Buy Us a Beer through Paypal

“Last Day at Lambeau” Stirs Up Lingering Emotions

In order to appreciate the present, one must first appreciate the past.

For Green Bay Packers fans, this is most certainly the case. A franchise rich in tradition, graced by Hall of Fame names such as Lambeau, Hutson, Lombardi, Starr, and White among many others, the history of the Packers stretches back nearly a full century. Each passing year adds to the lore of being a fan of the team, and creates new memories which will be passed from generation to generation.

Yet there is one era which many Packers fans have tried to push aside. Whether it is a case of wanting to live in the moment of the team’s current success, or an unwillingness to celebrate the recent past, the sixteen year career of Brett Favre has, for the most part, been put in the rear view mirror of Packers fans.

The obstacle is, of course, the divorce between the Packers and Favre, and his playing for the Vikings after parting ways from the Packers. The path of events leading up to this were among the most confusing, irritating, and in many ways, sad times for Packers fans. It is a time which will never be forgotten, and will analyzed forever.

The upcoming film “Last Day at Lambeau” does exactly that. It looks back at the events of 2008 through 2010, and offers a fans perspective on what exactly did happen that summer from a number of different points of view, and tries to add some closure to the past, while celebrating current success.

The director, Michael Neelsen, uses a variety of techniques to guide the film on its adventure. From still frame photos to newspaper clippings to video interviews, every detail of that surreal three year period is brought back to the forefront. The memories which had  been buried in the recesses of my brain were thrust back into the present, as I was watching the film saying out loud, “I remember that” as each event was examined by the film maker.

A number of familiar names offer their inside take on what really did happen during the “Summer of Favre” and beyond. Beat reporters Tom Pelissero, Greg Bedard, Lori Nickel,  Tom SilversteinBill JohnsonChris Jenkins and Rob Demovsky are among those who give fascinating interviews, detailing the inner secrets of 1265 Lombardi Avenue. Brian Carriveau and Max Ginsberg, among others, help shape the story line with their own viewpoint as to how the events shaped their view of the Packers.

As the film points out, the Summer of Favre really began several years earlier. The playoff losses in 2003 and 2004 caused some of the higher ups in the Packers organization to question whether or not Favre was the right person to lead the Packers to another championship. The changing of the guard began in 2005 with the hiring of Ted Thompson as General Manager, the drafting of Aaron Rodgers as the eventual successor to Favre, and hiring Mike McCarthy as Head Coach in 2006. By this time, the pieces were in place for the Packers to begin to look to the future, while living in the present, and in some respects the past.

The events which followed the 2007 NFC Championship Game helped create the path that would be taken by both sides in the following months. Neelsen does not offer opinion as to who was right or who was wrong during this time. Instead, the film offers facts, and leaves the decision as to which side was indeed correct up to the viewer.

As was previously stated, it is a topic which will be analyzed and examined forever.

Perhaps the strongest statement to me was offered by the narrator during the final moments of Favre as a Packer. As camera crews were filming him getting into his SUV, the following words summed up that bizarre five and a half month period as succinctly as I have ever heard.

“A few hugs…a few handshakes…and just like that, he was gone.”

Very seldom do so few words capture the moment so perfectly. To this Packer fan, it’s a perfect statement as to how I felt that Summer.

ESPN Milwaukee radio personality Steve “The Homer” True offers an alternative viewpoint, which also hit very close to home. When speaking about Favre’s desire to play for the Vikings while still trying to divorce from the Packers, he offers this pontification:

“So you wanted to play somewhere else, even though you had a chance to win another Super Bowl for the Packers.”

“Wow-that makes US feel real special”

Keyword in that quote is us-the fans. How did this period in Packers history affect us? The film asks us to reflect on all available evidence and determine that for ourselves.

I walked away from viewing “Last Day at Lambeau” with a clearer understanding of what did take place that Summer. Opinions I had about certain events had been verified, while others had been turned completely upside down. Without offering too much of my personal opinion, I will say this: all of the major parties involved-Brett Favre, Mark Murphy, Ted Thompson, and Mike McCarthy-could have avoided a lot of the messiness which transpired if communication had been open and honest from the beginning. If this had been the case, perhaps the bridge from one era to another would not have been as bumpy as it turned out to be.

