Notre Dame), nice physical specimen who played multiple roles similar to our picks but is probably a 3 tech. Great motor, strong, but borderline athleticism.

P Shane McDonough (NC State),
B.R. Hatcher, LS, Old Dominion.

Normally we have about twice that, but the lower vet numbers and higher number of draft picks may limit it this year.

1 points
1
0
Coldworld's picture

May 04, 2023 at 12:01 pm

Heath is rather similar to Dubose. Tough, physical big receiver with good hands projecting to an X role but capable of playing tough over the middle. Like DuBose, he’s not fast for the NFL level and probably is a big target possession type. Pretty decent from what film I’ve seen. Essentially doubling up on a type.

Watts is a similar type to Reed. Tall and slender, long arms, and an ability to get open through explosiveness, he’s not quick footed. He has good hands, though I think some technique issues that allow them to improve further. He’s just not as athletic as Reed, certainly not as fast as the Packers think Reed is. He’s a guy who could be a decent Y type who will get open over the middle. He will get open, but YAC may be limited.

0 points
0
0
Packer_Fan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:48 am

"So please don't come in here with draft grades or with blanket proclamations that so-and-so was a wasted pick. It means nothing." I totally agree.

Will all 13 picks be stars or at least starters? No. Hopefully three or four would qualify as a good draft. Five or six would be a great daft. It seems to me that Gute likes to select multiple picks in hope that he hits on one quality player. In this draft he did that with TE, WR and DL. Van Ness I believe has the talent to be a starter. There is no certainty, only mathematical chance and the more picks you have, the better chance you have at being successful. Of course there are some GM's that seem to so better. But Gute hasn't demonstrated that yet.

But I sure hope this draft is great!

On a dark note. This salary cap hell was brought on mostly by Aaron Rodgers. Or more likely, it was inevitable. You can't pay one guy 25% of the total salary and not have this happen. So cudos to Gute picking Love because it gives the Packers a chance to reset

1 points
5
4
TKWorldWide's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:29 am

The best place to find ‘dark notes’ is on the dark web.
But I can’t find the dark web.

2 points
2
0
UdderApocowlipse's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:02 am

It's hiding in the dark matter.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:03 am

"This salary cap hell was brought on mostly by Aaron Rodgers. "

More indirectly than directly. His cap hits were never the $50M AAV that was quoted--they were usually under about $32M. The problem came from the cap contraction due to covid and the desire to win in 12's window. The Packers were forced to do some cap acrobatics to keep guys that screwed everything up. 12 is in the middle of it, and his contract seemed to get touched up, reworked, or extended every year to generate more breathing room, but his % of the cap usually wasn't near 25%.

1 points
2
1
packerbackerjim's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:47 am

Salary cap hell was brought on by Gute.

-4 points
1
5
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:13 am

2 seasons of trying to get back to competitiveness fast after the mid teens mess under Ball followed by 3 Last Dances will do that. Personally I think Gute would have nixed the last encore and that he should have been allowed to. One year too far, and while we redeemed ourselves somewhat, we still pay heavily this year in cap terms for Rodgers and other contracts pushed out to keep the band together. I think Amos will be eating the 3rd biggest cap chunk this year, for example.

2 points
3
1
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:19 am

I'd like "salary cap hell" explained to me, by somebody.

According to Spotrac, the Packers have about $18million available after accounting for signing the draft picks. That puts them in the 8th best position. That's Salary Cap Hell?

And yes, this is even considering the $40 million in dead cap that we're absorbing from the Rodgers trade, which netted us Musgrave and the Jets first round pick next year, probably around 25 or so.

If the Packers are in Salary Cap Hell, are 24 other teams in the league in a lower circle of Salary Cap Hell?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

IMO, we should stop using that term. It's not accurate.

1 points
2
1
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:52 am

What you're leaving out are the hoops they had to jump through to get to this point. Restructures have consequences. Here's what we have to look forward to next year: Bakhtiari $40 mil cap hit with $19 mil pre June 1st dead cap hit, Clark $27 mil cap hit with $24 mil pre June 1st dead cap hit, Aaron Jones $17 mil cap hit with $13 mil pre June 1st dead cap hit, Preston Smith $16.5 mil cap hit with $13.9 pre June 1st dead cap hit, Devondrae Campbell $14.4 mil cap hit with $11.6 mil pre June 1st dead cap hit, and Rasul Douglas $11.6 mil cap hit with $5.7 mil dead cap hit. And they're still gonna have to give Gary a monster deal and lock Dillon up. Make no mistake about it, this team is very much in cap hell. Even with the salary cap set to explode in 2024, Packers will be extremely limited in what they can do cap wise.

