<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Keys to 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Globalpack</title>
		<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/#comment-6081</link>
		<dc:creator>Globalpack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packerslounge.com/?p=6453#comment-6081</guid>
		<description>What is dangerous is that improved O-line play didn&#039;t even make the top ten.  The O-line last year was inconsistent and bad establishing the run.  This year the Center, RG and RT could be new starters.  How the OL plays is probably a big key to &#039;09 success and it can&#039;t even crack the top ten of question marks for the &#039;09 season.  I think the Packers will be greatly improved over last year, but a lot of pieces really need to come together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is dangerous is that improved O-line play didn&#8217;t even make the top ten.  The O-line last year was inconsistent and bad establishing the run.  This year the Center, RG and RT could be new starters.  How the OL plays is probably a big key to &#8217;09 success and it can&#8217;t even crack the top ten of question marks for the &#8217;09 season.  I think the <a href="http://packers.com" target='_blank' >Packers</a> will be greatly improved over last year, but a lot of pieces really need to come together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PackersRS</title>
		<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/#comment-6080</link>
		<dc:creator>PackersRS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packerslounge.com/?p=6453#comment-6080</guid>
		<description>With punter, ST play all along. Except for Blackmon, it was horrid. Jarret freaking Bush was the tackling leader in ST. That says A LOT about our performance. TT apparently solved that problem, drafting ST standout after ST standout. 3 were selected ST Player of the Year by their teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With punter, ST play all along. Except for Blackmon, it was horrid. Jarret freaking Bush was the tackling leader in ST. That says A LOT about our performance. TT apparently solved that problem, drafting ST standout after ST standout. 3 were selected ST Player of the Year by their teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jersey Al</title>
		<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/#comment-6079</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersey Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packerslounge.com/?p=6453#comment-6079</guid>
		<description>I think Raji and Jenkins should be grouped together at #2 because they are our Plan A, B, C and D. We have little behind them.

Many would call me crazy, but I would put punting at #3. If you look at the field position stats from last year, it&#039;s a horror show. Field position determines the outcome of many games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Raji and Jenkins should be grouped together at #2 because they are our Plan A, B, C and D. We have little behind them.</p>
<p>Many would call me crazy, but I would put punting at #3. If you look at the field position stats from last year, it&#8217;s a horror show. Field position determines the outcome of many games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Case</title>
		<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/#comment-6078</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packerslounge.com/?p=6453#comment-6078</guid>
		<description>Lets not get too giddy on Jeremy Thompson, he&#039;s only showed &#039;something&#039; in the OTAs. As Alan Barbre has showed it&#039;s training camp where the truth is really found. I think Mathews jumps ahead at Training Camp for sure. Thompson couldn&#039;t do a thing last season (albeit in a 4-3 DE capacity) why should he be hugely better in the 3-4?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not get too giddy on Jeremy Thompson, he&#8217;s only showed &#8216;something&#8217; in the OTAs. As Alan Barbre has showed it&#8217;s training camp where the truth is really found. I think Mathews jumps ahead at Training Camp for sure. Thompson couldn&#8217;t do a thing last season (albeit in a 4-3 DE capacity) why should he be hugely better in the 3-4?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asshalo</title>
		<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/#comment-6077</link>
		<dc:creator>Asshalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packerslounge.com/?p=6453#comment-6077</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t necesarily agree with Collins. The 3-4 is such a decentralized, communication-reliant scheme that we can&#039;t afford any dummies on defense. They need to be intuitively smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t necesarily agree with Collins. The 3-4 is such a decentralized, communication-reliant scheme that we can&#8217;t afford any dummies on defense. They need to be intuitively smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asshalo</title>
		<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/#comment-6076</link>
		<dc:creator>Asshalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packerslounge.com/?p=6453#comment-6076</guid>
		<description>Nice Post. Very true that the majority of our question marks come on the defensive side of the ball. Our early schedule being easier may help the transition. I have faith Capers will make due. He&#039;s turned around a lot of defenses. They don&#039;t need to be great-- like in 2007. Our overall stats weren&#039;t amazing, but we kept points off the board.

Normally &quot;10. A Fast Start&quot; isn&#039;t a must being many successfull teams have surged late (the &#039;95 pack, &#039;05 steelers, and &#039;07 giants). But given our opening schedule is much easier than our later in the year, it&#039;s crucial we win those early ones-- especially since this figures to be a pretty close division race.

CheeseheadTV had a very informative post on Thompson (props Aaron and TP)  being the best rounded OLB for pass coverage and Matthews being better suited for QB preasure. Here&#039;s to hoping the can both do their roles and then some.