Perhaps.

Divorces are seldom simple. It is often the culmination of years of issues between the parties involved, and often takes years to repair the damage done to both. The separation between the Packers and Brett Favre is no different. It is not something which will be repaired quickly, and time is needed to help close the wounds. “Last Day at Lambeau” does a fascinating job of examining each event which led to the divorce, and leaves the viewer to determine what caused the events to take place, and when will they be ready to accept the past. While the Packers are currently in the midst of an era which should lead to multiple championships, the past is omnipresent, waiting to be reviewed. In due time, the past will collide with the present. Hopefully by that time, enough time has passed to not have to finger point, and rather embrace history as much as we embrace what is current.

“Last Day at Lambeau” will make its premiere at the 2012 Wisconsin Film Festival April 18-22. Be sure and follow the film on Twitter and “like” the film’s Facebook page.

Here is the teaser trailer for the film:

Filed Under: John Rehor

Tags:

RSSComments (19)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. Adam Czech says:

    Thanks for posting this, John. Good read, as always.

    But my question is this: Does the film reveal anything new?

    I guess I’m struggling as to why I’d want to watch it. I followed the saga daily as it unfolded and really don’t feel like I need to have everything I already know summed up in film form.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • John Rehor says:

      It does. A few nuggets that I did not know were revealed. Not going to give it away for obvious reasons, but it does give some new insight on some of the details from that time period in Packers history.

      VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. TedTheSledge says:

    Just curious did they go into his statements to Ed Werder in a rambling sitdown interview after his retirement from the Jets? To anyone familiar with the timeline of events him saying this about his season in NY had to burn:

    “Favre said the soreness in his throwing shoulder actually started last summer when he started throwing while preparing to return to the NFL. At the time he thought it was a minor pain that goes with aging, but when he joined the Jets it slowly got worse”

    Since he never worked out when he got to GB he hurt his shoulder throwing to HS kids and showing off for the cameras. That means he stepped off the plane on family night knowing he had a problem. More Brett Maverick than Brett Favre to me … bluffing all the way. He couldn’t have beat out Blair Kiel much less Rodgers.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • John Rehor says:

      I will say this was not covered. I don’t believe any of the ESPN reports were used in the film-focus was from the local reporters.

      If memory serves, the press conf following his meeting with Favre McCarthy said Favre had a strain of some kind based on the results of his physical. Whether this true or not is unclear, but if it was it leads credence to your thought. We will probably never know the truth though.

      VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
      • TedTheSledge says:

        I remember that as an abdominal strain that popped up in his physical… MM said at the time it was not surprising for somebody trying to get into shape in a hurry. I don’t think anyone but Brett knew about the shoulder except maybe Deanna. He lasted all of 5 practices in NY before the Jets had to lighten his workload.

        VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
        Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
        • John Rehor says:

          That sounds right. As soon as you said abdominal strain I said “Yep, I remember that” just like I did a number of times while watching the film.

          Was his arm injured when he got to GB? Probably. But by that time it was pretty obvious (in my opinion, anyways) that he wasn’t going to be in GB for the 2008 season. And one would have to think he would have had to have passed a physical for the trade to be approved. So…

          VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
          Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
          • TedTheSledge says:

            Agree he probably knew he would not be in GB. But think what that would say about him if he truly was ready to push his way back in knowing he was not the best option and affecting the other 52 guys.
            I think besides GB giving him his outright release he NEEDED GB to trade him somewhere he would not have to compete to be starter. TB had the feisty garcia who was itchin to go head to head and TB would not get rid of him to pave the way. The Jets were willing to jettison Pennington and hand him the job. Whether the Jets demanded a physical or not when they were so gung ho to sell PSL’s is another unknown.

            VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
            Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
            • John Rehor says:

              The great thing is you’re tackling a subject that wasn’t even addressed in the film, whether he was healthy or not when he arrived in GB.

              Without going into great detail, I would not be surprised if his arm was dead when he walked into GB. After all that transpired that summer, what’s one more surprise that’s yet to be officially uncovered between two divorcees. ;)

              VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
              Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • Great note, TedTheSledge.