1 points
1
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:59 am

Jumping through hoops is what we pay the Front Office for. It's part of the game. Look at all the hoops Chicago jumped through so they'd have the most available cap space of any team. Every front office jumps through hoops, some better than others.

You're projecting things that may not happen regarding players who may not be part of the team next year. In fact, IMO, most of the players you named will not be part of the team next year.

Again, why are we in Salary Cap Hell?

-3 points
0
3
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:57 am

In all fairness, I think TGR has laid it out very clearly on numerous occasions. For another perspective, consider the need to convert Savages option into a bonus spread over 4 dead years just to get Love signed through 2024.

This season we are carrying $57 million in dead cap to players who are no longer on our roster:

Aaron Rodgers, $40,313,750 (trade, Jets)
Adrian Amos, $7.950,000 (void, free agent)
Dean Lowry, $3,007,875 (void, Vikings)
Jarran Reed, $1,492,000 (void, Seahawks)
Randall Cobb, $1,391,668 (void, free agent)
Marcedes Lewis, $1,050,000 (void, free agent)
Mason Crosby, $1,005,000 (void, free agent)
Robert Tonyan, $500,000 (void, Bears)
Amari Rodgers, $461,782 (released last season)

Total: $57,143,579

Yes, we are in Cap Hell. I see little point in denying it. The good news is that now Rodgers and some others will be off that list, not adding to more to it in 2024. Then we begin to escape.

3 points
3
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:01 pm

TGR has explained our situation. I understand our situation. What I don't understand is why so many people seem to believe our situation is much worse than most other teams, because it isn't.

-2 points
0
2
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:12 pm

Yes, it is. The difference is that we’ve almost entirely maxed out our wiggle room. Most teams haven’t at this time of year as they lacked our pressing needs to sort out Love and our backlog of prior decisions. That’s why our oft cited “free cap space” number (particularly by the late and unlamented STR) on OTC etc . is misleading, as TGR has explained, and differs so much from the perspectives of Ingalls and other cap experts.

2 points
2
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 01:36 pm

I appreciate this honest attempt at an explanation. I want to make sure I'm understanding.

Most teams have more "wiggle room' than the Packers. You know this because OTC's numbers (or Spotrac) are misleading.

Am I correctly stating this? Did you, or anybody else , actually sit down and figure out the "wiggle room"? Spotrac did the math, and by applying the same math standard as every other team, they concluded we were in better shape than quite a few teams.

You're also stating that most teams didn't have the kind of pressing needs that we did. I'm going to have to raise an eyebrow on that one, too.

As I look at our cap situation, today, May 3, we've got our guys signed, we have money to sign our rookies, we probably have some money left to bring Amos back (which would help explain why we didn't draft one early in the draft). And when Opening Day hits, we'll be under the cap and we're not going to have to release anybody for purely financial reasons.

I don't see that as Hell. I'd call it an efficient management of scarce resources.

-2 points
0
2
SoCalJim's picture

May 03, 2023 at 01:59 pm

Sportrac shows our “wiggle room” is going to be $16,160, after signing all of our 2023 rookie class.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:06 pm

One of us is misreading that. I'm seeing $18 million , and that's after dead cap and rookie signings. Top 51 salaries.

-1 points
0
1
SoCalJim's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:07 pm

I think I’m reading it wrong. Top 51 salaries until the season starts. My bad.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:37 pm

Look at what we have left to restructure. That’s the “wiggle room”. We don’t have a lot left to spread out on players we want to extend in GB and we are pretty close to out on players where we could restructure past their contract. Those we have left are very small amounts and few in number. Most of what we have is now locked in.

0 points
1
1
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:49 pm

I agree with all that, but we have the team we want in 2023. 2024 is a long year away and we won't have the $40 in Rodgers dead cap next year.

We have a tight situation this year. I'll agree to that. We're not in Cap Hell, and we aren't worse off than most other teams.