&quot;5. Short Yardage&quot; That goes for defense as well. The vikings got so many 4th downs that first game and it carried over the rest of the season. We rarely stopped 3rd/4th and short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Post. Very true that the majority of our question marks come on the defensive side of the ball. Our early schedule being easier may help the transition. I have faith Capers will make due. He&#8217;s turned around a lot of defenses. They don&#8217;t need to be great&#8211; like in 2007. Our overall stats weren&#8217;t amazing, but we kept points off the board.</p>
<p>Normally &#8220;10. A Fast Start&#8221; isn&#8217;t a must being many successfull teams have surged late (the &#8217;95 pack, &#8217;05 steelers, and &#8217;07 giants). But given our opening schedule is much easier than our later in the year, it&#8217;s crucial we win those early ones&#8211; especially since this figures to be a pretty close division race.</p>
<p>CheeseheadTV had a very informative post on Thompson (props Aaron and TP)  being the best rounded OLB for pass coverage and Matthews being better suited for QB preasure. Here&#8217;s to hoping the can both do their roles and then some.</p>
<p>&#8220;5. Short Yardage&#8221; That goes for defense as well. The vikings got so many 4th downs that first game and it carried over the rest of the season. We rarely stopped 3rd/4th and short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg C.</title>
		<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/#comment-6075</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packerslounge.com/?p=6453#comment-6075</guid>
		<description>10. A fast start would be nice, but there might be a couple of extra losses early due to the new defense not yet hitting its stride.

9. &quot;I can’t think of a time in the last decade when a defensive lineman has been more heralded.&quot; Not since...Jamaal Reynolds. Oops. Sorry.

8. I&#039;m hoping for Matthews to overtake Thompson, as I think he has more upside.

7. Between the top three guys, I think we can get good performances out of two of them, and maybe Rouse will be okay as a backup with another year of experience. The safety position is not secure, though. I agree with you.

6. Getting rid of a perfectly good punter was one of Ted Thompson&#039;s biggest mistakes as Packers GM. All I want is an average punter, like Ryan. With the exception of him, that position sure has been a headache since Hentrich got away in the late 90s.

5. I thought the QB sneak was effective early in the 2008 season. But then they got too predictable with that fullback dive with Kuhn. That&#039;s the problem with having an O-line that is built for finesse rather than nastiness. I think they should just go back to what worked: the QB sneak.

4. Agreed on the importance of Barnett.

3. Ditto for Kampman.

2. Ditto for Jenkins.

1. Yeah, the Packers could get into a big hole if Rodgers goes down for even a few games. But there is still time for one of these backups to show something before the season starts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10. A fast start would be nice, but there might be a couple of extra losses early due to the new defense not yet hitting its stride.</p>
<p>9. &#8220;I can’t think of a time in the last decade when a defensive lineman has been more heralded.&#8221; Not since&#8230;Jamaal Reynolds. Oops. Sorry.</p>
<p>8. I&#8217;m hoping for Matthews to overtake Thompson, as I think he has more upside.</p>
<p>7. Between the top three guys, I think we can get good performances out of two of them, and maybe Rouse will be okay as a backup with another year of experience. The safety position is not secure, though. I agree with you.</p>
<p>6. Getting rid of a perfectly good punter was one of Ted Thompson&#8217;s biggest mistakes as <a href="http://packers.com" target='_blank' >Packers</a> GM. All I want is an average punter, like Ryan. With the exception of him, that position sure has been a headache since Hentrich got away in the late 90s.</p>
<p>5. I thought the QB sneak was effective early in the 2008 season. But then they got too predictable with that fullback dive with Kuhn. That&#8217;s the problem with having an O-line that is built for finesse rather than nastiness. I think they should just go back to what worked: the QB sneak.</p>
<p>4. Agreed on the importance of Barnett.</p>
<p>3. Ditto for Kampman.</p>
<p>2. Ditto for Jenkins.</p>
<p>1. Yeah, the Packers could get into a big hole if Rodgers goes down for even a few games. But there is still time for one of these backups to show something before the season starts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://cheeseheadtv.com/eat_more_cheese/keys-to-2009/#comment-6074</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://packerslounge.com/?p=6453#comment-6074</guid>
		<description>Undisputable is right.. AR is the key.

I think Collins for all his crap is going to be just fine. The guy did make the pro bowl and he might be stupid but he is a football player. He plays his butt off so lets remember all the heart I see on the field. He will be fine. Bigby? who knows love to shee him health along with Jenkins, Harell (i just puked a little) and all those other injuries.

Looking forward to August 1st and then September 13 when we get to play the Bears and test out our 3-4 and Jay Cutler. Should be fun to watch!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undisputable is right.. AR is the key.</p>
<p>I think Collins for all his crap is going to be just fine. The guy did make the pro bowl and he might be stupid but he is a football player. He plays his butt off so lets remember all the heart I see on the field. He will be fine. Bigby? who knows love to shee him health along with Jenkins, Harell (i just puked a little) and all those other injuries.</p>
<p>Looking forward to August 1st and then September 13 when we get to play the Bears and test out our 3-4 and Jay Cutler. Should be fun to watch!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
