Where The Game Is Headed
By PackerAaron
Great piece from Jeffri Chadiha over at ESPN.com about the 'softening' of the game of football as it is played at the NFL level. I am in complete agreement with him on the following:
...we all know the NFL still has plenty of tough guys. What it is losing, however, is the sense that the people who run the sport are completely in touch with the fundamental aspects of the game. That was apparent once again when the league made an eye-opening adjustment to the roughing-the-passer rule during the owners' meetings in March.
The adjustment basically states that defenders who have been knocked to the ground must get back on their feet before tackling the quarterback. It's the league's attempt to avoid the type of lunging hit delivered by Kansas City Cheifs safety Bernard Pollard in September, the one that led to a season-ending knee injury for Brady. It's easy to see why the league wants to have such a rule on the books. It's also harder to think that this amendment doesn't temper the culture of a sport that always has been about brutality.
I couldn't agree more. Of course, as Chadiha goes on to point out, this is completely driven by the financials of the situation. Bob Kraft, stinging from the loss of his golden-marketing-goose starting quarterback for the season, opines:
What makes [the NFL] special is special players. It's like going to see a great movie and the star isn't in the movie. It's the same principle.
Spoken like a man divorced from reality.
What makes the NFL so special is that the best TEAM wins the game. Usually. Hell, his OWN TEAM was the the one that came out during Super Bowl introductions AS a team, rather than as individuals.
Even without Brady last season the Pats were only kept out of the postseason because they were caught off guard by the Wildcat. Think about it - they win that game and they're in. Instead, you saw a team completely taken apart by something that any high school coach could have adjusted to. Instead of crying about his injured quarterback, Kraft would be better served asking Belichick how his defense was bamboozled by a play that has been run on almost every level of football for years.
No, instead we get a complete overreaction and a change of the rules. Let me get this straight - the defender now, having been blocked and on the ground, must GET UP before he starts after the quarterback again? Somewhere Deacon Jones just destroyed a kitten.
It's beyond absurd, but it's the way it goes with the NFL. NFL Europe wasn't making money but it was allowing guys like Kurt Warner and Jake Delhomme the opportunity to play and refine their games. Instead of realizing the collective good the league was doing for their product, owners only saw the money they were losing. The NFL was only making $6 billion instead of $7 billion (or whatever...) So rather than keep the league to develop young talent, especially at the games most important position, they shut the league down. Meanwhile, quarterback play keeps getting worse and worse around the NFL.
Now, is the loss of NFL Europe the only reason? Of course not. Another big part is the rush to get signal callers drafted in the early rounds on the field way too early. For every Peyton Manning you have 10 Akili Smiths. It's ludicrous. The Lions are about to make the same mistake, reportedly planning to throw Stafford out there in Week One. There's simply no patience from teams to let guys sit and learn. Look at Carson Palmer - I think that worked out alright.
But no, rather than spend money on improving the product, the actual play on the field, the NFL and it's owners continue on down the merry marketing path to drive their business. So Brady and company are deemed untouchable. It's insane and it makes a mockery of all the guys who came before them. I would give anything to see what Johnny U would do in the modern game. The mind boggles, what with the receivers being able to run around virtually untouched and the quarterbacks in a bubble, Unitas would obliterate every passing record ever conceived.
But I digress.
Go ahead. Put a skirt on 'em.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________




Comments (15)
July 08, 2009 at 02:44 pm
Nail. On. Head. What makes the NFL special is that a Matt Castle or a Tom Brady or a Jeff Hostetler can come out off the bench to replace an injured QB and become a hero.
July 08, 2009 at 04:00 pm
When will they put a flag belt on the QB's? The lack of testosterone is deeply disturbing.
July 08, 2009 at 04:02 pm
What else is there to add? You nailed it.
July 08, 2009 at 04:07 pm
I totally agree, but I can't say I wouldn't be pissed off if someone named...oh I don't know Jared Allen...did to Rodgers what he did to MAtt Schaub and lunge at the knees of the QB twice, ultimately knocking him out of the game.
This post went before your post about the back-up QB situation, but this particular rule, whether you agree with it or not, benefits the Pack based solely on the talent drop off at the QB position after Rodgers.
July 08, 2009 at 04:22 pm
"Go ahead. Put a skirt on ‘em."
Perfect. What is this? F(l)ag football?
And not only that, Aaron, the continuous tendency of the HS and College football of using smaller players are changing the game too. You don't see a Ray Nitschke type of MLB anymore. Ray Lewis is the last one. All you see is Patrick Willis and such, who though I agree is a beast, isn't what you would call a threatening guy. You don't fear Willis will hit you. He might strip the ball with his hands, and he probably will make plays sideline to sideline, but he's not gonna put helmet to helmet and leave you unconscious. Guys like Roy Williams don't have a lot of market, because they're not as fast... Good ol' days...
July 08, 2009 at 05:01 pm
This is going to be the most scrutinized of all the penalties this coming season. One thing is for certain, QB sacks will be definitely be down this year.
July 08, 2009 at 05:24 pm
Screw Brady and his special rules when things dont go his way. They should have just called it a fumble instead of caving in with a "tuck rule" and all this would have been nipped in the bud.
PackerAaron
July 08, 2009 at 06:12 pm
To Brady's credit, he's on record saying he was fine with the hit...
July 08, 2009 at 07:18 pm
Then screw Kraft when things dont go his way.
PackerAaron
July 08, 2009 at 09:10 pm
THERE you go... ;)
July 09, 2009 at 07:26 am
Nice post aaron, the best one I've ever read!! Good work
July 09, 2009 at 07:28 am
eguy812
I HATE allen, but just remember if Allen did that to my QB as a LT Allen's knees would be hurting the next play, that is how the NFL works. Sure you can lunge at a guy's knees but you better put on a brace because you can count on that happening back to you in a hurry.
July 09, 2009 at 07:09 pm
This is similar to my idea of making it a 15 yard personal foul to make physical contact with another a player. I feel like it would really open up NFL offenses.
July 10, 2009 at 06:51 am
The NFL media machine does not market teams. It markets players. Kraft and the other owners realize that.
----
Manning vs. Brady
Manning vs. Manning
Romo v. TO
Favre v. Packers
etc.
------
Several years ago, the NFL followed the marketing lead of the NBA focused more on the players than the teams. The "Face of the Franchise". As much as I hate it, it's the reality of the game today.
July 11, 2009 at 12:49 pm
It's purely a money issue and what's sad is they somehow legitimize it with safety. The NFL doesn't care about safety. The average lifespan of an NFL offensive lineman is 56 (The Blindside, Michael Lewis). If the NFL cares about the safety of its players why have Mike Ditka and other Vets been accusing the NFL of throwing its less famous players under the bus. You can protect my million dollar quarterback, but if you're career is cut short by injury don't come to me crying about medical bills.