-1 points
0
1
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:55 pm

Hey, Tiger!!!

Might wanna cool that 2024 pick for AR into an R2, and if by some miracle, that patchwork line of rookies and infirmary warriors can block the NFL’s best efforts (as we came to know for almost 20 years) for 9 or 11 games? Whoosh!!!

Please, please, please!!!

As for the $18M: Rashan Gary + rainy day fund. Like, $1.00.

Lol

1 points
1
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:03 pm

No, it is not Brian Gutekunst responsibility. It is Russ Ball responsibility. By the scheme publicly announced by CEO/President "we are not idiots" Mark Murphy. And part of the blame goes to his direction as he is at the top of the scheme and he has to approve everyrthing!

Make your data corrected, please...

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:03 am

The salary cap initiated in 1994 penalizes good teams.

Not
For
Long

Some teams are just better working it than others. The Patriots 6 Super Bowl victories since the last real dynasty, and only real dynasty since.

Salary cap hell comes from either trying to win Championships, or being really stupid.

Woody Johnson just won a major award in that latter category. I don’t see that working out too well, yet, the ball… it’s oblong.

Lol

0 points
1
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:07 am

"So cudos to Gute picking Love because it gives the Packers a chance to reset"

The best time to find a QB is when you don't need one.

7 points
8
1
PeteK's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:50 am

- The good news is that we have depth/choices which should allow some time for development of our rooks, except TE.
- We have some cap room to sign some needs during the season.

-1 points
0
1
TKWorldWide's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:20 am

If a fan can’t be optimistic at this time of year, I don’t see the fun in it.

16 points
16
0
Bitternotsour's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:39 am

true for every franchise in the NFL. the draft, the arguments, the speculation. at the end of day 3 everyone gathers around to look at highlight reels and think - oh my, this seventh round pick, he might be special...

3 points
3
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 05:02 pm

(Checks for the hundredth time…)

Carrington Valentine
Lew Nichols lll
Anthony Johnson Jr.
Grant DuBose

😂🤣😂

Actually, the Packers R7 is hot AF. All 4 players appear to be fantastic selections.

ROUND 7

Pick #232 CB Carrington Valentine - Kentucky
6-0 193 4.44 (72%) 39” vertical (85%) 128” broad (86%)

LENGTH, SPEED, AGGRESSION, TENACIOUS, MIRROR, FLUID, Changes direction on a dime.

INSTINCTS. Very strong in zone coverage. Also +press-man.

Exceptional athlete. Twitchy quick w track star long speed.

Long arms to succeed in press-man coverage, AND heavy, solid zone experience. Reactive, fluid & sticks to WRs.

Sees routes develop and able to run with receivers. +drive mechanics in zone. Eager to jump slant routes. VERY COMPETITIVE. Takes completions personally. Innately driven and DB Coach’s dream. Led Kentucky in PDs with 17.

Works hard in RUN D.

STs >>> Regular on KR coverage, PR coverage and PR teams

Boundary CB in zone heavy scheme with enticing blend of tools/physicality perfect for NFL.

NEGATIVE: allows big plays +20 (8) Also needs consistency tackling in run game. Just needs to polish skills & technique both coverage & v. run.

Long, athletic, aggressive CB yet to reach ceiling as man cover, ball instincts and technique - all underdeveloped. Zone/Press corner projection.

Pick #235 RB Lew Nichols - Central Michigan
5-10 220 37” vertical!!!! 22 bench

Built. Patient. Coordinated. + decisions at LOS. +physical, + strength, + stiff arm

*** 1848 yds rushing in 2021 - averaged 29.3 touches/game

Bursts through narrow holes at line. Tackle breaker. Quickness & power. Very productive, determined runner. Workhorse.

71 career receptions for 575 yds and 8.1 ypc

Pick #242 Anthony Johnson Jr. - Iowa St.
6-0 207 4.54, 75.5” wingspan, 37.5 vertical (75%) 125 broad (77%)

Tackling, Run D, Coverage, Zone and Man/Press ALL 77%

243 tackles, 14 TFL, 3 sacks, 5 FF, 30 PBU, 2 INT over 62 games and 54 starts.

Versatile, but at his best in RUN D. Tough run defender who flashes press-man & zone coverage ability. Aggressive. Punishing, with crushing blows.

