8 Responses to “Rodgers Review Part 2: The Two Minute Drill”

Subscribes to this topic Comment RSS or TrackBack URL

The thing that veteran QBs always say about the 2 and 4 minute drills is that getting that next first down is always the key. It keeps the offense balanced and the QB’s eyes from floating downfield when they shouldn’t be.
What I saw with Rodgers last year was that first downs be damned, he wanted the big bomb right off the bat, and that doesn’t fly in the NFL (well it does against Detroit in week 17, but pretty much everything flew against the Lions last year). He just needs to work on racking up some first downs. Once you start moving the chains, defenses take chances and that’s when you can burn them….or at least that’s what teams did to the Packers in the final minutes of games last year.

Ryeguy812 said in April 13th, 2009 at 4:16 pm

VERY fair assesment. it’s akin to knowing when to go all in witha dwindling stack in poker. why press the issue with a marginal hand( deep reciever who is covered well) when you have 3-4 “free” hands before the blind makes it’s way around to you( throws out of bounds, short dump offs, etc…). i think rodgrs will be improve this. hopefully our defense can lend a hand lait in games. i think the pressure of feeling like you have to win the game yourself is amplifie when you lead the team down for a go-ahead score only to have the defense give it right back.

jeremiah said in April 13th, 2009 at 4:18 pm

Any BS with the “pressure of Brett Favre” has got to be gone this year for Aaron Rodgers. You do get the feeling he went into 2008 with a chip the size of Sheboygan on his shoulder…out to be the ultimate team guy, the ultimate humble warrior, the ultimate guy-who-can-stay-as-healthy-as-Favre, the list goes on.

He needs to focus on being the best Aaron Rodgers he can be. Period. He’s a good player and has the potential to be a great player. And, it is up to Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy to put the right talent behind him and in front of him and make it work (sly jab at the disappearing run game and the ZBS).

L.A. said in April 13th, 2009 at 5:38 pm

Classic passive aggressive bash-age. Nice work.

PackOne said in April 13th, 2009 at 7:30 pm

Alot of the games, I recall thinking they scored with too much time left and McCarthy got outcoached in game management.

bomdad said in April 14th, 2009 at 8:59 am

Never bought into that “scored too early” school of thought. You score when you can score, too many things can go wrong if you play it conservative.

Franklin Hillside said in April 14th, 2009 at 9:44 am

No amount of film study can improve my two-minute drill. Pundits blame poor chemistry with my receivers.

Chicago Hooligan said in April 14th, 2009 at 11:53 am

Actually, there is a little to that “scoring too early” attitude. Of course, no one knew at the time, that Rodgers would be as lucky as he was getting MAC’s play calls to succeed like he did. There is that part of it, to consider at all times. You cannot discount it. Sometimes the very same game plan just wouldn’t work, for whatever reason – Wideouts can’t make position, Colledge bungles yet another protection assignment… you get the drill.

If it needs to keep being said – a handful of games were lost and Rodgers had no way of doing anything about it. This broad brush stroke of (from now on it has to be the QB’s fault, period) just has to stop. As much as WE ALL liked watching the Gunslinger out there. Quite a bit of what the Announcers were spewing WAS hype. Every Cheesehead out there has to finally own up and admit that. They gave the guy free pass after free pass and all other Team fans were very very quick to point that out all the time, packerfans. Their QB’s would never get such forgiveness. The four-letter was all the time doing so, as opposed to saying: “Hey, those Packers really played a great game, eh?!!! They have an all ’round good group of players, don’t they?!!!” No, ESPN would NEVER give Green Bay any kind of cudos to that flavor. It was always complimentary as long as Favre’s name was a part of the coverage, people. Again, not to denigrate the guy. He was “almost” bullet-proof. Yet, in the end, even the four-letter sold out of coverin’ for him.
=====================
Now, over on FoxSports, you heard a little different chatter, especially about how well Rodgers was doing “for a first-year-starting-QB, essentially a Rookie out there. We have to give the guy his due. He played maybe two/three games in any regular season up to the time (?) – then steps in and has a Pro Bowl season, while injuring his throwing arm and no-way was the O-Line like it was in 1995, when Favre “finally” threw for over 4,000 yards. Aaron Rodgers did it in his first starting year despite being handicapped with a not-so-great Offensive Line AND a somewhat timid Marty Schottenheimer [Prevent football] Head Coach micro-managing every little move as if he was runnin’ fer Congress.
==================
Harsh critique’s for Aaron Rodgers are certainly waaaay too soon as far as myself, and a whole host of other cheeseheads are concerned. That much I do know. IT WAS HIS ROOKIE YEAR – claiming he should already know what it’s like out there as if he’s been around for 17 years is over the top, guys. Contradict me all ya like. I have yet to see anyone boohoo Favre’s first THREE seasons, or even show the moxey to compare first “starting” season against “starting” season between the two, from a lot of Bloggers, to date. How many INT’s did Favre throw in his FIRST THREE YEARS?
=============================
While I do enjoy reading this website and many are quite knowledgeable – finding fault like this with a Rookie QB is seemly at best. I AGREE, his 2nd season had better be more polished and even more Jay Cutler yardage (?) successful. I would also like to see his INT level drop to a serious new low. From MY vantage point, Rodgers has a lot more Starr in him than he does Gunslinger. Although “never missing a start, despite banging up his throwing shoulder” was a pretty good feat in of itself.
=====================
I also agree, this Draft is TT’s last at stalling when it comes to bringing in good personnel. To date, he’s worlds above Mike Sherman’s non-success. And, what’s more, he compares quite favorably against Ron Wolf. The only difference? No Reggie White. That’s it.
=========================
Personally? Bootlegger handled the Favre Soap Opera pretty well and the Team certainly stands behind him – let’s not discount that, either.
JMHO

IPBprez said in April 15th, 2009 at 6:11 pm

Auction


Sponsors


Streetviews