Busted Fence
By Alex on Nov 16, 2008 with 8 Comments
I am almost afraid to write this, challenging perhaps one of the most knowledgeable X’s and O’s guys around, but, I can’t get it out my head. So, here you go Railbird Central – I think your fence is busted.
I just got done reading your post-game notes and I must say I am sorely disappointed in your assessment of A.J. Hawk’s performance this afternoon. Now that I think of it, I’m kinda bummed about the whole post. It isn’t making any sense to me.
I’ll be the first to admit that I’m strictly a well read fan. Be that as it may, I did watch the same game as everyone else and you have me really confused if not feeling a little twilight-zone-ish. I also admit I am not a replay freak like those fine upstanding boys at that wholesome site CheeseheadTV either, so I got one shot to watch the game and that’s all I get.
Regardless, I can’t let it go. Call me crazy.
You start by saying, and I quote:
“Hawk is a step slow as it is, and now as a middle linebacker, he’s going to have to cover running backs coming out of the backfield in pass coverage more often than he had a weakside linebacker.
The Bears exploited Hawk when Forte had six receptions for 60 yards on the day.”
Like I said I only get one shot at the game, but that is not the case at all. Firstly, I agree Hawk is still a step slow right now, and argue he isn’t even close to healthy. But today, he certainly showed more presence than Barnett had all season.
Secondly, using the word exploited is a little strong isn’t it?. Forte only had forty not sixty yards receiving today and eighteen of those yards came on one play when Collins anticipated Forte would stay in on protection. So technically, Hawk got exploited for no more than twenty-two yards. Need I mention his KEY blanket coverage on a third down play when he completely took the inside away from an obviously targeted Forte.
Playing an unfamiliar spot, wearing the headset for the first time, and leading the defense in tackles he wasn’t flashy – but seriously?
Next you add:
“Give credit to oft-injured defensive tackle Justin Harrell for playing through the pain. After suffering through a knee sprain earlier in the week and being listed as questionable, Harrell gutted it out and showed some mettle for perhaps the first time in his professional career.”
I guess I really didn’t notice anything that warranted lauding on the part of Justin Harrell. If “mettle” means actually playing a full game with an injury and not getting hurt then yes, three cheers for Harrell. Al Harris has a busted spleen and didn’t miss a game in almost ten years. Justin Harrell just figured out he could map-quest directions to work and finally made it. Collective sigh of relief would be far more appropriate than credit.
Finally:
“On Fox’s broadcast, Troy Aikman mentioned that Donald Driver has been playing through un-reported nagging health problems. Aikman specifically mentioned turf toe. Driver at one point limped off the sideline and it was possible that he aggravated this here-to-fore unknown health impairment.”
Shortly after Aikman reported the turf-toe injury on Driver (which was news to me as well) he then came back and clearly stated that Donald had hit his knee and was ready to go full speed again.
I’m sorry man, that fence must have been crowded today.
(Stay Tuned)
Filed Under: Featured



Bravo!
[...] one dominating victory over our oldest, most bitter rival and the young whippersnappers lose all respect for their elders. Don’t take it lyin’ down [...]
First of all, thanks for reading. I’m glad I’m considered a “knowledgeable X’s and O’s guy.” And thanks for the nice addition to our community. If you check out Railbird Central, I just started experimenting with adding links and will be adding Packers Lounge and some more sites within the next week or so.
My rebuttal? I guess I’ll admit that I really didn’t watch much of the game. I saw a little bit at the beginning and some bits and pieces. I probably got to hear more on the Packers Radio Network broadcast. I was at the Kohl Center covering the Wisconsin Badgers basketball game (see story at SportsBubbler.com), so I was trying to keep tabs on two games at the same time.
The one thing I apologize for, yes, Forte did have only 40 yards. I guess the six receptions is moreso what I thought could be problematic in the future. Six receptions is fairly high for a single player coming out of the backfield and is something Hawk and the Packers must guard against in future weeks (including possibly Reggie Bush next week).
As for the rest of the criticisms, I guess we’re dealing with semantics. Was “exploit” too strong? Maybe. Was “credit” too strong? Maybe. However, I think the point got across and it triggered some debate, which I think was part of my goal and I think was accomplished.
Thanks!
Brian,
I have been reading for years and will continue to do so. Yes, six is alot but when you don’t have an open receiver what are you gonna do?
The fact you were watching Landry totally tear it up for the Badge is a completely valid excuse in this Wisconsinite’s book.
still, strong opinions from someone who didn’t watch the game. But good on ya for coming clean!
As I stated on Railbird’s follow-up blog today….. Packers 37 – Bears 3.
http://community.sportsbubbler.....-film.aspx
Great post.
I am a douche