+ vision +recognition +awareness +diagnose +hard worker +explosion +lateral. Fluid reverse hip flip. Both productive and consistent. Needs coaching up in coverage. Converted CB with ball skills.

CB coverage with S eyes. Reads & deciphers quickly, reacting in a flash with nose for ball. Jumps routes. Drives fast on plays in front of him.

Tall framed with long arms. Great plant/cut. Great straight line speed. Great hip flip turn & chase. Active communicator pre snap.

TON of starting experience (4 years at CB, 1 year at S)

Still learning Deep Safety after 4 yrs at CB. Very comfortable in the box/slot. Still getting acclimated there.

GREAT press-man & zone skills. Very good in Red Zone and Screen game. Great at reacting to the QB in coverage.

You can’t teach his effort.

Pick # 256 WR Grant DuBose - Charlotte
6-2 201 4.57, hands 9 1/2”, wingspan 78”, vertical 35”, broad 10’ 5”

+size, + frame, + length, +fluid, +++ routes, +contested catch - OWNS the ball. Rare dropped pass. +balance, ++++TOUGH.

Plays bigger than he is with natural ball skills. +adjusements mid-air. Body fluidity route runner with immense catch point talent. Jump ball weapon. Zone beater.

YAC, STs!!! >>> PR (8.4 yds/att), PC tackle machine.

2 points
2
0
murf7777's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:21 am

“So please don't come in here with draft grades or with blanket proclamations that so-and-so was a wasted pick. It means nothing.“

Best comment of the year!

13 points
13
0
Since'61's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:02 am

That comment aligns with how I feel about the draft grades and proclamations made during this time of year. They mean nothing. No one knows what is going to happen until any of these players step in the field in an actual NFL regular season game. That is why I always to refer to this time of year as the hype/propaganda/speculation season which will continue until the first week of the regular season. When the season begins the reality becomes separated from hype and propaganda. Thanks, Since '61

4 points
4
0
Ferrari-Driver's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:08 am

Good point. That is when you find out if you drafted a Tony Mandarich in the first round or if you signed a Willie Wood as a free agent gem who winds up in the NFL Hall of Fame.

5 points
5
0
Johnblood27's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:12 am

So Since '61, it is Super Bowl season for the minnitonka viqueens...

2 points
3
1
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:26 pm

True, Since’61.

Nothing wrong with liking players drafted, imagining how they fit and where, projecting talent increases at positions, etc. That’s all good fun. Won’t know much for a while & longer.

I’m still waiting to see what we’ve got in LB Tariq Carpenter. Eric Stokes. Shemar Jean Charles. Newman. Hanson. Innes Gaines….

Oops! I think I just slipped into an alternate universe!!!!

Innes Gaines? Still here!

1 points
1
0
egbertsouse's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:24 am

Ah, May! When everything blooms and every draft pick is a future HOFer! I’m not a draftnik so I know nothing about any of these guys but history tells me that a couple will be good and the rest will be gone in 3 years.

10 points
10
0
Untylu1968's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:41 am

I would say there's a lot less knee-jerk HOF predictions as there are instant bust before they've ever had a chance to prove otherwise predictions..

2 points
2
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:41 am

Youth movement -
I call this point in time critical for the future of our organization. Last year we had 11 picks. This year we had 13. That is 24 players in the last 2 drafts. In the last 2 drafts we have come away with 6 WR's, 2 TE's and 1 RB. That is a huge amount of resources put into the offensive weaponry. Next year we will have an extra pick in either the first or 2nd round.
While not all of the 13 players may make the team, right now I am not saying they all won't make it either.

Weapons? You Want Weapons? -
oh we wanted weapons and we got weapons! We added 3 WR's and 2 TE's. Both TE's we brought in are big and very athletic. They will be a part of the passing game. Reed will compliment Watson and Doubs. While Reed will most likely be a slot WR he can play outside. He will be a guy they will likely use in motion as well. He should be an instant impact player. Both TE's should be instant impact players for us. Both can stretch the field and provide reliable options in the passing game. While Wicks and DuBose came later in the draft, they are 2 guys not to count out. All 3 WR's were at the Senior Bowl.
I'm excited to see what our new weapons do, and how they mesh with last years 3 drafted weapons.