      We knew about the Ed Werder interview (one among many other interviews Brett submitted to) but in the end couldn’t justify lengthening the film to accommodate it.

      This film has a very specific controlling idea – our slogan: “The pride of a town hinged on the demise of their greatest hero.” Anything that didn’t fit into that theme got cut (the first cut of LDAL was over 2 hours and 20 minutes long).

      After all, you guys are a captive audience. I didn’t want to bore you with just endless facts and bullet points. : )

      Hope to see you in Madison in April! (and thanks for the killer review, John)

      VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  3. Shannon says:

    I don’t think his arm was dead when he arrived at GB. You’re forgetting that he played well for the Jets until the bicep tear near the end of the season.

    So I can’t see where his arm could’ve been dead when he arrived at GB, then suddenly was fine again during most of the 2008 season with the Jets. IMO

    As for the Jets having to lighten his load after he said his arm was fatigued, that didn’t surprise me. If memory serves, he said that after throwing over 100 passes in one practice. That and him being 38 going on 39 may have had something to do with his arm being fatigued. IMO Not necessarily a dead arm. IMO

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
    • JohnRehor says:

      Dead. Fatigued. Completely healthy. Anywhere in between is where the health of his arm could have been at that time. Again, we don’t know.

      His arm could have been 100% healthy and the decision to move on to Rodgers could have already been made. Also, as the film does point out, he could have been completely healthy and chosen to stay in GB. We will probably never know all of the in betweens. And that is the most frustrating part.

      VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. The Ultimate Packer Fan says:

    John, I think what we have all forgotten is how far back Favre and Thompson’s difference’s began. Initially the feud may have begun when Favre begged to bring Randy Moss to GB. Thompson denied him that chance to have a great receiver on his team. Brett was not accustomed to being denied.Thompson knew the team belonged to Brett and until Brett was gone Thompson knew he would never take total control. The battle had been brewing for a long time between the two and Thompson had to take advantage of Brett’s decision making and the divorce proceeding began. When Brett parted ways with GB he had a personal vengeance to prove; he still had what it took to play football and win. I don’t condone him for doing that. He proved himself with the Jets and again with the Vikings. I really believe that Brett just wanted to play football and who would take him didn’t matter, he just wanted to play football. Like any other relationship that ends up in divorce time will heal the wounds. Soon all will be forgotton and you’ll see Brett Favre back on Lambeau Field during an emotional ceremony as the #4 unveils on the Ring of Honor.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)
    • John Rehor says:

      My review was not intended to be pro Favre, anti Rodgers, any combination of the above or anything I might have left out. What the film does is revisit that time period and go step by step through the process fans had to go through in that 3 year period. If that is how it came across it was completely unintentional. I assure you I have my own ideas as to what would/should happen with #4 in the future, regardless of the last few years, and in due time I’ll speak my mind.

      Thanks for reading!

      VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
      Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. I am looking forward to it’s showing.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. I swear to god I didn’t read your post before mine. I think I stole each of your ideas, and a few sentences word for word. Great read John

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. toolkien says:

    our slogan: “The pride of a town hinged on the demise of their greatest hero.”
    ————————————

    And there’s no bias contained in that “controlling idea”? Favre burned his legacy, no one took if from him.

    The fact that only local people were used will also slant the narrative. Favre used Foxnews (Greta) and ESPN (Werder and Mortensen) as his public relations firm, if none of that is used or referred to (licensing?), then the narrative is so incomplete as to be useless. No wonder I’ve heard little to nothing about this “documentary”. And Favre and/or his camp contributed nothing as well.

    Get the whole thing up on youtube because I’m not parting with one thin dime to see the content.

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. 3ndofni6li8, 5731 payday loans [url=http://paydaynloansonlinez.webeden.co.uk]payday loans quincy il[/url] payday loans 5647 [url=http://paydayloansukpaydayloanspaydayloanspaydayloans.co.uk]payday loans[/url] payday loans in nc 7544 a-kasse [url=http://www.akasser.net/]a kasse sygeplejerske[/url] a-kasse

    VA:F [1.9.13_1145]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply




If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar.

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.