Kickers -
In Rich we trust.

Playing it safe-ty? -
Packers could have taken Branch at 45. They traded down. They could have taken Jordan Battle at 78. At 116 they could have taken Jamie Robinson. They chose to not take any of these guys who were all mocked to GB numerous of times. They chose to take the players they did, and decided to wait until the 7th where they took Anthony Johnson. I for one am happy with Johnson. I think there is a chance he starts from day 1.

No MO FA - Something tells me the Packers are likely done bringing in any free agents with one possible exception. I had assumed they would look for a FA DL after the draft, as it seems there are always some run-stoppers waiting for a contract offer. However, they spent two picks on DL help, so the only move I could see them making would be to bring Adrian Amos back if the price were right. The Packers did just make moves with Savage and Love to free up some cap space this year and next. My guess is there should be enough room for an Amos deal if he is so inclined to take it instead of going elsewhere.

McGinn Scout quotes -
It would be interesting to know of the scouts he is quoting, how many of them have been right and how many of them have not been right.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:42 am

Re: McGinn

I always thought he made that shit up. Talking to imaginary guys on the barstool next to his. Truth be told, he probably still gets Ron Wolf on the phone, so he gets that.

1 points
3
2
PeteK's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:01 am

Sounds like me in my man cave during Thurs and Fri drafts. LOL

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:21 am

I would love to know who he is getting these quotes from.

I'm not a fan of McGinn.

1 points
2
1
croatpackfan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:10 pm

"McGinn Scout quotes -
It would be interesting to know of the scouts he is quoting, how many of them have been right and how many of them have not been right."

With no wish to defend anybody, I can say with certain level of reliability that those scouts has up and down years in their assessments as any of those types.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:51 pm

There is a website called TheHuddleReport, and it's been around for a long time, and it has kept track of how various sites have done regarding draft predictions and placement. Do you know who the person/site is who has the best record?

It used to be McGinn. Now, he's not included anymore. But he's definitely wired into the Packers, and that's why he was selected to let Aaron Rodgers know he wasn't wanted here anymore.

3 points
3
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 02:00 pm

Did you read what McGinn said about last year's draft class and how badly he eviscerated Gute for it? He was dead wrong about every single pick they made. He even went as far as basically calling Romeo Doubs an emotional trainwreck who wouldnt be able to handle life in the NFL. I like Mcginn's courage to say things most mainsteam media jockos wont say, but his draft takes are cringeworthy at best.

7 points
8
1
LambeauPlain's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:21 pm

McGinn, since he left the fading JS sports page (and a bit while there), has needed sensationalism and bold proclamations to sell his services. Always enjoyed reading him, but got a kick out of his "scout for another team" supplying his "inside information".

Once in awhile he'd use a named source...once in a great while.

2 points
2
0
Untylu1968's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:41 am

On another note, it was nice to see AR having a good time at the Knicks game last night! It looks like he's connecting with the young players from the JETS. OTAs must be a good place to start that bonding process??

7 points
7
0
RCPackerFan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:46 am

"It looks like he's connecting with the young players from the JETS. "

And then the Jets sign Randall Cobb lol.

8 points
8
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 03, 2023 at 03:29 pm

Gonna miss all those QB demands. Those are all Woody and Jets' fun and joy now.

I like and respect Cobb, but he's more like a groupie in the band now. It is approaching silliness.

2 points
2
0
greengold's picture

May 03, 2023 at 06:22 pm

LP, right with you, my brother!!! You know that NY media is a different animal. So is that Jets fan base.

This is all flowers now. Wait till it goes sideways. I’m thinking we can take a WR next year with what is likely to be Jets high R2.

Rodgers won’t survive with that OL. The Jets just signed Billy Turner for RT.

1 points
1
0
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:55 am

Its not about bonding for him. Its all about the narrative. His profound insecurities have turned him into a slave to the narrative. If he cared as much about winning as he does about whats said about him, the things people say about him would be a whole lot different. Instead, he acts like a clown then tries to convince people hes not a clown. He might be able to see an entire football field in once glance, but he has zero self awareness.

1 points
4
3
Untylu1968's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:16 am

I just love the fact that the JETS are now his little bitch. That shit is priceless..

3 points
4
1
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:55 am

He's finally someone else's problem and I couldn't be happier.

5 points
5
0
Rebelgb's picture

May 03, 2023 at 04:46 pm

1000%. I liked Rodgers as a Packer. Glad I had the opportunity to follow his career.

That being said, any adult who doesnt realize Rodgers is all about the narrative and has been for a long time hasnt been paying attention. Rodgers is the Jennifer Lawrence of the NFL. Hes a hollywood diva and so cal boy who believes in his brand and his brand is his legacy, not his NFL career (though its part of it of course).

Hey thats his thing. Its his life. But Arodge is NOT a football first guy.

4 points
4
0
Oppy's picture

May 03, 2023 at 05:01 pm

Wait a second- isn't Jennifer Lawrence the goofy girl next door type who comes off as awkward and dorky and really down to earth who just happens to be a beautiful and successful hollywood actress?

0 points
1
1
croatpackfan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:12 pm

I just read his comment how last season OROY reminds him (or have some qualities) of Davante Adams. LOL

2 points
2
0
T7Steve's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:51 am

If the D just plays up to the standard we expected last season (I think better), the O is strong. If the line stays healthy it's better than the Lions. Vikings and Bears aren't even close.

These facts and the new additions will allow J. Love to manage the games and win some with surprises.

I wouldn't be far out of line predicting 11 wins or more. Look how a good offense made a 7th round (last pick) rookie QB look last season on the 49ers. Love's a FIRST rounder and going to cook with this O.

1 points
1
0
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:36 am

"If the D just plays up to the standard we expected last season (I think better), the O is strong. If the line stays healthy it's better than the Lions. "

This has been an offense under LaF predicated on minimizing possessions, controlling the ball, and scoring more efficiently than the opponent, but that really requires scoring TDs and not settling for FGs. They had two years where they were really good in the red zone (2nd in 2019, first in 2020) and the last two years where, well, not so much (18th in 2021, 23rd in 2022)...people can argue over how much 12 had to do with that, but that's with defenses we haven't always been very happy with.

There's going to be a lot of pressure on Love to sustain drives and control the ball, and I think he really needs to pick up that red zone conversion rate. This is an offense that should translate well to a toolsy QB who is learning on the job, if he doesn't throw the ball to the other team. You point to the defense, and if they're in the bottom third this year, it will be hard on 10.

5 points
5
0
PeteK's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:08 am

Poor 21 and 22 coincides with the O line having injuries and new players.

-1 points
1
2
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:36 am

Perhaps.

Still gotta score 7s to win.

5 points
5
0
T7Steve's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:14 am

Yes. It all starts with the lines (on both sides of the ball).

We DO have to get back to calling it the "GOLD ZONE". Make the new Kickers a moot point. All they'll have to do is hit extra points and keep kickoffs inbounds a get touch backs when they want them.

4 points
4
0
Since'61's picture

May 03, 2023 at 07:55 am

I Love Bak's comments especially the last sentence. "We have a young team that's hungry and people are already counting out. Great! Harness that and take it and use that. Use that as an FU mentality all year. I think that should be the first thing we do moving forward." That is exactly the correct attitude that every player on the team needs to have. The coaches should bring that attitude and promote it as well.

The comments from the scouts or alledged pundits is exactly why I don't pay attention to any of them. It doesn't matter what they know or say about players. The only results that matter to to them are their TV ratings, or the number of clicks their comments receive. No one ever calls them out for their comments about a player 2 or 3 seasons down the road.'' Following any of them is a complete waste. of time.

The Packers are definitely in a youth movement. The question is will the FO and the fans have the patience it takes to enable a youth movement to succeed.
There are only 3 players still on the roster from the TT era; Bak, Clark and Aaron Jones. Maybe the Packers will yet bring back Mason Crosby but I doubt it. Basically a total roster turnover since Gute has become the GM.

It should be fun to watch, we just need to manage expectations and keep our sense of humor as this team evolves. Great job as always Al. Thanks, Since '61

7 points
7
0
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:17 am

"There are only 3 players still on the roster from the TT era; Bak, Clark and Aaron Jones."

The thing to remember about Clark is that he is still only 27 and doesn't turn 28 until October and is about to start his 8th season. He was drafted at 20 years old!!! Aaron Jones was drafted a year after Clark and is a year older.

4 points
4
0
T7Steve's picture

May 03, 2023 at 11:22 am

Easy to keep our "sense of humor" as long as we still own DA-BEARS!

3 points
3
0
croatpackfan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:26 pm

We will. It is not that ACR owns bears, it is Packers that owns bears...

1 points
2
1
stockholder's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:02 am

Resetting or Rebuild it’s Not All in!
The odds makers are putting us with the bears.
The Bears! What a Fall from grace.
And if Jordan Love Fails like all the other Bears.
We're screwed for years. Giving these guys 3 years.
The security blanket is Gone. Transition is in.
Weapons are only as good as your QB.
And other teams have them too.
But how Gutey passed on Branch for Reed, is Corrupt.
Branch now gave the odds to the Lions. A guy we needed.
A position we needed more than WR.
Driver was a weapon. Taken in the seventh rd.
And thats the Beauty of the later picks.
IMO- Reed will never Balance out the what was there.
And lets just forget Amos now.
You wanted the packers to change. Take your medicine.
Sink or swim says it all. And with No cash for help.
I doubt MLF play calling can help the obvious.
The quotes are great. Especially the positive.
But I can’t help but think that taking the BPA
Was a better way to the future.
Especially; when Gutey had the means to get the higher rated player.

-9 points
5
14
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:28 am

"And if Jordan Love Fails like all the other Bears.
We're screwed for years. Giving these guys 3 years."

If Jordan Love fails then the Packers are picking at the top of R1 next year. That means we can probably draft Caleb Williams or Drake Maye (I prefer Maye as is younger and I think has more upside).

"But how Gutey passed on Branch for Reed, is Corrupt.
Branch now gave the odds to the Lions. A guy we needed.
A position we needed more than WR."

What is this love affair with Branch? The Packers drafted Anthony Johnson Jr in R7, a player a lot of people predicted would go in R4/5. FYI Branch is an average athlete who I think will be exposed a lot in the NFL. Anthony Johnson Jr is an elite level athlete and has more upside especially since he is only in his 2nd year as a safety.

"Especially; when Gutey had the means to get the higher rated player."

Who says he didn't draft mainly the highest graded players on his board? Oh right you read a few draft things from "experts" and think you know everything about the draft.

8 points
10
2
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:39 am

Well said. The Lions are planning to use Branch as a nickel S for a reason. That’s predominantly what he was in college too. He may be a good one in that role, but that’s not a role typically valued as a first rounder, it’s certainly not the pundits’ vision of an all around S and it’s not the one that is our biggest need. In fact it might be the one S role we don’t have a problem with.

6 points
8
2
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:49 am

When is a S not a S? When he's your nickel CB.

8 points
9
1
stockholder's picture

May 03, 2023 at 09:59 am

Versatility is what the packers Like.
Do the Lions have him in the right spot?

-3 points
1
4
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:02 am

Doesn't matter the position he plays. Branch is an average athlete and usually those guys ceiling is a low end starter, QB (pocket passers especially) and P/K being exceptions. Most average athletes in the NFL end up as backups.

5 points
6
1
DoubleJ's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:00 am

As a nickle CB Branch will be exposed even more with his athletic ceiling.

1 points
2
1
dobber's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:33 am

I think big slots will eat his lunch.

4 points
5
1
Leatherhead's picture

May 03, 2023 at 01:55 pm

This is the Lions we're talking about.

Their rich history of defensive backs includes Don Doll, Jim David, Dick LeBeau, Yale Lary, blah blah blah.

Two of their best, Dick LeBeau and Night Train Lane, were not drafted by the team. So that pretty much leaves Lem Barney as evidence that the Detroit organization knows how to draft good DBs. That was over 40 years ago.

Would you like to know what they've done over the last several years?

Jeff Okudah was the #3 pick in the draft a few years ago. They took the great Joe Kerby in the third round last year. Okudah and Kerby were part of the league's worst defense last year. They took Teez Tabor early in the second round in 2017 and dumped him after two years.

If there is any evidence that the Detroit Lions have some insight into what a good DB is, I'm not seeing it. The average yards per attempt against them was 7.9, worst in the league. Branch is going to change that?

3 points
4
1
jannes bjornson's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:56 am

Would have still taken Tillman with the two pick. Maybe they thought Doubs is the same guy? They were fortunate Kraft was there in the third. So some luck. The All-in bullshit was 2019-22 and keeping the veterans. No TEs drafted in 2021-22.
The issue was lack of quality depth at the OT spot. The injuries to Bhak with retreads filling the RT was the achilles heel for the Lombardi. I didn't mind Love because I watched Mt. West games and he could throw the deep out. My perpetual beef with the 2020 draft was if Love, then move picks to get Higgins and secure the double threat for the redzone. These guys are always a draft behind. Hoping Rhyan can show his stuff and fight for a starting job. The opponents know they can Bullrush the interior and Nijman is no match against Hendrickson. The Purple bagged Davenport to team with ZaDarious and Hunter.The right flank is still a concern. Quite a few BPA went before Van Ness. I would have traded down. Not a big Branch guy to begin with. He would be a redundancy at nickel safety. I would take Love over Fields. Our weakest link is Barry. If LaFleur calls another Dbl. reverse, outside zone on 4th and a Yard, then you know we are in a world of hurt.

0 points
2
2
The_Baloney_Stops_Here's picture

May 03, 2023 at 10:59 am

Were the Chiefs all-in when they won the super bowl with 8 rookies playing prominent snaps (an NFL record btw) after dumping Ty Hill and Honey Badger? But you know who was all-in? The Eagles were and they still fricken lost. People like you see to think signing all the free agents and trading a bunch of draft picks somehow guarantees a super bowl. It does not. All it guarantees is a maxed out salary cap and less draft picks.

3 points
4
1
croatpackfan's picture

May 03, 2023 at 12:30 pm

You do not even knows what word "corruption" means. C'mon man. Try to have some joy in your life...

2 points
3
1
Coldworld's picture

May 03, 2023 at 08:06 am

The one theme I see, looking back at the draft, is that QB aside, the Packers avoided high floor low ceiling types completely. Some of that may be due to the way the draft fell, but we consistently took players with great athletic traits who are currently less polished/experienced than other options. We also seem to believe that a down year is less indicative of talent than the existence of an up year.

One could look at this as a RAS over play approach, but I see it as trying to build a foundation to get better over a large class of players. The odds are that these won’t all prove successful, but I think those that do have a chance to be good enough to elevate the team. I do think the initial experience might be more bumpy this way, but now is a good time to work out such kinks and identify and polish a strong young core.

I am not just looking forward to seeing what LaFleur’s offense looks like. I’m very interested to see how camp and preseason changes. Will we now emerge better prepared, will performance result in more opportunities more rapidly, be more truly open?

We may not contend this year but we should see a lot of growth in players and how they are used I believe. I’d rather see an imaginative offense struggle through growing pains than an old, slow one gradually strangling itself through predictability and caution interspersed with the odd long heave.

I’m not sure about the D. The pass rush is deeper again, as is the DL room, but I’ve yet to figure out how the new types fit together into a coherent DL rotation and solution. Will we be better against the run? The same is true at S. I personally think Moore was picked up to play, so how does he fit? I’m not seeing any player that can be an ILB, S and CB in one body (including Amos if resigned), though I didn’t see much in the draft that could either. If the scheme still demands that, I still don’t see a solution.

Kicker: Bissacia called that one. He’s clearly far and away out most knowledgeable guy on ST matters. He also evidently has personal knowledge of this kid. If we are not going to trust him in that circumstance, we probably have bigger issues. So I’m going to let that one prove itself.

As to Clifford, I really didn’t get that. On reflection though, if we wanted a rookie to start if needed, he’s more ready than most in this draft, arguably all but the first two taken. I don’t know how helpful that is, because ready and not very good in NFL terms is of questionable value, but if Love got a knock, if I wanted a rookie to come in and not lose things, Clifford is as good a bet as there was this year. I am, however, not convinced he would do better than Etling in that capacity, but that’s what preseason is for. Both seem smart. We certainly needed more than one going into camp.

If scouting was a less subjective and more scientific process, the draft would be a lot duller. I do remember once being told that there are casual impressions and deep analysis. The former tend to be the first step and later validation, but the latter is what really counts along with background and personality work. The deeper work seldom gets discussed/disclosed. What is available is impressions. I note that the work in Reed specific to the Packers got a rare mention when Sullivan referenced their own timings/testing.

5 points